**Coproducts of Biofuel Industries in Value-Added Biomaterials Uses: A Move Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy**

S. Vivekanandhan, N. Zarrinbakhsh, M. Misra and A. K. Mohanty

Additional information is available at the end of the chapter

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55382

#### **1. Introduction**

Worldpopulationis expectedtogrownearly9billionin2040andeventuallyincreases theglobal energy demand by 30% compared to current conception [1]. The issues related to increasing trend of crude oil cost, depleting source of fossil fuels and emerging threat on greenhouse gas emissionsareleadingtheglobalenergysectortoundergoafundamentaltransformationtowards renewable energy sources [1-2]. As the result, a main focus is motivated on renewable energy technologies that are basedonsolar, windandbiofuels.Intransportationpoint ofview, biofuels receive extensive attention due to their versatility in storage and refilling. Both bioethanol and biodiesel come together as biofuel currently produced from renewable resources through two different pathways. In some countries like Brazil, biofuels are produced and marketed at competitive cost comparedtopetroleum-basedfuels employingexistingtechnology[3-4].They also carry following advantages comparing to petro fuels; (i) create significantly less pollu‐ tants (SOx and NOx), which also mitigates CO2 emission, (ii) biodegradable nature lead to the less environmentalleak risk and(iii)provides betterlubricant effect, whichenhances the engine life[5].Inaddition,theseemergingbiofueltechnologieswillbeexpectedtocreatemoreeconomic benefits to agriculture sectors and new rural job opportunities. Moreover, biofuels are attrac‐ tive options for future energy demand since they can be produced domestically by many countries while the respective retail and consumer infrastructure needs minimum modifica‐ tion; so does the existing engine and fueling technology [6].

However, biofuel foresees a challenging journey to benefit from its highest potentials and to guarantee a viable future. Primarily, it needs policy support and commercialization. At the

© 2013 Vivekanandhan et al.; licensee InTech. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. © 2013 Vivekanandhan et al.; licensee InTech. This is a paper distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

same time, research and development is crucial to conquer the challenges and bring sustain‐ ability to biorefinery facilities [7]. Major motivation for biofuels usage arises from the execution of biofuel policies by many countries, which mandates the incorporation of bio-counterpart into traditional fuels. United Kingdom introduced the Renewable Transport Fuels Obligation (RTFO) and encouraged the oil suppliers to incorporate biofuel into transport fuel between 2.5 and 5% during 2008-2010. RTFO's ultimate aim is to increase this 5% upto 10% by 2020, which will reflect in the demand of minimum 5 million tonnes [8]. Renewable fuel blending mandates in Canada was implemented through Canadian Environmental Protection Act, which recom‐ mends 5% ethanol with gasoline (in 2010) and 2% biodiesel with diesel (in 2012) [9]. In South Africa, the National Biofuels Industrial Strategy was introduced by the government in 2007, which recommends the implementation of 2% biofuels into liquid road transport fuels by 2013 [10]. Currently India's ~80% crude oil demand is satisfied by foreign suppliers, which is projected to rise 90% in 2025. In order to reduce this foreign dependency, India has announced the target of ethanol blending with gasoline 20% by 2017 [11]. In biofuel production, China has clear production goals to meet emerging demand in near future. China's integrated biofuel polices (rural welfare, improved energy security, reduced fossil fuel dependence, and CO2 emissions) aimed to meet ~ 15% of the total transportation fuel demand by 2020 [12]. In Malaysia, the National Biofuel Policy initially planned to proceed with 5% biodiesel blend with 95% petroleum diesel, which is similar to Europe's B5, which has been started from 2009. This will be implemented through short, medium and long term strategies aiming to reduce their petroleum imports [13]. In addition to that, many countries have already designed various incentive programs for the effective promotion of biofuel production including bioethanol and biodiesel. This implements 5-20% biofuel supplement into traditional fuels [14].

considered; soil erosion may worsen by expanding the biomass production, reduction of environmental land affects biodiversity and more pesticides and fertilizers may be used. Thus, the sustainability of biofuel is not achieved solely by a positive net energy balance [6]. In spite of all raised issues, it is important to bear in mind that biofuel still offers its advantages even if it has a small contribution compared to fossil fuels. In this regard, the two main challenges in biomass production can be (a) developing crops with suitable physical and chemical traits for biofuel production and (b) increasing biomass yields (double or more) [7]. How to put these two different strands into an integrated production strategy is important and brings new research topics into the whole agriculture picture. The outcome of such productivity-enhanc‐ ing innovations, research and development motivated by biofuel can be such that by 2050, the whole world population could be supplied enough diet while less cropland is used than today [6]. The respective biorefinery operation also needs improvements so that sugars can be produced from cellulosic biomass and fermented economically feasible and able to compete with production from corn and sugar. These include improvement in lignocellulosic pretreat‐ ment, reduction in enzyme (cellulase) cost, both cellulase production and ethanol fermentation

Coproducts of Biofuel Industries in Value-Added Biomaterials Uses: A Move Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55382

493

In general, the growth of biofuel industry consists of (i) increased production capacity and (ii) successful transformation of industrial technology from discrete batch method (small-scale) into continuous flow method (larger-scale) [16]. In most of the small scale manufacturing, the industries do not have the practice of collecting coproducts, thus they run with increased operating costs. Hence, larger-scale industries are keen in capturing their coproducts in order to reuse them in the production process, which results in the reduction of operating cost significantly. Thus, value-added processing may serve as a viable alternative that not only reduces the impact on the environment, but also generates additional revenue source for biofuel plants [17]. Sustainable bioeconomy road map that integrates renewable resources, biofuel production/ utilization and the value-addition to the respective coproducts is shown schematically in Figure 1. In recent years, biofuel coproducts have been utilised for the fabrication of various chemicals for diversified applications and used as the filler/reinforce‐ ment for polymer blends as well as composites. The emerging opportunities for the biofuel coproducts in biomaterials (polymers/ composites) applications make successive transforma‐ tion of coproducts to renewable feedstock with economic benefits. Capitalizing this transfor‐ mation enhances the economic viability and also the sustainability of biofuel industries. Thus, this chapter summarizes the various aspects in biomaterial applications of the biofuel copro‐

by using modified microorganisms [7].

ducts and their role in sustainable bioeconomy.

**2.1. The global biofuel industry status**

**2. Current status of coproducts from biofuel industries**

The biofuel industry has been growing rapidly during recent years and continues to expand for the next decade. Such expansion is basically driven by renewable energy goals and different policy supports as for example use mandates, tax relief, fuel quality specifications and investment capacities in leading producing countries [18]. Based on the projection reported by

Such blending mandates of biofuels adopted by the E.U. and U.S. created a dispute of increased food prices. Besides, the contribution of corn bioethanol in addressing the global warming issues is very modest while having a small positive net energy balance; i.e. the energy return on investment (EROI) of corn bioethanol is low (=1.2-1.6) compared to oil (=9) [6]. The emerging challenges for 1st generation of biofuel industries that utilizes corn and soybean as a major feed stock for biofuel production motivated the search for non-food and more efficient energy feedstocks like jatropha, lignocellulosic biomass and algae. Among them, cellulosic matter will be the major feedstock for second generation biofuel, since it exhibits much higher yield per hectare in comparison with sugar or starch crops [6]. As a result, cellulosic biomass can potentially yield higher land fuel (135 GJ/ha) than corn kernel (85 GJ/ha) and soy (18 GJ/ha) [15]. Moreover, significantly higher carbon sequestration is another advantage of the use of cellulosic biomass in biofuel production compared to the first generation biofuel crops [6].

This biomass-biofuel conversion can be performed under three major classes and they are (i) conversion of renewable polysaccharides into sugar molecules and their effective fermentation into ethanol, (ii) syngas production and their bio/chemical conversion into alcohols and (iii) production of bio-oil though fast-pyrolysis and their upgrade into transportation fuels. Considering the lignocellulosic feedstock as the biofuel precursor, it is crucial to create the necessary infrastructure in many levels from biomass to biofuel production; agriculture– technology–policy. The new utilization of biomass would largely affect the agriculture sector and necessitates effective actions to ease the adaptation process. Biofuel production uses land which keeps it from food production and environmental preservation. Other issues might be considered; soil erosion may worsen by expanding the biomass production, reduction of environmental land affects biodiversity and more pesticides and fertilizers may be used. Thus, the sustainability of biofuel is not achieved solely by a positive net energy balance [6]. In spite of all raised issues, it is important to bear in mind that biofuel still offers its advantages even if it has a small contribution compared to fossil fuels. In this regard, the two main challenges in biomass production can be (a) developing crops with suitable physical and chemical traits for biofuel production and (b) increasing biomass yields (double or more) [7]. How to put these two different strands into an integrated production strategy is important and brings new research topics into the whole agriculture picture. The outcome of such productivity-enhanc‐ ing innovations, research and development motivated by biofuel can be such that by 2050, the whole world population could be supplied enough diet while less cropland is used than today [6]. The respective biorefinery operation also needs improvements so that sugars can be produced from cellulosic biomass and fermented economically feasible and able to compete with production from corn and sugar. These include improvement in lignocellulosic pretreat‐ ment, reduction in enzyme (cellulase) cost, both cellulase production and ethanol fermentation by using modified microorganisms [7].

In general, the growth of biofuel industry consists of (i) increased production capacity and (ii) successful transformation of industrial technology from discrete batch method (small-scale) into continuous flow method (larger-scale) [16]. In most of the small scale manufacturing, the industries do not have the practice of collecting coproducts, thus they run with increased operating costs. Hence, larger-scale industries are keen in capturing their coproducts in order to reuse them in the production process, which results in the reduction of operating cost significantly. Thus, value-added processing may serve as a viable alternative that not only reduces the impact on the environment, but also generates additional revenue source for biofuel plants [17]. Sustainable bioeconomy road map that integrates renewable resources, biofuel production/ utilization and the value-addition to the respective coproducts is shown schematically in Figure 1. In recent years, biofuel coproducts have been utilised for the fabrication of various chemicals for diversified applications and used as the filler/reinforce‐ ment for polymer blends as well as composites. The emerging opportunities for the biofuel coproducts in biomaterials (polymers/ composites) applications make successive transforma‐ tion of coproducts to renewable feedstock with economic benefits. Capitalizing this transfor‐ mation enhances the economic viability and also the sustainability of biofuel industries. Thus, this chapter summarizes the various aspects in biomaterial applications of the biofuel copro‐ ducts and their role in sustainable bioeconomy.

#### **2. Current status of coproducts from biofuel industries**

#### **2.1. The global biofuel industry status**

The biofuel industry has been growing rapidly during recent years and continues to expand for the next decade. Such expansion is basically driven by renewable energy goals and different policy supports as for example use mandates, tax relief, fuel quality specifications and investment capacities in leading producing countries [18]. Based on the projection reported by

expand in the latter projected years reaching up to more than 4 billion liter in 2020. This is far less than the respective value for the first generation ethanol. The rest feedstocks include wheat (3.9%), molasse (3.2%), non-agricultural feedstock (2.6%), sugar beet (2%) and other (5.8%) [20].

Coproducts of Biofuel Industries in Value-Added Biomaterials Uses: A Move Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55382

495

Similar trend has been presented for biodiesel as illustrated in Figure 2 [21]. The growth in this industry in 2020 is projected to be almost 138% compared to 2008-2010 period on average; an increase from 17.6 to 41.9 billion liter. Vegetable oils will contribute more than 78% as the main feedstocks for biodiesel production. The application of non-food oils such as jatropha in biodiesel production still remains very less as compared with the contribution of vegetable oils such as soybean and palm oil. Feedstocks other than edible oils in biodiesel production include non-agriculture feeds (12.3%), biomass-based (6%) and jatropha oil (3.2%) (Figure 3) [22]. The huge impact of such expansion in biofuel industry on the respective coproducts is incontestable. Based on the feedstock share in the biofuel production by 2020, the major coproducts of different sectors of the biofuel industry can be listed as dried distillers' grains with solubles (DDGS) from dry mill corn ethanol, corn gluten meal and corn gluten feed from wet mill corn ethanol, bagasse from sugarcane ethanol, lignin from second generation lignocellulosic ethanol, and soy meal and crude glycerol from biodiesel. More focus on these

**Figure 3.** The global biofuel production by feedstocks contribution (%) in 2020 (redrawn from data reported in [20, 22]).

coproducts will be dedicated in the following sections.

**Figure 1.** Sustainable bioeconomy roadmap.

**Figure 2.** Development of global biofuel industry (drawn from data reported in [19, 21]).

the OECD (organization for economic co-operation and development) – FAO (food and agriculture organization of the united nations) Agricultural Outlook for the 2011-2020 period, the global bioethanol industry will be growing almost 68% from an average of 92 billion liter in the 2008-2010 period to 155 billion liter in 2020 (Figure 2) [19]. In this regard, coarse grains and sugarcane are going to remain the major precursors in bioethanol production and in 2020 they are expected to account for 78% of bioethanol feedstock (Figure 3) although this value was 81% on average during the 2008-2010 period [20]. The large scale production of cellulosic ethanol is still not achieved and under research and development. Therefore, it is expected to expand in the latter projected years reaching up to more than 4 billion liter in 2020. This is far less than the respective value for the first generation ethanol. The rest feedstocks include wheat (3.9%), molasse (3.2%), non-agricultural feedstock (2.6%), sugar beet (2%) and other (5.8%) [20].

Similar trend has been presented for biodiesel as illustrated in Figure 2 [21]. The growth in this industry in 2020 is projected to be almost 138% compared to 2008-2010 period on average; an increase from 17.6 to 41.9 billion liter. Vegetable oils will contribute more than 78% as the main feedstocks for biodiesel production. The application of non-food oils such as jatropha in biodiesel production still remains very less as compared with the contribution of vegetable oils such as soybean and palm oil. Feedstocks other than edible oils in biodiesel production include non-agriculture feeds (12.3%), biomass-based (6%) and jatropha oil (3.2%) (Figure 3) [22]. The huge impact of such expansion in biofuel industry on the respective coproducts is incontestable. Based on the feedstock share in the biofuel production by 2020, the major coproducts of different sectors of the biofuel industry can be listed as dried distillers' grains with solubles (DDGS) from dry mill corn ethanol, corn gluten meal and corn gluten feed from wet mill corn ethanol, bagasse from sugarcane ethanol, lignin from second generation lignocellulosic ethanol, and soy meal and crude glycerol from biodiesel. More focus on these coproducts will be dedicated in the following sections.

**Figure 3.** The global biofuel production by feedstocks contribution (%) in 2020 (redrawn from data reported in [20, 22]).

#### **2.2. Biofuel coproducts**

#### *2.2.1. Corn bioethanol*

Starch-based ethanol can be obtained from corn, wheat, barley, sorghum or any other starchy grain by fermentation. However, due to highly fermentable starch content, corn is the main feedstock for ethanol production by fermentation and accounts for 98% of all starch-based ethanol feedstocks [1]. Bioethanol from corn is produced in both dry mill and wet mill plants each of which producing specific coproducts as described below.

keep the track with its increasing supply from ethanol production can only come true if the number of consumer animals is also increasing. In other words, finding new value-added usages for distillers' grains within feed sector should also be considered in the future.

Coproducts of Biofuel Industries in Value-Added Biomaterials Uses: A Move Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy

Dry Matter (%) 88.8-91.1 90 87-90 NA 91.5 NA Protein (% DM) 24.7-32.8 60 18-22 53.5-54.1 38.3 55.7-63.8 Fat (% DM) 11.0-16.3 2.5 2-5 1.4-2.3 3.6 0.8-1.5

Ash (% DM) 4.2-12.0 1.8 6.5-7.5 7.2-8.1 8.1-8.6 9.6-10.4

DDGS: dried distillers' grains with solubles, CGM: corn gluten meal, CGF: corn gluten feed, SM: soybean meal, CM: canola

It is worth to note that the U.S. dried distillers' grains with solubles (DDGS) exports already doubled in 2009 compared to 2008 and U.S. has managed to increase its export of DDGS in 2010 by 60% compared to 2009 [48]. This may suggest that there is an excess of DDGS supply over its consumption in animal feed sector in the United States. Moreover, it should be carefully examined how the revenue from distillers' grains sale as feed, returning to the biofuel industry will economically help the ethanol industry. For corn biofuel industry to stay viable, the applications of its coproduct, distillers' grains, need to be expanded [23]. Consequently, the new outlets of distillers' grains may add value to it and create revenue for the corn ethanol biofuel. Such new usages can be value-added animal [23, 49] and human food [50], burning [51-52], extraction of zein [53], cellulose [54] and oil [55-56] from distillers' grains, and biobased

Wet milling is a corn processing process in which the produced corn starch can be fermented into ethanol. Thus, ethanol is not the only product of a wet mill. In the beginning, the feedstock goes through a steeping step that soaks it in warm water containing small quantities of dissolved sulfur dioxide for almost 40 hours. This step facilitates the separation of the grain components. The different processes will be then applied such as grinding, screening, germ separation, oil refining, starch-gluten separation, drying, fermentation and syrup refining. Other products of a wet mill plant produced along with ethanol in these processes include starch, corn oil, high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) and glucose/dextrose. The coproducts of

filler for polymer composites, which is going to be discussed more later on.

**CGF [28]**

**SM [29]**

12.4-15.2 5 13 7.2-10.2 17.5 5.6-7.0

46.1-51.6 NA 35 9.6-13.8 21.5 8.1-9.1

**CM [29-30]**

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55382

**JM [31]** 497

**CGM [28]**

**DDGS [25-27]**

Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF) (% DM)

Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF) (% DM)

*2.2.1.2. Wet mill*

meal, JM: jatropha meal, NA: not available

**Table 1.** Composition of different biofuel coproducts

#### *2.2.1.1. Dry mill*

In a dry mill, ethanol is produced from corn after several steps including grinding, slurrying, cooking, liquefaction, saccharification, fermentation and distillation. Further steps are implemented to separate coproducts such as centrifugation, evaporation and drying. From the original corn mass before processing, approximately one third results in carbon dioxide during fermentation, one third is converted into ethanol and the residue are nonfermentable compo‐ nents in the form of different coproducts namely dried distillers' grains with solubles (DDGS), dried distillers' grains (DDG), wet distillers' grains (WDG) and condensed distillers' solubles (CDS). The coproducts are mainly dried and sold as dried distillers' grains with solubles (DDGS). This way, it is possible to store the coproduct for a longer time or ship it to far distances with less probability of fungi attack. A smaller part of the coproducts are shipped wet locally for immediate usage [23-24]. Distillers' grains have been traditionally using as animal feed due to its nutritious value as shown in Table 1 [25-31]. At the end of ethanol production process, when most of the grain's starch portion is fermented, there is an increase of 3 to 4 times in other components of the grain including protein, lipid and fibre over that contained in the uncon‐ verted whole grains [27].

Several attempts and studies have been published on distillers' grains application as animal feed in many different species such as dairy cattle [32], beef cattle [33], swine [34], broiler [35], laying hen [36], turkey [37], lamb [38], catfish [39], tilapia [40], trout [41] and prawn [42]. However, four major livestock species to which distillers' grains is practically fed are beef cattle, dairy cattle, swine and poultry [43-45]. Renewable Fuel Association (RFA) reports the distillers' grains consumption in 2009 in different species at approximately 39% for dairy cattle, 38% for beef cattle, 15% for swine, 7% for poultry and 1% for other species [24]. The important question here is whether the increasing supply of distillers' grains can be totally consumed by animals or the supply far exceeds its demand as feed. According to Hoffman and Baker [44] and Tokgoz et al. [46] the potential domestic and export use of distillers' grains in U.S. exceeds its production and the U.S. beef sector is the dominant user of distillers' grains. However, such opinions need precise consideration with respect to the fact that incorporation of distillers' grains within animal diets exhibits some limitations. Since distillers' grains are highly con‐ centrated in terms of nutritious content, it should be included as a part of animal feed. In this regard, Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) has set out the policy for the maximum inclusion rates of distillers' grains in the feed of different species [47]. For example, the inclusion rates of distillers' grains in the diet of beef cattle and swine must not exceed 50% on a dry basis. This suggests that continuing the use of distillers' grains in animal diet in order to


keep the track with its increasing supply from ethanol production can only come true if the number of consumer animals is also increasing. In other words, finding new value-added usages for distillers' grains within feed sector should also be considered in the future.

DDGS: dried distillers' grains with solubles, CGM: corn gluten meal, CGF: corn gluten feed, SM: soybean meal, CM: canola meal, JM: jatropha meal, NA: not available

#### **Table 1.** Composition of different biofuel coproducts

It is worth to note that the U.S. dried distillers' grains with solubles (DDGS) exports already doubled in 2009 compared to 2008 and U.S. has managed to increase its export of DDGS in 2010 by 60% compared to 2009 [48]. This may suggest that there is an excess of DDGS supply over its consumption in animal feed sector in the United States. Moreover, it should be carefully examined how the revenue from distillers' grains sale as feed, returning to the biofuel industry will economically help the ethanol industry. For corn biofuel industry to stay viable, the applications of its coproduct, distillers' grains, need to be expanded [23]. Consequently, the new outlets of distillers' grains may add value to it and create revenue for the corn ethanol biofuel. Such new usages can be value-added animal [23, 49] and human food [50], burning [51-52], extraction of zein [53], cellulose [54] and oil [55-56] from distillers' grains, and biobased filler for polymer composites, which is going to be discussed more later on.

#### *2.2.1.2. Wet mill*

Wet milling is a corn processing process in which the produced corn starch can be fermented into ethanol. Thus, ethanol is not the only product of a wet mill. In the beginning, the feedstock goes through a steeping step that soaks it in warm water containing small quantities of dissolved sulfur dioxide for almost 40 hours. This step facilitates the separation of the grain components. The different processes will be then applied such as grinding, screening, germ separation, oil refining, starch-gluten separation, drying, fermentation and syrup refining. Other products of a wet mill plant produced along with ethanol in these processes include starch, corn oil, high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) and glucose/dextrose. The coproducts of different steps are corn gluten feed, corn gluten meal, corn germ meal and corn steep liquor [28]. Corn gluten feed and corn gluten meal are the major feeds for livestock produced in a wet mill. As compared to the produced ethanol in a wet mill, corn gluten feed and corn gluten meal are produced almost as much as 70% and 17% of the mass of the produced ethanol, respectively [44]. The composition of the wet mill coproducts are presented in Table 1. Similar to distillers' grains, these coproducts account for a good source of nutritious components such as protein and fiber for feed applications. The value of these coproducts for animal feed has been realized for many years now and they are used as the feed for a wide range of animals including beef cattle [57], calf and lamb [58], dairy cattle [59], poultry [60], swine [61], pet [62] and fish [63]. Also, it has been reported that corn gluten meal can be used as the pre-emergence weed control (to control weeds before the weed seeds germinate) [64] and has been regulated by US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [65]. **2.2.1.2. Wet mill** Wet milling is a corn processing process in which the produced corn starch can be fermented into ethanol. Thus, ethanol is not the only product of a wet mill. In the beginning, the feedstock goes through a steeping step that soaks it in warm water containing small quantities of dissolved sulfur dioxide for almost 40 hours. This step facilitates the separation of the grain components. The different processes will be then applied such as grinding, screening, germ separation, oil refining, starch-gluten separation, drying, fermentation and syrup refining. Other products of a wet mill plant produced along with ethanol in these processes include starch, corn oil, high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) and glucose/dextrose. The coproducts of different steps are corn gluten feed, corn gluten meal, corn germ meal and corn steep liquor [28]. Corn gluten feed and corn gluten meal are the major feeds for livestock produced in a wet mill. As compared to the produced ethanol in a wet mill, corn gluten feed and corn gluten meal are produced almost as much as 70% and 17% of the mass of the produced ethanol, respectively [44]. The composition of the wet mill coproducts are presented in Table 1. Similar to distillers' grains, these coproducts account for a good source of nutritious components such as protein and fiber for feed applications. The value of these coproducts for animal feed has been realized for many years now and

56] from distillers, grains, and biobased filler for polymer composites, which is going to be discussed more later on.

they are used as the feed for a wide range of animals including beef cattle [57], calf and lamb [58], dairy cattle [59], poultry [60],

cellulose, 25% hemicellulose and 25% lignin [67]. Bagasse has been widely used as the fuel for generating electricity. One metric ton of bagasse containing 50% moisture will produce heat equivalent to that from 0.333 tons of fuel oil [68]. This coproduct has been considered for such purpose in different countries such as Zimbabwe [69], Nicaragua [70] and Brazil [71]. Another large utilization of bagasse is in paper and pulp industry. This was patented in 1981 [72] and found huge application in many places such as India as early as 1990 [73]. The particleboard production is another industrial utilization of this biomass [74]. Bagasse has been also used in composting to a limited extent [68] and use of fungal strains on bagasse has been reported to produce compost with low pH and high soluble phosphorus [75]. Fermentation of bagasse

Coproducts of Biofuel Industries in Value-Added Biomaterials Uses: A Move Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy

As a lignocellulosic material, bagasse has the potential of a feedstock for biofuel production either by gasification or hydrolysis method. In this context, still the biofuel production from bagasse via gasification has not been reported. However, as an alternative method competitive to the direct combustion of bagasse, gasification using a two-stage reactor has been proposed to be economically viable and more efficient [77]. Also, studies have been conducted in order to improve the bagasse gasification as far as retention and separation of alkali compound is concerned during the process. Considering the lignocellulosic ethanol production from bagasse, several investigations has been published on liquid hot water, steam pretreatment [78] and acid hydrolysis of it [79] as well as simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation (SSCF) method [80]. As published in 2004, about 180 MT of dry sugarcane bagasse is produced

The expansion in production of the sugar-based ethanol is one of the key factors affecting the bagasse production. The sugarcane harvest of Brazil, the global leader of sugar-based ethanol, has shifted upward approximately 45% during recent five years from 425.4 MT in 2006-07 to 620.4 MT in 2010-11 (Figure 5) [82]. The ethanol production in Brazil generally shows a similar trend. To produce one liter of ethanol, 12.5 Kg of sugarcane is required. The weight of the produced bagasse is about 30% of the weight of sugarcane used for sugar or ethanol production [66]. Therefore, the bagasse production of Brazil in 2010-11 can be estimated as more than 180

As a lignocellulosic material, bagasse has the potential of a feedstock for biofuel production either by gasification or hydrolysis method. In this context, still the biofuel production from bagasse via gasification has not been reported. However, as an alternative method competitive to the direct combustion of bagasse, gasification using a two-stage reactor has been proposed to be economically viable and more efficient [77]. Also, studies have been conducted in order to improve the bagasse gasification as far as retention and separation of alkali compound is concerned during the process. Considering the lignocellulosic ethanol production from bagasse, several investigations has been published on liquid hot water, steam pretreatment [78] and acid hydrolysis of it [79] as well as simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation (SSCF) method [80]. As published in 2004, about 180 MT of dry

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55382

499

The expansion in the sugar-based ethanol is one of the key factors affecting the bagasse production. The sugarcane harvest of Brazil, the global leader of sugar-based ethanol, has shifted upward approximately 45% during recent five years from 425.4 MT in 2006-07 to 620.4 MT in 2010-11 (Figure 5) [82]. The ethanol production in Brazil generally shows a similar trend. To produce one liter of ethanol, 12.5 Kg of sugarcane is required. The weight of the bagasse produced is about 30% of the weight of sugarcane used [66]. Therefore, the bagasse production of Brazil in 2010-11 can be estimated as more than 180 MT, almost equal to global bagasse

In a second generation bioethanol plant, lignocellulosic polysaccharides (cellulose and hemicellulose) are broken down into monosaccharides (hexose and pentose) to be further fermented into ethanol. This includes a sequence of processes such as pretreatment, hydrolysis (enzymatically or chemically), fermentation and purification. At the end, the residual from the original lignocellulosic biomass is the coproduct mainly in the form of lignin [83]. The amount and quality of the produced lignin depends on the original lignocellulosic matter and the process. Typically, lignocelluloses contain 10–30 % lignin, which depends on various factors such as nature of biomasses, growth as well as isolation process [84]. As we know, lignin is a polymer that exists in the cell walls of plants, which is available in nature next to cellulose. The role of lignin in plant is to save them from compression, impact, bending. In addition to that, the major role of lignin extends to prevent the plant tissues from various kinds of naturally occurring

Chemically the polymeric structure of lignin is highly complicated and consists of three different monomer units (Figure 6) and they are called as p-coumaryl alcohol, coniferyl alcohol and sinapyl alcohol [86-87]. As we discussed, in addition to plant varieties, the lignin extraction process (known to be delignification) play a major role in the determination of local structure. Thus, the chemical structure of lignin extracted from plant biomass is never similar as exist in plant. There is a possibility for the alteration of monomer arrangement in the lignin structure. Hence, the lignin in plants called as "natural lignin", are termed as "technical lignin" after isolation. These technical lignins can further classified into three classes based on the domination of monomer units and they are [88]: (i) Softwood lignin: dominated with coniferyl monomer units, (ii) Hard wood lignin: combinations of equal quantities of guaiacyl and syringyl monomer units and (iii) Grass lignin: equally formulated with all three monomers of coniferyl, sinapyl and

The sources for lignin production can be divided into two major categories and they are (i) paper and (ii) bioethanol industries. They use different types of de-lignification process thus the lignin from paper industries and the lignin from bioethanol industries are not similar. Paper industries adopt Kraft, Sulphite, and Soda pulping processes to remove lignin from biomass, where as lignocellulosic ethanol industries, prefer to go with organosolv, steam explosion, dilute acid as well as ammonia fibre explosion for the removal of lignin [89]. Due to the tough food-versus-fuel concerns, non-food crops such as switchgrass, miscanthus and sugarcane bagasse become an effective feedstock for ethanol production and those related biofuel are named as second generation biofuels [90]. As the global demand for biofuel continues to grow, there will be an emerging opportunities for lignocellulosic ethanol industries, which is expected to create a huge amount of lignin and it is predicted to be ~225 million tons by 2030 [85]. The

sugarcane bagasse is produced globally and can be utilized to produce about 51 GL of bioethanol [81].

Figure 5. Brazilian sugarcane harvest and ethanol production (drawn from data reported in [82]).

Ethanol production (BL)

using mold cultures was also considered to produce animal feed [76].

globally and can be utilized to produce about 51 GL of bioethanol [81].

MT, almost equal to global bagasse production before 2004.

Sugarcane harvest (MT)

production before 2004.

**2.2.3. Lignocellulosic bioethanol** 

**Figure 5.** Brazilian sugarcane harvest and ethanol production (drawn from data reported in [82]).

0123456

06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11

Sugarcane harvest Ethanol production

microorganisms [85].

p-coumaryl.

This coproduct has been considered for such purpose in different countries such as Zimbabwe [69], Nicaragua [70] and Brazil [71]. Another large utilization of bagasse is in paper and pulp industry. This was patented in 1981 [72] and found huge application in many places such as India as early as 1990 [73]. The particleboard production is another industrial utilization of this biomass [74]. Bagasse has been also used in composting to a limited extent [68] and use of fungal strains on bagasse has been reported to produce compost with low pH and high soluble phosphorus [75]. Fermentation of bagasse using mold cultures was also considered to

#### *2.2.1.3. Corn ethanol coproducts production* swine [61], pet [62] and fish [63]. Also, it has been reported that corn gluten meal can be used as the pre-emergence weed control (to control weeds before the weed seeds germinate) [64] and has been regulated by US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Although there is a lack of comprehensive statistics on global production of corn bioethanol coproducts, a general insight can be obtained considering the production of these coproducts in the United States during last 10 years. This may be reasonable since U.S. is the largest ethanol producer globally with more than 50% contribution in 2007 and 2008 [8]. As reported by the Renewable Fuels Association (RFA) (Figure 4), the production of distillers' grains, corn gluten feed and corn gluten meal in the U.S. have shifted totally more than 10 times from 3.1 million tonnes in 2001 to 32.5 million tonnes in 2010 [24]. [65]. **2.2.1.3. Corn ethanol coproducts production** Although there is a lack of comprehensive statistics on global production of corn bioethanol coproducts, a general insight can be obtained considering the production of these coproducts in the United States during last 10 years. This may be reasonable since U.S. is the largest ethanol producer globally with more than 50% contribution in 2007 and 2008 [8]. As reported by the Renewable Fuels Association (RFA) (Figure 4), the production of distillers' grains, corn gluten feed and corn gluten meal in the U.S. have

shifted totally more than 10 times from 3.1 million tonnes in 2001 to 32.5 million tonnes in 2010 [24].

Figure 4. Production of ethanol biorefineries coproducts in US including distillers grains, corn gluten feed and corn gluten meal (drawn from data reported in [24]). **Figure 4.** Production of ethanol biorefineries coproducts in US including distillers grains, corn gluten feed and corn gluten meal (drawn from data reported in [24]).

#### **2.2.2. Sugar cane bioethanol**  *2.2.2. Sugarcane bioethanol*

In a sugar mill, the crushed sugarcane is washed to go for juice extraction. The resulted juice can be used for sugar as well as ethanol production. Bagasse is the lignocellulosic coproduct after the sugarcane is crushed for juice extraction [66]. Approximately, it consists of 50% cellulose, 25% hemicellulose and 25% lignin [67].. Bagasse has been widely used as the fuel for generating electricity. One metric ton of bagasse containing 50% moisture will produce heat equivalent to that from 0.333 tons of fuel oil [68]. In a sugar mill, the crushed sugarcane is washed to go for juice extraction. The resulted juice can be used for sugar as well as ethanol production. Bagasse is the lignocellulosic coproduct after the sugarcane is crushed for juice extraction [66]. Approximately, it consists of 50%

produce animal feed [76].

cellulose, 25% hemicellulose and 25% lignin [67]. Bagasse has been widely used as the fuel for generating electricity. One metric ton of bagasse containing 50% moisture will produce heat equivalent to that from 0.333 tons of fuel oil [68]. This coproduct has been considered for such purpose in different countries such as Zimbabwe [69], Nicaragua [70] and Brazil [71]. Another large utilization of bagasse is in paper and pulp industry. This was patented in 1981 [72] and found huge application in many places such as India as early as 1990 [73]. The particleboard production is another industrial utilization of this biomass [74]. Bagasse has been also used in composting to a limited extent [68] and use of fungal strains on bagasse has been reported to produce compost with low pH and high soluble phosphorus [75]. Fermentation of bagasse using mold cultures was also considered to produce animal feed [76].

As a lignocellulosic material, bagasse has the potential of a feedstock for biofuel production either by gasification or hydrolysis method. In this context, still the biofuel production from bagasse via gasification has not been reported. However, as an alternative method competitive to the direct combustion of bagasse, gasification using a two-stage reactor has been proposed to be economically viable and more efficient [77]. Also, studies have been conducted in order to improve the bagasse gasification as far as retention and separation of alkali compound is concerned during the process. Considering the lignocellulosic ethanol production from bagasse, several investigations has been published on liquid hot water, steam pretreatment [78] and acid hydrolysis of it [79] as well as simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation (SSCF) method [80]. As published in 2004, about 180 MT of dry sugarcane bagasse is produced globally and can be utilized to produce about 51 GL of bioethanol [81]. As a lignocellulosic material, bagasse has the potential of a feedstock for biofuel production either by gasification or hydrolysis method. In this context, still the biofuel production from bagasse via gasification has not been reported. However, as an alternative method competitive to the direct combustion of bagasse, gasification using a two-stage reactor has been proposed to be

The expansion in production of the sugar-based ethanol is one of the key factors affecting the bagasse production. The sugarcane harvest of Brazil, the global leader of sugar-based ethanol, has shifted upward approximately 45% during recent five years from 425.4 MT in 2006-07 to 620.4 MT in 2010-11 (Figure 5) [82]. The ethanol production in Brazil generally shows a similar trend. To produce one liter of ethanol, 12.5 Kg of sugarcane is required. The weight of the produced bagasse is about 30% of the weight of sugarcane used for sugar or ethanol production [66]. Therefore, the bagasse production of Brazil in 2010-11 can be estimated as more than 180 MT, almost equal to global bagasse production before 2004. economically viable and more efficient [77]. Also, studies have been conducted in order to improve the bagasse gasification as far as retention and separation of alkali compound is concerned during the process. Considering the lignocellulosic ethanol production from bagasse, several investigations has been published on liquid hot water, steam pretreatment [78] and acid hydrolysis of it [79] as well as simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation (SSCF) method [80]. As published in 2004, about 180 MT of dry sugarcane bagasse is produced globally and can be utilized to produce about 51 GL of bioethanol [81]. The expansion in the sugar-based ethanol is one of the key factors affecting the bagasse production. The sugarcane harvest of Brazil, the global leader of sugar-based ethanol, has shifted upward approximately 45% during recent five years from 425.4 MT in 2006-07 to 620.4 MT in 2010-11 (Figure 5) [82]. The ethanol production in Brazil generally shows a similar trend. To produce one liter of ethanol, 12.5 Kg of sugarcane is required. The weight of the bagasse produced is about 30% of the weight of sugarcane used [66]. Therefore, the bagasse production of Brazil in 2010-11 can be estimated as more than 180 MT, almost equal to global bagasse

Figure 5. Brazilian sugarcane harvest and ethanol production (drawn from data reported in [82]). **Figure 5.** Brazilian sugarcane harvest and ethanol production (drawn from data reported in [82]).

microorganisms [85].

p-coumaryl.

**2.2.3. Lignocellulosic bioethanol** 

In a second generation bioethanol plant, lignocellulosic polysaccharides (cellulose and hemicellulose) are broken down into monosaccharides (hexose and pentose) to be further fermented into ethanol. This includes a sequence of processes such as pretreatment, hydrolysis (enzymatically or chemically), fermentation and purification. At the end, the residual from the original lignocellulosic biomass is the coproduct mainly in the form of lignin [83]. The amount and quality of the produced lignin depends on the original lignocellulosic matter and the process. Typically, lignocelluloses contain 10–30 % lignin, which depends on various factors such as nature of biomasses, growth as well as isolation process [84]. As we know, lignin is a polymer that exists in the cell walls of plants, which is available in nature next to cellulose. The role of lignin in plant is to save them from compression, impact, bending. In addition to that, the major role of lignin extends to prevent the plant tissues from various kinds of naturally occurring

Chemically the polymeric structure of lignin is highly complicated and consists of three different monomer units (Figure 6) and they are called as p-coumaryl alcohol, coniferyl alcohol and sinapyl alcohol [86-87]. As we discussed, in addition to plant varieties, the lignin extraction process (known to be delignification) play a major role in the determination of local structure. Thus, the chemical structure of lignin extracted from plant biomass is never similar as exist in plant. There is a possibility for the alteration of monomer arrangement in the lignin structure. Hence, the lignin in plants called as "natural lignin", are termed as "technical lignin" after isolation. These technical lignins can further classified into three classes based on the domination of monomer units and they are [88]: (i) Softwood lignin: dominated with coniferyl monomer units, (ii) Hard wood lignin: combinations of equal quantities of guaiacyl and syringyl monomer units and (iii) Grass lignin: equally formulated with all three monomers of coniferyl, sinapyl and

The sources for lignin production can be divided into two major categories and they are (i) paper and (ii) bioethanol industries. They use different types of de-lignification process thus the lignin from paper industries and the lignin from bioethanol industries are not similar. Paper industries adopt Kraft, Sulphite, and Soda pulping processes to remove lignin from biomass, where as lignocellulosic ethanol industries, prefer to go with organosolv, steam explosion, dilute acid as well as ammonia fibre explosion for the removal of lignin [89]. Due to the tough food-versus-fuel concerns, non-food crops such as switchgrass, miscanthus and sugarcane bagasse become an effective feedstock for ethanol production and those related biofuel are named as second generation biofuels [90]. As the global demand for biofuel continues to grow, there will be an emerging opportunities for lignocellulosic ethanol industries, which is expected to create a huge amount of lignin and it is predicted to be ~225 million tons by 2030 [85]. The

production before 2004.

#### *2.2.3. Lignocellulosic bioethanol*

In a second generation bioethanol plant, lignocellulosic polysaccharides (cellulose and hemicellulose) are broken down into monosaccharides (hexose and pentose) to be further fermented into ethanol. This includes a sequence of processes such as pretreatment, hydrolysis (enzymatically or chemically), fermentation and purification. At the end, the residual from the original lignocellulosic biomass is the coproduct mainly in the form of lignin [83]. The amount and quality of the produced lignin depends on the original lignocellulosic matter and the process. Typically, lignocelluloses contain 10–30 % lignin, which depends on various factors such as nature of biomasses, growth as well as isolation process [84]. As we know, lignin is a polymer that exists in the cell walls of plants, which is available in nature next to cellulose. The role of lignin in plant is to save them from compression, impact and bending. In addition to that, the major role of lignin extends to prevent the plant tissues from various kinds of naturally occurring microorganisms [85].

Only 2% of the lignin, which is produced from various sources, has been used as the feedstock for various chemicals including phenol, terephthalic acid, benzene, xylene, toluene, etc. [89] In addition to these, lignin has also been used in fertilizer, wood adhesives, surfactants, and also some kind of coloring agents [89]. Recently, lignin has been included as filler/reinforcing agent for blends and composites in both thermoplastic as well as thermoset platforms [85, 92-94]. In addition to that, lignin is found to be a suitable renewable carbon source for the synthesis of carbon materials [95]. Lignin has been widely exploited for the fabrication of activated carbon for various purposes including hydrogen storage, waste water removal and energy storage/conversion. Especially synthesizing nanostructured carbon materials from renewable resource-based lignin receives a great scientific interest due to the unique mor‐ phology as well as their physicochemical properties. As the global demand grows for the carbon fibre composites, there is a huge demand for the low cost carbon fibres. Lignin-based carbon fibres can substitute polyacrylonitrile (PAN)-based carbon fibre, hence the opportunity for lignin as a successful feedstock for carbon fibre is in near future [96]. This will be possible by understanding the basics of lignin chemistry and their application for fibre fabrication.

Coproducts of Biofuel Industries in Value-Added Biomaterials Uses: A Move Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55382

501

The major biodiesel feedstocks are vegetable oils which are generally produced by crushing oil seeds, leaving significant quantity of proteineous meals as coproducts. The global con‐ sumption of proteineous meal in 2011/12 as reported by USDA Economic Research Services [97] is depicted in Figure 7 indicating soybean as the predominant crop producing proteineous meal with 67 % contribution. According to the FAOSTAT database [98], US, Brazil and Argentina were the global premiers of soybean production in 2010 with 35, 26 and 20% contribution, respectively. The next largest producer is China with almost 6% share in the global soybean production. In this context, biodiesel production of the US, as for example, has increased, during 2006-11 period, 340% from 250 to 1100 millions of gallons [99], which promoted the proteineous meal production. Soybean meal is traditionally used as a filler in animal feed including poultry, swine, beef, dairy, pet and other animals due to its concentrated

Other examples of plant-based feedstock potentially suitable for oil extraction and biodiesel production can be listed as canola and linseed [100], palm [101], karanja [102] and jatropha [103]. Jatropha is a non-edible seed from a large shrub commonly found throughout most of the tropical and subtropical regions of the world. As shown previously in section 2.1, jatropha is projected to have a 3.2 % contribution in biodiesel production by 2020. The growing utilization of plant-based feedstocks other than soybean meal in biodiesel production also

Biodiesel is chemically known as methyl esters, which is produced through transestrification reaction by reacting a vegetable oil or animal fat with an alcohol under a strong base catalysis environment [104]. Along with biodiesel, such transestrification reaction produces significant

*2.2.4. Biodiesel*

*2.2.4.1. Proteineous meal*

protein content (Table 1).

*2.2.4.2. Crude glycerol*

brings new streams of proteineous meal as coproducts.

Chemically the polymeric structure of lignin is highly complicated and consists of three different monomer units (Figure 6) and they are called as p-coumaryl alcohol, coniferyl alcohol and sinapyl alcohol [86-87]. In addition to plant varieties, the lignin extraction process (known to be delignification) play a major role in the determination of local structure. Thus, the chemical structure of lignin extracted from plant biomass is never similar as exist in plant. There is a possibility for the alteration of monomer arrangement in the lignin structure. Hence, the lignin in plants, called as "natural lignin", is termed as "technical lignin" after isolation. These technical lignins can be further classified into three classes based on the domination of monomer units and they are [88]: (i) Softwood lignin: dominated with coniferyl monomer units, (ii) Hard wood lignin: combinations of equal quantities of guaiacyl and syringyl monomer units and (iii) Grass lignin: equally formulated with all three monomers of coniferyl, sinapyl and p-coumaryl.

The sources for lignin production can be divided into two major categories and they are (i) paper and (ii) bioethanol industries. They use different types of de-lignification process thus the lignin from paper industries and the lignin from bioethanol industries are not similar. Paper industries adopt Kraft, Sulphite, and Soda pulping processes to remove lignin from biomass, where as lignocellulosic ethanol industries, prefer to go with organosolv, steam explosion, dilute acid as well as ammonia fibre explosion for the removal of lignin [89]. Due to the tough food-versus-fuel concerns, non-food crops such as switchgrass, miscanthus and sugarcane bagasse become an effective feedstock for ethanol production and those related biofuel are named as second generation biofuels [90]. As the global demand for biofuel continues to grow, there will be emerging opportunities for lignocellulosic ethanol industries, which is expected to create a huge amount of lignin and it is predicted to be ~225 million tons by 2030 [85]. The challenge is to dispose them effectively that includes using them as a feedstock for energy products as well as for the fabrication of various chemicals and materials [91]. In common practice, lignin has been used for energy fuel, which is also the easiest way of disposal. In other hand, value-added uses of lignin can give economic return to the lignocellulosic ethanol industries and can improve their sustainability.

Only 2% of the lignin, which is produced from various sources, has been used as the feedstock for various chemicals including phenol, terephthalic acid, benzene, xylene, toluene, etc. [89] In addition to these, lignin has also been used in fertilizer, wood adhesives, surfactants, and also some kind of coloring agents [89]. Recently, lignin has been included as filler/reinforcing agent for blends and composites in both thermoplastic as well as thermoset platforms [85, 92-94]. In addition to that, lignin is found to be a suitable renewable carbon source for the synthesis of carbon materials [95]. Lignin has been widely exploited for the fabrication of activated carbon for various purposes including hydrogen storage, waste water removal and energy storage/conversion. Especially synthesizing nanostructured carbon materials from renewable resource-based lignin receives a great scientific interest due to the unique mor‐ phology as well as their physicochemical properties. As the global demand grows for the carbon fibre composites, there is a huge demand for the low cost carbon fibres. Lignin-based carbon fibres can substitute polyacrylonitrile (PAN)-based carbon fibre, hence the opportunity for lignin as a successful feedstock for carbon fibre is in near future [96]. This will be possible by understanding the basics of lignin chemistry and their application for fibre fabrication.

#### *2.2.4. Biodiesel*

#### *2.2.4.1. Proteineous meal*

The major biodiesel feedstocks are vegetable oils which are generally produced by crushing oil seeds, leaving significant quantity of proteineous meals as coproducts. The global con‐ sumption of proteineous meal in 2011/12 as reported by USDA Economic Research Services [97] is depicted in Figure 7 indicating soybean as the predominant crop producing proteineous meal with 67 % contribution. According to the FAOSTAT database [98], US, Brazil and Argentina were the global premiers of soybean production in 2010 with 35, 26 and 20% contribution, respectively. The next largest producer is China with almost 6% share in the global soybean production. In this context, biodiesel production of the US, as for example, has increased, during 2006-11 period, 340% from 250 to 1100 millions of gallons [99], which promoted the proteineous meal production. Soybean meal is traditionally used as a filler in animal feed including poultry, swine, beef, dairy, pet and other animals due to its concentrated protein content (Table 1).

Other examples of plant-based feedstock potentially suitable for oil extraction and biodiesel production can be listed as canola and linseed [100], palm [101], karanja [102] and jatropha [103]. Jatropha is a non-edible seed from a large shrub commonly found throughout most of the tropical and subtropical regions of the world. As shown previously in section 2.1, jatropha is projected to have a 3.2 % contribution in biodiesel production by 2020. The growing utilization of plant-based feedstocks other than soybean meal in biodiesel production also brings new streams of proteineous meal as coproducts.

#### *2.2.4.2. Crude glycerol*

Biodiesel is chemically known as methyl esters, which is produced through transestrification reaction by reacting a vegetable oil or animal fat with an alcohol under a strong base catalysis environment [104]. Along with biodiesel, such transestrification reaction produces significant

medium ranged industries. Hence, it is necessary to investigate the value-added uses of crude

0 50 100 150 200

Coproducts of Biofuel Industries in Value-Added Biomaterials Uses: A Move Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy

Figure 7. World protein meal consumption (million tonnes) in 2011 (drawn from data reported in [97]).

meal in biodiesel production also brings new streams of proteineous meal as coproducts.

**2.2.4.1. Proteineous meal** 

(Table 1).

Soybean Rapeseed Cottonseed Sunflowerseed Peanut Palm Kernel Fish Copra

Priortothat,itisnecessarytounderstandtherelationshipbetweentheoilfeedstockandthecrude glycerol. Thompson and He [105] performed a research on the characterization of crude glycerol samples from various feedstocks. Their research shows that the compositions of different crude glycerol are highly varying with their feedstocks. This creates the challenge to adopt a univer‐ sal protocol to fabricate value-added products from crude glycerol from various feedstocks. Crude glycerol has been used to produce various products including 1,3/1,2-propanediol, dihydroxyacetones, polyesters and hydrogen [107]. Mu et al. [108] reported the synthesis of 1,3 propanediol using crude glycerol produced during biodiesel preparation through fermenta‐ tionprocessusingKlebsiellapneumonia.Theyusedthecrudeglycerolobtainedduringsoybean oil-basedbiodieselproductionemployingalkalicatalysis.Theyultimatelycomparedtheproduct of1,3-propanediolobtainedfrompureglycerolandfoundthattheyaresimilartoeachother[108]. Soares et al. [109] demonstrated the generation of synthesis gas or syngas (hydrogen and carbon

**2.2.4.2. Crude glycerol** 

**Figure 7.** World protein meal consumption (million tonnes) in 2011 (drawn from data reported in [97]).

catalyst. Further it can be converted into fuels/chemicals by Fischer–Tropsch methanol synthe‐ sis. They also suggest this process for the effective utilization of various crude glycerol feed‐ stocks for the fabrication of high value fuels/chemicals. Mothes et al. [110] reported the synthesis ofpoly(3-hydroxybutyrate),PHB,usingcrudeglycerol(rapeseedoil-based)as thefeedstockvia biotechnological process employing Paracoccus denitrificans and Cupriavidus necator mi‐ crobes.TheycomparedthepropertiesofthesynthesizedPHBsfromtwodifferentfeedstocksand foundthatthepropertiesareverysimilar.Zhouetal.[111]reviewedthechemo-selectiveoxidation of crude glycerol into various products such as glyceric acid, hydroxypyruvic acid and mesoox‐ alicacidwhichcanbeusedasprecursorforvariousfinechemicalsandpolymericmaterials.These reports indicate the emerging opportunities for crude glycerol for various applications includ‐

Due to the uncertainty in long term availability of fossil fuels and their continuous threat to environment through greenhouse gas emission, there is a drive across the globe towards the

C employing a Pd-based

Prior to that, it is necessary to understand the relationship between the oil feedstock and the crude glycerol. Thompson and He [105] performed a research on the characterization of crude glycerol samples from various feedstocks. His research shows that the compositions of different crude glycerol are highly varying with their feedstocks. This creates the challenge to adopt a universal protocol to fabricate value-added products from crude glycerol from various feedstocks. Crude glycerol has been used to produce various products including 1,3/1,2-propanediol, dihydroxyacetones, polyesters and hydrogen [107]. Mu et al. [108] reported the synthesis of 1,3-propanediol using crude glycerol produced during biodiesel preparation through fermentation process using Klebsiella pneumonia. They used the crude glycerol obtained during soybean oil-based biodiesel production employing alkali catalysis. They ultimately compared the product of 1,3-propanediol obtained from pure glycerol and found that they are similar to each other [108]. Soares et al. [109] demonstrated the generation of synthesis gas or syngas (hydrogen and carbon monoxide) from glycerol at very low temperature between 225-300 oC employing a Pd based catalyst. Further it can be converted in to fuels/chemicals by Fischer–Tropsch methanol synthesis. They also suggest this process for the effective utilization of various crude glycerol feedstocks for the fabrication of high value fuels/chemicals. Mothes et al. [110] reported the synthesis of poly (3 hydroxybutyrate), PHB, using crude glycerol (rape seed oil based) as the feedstock via biotechnological process employing Paracoccus denitrificans and Cupriavidus necator microbes. They compared the properties of the synthesized PHBs from two different feedstocks and found that the properties are very similar. Zhou et al. [111] reviewed the chemo-selective oxidation of

ranged industries. Hence, it is necessary to investigate the value-added uses of crude glycerol in various applications.

The major biodiesel feedstocks are vegetable oils which are generally produced by crushing oil seeds, leaving significant quantity of proteineous meals as coproducts. The global consumption of proteineous meal in 2011/12 as reported by USDA Economic Research Services [97] is depicted in Figure 7 indicating soybean as the predominant crop producing proteineous meal with 67 % contribution. According to the FAOSTAT database [98], US, Brazil and Argentina were the global premiers of soybean production in 2010 with 35, 26 and 20% contribution, respectively. The next largest producer is China with almost 6% share in the global soybean production. In this context, biodiesel production of the US, as for example, has increased, during 2006-11 period, almost 3.5 times from 250 to 1100 millions of gallons [99], which promoted the proteineous meal production. Soybean meal is traditionally used as a filler in animal feed including poultry, swine, beef, dairy, pet and other animals due to its concentrated protein content

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55382

503

Other examples of plant-based feedstock potentially suitable for oil extraction and biodiesel production can be listed as canola and linseed [100], palm [101], karanja [102] and jatropha [103]. Jatropha is a non-edible seed from a large shrub commonly found throughout most of the tropical and subtropical regions of the world. As shown previously in section 2.1, jatropha is projected to have a 3.2 % contribution in biodiesel production by 2020. The growing utilization of plant-based feedstocks other than soybean

Biodiesel is chemically known as methyl esters, which is produced through transestrification reaction by reacting a vegetable oil or animal fat with an alcohol under a strong base catalysis environment [104]. Along with biodiesel, such transestrification reaction produces significant quantity of glycerol (also called as glycerin), which normally collected with other ingredients such as catalysis, water and unrelated alcohol and it is termed as crude glycerol [105]. Normally biodiesel industries utilizes excess amount of methanol as required for the completion of reaction, which leaves un-reacted methanol to the glycerol after the reaction. With every 3 gallon of biodiesel, 1kg of crude glycerol is produced and it shows very low value because of its impurity [106]. As the global biodiesel production increases exponentially, the resulting crude glycerol is extensively high and become issues due to their disposal or effective utilization. In other hand, pure glycerol found a wide range of applications that includes food, cosmetics, and drugs. In order to upgrade the crude glycerol to those high end applications it should undergo various purification stages such as bleaching, deodoring, and ion exchange. Normally, this is not affordable nor economically feasible for most of the small/medium

monoxide) from glycerol at very low temperature between 225-300 o

glycerol in various applications.

ing chemical, fuel and materials.

**2.3. Sustainability through value addition**

**Figure 6.** (A) Phenolic precursors that form the lignin and (B) Chemical structure of lignin (reprinted the figure with permission) [87].

quantity of glycerol (also called as glycerin), which is normally collected with other ingredients such as catalysis, water and unreacted alcohol and it is termed as crude glycerol [105]. Normally biodiesel industries utilize excess amount of methanol as required for the completion of reaction, which leaves unreacted methanol to the glycerol after the reaction. With every 3 gallons of biodiesel, 1kg of crude glycerol is produced and it shows very low value because of its impurity [106]. As the global biodiesel production increases exponentially, the resulting crude glycerol is extensively high and become issues due to their disposal or effective utiliza‐ tion. On the other hand, pure glycerol has found a wide range of applications that includes food, cosmetics, and drugs. In order to upgrade the crude glycerol to those high end applica‐ tions, it should undergo various purification stages such as bleaching, deodoring, and ion exchange. Normally, this is not affordable nor economically feasible for most of the small/ The major biodiesel feedstocks are vegetable oils which are generally produced by crushing oil seeds, leaving significant quantity of proteineous meals as coproducts. The global consumption of proteineous meal in 2011/12 as reported by USDA Economic Research Services [97] is depicted in Figure 7 indicating soybean as the predominant crop producing proteineous meal with 67 % contribution. According to the FAOSTAT database [98], US, Brazil and Argentina were the global premiers of soybean production in 2010 with 35, 26 and 20% contribution, respectively. The next largest producer is China with almost 6% share in the global

have a 3.2 % contribution in biodiesel production by 2020. The growing utilization of plant-based feedstocks other than soybean

Figure 7. World protein meal consumption (million tonnes) in 2011 (drawn from data reported in [97]). **Figure 7.** World protein meal consumption (million tonnes) in 2011 (drawn from data reported in [97]).

**2.2.4.1. Proteineous meal** 

(Table 1).

medium ranged industries. Hence, it is necessary to investigate the value-added uses of crude glycerol in various applications. Other examples of plant-based feedstock potentially suitable for oil extraction and biodiesel production can be listed as canola and linseed [100], palm [101], karanja [102] and jatropha [103]. Jatropha is a non-edible seed from a large shrub commonly found throughout most of the tropical and subtropical regions of the world. As shown previously in section 2.1, jatropha is projected to

Priortothat,itisnecessarytounderstandtherelationshipbetweentheoilfeedstockandthecrude glycerol. Thompson and He [105] performed a research on the characterization of crude glycerol samples from various feedstocks. Their research shows that the compositions of different crude glycerol are highly varying with their feedstocks. This creates the challenge to adopt a univer‐ sal protocol to fabricate value-added products from crude glycerol from various feedstocks. Crude glycerol has been used to produce various products including 1,3/1,2-propanediol, dihydroxyacetones, polyesters and hydrogen [107]. Mu et al. [108] reported the synthesis of 1,3 propanediol using crude glycerol produced during biodiesel preparation through fermenta‐ tionprocessusingKlebsiellapneumonia.Theyusedthecrudeglycerolobtainedduringsoybean oil-basedbiodieselproductionemployingalkalicatalysis.Theyultimatelycomparedtheproduct of1,3-propanediolobtainedfrompureglycerolandfoundthattheyaresimilartoeachother[108]. Soares et al. [109] demonstrated the generation of synthesis gas or syngas (hydrogen and carbon monoxide) from glycerol at very low temperature between 225-300 o C employing a Pd-based catalyst. Further it can be converted into fuels/chemicals by Fischer–Tropsch methanol synthe‐ sis. They also suggest this process for the effective utilization of various crude glycerol feed‐ stocks for the fabrication of high value fuels/chemicals. Mothes et al. [110] reported the synthesis ofpoly(3-hydroxybutyrate),PHB,usingcrudeglycerol(rapeseedoil-based)as thefeedstockvia biotechnological process employing Paracoccus denitrificans and Cupriavidus necator mi‐ crobes.TheycomparedthepropertiesofthesynthesizedPHBsfromtwodifferentfeedstocksand foundthatthepropertiesareverysimilar.Zhouetal.[111]reviewedthechemo-selectiveoxidation of crude glycerol into various products such as glyceric acid, hydroxypyruvic acid and mesoox‐ alicacidwhichcanbeusedasprecursorforvariousfinechemicalsandpolymericmaterials.These reports indicate the emerging opportunities for crude glycerol for various applications includ‐ ing chemical, fuel and materials. meal in biodiesel production also brings new streams of proteineous meal as coproducts. **2.2.4.2. Crude glycerol**  Biodiesel is chemically known as methyl esters, which is produced through transestrification reaction by reacting a vegetable oil or animal fat with an alcohol under a strong base catalysis environment [104]. Along with biodiesel, such transestrification reaction produces significant quantity of glycerol (also called as glycerin), which normally collected with other ingredients such as catalysis, water and unrelated alcohol and it is termed as crude glycerol [105]. Normally biodiesel industries utilizes excess amount of methanol as required for the completion of reaction, which leaves un-reacted methanol to the glycerol after the reaction. With every 3 gallon of biodiesel, 1kg of crude glycerol is produced and it shows very low value because of its impurity [106]. As the global biodiesel production increases exponentially, the resulting crude glycerol is extensively high and become issues due to their disposal or effective utilization. In other hand, pure glycerol found a wide range of applications that includes food, cosmetics, and drugs. In order to upgrade the crude glycerol to those high end applications it should undergo various purification stages such as bleaching, deodoring, and ion exchange. Normally, this is not affordable nor economically feasible for most of the small/medium ranged industries. Hence, it is necessary to investigate the value-added uses of crude glycerol in various applications. Prior to that, it is necessary to understand the relationship between the oil feedstock and the crude glycerol. Thompson and He [105] performed a research on the characterization of crude glycerol samples from various feedstocks. His research shows that the compositions of different crude glycerol are highly varying with their feedstocks. This creates the challenge to adopt a universal protocol to fabricate value-added products from crude glycerol from various feedstocks. Crude glycerol has been used to produce various products including 1,3/1,2-propanediol, dihydroxyacetones, polyesters and hydrogen [107]. Mu et al. [108] reported the synthesis of 1,3-propanediol using crude glycerol produced during biodiesel preparation through fermentation process using Klebsiella pneumonia. They used the crude glycerol obtained during soybean oil-based biodiesel production employing alkali catalysis. They ultimately compared the product of 1,3-propanediol obtained from pure glycerol and found that they are similar to each other [108]. Soares et al. [109] demonstrated the generation of synthesis gas or syngas (hydrogen and carbon monoxide) from glycerol at very low temperature between 225-300 oC employing a Pd based catalyst. Further it can be converted in to fuels/chemicals by Fischer–Tropsch methanol synthesis. They also suggest this process for the effective utilization of various crude glycerol feedstocks for the fabrication of high value fuels/chemicals. Mothes et al. [110] reported the synthesis of poly (3 hydroxybutyrate), PHB, using crude glycerol (rape seed oil based) as the feedstock via biotechnological process employing Paracoccus denitrificans and Cupriavidus necator microbes. They compared the properties of the synthesized PHBs from two different feedstocks and found that the properties are very similar. Zhou et al. [111] reviewed the chemo-selective oxidation of

#### **2.3. Sustainability through value addition**

Due to the uncertainty in long term availability of fossil fuels and their continuous threat to environment through greenhouse gas emission, there is a drive across the globe towards the

exploration of various biorefinery systems. Production of biofuel creates impact in utilization of biomass, replacement of possible extend of gasoline, reduction of greenhouse gas emission and the creation of significant amount of coproducts [112]. Biofuel production from biomass tends to strengthen the entire value chain (farming community-biofuel industries-consumers) andclaimsas theprobablesustainablealternatefortheconventionalfossilfuel systems.Biomass is the sustainable feedstockforbiofuelindustries andbiofuelprovides ecological safetytowards sustainable transportation, however the emerging concern is about the co/by-products. If they create challenging environmental issues in disposal, sustainability of this technology is challenged. Thus, value addition to these biofuel coproducts plays key role for the sustainabili‐ ty of biofuel technology in long term perspective [113]. With this understanding, the ultimate aim of biorefinery is focused to satisfy the conceptual "triple bottom line" of sustainability that includes (i) economic development; commercial value for biomasses, biofuels and coproducts, (ii) socialdevelopment; appearance ofnewmanufacturingsectors aswell as creationofruraljob opportunities, and (iii) environmental/resource sustainability; greenhouse gas reduction and eco-friendly green products [114]. In order to ensure the sustainability of biofuel technology it is essential to address various issues including (i) "food vs. fuel" due to the usage of edible resource for biofuel production, (ii) resource availability/management; effective utilization of land/water resources, (iii) environmental impact; issues related to land/water quality reten‐ tion, conversion of grasslands/forests to agricultural fields and the efficient disposal/utiliza‐ tion of biofuel coproducts and (iv) validated measures: policy making and certification/ standardization [115]. Scale-up activities of biofuel production is essential due to the increas‐ ing demand for the substitution of fossil fuel. However, it is significantly controlled by vari‐ ous factors such as effective land usage for the larger biomass generation, water availability for agricultural forming, retention of soil quality, environmental impact of biofuel coproducts and labor market shift towards biorefinery [116-117]. The successive transformation of biofuel production from conventional to second generation effectively addresses the issues related to water consumption. Lignocellulosic ethanol industries utilise perennial crops such as miscan‐ thusandswitchgrass,whichgrowsonmarginallandandconsumeverylesswater.Thechallenge istowardsbiofuelcoproducts.Failureofhandlingtheselargequantitycoproductswillultimately create serious environmental issues. These emerging technologies related to the effective utilizationofbiofuel coproducts thatholds significantquantityofrenewablecontent significant‐ ly substitute/ replace petroleum-based products and helps in reduction of greenhouse gas emission.

essing aspects are taken into account. It is less than ten years that DDGS-containing biocom‐ posites has been reported in the literature. In this regard, the very first produced DDGScontaining composites exhibited low mechanical properties so that the utilization of DDG(S) as a biofiller in composite materials seemed to be not worthy in the beginning. However, recent

Coproducts of Biofuel Industries in Value-Added Biomaterials Uses: A Move Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55382

505

Polyolefins such as polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene (PE) were the first polymers compounded with DDGS up to 30 wt% [118]. The mentioned work included a comparison of four types of biofiller such as big blue stem (BBS) grass, soybean hull, pinewood and DDGS in terms of the mechanical performance of the their biocomposites with PP and PE. The composite processing was performed in a twin screw extruder and mechanical properties tests were conducted. Generally, the studied biofillers increased the flexural and tensile moduli. However, DDGS increased the modulus not significantly in comparison with neat PE and PP. Moreover, the tensile and flexural strengths decreased drastically as a result of compounding with DDGS. In general, the authors of [118] came to a conclusion that DDGS is not a suitable biofiller because of the decreased mechanical properties of the studied DDGS/polyolefin composites. In another work, the composite of high density PE with DDGS has been produced via extrusion and injection molding technique with DDGS content of 25 wt% [119]. The effect of maleated polyethylene (MAPE) as the compatibilizer was studied. Moreover, DDGS was solvent-treated to remove its oil and polar extractables. It has been reported that the application of the MAPP with solvent-treated DDGS resulted in better tensile and flexural properties of

This is another attempt of biomaterial application of DDGS. The overall idea of such work was to utilize a tough binder between rigid particles of DDGS to create an acceptable flexible material. Thus, polyurethane prepolymer (PUP) from castor oil was used as a binder with different compositions of DDGS and the biocomposites were prepared in a two-step process; PUP and DDGS were premixed in a micro-extruder and then compression molded to the shape of sheet. The mechanical and dynamic mechanical properties characterizations showed that the produced PUP/DDGS sheet was more flexible compared to the brittle DDGS material, thus

Tatara et al. [121-122] bonded DDGS particles, from 0 to 90 wt%, with phenolic resin via compression molding process. Mechanical properties of the blends showed a reduction in modulus, tensile strength and elongation at yield by increasing the DDGS amount. However, the researchers believed that the cost saving resulted from the addition of low-cost DDGS filler in a reasonable quantity may offset the reduction in property performance; i.e. a cost-per‐ formance balance is achieved. In this context, inclusion of 25 and 50 wt% of DDGS maintained the mechanical strength to an acceptable value. In another work, the effect of DDGS particle

works project a better future for DDG(S)-based biocomposites.

the composite compared to the respective properties of the neat HDPE.

*3.1.1.1. DDGS-polyolefin biocomposites*

*3.1.1.2. DDGS-polyurethane biocomposites*

*3.1.1.3. DDGS-phenolic resin biocomposites*

polyurethane enhanced the properties of DDGS [120].

#### **3. Value-added biomaterials from biofuel coproducts**

#### **3.1. Distillers' grains**

#### *3.1.1. As biofiller in producing polymeric biocomposites*

The low cost of distillers' grains (DDG and DDGS) is a key incentive for researchers to utilize them as biobased fillers in manufacturing polymer composites. Also, addition of DDG(S) to the polymer matrix can result in improved stiffness as long as proper treatments and proc‐ essing aspects are taken into account. It is less than ten years that DDGS-containing biocom‐ posites has been reported in the literature. In this regard, the very first produced DDGScontaining composites exhibited low mechanical properties so that the utilization of DDG(S) as a biofiller in composite materials seemed to be not worthy in the beginning. However, recent works project a better future for DDG(S)-based biocomposites.

#### *3.1.1.1. DDGS-polyolefin biocomposites*

Polyolefins such as polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene (PE) were the first polymers compounded with DDGS up to 30 wt% [118]. The mentioned work included a comparison of four types of biofiller such as big blue stem (BBS) grass, soybean hull, pinewood and DDGS in terms of the mechanical performance of the their biocomposites with PP and PE. The composite processing was performed in a twin screw extruder and mechanical properties tests were conducted. Generally, the studied biofillers increased the flexural and tensile moduli. However, DDGS increased the modulus not significantly in comparison with neat PE and PP. Moreover, the tensile and flexural strengths decreased drastically as a result of compounding with DDGS. In general, the authors of [118] came to a conclusion that DDGS is not a suitable biofiller because of the decreased mechanical properties of the studied DDGS/polyolefin composites. In another work, the composite of high density PE with DDGS has been produced via extrusion and injection molding technique with DDGS content of 25 wt% [119]. The effect of maleated polyethylene (MAPE) as the compatibilizer was studied. Moreover, DDGS was solvent-treated to remove its oil and polar extractables. It has been reported that the application of the MAPP with solvent-treated DDGS resulted in better tensile and flexural properties of the composite compared to the respective properties of the neat HDPE.

#### *3.1.1.2. DDGS-polyurethane biocomposites*

This is another attempt of biomaterial application of DDGS. The overall idea of such work was to utilize a tough binder between rigid particles of DDGS to create an acceptable flexible material. Thus, polyurethane prepolymer (PUP) from castor oil was used as a binder with different compositions of DDGS and the biocomposites were prepared in a two-step process; PUP and DDGS were premixed in a micro-extruder and then compression molded to the shape of sheet. The mechanical and dynamic mechanical properties characterizations showed that the produced PUP/DDGS sheet was more flexible compared to the brittle DDGS material, thus polyurethane enhanced the properties of DDGS [120].

#### *3.1.1.3. DDGS-phenolic resin biocomposites*

Tatara et al. [121-122] bonded DDGS particles, from 0 to 90 wt%, with phenolic resin via compression molding process. Mechanical properties of the blends showed a reduction in modulus, tensile strength and elongation at yield by increasing the DDGS amount. However, the researchers believed that the cost saving resulted from the addition of low-cost DDGS filler in a reasonable quantity may offset the reduction in property performance; i.e. a cost-per‐ formance balance is achieved. In this context, inclusion of 25 and 50 wt% of DDGS maintained the mechanical strength to an acceptable value. In another work, the effect of DDGS particle size and content (25 and 50%) was studied when phenolic resin-based glue and wood glue were used to produce DDGS composites [123]. Overall, the DDGS composite with resin glue showed better mechanical properties and curing uniformity compared to wood glue/DDGS composites. Also, DDGS enhanced the flexural properties such as modulus and maximum stress. Also, composites of DDGS with smaller particle size (0.7 mm) had higher mechanical properties compared to those with higher particle size (0.34 mm).

#### *3.1.1.4. DDGS biopolymer biocomposites*

During recent years, biopolymer thermoplastics such as poly(lactic acid), PLA [124], poly(bu‐ tylene succinate), PBS [125], polyhydroxy(butyrate-co-valerate)/poly(butylene succinate), PHBV/PBS, blend [126] and poly(butylene adipate-co-terephatalate), PBAT [127] have been utilized to produce DDGS composites. The influence of DDGS amount from 20 to 50 wt% as well as compatibilizer in PLA/DDGS composites were investigated [124]. Drastic decrease in tensile modulus and strength was observed by increasing the wt% of DDGS when no compa‐ tibilizer was used. On the other hand, after using isocyanate type of compatibilizer, a huge improvement in tensile modulus and strength was observed in the PLA/20% DDGS composite (Figure 8). In comparison with pure PLA, the compatibilized formulation showed higher modulus and almost equal strength. In another work, the thermal degradation of DDGS was studied with considerations for biocomposite processing and it was reported that waterwashing of DDGS improved the thermal stability of DDGS to the extent that its thermal decomposition was highly prevented at typical temperatures of polymer melt processing. Such improvement in thermal stability of DDGS resulted in better strength and modulus of the PBS/ DDGS biocomposite with 30 wt% DDGS [125]. The effect of compatibilizer was studied in a composite of 30 wt% DDGS and PHBV/PBS blend processed in a micro-extruder/microinjection molding machine [126]. The DDGS used in this biocomposite had a water-washing step prior to compounding with bioplastics. Using a compatibilizer (isocyanate type), the interfacial adhesion was enhanced. The optimized biopolymer/DDGS composite exhibited improved tensile modulus compared to the biopolymer matrix while having almost equal strength. The influence of DDGS on the biodegradability properties of PBAT/DDGS biocom‐ posites has been evaluated [127]. It was observed that PBAT/DDGS biocomposite was found to be more bio-susceptible material compared to virgin PBAT and was totally biodegraded. During the biodegradation experiment DDGS domains were preferentially attacked by microorganisms and influenced the biodegradability of the PBAT matrix. The produced biocomposite showed a degree of biodegradation similar to the biodegradation rate of natural materials such as DDGS and cellulose.

[55, 128]. The obtained oil can be used as precursor for biodiesel production. It has been also tried to extract fiber from DDGS with physical methods such as sieving and elutriation [129] or extract cellulose chemically by sodium hydroxide solution [54]. The obtained cellulose had properties suitable for films and absorbents. The bioadhesive formulation obtained from DDGS is another biomaterial application of this coproduct [130-131]. This glue is prepared by reaction with an aqueous base solution. Urea can be also included with the base. The obtained

**Figure 8.** The effect of compatibilizer on tensile strength of the biocomposite PLA-20wt% DDGS (drawn from the da‐

Pure PLA 0 0.25 0.5 1

Compatibilizer wt %

Coproducts of Biofuel Industries in Value-Added Biomaterials Uses: A Move Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy

**3.1.2. Other biomaterial applications** 

**3.1.1.2. DDGS-polyurethane biocomposites** 

thus polyurethane enhanced the properties of DDGS [120].

**3.1.1.3. DDGS-phenolic resin biocomposites** 

**3.1.1.4. DDGS biopolymer biocomposites** 

This is another attempt of biomaterial application of DDGS. The overall idea of such work was to utilize a tough binder between rigid particles of DDGS to create an acceptable flexible material. Thus, polyurethane prepolymer (PUP) from castor oil was used as a binder with different compositions of DDGS and the biocomposites were prepared in a two-step process; PUP and DDGS were premixed in a micro-extruder and then compression molded to the shape of sheet. The mechanical and dynamic mechanical properties characterizations showed that the produced PUP/DDGS sheet was more flexible compared to the brittle DDGS material,

Tatara et al. [121-122] bonded DDGS particles, from 0 to 90 wt%, with phenolic resin via compression molding process. Mechanical properties of the blends showed a reduction in modulus, tensile strength and elongation at yield by increasing the DDGS amount. However, the researchers believed that the cost saving resulted from the addition of low-cost DDGS filler in a reasonable quantity may offset the reduction in property performance; i.e. a cost-performance balance is achieved. In this context, inclusion of 25 and 50 wt% of DDGS maintained the mechanical strength to an acceptable value. In another work, the effect of DDGS particle size and content (25 and 50%) was studied when phenolic resin-based glue and wood glue were used to produce DDGS composites [123]. Overall, the DDGS composite with resin glue showed better mechanical properties and curing uniformity compared to wood glue/DDGS composites. Also, DDGS enhanced the flexural properties such as modulus and maximum stress. Also, composites of DDGS with smaller particle size (0.7 mm) had higher mechanical properties compared to those with higher particle size (0.34 mm).

During recent years, biopolymer thermoplastics such as poly(lactic acid), PLA [124], poly(butylene succinate), PBS [125], polyhydroxy(butyrate-co-valerate)/poly(butylene succinate), PHBV/PBS, blend [126] and poly(butylene adipate-co-terephatalate), PBAT [127] have been utilized to produce DDGS composites. The influence of DDGS amount from 20 to 50 wt% as well as compatibilizer in PLA/DDGS composites were investigated [124]. Drastic decrease in tensile modulus and strength was observed by increasing the wt% of DDGS when no compatibilizer was used. On the other hand, after using isocyanate type of compatibilizer, a huge improvement in tensile modulus and strength was observed in the PLA/20% DDGS composite (Figure 8). In comparison with pure PLA, the compatibilized formulation showed higher modulus and almost equal strength. In another work, the thermal degradation of DDGS was studied with considerations for biocomposite processing and it was reported that water-washing of DDGS improved the thermal stability of DDGS to the extent that its thermal decomposition was highly prevented at typical temperatures of polymer melt processing. Such improvement in thermal stability of DDGS resulted in better strength and modulus of the PBS/DDGS biocomposite with 30 wt% DDGS [125]. The effect of compatibilizer was studied in a composite of 30 wt% DDGS and PHBV/PBS blend processed in a micro-extruder/micro-injection molding machine [126]. The DDGS used in this biocomposite had a water-washing step prior to compounding with bioplastics. Using a compatibilizer (isocyanate type), the interfacial adhesion was enhanced. The optimized biopolymer/DDGS composite exhibited improved tensile modulus compared to the biopolymer matrix while having almost equal strength. The influence of DDGS on the biodegradability properties of PBAT/DDGS biocomposites has been evaluated [127]. It was observed that PBAT/DDGS biocomposite was found to be the most bio-susceptible material compared to virgin PBAT and was totally biodegraded. During the biodegradation experiment DDGS domains were preferentially attacked by microorganisms and influenced the biodegradability of the PBAT matrix. The produced biocomposite

showed a degree of biodegradation similar to the biodegradation rate of natural materials such as DDGS and cellulose.

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55382

507

Figure 8. The effect compatibilizer on tensile strength of the biocomposite of PLA-20wt% DDGS (drawn from the data table with permission) [124].

Recently, it has been tried to produce thermoplastics from DDGS by chemical methods such as acetylation [132] or cyanoethylation [133] with almost similar approaches. Hu et al. [133] were successful in producing highly flexible thermoplastic films from DDGS. The oil and zein protein of the DDGS were extracted first and the resultant underwent cyanoethylation using acrylonitrile. A compression molding machine was implemented to produce oil-and-zein-free DDGS films. It was observed that the produced films had much higher strength even at high elongations compared to films developed from other various biopolymers. Therefore, cya‐ noethylation could be a viable approach to develop bio-thermoplastics from biopolymers for applications such as packing films, extrudates and resins for composites. It has been also tried to find a novel use of dried distillers' grains (DDG) as a feedstock for bio-polyurethane preparation [134]. The procedure consist of, first, liquefaction of DDG in acidic conditions at atmospheric pressure and then reaction of hydroxyl-rich biopolyols in the liquefied DDG with methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) to form networks of cross-linked polyurethane. Thus, DDG-based bio-polyols were the precursor in this way to synthesize flexible and rigid polyurethane foams. The biodegradation tests showed that the degradation of these polyur‐ ethane foams in a 10-month period was about 12.6% most probably because of natural extracts such as proteins and fats in DDG and partially cross-linked or uncross-linked residue in the

bioadhesive is particularly useful as boxboard glue.

Tensile strength(MPa)

ta table with permission) [124].

foam [134].

#### *3.1.2. Other biomaterial applications*

DDGS as a source of protein, fiber and fat has been used to isolate these components. Xu et al. [53] implemented a novel acidic method to extract zein from DDGS which is the main protein in corn and corn coproducts such as DDGS. The resulted zein has the potential for uses in fibers, films, binders and paints applications. Their method also isolated DDGS oil during protein extraction. Other researchers have also investigated the extraction of oil from DDGS

material compared to virgin PBAT and was totally biodegraded. During the biodegradation experiment DDGS domains were preferentially attacked by microorganisms and influenced the biodegradability of the PBAT matrix. The produced biocomposite Coproducts of Biofuel Industries in Value-Added Biomaterials Uses: A Move Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55382 507

**3.1.1.2. DDGS-polyurethane biocomposites** 

thus polyurethane enhanced the properties of DDGS [120].

**3.1.1.3. DDGS-phenolic resin biocomposites** 

**3.1.1.4. DDGS biopolymer biocomposites** 

This is another attempt of biomaterial application of DDGS. The overall idea of such work was to utilize a tough binder between rigid particles of DDGS to create an acceptable flexible material. Thus, polyurethane prepolymer (PUP) from castor oil was used as a binder with different compositions of DDGS and the biocomposites were prepared in a two-step process; PUP and DDGS were premixed in a micro-extruder and then compression molded to the shape of sheet. The mechanical and dynamic mechanical properties characterizations showed that the produced PUP/DDGS sheet was more flexible compared to the brittle DDGS material,

Tatara et al. [121-122] bonded DDGS particles, from 0 to 90 wt%, with phenolic resin via compression molding process. Mechanical properties of the blends showed a reduction in modulus, tensile strength and elongation at yield by increasing the DDGS amount. However, the researchers believed that the cost saving resulted from the addition of low-cost DDGS filler in a reasonable quantity may offset the reduction in property performance; i.e. a cost-performance balance is achieved. In this context, inclusion of 25 and 50 wt% of DDGS maintained the mechanical strength to an acceptable value. In another work, the effect of DDGS particle size and content (25 and 50%) was studied when phenolic resin-based glue and wood glue were used to produce DDGS composites [123]. Overall, the DDGS composite with resin glue showed better mechanical properties and curing uniformity compared to wood glue/DDGS composites. Also, DDGS enhanced the flexural properties such as modulus and maximum stress. Also, composites of DDGS with smaller particle size (0.7 mm) had higher mechanical properties compared to those with higher particle size (0.34 mm).

During recent years, biopolymer thermoplastics such as poly(lactic acid), PLA [124], poly(butylene succinate), PBS [125], polyhydroxy(butyrate-co-valerate)/poly(butylene succinate), PHBV/PBS, blend [126] and poly(butylene adipate-co-terephatalate), PBAT [127] have been utilized to produce DDGS composites. The influence of DDGS amount from 20 to 50 wt% as well as compatibilizer in PLA/DDGS composites were investigated [124]. Drastic decrease in tensile modulus and strength was observed by increasing the wt% of DDGS when no compatibilizer was used. On the other hand, after using isocyanate type of compatibilizer, a huge improvement in tensile modulus and strength was observed in the PLA/20% DDGS composite (Figure 8). In comparison with pure PLA, the compatibilized formulation showed higher modulus and almost equal strength. In another work, the thermal degradation of DDGS was studied with considerations for biocomposite processing and it was reported that water-washing of DDGS improved the thermal stability of DDGS to the extent that its thermal decomposition was highly prevented at typical temperatures of polymer melt processing. Such improvement in thermal stability of DDGS resulted in better strength and modulus of the PBS/DDGS biocomposite with 30 wt% DDGS [125]. The effect of compatibilizer was studied in a composite of 30 wt% DDGS and PHBV/PBS blend processed in a micro-extruder/micro-injection molding machine [126]. The DDGS used in this biocomposite had a water-washing step prior to compounding with bioplastics. Using a compatibilizer (isocyanate type), the interfacial adhesion was enhanced. The optimized biopolymer/DDGS composite exhibited improved tensile modulus compared to the biopolymer matrix while having almost equal strength. The influence of DDGS on the biodegradability properties of PBAT/DDGS biocomposites has been evaluated [127]. It was observed that PBAT/DDGS biocomposite was found to be the most bio-susceptible

showed a degree of biodegradation similar to the biodegradation rate of natural materials such as DDGS and cellulose.

Figure 8. The effect compatibilizer on tensile strength of the biocomposite of PLA-20wt% DDGS (drawn from the data table with permission) [124]. **Figure 8.** The effect of compatibilizer on tensile strength of the biocomposite PLA-20wt% DDGS (drawn from the da‐ ta table with permission) [124].

**3.1.2. Other biomaterial applications** 

[55, 128]. The obtained oil can be used as precursor for biodiesel production. It has been also tried to extract fiber from DDGS with physical methods such as sieving and elutriation [129] or extract cellulose chemically by sodium hydroxide solution [54]. The obtained cellulose had properties suitable for films and absorbents. The bioadhesive formulation obtained from DDGS is another biomaterial application of this coproduct [130-131]. This glue is prepared by reaction with an aqueous base solution. Urea can be also included with the base. The obtained bioadhesive is particularly useful as boxboard glue.

Recently, it has been tried to produce thermoplastics from DDGS by chemical methods such as acetylation [132] or cyanoethylation [133] with almost similar approaches. Hu et al. [133] were successful in producing highly flexible thermoplastic films from DDGS. The oil and zein protein of the DDGS were extracted first and the resultant underwent cyanoethylation using acrylonitrile. A compression molding machine was implemented to produce oil-and-zein-free DDGS films. It was observed that the produced films had much higher strength even at high elongations compared to films developed from other various biopolymers. Therefore, cya‐ noethylation could be a viable approach to develop bio-thermoplastics from biopolymers for applications such as packing films, extrudates and resins for composites. It has been also tried to find a novel use of dried distillers' grains (DDG) as a feedstock for bio-polyurethane preparation [134]. The procedure consist of, first, liquefaction of DDG in acidic conditions at atmospheric pressure and then reaction of hydroxyl-rich biopolyols in the liquefied DDG with methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) to form networks of cross-linked polyurethane. Thus, DDG-based bio-polyols were the precursor in this way to synthesize flexible and rigid polyurethane foams. The biodegradation tests showed that the degradation of these polyur‐ ethane foams in a 10-month period was about 12.6% most probably because of natural extracts such as proteins and fats in DDG and partially cross-linked or uncross-linked residue in the foam [134].

#### **3.2. Bagasse**

Bagasse has been used in biomaterial applications since a very long time ago. It has been used for interior panels and particleboard production. The first bagasse composition panel plant in Americas was built by Celotex, Louisiana, in 1920. Since then, more than 20 bagasse particle‐ board plants have been built throughout the world [135]. However, recent characterization of bagasse fiber for its chemical, physical and mechanical properties indicates that the potential of this coproduct of sugar and biofuel industries is much more than its applications in interior and structural components [136]. Bagasse is mostly burnt to generate energy for the sugar industry itself. Considering the fact that for such purpose almost 50% of the bagasse's production is enough [137], it is necessary to develop new uses for these fibers to implement the rest 50 % and reduce their environmental impact. Moreover, the burning of bagasse fiber is also a matter of concern as far as atmospheric pollution because of smoke, soot and ash is concerned [138]. Chemical composition as well as physical and mechanical properties of bagasse fiber are presented in Table 2 [136, 139-142]. Bagasse fiber consists of structural components such as cellulose and hemicellulose that can provide stiffness and rigidity to the polymers and enhance their engineering applications. Besides, bagasse exhibits a porous cellular structure with a hollow cavity called lumen existing in unit cell of the fibers. Therefore, the bulk density of bagasse fiber is lower than other natural fibers and bagasse fibers can act more effectively as thermal and acoustic insulators [142]. For example, the densities of kenaf and banana fibers are 749 kg m-3 [140] and 1350-1500 kg m-3 [139], respectively, which are higher than that of bagasse (344-492 kg m-3 [139-140]). Also, cellulosic fibers such as bagasse with low Young's modulus can act as useful crack growth inhibitors [143].

*3.2.1. Bagasse particleboards*

pressing [74] have been conducted.

*3.2.2. Bagasse-thermoset biocomposites*

esterification.

than composites with untreated fiber [142].

Bagasse particleboards generally consist of bagasse fibers bound together with either an organic or inorganic binder. The organic binders are mostly a phenolic or polyester thermoset resins and the board is produced by compression molding under high pressure and temper‐ ature. Different inorganic binders such as cement, gypsum and calcined magnesite can also be used to produce bagasse boards [144-146]. Besides, binderless bagasse particleboards have been produced and patented in 1986 which can simplify the manufacturing process and reduce production cost since the blending operation and equipment are eliminated [147]. In this regards, different processing techniques such as hot pressing [148] and steam-injection

Coproducts of Biofuel Industries in Value-Added Biomaterials Uses: A Move Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55382

509

Phenolic resins are the major thermosets used for bagasse particleboards and several studies have been published on using resol [137], Novolac [149], lignophenolic [150] and other phenolic resins [143, 151] with bagasse fiber. Zárate et al. [137] studied the effect of fiber volume fraction on the density and flexural properties of composites from resol and several fibers including bagasse. They compared the efficiency criterion for mechanical performance, which relates the strength and stiffness with density, of the composites with those of typical structural materials including aluminum, magnesium, polyethylene and steel. Based on this comparison, it was concluded that the stiff composite materials produced from bagasse fibers and resol matrix are better compared to typical structural materials such as steel [137]. The effect of maleic anhydride (MA) treatment of bagasse fiber on properties of its composite with Novolac has been studied [149]. It has been reported that the composites with MA treated fibers had a hardness of 2–3 times more than that of the untreated bagasse composite and MA treatment reduced water and steam absorption of the fibers. Paiva and Frollini [150] extracted lignin from sugarcane bagasse by the organosolv process and used it as a partial substitute of phenol in resole phenolic matrices to produce bagasse-lignophenolic composite by compression molding. They observed improvement in the impact strength when sugarcane bagasse was used, but no improvement was found as a result of fiber treatments such as mercerization and

Unsaturated polyesters are another family of thermoset resins used for bagasse-based composite purposes. The effect of fiber size, its surface quality and the compression molding parameters on the flexural properties of composites from polyester and chopped bagasse fiber has been investigated. It was found that composites produced with bagasse particle size of less than 2 mm, and pre-treated for the extraction of sugar and alcohol exhibited the highest mechanical performance [138]. The effect of chemical treatments using sodium hydroxide and acrylic acid on the properties of bagasse-polyester composites has been studied. The treatments resulted in the better interaction between fiber and matrix as well as lower water absorption


**Table 2.** Chemical composition, physical and mechanical properties of bagasse fiber

#### *3.2.1. Bagasse particleboards*

Bagasse particleboards generally consist of bagasse fibers bound together with either an organic or inorganic binder. The organic binders are mostly a phenolic or polyester thermoset resins and the board is produced by compression molding under high pressure and temper‐ ature. Different inorganic binders such as cement, gypsum and calcined magnesite can also be used to produce bagasse boards [144-146]. Besides, binderless bagasse particleboards have been produced and patented in 1986 which can simplify the manufacturing process and reduce production cost since the blending operation and equipment are eliminated [147]. In this regards, different processing techniques such as hot pressing [148] and steam-injection pressing [74] have been conducted.

#### *3.2.2. Bagasse-thermoset biocomposites*

Phenolic resins are the major thermosets used for bagasse particleboards and several studies have been published on using resol [137], Novolac [149], lignophenolic [150] and other phenolic resins [143, 151] with bagasse fiber. Zárate et al. [137] studied the effect of fiber volume fraction on the density and flexural properties of composites from resol and several fibers including bagasse. They compared the efficiency criterion for mechanical performance, which relates the strength and stiffness with density, of the composites with those of typical structural materials including aluminum, magnesium, polyethylene and steel. Based on this comparison, it was concluded that the stiff composite materials produced from bagasse fibers and resol matrix are better compared to typical structural materials such as steel [137]. The effect of maleic anhydride (MA) treatment of bagasse fiber on properties of its composite with Novolac has been studied [149]. It has been reported that the composites with MA treated fibers had a hardness of 2–3 times more than that of the untreated bagasse composite and MA treatment reduced water and steam absorption of the fibers. Paiva and Frollini [150] extracted lignin from sugarcane bagasse by the organosolv process and used it as a partial substitute of phenol in resole phenolic matrices to produce bagasse-lignophenolic composite by compression molding. They observed improvement in the impact strength when sugarcane bagasse was used, but no improvement was found as a result of fiber treatments such as mercerization and esterification.

Unsaturated polyesters are another family of thermoset resins used for bagasse-based composite purposes. The effect of fiber size, its surface quality and the compression molding parameters on the flexural properties of composites from polyester and chopped bagasse fiber has been investigated. It was found that composites produced with bagasse particle size of less than 2 mm, and pre-treated for the extraction of sugar and alcohol exhibited the highest mechanical performance [138]. The effect of chemical treatments using sodium hydroxide and acrylic acid on the properties of bagasse-polyester composites has been studied. The treatments resulted in the better interaction between fiber and matrix as well as lower water absorption than composites with untreated fiber [142].

#### *3.2.3. Bagasse-thermoplastic biocomposites*

Bagasse has been used as reinforcing filler in different thermoplastic matrices such as poly(eth‐ ylene-co-vinyl acetate) (or EVA) [152-153], polyolefins [154-155] and starch-based biodegrad‐ able polyester [140-141, 156-157]. The effect of cultivar type and surface cleaning of the bagasse fiber on the tensile properties of the bagasse-EVA composites have been investigated [152]. The results suggested that blends of bagasse from various cultivars can be used for commercial applications of these composites. Also, the surface cleaning of the bagasse obtained from sugar mill was good enough to use the bagasse without further surface treatment. Another study on the impact behavior of the bagasse-EVA composites showed that the mechanical performance of this type of composites could be tailored by varying the bagasse volume fraction in order to reproduce the behavior of wood-based particleboards [153]. Luz et al. [154] explored the efficiency of two different processing methods, injection molding and compression molding, to produce bagasse-polypropylene (PP) composite. They found that the injection molding under vacuum process was more efficient and created homogeneous distribution of fibers without blisters. It was observed that bagasse incorporation into PP improved the flexural modulus. High density polyethylene (HDPE) was used as the matrix for incorporation of cellulose obtained from bagasse [155]. It has been reported that modification of bagasse cellulose with zirconium oxychloride helped in improving the tensile strength of the biocom‐ posite.

**3.3. Lignin**

section.

*3.3.1. Polymeric blends and composites from lignin*

combinations of the lignins are unique [166].

*3.3.1.1. Lignin in thermoplastics*

Biomaterials applications of lignin for the fabrication of polymers, blends and their reinforced composites are highly motivated due to the following reasons (i) abundance/occurrence in nature, (ii) phenolic chemical structure and the possibility of chemical modification and (iii) eco friendliness and reduced carbon footprint [160]. The challenge to use lignin as the materials feedstock is their complicated chemical structure as well as molecular weight, which are highly dependent on the lignin extracting process and also their sources [161]. The biomaterials application of lignin is vast and it has been blended/ reinforced with a wide range of polymeric systems such as thermoplastics, thermosets and elastomers as a renewable low cost filler [162]. Utilization of lignin as the raw material for the fabrication carbonaceous materials such as activated carbon and carbon fibres has a long history, however the creation of nanostructured materials such as carbon nanoparticles/nanofibres are quite new, which has a huge commercial potential [95, 163]. The emerging opportunities for lignin in these areas are summarized in this

Coproducts of Biofuel Industries in Value-Added Biomaterials Uses: A Move Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55382

511

In polymers, lignins have been used as low-cost fillers aiming to retain their mechanical properties. Nitz et al. [164] reported the influence of various types of lignin reinforcement with the thermoplastics on their mechanical properties. Their results indicate that they are able to incorporate ~40 wt% lignin in to polyamide 11 (PA11), polyester (Ecoflex®) and polyestera‐ mide (BAK®) systems without impairing their mechanical properties [164]. Generally lignin shows high cross-linking/intramolecular interactions, which limits their application in solid material systems. This can be overcome through polymer blending; however, achieving miscibility is very essential to develop a material system with superior properties [165]. This is possible in lignin-based blends by manipulating the chemistry of hydrogen bonding between the OH groups and interacting sites of polymers, either polar or semi polar [165]. Moreover, the hydrogen bond with a polymer varies with lignin to lignin since the monomer

Lignin–thermoplastic blends can be classified into two categories and they are (i) lignin – petrobased polymer blends and (ii) lignin–renewable resources based polymer blends. Blending the lignin with polyethylene and polypropylene is well known [166-169]. Alexy et al. [166] reported the effect of lignin concentration in the fabrication of polymeric blend with PP and PE. They measured the tensile strength as the measure of mechanical properties over the various lignin compositions. For both the polymer systems they identified that the mechanical properties decrease with increasing lignin content [166]. In addition to mechanical properties, Canetti et al. [169] and Mikulášová et al. [170] reported the fabrication of lignin/PP blends and investigated their thermal and biodegradable properties respectively. Poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) is the next popular thermoplastic, which has been produced globally and exhibits a wide range of applications [171]. Raghi and coworkers [171] reported the fabrication of lignin/PVC blend and studied their mechanical/weathering properties. Their research investigation

Bagasse fibers have been used to produce biocomposites from bagasse and biodegradable corn starch-based polyester which is reported as a blend of starch and polycaprolactone (PCL). The effects of volume fraction and fiber length were investigated and an optimum value for both factor were reported beyond which the decrease in mechanical performance was observed [140]. Also, it was reported that after alkali treatment of the bagasse fibers the improvement in fibre–matrix adhesion occurred that resulted in enhancement of mechanical properties [141]. Moreover, incorporation of bagasse fiber into the polyester matrix improved tensile as well as impact strength. Acetylated starch has been reinforced with bagasse fiber [156-157]. The matrix in that case was a blend of starch, PCL and glycerol. It was observed that incorporation of alkali-treated bagasse fiber up to 15 wt% increased the tensile strength while it decreased when bagasse content was more than this value. Also, the water absorption of the composite was improved as the bagasse content increased due to hydrophobic nature of bagasse compared to acetylated starch.

#### *3.2.4. Other biomaterial applications*

It has been also tried to convert bagasse fibers into a thermo-formable material through esterification [158-159]. This has been done without any solvent using succinic anhydride followed by hot-pressing to produce the test samples. The thermoplasticization of the esterified fibers was proven to occur by scanning electron microscopy. By studying the effect of pressing parameters, it has been found that that de-esterification and hemicellulose degradation could occur on certain pressing conditions. It has been claimed that the mechanical properties of the produced composite could be superior to the standard properties of conventional high density wood particleboards.

#### **3.3. Lignin**

Biomaterials applications of lignin for the fabrication of polymers, blends and their reinforced composites are highly motivated due to the following reasons (i) abundance/occurrence in nature, (ii) phenolic chemical structure and the possibility of chemical modification and (iii) eco friendliness and reduced carbon footprint [160]. The challenge to use lignin as the materials feedstock is their complicated chemical structure as well as molecular weight, which are highly dependent on the lignin extracting process and also their sources [161]. The biomaterials application of lignin is vast and it has been blended/ reinforced with a wide range of polymeric systems such as thermoplastics, thermosets and elastomers as a renewable low cost filler [162]. Utilization of lignin as the raw material for the fabrication carbonaceous materials such as activated carbon and carbon fibres has a long history, however the creation of nanostructured materials such as carbon nanoparticles/nanofibres are quite new, which has a huge commercial potential [95, 163]. The emerging opportunities for lignin in these areas are summarized in this section.

#### *3.3.1. Polymeric blends and composites from lignin*

#### *3.3.1.1. Lignin in thermoplastics*

In polymers, lignins have been used as low-cost fillers aiming to retain their mechanical properties. Nitz et al. [164] reported the influence of various types of lignin reinforcement with the thermoplastics on their mechanical properties. Their results indicate that they are able to incorporate ~40 wt% lignin in to polyamide 11 (PA11), polyester (Ecoflex®) and polyestera‐ mide (BAK®) systems without impairing their mechanical properties [164]. Generally lignin shows high cross-linking/intramolecular interactions, which limits their application in solid material systems. This can be overcome through polymer blending; however, achieving miscibility is very essential to develop a material system with superior properties [165]. This is possible in lignin-based blends by manipulating the chemistry of hydrogen bonding between the OH groups and interacting sites of polymers, either polar or semi polar [165]. Moreover, the hydrogen bond with a polymer varies with lignin to lignin since the monomer combinations of the lignins are unique [166].

Lignin–thermoplastic blends can be classified into two categories and they are (i) lignin – petrobased polymer blends and (ii) lignin–renewable resources based polymer blends. Blending the lignin with polyethylene and polypropylene is well known [166-169]. Alexy et al. [166] reported the effect of lignin concentration in the fabrication of polymeric blend with PP and PE. They measured the tensile strength as the measure of mechanical properties over the various lignin compositions. For both the polymer systems they identified that the mechanical properties decrease with increasing lignin content [166]. In addition to mechanical properties, Canetti et al. [169] and Mikulášová et al. [170] reported the fabrication of lignin/PP blends and investigated their thermal and biodegradable properties respectively. Poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) is the next popular thermoplastic, which has been produced globally and exhibits a wide range of applications [171]. Raghi and coworkers [171] reported the fabrication of lignin/PVC blend and studied their mechanical/weathering properties. Their research investigation confirmed that the addition of lignin to PVC enhanced their tensile strength and not influenced their weathering behavior. Banu et al. [172] reported the fabrication of PVC/lignin blends and investigated the effect of plasticizer in their formulations. They concluded that the specific thermal and mechanical properties are feasible in some formulations with the addition of plasticizer. In addition to that, lignin/ poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) and lignin/ poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) blend systems with various types of lignins are also investigated for the effective electrospinning performance [173-176]. Sahoo et al., [92] reported the fabrication of polybuty‐ lene succinate (PBS) reinforced with renewable resource-based lignin employing a melt extrusion process. They found that lignin reinforcement in PBS enhances their properties synergistically and also achieved the incorporation of high fraction of lignin of about 65%. In addition to that, they also reported the fabrication of PBS-based composite materials with the hybrid reinforcement of lignin and other natural fibre [93]. They found that the hybrid reinforcement is more beneficial over individual reinforcement for the better flexural strength.

solubility of lignin into the resin system and their result on natural fibre composites indicateed the compatibilizing effect of lignin. Nonaka et al. [185] reported the fabrication of a new resin system by aqueous mixing of alkaline kraft lignin with polyethylene glycol diglycidyl ether (PEGDGE),andacuringreagent.Theyidentifiedthecompletecompatibilitybetweenligninand

Coproducts of Biofuel Industries in Value-Added Biomaterials Uses: A Move Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55382

513

Although the history of lignin/rubber blend started in 1949, a very little work has been performed till date [186]. The role of lignin in rubber is identified as reinforcing filler and stabilizer or antioxidant. Kumaran et al. [186] performed an extensive research on the utiliza‐ tion of lignins in rubber compounding and identified the improvement of many properties. They reported that the addition of lignin into rubber improved their tear, abrasion and flexural crack resistances. Košíková et al. [167] investigated the reinforcement effect of sulfur-free lignin with styrene butadiene rubber (SBR). They identified that the lignin blending with SBR influenced their vulcanizing behavior and enhanced the various physicomechanical properties significantly. In addition to that, Wang et al. [187] investigated the fabrication of latex/modified lignin blend and identified their effective water barrier properties. Processing condition of the lignin/rubber is critical for the achievement of better properties. Tibenham et al. [188] reported the hot-milling of lignin/rubber precursors with hexamethylenetetramine, which yields a vulcanizate. They also found that the modulus, tensile strength, and hardness properties were

Polyurethanes are made of diisocyanate and polyol precursors, which have been used for the highly diversified applications. Traditionally, they were made from petroleum-based synthetic polyols and nowadays soy-based polyols are also widely used as the renewable feedstock. Nakamura and his co-researchers [189] investigated the lignin-based polyurethane (PU) films using polyethylene glycol (PEG) and diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI). They reported the thermal behavior of new polyurethane system, which indicates that the addition of lignin to PEG enhances their Tg proportionally. The combination of lignin and PEG for the formation of polyurethane resulted in various types of microstructure such as soft and flexible and hard. Their mechanical properties were highly dependent on their distribution as well as crosslinking ability between lignin-PEG-MDI segments [190]. Sarkar et al. [191] reported the synthesis of lignin–hydroxyl terminated polybutadiene (HTPB) co-polyurethanes using toluene diisocyanate as initiator. Their characterizations showed the better properties up to 3% lignin incorporation and further increment of lignin caused the reduction in their properties [191]. Saraf et al. [192-194] made an extensive research on various aspects of lignin-based polyurethane and suggested their suitable formulations for the enhanced performance. In addition to that, various types of lignin also investigated for the fabrication of polyurethane systems [195-196]. Thring et al. [195] reported the fabrication of polyurethanes from Alcell®. They found that the increasing lignin content decreases the degree of swelling and cross-

PEGDGE though the studies on dynamic mechanical analysis.

in the same order as the rubber reinforced with carbon blacks.

*3.3.1.3. Ligninin rubber blends*

*3.3.1.4. Lignin in polyurethane*

The research on lignin-based polymer blends with renewable resource-based biopolymer is very limited. Only few publications are available in this content. Camargo et al. [177] reported the melt processing of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) with lignin, in which they used the lignin isolated from sugarcane bagasse. They found that the addition of lignin to PHBV caused a reduction in their mechanical properties, which is due to the zero integration of lignin and PHBV [177]. Mousavioun et al. [178] performed the processing of poly(hydroxybutyrate) (PHB)-soda lignin blend and studied its thermal behavior. They found that the addition of soda lignin formed the miscible blend and improved their overall thermal stability. However, they have not reported their mechanical properties [178]. Vengal et al. [179] investigated the blending effect of lignin with starch and gelatin for the fabrication of biode‐ gradable polymeric films. They found that the addition of lignin into starch can create better film with the composition of 90:10 (lignin: starch) and further increment of lignin content decreases their properties. Casetta et al. [180] fabricated the PLA and lignin blend and investigated their flame retardant behavior. They observed that the addition of lignin to PLA enhanced their flame retardant property comported to virgin PLA.

#### *3.3.1.2. Lignin in thermosets*

The lignins of different resources have been incorporated into various thermoset resins. Amorphous/heterogeneousnatureandthe complexstructural compositionofligninresulttheir behavior as either like a filler or like a reactive macromonomer in epoxy resin systems. Man‐ souri et al. [181] characterized the alkaline lignin and suggested their possible use for phenolformaldehyde resin due to the availability of huge OH groups. Peng et al. [182] reported the fabrication of phenol-formaldehyde thermoset resin with lignin fillers and investigated their chemo-rheologicalproperties.Theyfoundthatthecuringrateoftheresinsystemdecreasedwith increasing lignin content. Guigo et al. [183] fabricated the poly(furfuryl alcohol)/lignin compo‐ siteresinsandreportedtheirmonophasebehavior.Thisindicatesthereactivemonomerbehavior of lignin in this thermoset system. Thielemans et al. [184] investigated the effect of kraft lignin onunsaturatedthermosettingresin,whichwasamixtureof epoxidizedsoybeanoilandstyrene, for the fabrication of natural fibre reinforced thermoset composites. They found the complete solubility of lignin into the resin system and their result on natural fibre composites indicateed the compatibilizing effect of lignin. Nonaka et al. [185] reported the fabrication of a new resin system by aqueous mixing of alkaline kraft lignin with polyethylene glycol diglycidyl ether (PEGDGE),andacuringreagent.Theyidentifiedthecompletecompatibilitybetweenligninand PEGDGE though the studies on dynamic mechanical analysis.

#### *3.3.1.3. Ligninin rubber blends*

Although the history of lignin/rubber blend started in 1949, a very little work has been performed till date [186]. The role of lignin in rubber is identified as reinforcing filler and stabilizer or antioxidant. Kumaran et al. [186] performed an extensive research on the utiliza‐ tion of lignins in rubber compounding and identified the improvement of many properties. They reported that the addition of lignin into rubber improved their tear, abrasion and flexural crack resistances. Košíková et al. [167] investigated the reinforcement effect of sulfur-free lignin with styrene butadiene rubber (SBR). They identified that the lignin blending with SBR influenced their vulcanizing behavior and enhanced the various physicomechanical properties significantly. In addition to that, Wang et al. [187] investigated the fabrication of latex/modified lignin blend and identified their effective water barrier properties. Processing condition of the lignin/rubber is critical for the achievement of better properties. Tibenham et al. [188] reported the hot-milling of lignin/rubber precursors with hexamethylenetetramine, which yields a vulcanizate. They also found that the modulus, tensile strength, and hardness properties were in the same order as the rubber reinforced with carbon blacks.

#### *3.3.1.4. Lignin in polyurethane*

Polyurethanes are made of diisocyanate and polyol precursors, which have been used for the highly diversified applications. Traditionally, they were made from petroleum-based synthetic polyols and nowadays soy-based polyols are also widely used as the renewable feedstock. Nakamura and his co-researchers [189] investigated the lignin-based polyurethane (PU) films using polyethylene glycol (PEG) and diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI). They reported the thermal behavior of new polyurethane system, which indicates that the addition of lignin to PEG enhances their Tg proportionally. The combination of lignin and PEG for the formation of polyurethane resulted in various types of microstructure such as soft and flexible and hard. Their mechanical properties were highly dependent on their distribution as well as crosslinking ability between lignin-PEG-MDI segments [190]. Sarkar et al. [191] reported the synthesis of lignin–hydroxyl terminated polybutadiene (HTPB) co-polyurethanes using toluene diisocyanate as initiator. Their characterizations showed the better properties up to 3% lignin incorporation and further increment of lignin caused the reduction in their properties [191]. Saraf et al. [192-194] made an extensive research on various aspects of lignin-based polyurethane and suggested their suitable formulations for the enhanced performance. In addition to that, various types of lignin also investigated for the fabrication of polyurethane systems [195-196]. Thring et al. [195] reported the fabrication of polyurethanes from Alcell®. They found that the increasing lignin content decreases the degree of swelling and crosslinking and causes the formation of brittle and hard structures. Yoshida et al. [196] utilized the kraft lignin for the fabrication of polyurethanes. They reported that the increasing lignin content increases the cross-link density and generally causes a hard and brittle nature. They also fabricated the polyurethane from various kraft lignins with different molecular weight and found that the cross-link density has increased with increasing molecular weight [197]. These studies conclude that the higher loadings of lignin in polyurethane caused the formation of rigid structure due to higher cross-link density and resulted in poor mechanical properties. This can be overcome by employing suitable chemistry in controlling the order of crosslinking.

friendliness with the reduced carbon footprint. The biofeedstock exhibits a diversified morphology with the various combination of chemical structures, which can result in the formation of varieties of carbon nanostructures. Lignin has been widely used for the fabrication of activated carbon, however synthesizing carbon nanostructures such as particles/fibres are very new, thus next section summaries the effective uses of lignin as precursor for the

Coproducts of Biofuel Industries in Value-Added Biomaterials Uses: A Move Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55382

515

Lignin can be used as an efficient precursor in synthesizing carbonaceous nanomaterials with different morphology not only due to their carbon rich phenolic structure, but also for their capable chemical modification. Synthesizing the carbon nanoparticles with different morphol‐ ogy is possible by adopting various order of chemical modification as well as the processing conditions. The challenge is to inhibit the nucleation of carbon structures during the carboni‐ zation process to avoid larger particles, which normally occurs at elevated temperatures. Chemical modification can result in the formation of cross-linked structure, which normally alters the carbonization mechanism and can cause the formation of carbon nanostructures with different morphology. Babel et al. [215] reported the synthesis of KOH activated lignin-based carbon nanoparticles and their effective hydrogen storage capability. Recently, Gonugunta et al. reported the fabrication of carbon nanoparticels from lignin by adopting freeze drying

One dimensional (1D) nanostructures such as fibrous materials receives recent attention due to their unique physicochemical properties. A wide range of fabrication techniques have been used for the fabrication of fibrous nanomaterials, among them electrospinning has been found to be an efficient technique for the fabrication of various types of fibre nanostructures using polymeric solutions as precursors [218]. The fabrication of carbon nanofibres from lignin through electrospinning has three steps and they are (i) electrospinning of lignin fibres, (ii) thermal stabilization of lignin fibres and (iii) carbonization of thermo-stabilized lignin fibres [219]. Normally, lignin exhibits poor viscoelastic properties, which creates a lot of challenges during the electrospinning process. This can be overcome by blending the lignin with other kind of synthetic polymers such poly(ethylene oxide) [220]. Figure 9 shows the electrospun lignin fibre as the precursor for the fabrication of carbon nanofibres. Dallmeyer et al. [221] investigated seven different technical lignins (isolated lignin) for the fabrication of fibrous network. None of the lignins were able to be spun into fibres without a binding polymer such as PEO. In addition to PEO, utilization of polyacrylonitrile (PAN) as binding polymer was reported by Seo et al. for the fabrication of lignin-based carbon fibres [222]. The physicochem‐ ical properties and the morphology of lignin-based carbon nanofibres can be varied by manipulating the experimental parameters. Lallave et al. [219] reported the fabrication of various types of (filled and hollow) carbon nanofibers from Alcell lignins by coaxial electro‐ spinning. Uniqueness of their process is the successful electrospinning of lignin without binder

fabrication of carbon nanostructures and their emerging applications [213-214].

*3.3.3.1. Carbon nanoparticles*

process [216-217].

*3.3.3.2. Lignin-based carbon nanofibres*

#### *3.3.2. Lignin in adhesives*

Phenolic structure of lignin offers possible substitution with phenol-formaldehyde (PF) resin, which exhibits a wide range of applications as adhesives. Lignin substitute in phenol-formal‐ dehyde (PF) formulation can vary from 30 to 50%, which exhibits similar or better performance compared to virgin PF resin. Haars et al. [198] reported the fabrication of room-temperature curing adhesives using lignin and phenoloxidases as precursor chemicals. They reported the possible use of this new bioadhesive as thermosetting glue. They also indentified the increment of water resistance during the usage in particleboard production. Mansouri et al. [199] demonstrated the fabrication of lignin adhesives without formaldehyde for wood panel. Their synthesized lignin adhesives showed better internal bond strength, which also passed required international standard specifications. They found that the newly bioadhesive from lignin exhibits many properties comparable to formaldehyde-based commercial adhesives. Schneid‐ er et al. [200] patented the new technology for the fabrication of new kind of adhesives using furfuryl alcohol and lignin employing zinc chloride-based catalyst. Lignin isolated from bagasse was also experimented for the fabrication of biobased cost effective adhesives [201-202]. The obtained adhesives were used for the purpose of particleboard and wood adhesives.

#### *3.3.3. Lignin based carbon nanostructures*

Recently, carbonaceous nanomaterials that include carbon nanotubes, carbon nanofibres, graphene/graphite nanosheets and also particulate carbon nanostructures have received an extensive importance due to their possible commercial values in diversified areas like poly‐ meric composites, sensors, energy storage/ conversion, catalysis, filters and biology [203-208]. Traditionally, carbonaceous materials were prepared from petroleum-based precursors (liquid/gaseous hydrocarbons and carbon rich polymers such as polyacrylonitrile-PAN). As the global demand for carbon materials (nano/micro) grows continually and also the conven‐ tional sources are finite there is a need to investigate for the alternate carbon source. Thus, renewable resource-based biomaterials such as seed, oil, dried fibres as well as stem have been explored for the development of various carbon materials [209-212]. The challenge in using plant-based materials as carbon feedstock is to control the carbonizing process as well as the usage of suitable catalysis in order to achieve nanostructured materials. In addition to the larger availability of biobased feedstocks for the carbonaceous materials, it also provides ecofriendliness with the reduced carbon footprint. The biofeedstock exhibits a diversified morphology with the various combination of chemical structures, which can result in the formation of varieties of carbon nanostructures. Lignin has been widely used for the fabrication of activated carbon, however synthesizing carbon nanostructures such as particles/fibres are very new, thus next section summaries the effective uses of lignin as precursor for the fabrication of carbon nanostructures and their emerging applications [213-214].

#### *3.3.3.1. Carbon nanoparticles*

Lignin can be used as an efficient precursor in synthesizing carbonaceous nanomaterials with different morphology not only due to their carbon rich phenolic structure, but also for their capable chemical modification. Synthesizing the carbon nanoparticles with different morphol‐ ogy is possible by adopting various order of chemical modification as well as the processing conditions. The challenge is to inhibit the nucleation of carbon structures during the carboni‐ zation process to avoid larger particles, which normally occurs at elevated temperatures. Chemical modification can result in the formation of cross-linked structure, which normally alters the carbonization mechanism and can cause the formation of carbon nanostructures with different morphology. Babel et al. [215] reported the synthesis of KOH activated lignin-based carbon nanoparticles and their effective hydrogen storage capability. Recently, Gonugunta et al. reported the fabrication of carbon nanoparticels from lignin by adopting freeze drying process [216-217].

#### *3.3.3.2. Lignin-based carbon nanofibres*

One dimensional (1D) nanostructures such as fibrous materials receives recent attention due to their unique physicochemical properties. A wide range of fabrication techniques have been used for the fabrication of fibrous nanomaterials, among them electrospinning has been found to be an efficient technique for the fabrication of various types of fibre nanostructures using polymeric solutions as precursors [218]. The fabrication of carbon nanofibres from lignin through electrospinning has three steps and they are (i) electrospinning of lignin fibres, (ii) thermal stabilization of lignin fibres and (iii) carbonization of thermo-stabilized lignin fibres [219]. Normally, lignin exhibits poor viscoelastic properties, which creates a lot of challenges during the electrospinning process. This can be overcome by blending the lignin with other kind of synthetic polymers such poly(ethylene oxide) [220]. Figure 9 shows the electrospun lignin fibre as the precursor for the fabrication of carbon nanofibres. Dallmeyer et al. [221] investigated seven different technical lignins (isolated lignin) for the fabrication of fibrous network. None of the lignins were able to be spun into fibres without a binding polymer such as PEO. In addition to PEO, utilization of polyacrylonitrile (PAN) as binding polymer was reported by Seo et al. for the fabrication of lignin-based carbon fibres [222]. The physicochem‐ ical properties and the morphology of lignin-based carbon nanofibres can be varied by manipulating the experimental parameters. Lallave et al. [219] reported the fabrication of various types of (filled and hollow) carbon nanofibers from Alcell lignins by coaxial electro‐ spinning. Uniqueness of their process is the successful electrospinning of lignin without binder

octanoic acid on melt processing and tensile properties of CGM. In another work, di Gioia et al. [228] plasticized CGM with different plasticizers including water, glycerol, polyethylene glycols (PEG), glucose, urea, diethanolamine, and triethanolamine, at concentrations of 10– 30% (dwb). They implemented dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) to investigate the change in glass transition temperature and rheological moduli of CGM. Similarly, the effect of "polar" plasticizers (such as water, glycerol) or "amphiphilic" plasticizers (such as octanoic and palmitic acids, dibutyl tartrate and phthalate, and diacetyl tartaric acid ester of monodiglycerides) on the glass transition temperature of the CGM/plasticizer blends have been

Coproducts of Biofuel Industries in Value-Added Biomaterials Uses: A Move Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55382

517

Plasticized CGM has been blended with several polymers. Corradini et al. [230] blended CGM with different plastics such as starch, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and poly(hydroxybutyrate-cohydroxyvalerate), PHBV, using glycerol as plasticizer. After studying the glass transition temperature of the blends, they found that these blends are immiscible in the studied compo‐ sitional range. Also in terms of mechanical properties, PVA improved the flexibility while PHBV enhanced the rigidity and starch caused slight changes in mechanical properties. CGM has also been blended with poly(ε-caprolactone), PCL [231]. In this work, CGM was first plasticized using glycerol/ethanol mixture, denatured by the addition of guanidine hydro‐ chloride (GHCl), and then blended with PCL. They used twin screw extruder and injection molding for the processing. Their results showed that chemical modification of plasticized CGM with GHCl resulted in a high percent elongation. In another work CGM was blended with poly(lactic acid), PLA, plasticized with glycerol, water and ethanol using a single screw extruder followed by compression molding [212]. Their results showed that PLA enhanced the rigidity and improved the water resistance. CGM-wood fiber biocomposites have been the point of interest in several publications. CGM in these works has been used in the form of plasticized meal. Wu et al. [232] produced pellets of CGM-wood fiber, plasticized by glycerol, water and ethanol, to manufacture injection-molded plant pots for developing low cost, biodegradable containers used in agriculture. In another study, CGM plasticized with propylene glycol was blended with a biopolymer, poly(butylene succinate) (PBS), and wood fiber to produce a biodegradable material for plastic packaging applications [233]. The CGM content varied between 10–80 wt% and it was found that the produced biomaterial exhibited relatively high tensile strength, elongation at break and water resistance as long as the CGM content was less than 30 wt%. Similarly, CGM has been plasticized with different plasticizers such as glycerol, octanoic acid, polyethylene glycol and water, and reinforced with wood fiber using a twin screw extruder [234]. The best mechanical performance was achieved when a combination of 10 wt% octanoic acid and 30 wt% water was used as plasticizer with 20 wt% wood fibre as reinforcement. The mechanical properties were improved more when the CGM matrix was blended with polypropylene, coupling agent (maleated polypropylene) and cross-

linking agent (benzoyl peroxide) with 50 wt% wood fibre [234].

Soybean meal (SM) is still finding its way within scientific researches towards biobased material (biomaterial) applications. The number of publications on this topic is limited

reported [229].

*3.4.2. Soybean meal*

**Figure 9.** Electrospun lignin fibres (reprinted the figure with permission) [219].

polymer. Recently, Spender et al. [223] reported the rapid freezing process for the fabrication of lignin fibres with nano dimension.

#### **3.4. Proteineous meals**

As discussed in the previous sections, the major proteineous meal coproducts of biofuel industry are corn gluten meal from wet mill bioethanol and soybean meal from biodiesel industries. Different types of soy protein including soy flour (48% protein), soy protein concentrate (64% protein) and soy protein isolate (92% protein) can be extracted from soybean meal after oil extraction of soybean powder with hexane [224]. Similarly, corn gluten meal can be used to extract zein, the major protein in corn [225]. These proteins can be plasticized to produce films and formable thermoplastics. The biomaterial application of the these proteins has been investigated and reviewed extensively [225-226]. Recently, the biomaterial applica‐ tion of the meals themselves has attracted attentions and been studied in the form of plasticized meals as well as reinforcing fillers used in polymeric biocomposites.

#### *3.4.1. Corn gluten meal*

Corn gluten meal (CGM) is much cheaper than zein protein, thus creating more attraction compared to zein in producing thermoplastic materials. In this context, several plasticizers have been tried by many researchers for plasticization of CGM. Lawton and coworkers [227] studied the effect plasticizers such as glycerol, triethylene glycol (TEG), dibutyl tartrate, and octanoic acid on melt processing and tensile properties of CGM. In another work, di Gioia et al. [228] plasticized CGM with different plasticizers including water, glycerol, polyethylene glycols (PEG), glucose, urea, diethanolamine, and triethanolamine, at concentrations of 10– 30% (dwb). They implemented dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) to investigate the change in glass transition temperature and rheological moduli of CGM. Similarly, the effect of "polar" plasticizers (such as water, glycerol) or "amphiphilic" plasticizers (such as octanoic and palmitic acids, dibutyl tartrate and phthalate, and diacetyl tartaric acid ester of monodiglycerides) on the glass transition temperature of the CGM/plasticizer blends have been reported [229].

Plasticized CGM has been blended with several polymers. Corradini et al. [230] blended CGM with different plastics such as starch, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and poly(hydroxybutyrate-cohydroxyvalerate), PHBV, using glycerol as plasticizer. After studying the glass transition temperature of the blends, they found that these blends are immiscible in the studied compo‐ sitional range. Also in terms of mechanical properties, PVA improved the flexibility while PHBV enhanced the rigidity and starch caused slight changes in mechanical properties. CGM has also been blended with poly(ε-caprolactone), PCL [231]. In this work, CGM was first plasticized using glycerol/ethanol mixture, denatured by the addition of guanidine hydro‐ chloride (GHCl), and then blended with PCL. They used twin screw extruder and injection molding for the processing. Their results showed that chemical modification of plasticized CGM with GHCl resulted in a high percent elongation. In another work CGM was blended with poly(lactic acid), PLA, plasticized with glycerol, water and ethanol using a single screw extruder followed by compression molding [212]. Their results showed that PLA enhanced the rigidity and improved the water resistance. CGM-wood fiber biocomposites have been the point of interest in several publications. CGM in these works has been used in the form of plasticized meal. Wu et al. [232] produced pellets of CGM-wood fiber, plasticized by glycerol, water and ethanol, to manufacture injection-molded plant pots for developing low cost, biodegradable containers used in agriculture. In another study, CGM plasticized with propylene glycol was blended with a biopolymer, poly(butylene succinate) (PBS), and wood fiber to produce a biodegradable material for plastic packaging applications [233]. The CGM content varied between 10–80 wt% and it was found that the produced biomaterial exhibited relatively high tensile strength, elongation at break and water resistance as long as the CGM content was less than 30 wt%. Similarly, CGM has been plasticized with different plasticizers such as glycerol, octanoic acid, polyethylene glycol and water, and reinforced with wood fiber using a twin screw extruder [234]. The best mechanical performance was achieved when a combination of 10 wt% octanoic acid and 30 wt% water was used as plasticizer with 20 wt% wood fibre as reinforcement. The mechanical properties were improved more when the CGM matrix was blended with polypropylene, coupling agent (maleated polypropylene) and crosslinking agent (benzoyl peroxide) with 50 wt% wood fibre [234].

#### *3.4.2. Soybean meal*

Soybean meal (SM) is still finding its way within scientific researches towards biobased material (biomaterial) applications. The number of publications on this topic is limited compared to corn gluten meal. SM has been characterized for its chemical composition, moisture content, thermal behavior and infrared spectrum and its potential as a particulate filler in value-added biocomposites was evaluated by compounding with polycaprolactone (PCL) [235]. The composite of PCL/SM (70/30) was prepared by extrusion and injection molding and then tested for mechanical properties such as tensile, flexural and impact. It has been observed that PCL/SM composite exhibited higher tensile/flexural modulus, but lower strength, elongation and impact strength compared to PCL. At the same time, the resulted biocomposite had relatively less cost than PCL itself. Thus, addition of SM to PCL increases the rigidity, but the particle-matrix adhesion needs to be improved.

the source for the generation of green hydrogen for energy applications, (iv) carbon source: carbon sole source for bacterial growth, which effectively used for the generation of bioplastics and (v) polyesters: combine with suitable organic acids and forms polyesters for various materials applications. In materials point of view, crude glycerol's application in plasticising as well as polyesters formation receives an immense attention and is discussed in this section.

Coproducts of Biofuel Industries in Value-Added Biomaterials Uses: A Move Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55382

519

As the global demand increases for the development of biodegradable materials, starch-based plastics receives an immense attention. The challenge is their unusual inter and intra molecu‐ lar hydrogen bonds, which reduces their plastic performance [242]. This can be improved by incorporating plasticizers and manipulating processing conditions. Various plasticizers have been used on thermoplastic starch such as glycerol [243], glycol [244], sorbitol [245] and sugar [246]. Among them glycerol has been extensively used for the plasticization of starch-based materials. In addition to that, glycerol has also been used as an effective plasticizer in various othernaturalmaterialssuchascellulose[247],chitosan[248],gelatin[249],DDG[250]andprotein [233]. When these materials are plasticised with glycerol, their elasticity and toughness have been increased significantly with decreased brittleness. Numerous literatures are available for theglycerolplasticizednaturalproductsandmostoftheresearchershavepracticedpureglycerol as the precursor [233, 247-251]. Increasing trend of crude glycerol as plasticizer can be found in

Glycerol can be used to create polymeric materials by exploring their polyfunctionalreactivity and the obtained polymers can have various applications as polyols substitutes, lubricant, raw materials to produce resins, polyesters and polyurethanes [260]. Among them, polyest‐ ers and polyurethanes receive more importance for their large volume biomaterial applica‐ tions. The glycerol can easily react with carboxylic organic acids and forms polyesters, which can be used for various materials applications [260-261]. Carnahan et al. [262] demonstrat‐ ed the synthesis of glycerol-based polyesters using succinic and adipic acids. Likewise, Tang et al. [263] synthesized the aliphatic polyesters from glycerol using sebacic acid with elastic properties. In both the cases they were using pure glycerol as a precursor and more publications are also available for fabrication of various other types of polyesters [264-265]. However, very few research works have been published based on the crude glycerol as feedstock for polyester synthesis. Brioude et al. [261] reported the fabrication of new polyester from crude glycerol and adipic acid through the bulk polymerization. They found that the newly developed crude glycerol-based polyester was amorphous in nature and has good mechanical and thermal stability. Similarly de Moura et al. [260] reported the polymeriza‐ tion between the glycerol and mono/bi-functional organic groups for the fabrication of new class of polyesters. They were able to synthesise two different classes of polymers with variable thermal stability. Their ultimate aim was to utilize these newly developed polyest‐ ers as matrix for the fabrication of natural fibre-reinforced composite materials. The obtained features (physicochemical) of these newly synthesised polyesters can also be used as modifiers for various types of thermosets (epoxy resins) as well as polyurethanes. Urea-formalde‐ hyde (UF) has been widely known as an excellent adhesive used in wood panel fabrica‐ tion. The challenge is to overcome their limited moisture resistance. The polyols made form glycerol can be used to enhance their moisture resistance properties. Recently, fungi-based

the literature for the development of various types of biomaterials [252-259].

SM has been plasticized and blended with other polymers such as polycaprolactone (PCL), poly(butylenes succinate) (PBS), poly(butylene adipate terephthalate) (PBAT) [236-237], and natural rubber [238-239]. SM was plasticized and destructurized successfully using glycerol and urea in a twin screw extruder and then blended with biodegradable polyesters, PCL and PBS [236]. As a result of destructurization phenomenon, improvement occurred in mechanical properties of the protein-based blends. In another work, SM was plasticized using glycerol in presence of two different denaturants (destructurizers), and the resulted thermoplastic SM was blended with different polyesters, PBS, PCL and PBAT [237]. Taguchi experimental design was adopted to investigate the effect of each constituent on the tensile properties of the final blend. Wu et al. [238] produced vulcanized blend of natural rubber and 50 wt% SM. The rubber phase was embedded by the SM matrix suggesting the interaction between phases, also approved by the increase in the glass transition temperature of the rubber phase. The produced blend exhibited good elasticity and water resistance.

Another area of research conducted on SM is producing edible films from defatted SM for food packaging applications [240-241]. For this purpose, SM was fermented in a soybean meal solution (15 g/100 ml of water) by inoculation with Bacillus subtilis bacteria fermentated under optimum conditions of 33°C and pH 7.0-7.5 for 33 h. Then, the fermented soybean solution was heated for 20 min at 75°C with 2-3 ml glycerol added to the solution to overcome film brittleness. The filtered solution was finally casted in a petri dish to produce films. Increasing amount of plasticizer in the fermented film led to a decrease in tensile strength and an increase in % elongation of the film compared to the ordinary soybean film. Moreover, the SM-based film exhibited higher water vapor permeability. On the other hand, experiments showed that growth inhibition of the produced SM-based film in the agar media containing E. coli was much higher than the ordinary soy protein film. These results indicated that the fermented SM-based films can be used as a new packaging material to extend the shelf-life of foods; however mechanical and physical properties need to be improved for more industrial applications.

#### **3.5. Crude glycerol**

Value-added uses of crude glycerol from biodesiel industries are highly diversified and it can be classified in to following categories, (i) chemicals/monomers: extraction and chemical/ biological conversion approach for the synthesis of various precursors, (ii) plasticizer: use as low cost plasticizing agent in various biomaterials applications, (iii) hydrogen generation: as the source for the generation of green hydrogen for energy applications, (iv) carbon source: carbon sole source for bacterial growth, which effectively used for the generation of bioplastics and (v) polyesters: combine with suitable organic acids and forms polyesters for various materials applications. In materials point of view, crude glycerol's application in plasticising as well as polyesters formation receives an immense attention and is discussed in this section.

As the global demand increases for the development of biodegradable materials, starch-based plastics receives an immense attention. The challenge is their unusual inter and intra molecu‐ lar hydrogen bonds, which reduces their plastic performance [242]. This can be improved by incorporating plasticizers and manipulating processing conditions. Various plasticizers have been used on thermoplastic starch such as glycerol [243], glycol [244], sorbitol [245] and sugar [246]. Among them glycerol has been extensively used for the plasticization of starch-based materials. In addition to that, glycerol has also been used as an effective plasticizer in various othernaturalmaterialssuchascellulose[247],chitosan[248],gelatin[249],DDG[250]andprotein [233]. When these materials are plasticised with glycerol, their elasticity and toughness have been increased significantly with decreased brittleness. Numerous literatures are available for theglycerolplasticizednaturalproductsandmostoftheresearchershavepracticedpureglycerol as the precursor [233, 247-251]. Increasing trend of crude glycerol as plasticizer can be found in the literature for the development of various types of biomaterials [252-259].

Glycerol can be used to create polymeric materials by exploring their polyfunctionalreactivity and the obtained polymers can have various applications as polyols substitutes, lubricant, raw materials to produce resins, polyesters and polyurethanes [260]. Among them, polyest‐ ers and polyurethanes receive more importance for their large volume biomaterial applica‐ tions. The glycerol can easily react with carboxylic organic acids and forms polyesters, which can be used for various materials applications [260-261]. Carnahan et al. [262] demonstrat‐ ed the synthesis of glycerol-based polyesters using succinic and adipic acids. Likewise, Tang et al. [263] synthesized the aliphatic polyesters from glycerol using sebacic acid with elastic properties. In both the cases they were using pure glycerol as a precursor and more publications are also available for fabrication of various other types of polyesters [264-265]. However, very few research works have been published based on the crude glycerol as feedstock for polyester synthesis. Brioude et al. [261] reported the fabrication of new polyester from crude glycerol and adipic acid through the bulk polymerization. They found that the newly developed crude glycerol-based polyester was amorphous in nature and has good mechanical and thermal stability. Similarly de Moura et al. [260] reported the polymeriza‐ tion between the glycerol and mono/bi-functional organic groups for the fabrication of new class of polyesters. They were able to synthesise two different classes of polymers with variable thermal stability. Their ultimate aim was to utilize these newly developed polyest‐ ers as matrix for the fabrication of natural fibre-reinforced composite materials. The obtained features (physicochemical) of these newly synthesised polyesters can also be used as modifiers for various types of thermosets (epoxy resins) as well as polyurethanes. Urea-formalde‐ hyde (UF) has been widely known as an excellent adhesive used in wood panel fabrica‐ tion. The challenge is to overcome their limited moisture resistance. The polyols made form glycerol can be used to enhance their moisture resistance properties. Recently, fungi-based biological transformation of crude glycerol in to various value-added products receives significant attention. Fungus exhibits more tolerance against the various impurities that exist in crude glycerol and found to be a suitable candidate for the biotransformations. Nicol et al. [266] reviewed the various research work on effective bioconversion of crude glycerol into many value added chemicals/materials employing fungus. They conclude that these techniques need to be further investigated for the extended applications. It is visible that glycerol will become as a high potential feedstock for various chemicals and tends to replace various existing petroleum derived products [267].

Lignin, the major coproduct of lignocellulosic ethanol, is being upgraded from its traditional utilization, i.e. burning, into various value-added commercial products such as polymer

Coproducts of Biofuel Industries in Value-Added Biomaterials Uses: A Move Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55382

521

The industrial applications of pure glycerol in different sections are well established. Conse‐ quently, crude glycerol coproduced in biodiesel industry has huge opportunities in biomate‐ rial applications including chemicals/monomers, plasticizer, hydrogen generation, carbon

Novel innovative research in utilizing biofuel coproducts for biomaterials applications (biopolymers and biocomposites) impends the value-added high-end uses in the automotive, packaging and other structural/durable sectors. This is expected to create a fundamental change in materials point of view by utilizing renewable resources as feedstocks. In addition to that, these biofuel coproducts also create opportunity for the fabrication of various nano‐

Authors are thankful to the, Ontario Research Fund, Research Excellence, Round-4 (ORF RE04) from the Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation (MEDI); Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs' (OMAFRA) New Directions and Alternative Renewable Fuels "Plus" Research Programs; OMAFRA-University of Guelph Bioeconomy-Industrial Uses Program; the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery grant individuals to M. Misra and A. K. Mohanty; NSERC Biomaterials and Chemicals Strategic Research Network; AUTO21-NCE (Canada's automotive R&D program); the Hannam Soybean Utilization Fund (HSUF) and the Grain Farmers of Ontario (GFO) fund for supporting research on various aspects of biobased materials, biofuel coproducts and bionanotechnology at the University of Guelph's Bioproducts Discovery and Development Centre. N. Zarrinbakhsh acknowledges highly qualified personnel (HQP)

S. Vivekanandhan1,2, N. Zarrinbakhsh1,2, M. Misra1,2 and A. K. Mohanty1,2

Science Building, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada

1 Bioproducts Discovery and Development Centre, Department of Plant Agriculture, Crop

2 School of Engineering, Thornbrough Building, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G

blends/composites, adhesives, and carbon fibres.

source for bacterial growth and polyesters production.

structured materials for the high value applications.

**Acknowledgements**

scholarship from OMAFRA 2009.

**Author details**

2W1, Canada

#### **4. Conclusions**

Growing energy demand for transportation, necessity of reducing the dependency on fossil fuel and the emerging environmental concerns about greenhouse gas emission have enhanced the growth of biofuel industries enormously and created new policy mandates by many countries. This caused the generation of a huge amount of under-valued coproduces of different types including distillers' grains, bagasse, lignin, protein-rich meals and crude glycerol. In order to claim biofuel production as the sustainable technology of future, it is necessary to create value-addition to these coproducts. This also provides solution to the emerging issues on the environmental impact of the accumulation of these coproducts. Moreover, the technological development related to the value-added uses of biofuel copro‐ ducts in biomaterials applications, is expected to (i) create new ecofriendly products, (ii) strengthen the bioeconomy and (iii) generate more rural job opportunity.

Among these coproducts, dried distillers' grains with solubles (DDGS), from dry mill ethanol industry, and the protein-rich meals such as corn gluten meal (CGM) and soybean meal (SM), respectively from wet mill ethanol and biodiesel industries, are traditionally used for animal feed applications. However, recent researches show the huge potential of these coproducts for biomaterial applications. DDGS can be used as filler or even as reinforcing phase in polymeric biocomposites by integrating pre-treatment, compatibilization and proper processing techni‐ ques. Moreover, it can be converted into a thermoplastic by chemical modifications such as acetylation and cyanoethylation. Also, it can be used for producing bioadhesive or extraction of fiber, oil and protein to be used for biomaterial usages.

Due to their high content of protein, CGM and SM can be plasticized using several plasticizers. Such plasticized meals have been blended successfully with several thermoplastics or been reinforced with wood fiber to create biomaterials with balanced properties. Besides, fermen‐ tation of these proteineous coproducts can provide new opportunities for the development of biobased films for food packaging applications.

It has been a long time since bagasse, the sugarcane ethanol coproduct, has been used in thermoset-fiber composites for particleboard production. In addition to that, bagasse is recently considered as the reinforcing filler compounded with different thermoplastics. Also, it has been shown that bagasse can turn into a thermo-formable material through esterification. Lignin, the major coproduct of lignocellulosic ethanol, is being upgraded from its traditional utilization, i.e. burning, into various value-added commercial products such as polymer blends/composites, adhesives, and carbon fibres.

The industrial applications of pure glycerol in different sections are well established. Conse‐ quently, crude glycerol coproduced in biodiesel industry has huge opportunities in biomate‐ rial applications including chemicals/monomers, plasticizer, hydrogen generation, carbon source for bacterial growth and polyesters production.

Novel innovative research in utilizing biofuel coproducts for biomaterials applications (biopolymers and biocomposites) impends the value-added high-end uses in the automotive, packaging and other structural/durable sectors. This is expected to create a fundamental change in materials point of view by utilizing renewable resources as feedstocks. In addition to that, these biofuel coproducts also create opportunity for the fabrication of various nano‐ structured materials for the high value applications.

### **Acknowledgements**

Authors are thankful to the, Ontario Research Fund, Research Excellence, Round-4 (ORF RE04) from the Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation (MEDI); Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs' (OMAFRA) New Directions and Alternative Renewable Fuels "Plus" Research Programs; OMAFRA-University of Guelph Bioeconomy-Industrial Uses Program; the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery grant individuals to M. Misra and A. K. Mohanty; NSERC Biomaterials and Chemicals Strategic Research Network; AUTO21-NCE (Canada's automotive R&D program); the Hannam Soybean Utilization Fund (HSUF) and the Grain Farmers of Ontario (GFO) fund for supporting research on various aspects of biobased materials, biofuel coproducts and bionanotechnology at the University of Guelph's Bioproducts Discovery and Development Centre. N. Zarrinbakhsh acknowledges highly qualified personnel (HQP) scholarship from OMAFRA 2009.

### **Author details**

S. Vivekanandhan1,2, N. Zarrinbakhsh1,2, M. Misra1,2 and A. K. Mohanty1,2

1 Bioproducts Discovery and Development Centre, Department of Plant Agriculture, Crop Science Building, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada

2 School of Engineering, Thornbrough Building, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada

#### **References**

[1] 2012 The Outlook for Energy: A View to 2040 – Highlights. http://www.exxonmobil. com /corporate/files/news\_pub\_eo2012\_highlights.pdf (Accessed on 30th July 2012).

[15] Lynd LR, Laser MS, Bransby D, Dale BE, Davison B, Hamilton R, et al. How Biotech

Coproducts of Biofuel Industries in Value-Added Biomaterials Uses: A Move Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55382

523

[16] Paulson ND, Ginder RG. The Growth and Direction of the Biodiesel Industry in the United States: Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State Universi‐

[17] Fernando S, Adhikari S, Chandrapal C, Murali N. Biorefineries: Current Status, Chal‐

[18] OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2011, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and

[19] OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2011, Development of the World Ethanol Market. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932426467). Organisation for Economic Co-operation

[20] OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2011, Evolution of Global Ethanol Production by Feedstocks Used (http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932426562). Organisation for Econom‐

[21] OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2011, Development of the World Biodiesel Market (http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932426486), Organisation for Economic Co-operation

[22] OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2011, Evolution of Global Biodiesel Production by Feedstocks Used (http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932426581), Organisation for Econom‐

[23] Rosentrater KA. Ethanol processing co-products: economics, impacts, sustainability. In: Eaglesham A, Hardy RWF, editors. Agricultural biofuels: technology, sustainabil‐ ity and profitability. Proceedings of the National Agricultural Biotechnology Coun‐ cil's 19th Annual Conference; 2007 May 22–24; Brookings (SD), USA. Ithaca (NY):

[24] RFA Renewable Fuels Association. Industry resources: co-products; Available from: http://www.ethanolrfa.org/pages/industry-resources-coproducts (Accessed on 1st

[25] Yu P, Nuez-Ortin WG. Relationship of Protein Molecular Structure to Metabolisable Proteins in Different Types of Dried Distillers Grains with Solubles: A Novel Ap‐

[26] Kim Y, Mosier NS, Hendrickson R, Ezeji T, Blaschek H, Dien B, et al. Composition of Corn Dry-Grind Ethanol by-Products: DDGS, Wet Cake, and Thin Stillage. Biore‐

National Agricultural Biotechnology Council; 2007. p. 105-26.

proach. British Journal of Nutrition 2010;104 1429-37.

source Technology 2008;99 5165-5176.

Can Transform Biofuels. Nature Biotechnology 2008;26 169-172.

lenges, and Future Direction. Energy & Fuels 2006;20 1727-1737.

Development; 2011. (DOI: 10.1787/agr\_outlook-2011-en).

ty; 2007.

and Development; 2011.

and Development; 2011.

October 2012).

ic Co-operation and Development; 2011.

ic Co-operation and Development; 2011.


[27] Dong FM, Rasco BA. The Neutral Detergent Fiber, Acid Detergent Fiber, Crude Fi‐ ber, and Lignin Contents of Distillers' Dried Grains with Solubles. Journal of Food Science 1987;52 403.

[39] Webster CD, Tidwell JH, Yancey DH. Evaluation of Distillers' Grains with Solubles as a Protein Source in Diets for Channel Catfish. Aquaculture 1991;96 179-190.

Coproducts of Biofuel Industries in Value-Added Biomaterials Uses: A Move Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55382

525

[40] Shelby RA, Lim C, Yildrim-Aksoy M, Klesius PH. Effect of Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles incorporated Diets on Growth, Immune Function and Disease Resist‐ ance in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis Niloticus L.). Aquaculture Research 2008;39

[41] Ayadi FY, Muthukumarappan K, Rosentrater KA, Brown ML. Twin-Screw Extrusion Processing of Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS)-Based Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) Feeds, ASABE Meeting Presentation, Pennsylvania, Paper

[42] Tidwell JH, Webster CD, Clark JA, D'Abramo LR. Evaluation of Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles as an Ingredient in Diets for Pond Culture of the Freshwater Prawn Macrobrachium Rosenbergii. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society

[43] Babcock BA, Hayes DJ, Lawrence JD. Using Distillers Grains in the U.S. And Interna‐ tional Livestock and Poultry Industries. USA: Midwest Agribusiness Trade Research

[44] Hoffman LA, Baker A. Market issues and prospects for U.S. distillers' grains supply, use, and price relationships. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agricul‐

[45] A Guide to Distiller's Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS), U.S. Grains Council, http://www.ethanolrfa.org/page/-/rfa-association-site/studies/2012\_DDGS\_Hand‐

[46] Tokgoz S, Elobeid A, Fabiosa J, Hayes DJ, Babcock BA, Yu T-H, et al. Emerging Bio‐ fuels: Outlook of Effects on U.S. Grain, Oilseed, and Livestock Markets. Iowa State

[47] Canadian Food Inspection Agency. Rg-6 Regulatory Guidance: Ethanol Distillers' Grains for Livestock Feed. Available Online at: http://www.inspection.gc.ca/animals/ feeds/regulatory-guidance/rg-6/eng/1329275341920/1329275491608. (Accessed on

[48] AllAboutFeed (2011) US DDGS exports reach record high in 2010. http://www.alla‐ boutfeed.net/news/us-ddgs-exports-reach-record-high-in-2010-5303.html. (Accessed

[49] Chevanan N, Muthukumarappan K, Rosentrater KA. Extrusion Studies of Aquacul‐ ture Feed Using Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles and Whey. Food and Biopro‐

ture, Economic Research Service; 2010 Dec. Outlook No.: FDS-10k-01.

University: Center for Agricultural and Rural Development; 2007.

book.pdf?nocdn=1 (Accessed on 2nd December 2012).

1351-1353.

1993;24 66-70.

30th July 2012).

on February 2012).

cess Technology 2009;2 177-185.

Number: 1008337 2010.

and Information Center; 2008.


[50] Rasco BA, Rubenthaler G, Borhan M, Dong FM. Baking Properties of Bread and Cookies Incorporating Distillers' or Brewer's Grain from Wheat or Barley. Journal of Food Science 1990;55 424-429.

[64] Christians NE. Preemergence Weed Control Using Corn Gluten Meal. US Patent

Coproducts of Biofuel Industries in Value-Added Biomaterials Uses: A Move Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55382

527

[65] Biopesticides registration action document, Corn Gluten Meal (PC Code 100137), US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Available online at:

[66] Anselmo Filho P, Badr O. Biomass Resources for Energy in North-Eastern Brazil. Ap‐

[67] Pandey A, Soccol CR, Nigam P, Soccol VT. Biotechnological Potential of Agro-Indus‐ trial Residues. I: Sugarcane Bagasse. Bioresource Technology 2000;74 69-80.

[68] Srinivasan VR, Han YW. Utilization of Bagasse. In: Hajny GJ, Reese ET, editors. Cel‐ lulases and Their Applications: American Chemical Society; 1969, 447-460.

[69] Mbohwa C, Fukuda S. Electricity from Bagasse in Zimbabwe. Biomass and Bioenergy

[70] van den Broek R, van den Burg T, van Wijk A, Turkenburg W. Electricity Generation from Eucalyptus and Bagasse by Sugar Mills in Nicaragua: A Comparison with Fuel Oil Electricity Generation on the Basis of Costs, Macro-Economic Impacts and Envi‐

[71] Scaramucci JA, Perin C, Pulino P, Bordoni OFJG, da Cunha MP, Cortez LAB. Energy from Sugarcane Bagasse under Electricity Rationing in Brazil: A Computable General

[72] Krüger H, Berndt W, Schwartzkopff U, Reitter FJ, Höpner T, Mühlig H-J. Production

[73] Shaikh AJ. Blending of Cotton Stalk Pulp with Bagasse Pulp for Paper Making. Bio‐

[74] Widyorini R, Xu J, Umemura K, Kawai S. Manufacture and Properties of Binderless Particleboard from Bagasse I: Effects of Raw Material Type, Storage Methods, and

[75] Zayed G, Abdel-Motaal H. Bio-Production of Compost with Low Ph and High Solu‐ ble Phosphorus from Sugar Cane Bagasse Enriched with Rock Phosphate. World

[76] Nigam P. Investigation of Some Factors Important for Solid-State Fermentation of Sugar Cane Bagasse for Animal Feed Production. Enzyme and Microbial Technology

[77] De Filippis P, Borgianni C, Paolucci M, Pochetti F. Gasification Process of Cuban

Bagasse in a Two-Stage Reactor. Biomass and Bioenergy 2004;27 247-252.

ronmental Emissions. Biomass and Bioenergy 2000;19 311-335.

of Paper Pulp from Sugar Mill Bagasse. US Patent 1981; US 4260452.

Manufacturing Process. Journal of Wood Science 2005;51 648-654.

Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2005;21 747-752.

Equilibrium Model. Energy Policy 2006;34 986-992.

http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/chem\_search/reg\_actions/registration/deci‐

sion\_PC-100137\_4-Mar-03.pdf. (Accessed: December 2012).

1994; RE34594.

2003;25 197-207.

plied Energy 2004;77 51-67.

logical Wastes 1990;31 37-43.

1990;12 808-811.


[78] Laser M, Schulman D, Allen SG, Lichwa J, Antal Jr MJ, Lynd LR. A Comparison of Liquid Hot Water and Steam Pretreatments of Sugar Cane Bagasse for Bioconversion to Ethanol. Bioresource Technology 2002;81 33-44.

[92] Sahoo S, Misra M, Mohanty AK. Enhanced Properties of Lignin-Based Biodegradable Polymer Composites Using Injection Moulding Process. Composites Part A: Applied

Coproducts of Biofuel Industries in Value-Added Biomaterials Uses: A Move Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55382

529

[93] Sahoo S, Misra M, Mohanty AK. Effect of Compatibilizer and Fillers on the Proper‐ ties of Injection Molded Lignin Based Hybrid Green Composites. Journal of Applied

[95] Suhas, Carrott PJM, Ribeiro Carrott MML. Lignin–from Natural Adsorbent to Acti‐

[97] United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. World Protein Meal Production. 2012. http://www.ers.usda.gov/dataproducts/oil-crops-year‐

[99] United States National Biodiesel Board. US Biodiesel Production, http://www.biodie‐ sel.org/production/production-statistics. (Accesed on 1st December 2012).

[100] Lang X, Dalai AK, Bakhshi NN, Reaney MJ, Hertz PB. Preparation and Characteriza‐ tion of Bio-Diesels from Various Bio-Oils. Bioresource Technology 2001;80 53-62.

[101] Sarin R, Sharma M, Sinharay S, Malhotra RK. Jatropha–Palm Biodiesel Blends: An

[102] Meher LC, Kulkarni MG, Dalai AK, Naik SN. Transesterification of Karanja (Ponga‐ mia Pinnata) Oil by Solid Basic Catalysts. European Journal of Lipid Science and

[103] Pramanik K. Properties and Use of Jatropha Curcas Oil and Diesel Fuel Blends in

[104] Gerpen JV. Biodiesel Processing and Production. Fuel Processing Technology 2005;86

[105] Thompson JC, He BB. Characterization of Crude Glycerol from Biodiesel Production from Multiple Feedstocks. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 2006;22 261-265.

[106] Meher LC, Vidya Sagar D, Naik SN. Technical Aspects of Biodiesel Production by Transesterification—a Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2006;10

[107] Pachauri N, He B. Value-Added Utilization of Crude Glycerol from Biodiesel Pro‐ duction: A Survey of Current Research Activities. ASABE Meeting Presentation, Ore‐

Compression Ignition Engine. Renewable Energy 2003;28 239-248.

[94] Hu TQ. Chemical Modification, Properties, and Usage of Lignin: Springer; 2002.

[96] Reisch MS. Getting the Steel Out. Chemical & Engineering News, 2011;89 10-14.

vated Carbon: A Review. Bioresource Technology 2007;98 2301-2312.

Science and Manufacturing 2011, 42 1710–1718.

Polymer Science 2012. DOI: 10.1002/APP.37667

book.aspx. (Accesed on 1st December 2012).

Optimum Mix for Asia. Fuel 2007;86 1365-1371.

Technology 2006;108 389-397.

gon, Paper Number: 066223 2006.

1097-1107.

248-268.

[98] Faostat. http://faostat.fao.Org. (Accesed on 1st December 2012).


[108] Mu Y, Teng H, Zhang D-J, Wang W, Xiu Z-L. Microbial Production of 1, 3-Propane‐ diol by Klebsiella Pneumoniae Using Crude Glycerol from Biodiesel Preparations. Bi‐ otechnology Letters 2006;28 1755-1759.

[122] Tatara RA, Rosentrater KA, Suraparaju S. Design Properties for Molded, Corn-Based DDGS-Filled Phenolic Resin. Industrial Crops and Products 2009;29 9-15.

Coproducts of Biofuel Industries in Value-Added Biomaterials Uses: A Move Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55382

531

[123] Cheesbrough V, Rosentrater KA, Visser J. Properties of Distillers Grains Composites: A Preliminary Investigation. Journal of Polymers and the Environment 2008;16 40-50.

[124] Li Y, Susan Sun X. Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Biocomposites from Poly(Lactic Acid) and DDGS. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2011;121 589-597.

[125] Zarrinbakhsh N, Mohanty AK, Misra M. Fundamental Studies on Water-Washing of the Corn Ethanol Coproduct (DDGS) and Its Characterization for Biocomposite Ap‐ plications. Biomass and Bioenergy 2013; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.

[126] Zarrinbakhsh N, Misra M, Mohanty AK. Biodegradable Green Composites from Dis‐ tiller's Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS) and Polyhydroxy(Butyrate-Co-Valerate) (PHBV)-Based Bioplastic. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 2011;296

[127] Muniyasamy S, Reddy MM, Misra M, Mohanty AK. Biodegradable Green Compo‐ sites from Bioethanol Co-Product and Poly(Butylene Adipate-Co-Terephatalate). In‐

[128] Saunders JA, Rosentrater KA. Properties of Solvent Extracted Low-Oil Corn Distillers

[129] Srinivasan R, Singh V, Belyea RL, Rausch KD, Moreau RA, Tumbleson ME. Econom‐ ics of Fiber Separation from Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS) Using

[130] Singh A. Bioadhesives from Distiller's Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS) and Stud‐ ies on Sustainability Issues of Corn Ethanol Industries. Master Thesis, Michigan State

[131] Mohanty AK, Wu Q, Singh A. Bioadhesive from Distillers' Dried Grains with Solu‐ bles (DDGS) and the Methods of Making Those. US Patent 2009; US 7618660 B2.

[132] Hu C, Reddy N, Luo Y, Yan K, Yang Y. Thermoplastics from Acetylated Zein-and-Oil-Free Corn Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles. Biomass and Bioenergy 2011;35

[133] Hu C, Reddy N, Yan K, Yang Y. Synthesis and Characterization of Highly Flexible Thermoplastic Films from Cyanoethylated Corn Distillers Dried Grains with Solu‐

[134] Yu F, Le Z, Chen P, Liu Y, Lin X, Ruan R. Atmospheric Pressure Liquefaction of Dried Distillers Grains (DDG) and Making Polyurethane Foams from Liquefied

bles. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2011;59 1723-1728.

DDG. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2008;148 235-243.

Dried Grains with Solubles. Biomass and Bioenergy 2009;33 1486-1490.

Sieving and Elutriation. Cereal Chemistry 2006;83 324-330.

dustrial Crops and Products 2013;43 812– 819.

2013.02.016.

1035-1045.

University; 2008.

884-892.


[135] Youngquist JA, Krzysik AM, English BW, Spelter HN, Chow P. Proceedings of 1996 symposium on The Use of Recycled Wood and Paper in Building Applications, Mad‐ ison, WI, Forest products society 1996; p 123–134.

[149] Patil YP, Gajre B, Dusane D, Chavan S, Mishra S. Effect of Maleic Anhydride Treat‐ ment on Steam and Water Absorption of Wood Polymer Composites Prepared from Wheat Straw, Cane Bagasse, and Teak Wood Sawdust Using Novolac as Matrix.

Coproducts of Biofuel Industries in Value-Added Biomaterials Uses: A Move Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55382

533

[150] Paiva JMF, Frollini E. Sugarcane Bagasse Reinforced Phenolic and Lignophenolic

[151] Salyer IO, Usmani AM. Utilization of Bagasse in New Composite Building Materials. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Product Research and Development 1982;21

[152] Stael GC, Tavares MIB, d'Almeida JRM. Evaluation of Sugar Cane Bagasse Waste as Reinforcement in Eva Matrix Composite Materials. Polymer-Plastics Technology and

[153] Stael GC, Tavares MIB, d'Almeida JRM. Impact Behavior of Sugarcane Bagasse

[154] Luz SM, Gonçalves AR, Del'Arco Jr AP. Mechanical Behavior and Microstructural Analysis of Sugarcane Bagasse Fibers Reinforced Polypropylene Composites. Com‐

[155] Mulinari DR, Voorwald HJC, Cioffi MOH, da Silva MLCP, Luz SM. Preparation and Properties of Hdpe/Sugarcane Bagasse Cellulose Composites Obtained for Thermo‐

[156] Chen Y, Ishikawa Y, Maekawa T, Zhang Z. Preparation of Acetylated Starch/Bagasse Fiber Composites by Extrusion. Transactions of the ASAE 2006;49 85-90.

[157] Chen Y, Zhang Z, Ishikawa Y, Maekawa T. Production of Starch-Based Biodegrada‐ ble Plastics Reinforced with Bagasse Fiber. Journal of the Society of Agricultural

[158] Hassan ML, Rowell RM, Fadl NA, Yacoub SF, Christainsen AW. Thermoplasticiza‐ tion of Bagasse. I. Preparation and Characterization of Esterified Bagasse Fibers.

[159] Hassan ML, Rowell RM, Fadl NA, Yacoub SF, Christainsen AW. Thermoplasticiza‐ tion of Bagasse. II. Dimensional Stability and Mechanical Properties of Esterified

[160] Wang J, Manley RSJ, Feldman D. Synthetic Polymer-Lignin Copolymers and Blends.

[161] Lora JH, Glasser WG. Recent Industrial Applications of Lignin: A Sustainable Alter‐ native to Nonrenewable Materials. Journal of Polymers and the Environment 2002;10

Bagasse Composite. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2000;76 575-586.

posites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 2007;38 1455-1461.

Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2000;77 2963-2967.

17-23.

Engineering 2001;40 217-223.

Structures 2002;32 177-184.

39-48.

Composites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2002;83 880-888.

Waste–EVA Composites. Polymer Testing 2001;20 869-872.

kinetic Mixer. Carbohydrate Polymers 2009;75 317-321.

Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2000;76 561-574.

Progress in Polymer Science (UK) 1992;17 611-646.


[162] Thielemans W, Can E, Morye SS, Wool RP. Novel Applications of Lignin in Compo‐ site Materials. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2002;83 323-331.

[177] Camargo FA, Innocentini-Mei LH, Lemes AP, Moraes SG, Durán N. Processing and Characterization of Composites of Poly (3-Hydroxybutyrate-Co-Hydroxyvalerate) and Lignin from Sugar Cane Bagasse. Journal of Composite Materials 2012;46

Coproducts of Biofuel Industries in Value-Added Biomaterials Uses: A Move Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55382

535

[178] Mousavioun P, Doherty WOS, George G. Thermal Stability and Miscibility of Poly (Hydroxybutyrate) and Soda Lignin Blends. Industrial Crops and Products 2010;32

[179] Vengal JC, Srikumar M. Processing and Study of Novel Lignin-Starch and Lignin-Gelatin Biodegradable Polymeric Films. Trends in Biomaterials and Artificial Organs

[180] Réti C, Casetta M, Duquesne S, Bourbigot S, Delobel R. Flammability Properties of Intumescent PLA Including Starch and Lignin. Polymers for Advanced Technologies

[181] El Mansouri NE, Yuan Q, Huang F. Characterization of Alkaline Lignins for Use in Phenol-Formaldehyde and Epoxy Resins. BioResources 2011;6 2647-2662.

[182] Peng W, Riedl B. The Chemorheology of Phenol-Formaldehyde Thermoset Resin and

[183] Guigo N, Mija A, Vincent L, Sbirrazzuoli N. Eco-Friendly Composite Resins Based on Renewable Biomass Resources: Polyfurfuryl Alcohol/Lignin Thermosets. European

[184] Thielemans W, Wool RP. Butyrated Kraft Lignin as Compatibilizing Agent for Natu‐ ral Fiber Reinforced Thermoset Composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and

[185] Nonaka Y, Tomita B, Hatano Y. Synthesis of Lignin/Epoxy Resins in Aqueous Sys‐ tems and Their Properties. Holzforschung-International Journal of the Biology,

[186] Kumaran MG, De SK. Utilization of Lignins in Rubber Compounding. Journal of Ap‐

[187] Wang H, Easteal AJ, Edmonds N. Prevulcanized Natural Rubber Latex/Modified Lig‐ nin Dispersion for Water Vapour Barrier Coatings on Paperboard Packaging. Ad‐

[188] Tibenham FJ, Grace NS. Compounding Natural Rubber with Lignin and Humic

[189] Nakamura K, Hatakeyama T, Hatakeyama H. Thermal Properties of Solvolysis Lig‐ nin Derived Polyurethanes. Polymers for Advanced Technologies 1992;3 151-155.

Chemistry, Physics and Technology of Wood 2009;51 183-187.

Acid. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry 1954;46 824-828.

Mixtures of the Resin with Lignin Fillers. Polymer 1994;35 1280-1286.

417-425.

656-661.

2005;18 237-241.

2008;19 628-635.

Polymer Journal 2010;46 1016-1023.

Manufacturing 2004;35 327-338.

plied Polymer Science 1978;22 1885-1893.

vanced Materials Research 2008;47-50 93-96.


[190] Nakamura K, Mörck R, Reimann A, Kringstad KP, Hatakeyama H. Mechanical Prop‐ erties of Solvolysis Lignin Derived Polyurethanes. Polymers for Advanced Technolo‐ gies 1991;2 41-47.

[202] Khan MA, Ashraf SM, Malhotra VP. Development and Characterization of a Wood Adhesive Using Bagasse Lignin. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives

Coproducts of Biofuel Industries in Value-Added Biomaterials Uses: A Move Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55382

537

[203] Allen MJ, Tung VC, Kaner RB. Honeycomb Carbon: A Review of Graphene. Chemi‐

[204] Niyogi S, Hamon MA, Hu H, Zhao B, Bhowmik P, Sen R, et al. Chemistry of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Accounts of Chemical Research 2002;35 1105-1113. [205] Kim C, Yang KS. Electrochemical Properties of Carbon Nanofiber Web as an Elec‐ trode for Supercapacitor Prepared by Electrospinning. Applied Physics Letters

[206] Kim H, Abdala AA, Macosko CW. Graphene/Polymer Nanocomposites. Macromole‐

[207] White RJ, Tauer K, Antonietti M, Titirici M-M. Functional Hollow Carbon Nano‐ spheres by Latex Templating. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2010, 132,

[208] Kang X, Wang J, Wu H, Liu J, Aksay IA, Lin Y. A Graphene-Based Electrochemical

[209] Suriani AB, Azira AA, Nik SF, Md Nor R, Rusop M. Synthesis of Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotubes Using Natural Palm Oil as Carbon Precursor. Materials Letters

[210] Sharon M, Sharon M. Carbon Nanomaterials and Their Synthesis from Plant Derived Precursors. Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic, Metal-Organic and Nano-Metal

[211] Sharon M, Soga T, Afre R, Sathiyamoorthy D, Dasgupta K, Bhardwaj S, et al. Hydro‐ gen Storage by Carbon Materials Synthesized from Oil Seeds and Fibrous Plant Ma‐

[212] Yu SH, Cui XJ, Li LL, Li K, Yu B, Antonietti M, et al. From Starch to Metal/Carbon Hybrid Nanostructures: Hydrothermal Metal Catalyzed Carbonization. Advanced

[213] Hayashi J, Kazehaya A, Muroyama K, Watkinson AP. Preparation of Activated Car‐

[214] Kubo S, Kadla JF. Lignin-Based Carbon Fibers: Effect of Synthetic Polymer Blending on Fiber Properties. Journal of Polymers and the Environment 2005;13 97-105. [215] Babel K, Jurewicz K. KOH Activated Lignin Based Nanostructured Carbon Exhibit‐

terials. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2007;32 4238-4249.

bon from Lignin by Chemical Activation. Carbon 2000;38 1873-1878.

ing High Hydrogen Electrosorption. Carbon 2008;46 1948-1956.

Sensor for Sensitive Detection of Paracetamol. Talanta 2010;81 754-759.

2004;24 485-493.

2003;83 1216-1218.

17360–17363.

2009;63 2704-2706.

Chemistry 2006;36 265-279.

Materials 2004;16 1636-1640.

cules 2010; 43 6515–6530.

cal Reviews 2010;110 132.


[216] Gonugunta P. Synthesis and Characterization of Biobased Carbon Nanoparticles from Lignin. Thesis, Master of Applied Science, University of Guelph, 2012.

[230] Corradini E, Marconcini JM, Agnelli JAM, Mattoso LHC. Thermoplastic Blends of Corn Gluten Meal/Starch (CGM/Starch) and Corn Gluten Meal/Polyvinyl Alcohol and Corn Gluten Meal/Poly (Hydroxybutyrate-Co-Hydroxyvalerate) (CGM/PHB-V).

Coproducts of Biofuel Industries in Value-Added Biomaterials Uses: A Move Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55382

539

[231] Aithani D, Mohanty AK. Value-Added New Materials from Byproduct of Corn Based Ethanol Industries: Blends of Plasticized Corn Gluten Meal and Poly(ε-Capro‐

[232] Wu Q, Sakabe H, Isobe S. Processing and Properties of Low Cost Corn Gluten Meal/ Wood Fiber Composite. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2003;42

[233] Samarasinghe S, Easteal AJ, Edmonds NR. Biodegradable Plastic Composites from

[234] Beg MDH, Pickering KL, Weal SJ. Corn Gluten Meal as a Biodegradable Matrix Ma‐ terial in Wood Fibre Reinforced Composites. Materials Science and Engineering: A

[235] Diebel W, Reddy MM, Misra M, Mohanty A. Material Property Characterization of Co-Products from Biofuel Industries: Potential Uses in Value-Added Biocomposites.

[236] Reddy MM, Mohanty AK, Misra M. Biodegradable Blends from Plasticized Soy Meal, Polycaprolactone, and Poly (Butylene Succinate). Macromolecular Materials

[237] Reddy MM, Mohanty AK, Misra M. Optimization of Tensile Properties Thermoplas‐ tic Blends from Soy and Biodegradable Polyesters: Taguchi Design of Experiments

[238] Wu Q, Selke S, Mohanty AK. Processing and Properties of Biobased Blends from Soy Meal and Natural Rubber. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 2007;292

[239] Mohanty AK, Wu Q, Selke S. "Green" Materials from Soy Meal and Natural Rubber

[240] Kim H-W, Kim K-M, Ko E-J, Lee S-K, Ha S-D, Song K-B, et al. Development of Anti‐ microbial Edible Film from Defatted Soybean Meal Fermented by Bacillus Subtilis.

[241] Kim H-W, Ko E-J, Ha S-D, Song K-B, Park S-K, Chung D-H, et al. Physical, Mechani‐ cal, and Antimicrobial Properties of Edible Film Produced from Defatted Soybean Meal Fermented by Bacillus Subtilis. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology

Corn Gluten Meal. Polymer International 2008;57 359-364.

Approach. Journal of Materials Science 2012; 37 2591-2599.

Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2004;14 1303-1309.

lactone). Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2006;45 6147-6152.

Carbohydrate Polymers 2011;83 959-965.

Biomass and Bioenergy, 2012; 37 88–96.

and Engineering 2012; 297 455–463.

Blends. US Patents 2010; US 7649036 B2.

6765-6773.

2005;412 7-11.

1149-1157.

2005;15 815-822.


[242] Jiugao Y, Ning W, Xiaofei M. The Effects of Citric Acid on the Properties of Thermo‐ plastic Starch Plasticized by Glycerol. Starch Stärke 2005;57 494-504.

lastic Properties of Biodegradable Strands and Films. Materials Science and Engi‐

Coproducts of Biofuel Industries in Value-Added Biomaterials Uses: A Move Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55382

541

[256] Grazhulevichene V, Augulis L, Gumbite M, Makarevichene V. Biodegradable Com‐ posites of Polyvinyl Alcohol and Coproducts of Diesel Biofuel Production. Russian

[257] Stevens ES, Ashby RD, Solaiman DKY. Gelatin Plasticized with a Biodiesel Copro‐

[258] Bardi MAG, Machado LDB, Guedes CGF, Rosa DS. Influence of Processing on Prop‐ erties of Aditived Polypropylene, Starch Plasticized with Glycerol from Biodiesel and Their Blends. http://www.ipen.br/biblioteca/cd/cbpol/2009/PDF/1450.pdf. (Accessed

[259] Singh M, Milano J, Stevens ES, Ashby RD, Solaiman DKY. Gelatin Films Plasticized with a Simulated Biodiesel Coproduct Stream. eXPRESS Polymer Letters; 2009; 3

[260] de Moura CVR, Nunes ASL, Neto JMM, Neres HLS, de Carvalho LMG, de Moura EM. Synthesis and Characterization of Polyesters from Glycerol by-Product of Bio‐ diesel Production. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society 2012;23 1226-1231. [261] Brioude MM, Guimarães DH, Fiúza RP, Prado LASA, Boaventura JS, José NM. Syn‐ thesis and Characterization of Aliphatic Polyesters from Glycerol, by-Product of Bio‐

[262] Carnahan MA, Grinstaff MW. Synthesis of Generational Polyester Dendrimers De‐ rived from Glycerol and Succinic or Adipic Acid. Macromolecules 2006;39 609-616.

[263] Tang J, Zhang Z, Song Z, Chen L, Hou X, Yao K. Synthesis and Characterization of Elastic Aliphatic Polyesters from Sebacic Acid, Glycol and Glycerol. European Poly‐

[264] Holser RA, Willett JL, Vaughn SF. Thermal and Physical Characterization of Glycerol

[265] Stumbé J-F, Bruchmann B. Hyperbranched Polyesters Based on Adipic Acid and

[266] Nicol RW, Marchand K, Lubitz WD. Bioconversion of Crude Glycerol by Fungi. Ap‐

[267] Johnson DT, Taconi KA. The Glycerin Glut: Options for the Value Added Conversion of Crude Glycerol Resulting from Biodiesel Production. Environmental Progress

Polyesters. Journal of Biobased Materials and Bioenergy 2008;2 94-96.

Glycerol. Macromolecular Rapid Communications 2004;25 921-924.

plied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2012; 93 1865-1875.

diesel Production, and Adipic Acid. Materials Research 2007;10 335-339.

duct Stream. Journal of Biobased Materials and Bioenergy 2009;3 57-61.

neering: C 2012; 32 2220–2222.

on 3rd December 2012)

mer Journal 2006;42 3360-3366.

2007;26 338-348.

201–206.

Journal of Applied Chemistry 2011;84 719-723.


lastic Properties of Biodegradable Strands and Films. Materials Science and Engi‐ neering: C 2012; 32 2220–2222.


### *Edited by Zhen Fang*

This book offers reviews of state-of-the-art conversion techniques for biofuels. It focuses on the latest development for the production of liquid and gaseous biofuels that should be of interest to the chemical scientists and technologists.

Photo by Shutterstock

Liquid, Gaseous and Solid Biofuels - Conversion Techniques

Liquid, Gaseous and

Solid Biofuels

Conversion Techniques