**Biochemical and Electrochemical Perspectives of the Anode of a Microbial Fuel Cell**

Aishwarya Mahadevan, Duminda A. Gunawardena and Sandun Fernando

Additional information is available at the end of the chapter

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/58755

**1. Introduction**

[12] Trirron DJ. Physical fluid dynamics. 2nd ed., Oxford University Inc, New York, USA

[14] Wang, C. T., Fang, S. J., and Z. Q. Qi, Design of Convergent Flow Channel Applied to

[15] Wang, C. T., Yang, C. M., Chen, Z. S., and T. Shuai, Effect of Biometric Flow Channel on the Power Generation at Different Reynolds numbers in the Single Chamber of

[16] Simpson, R. L., Turbulent boundary-layer separation, *Annual Review of Fluid Mechan‐*

[17] Lashkov, Y. A., Sokolova, I. N., & Shumilkina, E. A., Jet flow over ribbed curved sur‐

[18] Logan, B. E., Hamelers, B., Rozendal, R., Schröder, U., Keller, J., Freguia, S.,... & Ra‐ baey, K., Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology. *Environmental science &*

[19] Du Z, Li H, Gu T., A state of the art review on microbial fuel cells: a promising tech‐ nology for wastewater treatment and bio-energy, *Biotech Adv*, 25464 (2007).

[20] Huang, L., Cheng, S., Rezaei, F., & Logan, B. E. Reducing organic loads in wastewa‐ ter effluents from paper recycling plants using microbial fuel cells. *Environmental*

[21] Qi, Z. Q., Fan, S. J., Wang, C. T., and Z. Y. Hu, Mixing effect of biometric flow chan‐

[22] Wang, H. Y., & Su, J. Y., Membraneless microfluidic microbial fuel cell for rapid de‐ tection of electrochemical activity of microorganism, *Bioresource technology*.,145, 217

[23] Choban, E.R., Markoski, L.J., Wieckowski, A., Kenis, P.J.A., Microfluidic fuel cell

[24] Sprague, I.B., Byun, D., Dutta, P., Effects of reactant crossover and electrode dimen‐ sions on the performance of a microfluidic based laminar flow fuel cell.,Electrochimi‐

nel in microbial fuel cells, *Appl Energ*, 100, 106 (2012).

based on laminar flow, J. Power Sources, 128 (1), 54 (2004).

[13] Wang CT, Hu TC, Hu TY. Biophysical micromixer, *Sensor*, 9, 5379 (2009).

Rumem Microbial Fuel Cell (RMFC), Int J Hydrog Energy, 9242 (2011).

Sediment Microbial Fuel Cells, *APPEEC*, 1 (2011).

(1988).

*ics*, 21(1), 205 (1989).

12 Technology and Application of Microbial Fuel Cells

faces, *Fluid dynamics*, 27(1), 135 (1992).

*technology*, 40(17), 5181 (2006).

*technology*, 30(5), 499 (2009).

ca Acta, 55 (28), 8579 (2010).

(2013).

#### **1.1. History of biofuel cell**

The statement "Perhaps the most refined fuel cell system today is the human body, a mecha‐ nism that catalytically burns food (fuel) in an electrolyte to produce energy, some of which is electrical" highlights the connection between living organisms and electricity [1, 2]. With an experiment conducted using frog leg, Biologist Lugi Galvani in 1780's proved that electrical energy and biology have a close connection to each other [3]. Michael Cresse Potter, a Botany professor also demonstrated that living organisms can generate voltage and deliver current [4].

The term "fuel cell" has been in use for over a century. Despite some uncertainty about who first fabricated one, credits of designing and experimenting with first fuel cells go to both Sir William Grove (1839) and the Swiss scientist Christian F. Shoenbein (1868). In early 19th century, different organisms like bacteria, algae, and yeast were considered for this research. With the advent of space race, considerable attention was given to energy generation from recycled waste which in turn ignited interest in microbial fuel cell research. Later, during the sixties and in the early seventies, fuel cell related research accelerated as a consequence of increase in oil prices and has sustained momentum to date. [5, 6]. The time lines of fuel cell development are shown in the Fig.1.

© 2014 The Author(s). Licensee InTech. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

organism like Baker's yeast that feed on simple sugars or an advanced species like *R. ferrire‐*

Biochemical and Electrochemical Perspectives of the Anode of a Microbial Fuel Cell

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/58755

15

Various types of MFC designs have been developed of which five main categories are common:

**1. Uncoupled bioreactor MFC**: a separate compartment where organisms produce the

**2. Integrated bioreactor MFC**: hydrogen fuel production and the electricity generation both

**3. MFC with mediated electron transfer**: where intermediate molecules shuttle electrons

**4. MFC with direct electron transfer**: where electron transfer to the electrode take place

**5. Mediator-less and membrane-less microfluidic MFC**: an emerging type of MFC that

The first two designs use hydrogen that is biologically generated and uses this hydrogen in a PEM-like fuel cell system. Thus, these fuel cells possess similarities with their inorgan‐ ic counterparts. There are different types of bacteria and algae that generate hydrogen under anaerobic conditions, e.g. *Escherichia coli, Enterobactor and C. butyricum*that can be used in such reactors. Theoretical output in these fuel cells is in the neighborhood of 10% but in actual environment, the values have been slightly less. Enzyme interactions (such as hydrogenases) with H2 is one reason for performance reduction. The inhibition of anaero‐ bic hydrogenases by evolving oxygen (during photosynthesis) is another. Contamination of H2 with other gaseous species such as CO and H2S is also considered to contribute toward inefficiencies. The second design mentioned above has similar disadvantages to the first with the only difference being the position of the bioreactor [11, 12]. Such MFCs common‐

In the third type, an intermediate molecule known as mediator is used for electron transport [13]. The mediator will shuttle electrons between the electrode and redox enzyme in the microorganism [14] following redox cycles as given in Equations1&2. Different mediators that

6 12 6 (o r ) ( ) C H O + Mediator Product + Mediator ¾¾® (1)

Mediator Mediator + Electrons (r o ) ¾¾® ( ) (2)

hydrogen (fuel) and that hydrogen is fed into a hydrogen fuel cell.

*ducens* [8-10] that thrive on more complex substrates.

**1.3. Different categories of microbial fuel cells**

take place in the same chamber.

ly use Pt as electrode catalysts.

from microbial cells to the electrode.

without the presence of any mediator molecules.

have been utilized in microbial fuel cells are listed in Fig.2.

eliminates use of mediators and cation exchange membrane.

**Figure 1.** The time line of fuel cell development [7]

## **1.2. Types of fuel cells**

Fuel cells could be broadly categorized into abiotic fuel cells of which the fuel cell components do not comprise any biological material and biotic or biological fuel cells which comprises living organisms or biological material (such as enzymes or derivatives). The primary types of abiotic fuel cells grouped according to the electrolyte used are shown in Table 1.


**Table 1.** Different types of commonly known inorganic fuel cells [7].

The biological fuel cell (BFC) can be categorized into two main areas:


The biological fuel cells (BFC) use enzymes or microorganisms as catalysts. In a microbial fuel cell, the oxidation reactions that are catalyzed by microbes; alternatively, when the catalyst is an enzyme, the cell is called as an enzymatic fuel cell. While both microorganisms and enzymes catalyze oxidative reactions that takes place at the anode, only enzymes (sometime coupled with inorganic catalysts) are used in the cathode. Biological fuel cells utilize organic substrates (such as sugars and alcohols) and operate at mild temperature environments where biological activity is optimal. For example, the catalyst used in a microbial fuel cell could simply be an organism like Baker's yeast that feed on simple sugars or an advanced species like *R. ferrire‐ ducens* [8-10] that thrive on more complex substrates.

### **1.3. Different categories of microbial fuel cells**

Reinvention

14 Technology and Application of Microbial Fuel Cells

**Figure 1.** The time line of fuel cell development [7]

Scientific curiosity

**1.2. Types of fuel cells**

Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells

**1.** Microbial fuel cells (MFC)

**2.** Enzymatic fuel cells (EFC)

**Table 1.** Different types of commonly known inorganic fuel cells [7].

The biological fuel cell (BFC) can be categorized into two main areas:

(PEMFC)

1839 1939 1960's 1990's

Industrial Curiosity

Space program

Fuel cells could be broadly categorized into abiotic fuel cells of which the fuel cell components do not comprise any biological material and biotic or biological fuel cells which comprises living organisms or biological material (such as enzymes or derivatives). The primary types

**Type Features** Alkaline fuel cells (AFC) Uses KOH as the electrolyte and electro-catalysts such as

Phosphoric acid fuel cells (PAFC) Uses concentrated phosphoric acid as the electrolyte and

The biological fuel cells (BFC) use enzymes or microorganisms as catalysts. In a microbial fuel cell, the oxidation reactions that are catalyzed by microbes; alternatively, when the catalyst is an enzyme, the cell is called as an enzymatic fuel cell. While both microorganisms and enzymes catalyze oxidative reactions that takes place at the anode, only enzymes (sometime coupled with inorganic catalysts) are used in the cathode. Biological fuel cells utilize organic substrates (such as sugars and alcohols) and operate at mild temperature environments where biological activity is optimal. For example, the catalyst used in a microbial fuel cell could simply be an

Molten carbonate fuel cells (MCFC) Has a combination of alkali metals (Li, K, or Na ) Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) Uses non-porous metal oxide(s) as the electrolyte

Ni, Ag and metal oxides

Pt as the catalyst

electrolyte and Pt as the catalyst

Uses a proton conductive polymer membrane as the

of abiotic fuel cells grouped according to the electrolyte used are shown in Table 1.

Birth of new industry

Entrepreneural phase

Various types of MFC designs have been developed of which five main categories are common:


The first two designs use hydrogen that is biologically generated and uses this hydrogen in a PEM-like fuel cell system. Thus, these fuel cells possess similarities with their inorgan‐ ic counterparts. There are different types of bacteria and algae that generate hydrogen under anaerobic conditions, e.g. *Escherichia coli, Enterobactor and C. butyricum*that can be used in such reactors. Theoretical output in these fuel cells is in the neighborhood of 10% but in actual environment, the values have been slightly less. Enzyme interactions (such as hydrogenases) with H2 is one reason for performance reduction. The inhibition of anaero‐ bic hydrogenases by evolving oxygen (during photosynthesis) is another. Contamination of H2 with other gaseous species such as CO and H2S is also considered to contribute toward inefficiencies. The second design mentioned above has similar disadvantages to the first with the only difference being the position of the bioreactor [11, 12]. Such MFCs common‐ ly use Pt as electrode catalysts.

In the third type, an intermediate molecule known as mediator is used for electron transport [13]. The mediator will shuttle electrons between the electrode and redox enzyme in the microorganism [14] following redox cycles as given in Equations1&2. Different mediators that have been utilized in microbial fuel cells are listed in Fig.2.

$$\rm C\_6H\_{12}O\_6 + Mediant\_{[o]} \longrightarrow Product + Medator\_{[r]} \tag{1}$$

$$\text{Medator}\_{\text{(t)}} \longrightarrow \text{Medator}\_{\text{(o)}} + \text{Electrons} \tag{2}$$

cases is oxygen. In order to keep the fuel from being crossed over to the cathode compartment or oxygen from entering the anode compartment (commonly referred to as cross over reac‐ tions), a membrane (commonly referred to as proton exchange membrane or PEM) that is selective only for protons (transport) is generally used. A schematic of the reactions that take

> M E M B R A N E

CATHODE COMPARTMENT

Biochemical and Electrochemical Perspectives of the Anode of a Microbial Fuel Cell

Fe(CN)**<sup>6</sup> 3-** .

Fe(CN)**<sup>6</sup> 4-** .

O2

e-

H2O

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/58755

17

H+

Microorganisms derive energy for living from the free energy produced by fuel oxidation. A part of the free energy produced is retained by the microbes for their catabolic activities and the rest may be utilized to generate electricity. Hence, for sustainable operation of the MFC, it is necessary for the microorganism to balance out the amount of energy consumed for its

There are two metabolic pathways used for energy conversion in microbes namely, respiration and fermentation. In the respiratory or oxidative pathway, the Gibbs free energy is utilized by the microbes for their respiration where the electrons circulate around a respiratory chain and

Under aerobic conditions, oxidation of the fuel glucose follows four distinctive steps [23]: 1) Glycolysis, 2) Krebs Cycle, 3) Electron transport chain, and 4) Oxidative phosphorylation. In glycolysis which is also known as Embden-Mayarhoff-Parnas pathway, the six carbon glucose atom is broken down into two molecules of pyruvate as shown in Equation 3. This takes place in ten successive steps, each of which is catalyzed by a specific enzyme. Pyruvate, the product

e-

place in a microbial fuel cell is depicted in Fig. 3.

ANODE COMPARTMENT

MB**OX**

e-

**2.1. Catabolic pathways involved in energy production from microbes**

finally exits the microbial cell via membrane-bound electron acceptors.

MBRED.

**Figure 3.** Schematic diagram of a microbial fuel cell and its operation [22]

vitality and that being converted into electrical energy.

FUEL

CO2

ORGANISM

**Figure 2.** Different mediators used in biological fuel cells.

The characteristics that the mediators must possess are well established [15, 16]: 1) The molecules should be able to form redox couples; 2) They should be stable in both, reduced and oxidized form; 3) They should not be biologically degradable; and 4) They should not be toxic to the biological species. However, in practice, mediators have commonly contributed to fuel cell performance issues due to degradation and toxicity to the biological medium [17, 18].

The fourth type of MFCs do not contain any extraneous mediators and in this type, bacteria are believed to communicate directly with the electrode using self-made mediators. Studies supporting this hypothesis have been conducted with iron-reducing bacteria such as *Shewa‐ nella putrefaciens*, *Geobactor sulferreducens*, and *Rhodeferax ferrireducens* [19]. The fifth type involves miniaturization of MFC using microfluidic technology which is capable of achieving high energy efficiency and durability. This type enables an advantage over conventional MFCs by eliminating the need for membranes (PEM) as a result of co-laminar flow of fuel and oxidant streams that extemporaneously separate anode and cathode in the cell. Electron transport to the anode can occur using electron mediators, or by direct membrane associated electron transfer, or by purported nanowires produced by certain microbes [20, 21].

## **2. Biochemical and electrochemical phenomena that occur at the electrodes of MFCs**

Just like in any other fuel cell, the oxidation reaction in a microbial fuel cell occurs at the anode releasing electrons to and protons at the anode. The concomitant reduction half reaction takes place at the cathode collecting the electrons that travelled through an external circuit and combining them along with the protons with the terminal electron acceptor-which in most cases is oxygen. In order to keep the fuel from being crossed over to the cathode compartment or oxygen from entering the anode compartment (commonly referred to as cross over reac‐ tions), a membrane (commonly referred to as proton exchange membrane or PEM) that is selective only for protons (transport) is generally used. A schematic of the reactions that take place in a microbial fuel cell is depicted in Fig. 3.

**Figure 3.** Schematic diagram of a microbial fuel cell and its operation [22]

Mediators

Ubiquinones Dyes Metal

Methyl Blue

Nutral red

Thionine

Resorufin

The characteristics that the mediators must possess are well established [15, 16]: 1) The molecules should be able to form redox couples; 2) They should be stable in both, reduced and oxidized form; 3) They should not be biologically degradable; and 4) They should not be toxic to the biological species. However, in practice, mediators have commonly contributed to fuel cell performance issues due to degradation and toxicity to the biological medium [17, 18].

The fourth type of MFCs do not contain any extraneous mediators and in this type, bacteria are believed to communicate directly with the electrode using self-made mediators. Studies supporting this hypothesis have been conducted with iron-reducing bacteria such as *Shewa‐ nella putrefaciens*, *Geobactor sulferreducens*, and *Rhodeferax ferrireducens* [19]. The fifth type involves miniaturization of MFC using microfluidic technology which is capable of achieving high energy efficiency and durability. This type enables an advantage over conventional MFCs by eliminating the need for membranes (PEM) as a result of co-laminar flow of fuel and oxidant streams that extemporaneously separate anode and cathode in the cell. Electron transport to the anode can occur using electron mediators, or by direct membrane associated electron

**2. Biochemical and electrochemical phenomena that occur at the electrodes**

Just like in any other fuel cell, the oxidation reaction in a microbial fuel cell occurs at the anode releasing electrons to and protons at the anode. The concomitant reduction half reaction takes place at the cathode collecting the electrons that travelled through an external circuit and combining them along with the protons with the terminal electron acceptor-which in most

transfer, or by purported nanowires produced by certain microbes [20, 21].

Coenzyme-Q

16 Technology and Application of Microbial Fuel Cells

2-Hydoxy-1,4 napthoquinone

**of MFCs**

1-Napthol-2-sulphonate indo-2,6-dichloro-phenol

**Figure 2.** Different mediators used in biological fuel cells.

complexes

Manganus Oxides

Potasium FeriCyanide

#### **2.1. Catabolic pathways involved in energy production from microbes**

Microorganisms derive energy for living from the free energy produced by fuel oxidation. A part of the free energy produced is retained by the microbes for their catabolic activities and the rest may be utilized to generate electricity. Hence, for sustainable operation of the MFC, it is necessary for the microorganism to balance out the amount of energy consumed for its vitality and that being converted into electrical energy.

There are two metabolic pathways used for energy conversion in microbes namely, respiration and fermentation. In the respiratory or oxidative pathway, the Gibbs free energy is utilized by the microbes for their respiration where the electrons circulate around a respiratory chain and finally exits the microbial cell via membrane-bound electron acceptors.

Under aerobic conditions, oxidation of the fuel glucose follows four distinctive steps [23]: 1) Glycolysis, 2) Krebs Cycle, 3) Electron transport chain, and 4) Oxidative phosphorylation. In glycolysis which is also known as Embden-Mayarhoff-Parnas pathway, the six carbon glucose atom is broken down into two molecules of pyruvate as shown in Equation 3. This takes place in ten successive steps, each of which is catalyzed by a specific enzyme. Pyruvate, the product of glycolysis goes further through a three stage process where it is finally converted to CO2 and more energy in the form of ATP. The total ATP production from glucose in a respiring system is given in the Table 2.

+ - O + 24H + 24e 12H O 2 2 ¾¾® **<sup>0</sup> E = 1.23V** (6)

Biochemical and Electrochemical Perspectives of the Anode of a Microbial Fuel Cell

to NADH conversion takes place at a significant rate, while under aerobic

and NADH. For the

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/58755

) getting

19

Since ATP production is quite low under anaerobic conditions i.e. almost two molecules per

involved in the reaction. In that perspective, anaerobic conditions are much favorable for the harvesting of protons when compared with aerobic conditions. Under anaerobic conditions,

conditions the already present oxygen in the media reacts with H+ making it difficult to run

In a MFC system, the main electron acceptor that is engaged in harboring the electrons released from microbes is a solid anode. The formation of a biofilm on the anode is believed to be driven by the consumption of greater amounts of energy (released by microbial catabolism) by the solid anode when compared to the other electron acceptors. The bridging concepts of electron transfer between microbes and the solid anode is still under speculation and is discussed

The electron transfer mechanism involves amalgamation of knowledge from electrochemistry, biochemistry and microbiology. Electrons pass on to the electrode of MFC as a result of several irreversible enzymatic reactions and eventually the reversible electrochemical reactions of the electron transport chain [24]. For the reversible interfacial reaction to take place at the anode surface, electrons rely on shuttles such as cytochromes, proteins (such as PQQ), bound or

Several electron transfer mechanisms and processes have been proposed including direct electron transfer, indirect electron transfer and shuttle mediated transfer of electrons. Of the various mechanisms proposed, direct contact mechanism indicates formation of monolayer of microbes on the anode surface enabling direct transfer of electrons to the anode via cell membrane or a membrane organelle. Kim et al. [26] observed that certain Fe(III)-reducing bacteria (*Shewanella putrefaciens*) can transfer electrons to the electrode without the aid of synthetic mediators as shown in Fig.4a. Cytochrome, a redox protein perhaps present on the outer membrane of the cell supposedly causes direct electron transfer by its electrochemical activity of reducing water soluble Fe(III). This type of transfer is capable of producing lowest extracellular potential losses due to the negligible gap between microbe and the electrode. However, the electron transfer in this mechanism is limited by the total number of bacteria in direct contact with anode [27]. Also, the c-type cytochrome may not be present in all the Fe(III)-

soluble redox mediators to reach atleast within 10 Å proximity of the anode [25].

reducing bacteria which further limits the electron transfer to a very few species [28].

Apart from ferric ion reducing bacteria, yeast cells (*Hansenula anomala*) have also been successfully found to enable a direct electrical communication between the cells and anode surface. In this case, electron transfer takes place without any external mediator or any intermediate redox reaction such as Fe(III) reduction, but with the help of redox enzymes,

purpose of harvesting H+ what matters for a MFC is the amount of co-enzyme (NAD+

one pyruvate molecule, the organisms need rapid processing of NAD+

the rate of NAD+

briefly in the next section.

**2.2. Electron transfer mechanisms**

the half reaction given by Equation 6.

$$2\text{C}\_6\text{H}\_{12}\text{O}\_6 + 2\text{NAD}^+ + 2\text{ADP} + 2\text{Pi} \longrightarrow 2\text{NADH} + 2\text{ATP} + 2\text{Pyruvate} + 2\text{H}^+ + 2\text{H}\_2\text{O} \tag{3}$$


**Table 2.** ATP yield for corresponding biochemical reaction(s)

Even though aerobic respiration is the main form of energy generation in organisms, some can generate energy under anaerobic conditions. Under anaerobic conditions, glucose will be converted to pyruvate as it was under aerobic conditions, but in the next stage instead of the Krebs cycle a different pathway will follow-specific to the type of organism viz. prokaryote/ eukaryote. While yeast for instance undergoes alcohol fermentation, some organisms follow the lactic acid fermentation.

In microbial catabolism under anaerobic conditions, carbohydrates are oxidized without the presence of oxygen. This oxidation reaction gets partially completed inside the microbial cellular structure and with the help of co-enzymes, the electrons and protons are transferred outside the cellular membrane. The overall reaction of a fermentative MFC is given in Equation 4. This reaction can be broken down to half reactions as shown by Equation 5&6. Inside the anaerobic compartment of a MFC, the reaction represented in Equation 4 takes place where the electrons released will be transferred to anode and the protons (H+ ) travel to the cathode compartment (sometimes via a proton exchange membrane). The released electrons from the anode will go through an external load as shown in Fig.3. and consequently enter the cathode.

$$\text{C}\_6\text{H}\_{12}\text{O}\_6 + 6\text{O}\_2 \longrightarrow 6\text{CO}\_2 + 6\text{H}\_2\text{O} \tag{4}$$

$$\text{C}\_6\text{H}\_{12}\text{O}\_6 + 6\text{H}\_2\text{O} \longrightarrow \text{ 6CO}\_2 + 24\text{H}^+ + 24\text{e}^-\\\text{E}^0 = \text{0.014V} \tag{5}$$

$$\text{O}\_2 + 24\text{H}^+ + 24\text{e}^- \longrightarrow 12\text{H}\_2\text{O} \text{ E}^0 = \text{1.23V} \tag{6}$$

Since ATP production is quite low under anaerobic conditions i.e. almost two molecules per one pyruvate molecule, the organisms need rapid processing of NAD+ and NADH. For the purpose of harvesting H+ what matters for a MFC is the amount of co-enzyme (NAD+ ) getting involved in the reaction. In that perspective, anaerobic conditions are much favorable for the harvesting of protons when compared with aerobic conditions. Under anaerobic conditions, the rate of NAD+ to NADH conversion takes place at a significant rate, while under aerobic conditions the already present oxygen in the media reacts with H+ making it difficult to run the half reaction given by Equation 6.

In a MFC system, the main electron acceptor that is engaged in harboring the electrons released from microbes is a solid anode. The formation of a biofilm on the anode is believed to be driven by the consumption of greater amounts of energy (released by microbial catabolism) by the solid anode when compared to the other electron acceptors. The bridging concepts of electron transfer between microbes and the solid anode is still under speculation and is discussed briefly in the next section.

#### **2.2. Electron transfer mechanisms**

of glycolysis goes further through a three stage process where it is finally converted to CO2 and more energy in the form of ATP. The total ATP production from glucose in a respiring

<sup>+</sup> <sup>+</sup> C H O + 2NAD + 2ADP + 2Pi 2NADH + 2ATP + 2Pyruvate + 2H + 2H O 6 12 6 ¾¾® <sup>2</sup> (3)

Glucose → Fructose 1,6-diphoshate -2 2 Trios Phosphate → 2,3-phosphoglyceric acid 2 2NAD<sup>+</sup> → 2NADH → 2NAD<sup>+</sup> 6 2Phosphoenol pyruvic acid → 2Pyruvic acid 2

2NAD<sup>+</sup> → 2NADH → 2NAD<sup>+</sup> 6 2Acetyl CoA → 4CO2 24 **Net:** C6H12O6 + 6O2 → 6CO2 + 6H2O 38

Even though aerobic respiration is the main form of energy generation in organisms, some can generate energy under anaerobic conditions. Under anaerobic conditions, glucose will be converted to pyruvate as it was under aerobic conditions, but in the next stage instead of the Krebs cycle a different pathway will follow-specific to the type of organism viz. prokaryote/ eukaryote. While yeast for instance undergoes alcohol fermentation, some organisms follow

In microbial catabolism under anaerobic conditions, carbohydrates are oxidized without the presence of oxygen. This oxidation reaction gets partially completed inside the microbial cellular structure and with the help of co-enzymes, the electrons and protons are transferred outside the cellular membrane. The overall reaction of a fermentative MFC is given in Equation 4. This reaction can be broken down to half reactions as shown by Equation 5&6. Inside the anaerobic compartment of a MFC, the reaction represented in Equation 4 takes place where

compartment (sometimes via a proton exchange membrane). The released electrons from the anode will go through an external load as shown in Fig.3. and consequently enter the cathode.

C H O + 6O 6CO + 6H O 6 12 6 2 ¾¾® 2 2 (4)

the electrons released will be transferred to anode and the protons (H+

+ - C H O + 6H O 6CO + 24H + 24e 6 12 6 2 ¾¾® <sup>2</sup>

**Reaction Sequence ATP Yield**

) travel to the cathode

**<sup>0</sup> E = 0.014V** (5)

system is given in the Table 2.

18 Technology and Application of Microbial Fuel Cells

2Pyruvic acid → 2Acetyl Co A + 2CO2

the lactic acid fermentation.

**Table 2.** ATP yield for corresponding biochemical reaction(s)

The electron transfer mechanism involves amalgamation of knowledge from electrochemistry, biochemistry and microbiology. Electrons pass on to the electrode of MFC as a result of several irreversible enzymatic reactions and eventually the reversible electrochemical reactions of the electron transport chain [24]. For the reversible interfacial reaction to take place at the anode surface, electrons rely on shuttles such as cytochromes, proteins (such as PQQ), bound or soluble redox mediators to reach atleast within 10 Å proximity of the anode [25].

Several electron transfer mechanisms and processes have been proposed including direct electron transfer, indirect electron transfer and shuttle mediated transfer of electrons. Of the various mechanisms proposed, direct contact mechanism indicates formation of monolayer of microbes on the anode surface enabling direct transfer of electrons to the anode via cell membrane or a membrane organelle. Kim et al. [26] observed that certain Fe(III)-reducing bacteria (*Shewanella putrefaciens*) can transfer electrons to the electrode without the aid of synthetic mediators as shown in Fig.4a. Cytochrome, a redox protein perhaps present on the outer membrane of the cell supposedly causes direct electron transfer by its electrochemical activity of reducing water soluble Fe(III). This type of transfer is capable of producing lowest extracellular potential losses due to the negligible gap between microbe and the electrode. However, the electron transfer in this mechanism is limited by the total number of bacteria in direct contact with anode [27]. Also, the c-type cytochrome may not be present in all the Fe(III) reducing bacteria which further limits the electron transfer to a very few species [28].

Apart from ferric ion reducing bacteria, yeast cells (*Hansenula anomala*) have also been successfully found to enable a direct electrical communication between the cells and anode surface. In this case, electron transfer takes place without any external mediator or any intermediate redox reaction such as Fe(III) reduction, but with the help of redox enzymes,

**Figure 4.** a) Schematic diagram describing direct electron transfer mechanism in MFC [26]; b) CV of yeast biofilm on anode in phosphate buffer at scan rate 50 mV/s. (1) Blank CV; (2 and 3) after successive additions of 0.5 ml each of lactate stock solution [29].

ferricyanide reductase and lactate dehydrogenase that are present on the outer membrane of the yeast cells. As can be seen in Fig.4b., the CV reveals two redox peaks, A and B of the respective redox enzymes that are responsible for the electrochemical activity of the organism. These enzymes get reduced by consuming the electrons that are liberated during the oxidation of the substrate and transfer the electrons to the anode. The CV curves 2 and 3 depict reduction in peak currents upon subsequent addition of substrate indicating direct communication between the enzymes and anode [29].

A recent discovery of interest in the milieu of direct electron transport (DET) mechanism in MFC is the pili growth seen in bacteria (*Geobacter sulfurreducens*). Pili also known as bacterial nanowires, are minute flexible structures made of protein called pillin that help the bacteria to cling to surfaces and distinguish materials in its surroundings. These pili overcome the limitation of the former mechanism by allowing charge transport through multiple layers of biofilms on the anode surface by not only being electrically conductive but also supposedly forming internal networks (see Fig.5.).

The subunit protein, PilA present in pili consists of a cluster of aromatic acids that are believed to play a major role in their conductivity [31, 32]. *Shewanella oneidensis* uses both types of DET mechanisms involving c-type cytochrome and conductive pilus-like nanowires for electron transfer [33, 34]. Conductivity of pili has may be measured using relation (7) given by Mal‐ vankar et al. [30]

$$\mathcal{L}\sigma = G\left(\frac{2a}{\mathcal{S}^L}\right) \tag{7}$$

**Figure 5.** TEM image showing pili formed by the strain KN400 forming an interpenetrating network on the anode

Biochemical and Electrochemical Perspectives of the Anode of a Microbial Fuel Cell

While there have been positive findings on bacterial nanowires toward long-range electron transfer on anode; further in-depth investigations are required to find precisely what feature of the pili facilitates metal-like conductivity in pili and other microbial species that possess this

Although direct contact mechanism is much sought after for electron transfer, extensive research on indirect or mediated electron transfer mechanism indicates that it is a conventional and efficient method for current generation in MFCs [36]. Indirect electron transfer mecha‐ nisms can be categorized based on the type of mediator used to wire the microbial catabolism with anode surface. A good mediator displays high membrane permeability, it is adequately soluble, possesses high electron transfer rate, non-toxic to microbial cells and non-biodegrad‐

MFCs. This is because, electrons always flow from the low redox potential (of mediator) to the high redox potential (of electron acceptor or anode). However, mediators with high redox potentials have superior affinity for drawing electrons from the electron carriers in the cell. Initially artificial redox mediators such as phenazines, phenothiazines, phenoxazines and quinones were used to carry out the electron transfer in the MFC systems. However, there are several disadvantages associated with these mediators that makes their use unsustainable and impractical – low current densities, difficulty in long range electron transfer over thick biofilms, need for regular addition of fresh mediators and toxicity. Hence, it was necessary to employ

the intrinsic production of metabolites in microbes for electron transport purposes.

Microorganisms are capable of producing endogenous metabolites using primary and secondary pathways to carryout various biological processes. Primary metabolites such as H2 [37] and H2S [38] that are produced by microbial catabolic oxidation of fuel (anaerobic respiration and fermentation) have also been successfully used as redox mediators. Some secondary metabolites that have been considered for use in MFC applications are phenazine-1 carboxamide, pyocyanine (*Pseudomonas aeruginosa*) [39], neutral red, anthraquinone-2,6 disulfonate (AQDS), thionine, methyl viologen, methyl blue, humic acid [40] and 2-amino-3-

2-) are said to be favorable for

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/58755

21

able. In theory, mediators with low redox potentials (such as SO4

biofilm [30]

trait [35].

where G is the biofilm conductance, L is electrode length, g is thickness of biofilm and a is the non-conducting gap width between two working electrodes (anode).

**Figure 5.** TEM image showing pili formed by the strain KN400 forming an interpenetrating network on the anode biofilm [30]

While there have been positive findings on bacterial nanowires toward long-range electron transfer on anode; further in-depth investigations are required to find precisely what feature of the pili facilitates metal-like conductivity in pili and other microbial species that possess this trait [35].

ferricyanide reductase and lactate dehydrogenase that are present on the outer membrane of the yeast cells. As can be seen in Fig.4b., the CV reveals two redox peaks, A and B of the respective redox enzymes that are responsible for the electrochemical activity of the organism. These enzymes get reduced by consuming the electrons that are liberated during the oxidation of the substrate and transfer the electrons to the anode. The CV curves 2 and 3 depict reduction in peak currents upon subsequent addition of substrate indicating direct communication

**Figure 4.** a) Schematic diagram describing direct electron transfer mechanism in MFC [26]; b) CV of yeast biofilm on anode in phosphate buffer at scan rate 50 mV/s. (1) Blank CV; (2 and 3) after successive additions of 0.5 ml each of

A recent discovery of interest in the milieu of direct electron transport (DET) mechanism in MFC is the pili growth seen in bacteria (*Geobacter sulfurreducens*). Pili also known as bacterial nanowires, are minute flexible structures made of protein called pillin that help the bacteria to cling to surfaces and distinguish materials in its surroundings. These pili overcome the limitation of the former mechanism by allowing charge transport through multiple layers of biofilms on the anode surface by not only being electrically conductive but also supposedly

The subunit protein, PilA present in pili consists of a cluster of aromatic acids that are believed to play a major role in their conductivity [31, 32]. *Shewanella oneidensis* uses both types of DET mechanisms involving c-type cytochrome and conductive pilus-like nanowires for electron transfer [33, 34]. Conductivity of pili has may be measured using relation (7) given by Mal‐

where G is the biofilm conductance, L is electrode length, g is thickness of biofilm and a is the

*gL* ) (7)

*<sup>σ</sup>* <sup>=</sup>*G*( <sup>2</sup>*<sup>a</sup>*

non-conducting gap width between two working electrodes (anode).

between the enzymes and anode [29].

20 Technology and Application of Microbial Fuel Cells

lactate stock solution [29].

forming internal networks (see Fig.5.).

vankar et al. [30]

Although direct contact mechanism is much sought after for electron transfer, extensive research on indirect or mediated electron transfer mechanism indicates that it is a conventional and efficient method for current generation in MFCs [36]. Indirect electron transfer mecha‐ nisms can be categorized based on the type of mediator used to wire the microbial catabolism with anode surface. A good mediator displays high membrane permeability, it is adequately soluble, possesses high electron transfer rate, non-toxic to microbial cells and non-biodegrad‐ able. In theory, mediators with low redox potentials (such as SO4 2-) are said to be favorable for MFCs. This is because, electrons always flow from the low redox potential (of mediator) to the high redox potential (of electron acceptor or anode). However, mediators with high redox potentials have superior affinity for drawing electrons from the electron carriers in the cell.

Initially artificial redox mediators such as phenazines, phenothiazines, phenoxazines and quinones were used to carry out the electron transfer in the MFC systems. However, there are several disadvantages associated with these mediators that makes their use unsustainable and impractical – low current densities, difficulty in long range electron transfer over thick biofilms, need for regular addition of fresh mediators and toxicity. Hence, it was necessary to employ the intrinsic production of metabolites in microbes for electron transport purposes.

Microorganisms are capable of producing endogenous metabolites using primary and secondary pathways to carryout various biological processes. Primary metabolites such as H2 [37] and H2S [38] that are produced by microbial catabolic oxidation of fuel (anaerobic respiration and fermentation) have also been successfully used as redox mediators. Some secondary metabolites that have been considered for use in MFC applications are phenazine-1 carboxamide, pyocyanine (*Pseudomonas aeruginosa*) [39], neutral red, anthraquinone-2,6 disulfonate (AQDS), thionine, methyl viologen, methyl blue, humic acid [40] and 2-amino-3carboxy-1,4-naphthoquinone (ACNQ) (*Bifidobacterium longum*) [41]. These mediators display cyclic redox behavior, which means that a single molecule can be used continuously for electron transfer to and fro the anode or biofilm. This is not only sustainable but also convenient for long range electron transfer in the anodic biofilms resulting in constant and enhanced generation of current. 14 41 MFC achieved a remarkable MFC which achieved a remarkable

#### **3. Factors that affect performance of microbial fuel cells and potential remedies**

15 1 based on the volume based on volume 15 2 S. oneidensis S. oneidensis

#### **3.1. Polarization losses**

Theoretically, MFC can attain a maximum cell voltage (emf) of 1.1 V under open circuit conditions. However, in reality it undergoes numerous forms of (polarization) losses and can achieve only 0.8 V [42] in open circuit conditions and around 0.62 V [43] during current generation. Overvoltage which is the difference between the theoretical and measured cell voltage collectively represents the overpotentials of the electrodes as wells as the overall ohmic loss of the system [32]. Prominent sources of these overpotentials are the intracellular and extracellular potential losses that occur in the biofilm formed on anode.When the internal resistance is high, there is a significant loss of charge in the system, thus reducing the effective voltage available at the end terminal [7, 44]. Key types of polarization losses (Fig.6.) viz. activation polarization, concentration polarization, ohmic losses and losses due to microbial metabolic activities are discussed in more detail below.

4

**Activation losses**

density.

from the Tafel equation shown by Equation 8.

**• Increasing anode surface area**

the electrode surface porosity and roughness.

ducting pili have relatively low activation polarization.

**• Decreasing the activation loss at the electrode surface**

**• Improving anode-microbe interactions**

**• Increasing the operating temperature**

Usually, to initiate transport of charges liberated by fuel (electron donor) oxidation to the anode (electron acceptor), an energy barrier must be overcome. The energy barrier comprises of an additional potential known as activation overpotential that is required for transfer of electrons from fuel to microbial shuttles and finally to the anode. Activation losses, represented by region A in Fig.6. is observed as a sharp decrease in MFC voltage (low polarization) at the initial low current densities, but it is steadily overshadowed by ohmic and concentration losses which usually occur at intermediate or high current densities (region B in Fig. 6). Clearly, activation losses occur at both anode and the cathode, and it is important to note that the cathodic overpotentials are much larger than anodic overpotentials. With the increased exchange current density this overpotential can be reduced [7, 44]. The activation losses can be explained

0

´D (8)

Biochemical and Electrochemical Perspectives of the Anode of a Microbial Fuel Cell

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/58755

23

Vact = A ( ) *<sup>i</sup> Log <sup>i</sup>*

Some steps that can be taken to minimize the activation losses are:

where ∆Vact: activation overpotential, A: Tafel Slope, i: current density, io: exchange current

Increasing the surface area is a reliable approach to decrease the activation potential as when the surface area is increased the current density gets reduced. This can be done by increasing

In order to decrease the activation losses at the bacteria, it is necessary to improve anodemicrobe interactions. Using the correct mediator would eliminate this problem by enhancing electron transfer. As mediators would go inside the cell membrane it can reduce the intracel‐ lular activation losses as well. MFC systems employing microorganisms that produce con‐

In an inorganic fuel cell raising the temperature would reduce the activation overpotential but in the microbial fuel cell or in the enzymatic fuel cell it is not possible to increase the temper‐

The activation energy at the electrode surface can be decreased by adding catalyst to the electrode. The catalysts that has been widely tested is Pt, which is reported to get polluted by bacterial suspensions. It has been reported that some success has been achieved by coating the

ature unless the bio-reaction section is separate from the anode chamber.

**Figure 6.** The polarization curve for a typical MFC

#### **Activation losses**

carboxy-1,4-naphthoquinone (ACNQ) (*Bifidobacterium longum*) [41]. These mediators display cyclic redox behavior, which means that a single molecule can be used continuously for electron transfer to and fro the anode or biofilm. This is not only sustainable but also convenient for long range electron transfer in the anodic biofilms resulting in constant and enhanced

**3. Factors that affect performance of microbial fuel cells and potential**

14 41 MFC achieved a remarkable MFC which achieved a remarkable

15 1 based on the volume based on volume 15 2 S. oneidensis S. oneidensis

Theoretically, MFC can attain a maximum cell voltage (emf) of 1.1 V under open circuit conditions. However, in reality it undergoes numerous forms of (polarization) losses and can achieve only 0.8 V [42] in open circuit conditions and around 0.62 V [43] during current generation. Overvoltage which is the difference between the theoretical and measured cell voltage collectively represents the overpotentials of the electrodes as wells as the overall ohmic loss of the system [32]. Prominent sources of these overpotentials are the intracellular and extracellular potential losses that occur in the biofilm formed on anode.When the internal resistance is high, there is a significant loss of charge in the system, thus reducing the effective voltage available at the end terminal [7, 44]. Key types of polarization losses (Fig.6.) viz. activation polarization, concentration polarization, ohmic losses and losses due to microbial

> Cathode overpotential

A B C

Theoretical Cathode overpotential

∆E = Overall MFC potential

Theoretical Anode overpotential

Anode

overpotential

4

i

generation of current.

22 Technology and Application of Microbial Fuel Cells

**3.1. Polarization losses**

Vcathode

Vanode

**Figure 6.** The polarization curve for a typical MFC

metabolic activities are discussed in more detail below.

**remedies**

Usually, to initiate transport of charges liberated by fuel (electron donor) oxidation to the anode (electron acceptor), an energy barrier must be overcome. The energy barrier comprises of an additional potential known as activation overpotential that is required for transfer of electrons from fuel to microbial shuttles and finally to the anode. Activation losses, represented by region A in Fig.6. is observed as a sharp decrease in MFC voltage (low polarization) at the initial low current densities, but it is steadily overshadowed by ohmic and concentration losses which usually occur at intermediate or high current densities (region B in Fig. 6). Clearly, activation losses occur at both anode and the cathode, and it is important to note that the cathodic overpotentials are much larger than anodic overpotentials. With the increased exchange current density this overpotential can be reduced [7, 44]. The activation losses can be explained from the Tafel equation shown by Equation 8.

$$
\Delta \mathbf{Vact} = \mathbf{A} \times \text{Log}(\frac{\dot{\mathbf{i}}}{\dot{\mathbf{i}}\_0}) \tag{8}
$$

where ∆Vact: activation overpotential, A: Tafel Slope, i: current density, io: exchange current density.

Some steps that can be taken to minimize the activation losses are:

#### **• Increasing anode surface area**

Increasing the surface area is a reliable approach to decrease the activation potential as when the surface area is increased the current density gets reduced. This can be done by increasing the electrode surface porosity and roughness.

#### **• Improving anode-microbe interactions**

In order to decrease the activation losses at the bacteria, it is necessary to improve anodemicrobe interactions. Using the correct mediator would eliminate this problem by enhancing electron transfer. As mediators would go inside the cell membrane it can reduce the intracel‐ lular activation losses as well. MFC systems employing microorganisms that produce con‐ ducting pili have relatively low activation polarization.

#### **• Increasing the operating temperature**

In an inorganic fuel cell raising the temperature would reduce the activation overpotential but in the microbial fuel cell or in the enzymatic fuel cell it is not possible to increase the temper‐ ature unless the bio-reaction section is separate from the anode chamber.

#### **• Decreasing the activation loss at the electrode surface**

The activation energy at the electrode surface can be decreased by adding catalyst to the electrode. The catalysts that has been widely tested is Pt, which is reported to get polluted by bacterial suspensions. It has been reported that some success has been achieved by coating the electrode with a conducting layer that shield microbes from direct contact with the catalyst material [45]. Immobilization of catalysts such as neutral red (that also acts as a mediator) and manganese oxide on the electrode surface have shown to increase MFC power output. [15, 46]

The loss of potential due to internal current and crossover of reactants would also be significant if the fuel cell is operating at low current densities. Some electrons will pass through membrane rather than through the external circuit. The membrane is impermeable to the oxygen molecule but certain percentage can be diffused into the anode where it reduces the current that can pass through the external circuit.

#### **Ohmic losses**

Ohmic losses depicted as the medium polarization region B in Fig.6. is caused when the flow of charge is hindered as a result of the anodic resistance. The potential drop can be easily represented by ohms law as given in Equation 9 where Ri represent the total internal resistance and I is the circuit current.

$$
\Delta V = I \times Ri \tag{9}
$$

**Losses due to fuel scavenging metabolic processes of microrganisms**

between the electrodes can affect the microbial metabolic losses.

**3.2. Microbial interaction with the anode surface**

microbes is adhered properly onto the anode.

the anode surface [52].

**Role of anode material and architecture**

Loss of voltage can also occur due to catabolic activities of the microbe while deriving energy from fuel oxidation. As discussed earlier in the chapter, in an effective MFC, the anode potential should be as low as possible to allow attainment of high MFC voltage and adequate catabolic energy gain for the survival of microorganisms. Nevertheless, extremely low anode potential can hinder electron transfer causing fermentation of fuel while producing high energy products, resulting in loss of electrons. Furthermore, this also leads to added electron losses by excessive buildup of anodophilic biomass. A number of factors such as type of microbes, community composition, anode-microbe interaction, rate of fuel degradation by the microbes, number of microbes actively degrading the fuel and mix up of fuel through the electrolyte

Biochemical and Electrochemical Perspectives of the Anode of a Microbial Fuel Cell

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/58755

25

The electrical performance of a MFC is largely dependent on how well the microorganisms interact with the anode. A prime requirement here is that the biofilm that comprise of the

Microbial adhesion on anode surface can be understood by the notion of surface charges. Most of the micro-organisms are negatively charged by nature and hence, attract positively charged surfaces. So, several (surface) modification techniques have been employed to facilitate this charge attraction process. For example, treating the anode surface with ammonia has been successfully attempted. Ammonia treatment facilitates the negatively charged bacteria to readily attach to the now positively charged anodes. The power output of the treated anode was expectedly much higher than its non-treated counterpart. However, high temperature requirements and, complex conditions and instrumentation have made this process commer‐ cially less feasible. In a different instance, treatment of activated carbon felt anodes with nitric acid (acid treatment) for rendering positively charged surfaces has resulted in a 58% increase in power density [51]. Zhou et al. reported that electrochemical oxidation of anode led to the change of the anode properties, such as augmented surface area, reduced internal resistance and anode potential, and therefore aided to the microbial adhesion and electron transfer on

Anode material and its architecture directly affects microbial adhesion, electron transfer and fuel oxidation. The noble metal electrodes (Pt, Au, Ag, Pd) have been reported to be less attractive as MFC anodes due to their high cost and weak adhesion of microbes; and other

Carbon-based anodes have been extensively tested for MFC applications as they exhibit superlative properties such as high conductivity, durability, eco-friendliness and their flexibility to be shaped into various architectures. They can have planar, packed or brush like configuration(s). The conventional electrodes include graphite - rod, felt, plate and fiber brush, carbon - felt, cloth and paper, and reticulated vitreous carbon (RVC) [54, 55]. Logan et al. made an observation that packed and brush design of anodes gave higher power output than the

high-performing electrodes (Ni, Cu, Rh, Ir) are being sought as alternatives [53].

Increasing the conductivity of anode material, minimizing contact resistance and the total travel distance of electrons within the anode helps in limiting the ohmic losses. Use of highly conductive anode materials with 3D architecture (eg. 3D graphite felt electrode) has shown to produce higher current generation by overcoming the ohmic losses [47]. The three dimensional structure not only offers a high surface to volume ratio but also an evident increase in the anode-microbe interaction, thus facilitating higher electron transport [48]. Apart from this, resistance caused by the internal connections in the MFC system and the cation exchange membrane against the ionic flux also contributes to ohmic losses. The anodic (electrical) resistance were reported to be negligible when graphite electrodes were used [7] and the contact resistance can also be significantly low as compared to the ionic resistance. Optimizing the electrode spacing, using a low resistance membrane while improving the conductivity and buffer capacity of the electrolyte (tolerable by the microorganism) are concomitant strategies to improve ion transfer through the membrane [49, 50].

#### **Concentration losses**

Imbalance in rate of mass transfer of substrate and products to and from the anode respectively and the total current generated in the system may result in increase in anode potential and decrease in cathode potential or vice versa causing concentration (or mass transport) losses. These losses are most prominent at high current densities due to diffusion-limited mass transfer of fuel to the anode surface. Also, the accumulation of oxidized products and cations in the biofilm may change the redox conditions and alter the metabolic activities of the microbes. Hindrance in cation transport may further cause a pH gradient between the electrodes leading to a significant reduction in the power output. Anode design and opera‐ tional parameters are contributing factors toward concentration losses represented by the maximum polarization region C in Fig.6.

#### **Losses due to fuel scavenging metabolic processes of microrganisms**

Loss of voltage can also occur due to catabolic activities of the microbe while deriving energy from fuel oxidation. As discussed earlier in the chapter, in an effective MFC, the anode potential should be as low as possible to allow attainment of high MFC voltage and adequate catabolic energy gain for the survival of microorganisms. Nevertheless, extremely low anode potential can hinder electron transfer causing fermentation of fuel while producing high energy products, resulting in loss of electrons. Furthermore, this also leads to added electron losses by excessive buildup of anodophilic biomass. A number of factors such as type of microbes, community composition, anode-microbe interaction, rate of fuel degradation by the microbes, number of microbes actively degrading the fuel and mix up of fuel through the electrolyte between the electrodes can affect the microbial metabolic losses.

## **3.2. Microbial interaction with the anode surface**

electrode with a conducting layer that shield microbes from direct contact with the catalyst material [45]. Immobilization of catalysts such as neutral red (that also acts as a mediator) and manganese oxide on the electrode surface have shown to increase MFC power output. [15, 46]

The loss of potential due to internal current and crossover of reactants would also be significant if the fuel cell is operating at low current densities. Some electrons will pass through membrane rather than through the external circuit. The membrane is impermeable to the oxygen molecule but certain percentage can be diffused into the anode where it reduces the current that can

Ohmic losses depicted as the medium polarization region B in Fig.6. is caused when the flow of charge is hindered as a result of the anodic resistance. The potential drop can be easily represented by ohms law as given in Equation 9 where Ri represent the total internal resistance

Increasing the conductivity of anode material, minimizing contact resistance and the total travel distance of electrons within the anode helps in limiting the ohmic losses. Use of highly conductive anode materials with 3D architecture (eg. 3D graphite felt electrode) has shown to produce higher current generation by overcoming the ohmic losses [47]. The three dimensional structure not only offers a high surface to volume ratio but also an evident increase in the anode-microbe interaction, thus facilitating higher electron transport [48]. Apart from this, resistance caused by the internal connections in the MFC system and the cation exchange membrane against the ionic flux also contributes to ohmic losses. The anodic (electrical) resistance were reported to be negligible when graphite electrodes were used [7] and the contact resistance can also be significantly low as compared to the ionic resistance. Optimizing the electrode spacing, using a low resistance membrane while improving the conductivity and buffer capacity of the electrolyte (tolerable by the microorganism) are concomitant strategies

Imbalance in rate of mass transfer of substrate and products to and from the anode respectively and the total current generated in the system may result in increase in anode potential and decrease in cathode potential or vice versa causing concentration (or mass transport) losses. These losses are most prominent at high current densities due to diffusion-limited mass transfer of fuel to the anode surface. Also, the accumulation of oxidized products and cations in the biofilm may change the redox conditions and alter the metabolic activities of the microbes. Hindrance in cation transport may further cause a pH gradient between the electrodes leading to a significant reduction in the power output. Anode design and opera‐ tional parameters are contributing factors toward concentration losses represented by the

D =´ *V I Ri* (9)

pass through the external circuit.

24 Technology and Application of Microbial Fuel Cells

and I is the circuit current.

**Concentration losses**

to improve ion transfer through the membrane [49, 50].

maximum polarization region C in Fig.6.

**Ohmic losses**

The electrical performance of a MFC is largely dependent on how well the microorganisms interact with the anode. A prime requirement here is that the biofilm that comprise of the microbes is adhered properly onto the anode.

Microbial adhesion on anode surface can be understood by the notion of surface charges. Most of the micro-organisms are negatively charged by nature and hence, attract positively charged surfaces. So, several (surface) modification techniques have been employed to facilitate this charge attraction process. For example, treating the anode surface with ammonia has been successfully attempted. Ammonia treatment facilitates the negatively charged bacteria to readily attach to the now positively charged anodes. The power output of the treated anode was expectedly much higher than its non-treated counterpart. However, high temperature requirements and, complex conditions and instrumentation have made this process commer‐ cially less feasible. In a different instance, treatment of activated carbon felt anodes with nitric acid (acid treatment) for rendering positively charged surfaces has resulted in a 58% increase in power density [51]. Zhou et al. reported that electrochemical oxidation of anode led to the change of the anode properties, such as augmented surface area, reduced internal resistance and anode potential, and therefore aided to the microbial adhesion and electron transfer on the anode surface [52].

#### **Role of anode material and architecture**

Anode material and its architecture directly affects microbial adhesion, electron transfer and fuel oxidation. The noble metal electrodes (Pt, Au, Ag, Pd) have been reported to be less attractive as MFC anodes due to their high cost and weak adhesion of microbes; and other high-performing electrodes (Ni, Cu, Rh, Ir) are being sought as alternatives [53].

Carbon-based anodes have been extensively tested for MFC applications as they exhibit superlative properties such as high conductivity, durability, eco-friendliness and their flexibility to be shaped into various architectures. They can have planar, packed or brush like configuration(s). The conventional electrodes include graphite - rod, felt, plate and fiber brush, carbon - felt, cloth and paper, and reticulated vitreous carbon (RVC) [54, 55]. Logan et al. made an observation that packed and brush design of anodes gave higher power output than the planar type anodes by increasing the anode specific surface area and consequently the volumetric density of exoelectrogenic bacteria [55]. Additionally, the brush configuration also has high porosity. The fibrils of the brush anode helps the micro-organisms to hold onto the anode structure. Due to its enhanced conductivity and non-corrosive nature, titanium was found to be a suitable core wire on which the carbon or graphite fibers are wound.

661 W/m3 based on volume of the anode, which is the highest value yet obtained for a MFCs

Biochemical and Electrochemical Perspectives of the Anode of a Microbial Fuel Cell

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/58755

27

In summary, MFCs have tremendous potential to generate electrical energy from chemical energy present in organic fuels primarily for decentralized stationary power generation applications. However, challenges associated with effective mass and charge transport along with the intricacies associated with making the living organisms interact with the inorganic (electrode) world have hampered this technology coming to technological fruition as yet. Advances in material science coupled with nanotechnology may provide novel tools to effectively harvest, transport and utilize electrical charges generated by MFCs for useful

Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department, C Scoates Hall, Texas A&M University,

[1] Keneth, L. Biochemical Fuel Cells. in Symposium on Bioelectrochemistry of Microor‐

[4] Potter, M.C., Bacteria as Agents in the Oxidation of Amorphous Carbon. 1910.

[6] Wingard, L., et al., Bioelectrochemical fuel cells Enzyme Microb. Technol,, 1982.

[9] Bennetto, H.P., Microbial Fuel Cells Life Chemistry Report. 1984. 2: p. 363-453.

[5] Cohen, B., The bacterial culture as an electrical half-cellJournal of Bacteriology, 1931.

[8] Bennetto, H.P., Electricyt generation by Microorganism. Biotechnology Education,

Aishwarya Mahadevan, Duminda A. Gunawardena and Sandun Fernando\*

[2] Mitchell, W., Fuel cells. 1963: Academic press Inc. NewYork.

[7] Barbir, F., Pem Fuel Cells theory and practice. 2005: Elsevier.

[3] Cole, K.S., Membranes, Ions, and Impulses. 1972.

with a pure strain of *S. oneidensis* MR-1.

applications in the forthcoming future.

**4. Conclusion**

**Author details**

College Station, USA

ganisms. 1966.

1990. 1: p. 163-168.

**References**

Lately, nanomaterials have attracted much attention in various fields due to their unusual yet beneficial structural, chemical and electrical properties. Use of nanomaterial for anodes and electron transport has been reported to augment the performance of MFCs. Fan et al. showed that Au and Pd nanoparticle decorated anodes produced enhanced current densities than that of the control electrodes. They also observed that the anodic performance was significantly affected by not only the chemical composition of nanoparticles but also their size and shape [56]. In 2012, Xu et al. tested Fe nanoparticle-decorated graphite disks which resulted in approximately six-fold higher average current densities than the plain graphite anode. Upon running a whole genome microarray analysis of the gene expression of *Shewanella oneidensis* used in this study, they found out that genes encoding biofilm formation were significantly up-regulated as a response to nanoparticle-decoration [57]. However, it should also be noted that the probable cytotoxicity of certain nanoparticles often limit the possibilities that can be reached using nano-materials for MFC applications.

Coating the anode surface with materials such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs), conductive polymers and nanopolymer composites are other methods used for anode surface modifica‐ tion. Conductive polymer based anodes utilizing polypyrrole [58], poly(3-hydroxy butyrateco-3-hydroxyvalerate) [59], nanowire networks [60] and nano/-composites of the polymers [61, 62, 63] have been studied and found to significantly increase MFC performance.

Recent studies show that CNTs are promising electrode materials due their high surface area, superior electrical conductivity, chemical inertness, decreased startup time and low internal resistance [64]. Functionalizing the CNTs appropriately, may further enhance electron transport. Mink et al. [65] made observations on a forest type multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) with a nickel silicide contact area that produced current density of 197 mA/m2 and power density of 392 mW/m3 . MWCNTs were said to have increased the anode surface-tovolume ratio, which improved the ability of the microbes to couple and transfer electrons to the anode. Nickel silicide were reported to boost the output current by providing a low resistance contact area that allowed efficient shuttling of electrons.

A three dimensional architecture that facilitates augmented growth of the microbes can be achieved by embedding CNTs on carbon cloth and polyester fabric using doping techniques. Also, the CNT coating stimulates active surface interactions with the microbes enabling direct electron transfer thereby giving 68% high power density and 10-fold-lower charge-transfer resistance than the traditional carbon cloth based anodes [48]. Yet another advancement in the three dimensional anodes was the 3D conducting graphene–polyaniline framework that was reported to outperform the planar carbon electrode by additionally providing multiplexed and highly conductive pathways [66]. Wang et al. [67] developed a 3D reduced graphene oxide– nickel foam as an anode for MFC which achieved a remarkable volumetric power density of 661 W/m3 based on volume of the anode, which is the highest value yet obtained for a MFCs with a pure strain of *S. oneidensis* MR-1.

## **4. Conclusion**

planar type anodes by increasing the anode specific surface area and consequently the volumetric density of exoelectrogenic bacteria [55]. Additionally, the brush configuration also has high porosity. The fibrils of the brush anode helps the micro-organisms to hold onto the anode structure. Due to its enhanced conductivity and non-corrosive nature, titanium was

Lately, nanomaterials have attracted much attention in various fields due to their unusual yet beneficial structural, chemical and electrical properties. Use of nanomaterial for anodes and electron transport has been reported to augment the performance of MFCs. Fan et al. showed that Au and Pd nanoparticle decorated anodes produced enhanced current densities than that of the control electrodes. They also observed that the anodic performance was significantly affected by not only the chemical composition of nanoparticles but also their size and shape [56]. In 2012, Xu et al. tested Fe nanoparticle-decorated graphite disks which resulted in approximately six-fold higher average current densities than the plain graphite anode. Upon running a whole genome microarray analysis of the gene expression of *Shewanella oneidensis* used in this study, they found out that genes encoding biofilm formation were significantly up-regulated as a response to nanoparticle-decoration [57]. However, it should also be noted that the probable cytotoxicity of certain nanoparticles often limit the possibilities that can be

Coating the anode surface with materials such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs), conductive polymers and nanopolymer composites are other methods used for anode surface modifica‐ tion. Conductive polymer based anodes utilizing polypyrrole [58], poly(3-hydroxy butyrateco-3-hydroxyvalerate) [59], nanowire networks [60] and nano/-composites of the polymers [61,

Recent studies show that CNTs are promising electrode materials due their high surface area, superior electrical conductivity, chemical inertness, decreased startup time and low internal resistance [64]. Functionalizing the CNTs appropriately, may further enhance electron transport. Mink et al. [65] made observations on a forest type multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) with a nickel silicide contact area that produced current density of 197 mA/m2 and

volume ratio, which improved the ability of the microbes to couple and transfer electrons to the anode. Nickel silicide were reported to boost the output current by providing a low

A three dimensional architecture that facilitates augmented growth of the microbes can be achieved by embedding CNTs on carbon cloth and polyester fabric using doping techniques. Also, the CNT coating stimulates active surface interactions with the microbes enabling direct electron transfer thereby giving 68% high power density and 10-fold-lower charge-transfer resistance than the traditional carbon cloth based anodes [48]. Yet another advancement in the three dimensional anodes was the 3D conducting graphene–polyaniline framework that was reported to outperform the planar carbon electrode by additionally providing multiplexed and highly conductive pathways [66]. Wang et al. [67] developed a 3D reduced graphene oxide– nickel foam as an anode for MFC which achieved a remarkable volumetric power density of

. MWCNTs were said to have increased the anode surface-to-

62, 63] have been studied and found to significantly increase MFC performance.

resistance contact area that allowed efficient shuttling of electrons.

found to be a suitable core wire on which the carbon or graphite fibers are wound.

reached using nano-materials for MFC applications.

26 Technology and Application of Microbial Fuel Cells

power density of 392 mW/m3

In summary, MFCs have tremendous potential to generate electrical energy from chemical energy present in organic fuels primarily for decentralized stationary power generation applications. However, challenges associated with effective mass and charge transport along with the intricacies associated with making the living organisms interact with the inorganic (electrode) world have hampered this technology coming to technological fruition as yet. Advances in material science coupled with nanotechnology may provide novel tools to effectively harvest, transport and utilize electrical charges generated by MFCs for useful applications in the forthcoming future.

## **Author details**

Aishwarya Mahadevan, Duminda A. Gunawardena and Sandun Fernando\*

Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department, C Scoates Hall, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA

## **References**


[10] Aston, W.J. and T.A.P. F, Biosensors and Biofuel cells. Biotechnology General Engi‐ neering Review, 1984: p. 89-120.

[24] Busalmen, J.P., A. Esteve-Nuñez, and J.M. Feliu, Whole cell electrochemistry of elec‐ tricity-producing microorganisms evidence an adaptation for optimal exocellular electron transport. Environmental science & technology, 2008. 42(7): p. 2445-2450. [25] LaBelle, E. and D. Bond, Cyclic voltammetry for the study of microbial electron transfer at electrodes. Bioelectrochemical systems: from extracellular electron transfer

Biochemical and Electrochemical Perspectives of the Anode of a Microbial Fuel Cell

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/58755

29

[26] Kim, H.J., et al., A mediator-less microbial fuel cell using a metal reducing bacterium, Shewanella putrefaciens. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2002. 30(2): p. 145-152.

[27] Torres, C.I., et al., A kinetic perspective on extracellular electron transfer by anode-

[28] Lovley, D.R., et al., Fe (III) and S0 reduction by Pelobacter carbinolicus. Applied and

[29] Prasad, D., et al., Direct electron transfer with yeast cells and construction of a medi‐ atorless microbial fuel cell. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2007. 22(11): p. 2604-2610.

[30] Malvankar, N.S., et al., Tunable metallic-like conductivity in microbial nanowire net‐

[31] Reardon, P.N. and K.T. Mueller, Structure of the Type IVa Major Pilin from the Elec‐ trically Conductive Bacterial Nanowires of Geobacter sulfurreducens. Journal of Bio‐

[32] Reguera, G., et al., Extracellular electron transfer via microbial nanowires. Nature,

[33] Lies, D.P., et al., Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 uses overlapping pathways for iron re‐ duction at a distance and by direct contact under conditions relevant for biofilms.

[34] Gorby, Y.A., et al., Electrically conductive bacterial nanowires produced by Shewa‐ nella oneidensis strain MR-1 and other microorganisms. Proceedings of the National

[35] Malvankar, N.S. and D.R. Lovley, Microbial nanowires: a new paradigm for biologi‐ cal electron transfer and bioelectronics. ChemSusChem, 2012. 5(6): p. 1039-1046. [36] Schröder, U., Anodic electron transfer mechanisms in microbial fuel cells and their energy efficiency. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2007. 9(21): p. 2619-2629. [37] Sekoai, P.T. and E.B. Gueguim Kana, Semi-pilot scale production of hydrogen from Organic Fraction of Solid Municipal Waste and electricity generation from process ef‐

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2005. 71(8): p. 4414-4426.

respiring bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 2010. 34(1): p. 3-17.

to biotechnological application, 2009: p. 137-152.

environmental microbiology, 1995. 61(6): p. 2132-2138.

works. nature nanotechnology, 2011. 6(9): p. 573-579.

logical Chemistry, 2013. 288(41): p. 29260-29266.

Academy of Sciences, 2006. 103(30): p. 11358-11363.

fluents. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2014. 60(0): p. 156-163.

2005. 435(7045): p. 1098-1101.


[24] Busalmen, J.P., A. Esteve-Nuñez, and J.M. Feliu, Whole cell electrochemistry of elec‐ tricity-producing microorganisms evidence an adaptation for optimal exocellular electron transport. Environmental science & technology, 2008. 42(7): p. 2445-2450.

[10] Aston, W.J. and T.A.P. F, Biosensors and Biofuel cells. Biotechnology General Engi‐

[11] Cooney, M.J., R. E, and M.I. W, Physiologic Studies with the sulfate-reducing bacteri‐ um Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Enzyme Microb. Technol,, 1996. 18(5): p. 358-365. [12] Scholz, F. and U. Schroder, Bacterial Batteries. Nature Biotechnology, 2003. 21(10): p.

[13] Tender, L.M., et al., Harnesssing microbially generated power on the seafloor. Natu‐

[14] Roller, S.D., et al., Electron transfer coupling in microbial fuel-cells 1. Comparison of redox-mediator reduction rates and respiratory rates of bacteria. J. Chemical Tech‐

[15] Park, D.H. and J.G. Zeikus, Improved fuel cell and electrode designs for produsing electricity from microbial degradation. Bioenergy and Biotechnology, 2003. 81(3): p.

[16] Willner, I., et al., Biofuel cell based on glucose oxidase and microperoxidase-11 mon‐ olayer functionalized electrode. J. Chemical Soc.-Perkin Trans., 1998. 2(8): p.

[17] Delaney, G.M., Bennetto, H. P., Mason, J. R., Roller, S. D., Stirling, J. L. and Thurston, C. F., Electron-transfer coupling in microbial fuel-cells 2. Performance of fuel-cells containing selected microorganism mediator substrate combinations. J. Chem. Tech‐

[18] Gil, G.C., et al., Operational parameters affecting the performance of a mediator-less

[19] Chaudhuri, S.K.a.L., D. R., Electricity generation by direct oxidation of glucose in mediatorless microbial fuel cells. Nat. Biotechnol. vol. 21: pp.1229-1232.. Natural Bio‐

[20] Wang, H.-Y. and J.-Y. Su, Membraneless microfluidic microbial fuel cell for rapid de‐ tection of electrochemical activity of microorganism. Bioresource Technology, 2013.

[21] Fraiwan, A., D.F. Call, and S. Choi, Bacterial growth and respiration in laminar flow microbial fuel cells. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2014. 6(2): p.-. [22] Gunawardena, A., S. Fernando, and F. To, Performance of a yeast-mediated biologi‐ cal fuel cell. International journal of molecular sciences, 2008. 9(10): p. 1893-1907. [23] White, A., P. HAndler, and E.L. Smith, Principles of Biochemistry, ed. 5. 1973:

microbial fuel cell.Biosens. Bioelectron., 2003. 18(4): p. 327-334.

neering Review, 1984: p. 89-120.

28 Technology and Application of Microbial Fuel Cells

ral Biotechnology, 2002. 20(8): p. 821-825.

nology Biotechnology, 1984. 34B: p. 3-12.

nol. Biotechnol., 198434(1): p. 13-27.

technology, 2003. 21: p. 1229-1232.

145(0): p. 271-274.

McGraw Hill.

1151-1152.

348-355.

1817-1822.


[38] Straub, K.L. and B. Schink, Ferrihydrite-dependent growth of Sulfurospirillum dele‐ yianum through electron transfer via sulfur cycling. Applied and environmental mi‐ crobiology, 2004. 70(10): p. 5744-5749.

[51] Zhu, N., et al., Improved performance of membrane free single-chamber air-cathode microbial fuel cells with nitric acid and ethylenediamine surface modified activated

Biochemical and Electrochemical Perspectives of the Anode of a Microbial Fuel Cell

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/58755

31

[52] Zhou, M., et al., Anode modification by electrochemical oxidation: A new practical method to improve the performance of microbial fuel cells. Biochemical Engineering

[53] kumar, G.G., V.G.S. Sarathi, and K.S. Nahm, Recent advances and challenges in the anode architecture and their modifications for the applications of microbial fuel cells.

[54] Vargas, I.T., I.U. Albert, and J.M. Regan, Spatial distribution of bacterial communities on volumetric and planar anodes in single-chamber air-cathode microbial fuel cells.

[55] Logan, B., et al., Graphite Fiber Brush Anodes for Increased Power Production in Air-Cathode Microbial Fuel Cells. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007. 41(9):

[56] Fan, Y., et al., Nanoparticle decorated anodes for enhanced current generation in mi‐ crobial electrochemical cells. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2011. 26(5): p. 1908-1912.

[57] Xu, S., et al., Enhanced performance and mechanism study of microbial electrolysis cells using Fe nanoparticle-decorated anodes. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnol‐

[58] Feng, C., et al., A dual-chamber microbial fuel cell with conductive film-modified anode and cathode and its application for the neutral electro-Fenton process. Electro‐

[59] Luckarift, H.R., et al., Facile Fabrication of Scalable, Hierarchically Structured Poly‐ mer/Carbon Architectures for Bioelectrodes. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces,

[60] Zhao, Y., et al., Hydroxylated and aminated polyaniline nanowire networks for im‐ proving anode performance in microbial fuel cells. Journal of Bioscience and Bioen‐

[61] Yuan, Y. and S. Kim, Improved performance of a microbial fuel cell with polypyr‐ role/carbon black composite coated carbon paper anodes. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc,

[62] Higgins, S.R., et al., Fabrication of macroporous chitosan scaffolds doped with car‐ bon nanotubes and their characterization in microbial fuel cell operation. Enzyme

carbon fiber felt anodes. Bioresource Technology, 2011. 102(1): p. 422-426.

Journal, 2012. 60(0): p. 151-155.

p. 3341-3346.

ogy, 2012. 93(2): p. 871-880.

2012. 4(4): p. 2082-2087.

2008. 29(7): p. 1345.

gineering, 2011. 112(1): p. 63-66.

and Microbial Technology, 2011. 48(6–7): p. 458-465.

chimica Acta, 2010. 55(6): p. 2048-2054.

Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2013. 43(0): p. 461-475.

Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2013. 110(11): p. 3059-3062.


[51] Zhu, N., et al., Improved performance of membrane free single-chamber air-cathode microbial fuel cells with nitric acid and ethylenediamine surface modified activated carbon fiber felt anodes. Bioresource Technology, 2011. 102(1): p. 422-426.

[38] Straub, K.L. and B. Schink, Ferrihydrite-dependent growth of Sulfurospirillum dele‐ yianum through electron transfer via sulfur cycling. Applied and environmental mi‐

[39] Luo, H., et al., [Isolation and characterization of electrochemical active bacterial Pseu‐ domonas aeruginosa strain RE7]. Huan jing ke xue=Huanjing kexue/ [bian ji, Zhong‐ guo ke xue yuan huan jing ke xue wei yuan hui" Huan jing ke xue" bian ji wei yuan

[40] Thygesen, A., et al., The effect of different substrates and humic acid on power gen‐ eration in microbial fuel cell operation. Bioresource Technology, 2009. 100(3): p.

[41] Yamazaki, S.-i., et al., Role of 2-amino-3-carboxy-1,4-naphthoquinone, a strong growth stimulator for bifidobacteria, as an electron transfer mediator for NAD(P)+re‐ generation in Bifidobacterium longum. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-General

[42] Liu, H., S. Cheng, and B.E. Logan, Production of Electricity from Acetate or Butyrate Using a Single-Chamber Microbial Fuel Cell. Environmental Science & Technology,

[43] Rabaey, K., et al., Tubular Microbial Fuel Cells for Efficient Electricity Generation.

[45] Schröder, U., Niessen, J. and Scholz, F., A generation of microbial fuel cells with cur‐ rent outputs boosted by more than one order of magnitude.. Angewandte Chemien‐

[46] Rhoads, A., H. Beyenal, and Z. Lewandowski, Microbial Fuel Cell using anaerobic respiration as an anodic reaction and biomineralized manganese as a cathodic reac‐

[47] Aelterman, P., et al., Loading rate and external resistance control the electricity gen‐ eration of microbial fuel cells with different three-dimensional anodes. Bioresource

[48] Xie, X., et al., Three-Dimensional Carbon Nanotube−Textile Anode for High-Per‐

[49] Rozendal, R.A., et al., Towards practical implementation of bioelectrochemical

[50] Logan, B.E., et al., Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology. Environmental

Environmental Science & Technology, 2005. 39(20): p. 8077-8082.

[44] Larminie, J.D., A., Fuel cell systems explained. 2000: John Wiley & Sons,.

tant. Environmental Science and Technology, 2005. 39: p. 4666-4671.

formance Microbial Fuel Cells. Nano Letters, 2010. 11(1): p. 291-296.

wastewater treatment. Trends in biotechnology, 2008. 26(8): p. 450-459.

crobiology, 2004. 70(10): p. 5744-5749.

hui.], 2009. 30(7): p. 2118-2123.

30 Technology and Application of Microbial Fuel Cells

Subjects, 1999. 1428(2–3): p. 241-250.

ternational Edition. 2003. 42(25): p. 2880-2883.

Technology, 2008. 99(18): p. 8895-8902.

science & technology, 2006. 40(17): p. 5181-5192.

2004. 39(2): p. 658-662.

1186-1191.


[63] Kalathil, S., et al., Enhanced Performance of a Microbial Fuel Cell Using CNT/MnO2 Nanocomposites as a Bioanode Materials. Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnolo‐ gy, 2013. 13: p. 7712-7716.

**Chapter 3**

**The Anode Biocatalyst**

**Metals Pollution Control**

Oleksandr Bilyy, Oresta Vasyliv and

Additional information is available at the end of the chapter

The need for reducing dependence on fossil fuels and the promoting the use of renewable fuels requires the development of alternative sources such as waste biomass for environmental benefits and alternative global energy supplies [1]. Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) provide new opportunities for the sustainable production of energy from biodegradable and reduced compounds, and thus, have attracted substantial research efforts to develop various devices for generating electricity and removing wastes [1, 2]. The development of processes that can use bacteria to produce electricity represents a highly effective method for bioenergy produc‐ tion as the bacteria are self-replicating, and thus the catalysts of organic matter oxidation are self-sustaining [2]. The substrates used in MFCs range from carbohydrates (e.g. glucose, sucrose, cellulose, starch), volatile fatty acids (e.g. formate, acetate, butyrate), alcohols (e.g. ethanol, methanol), amino acids, proteins and even inorganic components such as sulfides or acid mine drainages [2, 3-9]. The type of substrate fed to a MFC potentially has an impact on the structure and composition of the microbial community. Untill now, no clear image of the effect of the type of substrate on electricity generation by the microbial fuel cells is available.

Analysis of external resistances, electron donor concentrations, cell densities, rates of electron transfer to electrodes at various voltages, and anode potentials can aid in understanding the power production capabilities using microorganisms [10]. A simplified model for the conver‐

> © 2014 The Author(s). Licensee InTech. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

sion of complex organic fuels to electricity is shown in figure 1 [10].

Svitlana Hnatush

**1. Introduction**

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/58347

**with Simultaneous Transition**


**Chapter 3**
