**Author details**

Maja Meško1,2,3, Jana Suklan1,2,3 and Vasja Roblek1,2,3\*


### **References**


[5] Handzic M. Evaluating KMS effectiveness for decision support: Preliminary results. In: King WR, editor. Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning. New York: Springer; 2009. pp. 237‐252

**4. Conclusions**

182 Knowledge Management Strategies and Applications

with real data.

**Author details**

**References**

65‐76

1-19

business performance in the twenty‐first century.

Maja Meško1,2,3, Jana Suklan1,2,3 and Vasja Roblek1,2,3\*

\*Address all correspondence to: vasja.roblek@gmail.com

2 School of Advanced Social Studies, Nova Gorica, Slovenia

1 Faculty of Primorska, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia

3 Fizioterapevtika, Institution of Higher Education, Medvode, Slovenia

models, which promise gains in virtually all industries [54, 55].

The chapter represents an important theoretical contribution to the understanding of the influence of the IoT to value added in knowledge‐intensive organizations. Managers should be aware that innovative information and communication technologies are influencing the

The trend of KM 4.0 is leading toward the establishment of a communication channel for the continuous exchange of information, in most cases between machines themselves. The purpose of such automation is the individual customer‐oriented adaptation of products and services that will increase value added for organizations and customers [14, 53]. Therefore, the IoT technology enables the creation of completely new products, services, and business

The findings are based on the literature review. A particular limitation of the text is that no research was made. Further researches should be focused on the effect of this direction of technology on the ecosystem. Deeper investigation of this topic could include case study with elements of implementation, testing business benefits, and social and environmental benefits

[1] Drucker FP. Management and the world's work. Harvard Business Review. 1988;**66**(5):

[2] Roblek V, Meško M, Krapež A. A complex view of industry 4.0. SAGE Open. 2016;**6**(2):1‐12

[4] Ning H, Liu H. Cyber‐physical‐social‐thinking space based science and technology framework for the Internet of Things. Science China Information Sciences. 2015;**58**(3):

[3] Drucker PF, Wilson G. The Essential Drucker. Oxford: Butterworth‐Heinemann; 2001


[36] Zack HM. Rethinking the knowledge‐based organization. MIT Sloan Management Review. 2003;**44**(4):67‐71

[19] Roblek V, Pejić Bach M, Meško M, Bertoncelj A. The impact of social media to value

[21] Baskerville R, Dulipovici A. The theoretical foundations of knowledge management.

[22] Mosconi F. The New European Industrial Policy: Global Competitiveness and the

[23] Kogut B, Zander U. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organiza-

[24] Nachtigal M, Bertoncelj A. Ownership restructuring in transition societies from historic

[25] Davenport HT, Prusak L. Working Knowledge: How Organisations Manage What They

[26] Nonaka I. The knowledge—creating company. In Drucker PF, editor. Harvard Business Review on Knowledge Management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 1998. pp.

[27] Smither R, Houston J, McIntire S. Organization Development: Strategies for Changing

[28] Teece DJ. The foundations of enterprise performance: Dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms. The Academy of Management Perspectives.

[29] Porter M. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New

[30] Kogut B, Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication

[31] Pejić Bach M, Zoroja J, Bosilj Vukšić V. Review of Corporate Digital Divide Research: A Decadal Analysis (2003‐2012). International Journal of Information Systems and Project

[32] Miranda LCM, Lima CAS. Trends and cycles of the internet evolution and worldwide

[33] Marshall C, Prusak L, Spilberg D. Financial risk and the need for superior knowledge

[34] Drucker FP, Dyson E, Handy C, Saffo P, Senge MP. Looking ahead: Implications of the

[35] Drucker P. The coming of the new organization. In: Drucker FP, editor. Harvard Business Review on Knowledge Management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 1998. pp.

impacts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2012;**79**(4):744‐765

management. California Management Review. 1996;**38**(3):76‐101

present. Harvard Business Review. 1997;**75**(6):18‐32

tional capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science; 1995:**6**(1):76‐92

added in knowledge‐based industries. Kybernetes. 2013;**42**(4):554‐568

[20] Alexander CP. The new economy. Time. May 30, 1983:62‐70

184 Knowledge Management Strategies and Applications

Manufacturing Renaissance. London: Routledge; 2015

perspective. Acta Histrae. 2013;**21**(3):449‐466

21‐46

1-19

2014;**28**(4):328‐352

York, NY: The Free Press; 1985

Management. 2013;**1**(4):41‐55

Know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 2000

Environments. New York, NY: Routledge; 2016

of technology. Organization Science. 1992;**3**(3):383‐397

Knowledge Management Research & Practice. 2006;**4**(4):83‐105


**Provisional chapter**
