Evrim Umut

[14] Liu M, Liu B, Shao Y. Optimization of the UO2 kernel coating process by 2D simula‐ tion of spouted bed dynamics in the coater. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 2012b;

[15] Duarte CR, Olazar M, Murata VV, Barrozo MAS. Numerical simulation and experi‐ mental study of fluid-particle flows in a spouted bed. Powder Technology. 2009;

[16] Lopes NEC, Moris VAS, Taranto OP. Analysis of spouted bed pressure fluctuations during particle coating. Chemical Engineering and Processing. 2009; 48(6): 1129-1134.

[17] Xu JA, Bao XJ, Wei WS, Shi G, Shen SK, Bi HT, et al. Statistical and frequency analy‐ sis of pressure fluctuations in spouted beds. Powder Technology. 2004; 140(1-2):

[18] Liu M, Shao Y, Liu B. Pressure analysis in the fabrication process of TRISO UO2-coat‐

[19] Zhong WQ, Chen XP, Zhang MY. Hydrodynamic characteristics of spout-fluid bed: Pressure drop and minimum spouting/spout-fluidizing velocity. Chemical Engineer‐

[20] Zhou J, Bruns DD, Finney CEA, Daw CS, Pannala S, Mccollum DL. Hydrodynamic Correlations with Experimental Results from Cold Mockup Spouted Beds for Nucle‐

[21] Sathiyamoorthy D, Rao VG, Rao PT, Mollick PK. Development of pyrolytic carbon coated zirconia pebbles in a high temperature spouted bed. Indian Journal of Engi‐

ed fuel particle. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 2012c; 250: 277-283.

ar Fuel Particle Coating. AIChE Annual Meeting. 2005.

neering and Materials Sciences. 2007; 17(5): 349-52.

251: 124-130.

184 Modern Surface Engineering Treatments

188(3): 195-205.

141-154.

ing Journal. 2006; 118(1-2): 37-46.

Additional information is available at the end of the chapter

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55746
