**Abstract**

**Author details**

in the Knowledge Society

162

Varna, Bulgaria

**References**

Krassimira Stoyanova Koleva2

Pavlina Kalcheva Toteva-Lyutova1\*, Stoyan Dimitrov Slavov1

1 Department of Technology of Machine Tools and Manufacturing, Technical University of

Proceedings of the International Conference on Interdisciplinary Studies (ICIS 2016) - Interdisciplinarity and Creativity

[1] Henzold Georg. Geometrical Dimensioning and Tolerancing for Design, Manufactur‐ ing and Inspection: A Handbook for Geometrical Product Specification Using ISO

[2] ISO 1101. Geometrical product specifications (GPS) —Geometrical tolerancing —Tol‐ erances of form, orientation, location and run-out (ISO 1101:2012, including Cor.

[3] ISO/DIS 5458. Geometrical product specifications (GPS) — Geometrical tolerancing

[4] ISO 2692. Geometrical product specifications (GPS) —Geometrical tolerancing — Maximum material requirement (MMR), least material requirement (LMR) and reci‐

[5] ISO 5459. Geometrical product specifications (GPS) —Geometrical tolerancing —Da‐

[6] ISO 8015. Geometrical product specifications (GPS) —Fundamentals —Concepts,

2 Department of Technical Mechanics, Technical University of Varna, Bulgaria

and ASME Standards. 2nd ed. Butterworth-Heinemann; 2006. 416 p.

procity requirement (RPR) (ISO 2692:2014). CEN/TC 290; 2014. 57 p.

tums and datum systems (ISO 5459:2011). CEN/TC 290; 2011. 91 p.

principles and rules (ISO 8015:2011). CEN/TC 290; 2011. 20 p.

\*Address all correspondence to: pavlina\_toteva@abv.bg

1:2013). CEN/TC290; 2013. 114 p.

— Positional and pattern tolerancing. Forthcoming.

and

Extended experience and knowledge need creativity as a third component to create a base for any innovative endeavour or advancement. Transdisciplinary approach and an opening for creative integration of the information are crucial in any educational endeav‐ our. This paper reports correlation analyses performed on the results of a quantitative and qualitative study based on five dimensions (creativity components, personal, inter‐ personal, equipment and conjectural), aiming to determine the incentive and inhibitor factors of creativity in the activity of the engineering student work groups. Strong liaison between creativity components and personal, alternate experiences were detected, while inertial approaches in learning and dependence to guidance and equipment were identi‐ fied as deterring creativity.

**Keywords:** Innovative thinking, correlation analyse, transdisciplinarity, creative integra‐ tion
