**Author details**

Barbara Domajnko\*

Address all correspondence to: barbara.domajnko@zf.uni-lj.si

University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ljubljana, Slovenia

### **References**

[1] Švab A, Urek M. Nove partnerske in družinske oblike — primer istospolnih partner‐ skih zvez in družin v Sloveniji. V: Rener T, Sedmak M, Švab A, Urek M. Družine in družinsko življenje v Sloveniji. Koper: Založba Annales; 2006. p127–50.

[2] Kuhar R. Medijske podobe homoseksualnosti: analiza slovenskih tiskanih medijev od 1970 do 2000. Ljubljana: Mirovni inštitut; 2003.

judgemental, to raise awareness, and reject socially constructed prejudice [39]. This should also involve the visibility of homosexuals in informational material on sexuality, family

Homophobia is neither inevitable nor universal. It is socially constructed and maintained through homophobic discourse. Discourse is a powerful means of inciting and perpetuating prejudiced and discriminatory talk at the more implicit levels of communication. Disclaimers proved powerful discursive strategies of impression management. Their structure is such that it enables the speaker to express prejudiced attitudes, yet keeps the facade of tolerance. Language use perceived in its social context goes beyond mere articulation, it involves simultaneous action. Constructing and maintaining prejudices and discriminatory talk about homosexually oriented people may also result in unequal health care. Evidence was collected from gays and lesbians, midwives, and midwifery students. Gaining knowledge helps us overcome prejudice and fight discrimination. Understanding the powers of discourse gives us tools to deconstruct discriminatory messages and practices, triggers our critical thinking skills, raises our awareness, and enables us to act more tolerantly. Knowledge about homosexually oriented people and their health needs empowers health care professionals to provide better and more equal health care. In Slovenia, research should systematically be deployed to provide knowledge on LGBT people and their health needs, and professional education programs should adequately address them to deconstruct prejudices, raise awareness of discriminatory practices, and thus enable midwives to provide relevant, emphatic, holistic, and equally

planning, pregnancy, labour, parenting and partner support, and midwifery.

**9. Conclusion**

184 Sexology in Midwifery

accessible midwifery care.

**Author details**

Barbara Domajnko\*

**References**

Address all correspondence to: barbara.domajnko@zf.uni-lj.si

University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ljubljana, Slovenia

[1] Švab A, Urek M. Nove partnerske in družinske oblike — primer istospolnih partner‐ skih zvez in družin v Sloveniji. V: Rener T, Sedmak M, Švab A, Urek M. Družine in

družinsko življenje v Sloveniji. Koper: Založba Annales; 2006. p127–50.


[36] Erlandsson K, Linder H, Häggström-Nordin E. Experiences of gay women during their partner's pregnancy and childbirth. British Journal of Midwifery 2010; 18(2): 99–103.

[19] Edwards J. The healthcare needs of gay and lesbian patients. In: Kuhlman E, Annan‐ dale E (eds). The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Healthcare. Palgrave Macmil‐

[20] Fish J, Hunt R. Prescription for change. Lesbian and bisexual women's health check.

[21] Wilton T. Towards an understanding of the cultural roots of homophobia in order to provide a better midwifery service for lesbian clients. Midwifery 1999; 15(3): 154–64.

[22] Experiences of healthcare 2012. http://www.stonewall.org.uk/documents/experien‐

[23] Urek M. Vodič za preživetje skozi socialno-varstvene službe ter službe duševnega

[24] Billig M. The Notion of 'Prejudice': Some Rhetorical and Ideological Aspects. Text

[25] Hermansson E, Mårtensson L. Empowerment in the midwifery context — a concept

[26] Gospodinjstva in družine, Slovenija, 1. Januar 2011 — končni podatki. http://

[27] Zaviršek D. Med krvjo in skrbjo: Socialno starševstvo kot širitev koncepta starševstva

[28] Urek M. Lezbične in gejevske družine v Sloveniji: implikacije za socialno delo. Druž‐

[29] Švab A. Sociološki vidiki fenomena novega očetovstva: primer očetovstva in star‐

[32] Bailey NW, Zuk M. Same-sex sexual behavior and evolution. Trends in Ecology &

[33] Lock M. Accounting for Disease and Distress: Morals of the Normal and Abnormal. In: Albrecht GL, Fitzpatrick R, Scrimshaw SC. (eds.) Handbook of Social Studies in

[34] Röndahl G, Bruhner E, Lindhe J. Heteronormative communication with lesbian fami‐ lies in antenatal care, childbirth and postnatal care. Journal of Advanced Nursing

[35] Larsson A-K, Dykes A-K. Care during pregnancy and childbirth in Sweden: Perspec‐

Health and Medicine. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.; 2000. p. 259–77.

[30] Golombok S. Parenting: What really counts? London, New York: Routledge; 2000.

www.stat.si/novica\_prikazi.aspx?id=4029 (accessed 21 August 2014).

ševstva v lezbičnih družinah. Teorija in praksa 2007, 44 (1–2): 142–58.

lan; 2012. p. 290–305.

186 Sexology in Midwifery

1988; 8: 91–110.

London: Stonewall; 2008.

ces\_of\_healthcare.pdf (accessed 21 August 2014).

analysis. Midwifery 2011; 27(6): 811–6.

boslovne razprave 2005; 21(49-50):155–74.

Evolution 2009; 24(8): 439–46.

2009; 65(11): 2337–44.

zdravja za lezbijke in geje. Socialno delo 2002; 41(2): 113–8.

v današnjem svetu. Socialno delo 2009; 48(1–3): 3–16.

[31] Zaviršek D. Gaybyboom v Sloveniji. Narobe 2008; 2(5): 21.

tives of lesbian women. Midwifery 2009; 25(6): 682–90.

