**Author details**

Vilim Filipović\* , Gabrijel Ondrašek and Lana Filipović

\*Address all correspondence to: vfilipovic@agr.hr

Department of Soil Amelioration, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska, Zagreb, Croatia

### **References**


[9] Carsel RF, Parrish RS. Developing joint probability distributions of soil water retention characteristics. Water Resources Research. 1988;24:755–769. DOI: 10.1029/ wr024i005p00755

years, scientists have been mostly engaged in the coupling of different numerical models, since no single model is yet available for describing such complex system as soil vadose zone [59]. Development of coupled numerical models capable of describing unstable preferential flow in soils, as well as models coupled with sophisticated geochemical models capable of describ‐ ing complex kinetic chemical and biological reactions will remain a focus of research in the

, Gabrijel Ondrašek and Lana Filipović

Department of Soil Amelioration, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb,

[1] Topp GC, Ferré PA. Thermogravimetric using convective oven‐drying. In: Dane JH, Topp GC, editors. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 4, Physical Methods. Madison: SSSA;

[2] Topp GC, Ferré PA. Water content. In: Dane JH, Topp GC, editors. Methods of Soil

[3] Bolt GH. Soil physics terminology. Bulletin of International Society of Soil Science.

[4] Radcliffe D, Šimunek J. Soil physics with HYDRUS: modeling and applications. Boca

[6] Young MH, Sisson JB. Tensiometry. In: Dane JH, Topp GC, editors. Methods of Soil

[7] Andraski BJ, Scanlon BR. Thermocouple psychrometry. In: Dane JH, Topp GC, editors. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 4, Physical Methods. Madison: SSSA; 2002. p. 609–642.

[8] Scanlon BR, Andraski BJ, Bilskie J. Miscellaneous methods for measuring matric or water potential. In: Dane JH, Topp GC, editors. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 4,

Analysis: Part 4, Physical Methods. Madison: SSSA; 2002. p. 417–422.

[5] Jury WA, Horton R. Soil physics. 6th ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2004. 370 p.

Analysis: Part 4, Physical Methods. Madison: SSSA; 2002. p. 575–608.

Physical Methods. Madison: SSSA; 2002. p. 643–670.

\*Address all correspondence to: vfilipovic@agr.hr

158 Groundwater - Contaminant and Resource Management

Svetošimunska, Zagreb, Croatia

2002. p. 422–424.

1976;49:26–36.

Raton: CRC Press; 2010. 370 p.

near future.

**Author details**

Vilim Filipović\*

**References**


[36] Hutson JL, Wagenet RJ. A multiregion model describing water flow and solute transport in heterogeneous soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 1995;59:743– 751. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1995.03615995005900030016x

[23] Langmuir I. The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica, and platinum. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1918;40:1361–1403. DOI: 10.1021/

[24] Beven KJ, Germann PF. Macropores and water flow in soils. Water Resources Research.

[25] Gerke HH. Preferential‐flow descriptions for structured soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition

[26] Pruess K, Wang JSY. Numerical modeling of isothermal and non‐isothermal flow in unsaturated fractured rock—a review. In: Evans DD, Nicholson TJ, editors. Flow and Transport through Unsaturated Fractured Rock. Geophysics Monograph ed. Wash‐

[27] Gerke HH, van Genuchten MTh. A dual‐porosity model for simulating the preferential movement of water and solutes in structured porous media. Water Resources Research.

[28] Jarvis NJ. Modeling the impact of preferential flow on nonpoint source pollution. In: Selim HM, Ma L, editors. Physical Nonequilibrium in Soils: Modeling and Application.

[29] Šimunek J, Jarvis NJ, van Genuchten MTh, Gärdenäs A. Review and comparison of models for describing non‐equilibrium and preferential flow and transport in the vadose zone. Journal of Hydrology. 2003;272:14–35. DOI: 10.1016/s0022‐1694(02)00252‐

[30] Jarvis NJ. The MACRO Model (Version 3.1). Technical Description and Sample Simulations. Reports and Dissertations. 19 ed. Uppsala, Sweden: Swedish University

[31] Ahuja LR, Hebson C. Root Zone Water Quality Model. GPSR Technical Report No. 2

[32] Chen C, Wagenet RJ. Simulation of water and chemicals in macropore soils. Part 1. Representation of the equivalent macropore influence and its effect on soil water flow.

[33] Germann PF. Kinematic wave approach to infiltration and drainage into and from soil macropores. Transactions of the ASAE. 1985;28:745–749. DOI: 10.13031/2013.32331

[34] Germann PF, Beven K. Kinematic wave approximation to infiltration into soils with sorbing macropores. Water Resources Research. 1985;21:990–996. DOI: 10.1029/

[35] Gwo JP, Jardine PM, Wilson GV, Yeh GT. A multiple‐pore‐region concept to modeling mass transfer in subsurface media. Journal of Hydrology. 1995;164:217–237. DOI:

Journal of Hydrology. 1992;130:105–126. DOI: 10.1016/0022‐1694(92)90106‐6

1982;18:1311–1325. DOI: 10.1029/wr018i005p01311

ington: American Geophysical Union; 1987. p. 11–22.

1993;29:305–319. DOI: 10.1029/92wr02339

Chelsea: Ann Arbor Press; 1998. p. 195–221.

of Agricultural Science; 1994. 51 p.

ed. Fort Collins: USDA, ARS; 1992.

wr021i007p00990

10.1016/0022‐1694(94)02555‐p

and Soil Science. 2006;169:1–19. DOI: 10.1002/jpln.200521955

ja02242a004

160 Groundwater - Contaminant and Resource Management

4

