**Author details**

Mitchel C. Schiewe

Address all correspondence to: mschiewe@ovationfertility.com

Ovation Fertility, Newport Beach, CA, USA

### **References**


[11] Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Ieda S, Kato O. Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and elimination of potential contamination. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005b;11:608–14.

**Author details**

194 Cryopreservation in Eukaryotes

Mitchel C. Schiewe

**References**

1986;23:1–13.

1997;35:219–29.

1999;72:1073–8.

2005a;11:300–8.

Cryobiology. 1987;24:387–402.

J Reprod Fertil. 1993;99:471–7.

Address all correspondence to: mschiewe@ovationfertility.com

or vitrification. Theriogenology. 1991;36:279–93.

temperatures. Biol Reprod. 1992;47:1134–9.

[1] Rall WF, Wood MJ, Kirby C, Whittingham DG. Development of mouse embryos

[2] Schiewe MC, Rall WF, Stuart LD, Wildt DE. Ovine embryo cryopreservation: Analysis of cryoprotectant, cooling rate and *in situ* straw dilution using conventional freezing

[3] Fahy GM. The relevance of cryoprotectant "toxicity" to cryobiology. Cryobiology.

[4] Rall WF. Factors affecting the survival of mouse embryos cryopreserved by vitrification.

[5] Kasai M, Nishimori M, Zhu SE, Sakurai T, Machida T. Survival of mouse morulae vitrified in an ethylene glycol‐based solution after exposure to the solution at various

[6] Ali J, Shelton JN. Design of vitrification solutions for the cryopreservation of embryos.

[7] Shaw JM, Kuleshova LL, MacFarlane DR, Trounson AO. Vitrification properties of solutions of ethylene glycol in saline containing PVP, Ficoll, or Dextran. Cryobiology.

[8] Vajta G, Nagy ZP. Are programmable freezers still needed in the embryo laboratory?

[9] Lane M, Schoolcraft WB, Gardner D. Vitrification of mouse and human blastocysts using a novel cryoloop container‐less technique. Fertil Steril.

[10] Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Kato O, Leibo S. Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online.

Review on vitrification. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12:779–96.

cryopreserved by vitrification. J Reprod Fertil. 1987;80:499–504.

Ovation Fertility, Newport Beach, CA, USA


with the hemi‐straw carrier: Application of assisted hatching after thawing. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1504–11.


packaging and reduced concentrations of cryoprotectants. Cryobiology. 2007;54:305–9.

[37] Isachenko V, Montag M, Isachenko E, Zaeva V, Krivokharchenko I, et al. Aseptic technology of vitrification of human pronuclear oocytes using open‐pulled straws. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:492–6.

with the hemi‐straw carrier: Application of assisted hatching after thawing.

[24] Liebermann J, Tucker M. Effect of carrier system on the yield of human oocytes and embryos as assessed by survival and developmental potential after vitrification.

[25] Van Landuyt L, Verpoest W, Verheyen G, De Vos A, Van de Velde H, et al. Closed blastocyst vitrification of biopsied embryos: Evaluation of 100 consecutive warming

[26] Lane M, Schoolcraft WB, Gardner D. Vitrification of mouse and human blastocysts using a novel cryoloop container‐less technique. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:1073–8.

[27] Mukaida T, Nakamura S, Tomiyama T, Wada S, Kasai M, Takahashi K. Successful birth after transfer of vitrified human blastocysts with use of a cryoloop containerless

[28] Mukaida T, Oka C, Goto T, Takahashi K. Artificial shrinkage of blastocoeles using either a micro‐needle or a laser pulse prior to the cooling steps of vitrification improves survival rate and pregnancy outcome of vitrified human

[29] Katayama KP, Stehlik J, Kuwayama M, Kato O, Stehlik E. High survival rate of vitrified

[30] Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Leda S, Kato O. Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and elimination of potential contamination. Reprod

[31] Kuwayama M. Highly efficient vitrification for the cryopreservation of human oocytes

[32] Pomeroy KO, Harris S, Conaghan J, Papadakis M, Centola G, et al. Storage of cryopre‐ served reproductive tissues: Evidence that cross‐contamination of infectious agents is

[33] Rall W. Avoidance of microbial cross‐contamination of cryopreserved gametes, embryos, cells and tissues during storage in liquid nitrogen. Embryologists Newsletter.

[34] Bielanski A, Bergeron H, Lau PC, Devenish J. Microbial contamination of embryos and semen during long term banking in liquid nitrogen. Cryobiology.

[35] Bielanski A, Vajta G. Risk of contamination of germplasm during cryopreservation and

[36] Isachenko V, Katkov I, Yakovenko S, Lulat A, Ulug M, et al. Vitrification of human laser treated blastocysts within cut standard straws (CSS): Novel aseptic

human oocytes results in clinical pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:223–4.

and embryos: The Cryotop method. Theriogenology. 2007;67:73–80.

Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1504–11.

196 Cryopreservation in Eukaryotes

Reproduction. 2002;124:483–9.

cycles. Hum Reprod. 2010;26:316–22.

technique. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:618–23.

Biomed Online. 2005;11:608–14.

2003;6(2):1–7.

2003;46:146–52.

blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:3246–52.

a negligible risk. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1181–8.

cryobanking in IVF units. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:2457–67.

