**Arsenic in Groundwater: A Summary of Sources and the Biogeochemical and Hydrogeologic Factors Affecting Arsenic Occurrence and Mobility**

Julia L. Barringer and Pamela A. Reilly

Additional information is available at the end of the chapter

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55354

## **1. Introduction**

## **1.1. World-wide occurrences of arsenic–contaminated groundwater – Forms and toxicity**

Arsenic (As) is a metalloid element (atomic number 33) with one naturally occurring isotope of atomic mass 75, and four oxidation states (-3, 0, +3, and +5) (Smedley and Kinniburgh, 2002). In the aqueous environment, the +3 and +5 oxidation states are most prevalent, as the oxyanions arsenite (H3AsO3 or H2AsO3 at pH ~9-11) and arsenate (H2AsO4 - and HAsO4 2- at pH ~4-10) (Smedley and Kinniburgh, 2002). In soils, arsine gases (containing As3-) may be gener‐ ated by fungi and other organisms (Woolson, 1977).

The different forms of As have different toxicities, with arsine gas being the most toxic form. Of the inorganic oxyanions, arsenite is considered more toxic than arsenate, and the organic (methylated) arsenic forms are considered least toxic (for a detailed discussion of toxicity issues, the reader is referred to Mandal and Suzuki (2002)). Arsenic is a global health concern due to its toxicity and the fact that it occurs at unhealthful levels in water supplies, particularly groundwater, in more than 70 countries (Ravenscroft et al., 2009) on six continents.

## **1.2. Health effects and standards**

Despite its use in medicines for nearly 2,500 years (Mandal and Suzuki, 2002; Cullen, 2008) As has long been recognized as a toxic and often lethal substance. Chronic exposure to As can cause harm to the human cardiovascular, dermal, gastrointestinal, hepatic, neurologi‐ cal, pulmonary, renal and respiratory systems (ATSDR, 2000) and reproductive system (Mandal and Suzuki, 2002). Research on health effects is summarized and discussed by

Mandal and Suzuki (2002) and Ng et al. (2003). A compilation of their reviews is found in Table 1.

(Smedley, 2008) and the number of countries in which groundwater is found to be contami‐ nated by As has increased substantially over the past 80 years. This chapter presents a brief overview of the history of groundwater As contamination and summarizes information about the sources, occurrence and mobility of As in groundwater. A compilation of worldwide hazardous waste sites is beyond the scope of the chapter, and only a few examples will be presented. Information on As occurrence reported in previous important summaries and discussions (e.g., Bhattacharya et al., (eds) 2007; Smedley and Kinniburgh, 2002; Welch and Stollenwerk, (eds. ) 2003) is presented in addition to recent findings from the past decade.

Arsenic in Groundwater: A Summary of Sources and the Biogeochemical and Hydrogeologic Factors Affecting…

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55354

85

Currently (2012), As contamination of groundwater resources has been identified in many parts of the world, although recognition of the widespread nature of the problem has been advanced only relatively recently. Despite localized inputs of As from human activities, much of the contamination of groundwater with As is shown to arise from geogenic sources and affected groundwater has been found in countries on nearly every continent or major land

**Figure 1.** Countries, states, provinces, or areas mentioned in this chapter in which arsenic concentrations in ground‐ water, including geothermal waters and water contaminated by mining, exceed 10 micrograms per liter (the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended standard (WHO, 1993)). Arsenic concentrations at most locations shown exceed 50 micrograms per liter. Locations of dots are spatially generalized and do not indicate precise locations of

arsenic-contaminated waters.

mass. To date, none has been reported for Greenland, and Antarctica (Figure 1).

**1.3. Chronology of discoveries of geogenic arsenic contamination**


**Table 1.** Summary of effects of chronic arsenic exposure on human health. (Data from Mandal and Suzuki, 2002, and Ng et al., 2003, and references therein.)

The carcinogenic properties of As were suspected as early as the late 19th Century (Smith et al., 2002). Arsenic is now widely recognized and regulated as a carcinogen (ATSDR, 2000; National Research Council, 1999; USEPA, 2001). Consequently, the occurrence of As in waters at concentrations that exceed existing standards for drinking-water supplies has become of increasing concern, leading to recommended or legislated decreases in concentrations of As in drinking water in many countries. In 1993, the World Health Organization provisionally recommended a decrease from 50 μg/L to 10 μg/L (WHO, 1993). The United States (USA) federal standard, the European Union (EU) Drinking Water Directive (98/83/EC), the New Zealand Drinking Water Standard, the Japanese standard, and recent laws in many Latin American countries (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Panama) now place 10 μg/L as the drinking water maximum contaminant level (MCL) (Bundschuh et al., 2012; Robinson et al., 2004; Rowland et al., 2011; Smedley and Kinniburgh, 2002; USEPA, 2001). Mexico has adopted 25 μg/L as a standard (Bundschuh et al., 2012), whereas Australia has instituted a standard of 7 μg/L (NHMRC, 1996) and the State of New Jersey in the USA adopted an As MCL of 5 μg/L in 2006 (NJDEP, 2009). Some developing countries (Bangladesh, for example) have maintained the earlier 50 μg/L MCL standard (Ng et al., 2003). Many instances of As concentrations in groundwater that far exceed standards have been reported throughout much of the world (Smedley, 2008) and the number of countries in which groundwater is found to be contami‐ nated by As has increased substantially over the past 80 years. This chapter presents a brief overview of the history of groundwater As contamination and summarizes information about the sources, occurrence and mobility of As in groundwater. A compilation of worldwide hazardous waste sites is beyond the scope of the chapter, and only a few examples will be presented. Information on As occurrence reported in previous important summaries and discussions (e.g., Bhattacharya et al., (eds) 2007; Smedley and Kinniburgh, 2002; Welch and Stollenwerk, (eds. ) 2003) is presented in addition to recent findings from the past decade.

#### **1.3. Chronology of discoveries of geogenic arsenic contamination**

Mandal and Suzuki (2002) and Ng et al. (2003). A compilation of their reviews is found in

Cardiovascular Heart attack, cardiac arrhythmias, thickening of blood vessels, loss of circulation leading to

Dermal Hyperpigmentation, abnormal skin thickening, narrowing of small arteries leading to numbness (Raynaud's Disease), squamous and basal-cell cancer

Neurological Brain malfunction, hallucinations, memory loss, seizures, coma, peripheral neuropathy

Respiratory Laryngitis, tracheal bronchitis, rhinitis, pharyngitis, shortness of breath, perforation of nasal

Renal Hematuria, proteinuria, shock, dehydration, cortical necrosis, cancer of kidneys and bladder Reproductive Spontaneous abortions, still-births, congenital malformations of fetus, low birth weight

**Table 1.** Summary of effects of chronic arsenic exposure on human health. (Data from Mandal and Suzuki, 2002, and

The carcinogenic properties of As were suspected as early as the late 19th Century (Smith et al., 2002). Arsenic is now widely recognized and regulated as a carcinogen (ATSDR, 2000; National Research Council, 1999; USEPA, 2001). Consequently, the occurrence of As in waters at concentrations that exceed existing standards for drinking-water supplies has become of increasing concern, leading to recommended or legislated decreases in concentrations of As in drinking water in many countries. In 1993, the World Health Organization provisionally recommended a decrease from 50 μg/L to 10 μg/L (WHO, 1993). The United States (USA) federal standard, the European Union (EU) Drinking Water Directive (98/83/EC), the New Zealand Drinking Water Standard, the Japanese standard, and recent laws in many Latin American countries (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Panama) now place 10 μg/L as the drinking water maximum contaminant level (MCL) (Bundschuh et al., 2012; Robinson et al., 2004; Rowland et al., 2011; Smedley and Kinniburgh, 2002; USEPA, 2001). Mexico has adopted 25 μg/L as a standard (Bundschuh et al., 2012), whereas Australia has instituted a standard of 7 μg/L (NHMRC, 1996) and the State of New Jersey in the USA adopted an As MCL of 5 μg/L in 2006 (NJDEP, 2009). Some developing countries (Bangladesh, for example) have maintained the earlier 50 μg/L MCL standard (Ng et al., 2003). Many instances of As concentrations in groundwater that far exceed standards have been reported throughout much of the world

gangrene of extremities, hypertension

84 Current Perspectives in Contaminant Hydrology and Water Resources Sustainability

Hepatic Cirrhosis, fatty degeneration, abnormal cell growth (neoplasia)

Table 1.

**System Health effects**

Gastrointestinal Heartburn, nausea, abdominal pain

septum

Ng et al., 2003, and references therein.)

Hematological Anemia, low white-blood-cell count (leucopenia)

Pulmonary Chronic cough, restrictive lung disease, cancer

Currently (2012), As contamination of groundwater resources has been identified in many parts of the world, although recognition of the widespread nature of the problem has been advanced only relatively recently. Despite localized inputs of As from human activities, much of the contamination of groundwater with As is shown to arise from geogenic sources and affected groundwater has been found in countries on nearly every continent or major land mass. To date, none has been reported for Greenland, and Antarctica (Figure 1).

**Figure 1.** Countries, states, provinces, or areas mentioned in this chapter in which arsenic concentrations in ground‐ water, including geothermal waters and water contaminated by mining, exceed 10 micrograms per liter (the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended standard (WHO, 1993)). Arsenic concentrations at most locations shown exceed 50 micrograms per liter. Locations of dots are spatially generalized and do not indicate precise locations of arsenic-contaminated waters.

The discoveries of As contamination of groundwater have occurred over a span of nearly 100 years, the most recent within the last decade. Observations of health problems first led to the realization that As was being inadvertently ingested. Arsenic poisoning in humans in Argen‐ tina was recognized as early as 1913, and attributed to the drinking of groundwater (Bund‐ schuh et al., 2012, and reference therein). A possible connection between skin cancers and drinking water was recognized in Taiwan during the 1930s (Chen et al., 1994). In the 1940s, As contamination of well water in the Pannonian Basin in Romania and adjacent Hungary was discovered (Gurzau and Pop, 2012; Mukherjee et al., 2006). Recognition of similar occurrences in other European countries such as southwestern England, Germany, Greece, and Spain followed, and groundwaters with As concentrations that exceed standards are now observed in more than 70 countries worldwide (Nordstrom, 2002; Ravenscroft et al., 2009).

Health problems attributed to As exposure were first noted within a district in a province of Thailand in 1987. Sampling indicated As at concentrations in groundwater that exceeded 5,000 μg/L with about 15,000 people thought to have been exposed (Nordstrom, 2002; Smedley, 2008). Sampling of well waters during the 1990s and later in northern parts of China, including Inner Mongolia, have shown groundwater As concentrations that range widely, from <1 to about 2,400 μg/L (Nordstrom, 2002; Smedley, 2008). In Japan, As levels were found to be high in geothermal waters and springs as early as the 1950s (Noguchi and Nakagawa, 1969), and As contamination of groundwater was noted in 1994. Exposure to As from industrial sources was noted as early as the 1950s (Mukherjee et al., 2006). In 1981 in Iran, chronic arsenic poisoning was noticed and subsequent well-water sampling revealed concentrations exceed‐

Arsenic in Groundwater: A Summary of Sources and the Biogeochemical and Hydrogeologic Factors Affecting…

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55354

87

Arsenic contamination of both surface water and groundwater also is found in many Latin American countries, but the full extent of the problem is not yet clear (Bundschuh et al., 2012). Groundwater concentrations in Argentina are reported to range as high as about 15,000 μg/L (Bundschuh et al., and references therein). High levels of As were found in waters in Chile and Mexico in the 1950s and 60s (Bundschuh et al., 2012; Rosas et al., 1999). In northern Chile, As concentrations in groundwater ranged from 20 to 5,000 μg/L, and there is strong evidence from hair, skin, bones and funerary preparations (clay, paint) of Chinchor‐ ro culture mummies that the population there was exposed to high levels of As more than 7,000 years ago (Bundschuh et al., 2012), and, presumably, has been ever since. Concentra‐ tions of As in groundwater in Mexico generally are not reported to reach the higher levels found in Argentina except for a geothermal area in Michoacán, where 24,000 μg/L are reported (Bundschuh et al., 2012, and references therein). In mined areas of Mexico, leaching from tailings piles have contributed As to groundwater (Carillo-Chávez et al., 2000; Méndez and Armienta, 2003). Arsenic-contaminated surface water and groundwater subsequently was recognized in parts of Peru in the 1970s (Bundschuh et al., 2010). Although As contamination of waters in Argentina, Chile, Mexico and Peru was known from the early and mid-20th century, surface water and (or) groundwaters (and geothermal waters) containing geogenic As at contaminant levels were discovered in alluvial, metasedimenta‐ ry, volcanic, and metavolcanic aquifers only since the late 1990s in Bolivia, Brazil, Colum‐ bia, Cuba, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Uruguay

In Africa, the occurrence of high concentrations of As in groundwater from wells in a village in Burkina Faso was first noticed in the 1970s, but more extensive sampling did not occur until several decades later (Smedley, 2008). Arsenic-related skin diseases were noted in the region, and, although many wells yielded water with As concentrations < 10 μg/L, concentrations as high as 1,600 μg/L were found (Smedley et al., 2007). Effects of mining on soils and waters in other African countries (Ghana and Zambia) have been studied only recently (e.g., Bowell et al., 1994; Nakayama et al., 2011; Smedley and Kinniburgh (2002); As contamination of ground‐ water has been reported in Ghana. Arsenic contamination of well water was discovered during

the drought in Perth, Australia in 2002 (Appleyard et al., 2006).

ing 1,000 μg/L (Mukherjee et al., 2006).

(Bundschuh et al., 2012).

During the mid-20th century, instances of As contamination of groundwater were reported for the western USA and Alaska (Welch et al., 1988; Mueller et al., 2001), but were not fully recognized in the states of Oklahoma, Texas, and Arkansas and in the Midwest and North‐ eastern parts of the country until the 1980s (Ayotte et al., 2003; Ayotte et al., 1999; Haque et al., 2008; Peters, 2008; Peters and Burkert, 2007; Scanlon et al., 2009; Sharif et al., 2008; Welch et al., 2000 and references therein). Most recently, groundwater containing As in excess of USA Federal and State MCLs was found in parts of the Atlantic Coastal Plain (Barringer et al., 2010; Drummond and Bolton, 2010; Haque et al., 2008; Mumford et al., 2012; Pearcy et al., 2011). In Canada, As-contaminated groundwaters in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia were noted in the 1970s (Bottomley, 1984), and instances in western Canada were noted in the 1960s and 1980s (Wang and Mulligan, 2006a).

In West Bengal, India, cases of arsenic poisoning were first noted in 1983-84, according to Rahman et al. (2005), although Mandal and Suzuki place 1978 as the time when arsenicosis (skin lesions) and groundwater contamination were first noticed in West Bengal. Since the 1980s, extensive sampling of well water in West Bengal has revealed levels of As that exceed 50 μg/L —concentrations in some samples exceeding 1000 μg/L (Rahman et al., 2005). In 1983-84, several patients treated for arsenicosis in West Bengal came from neighboring Bangladesh. Sampling in Bangladesh during the early 1990s of waters from tube wells (installed two decades earlier to provide what was thought to be safe, pathogen-free drinking water) revealed elevated concentrations of As (Smith et al., 2000).

Continued sampling throughout West Bengal showed concentrations ranging from <1 to 2,500 μg/L (Nordstrom, 2002). Although the population exposed to As-contaminated water in West Bengal was ultimately estimated to have been about 6,000,000, the exposed population in Bangladesh has been estimated to be about five times that number (Nordstrom, 2002), making the contamination in Bangladesh the arsenic-related public health problem of the greatest magnitude yet observed. Following the early discoveries in West Bengal and Bangladesh, wellwater sampling in Vietnam, Cambodia, and Pakistan also identified contamination of ground‐ water with As (Agusa et al., 2006; Berg et al., 2001; Chanpiwat et al., 2011; Hoang et al., 2010; Luu et al., 2009; Nickson et al., 2005; Smedley, 2008; Sthiannopkao et al., 2008;), as well as in 1999, Nepal (Gurung et al., 2005), and in 2000, Myanmar (Tun, 2003).

Health problems attributed to As exposure were first noted within a district in a province of Thailand in 1987. Sampling indicated As at concentrations in groundwater that exceeded 5,000 μg/L with about 15,000 people thought to have been exposed (Nordstrom, 2002; Smedley, 2008). Sampling of well waters during the 1990s and later in northern parts of China, including Inner Mongolia, have shown groundwater As concentrations that range widely, from <1 to about 2,400 μg/L (Nordstrom, 2002; Smedley, 2008). In Japan, As levels were found to be high in geothermal waters and springs as early as the 1950s (Noguchi and Nakagawa, 1969), and As contamination of groundwater was noted in 1994. Exposure to As from industrial sources was noted as early as the 1950s (Mukherjee et al., 2006). In 1981 in Iran, chronic arsenic poisoning was noticed and subsequent well-water sampling revealed concentrations exceed‐ ing 1,000 μg/L (Mukherjee et al., 2006).

The discoveries of As contamination of groundwater have occurred over a span of nearly 100 years, the most recent within the last decade. Observations of health problems first led to the realization that As was being inadvertently ingested. Arsenic poisoning in humans in Argen‐ tina was recognized as early as 1913, and attributed to the drinking of groundwater (Bund‐ schuh et al., 2012, and reference therein). A possible connection between skin cancers and drinking water was recognized in Taiwan during the 1930s (Chen et al., 1994). In the 1940s, As contamination of well water in the Pannonian Basin in Romania and adjacent Hungary was discovered (Gurzau and Pop, 2012; Mukherjee et al., 2006). Recognition of similar occurrences in other European countries such as southwestern England, Germany, Greece, and Spain followed, and groundwaters with As concentrations that exceed standards are now observed

86 Current Perspectives in Contaminant Hydrology and Water Resources Sustainability

in more than 70 countries worldwide (Nordstrom, 2002; Ravenscroft et al., 2009).

and 1980s (Wang and Mulligan, 2006a).

During the mid-20th century, instances of As contamination of groundwater were reported for the western USA and Alaska (Welch et al., 1988; Mueller et al., 2001), but were not fully recognized in the states of Oklahoma, Texas, and Arkansas and in the Midwest and North‐ eastern parts of the country until the 1980s (Ayotte et al., 2003; Ayotte et al., 1999; Haque et al., 2008; Peters, 2008; Peters and Burkert, 2007; Scanlon et al., 2009; Sharif et al., 2008; Welch et al., 2000 and references therein). Most recently, groundwater containing As in excess of USA Federal and State MCLs was found in parts of the Atlantic Coastal Plain (Barringer et al., 2010; Drummond and Bolton, 2010; Haque et al., 2008; Mumford et al., 2012; Pearcy et al., 2011). In Canada, As-contaminated groundwaters in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia were noted in the 1970s (Bottomley, 1984), and instances in western Canada were noted in the 1960s

In West Bengal, India, cases of arsenic poisoning were first noted in 1983-84, according to Rahman et al. (2005), although Mandal and Suzuki place 1978 as the time when arsenicosis (skin lesions) and groundwater contamination were first noticed in West Bengal. Since the 1980s, extensive sampling of well water in West Bengal has revealed levels of As that exceed 50 μg/L —concentrations in some samples exceeding 1000 μg/L (Rahman et al., 2005). In 1983-84, several patients treated for arsenicosis in West Bengal came from neighboring Bangladesh. Sampling in Bangladesh during the early 1990s of waters from tube wells (installed two decades earlier to provide what was thought to be safe, pathogen-free drinking

Continued sampling throughout West Bengal showed concentrations ranging from <1 to 2,500 μg/L (Nordstrom, 2002). Although the population exposed to As-contaminated water in West Bengal was ultimately estimated to have been about 6,000,000, the exposed population in Bangladesh has been estimated to be about five times that number (Nordstrom, 2002), making the contamination in Bangladesh the arsenic-related public health problem of the greatest magnitude yet observed. Following the early discoveries in West Bengal and Bangladesh, wellwater sampling in Vietnam, Cambodia, and Pakistan also identified contamination of ground‐ water with As (Agusa et al., 2006; Berg et al., 2001; Chanpiwat et al., 2011; Hoang et al., 2010; Luu et al., 2009; Nickson et al., 2005; Smedley, 2008; Sthiannopkao et al., 2008;), as well as in

water) revealed elevated concentrations of As (Smith et al., 2000).

1999, Nepal (Gurung et al., 2005), and in 2000, Myanmar (Tun, 2003).

Arsenic contamination of both surface water and groundwater also is found in many Latin American countries, but the full extent of the problem is not yet clear (Bundschuh et al., 2012). Groundwater concentrations in Argentina are reported to range as high as about 15,000 μg/L (Bundschuh et al., and references therein). High levels of As were found in waters in Chile and Mexico in the 1950s and 60s (Bundschuh et al., 2012; Rosas et al., 1999). In northern Chile, As concentrations in groundwater ranged from 20 to 5,000 μg/L, and there is strong evidence from hair, skin, bones and funerary preparations (clay, paint) of Chinchor‐ ro culture mummies that the population there was exposed to high levels of As more than 7,000 years ago (Bundschuh et al., 2012), and, presumably, has been ever since. Concentra‐ tions of As in groundwater in Mexico generally are not reported to reach the higher levels found in Argentina except for a geothermal area in Michoacán, where 24,000 μg/L are reported (Bundschuh et al., 2012, and references therein). In mined areas of Mexico, leaching from tailings piles have contributed As to groundwater (Carillo-Chávez et al., 2000; Méndez and Armienta, 2003). Arsenic-contaminated surface water and groundwater subsequently was recognized in parts of Peru in the 1970s (Bundschuh et al., 2010). Although As contamination of waters in Argentina, Chile, Mexico and Peru was known from the early and mid-20th century, surface water and (or) groundwaters (and geothermal waters) containing geogenic As at contaminant levels were discovered in alluvial, metasedimenta‐ ry, volcanic, and metavolcanic aquifers only since the late 1990s in Bolivia, Brazil, Colum‐ bia, Cuba, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Uruguay (Bundschuh et al., 2012).

In Africa, the occurrence of high concentrations of As in groundwater from wells in a village in Burkina Faso was first noticed in the 1970s, but more extensive sampling did not occur until several decades later (Smedley, 2008). Arsenic-related skin diseases were noted in the region, and, although many wells yielded water with As concentrations < 10 μg/L, concentrations as high as 1,600 μg/L were found (Smedley et al., 2007). Effects of mining on soils and waters in other African countries (Ghana and Zambia) have been studied only recently (e.g., Bowell et al., 1994; Nakayama et al., 2011; Smedley and Kinniburgh (2002); As contamination of ground‐ water has been reported in Ghana. Arsenic contamination of well water was discovered during the drought in Perth, Australia in 2002 (Appleyard et al., 2006).

## **2. Sources of arsenic**

## **2.1. Anthropogenic sources**

Sources of As that arise from human activities include mining and processing of ores and manufacturing using As-bearing sulfides. Smelters in numerous countries, including Canada, Chile, Italy, South Africa, the USA, and the former USSR have processed metal ores (mainly copper, but also zinc, gold, and tin) that contain As. The smelting process, both recent and ancient, has released As to the air and soils both locally and globally (Matschullat, 2000). Elevated As levels in precipitation and in soils surrounding smelters have frequently been documented (e.g., Ball et al., 1983; Beaulieu and Savage, 2005; Carpenter et al., 1978). Disposal of mining wastes has caused As contamination of groundwater in numerous places, including in Thailand, Ghana, and Turkey (Gunduz et al., 2010; Smedley and Kinniburgh, 2002; Smedley, 2008). In southwestern England, mineral deposits and mineral processing (tin, copper, with accessory As minerals) are recognized sources of As to soils and groundwater (Brunt et al., 2004; Camm et al., 2004; Palumbo-Roe et al., 2007). In southeastern Europe (Serbia, Bosnia, Poland), and in Spain, mining activities left a legacy of arsenic that has contaminated soils and waters (Dangic, 2007; Gomez et al., 2006; Karczewska et al., 2007). Groundwater contamination in mined areas is also found in parts of the western USA and Canada (Moncur et al., 2005; Welch et al., 2000).

There have been military uses of As, and attempts to recycle As-bearing materials. Arsenic was used in chemical warfare agents, most recently in the first half of the 20th century (Krüger et al., 2007). In the 1930s, concern over disposal of stockpiles of As compounds led to experi‐ ments with incorporating As in cement which was then used to coat pilings and other wooden structures (van Siclen and Gerry, 1936). One ounce of white arsenic was added to 12 pounds of sand and 3 pounds of cement, water was added and the slurry was applied to wood pilings by air gun. To the authors' knowledge, no studies of the effects of this practice on the envi‐ ronment have been published. Arsenic currently is used in various electronic devices, and improper disposal and lack of care in recycling these materials also can add As to the envi‐

Arsenic in Groundwater: A Summary of Sources and the Biogeochemical and Hydrogeologic Factors Affecting…

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55354

89

Anthropogenic sources of As can affect the quality of surface water through groundwater discharge and runoff (Hemond, 1995; Martin and Pederson 2002). In the case of pesticides, the effect can be through direct applications to water bodies for control of nuisance vegetation (Kobayashi and Lee, 1978; Tanner and Clayton, 1990; Durant et al., 2004). Although ground‐ water contamination does exist at various sites affected by agricultural, industrial or military releases, for example (e.g., Hemond, 1995; Krüger et al. 2007; USEPA, 2011), contamination introduced at the land surface does not always move to groundwater. Owing to the affinity of As for soil constituents such as metal oxides and hydroxides (mainly iron (Fe), aluminum (Al), and manganese (Mn)) and clays (Goldberg and Glaubig, 1988; Manning and Goldberg, 1996), the As can be attenuated in the intervening soils by sorption to Fe hydroxides or clays, or by precipitation reactions, such as formation of As- or Fe-sulfides in anoxic soils (e.g., Brunt et al.,

For most known areally extensive instances of As contamination of groundwater, the sources of the As have been shown to be geogenic (Smedley and Kinniburgh, 2002). A summary table of the worldwide occurrence of As in groundwater (Nordstrom, 2002) indicates that mining of arsenic and metal ores and natural geologic sources of As dominate the environmental

There are about 24 As-bearing minerals that are commonly found in hydrothermal veins, ore deposits, and rocks. Most primary As minerals are sulfides, of which arsenopyrite is the most common (Ehrlich and Newman, 2009). Secondary minerals tend to be less common arsenates and oxides. WHO (2001) provides a list of these minerals, which also can be found tabulated in Mandal and Suzuki (2002, p. 203). Arsenic in crustal rocks also has an affinity for, and is associated with, pyrite or Fe hydroxides and oxides (Nordstrom, 2002) for which chemical formulas are FeS2, FeOOH, Fe2O3, and Fe3O4, respectively. The As content of crustal rocks varies widely; Smedley and Kinniburgh, 2002, p. 531) compile and tabulate those results. Concen‐

trations of As in water associated with crustal rocks are described below.

ronment (Brooks, 2008).

2004; Cancès et al, 2008).

**2.2. Geologic sources**

*2.2.1. Arsenic minerals*

conditions listed for inputs of As to groundwater.

Arsenic compounds have been used in the manufacture of numerous products. Arsenic has been used in glass production and by the wood-preservation industry. The latter industry has been, through the end of the 20th century, the most active user of such compounds in the USA (Welch et al., 2000), but the industry's voluntary reduction of the use of chromated copper arsenate (CCA) since 2003 has resulted in a more limited availability of CCA treated wood and products (Brooks, 2008). Contamination of soils and surface-water bodies has resulted from use of CCA-treated wood (Khan et al., 2006; Rice et al., 2002).

The use of inorganic arsenical pesticides has waned in recent years owing to bans in the 1980s and 90s (Welch et al., 2000), but, in the past, manufacture and use of arsenical pesticides were important contributors of As to the environment (e.g., Barringer et al., 1998; Barringer et al., 2001; USEPA, 2011). Inorganic arsenicals have been used on a variety of crops (citrus, cotton, tobacco, and potatoes) and on fruit trees; (Walsh and Keeney, 1975; Welch et al., 2000). The use of lead-arsenate pesticides in orchards has prompted concern that additions of phosphate fertilizers could displace arsenate sorbed to soil particles, mobilizing As to groundwater (e.g. Davenport and Peryea, 1991). Manufacture of pesticides has been responsible for As contam‐ ination of soil, surface water, and groundwater. Examples of contamination caused by former pesticide manufacture are found in India and in the USA (Barringer et al., 1998; Mukherjee et al., 2006; USEPA, 2011). Soil contamination by As may also occur in areas where soils are amended with chicken and swine manure. Such fertilizers can contain As due to use of chicken and swine feeds containing the growth additive Roxarsone, an organic arsenical (4-hydroxy-3 nitrophenylarsonic acid) (Hileman, 2007; O'Day, 2006).

There have been military uses of As, and attempts to recycle As-bearing materials. Arsenic was used in chemical warfare agents, most recently in the first half of the 20th century (Krüger et al., 2007). In the 1930s, concern over disposal of stockpiles of As compounds led to experi‐ ments with incorporating As in cement which was then used to coat pilings and other wooden structures (van Siclen and Gerry, 1936). One ounce of white arsenic was added to 12 pounds of sand and 3 pounds of cement, water was added and the slurry was applied to wood pilings by air gun. To the authors' knowledge, no studies of the effects of this practice on the envi‐ ronment have been published. Arsenic currently is used in various electronic devices, and improper disposal and lack of care in recycling these materials also can add As to the envi‐ ronment (Brooks, 2008).

Anthropogenic sources of As can affect the quality of surface water through groundwater discharge and runoff (Hemond, 1995; Martin and Pederson 2002). In the case of pesticides, the effect can be through direct applications to water bodies for control of nuisance vegetation (Kobayashi and Lee, 1978; Tanner and Clayton, 1990; Durant et al., 2004). Although ground‐ water contamination does exist at various sites affected by agricultural, industrial or military releases, for example (e.g., Hemond, 1995; Krüger et al. 2007; USEPA, 2011), contamination introduced at the land surface does not always move to groundwater. Owing to the affinity of As for soil constituents such as metal oxides and hydroxides (mainly iron (Fe), aluminum (Al), and manganese (Mn)) and clays (Goldberg and Glaubig, 1988; Manning and Goldberg, 1996), the As can be attenuated in the intervening soils by sorption to Fe hydroxides or clays, or by precipitation reactions, such as formation of As- or Fe-sulfides in anoxic soils (e.g., Brunt et al., 2004; Cancès et al, 2008).

## **2.2. Geologic sources**

**2. Sources of arsenic**

**2.1. Anthropogenic sources**

Welch et al., 2000).

Sources of As that arise from human activities include mining and processing of ores and manufacturing using As-bearing sulfides. Smelters in numerous countries, including Canada, Chile, Italy, South Africa, the USA, and the former USSR have processed metal ores (mainly copper, but also zinc, gold, and tin) that contain As. The smelting process, both recent and ancient, has released As to the air and soils both locally and globally (Matschullat, 2000). Elevated As levels in precipitation and in soils surrounding smelters have frequently been documented (e.g., Ball et al., 1983; Beaulieu and Savage, 2005; Carpenter et al., 1978). Disposal of mining wastes has caused As contamination of groundwater in numerous places, including in Thailand, Ghana, and Turkey (Gunduz et al., 2010; Smedley and Kinniburgh, 2002; Smedley, 2008). In southwestern England, mineral deposits and mineral processing (tin, copper, with accessory As minerals) are recognized sources of As to soils and groundwater (Brunt et al., 2004; Camm et al., 2004; Palumbo-Roe et al., 2007). In southeastern Europe (Serbia, Bosnia, Poland), and in Spain, mining activities left a legacy of arsenic that has contaminated soils and waters (Dangic, 2007; Gomez et al., 2006; Karczewska et al., 2007). Groundwater contamination in mined areas is also found in parts of the western USA and Canada (Moncur et al., 2005;

Arsenic compounds have been used in the manufacture of numerous products. Arsenic has been used in glass production and by the wood-preservation industry. The latter industry has been, through the end of the 20th century, the most active user of such compounds in the USA (Welch et al., 2000), but the industry's voluntary reduction of the use of chromated copper arsenate (CCA) since 2003 has resulted in a more limited availability of CCA treated wood and products (Brooks, 2008). Contamination of soils and surface-water bodies has resulted from

The use of inorganic arsenical pesticides has waned in recent years owing to bans in the 1980s and 90s (Welch et al., 2000), but, in the past, manufacture and use of arsenical pesticides were important contributors of As to the environment (e.g., Barringer et al., 1998; Barringer et al., 2001; USEPA, 2011). Inorganic arsenicals have been used on a variety of crops (citrus, cotton, tobacco, and potatoes) and on fruit trees; (Walsh and Keeney, 1975; Welch et al., 2000). The use of lead-arsenate pesticides in orchards has prompted concern that additions of phosphate fertilizers could displace arsenate sorbed to soil particles, mobilizing As to groundwater (e.g. Davenport and Peryea, 1991). Manufacture of pesticides has been responsible for As contam‐ ination of soil, surface water, and groundwater. Examples of contamination caused by former pesticide manufacture are found in India and in the USA (Barringer et al., 1998; Mukherjee et al., 2006; USEPA, 2011). Soil contamination by As may also occur in areas where soils are amended with chicken and swine manure. Such fertilizers can contain As due to use of chicken and swine feeds containing the growth additive Roxarsone, an organic arsenical (4-hydroxy-3-

use of CCA-treated wood (Khan et al., 2006; Rice et al., 2002).

88 Current Perspectives in Contaminant Hydrology and Water Resources Sustainability

nitrophenylarsonic acid) (Hileman, 2007; O'Day, 2006).

## *2.2.1. Arsenic minerals*

For most known areally extensive instances of As contamination of groundwater, the sources of the As have been shown to be geogenic (Smedley and Kinniburgh, 2002). A summary table of the worldwide occurrence of As in groundwater (Nordstrom, 2002) indicates that mining of arsenic and metal ores and natural geologic sources of As dominate the environmental conditions listed for inputs of As to groundwater.

There are about 24 As-bearing minerals that are commonly found in hydrothermal veins, ore deposits, and rocks. Most primary As minerals are sulfides, of which arsenopyrite is the most common (Ehrlich and Newman, 2009). Secondary minerals tend to be less common arsenates and oxides. WHO (2001) provides a list of these minerals, which also can be found tabulated in Mandal and Suzuki (2002, p. 203). Arsenic in crustal rocks also has an affinity for, and is associated with, pyrite or Fe hydroxides and oxides (Nordstrom, 2002) for which chemical formulas are FeS2, FeOOH, Fe2O3, and Fe3O4, respectively. The As content of crustal rocks varies widely; Smedley and Kinniburgh, 2002, p. 531) compile and tabulate those results. Concen‐ trations of As in water associated with crustal rocks are described below.

## *2.2.2. Geothermal activity, volcanic and plutonic rocks, and mineralized zones*

Geothermally active zones occur along plate boundaries, in tectonic rift areas such those in East Africa and at seafloor spreading centers, such as in Iceland, and at "hot spots" where mantle-derived plumes ascend, such as in Hawaii and Yellowstone National Park, USA. Arsenic is one of a suite of incompatible elements (these do not fit easily into the lattices of common rock-forming minerals), which include antimony (Sb), boron (B), fluoride (F), lithium (Li), mercury (Hg), selenium (Se) and thallium (Tl). Together with hydrogen sulfide, these elements are ubiquitous in high-temperature geothermal settings (Webster and Nordstrom, 2003). Concentrations of arsenic are high mainly in geothermal waters that leach continental rocks; geothermal waters in basaltic rocks, such as in Iceland, contain lesser amounts of As. Arsenic in hot geothermal fluids was shown to be derived mainly from leaching of host rocks at Yellowstone National Park, in Wyoming, USA (Stauffer and Thompson, 1984), rather than derived from magmas. The As in the hot fluid is present as As(III) in arsenious acid (H3AsO3); in low-sulfide fluids, the arsenite in the arsenious acid is oxidized to arsenate as the rising fluid mixes with cold oxygenated groundwater or encounters the atmosphere. In high sulfide solutions, As may be present as thioarsenate complexes (Webster and Nordstrom, 2003; Planer-Friedrich et al., 2007).

In Latin America, volcanic and geothermal activity along the Pacific tectonic plate boundaries produces As-rich waters and gases in springs and fumaroles. In sodium-chloride (Na-Cl)-rich waters, As concentrations can reach about 50,000 μg/L at the El Tatio geothermal field in Chile (Lopez et al, 2012). Arsenic concentrations in waters of geothermal fields in Mexico vary; 250 to 73,600 μg/L are reported, where the host rocks through which these waters have risen include sandstones and shales, lava flows and pyroclastics, and metamorphosed carbonate

Arsenic in Groundwater: A Summary of Sources and the Biogeochemical and Hydrogeologic Factors Affecting…

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55354

91

In the coastal volcanic areas of Central and South American countries, rocks are mainly andesitic or rhyolitic in composition. Arsenic concentrations in the geothermal springs throughout these areas vary widely—concentrations of several thousand micrograms per liter are reported, but none are reported as high as the highest concentration in a Mexican geothermal field (see above). Where springs and fumaroles discharge water and gases to a lake in the Bolivian Altiplano, however, As concentrations in the lake water are reported as high as 4,600,000 μg/L, the As apparently being contributed by oxidation of sulfide depos‐

Dissolution of volcanic glasses in ash layers and leaching of loess-type deposits in the Chaco-Pampean plain of Argentina have resulted in groundwater As concentrations that range from <10 to 5,300 μg/L (Nicolli, et al., 2012) where the potentially affected rural population numbers several million people. Mining of various metals (gold, copper, silver) in Latin America has played an important role in mobilizing As from the geologic materials and exacerbating

In Europe, groundwaters containing As at concentrations that exceed 50 μg/L are found in geothermal fields of the Massif Central in France, and in Greece, (Brunt et al., 2004; Karydakis et al., 2005). Iceland, where As concentrations in groundwater can exceed 10 μg/L (Arnórsson, 2003) sits astride the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, and is subject to outpourings of basaltic lava that typically contain less As than do more silicic lavas (Onishi and Sandell (1955; Baur and Onishi, 1969; Ure and Berrow, 1982). In geothermal systems of northern and northeastern Spain, the As concentrations are high and deposit As-rich minerals (Navarro et al., 2011); the Caldes de Malavella field in northern Spain contributes substantial As to groundwater—50-80 μg/L in springs, and from <1 to 200 μg/L in groundwater (Piqué et al., 2010). Groundwaters (including brines) contained As concentrations ranging from 1.6 to 6,900 μg/L in the Phlegraean Fields in southern Italy (Aiuppa et al., 2006). Quaternary volcanic rocks with hydrothermal activity on the island of Ischia (offshore from Naples, Italy) impart As to groundwater at concentrations

In the Mid-East, in northwestern Iran, As concentrations in thermal waters and hot springs are as high as 3,500 and 890 μg/L, respectively, in the area of Mt. Sabalan, a stratavolcano (Haeri et al, 2011). In western Anatolia, in Turkey, natural leaching, aided by pumping and discharge of waste geothermal fluids from an active geothermal system, has mobilized As from meta‐ morphic, igneous and sedimentary rocks to groundwater in a shallow alluvial aquifer, where highest As concentrations in groundwater and geothermal waters were 561 and 594 μg/L,

rocks, basalts and hornblende andesites (Lopez et al., 2012).

contamination of groundwater resources (McClintock et al., 2012).

that range up to 3,800 μg/L (Aiuppa, et al., 2006; Daniele, 2004).

respectively (Gunduz and Simsek (2008).

its (Lopez et al., 2012).

In the western USA, there are As inputs to groundwater and surface water from geothermal fluids in and near Yellowstone National Park (e.g., Ball et al., 1998, 2002; Nimick et al., 1998) and in other western mineralized areas (Welch et al., 1988). Groundwater associated with volcanics (tuffs and rhyolites) in California contain As at concentrations ranging up to 48,000 μg/L, with As-bearing sulfide minerals as the main source of As (Welch et al., 1988, and references therein). Geothermal waters on Dominica in the Lesser Antilles also contain concentrations of As >50 μg/L (McCarthy et al., 2005).

In general, because arsenic is an incompatible element, it accumulates in differentiated magmas, and is commonly found at higher concentrations in volcanic rocks of intermediate (andesites) to felsic (rhyolites) composition than in mafic (basaltic) rocks—as shown for the western USA (Welch et al., 1988; Welch et al., 2000). In Maine and New Hampshire, USA, where As-contaminated groundwater is present, pegmatites, granites and metamorphic rocks (granofels) were found to have substantial As contents—up to 60, 46 and 39 mg/kg, respectively (Peters, 2008; Peters et al., 1999; Peters and Blum, 2003). Weathering of pegmatite veins in Connecticut, USA, was thought to contribute As to groundwater (Brown and Chute, 2002). Although the As content of mafic rocks can be relatively low, fractured ultramafic rocks in Vermont, USA, contribute up to 327 μg/L of As to groundwater (Ryan et al., 2011).

Leached from surrounding rocks, As in hot springs from geothermal fields in New Zealand is found at concentrations that range to 4,800 μg/L (Brown and Simmons, 2003). Acidic (pH 1.2) geothermal springs in Japan contained As at 2,600 μg/L (Noguchi and Nakagawa, 1969). Arsenic in these springs precipitated out as As sulfides and lead (Pb) As sulfides in surfacewater sediments. The As contents of the sediments ranged from about 5 to 56 wt. % (Noguchi and Nakagawa, 1969).

In Latin America, volcanic and geothermal activity along the Pacific tectonic plate boundaries produces As-rich waters and gases in springs and fumaroles. In sodium-chloride (Na-Cl)-rich waters, As concentrations can reach about 50,000 μg/L at the El Tatio geothermal field in Chile (Lopez et al, 2012). Arsenic concentrations in waters of geothermal fields in Mexico vary; 250 to 73,600 μg/L are reported, where the host rocks through which these waters have risen include sandstones and shales, lava flows and pyroclastics, and metamorphosed carbonate rocks, basalts and hornblende andesites (Lopez et al., 2012).

*2.2.2. Geothermal activity, volcanic and plutonic rocks, and mineralized zones*

90 Current Perspectives in Contaminant Hydrology and Water Resources Sustainability

Friedrich et al., 2007).

and Nakagawa, 1969).

concentrations of As >50 μg/L (McCarthy et al., 2005).

Geothermally active zones occur along plate boundaries, in tectonic rift areas such those in East Africa and at seafloor spreading centers, such as in Iceland, and at "hot spots" where mantle-derived plumes ascend, such as in Hawaii and Yellowstone National Park, USA. Arsenic is one of a suite of incompatible elements (these do not fit easily into the lattices of common rock-forming minerals), which include antimony (Sb), boron (B), fluoride (F), lithium (Li), mercury (Hg), selenium (Se) and thallium (Tl). Together with hydrogen sulfide, these elements are ubiquitous in high-temperature geothermal settings (Webster and Nordstrom, 2003). Concentrations of arsenic are high mainly in geothermal waters that leach continental rocks; geothermal waters in basaltic rocks, such as in Iceland, contain lesser amounts of As. Arsenic in hot geothermal fluids was shown to be derived mainly from leaching of host rocks at Yellowstone National Park, in Wyoming, USA (Stauffer and Thompson, 1984), rather than derived from magmas. The As in the hot fluid is present as As(III) in arsenious acid (H3AsO3); in low-sulfide fluids, the arsenite in the arsenious acid is oxidized to arsenate as the rising fluid mixes with cold oxygenated groundwater or encounters the atmosphere. In high sulfide solutions, As may be present as thioarsenate complexes (Webster and Nordstrom, 2003; Planer-

In the western USA, there are As inputs to groundwater and surface water from geothermal fluids in and near Yellowstone National Park (e.g., Ball et al., 1998, 2002; Nimick et al., 1998) and in other western mineralized areas (Welch et al., 1988). Groundwater associated with volcanics (tuffs and rhyolites) in California contain As at concentrations ranging up to 48,000 μg/L, with As-bearing sulfide minerals as the main source of As (Welch et al., 1988, and references therein). Geothermal waters on Dominica in the Lesser Antilles also contain

In general, because arsenic is an incompatible element, it accumulates in differentiated magmas, and is commonly found at higher concentrations in volcanic rocks of intermediate (andesites) to felsic (rhyolites) composition than in mafic (basaltic) rocks—as shown for the western USA (Welch et al., 1988; Welch et al., 2000). In Maine and New Hampshire, USA, where As-contaminated groundwater is present, pegmatites, granites and metamorphic rocks (granofels) were found to have substantial As contents—up to 60, 46 and 39 mg/kg, respectively (Peters, 2008; Peters et al., 1999; Peters and Blum, 2003). Weathering of pegmatite veins in Connecticut, USA, was thought to contribute As to groundwater (Brown and Chute, 2002). Although the As content of mafic rocks can be relatively low, fractured ultramafic rocks in

Vermont, USA, contribute up to 327 μg/L of As to groundwater (Ryan et al., 2011).

Leached from surrounding rocks, As in hot springs from geothermal fields in New Zealand is found at concentrations that range to 4,800 μg/L (Brown and Simmons, 2003). Acidic (pH 1.2) geothermal springs in Japan contained As at 2,600 μg/L (Noguchi and Nakagawa, 1969). Arsenic in these springs precipitated out as As sulfides and lead (Pb) As sulfides in surfacewater sediments. The As contents of the sediments ranged from about 5 to 56 wt. % (Noguchi In the coastal volcanic areas of Central and South American countries, rocks are mainly andesitic or rhyolitic in composition. Arsenic concentrations in the geothermal springs throughout these areas vary widely—concentrations of several thousand micrograms per liter are reported, but none are reported as high as the highest concentration in a Mexican geothermal field (see above). Where springs and fumaroles discharge water and gases to a lake in the Bolivian Altiplano, however, As concentrations in the lake water are reported as high as 4,600,000 μg/L, the As apparently being contributed by oxidation of sulfide depos‐ its (Lopez et al., 2012).

Dissolution of volcanic glasses in ash layers and leaching of loess-type deposits in the Chaco-Pampean plain of Argentina have resulted in groundwater As concentrations that range from <10 to 5,300 μg/L (Nicolli, et al., 2012) where the potentially affected rural population numbers several million people. Mining of various metals (gold, copper, silver) in Latin America has played an important role in mobilizing As from the geologic materials and exacerbating contamination of groundwater resources (McClintock et al., 2012).

In Europe, groundwaters containing As at concentrations that exceed 50 μg/L are found in geothermal fields of the Massif Central in France, and in Greece, (Brunt et al., 2004; Karydakis et al., 2005). Iceland, where As concentrations in groundwater can exceed 10 μg/L (Arnórsson, 2003) sits astride the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, and is subject to outpourings of basaltic lava that typically contain less As than do more silicic lavas (Onishi and Sandell (1955; Baur and Onishi, 1969; Ure and Berrow, 1982). In geothermal systems of northern and northeastern Spain, the As concentrations are high and deposit As-rich minerals (Navarro et al., 2011); the Caldes de Malavella field in northern Spain contributes substantial As to groundwater—50-80 μg/L in springs, and from <1 to 200 μg/L in groundwater (Piqué et al., 2010). Groundwaters (including brines) contained As concentrations ranging from 1.6 to 6,900 μg/L in the Phlegraean Fields in southern Italy (Aiuppa et al., 2006). Quaternary volcanic rocks with hydrothermal activity on the island of Ischia (offshore from Naples, Italy) impart As to groundwater at concentrations that range up to 3,800 μg/L (Aiuppa, et al., 2006; Daniele, 2004).

In the Mid-East, in northwestern Iran, As concentrations in thermal waters and hot springs are as high as 3,500 and 890 μg/L, respectively, in the area of Mt. Sabalan, a stratavolcano (Haeri et al, 2011). In western Anatolia, in Turkey, natural leaching, aided by pumping and discharge of waste geothermal fluids from an active geothermal system, has mobilized As from meta‐ morphic, igneous and sedimentary rocks to groundwater in a shallow alluvial aquifer, where highest As concentrations in groundwater and geothermal waters were 561 and 594 μg/L, respectively (Gunduz and Simsek (2008).

Groundwater in early Proterozoic silicic volcanics and granites of the Chhattisgarh Basin of India contains As at concentrations that exceed 10 μg/L. The As is perhaps emplaced there by hydrothermal fluids (Acharyya, 2002).

In Taiwan, groundwater from artesian wells completed in black shales, muds and fine sands is contaminated with As. In northern Bavaria, mineralized sandstone yields As-contaminated

Arsenic in Groundwater: A Summary of Sources and the Biogeochemical and Hydrogeologic Factors Affecting…

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55354

93

Carbonate rocks typically contain low concentrations of As (Baur and Onishi, 1969; Smedley and Kinniburgh, 2002), although some limestones may contain As-bearing pyrite (e.g. Price and Pichler, 2006). Because arsenate can substitute for phosphate in minerals, phosphorite deposits can contain substantial amounts of As—up to about 400 mg/kg is reported (Smedley and Kinniburgh, 2002). Barringer et al. (2011) report 19.5 to 56.6 mg/kg of As in phosphorite

The As content of meta-sedimentary rocks varies widely, with the contents of gneisses and quartzites generally < 10 mg/kg, and higher As contents for slates and phyllites —up to 143 mg/kg (Boyle and Jonasson, 1973). In the New England states of northeastern USA, ground‐ water contamination with As was found to be prevalent in water from wells completed in formations containing metapelite rocks (schists, phyllites, slates), particularly those rocks adjacent to intrusive bodies. In New England, meta-shales contain As-bearing minerals pyrrhotite, cobaltite, and arsenopyrite, and supergene minerals include orpiment (AsS) and loellingite (FeAs2)(Foley et al., 2002). Mineralization in a Proterozoic marble in New Jersey, USA, has resulted in zinc ores and, in addition to arsenopyrite and loellingite, a variety of uncommon As-bearing minerals. Past mining activities have contributed to the release of As from the bedrock to shallow groundwater; concentrations ranged from 2.02 to 22.0 μg/L in water discharging to the area's major river, the Wallkill River (Barringer et al., 2007). In mineralized meta-sedimentary rocks containing sulfide minerals in Fairbanks, Alaska, USA, groundwater contains As at concentrations that range from <3 μg/L to 1,670 μg/L (Mueller

The sediments shed from the Himalayas have formed the extensive alluvial plain and delta through which the Ganges, Brahmaputra and Meghna Rivers flow and which form aquifers in India (West Bengal Delta Region) and adjacent Bangladesh. To the east, the deltas of the Mekong and Red Rivers form aquifers in Vietnam and adjacent Cambodia and Laos. Arsenic released from these sediments has caused the most widespread contamination in the world, with populations of many millions affected by drinking As-laden well water. The largest number of people (about 35 million) exposed to As contamination is in Bangladesh, and about 6 million in neighboring West Bengal, India (Nordstrom, 2002). The As contents of these young sediments are not extremely high—about 1 to 15 mg/kg, but vary with depth (Smedley, 2008). The concentrations of As in groundwater range, however, from undetectable to several thousand μg/L, with a survey of about 3,200 wells in Bangladesh by researchers from the United Kingdom (UK) and Bangladesh finding that As concentrations in about 27% of samples exceeded 50 μg/L, the Bangladeshi Drinking Water Standard (Smedley, 2008). In local areas, the percentage of affected wells was higher; in central Bangladesh, As in water from about 75% of 6000 wells exceeded 50 μg/L (van Geen et al., 2003). The sediments of Holocene age are micaceous sands, silts, and clays. Reduced, gray sediments of the upper aquifer, where As

groundwater (Smedley and Kinniburgh, 2002).

deposits in the Coastal Plain of New Jersey, USA.

*2.2.4. Alluvial and coastal plain unconsolidated sediments*

et al., 2001).

#### *2.2.3. Sedimentary and meta-sedimentary bedrock*

Arsenic is found in coals, with the content of some coals from southwestern China being highest—826 to 2,578 mg/kg is reported (Nriagu et al., 2007) and up to 32,000 mg/kg is listed by Wang et al., (2006). In Germany, the As content of bituminous shales ranges from 100 to 900 mg/kg (Smedley and Kinniburgh, 2002). The As contents of American coals are reported to range as high as 2,200 mg/kg (Wang et al., 2006), but the mean concentration for more than 7000 samples is about 24 mg/kg (Kolker et al., 2006). Pyrite is the main source of As in coals with high As content, whereas in lower As coals, the As tends to be associated with the organic material (Yudovich and Ketris, 2005). In Pennsylvania, USA, As concentrations in water discharging from abandoned anthracite mines ranged from <0.03 to 15 μg/L and from abandoned bituminous mines, from 0.10 to 64 μg/L, with 10% of samples exceeding the USEPA MCL of 10 μg/L (Cravotta, 2008).

In Wisconsin, USA, As concentrations of water in sandstone and dolomite aquifers were as high as 100 μg/L. Oxidation of pyrite hosted by these formations was the likely source of the As, the transport of which was, in some instances, retarded by its association with Fe oxy‐ hydroxides (Burkel and Stoll, 1999; Thornburg and Sahai, 2004). In the adjacent State of Michigan, USA, As concentrations in groundwater reached 220 μg/L in another sandstone aquifer (Haack and Rachol, 2000). In Australia, a combination of increased water withdrawals during development and declining recharge due to drought caused oxidation of pyrite in sedimentary aquifers, resulting in As contamination of well water (Appleyard et al., 2006). In England, groundwater from a sandstone aquifer contained As at concentrations that spanned 10 to 50 μg/L; the As content of the sandstone ranged from 5 to 15 mg/kg. Desorption at pH of about 8 appeared to be the mechanism for As release to groundwater (Kinniburgh et al., 2006). Water from wells completed in a Mesozoic Era sandstone in northern Bavaria also contained As at concentrations from 10 to 150 μg/L (Heinrichs and Udluft, 1999), although the mineralogy contributing the As was not identified.

In the Piedmont of Pennsylvania and New Jersey, USA, groundwater in Mesozoic age aquifers of red and black shale, mudstone, and siltstone contains elevated levels of As—domestic well waters from Pennsylvania contained up to 65 μg/L (Peters and Burkert, 2007), whereas in New Jersey the highest concentration measured recently was 215 μg/L (Serfes, 2005). Pyrites in the reduced black shales and mudstones are a major source of As, with measured As contents of 3,000 and 40,000 mg/kg in some samples (Serfes, 2005). Arsenic (as arsenate) is also released from the red shales by desorption as pH rises above 6.5 (Serfes, 2005). These Piedmont rocks also contain hornfels along contacts with diabase intrusions, some of which contain mineral‐ ization by copper (Cu), As, and uranium (U). Typical As-bearing minerals in the Piedmont rocks include arsenopyrite (FeAsS), cobaltite ((Ni, Co, Fe)AsS), alloclasite ((Co, Fe)AsS), gersdorffite (NiAsS), erythrite (Co3(AsO4)2.8H2O), and safflorite ((Co, Fe, Ni)As2) (Senior and Sloto, 2006).

In Taiwan, groundwater from artesian wells completed in black shales, muds and fine sands is contaminated with As. In northern Bavaria, mineralized sandstone yields As-contaminated groundwater (Smedley and Kinniburgh, 2002).

Carbonate rocks typically contain low concentrations of As (Baur and Onishi, 1969; Smedley and Kinniburgh, 2002), although some limestones may contain As-bearing pyrite (e.g. Price and Pichler, 2006). Because arsenate can substitute for phosphate in minerals, phosphorite deposits can contain substantial amounts of As—up to about 400 mg/kg is reported (Smedley and Kinniburgh, 2002). Barringer et al. (2011) report 19.5 to 56.6 mg/kg of As in phosphorite deposits in the Coastal Plain of New Jersey, USA.

The As content of meta-sedimentary rocks varies widely, with the contents of gneisses and quartzites generally < 10 mg/kg, and higher As contents for slates and phyllites —up to 143 mg/kg (Boyle and Jonasson, 1973). In the New England states of northeastern USA, ground‐ water contamination with As was found to be prevalent in water from wells completed in formations containing metapelite rocks (schists, phyllites, slates), particularly those rocks adjacent to intrusive bodies. In New England, meta-shales contain As-bearing minerals pyrrhotite, cobaltite, and arsenopyrite, and supergene minerals include orpiment (AsS) and loellingite (FeAs2)(Foley et al., 2002). Mineralization in a Proterozoic marble in New Jersey, USA, has resulted in zinc ores and, in addition to arsenopyrite and loellingite, a variety of uncommon As-bearing minerals. Past mining activities have contributed to the release of As from the bedrock to shallow groundwater; concentrations ranged from 2.02 to 22.0 μg/L in water discharging to the area's major river, the Wallkill River (Barringer et al., 2007). In mineralized meta-sedimentary rocks containing sulfide minerals in Fairbanks, Alaska, USA, groundwater contains As at concentrations that range from <3 μg/L to 1,670 μg/L (Mueller et al., 2001).

## *2.2.4. Alluvial and coastal plain unconsolidated sediments*

Groundwater in early Proterozoic silicic volcanics and granites of the Chhattisgarh Basin of India contains As at concentrations that exceed 10 μg/L. The As is perhaps emplaced there by

Arsenic is found in coals, with the content of some coals from southwestern China being highest—826 to 2,578 mg/kg is reported (Nriagu et al., 2007) and up to 32,000 mg/kg is listed by Wang et al., (2006). In Germany, the As content of bituminous shales ranges from 100 to 900 mg/kg (Smedley and Kinniburgh, 2002). The As contents of American coals are reported to range as high as 2,200 mg/kg (Wang et al., 2006), but the mean concentration for more than 7000 samples is about 24 mg/kg (Kolker et al., 2006). Pyrite is the main source of As in coals with high As content, whereas in lower As coals, the As tends to be associated with the organic material (Yudovich and Ketris, 2005). In Pennsylvania, USA, As concentrations in water discharging from abandoned anthracite mines ranged from <0.03 to 15 μg/L and from abandoned bituminous mines, from 0.10 to 64 μg/L, with 10% of samples exceeding the USEPA

In Wisconsin, USA, As concentrations of water in sandstone and dolomite aquifers were as high as 100 μg/L. Oxidation of pyrite hosted by these formations was the likely source of the As, the transport of which was, in some instances, retarded by its association with Fe oxy‐ hydroxides (Burkel and Stoll, 1999; Thornburg and Sahai, 2004). In the adjacent State of Michigan, USA, As concentrations in groundwater reached 220 μg/L in another sandstone aquifer (Haack and Rachol, 2000). In Australia, a combination of increased water withdrawals during development and declining recharge due to drought caused oxidation of pyrite in sedimentary aquifers, resulting in As contamination of well water (Appleyard et al., 2006). In England, groundwater from a sandstone aquifer contained As at concentrations that spanned 10 to 50 μg/L; the As content of the sandstone ranged from 5 to 15 mg/kg. Desorption at pH of about 8 appeared to be the mechanism for As release to groundwater (Kinniburgh et al., 2006). Water from wells completed in a Mesozoic Era sandstone in northern Bavaria also contained As at concentrations from 10 to 150 μg/L (Heinrichs and Udluft, 1999), although the

In the Piedmont of Pennsylvania and New Jersey, USA, groundwater in Mesozoic age aquifers of red and black shale, mudstone, and siltstone contains elevated levels of As—domestic well waters from Pennsylvania contained up to 65 μg/L (Peters and Burkert, 2007), whereas in New Jersey the highest concentration measured recently was 215 μg/L (Serfes, 2005). Pyrites in the reduced black shales and mudstones are a major source of As, with measured As contents of 3,000 and 40,000 mg/kg in some samples (Serfes, 2005). Arsenic (as arsenate) is also released from the red shales by desorption as pH rises above 6.5 (Serfes, 2005). These Piedmont rocks also contain hornfels along contacts with diabase intrusions, some of which contain mineral‐ ization by copper (Cu), As, and uranium (U). Typical As-bearing minerals in the Piedmont rocks include arsenopyrite (FeAsS), cobaltite ((Ni, Co, Fe)AsS), alloclasite ((Co, Fe)AsS), gersdorffite (NiAsS), erythrite (Co3(AsO4)2.8H2O), and safflorite ((Co, Fe, Ni)As2) (Senior and

hydrothermal fluids (Acharyya, 2002).

MCL of 10 μg/L (Cravotta, 2008).

mineralogy contributing the As was not identified.

Sloto, 2006).

*2.2.3. Sedimentary and meta-sedimentary bedrock*

92 Current Perspectives in Contaminant Hydrology and Water Resources Sustainability

The sediments shed from the Himalayas have formed the extensive alluvial plain and delta through which the Ganges, Brahmaputra and Meghna Rivers flow and which form aquifers in India (West Bengal Delta Region) and adjacent Bangladesh. To the east, the deltas of the Mekong and Red Rivers form aquifers in Vietnam and adjacent Cambodia and Laos. Arsenic released from these sediments has caused the most widespread contamination in the world, with populations of many millions affected by drinking As-laden well water. The largest number of people (about 35 million) exposed to As contamination is in Bangladesh, and about 6 million in neighboring West Bengal, India (Nordstrom, 2002). The As contents of these young sediments are not extremely high—about 1 to 15 mg/kg, but vary with depth (Smedley, 2008). The concentrations of As in groundwater range, however, from undetectable to several thousand μg/L, with a survey of about 3,200 wells in Bangladesh by researchers from the United Kingdom (UK) and Bangladesh finding that As concentrations in about 27% of samples exceeded 50 μg/L, the Bangladeshi Drinking Water Standard (Smedley, 2008). In local areas, the percentage of affected wells was higher; in central Bangladesh, As in water from about 75% of 6000 wells exceeded 50 μg/L (van Geen et al., 2003). The sediments of Holocene age are micaceous sands, silts, and clays. Reduced, gray sediments of the upper aquifer, where As concentrations in groundwater are high, are underlain by brown, oxidized sediments where As concentrations in groundwater are low. In some places the two layers are separated by a thick clay layer (Harvey et al., 2002). The mineralogy of both layers, where the clay was absent, was found to be similar for part of the Bengal Basin near Dhaka, Bangladesh. Minerals included quartz, plagioclase and potassium feldspar, micas (biotite, muscovite, and phlogopite), chlorite, and amphibole; carbonaceous material was sparse. Trace amounts of siderite were present in the reduced sediments, but not in the deeper, oxidized sediments (Stollenwerk et al., 2007). In the shallow aquifer in West Bengal, organic carbon is present as petroleum-related compounds (Rowland et al., 2006).

to contain As up to 56.6 mg/kg and siderite that precipitated in sediments beneath a streambed

Arsenic in Groundwater: A Summary of Sources and the Biogeochemical and Hydrogeologic Factors Affecting…

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55354

95

Glauconite sands and clays of Pliocene and Miocene age, overlain by younger non-glauconitic sands, clays, thin coal beds and peats, are also present in the lowlands of xouth Sumatra, Indonesia. Arsenic concentrations exceeded the WHO guidelines in water from several wells completed in both the glauconitic formations and the younger sediments, with the higher concentrations found in water from the youngest (Holocene) sediments (Winkel et al., 2008). Glauconitic sediments are found on several continents (Barringer et al., 2010) and the recent findings in the Atlantic Coastal Plain and Sumatra indicate that these marine sediments, in addition to all the aquifers in other geologic settings, can now also be considered a potential

Oxidation of As-bearing sulfides has been proposed as a mechanism for releasing As from geologic materials (Smedley, 2008). Although originally proposed as a mechanism for As release from the alluvial sediments of West Bengal and Bangladesh, the presence of sulfide minerals in those aquifers is rare and appears limited to biogenic framboidal pyrite, and pyrite in woody peat, and on magnetite (Acharyya, 2002). Oxidation of sulfides in mined areas throughout the world is a well-known phenomenon that has led to high concentrations of As in soils, surface water and groundwater; examples of such occurrences include western Canada, the western USA, and the Bolivian Altiplano (Lopez et al., 2012; Moncur et al., 2005; Welch et al., 2000). Sulfide oxidation has also resulted in high As concentrations (up to 215 μg/ L) in groundwater in the eastern USA, in parts of the Piedmont rocks in Pennsylvania and New Jersey (Peters and Burkert, 2007; Serfes, 2005), where an As-oxidizing bacterium was involved in the mobilization of As (Rhine et al., 2008). A broad diversity of microorganisms oxidizes dissolved arsenic for different reasons including dissimilatory respiration, detoxifi‐

Because of the magnitude of the contamination in West Bengal and Bangladesh, these two regions have received substantial attention from the research community. In general, reductive dissolution of Fe hydroxides and release of sorbed As explains much of the observed mobili‐ zation of As from sediments to groundwater (e.g., Nickson et al., 2000; Zheng et al., 2004). Organic matter in the alluvial aquifers is likely an important component of the reduction process. Field and experimental studies have shown that metal-reducing microbes can enhance mobilization of As, and that oxidation of the organic matter drives the redox reactions whereby Fe hydroxides are reductively dissolved and sorbed As released (Islam et al., 2004; McArthur et al., 2004). Arsenic also is released from Mn oxides as they reductively dissolve, but may not remain in the groundwater, instead resorbing to Fe hydroxides (McArthur et al., 2004). Other

contained 184 mg/kg of As (Barringer et al., 2011; Mumford et al., 2012).

source of As-contaminated groundwater.

cation, and energy needs (Santini and Ward, 2012).

**3. Biogeochemical factors**

**3.1. Oxidation**

**3.2. Reduction**

In Cambodia, Vietnam, and Laos, As in young deltaic sediments of the Mekong and Red River basins has also contaminated groundwater, again exposing several million people to unheal‐ thylevelsofAs (> 1,000μg/Linsome cases)indrinkingwater(Agusa et al., 2006;Berget al., 2001; Chanpiwat etal.,2011;Hoangetal.,2010;Luuetal.,2009;Sthiannopkaoetal.,2008).Theaquifers are composed of quartz sands and clays that host Fe oxide and hydroxide phases, also possi‐ bly manganese (Mn) oxides, and organic matter is present. Siderite, pyrite, and orpiment are also found in sediments of the Mekong delta (Quicksall et al., 2008) and siderite, ilmenite, vivianite,gibbsiteandboehmitearereportedfortheRedRiverdeltasediments(Eicheetal.,2008).

In the Pannonian Basin of Hungary and Romania, Quaternary sediments of fluvial and eolian origin have contributed As to groundwater; the sediments are composed of sands and loess. Quartz, feldspar, carbonates (calcite and dolomite, muscovite, chlorite, clays, and humic substances are reported and fine particles of Fe hydroxides are indicated (Varsányi and Kovács, 2006). Other Fe-bearing minerals, from which As may be released, are reported to include goethite, limonite, pyrite, and siderite (Rowland et al., 2011).

Alluvial and lacustrine sediments in the Huhhot Basin of Inner Mongolia form two aquifers, separated by a clay confining layer; some boreholes completed in the deeper aquifer are artesian. The sediments are more fine-grained in the low-lying parts of the basin and it is in these sediments that reducing conditions are present and As concentration in groundwater are highest (1,500 μg/L). Organic matter is found in the aquifers and dissolved organic carbon concentrations in groundwater are high (Smedley et al., 2003).

The Atlantic Coastal Plain is located along the east coast of the USA. In addition to quartz-rich deposits of near-shore origin, the Coastal Plain is composed partly of sediments of marine origin that contain the mineral glauconite, the As contents of which are high (up to 130 mg/kg) in some formations (Dooley, 2001). In the state of Maryland, USA, in an aquifer composed of these marine sediments, As concentrations in groundwater exceed 10 μg/L and have been found as high as 80 μg/L (Pearcy et al, 2011). Farther north, in the state of New Jersey, As concentrations in water from an observation well in a glauconite-bearing aquifer were 110 μg/L (dePaul and Szabo, 2007), and water from several domestic wells in similar aquifers in the same region has exceeded the state MCL of 5 μg/L. In shallow groundwater discharging to New Jersey Coastal Plain streams underlain by the glauconitic sediments, As concentrations have exceeded the MCL, ranging as high as 89.2 μg/L. The sediments below the streambeds also contain other phyllosilicates (illite, smectites, muscovite, biotite, chlorite) and quartz. In addition to the glauconite sands, associated phosphorite deposits were found to contain As up to 56.6 mg/kg and siderite that precipitated in sediments beneath a streambed contained 184 mg/kg of As (Barringer et al., 2011; Mumford et al., 2012).

Glauconite sands and clays of Pliocene and Miocene age, overlain by younger non-glauconitic sands, clays, thin coal beds and peats, are also present in the lowlands of xouth Sumatra, Indonesia. Arsenic concentrations exceeded the WHO guidelines in water from several wells completed in both the glauconitic formations and the younger sediments, with the higher concentrations found in water from the youngest (Holocene) sediments (Winkel et al., 2008). Glauconitic sediments are found on several continents (Barringer et al., 2010) and the recent findings in the Atlantic Coastal Plain and Sumatra indicate that these marine sediments, in addition to all the aquifers in other geologic settings, can now also be considered a potential source of As-contaminated groundwater.

## **3. Biogeochemical factors**

## **3.1. Oxidation**

concentrations in groundwater are high, are underlain by brown, oxidized sediments where As concentrations in groundwater are low. In some places the two layers are separated by a thick clay layer (Harvey et al., 2002). The mineralogy of both layers, where the clay was absent, was found to be similar for part of the Bengal Basin near Dhaka, Bangladesh. Minerals included quartz, plagioclase and potassium feldspar, micas (biotite, muscovite, and phlogopite), chlorite, and amphibole; carbonaceous material was sparse. Trace amounts of siderite were present in the reduced sediments, but not in the deeper, oxidized sediments (Stollenwerk et al., 2007). In the shallow aquifer in West Bengal, organic carbon is present as petroleum-related

In Cambodia, Vietnam, and Laos, As in young deltaic sediments of the Mekong and Red River basins has also contaminated groundwater, again exposing several million people to unheal‐ thylevelsofAs (> 1,000μg/Linsome cases)indrinkingwater(Agusa et al., 2006;Berget al., 2001; Chanpiwat etal.,2011;Hoangetal.,2010;Luuetal.,2009;Sthiannopkaoetal.,2008).Theaquifers are composed of quartz sands and clays that host Fe oxide and hydroxide phases, also possi‐ bly manganese (Mn) oxides, and organic matter is present. Siderite, pyrite, and orpiment are also found in sediments of the Mekong delta (Quicksall et al., 2008) and siderite, ilmenite, vivianite,gibbsiteandboehmitearereportedfortheRedRiverdeltasediments(Eicheetal.,2008). In the Pannonian Basin of Hungary and Romania, Quaternary sediments of fluvial and eolian origin have contributed As to groundwater; the sediments are composed of sands and loess. Quartz, feldspar, carbonates (calcite and dolomite, muscovite, chlorite, clays, and humic substances are reported and fine particles of Fe hydroxides are indicated (Varsányi and Kovács, 2006). Other Fe-bearing minerals, from which As may be released, are reported to include

Alluvial and lacustrine sediments in the Huhhot Basin of Inner Mongolia form two aquifers, separated by a clay confining layer; some boreholes completed in the deeper aquifer are artesian. The sediments are more fine-grained in the low-lying parts of the basin and it is in these sediments that reducing conditions are present and As concentration in groundwater are highest (1,500 μg/L). Organic matter is found in the aquifers and dissolved organic carbon

The Atlantic Coastal Plain is located along the east coast of the USA. In addition to quartz-rich deposits of near-shore origin, the Coastal Plain is composed partly of sediments of marine origin that contain the mineral glauconite, the As contents of which are high (up to 130 mg/kg) in some formations (Dooley, 2001). In the state of Maryland, USA, in an aquifer composed of these marine sediments, As concentrations in groundwater exceed 10 μg/L and have been found as high as 80 μg/L (Pearcy et al, 2011). Farther north, in the state of New Jersey, As concentrations in water from an observation well in a glauconite-bearing aquifer were 110 μg/L (dePaul and Szabo, 2007), and water from several domestic wells in similar aquifers in the same region has exceeded the state MCL of 5 μg/L. In shallow groundwater discharging to New Jersey Coastal Plain streams underlain by the glauconitic sediments, As concentrations have exceeded the MCL, ranging as high as 89.2 μg/L. The sediments below the streambeds also contain other phyllosilicates (illite, smectites, muscovite, biotite, chlorite) and quartz. In addition to the glauconite sands, associated phosphorite deposits were found

compounds (Rowland et al., 2006).

goethite, limonite, pyrite, and siderite (Rowland et al., 2011).

94 Current Perspectives in Contaminant Hydrology and Water Resources Sustainability

concentrations in groundwater are high (Smedley et al., 2003).

Oxidation of As-bearing sulfides has been proposed as a mechanism for releasing As from geologic materials (Smedley, 2008). Although originally proposed as a mechanism for As release from the alluvial sediments of West Bengal and Bangladesh, the presence of sulfide minerals in those aquifers is rare and appears limited to biogenic framboidal pyrite, and pyrite in woody peat, and on magnetite (Acharyya, 2002). Oxidation of sulfides in mined areas throughout the world is a well-known phenomenon that has led to high concentrations of As in soils, surface water and groundwater; examples of such occurrences include western Canada, the western USA, and the Bolivian Altiplano (Lopez et al., 2012; Moncur et al., 2005; Welch et al., 2000). Sulfide oxidation has also resulted in high As concentrations (up to 215 μg/ L) in groundwater in the eastern USA, in parts of the Piedmont rocks in Pennsylvania and New Jersey (Peters and Burkert, 2007; Serfes, 2005), where an As-oxidizing bacterium was involved in the mobilization of As (Rhine et al., 2008). A broad diversity of microorganisms oxidizes dissolved arsenic for different reasons including dissimilatory respiration, detoxifi‐ cation, and energy needs (Santini and Ward, 2012).

## **3.2. Reduction**

Because of the magnitude of the contamination in West Bengal and Bangladesh, these two regions have received substantial attention from the research community. In general, reductive dissolution of Fe hydroxides and release of sorbed As explains much of the observed mobili‐ zation of As from sediments to groundwater (e.g., Nickson et al., 2000; Zheng et al., 2004). Organic matter in the alluvial aquifers is likely an important component of the reduction process. Field and experimental studies have shown that metal-reducing microbes can enhance mobilization of As, and that oxidation of the organic matter drives the redox reactions whereby Fe hydroxides are reductively dissolved and sorbed As released (Islam et al., 2004; McArthur et al., 2004). Arsenic also is released from Mn oxides as they reductively dissolve, but may not remain in the groundwater, instead resorbing to Fe hydroxides (McArthur et al., 2004). Other studies indicate that As could also be released from biotite into Bangladeshi groundwater (Hopf et al., 2001; Seddique et al., 2008).

was mobilized from apatite by the bacterium *Burkholderia fungorum*, which utilizes phosphorus from the apatite (Mailloux et al., 2009). There is apatite present in the sediments released from the Himalayas to the alluvial aquifers of South East Asia, and there are apatite-rich phosphorite beds in the glauconitic New Jersey Coastal Plain. In addition to reductive dissolution of iron hydroxides releasing sorbed As, arsenate reduction by As-respirers and other As-reducing bacteria, As may also be released by the mechanism suggested by Mailloux et al. (2009) in some

Arsenic in Groundwater: A Summary of Sources and the Biogeochemical and Hydrogeologic Factors Affecting…

Conditions that support microbial sulfate reduction are reported for the aquifers of the West Bengal, Mekong, and Red River deltas. Where such conditions exist, there is the potential for precipitation of sulfide minerals that could remove As as well as Fe from solution. Buschmann and Berg (2009) found As concentrations to be lower in groundwater from zones where sulfate

2-) and Fe reduction were occurring in the aquifers of the Bengal, Mekong, and Red River deltas. They suggest such conditions, which could result in precipitation of insoluble sulfides, are a control on As levels in groundwater. Some of the chemical reactions that likely affect As

10FeS2 + 30NO3 - + 20 H2O → 10 Fe(OH)3 + 15 N2 + 15 SO4 2-

4FeIIIOOH + CH2O + 7H2CO3 →4FeII + 8HCO3 + 6H2O Nriagu et al.

+ 2HAsO4 2- + 3H+ → CH3COO-

K2(Fe1-x,MgX)2Al6(Si4O10)3(OH)12(s) + 3/2 O2 (g)+ 6H<sup>+</sup> →K<sup>+</sup> +2xMg+2 (aq) + 6SiO2(aq) + 2(1-X).Fe(OH)3(s) + 3/2 Al4(Si4O10)

+ H2S Nriagu et al.,

+ 3H+ → As2S3 + 4H2O Ehrlich and

+ 2HAsO2 +

Welch et al., (2000)

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55354

97

Morin & Calas, (2006)

(2006)

(2007)

(2007)

Saltikov et al., (2003)

Newman(2009)

Chapelle and Knobel (1983)

**Reaction description Equation Reference**

Oxidation of arsenite H3AsO3 + ½ O2 (aq) →H2AsO4 - + H+ Morin & Calas,

2CH2O + SO4 2- → 2HCO<sup>3</sup> -

**Table 2.** Reactions involved in, or affecting, reduction, oxidation, and (or) precipitation of arsenic in water and

CH3-CHOH-COO-

2H2O + HCO3 -

2HAsO2 + 3HS-

(OH)8(s)

Oxidation of pyrite FeS2 + 15/4 O2 + 7/2 H2O → Fe (OH)3 + 2H2SO4

+ 5 H2SO4

Oxidation of arsenopyrite FeAsS(S) +11/4O2(aq) 3/2H2O (aq) →Fe2+(Aq) + SO<sup>4</sup> 2-(aq) + H3AsO3(aq)

aquifers.

(SO4

mobility are shown in Table 2.

Reductive dissolution of Fe hydroxides (release of sorbed arsenate not shown)

Reduction of sulfate, formation of

Oxidation of organic carbon (lactate)

Microbially mediated precipitation of

Incongruent dissolution of glauconite (with release of arsenic not shown)

and reduction of As(V)

sulfide

orpiment

sediments.

Reductive dissolution of Fe hydroxides has been proposed as a viable mechanism for As release in many other affected aquifers as well—for example, in Croatia, Inner Mongolia, northern China, and the eastern and southeastern USA (Barringer et al., 2010, Barringer et al., 2011; Guo et al., 2010; Haque et al., 2008; Mumford et al, 2012; Pearcy et al., 2011; Sharif et al., 2008; Ujevic et al., 2010; Xie et al, 2008). Although less intensely studied than Bengal Basin sediments, release of As from Fe oxides appears to be an important mechanism in the Inner Mongolian sediments (Smedley, 2008).

## **3.3. Microbially mediated reactions**

Giventhe similarities to the shallowaquifers inCambodia,Vietnam,Laos, andMyanmar,much of what has been found in West Bengal and Bangladesh may apply to the aquifers in those countries as well. A study of indigenous bacteria in Cambodian sediments indicated arsenicrespiring bacteria that reduce As(V) (arsenate) to As(III) (arsenite) were fueled by inputs of organic carbon (Lear et al., 2007), similar to findings for bacteria in West Bengal sediments. Additionally, results of experiments showed microbially mediated reduction of As(V), and Fe, andreleasefromminerals (clay,glauconitesands,oxidesandhydroxides)(Campbelletal.,2006; Dong et al., 2003; Hopf et al., 2009; Kostka et al., 1999; McLean et al., 2006; Pearcy et al., 2011), demonstrating the involvement of microbes in the reduction-oxidation (redox) reactions.

The bacteria involved in the reactions involve several groups. Iron-reducing bacteria of the genus *Geobacter* can reduce Fe in minerals such as hydroxides (Lloyd and Oremland, 2006), thus leading to dissolution of the hydroxides and sorbed As release. Geobacter bacteria have been investigated as As reducers; although *G. uraniumreducens* contains genes for As respira‐ tion, it was not conclusively shown to respire As, and *G. sulfurreducens* did not reduce As enzymatically (Islam et al., 2005; Lear et al., 2007). Bacteria known as dissimilatory arsenate respiring prokaryotes (DARPs) are identified as arsenic reducers, which means that As(V) serves as the terminal electron acceptor in dissimilatory reduction of arsenate. In the glauco‐ nitic sediments of the New Jersey Coastal Plain, USA, amplification of the arsenic respiratory reductase gene (*arrA*) followed by alignment and gene sequencing revealed clones with close (99%) similarity to *Alkaliphilus oremlandii* (CP000453) (formerly *Clostridium* species strain OhlLAs)—a known arsenate-respiring bacterium (Mumford et al., 2012). Also using molecular techniques, an arsenate-respiring proteobacterium *Sulfurospirillum* sp. strain NP4 was identi‐ fied by Lear et al. (2007) in Cambodian sediments. The bacterium *Desulfotomaculum auripig‐ mentum* reduces As(V) to As(III) as well as sulfate to sulfide, and precipitates orpiment (Newman et al. 1997; Ehrlich and Newman, 2009)

It should be noted, however, that not all microbial reduction of arsenate is the result of bacterial respiration. Many bacteria detoxify arsenate by reducing it to arsenite and expelling it (Oremland and Stolz, 2005) and, in some cases, by methylating and expelling it (Bentley and Chasteen, 2002). Presence of dimethylarsinate and monomethylarsonate in groundwater, as was found in shallow groundwater in glauconitic sediments of the New Jersey Coastal Plain, probably was indicative of such microbial activity (Mumford, et al., 2012). In experiments, As was mobilized from apatite by the bacterium *Burkholderia fungorum*, which utilizes phosphorus from the apatite (Mailloux et al., 2009). There is apatite present in the sediments released from the Himalayas to the alluvial aquifers of South East Asia, and there are apatite-rich phosphorite beds in the glauconitic New Jersey Coastal Plain. In addition to reductive dissolution of iron hydroxides releasing sorbed As, arsenate reduction by As-respirers and other As-reducing bacteria, As may also be released by the mechanism suggested by Mailloux et al. (2009) in some aquifers.

studies indicate that As could also be released from biotite into Bangladeshi groundwater

Reductive dissolution of Fe hydroxides has been proposed as a viable mechanism for As release in many other affected aquifers as well—for example, in Croatia, Inner Mongolia, northern China, and the eastern and southeastern USA (Barringer et al., 2010, Barringer et al., 2011; Guo et al., 2010; Haque et al., 2008; Mumford et al, 2012; Pearcy et al., 2011; Sharif et al., 2008; Ujevic et al., 2010; Xie et al, 2008). Although less intensely studied than Bengal Basin sediments, release of As from Fe oxides appears to be an important mechanism in the Inner Mongolian sediments

Giventhe similarities to the shallowaquifers inCambodia,Vietnam,Laos, andMyanmar,much of what has been found in West Bengal and Bangladesh may apply to the aquifers in those countries as well. A study of indigenous bacteria in Cambodian sediments indicated arsenicrespiring bacteria that reduce As(V) (arsenate) to As(III) (arsenite) were fueled by inputs of organic carbon (Lear et al., 2007), similar to findings for bacteria in West Bengal sediments. Additionally, results of experiments showed microbially mediated reduction of As(V), and Fe, andreleasefromminerals (clay,glauconitesands,oxidesandhydroxides)(Campbelletal.,2006; Dong et al., 2003; Hopf et al., 2009; Kostka et al., 1999; McLean et al., 2006; Pearcy et al., 2011), demonstrating the involvement of microbes in the reduction-oxidation (redox) reactions.

The bacteria involved in the reactions involve several groups. Iron-reducing bacteria of the genus *Geobacter* can reduce Fe in minerals such as hydroxides (Lloyd and Oremland, 2006), thus leading to dissolution of the hydroxides and sorbed As release. Geobacter bacteria have been investigated as As reducers; although *G. uraniumreducens* contains genes for As respira‐ tion, it was not conclusively shown to respire As, and *G. sulfurreducens* did not reduce As enzymatically (Islam et al., 2005; Lear et al., 2007). Bacteria known as dissimilatory arsenate respiring prokaryotes (DARPs) are identified as arsenic reducers, which means that As(V) serves as the terminal electron acceptor in dissimilatory reduction of arsenate. In the glauco‐ nitic sediments of the New Jersey Coastal Plain, USA, amplification of the arsenic respiratory reductase gene (*arrA*) followed by alignment and gene sequencing revealed clones with close (99%) similarity to *Alkaliphilus oremlandii* (CP000453) (formerly *Clostridium* species strain OhlLAs)—a known arsenate-respiring bacterium (Mumford et al., 2012). Also using molecular techniques, an arsenate-respiring proteobacterium *Sulfurospirillum* sp. strain NP4 was identi‐ fied by Lear et al. (2007) in Cambodian sediments. The bacterium *Desulfotomaculum auripig‐ mentum* reduces As(V) to As(III) as well as sulfate to sulfide, and precipitates orpiment

It should be noted, however, that not all microbial reduction of arsenate is the result of bacterial respiration. Many bacteria detoxify arsenate by reducing it to arsenite and expelling it (Oremland and Stolz, 2005) and, in some cases, by methylating and expelling it (Bentley and Chasteen, 2002). Presence of dimethylarsinate and monomethylarsonate in groundwater, as was found in shallow groundwater in glauconitic sediments of the New Jersey Coastal Plain, probably was indicative of such microbial activity (Mumford, et al., 2012). In experiments, As

(Hopf et al., 2001; Seddique et al., 2008).

96 Current Perspectives in Contaminant Hydrology and Water Resources Sustainability

**3.3. Microbially mediated reactions**

(Newman et al. 1997; Ehrlich and Newman, 2009)

(Smedley, 2008).

Conditions that support microbial sulfate reduction are reported for the aquifers of the West Bengal, Mekong, and Red River deltas. Where such conditions exist, there is the potential for precipitation of sulfide minerals that could remove As as well as Fe from solution. Buschmann and Berg (2009) found As concentrations to be lower in groundwater from zones where sulfate (SO4 2-) and Fe reduction were occurring in the aquifers of the Bengal, Mekong, and Red River deltas. They suggest such conditions, which could result in precipitation of insoluble sulfides, are a control on As levels in groundwater. Some of the chemical reactions that likely affect As mobility are shown in Table 2.


**Table 2.** Reactions involved in, or affecting, reduction, oxidation, and (or) precipitation of arsenic in water and sediments.

#### **3.4. Sources, sinks, electron donors, and competitive ions**

Aqueous sulfide was measured in As-rich groundwater discharging to a New Jersey Coastal Plain, USA, stream (Barringer et al., 2010), but sulfide minerals (pyrite) were rare or not present in cores of streambed sediments. Siderite (FeCO3) was found, however, more than a meter deep in the sediments and, judging from the As content (184 mg/kg), the siderite is an effective sink for As released to the shallow groundwater (Mumford et al, 2012). Siderite apparently forms when bacteria respire organic matter, creating bicarbonate (HCO3 - ), in an Fe-rich, reducing environment with circumneutral to alkaline pH (Fredrickson et al., 1998). Siderite is reported for parts of the Southeast Asian alluvial aquifers, and presumably acts as an As sink there as well, because Islam et al., (2005) found both arsenate (As(V)) and arsenite (As(III)) sorbed effectively to the siderite in their experiments. Jönsson and Sherman (2008), however, found that the binding of As(III) with siderite is weak. Clearly, however, siderite plays a role in removing one or both of the prevalent As species from solution. Whether siderite remains a permanent sink for As is not known; it would seem possible that biogeochemical conditions in an aquifer could change such that sorbed As would be released back into solution.

microbially mediated processes that lead to As release from geologic materials into ground‐

Arsenic in Groundwater: A Summary of Sources and the Biogeochemical and Hydrogeologic Factors Affecting…

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55354

99

Several biogeochemical processes that release As from geologic materials have been identified, as presented in the previous section. Smedley and Kinniburgh (2002) point out that whether released As remains at problematic levels in groundwater depends not only on whether there are biogeochemical reactions that retard the transport of As, but also upon the hydrologic and hydrogeologic properties of the aquifer, such as flow velocity and dispersion. If the kinetics of As release are slow, and groundwater residence time is short, then As concentrations may not increase to the point where groundwater would be considered contaminated. Conversely, if reactions that mobilize As are rapid and residence time is long, then As can accumulate in groundwater such that concentrations become hazardous—as seen in Bangladesh, for example. Eventually, if the biogeochemical conditions that lead to release and mobilization of As continue to be present (within a geologic timeframe), then the source could become

Natural fluctuations can affect the fate and transport of As within groundwater systems. Seasonal fluctuations in recharge could, during periods of high precipitation, bring dilution to shallow groundwater, but also transport surficially derived materials to the aquifer. As mentioned above, the transport of dissolved organic matter from agricultural land in the Bengal Delta has been suggested to fuel bacterial activity that releases As from the aquifer materials, and, in that region, seasonal (monsoon) rainfall has an important effect on recharge rates and the transmission of land-derived substances to depth in the aquifers. On a much smaller scale, As concentrations in shallow groundwater that discharges to Coastal Plain streams in New Jersey, USA, varies with season and hydrologic conditions. Increased recharge during springtime results in more diluted shallow groundwater and low As concentrations, whereas hot, dry weather results in decreased recharge and higher As concentrations. Where clay lenses underlie the stream channel shallow groundwater levels above the clay decline during warm, dry periods, and some stream segments may ultimately lose water to ground‐ water. Thus, in some stream segments seasonal hydrologic conditions control As-rich ground‐ water discharges to the stream. In other segments, As-rich groundwater may discharge on a relatively constant basis with higher concentrations of As being present during warm dry

Pumping-induced changes to hydraulic gradients can alter flow paths at regional and local scales and can lead to introduction of contaminants to otherwise potable water. For As-

water.

**4. Hydrogeologic factors**

**4.2. Seasonal changes in recharge**

weather (Barringer et al., 2010).

**4.3. Effects of pumping**

**4.1. Residence time**

exhausted.

In the microbial release of As from geologic materials to groundwater, the presence of organic matter is seen as a critical factor, as it is an electron donor that fuels microbial activity. Organic acids also may compete with As species, along with oxyanions such as phosphate, molybdate, sulfate, and silicate, for binding sites on solids (Wang and Mulligan, 2006b). Nevertheless, the main role of organic matter in As release appears to be that it provides the necessary substrate to bacterial communities for growth and activity—as part of the process in which it is oxidized by bacteria, the organic matter also may produce quinone-like moities that act as electron shuttles in the resulting redox reactions (Mladenov, et al., 2010).

In the studies of the biogeochemistry of the Southeast Asian aquifers, the source of the organic matter was a matter of controversy. Buried peat was suggested as the source (McArthur et al., 2004), whereas Harvey et al. (2002) indicated that young carbon from the land surface moved to depth by irrigation pumping accounted for the organic matter in the redox reactions. (It may be that both sources are operative in different places.) Rowland et al., (2006, 2007) found naturally occurring hydrocarbons in West Bengal and Cambodian aquifers that could promote the microbial activity involved in arsenic release. Héry et al., (2010) point out that very low organic carbon contents (i.e. ≤1%) in sediments is sufficient to stimulate the microbially mediated reactions that result in metal and arsenic reduction in the aquifers.

Organic matter can come from anthropogenic sources as well as natural sources. Barringer et al. (2010) indicated that the likely source of organic matter in the glauconitic system they studied came from wastewater discharged for many years from farming and other subsequent activities. The issue of whether anthropogenic inputs from agricultural practices have con‐ tributed organic matter to shallow groundwater in West Bengal and Bangladesh has received much debate (Farooq et al., 2010; Neumann et al., 2009; Sengupta et al., 2008) and it is not entirely resolved. It has been noted, however, at various contamination sites, that petroleum leaks, organic-rich leachates from landfills, as well as inputs of organic carbon for remediation purposes has led to mobilization of As (Hering et al., 2009). Thus it is clear that inputs of organic carbon from both natural and anthropogenic activities can supply electrons and stimulate the microbially mediated processes that lead to As release from geologic materials into ground‐ water.

## **4. Hydrogeologic factors**

## **4.1. Residence time**

**3.4. Sources, sinks, electron donors, and competitive ions**

98 Current Perspectives in Contaminant Hydrology and Water Resources Sustainability

Aqueous sulfide was measured in As-rich groundwater discharging to a New Jersey Coastal Plain, USA, stream (Barringer et al., 2010), but sulfide minerals (pyrite) were rare or not present in cores of streambed sediments. Siderite (FeCO3) was found, however, more than a meter deep in the sediments and, judging from the As content (184 mg/kg), the siderite is an effective sink for As released to the shallow groundwater (Mumford et al, 2012). Siderite apparently

reducing environment with circumneutral to alkaline pH (Fredrickson et al., 1998). Siderite is reported for parts of the Southeast Asian alluvial aquifers, and presumably acts as an As sink there as well, because Islam et al., (2005) found both arsenate (As(V)) and arsenite (As(III)) sorbed effectively to the siderite in their experiments. Jönsson and Sherman (2008), however, found that the binding of As(III) with siderite is weak. Clearly, however, siderite plays a role in removing one or both of the prevalent As species from solution. Whether siderite remains a permanent sink for As is not known; it would seem possible that biogeochemical conditions

in an aquifer could change such that sorbed As would be released back into solution.

shuttles in the resulting redox reactions (Mladenov, et al., 2010).

mediated reactions that result in metal and arsenic reduction in the aquifers.

In the microbial release of As from geologic materials to groundwater, the presence of organic matter is seen as a critical factor, as it is an electron donor that fuels microbial activity. Organic acids also may compete with As species, along with oxyanions such as phosphate, molybdate, sulfate, and silicate, for binding sites on solids (Wang and Mulligan, 2006b). Nevertheless, the main role of organic matter in As release appears to be that it provides the necessary substrate to bacterial communities for growth and activity—as part of the process in which it is oxidized by bacteria, the organic matter also may produce quinone-like moities that act as electron

In the studies of the biogeochemistry of the Southeast Asian aquifers, the source of the organic matter was a matter of controversy. Buried peat was suggested as the source (McArthur et al., 2004), whereas Harvey et al. (2002) indicated that young carbon from the land surface moved to depth by irrigation pumping accounted for the organic matter in the redox reactions. (It may be that both sources are operative in different places.) Rowland et al., (2006, 2007) found naturally occurring hydrocarbons in West Bengal and Cambodian aquifers that could promote the microbial activity involved in arsenic release. Héry et al., (2010) point out that very low organic carbon contents (i.e. ≤1%) in sediments is sufficient to stimulate the microbially

Organic matter can come from anthropogenic sources as well as natural sources. Barringer et al. (2010) indicated that the likely source of organic matter in the glauconitic system they studied came from wastewater discharged for many years from farming and other subsequent activities. The issue of whether anthropogenic inputs from agricultural practices have con‐ tributed organic matter to shallow groundwater in West Bengal and Bangladesh has received much debate (Farooq et al., 2010; Neumann et al., 2009; Sengupta et al., 2008) and it is not entirely resolved. It has been noted, however, at various contamination sites, that petroleum leaks, organic-rich leachates from landfills, as well as inputs of organic carbon for remediation purposes has led to mobilization of As (Hering et al., 2009). Thus it is clear that inputs of organic carbon from both natural and anthropogenic activities can supply electrons and stimulate the


), in an Fe-rich,

forms when bacteria respire organic matter, creating bicarbonate (HCO3

Several biogeochemical processes that release As from geologic materials have been identified, as presented in the previous section. Smedley and Kinniburgh (2002) point out that whether released As remains at problematic levels in groundwater depends not only on whether there are biogeochemical reactions that retard the transport of As, but also upon the hydrologic and hydrogeologic properties of the aquifer, such as flow velocity and dispersion. If the kinetics of As release are slow, and groundwater residence time is short, then As concentrations may not increase to the point where groundwater would be considered contaminated. Conversely, if reactions that mobilize As are rapid and residence time is long, then As can accumulate in groundwater such that concentrations become hazardous—as seen in Bangladesh, for example. Eventually, if the biogeochemical conditions that lead to release and mobilization of As continue to be present (within a geologic timeframe), then the source could become exhausted.

## **4.2. Seasonal changes in recharge**

Natural fluctuations can affect the fate and transport of As within groundwater systems. Seasonal fluctuations in recharge could, during periods of high precipitation, bring dilution to shallow groundwater, but also transport surficially derived materials to the aquifer. As mentioned above, the transport of dissolved organic matter from agricultural land in the Bengal Delta has been suggested to fuel bacterial activity that releases As from the aquifer materials, and, in that region, seasonal (monsoon) rainfall has an important effect on recharge rates and the transmission of land-derived substances to depth in the aquifers. On a much smaller scale, As concentrations in shallow groundwater that discharges to Coastal Plain streams in New Jersey, USA, varies with season and hydrologic conditions. Increased recharge during springtime results in more diluted shallow groundwater and low As concentrations, whereas hot, dry weather results in decreased recharge and higher As concentrations. Where clay lenses underlie the stream channel shallow groundwater levels above the clay decline during warm, dry periods, and some stream segments may ultimately lose water to ground‐ water. Thus, in some stream segments seasonal hydrologic conditions control As-rich ground‐ water discharges to the stream. In other segments, As-rich groundwater may discharge on a relatively constant basis with higher concentrations of As being present during warm dry weather (Barringer et al., 2010).

## **4.3. Effects of pumping**

Pumping-induced changes to hydraulic gradients can alter flow paths at regional and local scales and can lead to introduction of contaminants to otherwise potable water. For Ascontaminated well water in Bangladesh, the contamination is found in the shallower of two aquifers. Although water of the deeper aquifer is generally free of As contamination, the replacement of shallow tube wells with wells in the deep aquifer was thought to have the potential to transport contamination downward to low-As ground water (Ravenscroft et al, 2001; Harvey et al., 2002; van Geen et al., 2003).

Geogenic sources of As are numerous—within the various geologic materials, the most common occurrences of As appear to be in sulfides (mainly pyrite) and as sorbed species on Fe hydroxides, although As also appears within some silicate and carbonate rocks. The main processes involved in As release to groundwater are reduction of Fe hydroxides, reduction of As within minerals and as a sorbed species, competitive sorption with other oxyanions, and sulfide oxidation. Increasingly, studies show that these processes can be mediated by microbes.

Arsenic in Groundwater: A Summary of Sources and the Biogeochemical and Hydrogeologic Factors Affecting…

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55354

101

Although major geologic sources of arsenic include alluvial materials, mineralized sedimen‐ tary and metasedimentary rocks and volcanic rocks and related deposits, recent findings indicating that As also is released from glauconitic sediments suggests that not all geologic sources and conditions for the release of As to groundwater have yet been identified. Further, it is apparent from some studies that human activities can increase the rates and amounts of As mobilized and dissolved in groundwater through inputs of organic carbon, and from water withdrawals and other changes to natural hydrologic systems. Thus, while there are human efforts to mitigate the As contamination of drinking-water supplies, there are also human activities that exacerbate the problem. The more fully we understand how, when, and where As is mobilized from geologic materials, or from anthropogenic releases to the environment,

[1] Acharyya, S.K. (2002). Arsenic contamination in groundwater affecting major parts of southern West Bengal and parts of western Chhattisgarh: Source and mobilization

[2] Agusa, T., Kunito, T., Fujihara, J., Kubota, R., Minh, T.B., Trang, P.T.K., Iwata, H., Subramanian, A., Viet, P.H. & Tanabe, S. (2006). Contamination by arsenic and other trace elements in tube-well water and its risk assessment to humans in Hanoi, Viet‐

[3] Aiuppa, A., Avino, R., Caliro, S., Chiodini, G., D'Alessandro, W., Favara, R., Federi‐ co. C., Ginevra, C., Inguaggiato, S., Longo, M., Pegoraino, G. & Valenza, M. (2006). Mineral control of arsenic content in thermal waters from volcanic-hosted hydrother‐ mal systems: Insights from the island of Ischia and Phlegrean Fields (Campanian

the more effectively we can find solutions to this major contamination problem.

**Author details**

**References**

Julia L. Barringer and Pamela A. Reilly

process. *Current Science*, 82, 740-744.

nam. *Environmental Pollution,* 139, 95-106.

Volcanic Province, Italy). *Chemical Geology*, 229, 313-330.

U.S. Geological Survey, USA

Pumping also can result in changes in redox conditions along a flow path. As suggested by Peters and Blum (2003), anoxic water can be drawn upward to oxic zones near the wellhead, resulting in disequilibrium between As species. The converse is also possible—anoxic waters could be introduced by pumping to oxic zones such that Fe(III) in ferric hydroxides is reduced, hydroxides are dissolved, and sorbed As is released. Or, in cases where As is released under anoxic conditions, introduction of oxic water through pumping could slow or terminate the reaction. An example of pumping-induced changes in redox conditions is found at the individual borehole scale in eastern Wisconsin, USA. In a field experiment, longer periods between pumping episodes allowed longer periods of anoxia, which resulted in higher concentrations of As in groundwater (Ayotte et al., 2011). Pumping also could move constit‐ uents such as organic carbon from the surface to depth, where the carbon could stimulate microbially mediated redox reactions such as Fe reduction that leads to As release from aquifer materials. Pumping could also move higher pH water into a zone of lower pH water, creating an environment in which As sorbed to aquifer materials can desorb.

Flow rates at the individual borehole scale can also be sufficiently rapid that contact time between groundwater and aquifer material is minimized, and reactions releasing As may be relatively slow. Limited contact time is thought to be the explanation for lower dissolved constituents, including As, in water from wells with high yield compared with those with low yield and higher dissolved constituents in the Hungarian Pannonian Basin ( Varsányi and Kovács, 2006). Similar results are reported for a well in a sandstone aquifer in Wisconsin, USA, where reducing conditions developed with no pumping and As concentrations increased (indicating dissolution of Fe hydroxides and As release), whereas rapid well purging intro‐ duced oxic conditions to water near the well bore (Gotkowitz et al., 2004).

## **5. Conclusions**

Arsenic contamination of groundwater resources has been identified in many parts of the world. In some cases, as in geothermal fields, the impact of As on drinking-water supplies may not be great, but there are parts of the world where groundwater is a major drinking-water source for millions of people, many of which are in poverty and have limited ability to solve the problem of a contaminated water source. Since the discoveries of widespread groundwater contamination with As, considerable effort has been expended to find suitable, inexpensive methods for removing As. A discussion of those efforts, and the results, is beyond the scope of this chapter; the reader is directed to Feenstra et al. (2007) for an overview of As removal methods.

Geogenic sources of As are numerous—within the various geologic materials, the most common occurrences of As appear to be in sulfides (mainly pyrite) and as sorbed species on Fe hydroxides, although As also appears within some silicate and carbonate rocks. The main processes involved in As release to groundwater are reduction of Fe hydroxides, reduction of As within minerals and as a sorbed species, competitive sorption with other oxyanions, and sulfide oxidation. Increasingly, studies show that these processes can be mediated by microbes.

Although major geologic sources of arsenic include alluvial materials, mineralized sedimen‐ tary and metasedimentary rocks and volcanic rocks and related deposits, recent findings indicating that As also is released from glauconitic sediments suggests that not all geologic sources and conditions for the release of As to groundwater have yet been identified. Further, it is apparent from some studies that human activities can increase the rates and amounts of As mobilized and dissolved in groundwater through inputs of organic carbon, and from water withdrawals and other changes to natural hydrologic systems. Thus, while there are human efforts to mitigate the As contamination of drinking-water supplies, there are also human activities that exacerbate the problem. The more fully we understand how, when, and where As is mobilized from geologic materials, or from anthropogenic releases to the environment, the more effectively we can find solutions to this major contamination problem.

## **Author details**

contaminated well water in Bangladesh, the contamination is found in the shallower of two aquifers. Although water of the deeper aquifer is generally free of As contamination, the replacement of shallow tube wells with wells in the deep aquifer was thought to have the potential to transport contamination downward to low-As ground water (Ravenscroft et al,

Pumping also can result in changes in redox conditions along a flow path. As suggested by Peters and Blum (2003), anoxic water can be drawn upward to oxic zones near the wellhead, resulting in disequilibrium between As species. The converse is also possible—anoxic waters could be introduced by pumping to oxic zones such that Fe(III) in ferric hydroxides is reduced, hydroxides are dissolved, and sorbed As is released. Or, in cases where As is released under anoxic conditions, introduction of oxic water through pumping could slow or terminate the reaction. An example of pumping-induced changes in redox conditions is found at the individual borehole scale in eastern Wisconsin, USA. In a field experiment, longer periods between pumping episodes allowed longer periods of anoxia, which resulted in higher concentrations of As in groundwater (Ayotte et al., 2011). Pumping also could move constit‐ uents such as organic carbon from the surface to depth, where the carbon could stimulate microbially mediated redox reactions such as Fe reduction that leads to As release from aquifer materials. Pumping could also move higher pH water into a zone of lower pH water, creating

Flow rates at the individual borehole scale can also be sufficiently rapid that contact time between groundwater and aquifer material is minimized, and reactions releasing As may be relatively slow. Limited contact time is thought to be the explanation for lower dissolved constituents, including As, in water from wells with high yield compared with those with low yield and higher dissolved constituents in the Hungarian Pannonian Basin ( Varsányi and Kovács, 2006). Similar results are reported for a well in a sandstone aquifer in Wisconsin, USA, where reducing conditions developed with no pumping and As concentrations increased (indicating dissolution of Fe hydroxides and As release), whereas rapid well purging intro‐

Arsenic contamination of groundwater resources has been identified in many parts of the world. In some cases, as in geothermal fields, the impact of As on drinking-water supplies may not be great, but there are parts of the world where groundwater is a major drinking-water source for millions of people, many of which are in poverty and have limited ability to solve the problem of a contaminated water source. Since the discoveries of widespread groundwater contamination with As, considerable effort has been expended to find suitable, inexpensive methods for removing As. A discussion of those efforts, and the results, is beyond the scope of this chapter; the reader is directed to Feenstra et al. (2007) for an overview of As removal

2001; Harvey et al., 2002; van Geen et al., 2003).

100 Current Perspectives in Contaminant Hydrology and Water Resources Sustainability

an environment in which As sorbed to aquifer materials can desorb.

duced oxic conditions to water near the well bore (Gotkowitz et al., 2004).

**5. Conclusions**

methods.

Julia L. Barringer and Pamela A. Reilly

U.S. Geological Survey, USA

## **References**


[4] Appleyard, S.J., Angeloni, J., & Watkins, R. (2006). Arsenic-rich groundwater in an urban area experiencing drought and increasing population density, Perth, Australia. *Applied Geochemistry*, 21, 83-97.

[16] Barringer, J.L., Reilly, P.A., Eberl, D.D., Blum, A.E., Bonin, J.L., Rosman, R., Hirst, B., Alebus, M., Cenno, K., & Gorska, M. (2011). Arsenic in sediments, groundwater, and streamwater of a glauconitic Coastal Plain terrain, New Jersey, USA—Chemical "fin‐ gerprints" for geogenic and anthropogenic sources. *Applied Geochemistry*, 26, 763-776.

Arsenic in Groundwater: A Summary of Sources and the Biogeochemical and Hydrogeologic Factors Affecting…

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55354

103

[17] Barringer, J.L. Szabo, Z. & Barringer, T.H. (1998). Arsenic and metals in soils in the vicinity of the Imperial Oil Company Superfund site, Marlboro Township, Mon‐ mouth County, New Jersey. *U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Re‐*

[18] Baur, W.H. & Onishi, B-M.H. (1969). Arsenic. In *Handbook of geochemistry*, ed. K.H.

[19] Beaulieu, B.T. & Savage, K.S. (2005). Arsenate adsorption structures on aluminum oxide and phyllosilicate mineral surfaces in smelter-impacted soils. *Environmental*

[20] Bentley, R., & Chasteen,.G. (2002). Microbial methylation of metalloids, arsenic, anti‐ mony, and bismuth. *Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews*, 66, 250-271,

[21] Berg, M., Tran, H.C., Nguyen, T.C., Pham, H.V., Schertenleib, R. & Giger, W. (2001). Arsenic contamination of groundwater and drinking water in Vietnam: A human

[22] Bhattacharya, P., Mukherjee, A.B., Bundschuh, J., Zevenhoven, R. & Loeppert, R.H. (eds.) (2007). *Trace Metals and other Contaminants in the Environment*, Volume 9. Elsevi‐

[23] Bottomley, D.J. (1984). Origins of some arseniferous groundwaters in Nova Scotia

[24] Bowell, R.J., Morley, N.H. & Din, V.K. (1994). Arsenic speciation in soil porewaters

[25] Boyle, R.W. & Jonasson, I.R. (1973). The geochemistry of arsenic and its use as an in‐ dicator element in geochemical prospecting. *Journal of Geochemical Exploration*, 2,

[27] Brown, C.J. & Chute, S.K. (2002). Arsenic in bedrock wells in Connecticut. (Abstract). *Arsenic in New England: A Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference*, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Superfund Basic Research Program, Manchester,

[28] Brown, K.L., & Simmons, S.F. (2003). Precious metals in high-temperature geother‐

health threat. *Environmental Science and Technology*, 35, 2621-2626.

and New Brunswick, Canada. *Journal of Hydrology*, 69, 223-257.

from the Ashanti Mine, Ghana. *Applied Geochemistry*, 9, 15-22.

mal systems in New Zealand. *Geothermics*, 32, 619-625.

[26] Brooks, W.E. (2008). Arsenic. *2007 Minerals Yearbook, U.S. Geological Survey*.

Wedepohl, 33-A-1-33-0-5. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.

*Science and Technology,* 39, 3571-3579.

New Hampshire, May 29-31, 2002.

*port 98-4016.*

er BV.

251-296.


[16] Barringer, J.L., Reilly, P.A., Eberl, D.D., Blum, A.E., Bonin, J.L., Rosman, R., Hirst, B., Alebus, M., Cenno, K., & Gorska, M. (2011). Arsenic in sediments, groundwater, and streamwater of a glauconitic Coastal Plain terrain, New Jersey, USA—Chemical "fin‐ gerprints" for geogenic and anthropogenic sources. *Applied Geochemistry*, 26, 763-776.

[4] Appleyard, S.J., Angeloni, J., & Watkins, R. (2006). Arsenic-rich groundwater in an urban area experiencing drought and increasing population density, Perth, Australia.

N-Iceland: processes controlling its mobility. *Applied Geochemistry,* 18, 1297-1312. [6] ATSDR (2000). Toxicological profile for arsenic. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Public Health Service Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry,

[7] Ayotte, J.D., Montgomery, D.L., Flangan, S.M., & Robinson, K.W. (2003). Arsenic in groundwater in Eastern New England: occurrence, controls, and human health im‐

[8] Ayotte, J.D., Neilson, M.G., Robinson, G.R., & Moore, R.B. (1999). Relation of arsenic, iron, and manganese in ground water to aquifer type, bedrock lithogeochemistry, and land use in the New England Coastal Basins. *U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resour‐*

[9] Ayotte, J.D., Szabo, Z., Focazio, M.J. & Eberts, S.M. (2011). Effects of human-induced alteration of groundwater flow on concentrations of naturally-occurring trace ele‐

[10] Ball, A.L., Rom, W.N. & Glenne, B. (1983). Arsenic distribution in soils surrounding the Utah copper smelter. *American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal*, 44, 341-348.

[11] Ball, J.W., McCleskey, R.B., Nordstrom, D.K., Holloway, J.M., Verplank, P.L. & Stur‐ tevant, S.A. (2002). Water chemistry data for selected springs, geysers, and streams in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, 1999-2000. *U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Re‐*

[12] Ball, J.W. Nordstrom, D.K., Jenne, E.A. & Vivit, D.V. (1998). Chemical analyses of hot springs, pools, geysers, and surface waters of Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming

[13] Barringer, J.L., Barringer, T.H., Lacombe, P.J. & Holmes, C.W. (2001). Arsenic in soils and sediment adjacent to Birch Swamp Brook in the vicinity of Texas road (down‐ stream from the Imperial Oil Company Superfund Site)), Monmouth County, New

[14] Barringer, J.L., Bonin, J.L., Deluca, M.J., Romaga, T., Cenno, K., Alebus, M., Kratzer, T. & Hirst B. (2007). Sources and temporal dynamics of arsenic in a New Jersey wa‐

[15] Barringer, J.L., Mumford, A, Young, L.Y., Reilly, P.A., Bonin, J.L. & Rosman, R. (2010). Pathways for arsenic from sediments to groundwater to streams: Biogeo‐ chemical processes in the Inner Coastal Plain, New Jersey, USA. *Water Research*, 44,

and vicinity, 1972-1975. *U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 98-182*.

Jersey. *U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4185.*

tershed, USA. *Science of the Environment*, 379, 56-74.

plications. *Environmental Science and Technology*, 37, 2075-2083.

ments at water-supply wells. *Applied Geochemistry*, 26, 747-762.

C ground waters in a basaltic area,

*Applied Geochemistry*, 21, 83-97.

*ces Investigations Report 99-4162.*

*port 2002-382*.

5532-5544.

428.

[5] Arnórsson, S. (2003). Arsenic in surface-and in 90°

102 Current Perspectives in Contaminant Hydrology and Water Resources Sustainability


[29] Brunt, R., Vasak, L.,& Griffioen, J. (2004). Arsenic in groundwater: Probability of oc‐ currence of excessive concentration on a global scale. *International Groundwater Re‐ sources Assessment Centre: Report nr. SP 2004-1*.

[40] Chen, S-L., Dzeng, S.R., Yang, M-H., Chiu, K-H., Shieh, G-M., Wai, C.M. (1994). Ar‐ senic species in groundwaters of the Blackfoot Disease Area, Taiwan. *Environmental*

Arsenic in Groundwater: A Summary of Sources and the Biogeochemical and Hydrogeologic Factors Affecting…

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55354

105

[41] Cravotta, C.A., III. (2008). Dissolved metals and associated constituents in aban‐ doned coal-mine drainages, Pennsylvania, USA: Part I. Constituent quantities and

[42] Cullen, W.R. (2008). Is Arsenic an Aphrodisiac? The Sociochemistry of an Element,

[43] Daniele, L. (2004). Distribution of arsenic and other minor trace elements in the groundwater of Ischia Island (southern Italy). *Environmental Geology*, 46, 96-103.

[44] Dangic, A. (2007). Arsenic in surface- and groundwater in central parts of the Balkan Peninsula (SE Europe), Chapter 5,127-156. In *Trace Metals and other Contaminants in the Environment, Volume 9*. Ed. P. Bhattacharya,, A.B. Mukherjee, J. Bundschuh, R. Ze‐

[45] Davenport, J.R. & Peryea, F.J. (1991). Phosphate fertilizers influence leaching of lead and arsenic in a soil contaminated with lead arsenate. *Water, Air, and Soil Pollution*,

[46] DePaul, V.T. & Szabo, Z. (2007). Occurrence of radium-224, radium-226, and radi‐ um-228 in water from the Vincentown and Wenonah-Mt. Laurel aquifers, the Eng‐ lishtown aquifer system, and the Hornerstown and Red Bank Sands. *U.S. Geological*

[47] Dong, H. Kukkadapu, R.K., Fredrickson, J.K., Zachara, J.M., Kennedy, D.W. & Kosta‐ nadrithes, H. (2003). Microbial reduction of structural Fe(III) in illite and goethite. *En‐*

[48] Dooley, J.H. (2001). Baseline concentrations of arsenic, beryllium, and associated ele‐ ments in glauconite and glauconitic soils in the New Jersey Coastal Plain. N*.J. Geolog‐ ical Survey Investigation Report*. Trenton, NJ, N.J. Department of Environmental

[49] Drummond, D.D., & Bolton, D.W. (2010). Arsenic in ground water in the Coastal Plain aquifers of Maryland. *Report of Investigations No. 78. Department of Natural Re‐ sources, DNR 12-4282010-450*. Resource Assessment Service, Maryland Geological

[50] Durant, J.L., Ivushkina, T., MacLaughlin, K., Lukacs, H., Gawel, J, Senn, D. & He‐ mond, H.F. (2004). Elevated levels of arsenic in the sediments of an urban pond:

[51] Ehrlich, H.L. & Newman, D.K. (2009). Geomicrobiology, Fifth ed., Boca Raton, FL,

sources, distribution and water quality impacts. *Water Research*, 38, 2989-3000.

*Science and Technol.ogy*, 28, 877-881.

Cambridge, UK, RSC Publishing.

venhoven, & R.H. Loeppert. Elsevier BV.

*Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2007-5064*.

*vironmental Science and Technology*, 37, 1268-1276.

57-58, 101-110.

Protection..

CRC Press

Survey, Baltimore MD.

correlations. *Applied Geochemistry*, 23, 166-202.


[40] Chen, S-L., Dzeng, S.R., Yang, M-H., Chiu, K-H., Shieh, G-M., Wai, C.M. (1994). Ar‐ senic species in groundwaters of the Blackfoot Disease Area, Taiwan. *Environmental Science and Technol.ogy*, 28, 877-881.

[29] Brunt, R., Vasak, L.,& Griffioen, J. (2004). Arsenic in groundwater: Probability of oc‐ currence of excessive concentration on a global scale. *International Groundwater Re‐*

[30] Bundschuh, J., Litter, M.I., Parvez, F., Román-Ross, G., Nicolli, H.B., Jean, J-S., Liu, C-W., López, D., Armienta, M.A., Guilherme, L.R.G., Cuevas, A.G., Cornejo, L., Cum‐ bal, L., Toujaguez, R. (2012). One century of arsenic exposure in Latin America: a review of history and occurrence from 14 countries. *Science of the Total Environment*,

[31] Burkel, R.S., & Stoll, R.C. (1999). Naturally occurring arsenic in sandstone aquifer water supply wells of Northeastern Wisconsin. *Ground Water Monitoring and Remedia‐*

[32] Buschmann, J., & Berg, M. (2009). Impact of sulfate reduction on the scale of arsenic contaminations in groundwater of the Mekong, Bengal, and Red River deltas. *Applied*

[33] Camm, G.. Glass, H.J., Bryce, D.W. & Butcher, A.R. (2004). Characterization of a min‐ ing-related arsenic-contaminated site, Cornwall, UK. *Journal of Geochemical Explora‐*

[34] Campbell, K.M., Malasarn, D. Saltikov, C., Newman, D.K. & Hering, J.G. (2006). Si‐ multaneous microbial reduction of iron (II) and arsenic (V) in suspensions of hy‐

[35] Cancès. B., Juillot, F., Morin, G., Laperche, V., Polya, D., Vaughn, D.J., Hazeman, J.-L, Proux, O., Brown, G.E., Jr. & Calas, G. (2008). Changes in arsenic speciation through a contaminated soil profile: an XAS based study. *Science of the Total Environment*, 397,

[36] Carrillo-Chávez, A., Drever, J.I. & Martinez, M. (2000). Arsenic content and ground‐ water geochemistry of the San Antonio-El Triunfo, Carrizal and Los Planes aquifers

in southernmost Baja California, Mexico. *Environmental Geology*, 39, 1295-1303.

[37] Carpenter, R., Peterson, M.L. & Jahnke, R.A. (1978). Sources, sinks, and cycling of ar‐ senic in the Puget Sound Region. In *Estuarine Interactions* ed. M.L. Wiley. New York,

[38] Chanpiwat, P., Sthiannopkao, S., Cho, K.H., Kim, K-W, San, V., Suvathong, B. & Vongthavady, C. (2011). Contamination by arsenic and other trace elements of tubewell waters along the Mekong River in Lao PDR. *Environmental Pollution*, 159,

[39] Chapelle, F.H. & Knobel, L.L. (1983). Aqueous geochemistry and the exchangeable cation composition of glauconite in the Aquia aquifer, Maryland. *Ground Water*, 21,

drous ferric oxide. *Environmental Science and Technology*, 40, 5950-5955.

*sources Assessment Centre: Report nr. SP 2004-1*.

104 Current Perspectives in Contaminant Hydrology and Water Resources Sustainability

429, 2-35.

*tion*, 19, 114-121.

*tion*, 82, 1-15.

178-189.

Academic Press.

567-576.

343-352.

*Geochemistry*, 24, 1278-1286.


[52] Eiche, E., Neumann, T., Berg, M., Weinman, B., van Geen, A., Norra, S., Berner, Z., Trang, P.T.K., Viet, P.H. & Stüben, D. (2008). Geochemical processes underlying a sharp contrast in groundwater arsenic concentrations in a village on the Red River delta, Vietnam. *Applied Geochemistry*, 23, 3143-3154.

[63] Gurung, J., Ishiga, H. & Khadka, M.S. (2005). Geological and geochemical examina‐ tion of arsenic contamination of groundwater in the Holocene Terai basin, Nepal. *En‐*

Arsenic in Groundwater: A Summary of Sources and the Biogeochemical and Hydrogeologic Factors Affecting…

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55354

107

[64] Gurzau, A.E., and Pop, C. (2012). A new public health issue: Contamination with ar‐ senic of private water sources. *Proceedings of the AERAPA Conference*. Available from

[65] Haack, S.K., & Rachol, C.M. (2000). Arsenic in groundwater in Washtenaw County,

[66] Haeri, A., Strelbitskaya, S., Porkhial, S., & Ashayeri, A. (2011). Distribution of arsenic in geothermal waters from Sabalan geothermal field, N-W Iran. *Proceedings 36th Work‐ shop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Standford University, Stanford, California, Janu‐*

[67] Haque, S., Ji, J. & Johannesson, K.H. (2008). Evaluating mobilization and transport of arsenic in sediments and groundwaters of the Aquia aquifer, Maryland, USA. *Journal*

[68] Harvey, C.F., Swartz, C.H., Badruzzaman, A.B.M., Keon-Blute, N., Yu, W., Ali, M.A.l, Jay, J., Beckie, R., Niedan, V., Brabander, D., Oates, R.M., Ashfaque, K.N., Islam, S., Hemond, H.F. & Ahmed, M.F. (2002). Arsenic mobility and groundwater extraction

[69] Heinrichs, G. & Udluft, P. (1999). Natural arsenic in Triassic rocks: a source of drink‐ ing-water contamination in Bavaria, Germany. *Hydrogeology Journal*, 7, 468-476.

[70] Hemond, H.F. (1995). Movement and distribution of arsenic in the Aberjona water‐

[71] Hering, J.G., O'Day, P., Ford, R.G., He, Y.T., Bilgin, A., Reisinger, H.J. & Burns, D.R. (2009). MNA as a remedy for arsenic mobilized by anthropogenic inputs of organic

[72] Héry, M., van Dongen, B.E., Gill, F., Mondal, D., Baughan, D.J., Pancoast, R.D., Polya, D.A. & Lloyd, J.R. (2010). Arsenic release and attenuation in low organic carbon aqui‐

[73] Hileman, B. (2007). Arsenic in chicken production. *Chemical Engineering News*, 85,

[74] Hoang, T.H., Bang, S., Kim, K-W, Nguyen, M.H. & Dang, D.M. (2010). Arsenic in groundwater and sediment in the Mekong River delta, Vietnam. *Environmental Pollu‐*

[75] Hopf, J., Langenhorst, F., Pollok, K., Merten, D. & Kothe E. (2009). Influence of organ‐ isms on biotite dissolution: an experimental approach. *Chemie der Erde*, 69, 45-56.

shed. *Environmental Health Perspectives, Supplement 1*, 103, 35-40.

carbon. *Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation,* 29, 84-92.

fer sediments from West Bengal. *Geobiology*, 8, 155-168..

aerapa.conference.ubbcluj.ro/2012/Gurzau.htm, accessed 7/6/12.

Michigan. *U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet FS 134-00.*

*vironmental Geology*, 49, 98-113.

*ary 31-February 2, 2011.*

34-35.

*tion*, 158, 2648-2658.

*of Contaminant Hydrology,* 99, 68-84.

in Bangladesh. *Science*, 298, 1602-1606.


[63] Gurung, J., Ishiga, H. & Khadka, M.S. (2005). Geological and geochemical examina‐ tion of arsenic contamination of groundwater in the Holocene Terai basin, Nepal. *En‐ vironmental Geology*, 49, 98-113.

[52] Eiche, E., Neumann, T., Berg, M., Weinman, B., van Geen, A., Norra, S., Berner, Z., Trang, P.T.K., Viet, P.H. & Stüben, D. (2008). Geochemical processes underlying a sharp contrast in groundwater arsenic concentrations in a village on the Red River

[53] Farooq, S.H., Chandrasekharam, D., Berner, Z., Norra, S. & Stüben, D. (2010). Influ‐ ence of traditional agricultural practices on mobilization of arsenic from sediments to

[54] Feenstra, L., van Erkel, J. & Vasak, L. (2007). Arsenic in groundwater: Overview and evaluation of removal methods. *IGRAC Report nr.SP 2007-2*. Utrecht, International

[55] Foley, N.K., Ayuso, R.A., Ayotte, J.D., Marvinney, R.G., Reeve, A.S. & Robinson, G.R., Jr. (2002). Mineralogical pathways for arsenic in weathering meta-shales: An analysis of regional and site studies in the northern Appalachians. (Abstract). *Arsenic in New England: A Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference*, National Institute of Environ‐ mental Health Sciences, Superfund Basic Research Program, Manchester, New

[56] Fredrickson, J.K., Zachara, J.M., Kennedy, D.W., Dong. H., Onstott, T.C., Hinman, N.W. & Li, S.M. (1998). Biogenic iron mineralization accompanying the dissimilatory reduction of hydrous ferric oxide by a groundwater bacterium, *Geochimica et Cosmo‐*

[57] Goldberg, S., & Glaubig, R.A. (1988). Anion sorption on a calcareous, montmorillo‐

[58] Gómez, J.J., Lillo, J. & Sahún, B. (2006). Naturally occurring arsenic in groundwater and identification of the geochemical sources in the Duero Cenozoic Basin, Spain. *En‐*

[59] Gotkowitz, M.B., Schreiber, M.E., & Simo, J.A. (2004). Effects of water use on arsenic

[60] Gunduz, O. & Simsek, C. (2008). Mechanisms of arsenic contamination of a surficial aquifer in Turkey. *GQ07: Securing Groundwater Quality in Urban and Industrial Envi‐ ronments (Proceedings of the 6th International Groundwater Quality Conference, Freeman‐*

[61] Gunduz, O., Simsek, C. & Hasozbek, A. (2010). Arsenic pollution in the groundwater of Simav Plain, Turkey: Its impact on water quality and human health. *Water, Air,*

[62] Guo, H., Zhang, B., Wang, G. & Shen, Z. (2010). Geochemical controls on arsenic and rare earth elements approximately along a groundwater flow path in the shallow

aquifer of the Hetao Basin, Inner Mongolia. *Chemical Geology*, 270, 117-125.

nitic soil—Arsenic. *Soil Science Society of America Journal*, 52, 1297-1300.

release to well water in a confined aquifer. *Ground Water,* 42, 568-575.

*tle, Australia, 2-7 December 2007, IAHS publ. no. XXX, 2008.*

delta, Vietnam. *Applied Geochemistry*, 23, 3143-3154.

106 Current Perspectives in Contaminant Hydrology and Water Resources Sustainability

Groundwater Resources Assessment Centre.

Hampshire, May 29-31, 2002.

*chimica Acta*, 62, 3239-3257.

*vironmental Geology*, 50, 1151-1170.

*and Soil Pollution*, 205, 43-62.

groundwater in Bengal delta. *Water Research*, 44, 5575-5588.


[76] Islam, F.S., Gault, A.G., Boothman, C., Polya, D.A., Charnock, J.M., Chatterjee, D. & Lloyd, J.R. (2004). Role of metal-reducing bacteria in arsenic release from Bengal del‐ ta sediments. *Nature*, 430, 68-71.

*Proc. 6th International Groundwater Quality Conference,* Freemantle, Western Australia,

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55354

109

Arsenic in Groundwater: A Summary of Sources and the Biogeochemical and Hydrogeologic Factors Affecting…

[87] Lear, G., Song B., Gault, A.G., Polya, D.A. & Lloyd, J.R. (2007). Molecular analysis of arsenate reducing bacteria within Cambodian sediments following amendment with

[88] Lloyd, J.R. & Oremland, R.S. (2006). Microbial transformations of arsenic in the envi‐

[89] Lopez, D.L., Bundschuh, J., Birkle, P., Armienta, M.A., Cumbal, L., Sracek, O., Corne‐ jo, L. & Ormachea, M. (2012). Arsenic in volcanic geothermal fluids of Latin America.

[90] Luu, T.T.G., Sthiannopkao, S. & Kim, K-W. (2009). Arsenic and other trace elements contamination in groundwater and a risk assessment study for the residents of the

[91] Mailloux, B.J., Aleandrova, E., Keimowitz, A.R., Wovkulich, K.,Freyer, G.A., Herron, M., Stolz, J.F., Kenna, T.C., Pichler, T., Polizzotto, M.L., Dong, H., Bishop, M. & Knappett, P.S.K (2009). Microbial mineral weathering for nutrient acquisition releas‐

[92] Mandal, B.K., & Suzuki, K.T., 2002. Arsenic round the world: a Review. *Talanta,* 58,

[93] Manning, B.A. & Goldberg, S. (1996). Modeling competitive adsorption of arsenate with phosphate and molybdate on oxide minerals. *Soil Science Society of America Jour‐*

[94] Martin, A.J. & Pedersen, T.F. (2002). The seasonal and interannual mobility of arsenic in a mine-impacted lake. *Environmental Science and Technology,* 36, 1516-1523.

[95] Matschullat, J. (2000). Arsenic in the geosphere—a review. *Science of the Total Environ‐*

[96] McArthur, J.M., Banergee, D.M., Hudson-Edwards, K.A., Mishra, R., Purohit, R., Ravenscroft, P., Cronin, A., Howarth, R.J., Chatterjee, A., Talukder, T., Lowry, D., Houghton, S.M & Chadha, D.K. (2004). Natural organic matter in sedimentary basins and its relation to arsenic in anoxic ground water: the example of West Bengal and its

[97] McCarthy, K.T., Pichler, T. & Price, R.E. (2005). Geochemistry of Champagne Hot Springs shallow hydrothermal vent field and associated sediments, Dominica, Less

[98] McClintock, T.R., Chen, Y., Bundschuh, J., Oliver, J.T., Navoni, J., Olmos, V., Lepori, E.V., Ahsan, H., Parvez, F. (2012). Arsenic exposure in Latin America: Biomarkers, risk assessments and related health effects. *Science of the Total Environment*, 429, 76-91.

Kandal Province of Cambodia. *Environment International,* 35, 455-460.

es arsenic. *Applied and Environmental Microbiology,* 75, 2558-2565.

worldwide implications. *Applied Geochemistry,* 19, 1255-1293.

Antilles. *Chemical Geology*, 224, 55-68.

acetate. *Applied and Environmental Microbiology,* 73, 1041-1048.

ronment: From soda lakes to aquifers. *Elements,* 2, 85-90.

*Science of the Total Environment*, 429, 57-75.

2-7 December 2007.

201-235.

*nal*, 60, 121-131.

*ment*, 249, 297-312.


*Proc. 6th International Groundwater Quality Conference,* Freemantle, Western Australia, 2-7 December 2007.

[87] Lear, G., Song B., Gault, A.G., Polya, D.A. & Lloyd, J.R. (2007). Molecular analysis of arsenate reducing bacteria within Cambodian sediments following amendment with acetate. *Applied and Environmental Microbiology,* 73, 1041-1048.

[76] Islam, F.S., Gault, A.G., Boothman, C., Polya, D.A., Charnock, J.M., Chatterjee, D. & Lloyd, J.R. (2004). Role of metal-reducing bacteria in arsenic release from Bengal del‐

[77] Islam, F.S., Pederick, R.L., Gault, A.G., Adams, L.K., Polya, D.A., Charnock, J.M. & Lloyd, J.R. (2005). Interactions between the Fe(III)-reducing bacterium *Geobacter sul‐ furreducens* and arsenate, and capture of the metalloid by biogenic Fe(II). *Applied and*

[78] Jönsson, J. & Sherman, D.M. (2008). Sorption of As(III) and As(V) to siderite, green rust (fougerite) and magnetite: implications for arsenic release in anoxic groundwa‐

[79] Kahn, B.I., Solo-Gabriele, H.M., Townsend, T.G. & Cai, Y. (2006). Release of arsenic to the environment from CCA-treated wood: 1. Leaching and speciation during service.

[80] Karczewska, A., Bogda, A. & Kryasiak, A. (2007). Arsenic in soils in areas of former mining and mineral processing in Lower Silesia, southwestern Poland, Chapter 16, 411-440. In *Trace Metals and other Contaminants in the Environment, Volume 9.* Ed. P. Bhattacharya, A.B. Mukherjee, J. Bundschuh, R. Zevenhoven & R.H. Loeppert. Elsev‐

[81] Karydakis, G., Arvanitis, A., Andritsos, N. & Fytikas, M. (2005). Low enthalpy geo‐ thermal fields in the Strymon Basin (Northern Greece). *Proceedings World Geothermal*

[82] Kinniburgh, D.G., Newell, A.J., Davies, J., Smedley, P.L., Milodowski, A.E., Ingram, J.A. & Merrin, P.D. (2006). The arsenic concentrations on groundwater from the Ab‐ bey Arms Wood observation borehole, Delamere, Cheshire, UK. 265-284. In *Fluid flow and solute movement in sandstone: the onshore UK Permo-Triassic redbed sequence. Ed. R.D.* Barker & J.H. Tellam. London, Geological Society of London, Special Publica‐

[83] Kobayashi, D.S. & Lee, G.F. (1978). Accumulation of arsenic in sediments of lakes treated with sodium arsenite. *Environmental Science and Technology*, 12, 1195-2000. [84] Kolker, A., Palmer, C.A., Bragg, L.J. & Bunnell, J.E. (2006). Arsenic in Coal. *U.S. Geo‐*

[85] Kostka, J.E., Haefele, E., Viehweger, R. & Stucki, J.W. (1999). Respiration and dissolu‐ tion of iron (III)-containing clay minerals by bacteria. *Environmental Science and Tech‐*

[86] Krüger, T., Holländer, H.M., Boochs, P-W., Billib, M., Stummeyer, J., Harazim, B. (2007). *In situ* remediation of arsenic at a highly contaminated site in Northern Ger‐ many. GQ07 Securing groundwater quality in urban and industrial environments,

ta sediments. *Nature*, 430, 68-71.

*Environmental Microbiology*, 71, 8642-8648.

108 Current Perspectives in Contaminant Hydrology and Water Resources Sustainability

*Environmental Science and Technology*, 40, 988-993.

*Congress 2005,* Antalya, Turkey, 24-29 April 2005.

*logical Survey Fact Sheet FS 2005-3152*.

*nology*, 33, 3127-3133.

ters. *Chemical Geology*, 255, 173-181.

ier BV.

tion 263.


[99] McLean, J.E., DuPont, R.R. & Sorensen, D.L. (2006). Iron and arsenic release from aquifer solids in response to biostimulation. *Journal of Environmental Quality*. 35, 1193-1203.

[111] Neumann, R.B., Ashfaque, K.N., Badruzzaman, A.B.M, Ali, M.A., Shoemaker, J.K & Harvey, C.F. (2009). Anthropogenic influences on groundwater arsenic concentra‐

Arsenic in Groundwater: A Summary of Sources and the Biogeochemical and Hydrogeologic Factors Affecting…

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55354

111

[112] Newman, D.K., Beveridge, T.J. & Morel, F.M. (1997). Precipitation of arsenic trisul‐ fide by *Desulfotomaculum auripigmentum*. *Applied and Environmental Microbiology*, 63,

[113] Ng, J.C., Wang J., Shraim, A. (2003). A global health problem caused by arsenic from

[114] NHMRC (1996). National Health and Medical Research Council. Australian drinking

[115] Nickson, R.T, McArthur, J.M., Ravenscroft, P., Burgess, W.G. & Ahmed, K.M. (2000). Mechanism of arsenic release to groundwater, Bangladesh and West Bengal. *Applied*

[116] Nickson, R.T, McArthur, J.M., Shrestha, B., Kyaw-Myint, T.O., Lowry, D. (2005). Ar‐ senic and other drinking water quality issues, Muzaffargarh District, Pakistan. *Ap‐*

[117] Nicolli, H.B., Bundschuh, J., Blanco, M, del, C., Tujchneider, O.C., Panarello, H.O., Dapeña, C., Rusnasky, J.E. (2012). Arsenic and associated trace-elements in ground‐ water from the Chaco-Pampean plain, Argentina: Results from 100 years of research.

[118] Nimick, D.A., Moore, J.N., Dalby, C.E. & Savka, M.W. (1998). The fate of arsenic in the Madison and Missouri Rivers, Montana and Wyoming. *Water Resources Research*,

[119] NJDEP (2009). NJ Department of Environmental Protection Standards for Drinking Water. Ground Water, Soil, and Surface Water—Arsenic (Total). Available from

[120] Noguchi, K. & Nakagawa, R. (1969). Arsenic and arsenic-lead sulfides in sediments from Tamagawa hot springs, Akita Prefecture. *Proceedings of Japan Academy*, 45, 45-50.

[121] Nordstrom, D.K. (2002). Worldwide occurrences of arsenic in ground water. *Science,*

[122] Nriagu, J.O., Bhattacharya, P., Mukherjee, A.b., Bundschuh, J., Zevenhoven, R., & Loeppert, R.H. (2007). Chapter 1. Arsenic in soil and groundwater: an overview. 3-60. In *Trace Metals and other Contaminants in the Environment, Volume 9.* Ed. P. Bhattachar‐ ya, A.B.Mukherjee, J. Bundschuh, R. Zevenhoven & R.H.Loeppert 3-60. Elsevier BV

[124] Onishi, H & Sandell, E.B. (1955). Geochemistry of arsenic. *Geochimica et Cosmochimica*

[123] O'Day, P.A. (2006). Chemistry and mineralogy of arsenic. *Elements,* 2, 77-83.

tions on Bangladesh. *Nature Geoscience* 1-7. DOI:10.1038/NGEO685.

natural sources. *Chemosphere,* 52, 1353-1359.

*Science of the Total Environment*, 429, 36-56.

www.state.nj.us/dep/standards/pdf/7440-38-2.pdf.

2022-2028.

water guidelines.

34, 3051-3067.

*2*96, 2143-2145.

*Acta,* 7, 1-33.

*Geochemistry,* 15, 403-413.

*plied Geochemistry*, 20, 55-68.


[111] Neumann, R.B., Ashfaque, K.N., Badruzzaman, A.B.M, Ali, M.A., Shoemaker, J.K & Harvey, C.F. (2009). Anthropogenic influences on groundwater arsenic concentra‐ tions on Bangladesh. *Nature Geoscience* 1-7. DOI:10.1038/NGEO685.

[99] McLean, J.E., DuPont, R.R. & Sorensen, D.L. (2006). Iron and arsenic release from aquifer solids in response to biostimulation. *Journal of Environmental Quality*. 35,

[100] Méndez, M., & Armienta, M.A. (2003). Arsenic phase distribution in Zimapan mine

[101] Mladenov, N., Zheng, Y., Miller, M.P., Nemergut, D.R., Legg, T., Simone, B., Hage‐ man, C., Rahman, M.M., Ahmed, K.M. & McKnight, D.M. (2010). Dissolved organic matter sources and consequences for iron and arsenic mobilization in Bangladesh

[102] Moncur, M.C., Ptacek, C.J., Blowes, D.W. & Jambor, J.L. (2005). Release, transport and attenuation of metals from an old tailings impoundment. *Applied Geochemistry*,

[103] Morin, G. & Calas, G. (2006). Arsenic in soils, mine tailings, and former industrial

[104] Mosier, D.L., Beger, V.I. & Singer, D.A. (2009). Volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits of the world: database and grade and tonnage models. *U.S. Geological Survey Open-*

[105] Mueller, S., Verplanck, P. & Goldfarb, R. (2001). Ground-water studies in Fairbanks, Alaska—A better understanding of some of the United States' highest natural arsenic

[106] Mukherjee, A., Sengupta, M.K., Hossain, M.A., Ahamed, S., Das, B., Nayak, B., Lodh, D., Rahman, M.M. & Chakraborti, D. (2006). Arsenic contamination in groundwater: A global perspective with emphasis on the Asian scenario. *Journal of Health and Popu‐*

[107] Mumford, A.C., Barringer, J.L., Benzel, W.M., Reilly, P.A. & Young, L.Y. (2012). Mi‐ crobial transformations of arsenic: Mobilization from glauconitic sediments to water.

[108] Nakayama, S.M.M., Ikenaka, Y., Hamada, K., Muzandu, K., Choongo, K., Teraoka, H., Mizuno, N. & Ishizuka, M. (2011). Metal and metalloid contamination in roadside soils and wild rats around a Pb-Zn mine in Kabwe, Zambia. *Environmental Pollution*,

[109] National Research Council (1999). Arsenic in Drinking Water. Washington, D.C. Na‐

[110] Navarro, A., Font, X., Viladevall, M. (2011). Geochemistry and groundwater contami‐ nation in the La Selva geothermal system (Girona, Northeast Spain). *Geothermics,* 40,

*File Report 2009-1034.* Available from http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1034.

tailings, Mexico. *Geofisica Internacional*, 42, 131-140.

110 Current Perspectives in Contaminant Hydrology and Water Resources Sustainability

aquifers. *Environmental Science and Technology*, 44, 123-128.

concentrations*. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet FS-111-01*.

1193-1203.

20, 639-659.

sites. *Elements,* 2, 97-101.

*lation Nutrition*, 24, 142-163.

*Water Research*, 46, 2859-2868.

159, 175-181.

275-285.

tional Academy Press.


[125] Oremland R.,S., & Stolz, J.F. (2005). Arsenic, microbes, and contaminated aquifers. *Trends in Microbiology,* 13, 45-49.

[137] Ravenscroft, P., Brammer, H., & Richards, K. (2009) Arsenic Pollution: A Global Syn‐

Arsenic in Groundwater: A Summary of Sources and the Biogeochemical and Hydrogeologic Factors Affecting…

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55354

113

[138] Ravenscroft, P., McArthur, J.M. & Hoque, B.A. (2001). Geochemical and palaeohy‐ drological controls on pollution of groundwater by arsenic. 53-78. In. *Arsenic exposure and health effects IV*. Ed. W.R. Chappell, C.O. Abernathy & R. Calderon.. Oxford,

[139] Rhine, E.D., Onesios, K.M., Serfes, M.E., Reinfelder, J.R. & Young, L.Y. (2008). Arsen‐ ic transformation and mobilization from minerals by the arsenite oxidizing strain

[140] Rice, K.C., Conko, K.M. & Hornberger, G.M. (2002). Anthropogenic sources of arsen‐ ic and copper to sediments in a suburban lake, northern Virginia. *Environmental Sci‐*

[141] Robinson, B., Clothier, B., Bolan, N.S., Mahimairaja, S., Grevn, M., Moni, C., Marche‐ tti, M., van den Dijssel, C. & Milne, G. (2004). Arsenic in the New Zealand environ‐ ment. *SuperSoil 2004. 3rd Australian New Zealand Soils Conference,* 509, December 2004, University of Sydney, Australia. Available from www.regional.org.au/au/asssi.

[142] Rosas, I., Belmont, R., Armienta, A., Boaz, A. (1999). Arsenic concentrations in water, soil, milk, and forage in Comarca Lagunera, Mexico. *Water, Air, and Soil Pollution*,

[143] Rowland, H., Omoregie, E., Millot, R., Jimenez C., Mertens, J., Baciu, C., Hug, S.J. & Berg, M. (2011). Geochemistry and arsenic mobilization to groundwaters of the Pan‐

[144] Rowland, H.A.L., Pederick, R.L., Polya, D.A., Pancost, R.D., van Dongen, B.E., Gault, A.G., Vaugh, D.J., Bryant, C., Anderson, B., Lloyd, J.R. (2007). The control of organic matter on microbially mediated iron reduction and arsenic release in shallow alluvial

[145] Rowland, H.A.L., Polya, D.A,, Lloyd, J.R. & Pancost, R.D. (2006). Characterization of organic matter in a shallow, reducing, arsenic-rich aquifer, West Bengal. *Organic*

[146] Ryan, P.C., Kim, J., Wall, A.J., Moen, J.C., Corenthal, L.G., Chow, D.R., Sullivan, C.M., & Bright, K.S. (2011). Ultramafic-derived arsenic in a fractured rock aquifer.

[147] Saltikov, C.W., Cifuentes, A., Venkateswaran, K., & Newman, D.K. (2003). The *ars* detoxification system is advantageous but not required for As(V) respiration by the genetically tractable *Shewanella* strain ANA-3. *Applied and Environmental Microbiology*,

[148] Santini, J.M. and Ward, S.A. (eds.) (2012) Metabolism of Arsenite. CRC Press.

nonian Basin (Hungary and Romania). *Applied Geochemistry*, 26, 1-17.

WAO. *Environmental Science and Technology,* 42, 1423-1429.

thesis. Wiley-Blackwell, 588 pp.

*ence and Technology,* 36, 4962-4967.

aquifers, Cambodia. *Geobiology,* 5, 281-292.

*Chemistry*, 37, 1101-1114.

69, 2800-2809.

*Applied Geochemistry*, 26, 444-457.

Elsevier Science, Ltd.

112, 133-149.


[137] Ravenscroft, P., Brammer, H., & Richards, K. (2009) Arsenic Pollution: A Global Syn‐ thesis. Wiley-Blackwell, 588 pp.

[125] Oremland R.,S., & Stolz, J.F. (2005). Arsenic, microbes, and contaminated aquifers.

[126] Palumbo-Roe, B., Klinck, B. & Cave, M. (2007). Arsenic speciation and mobility in mine wastes from a copper-arsenic mine in Devon, UK: a SEM, XAS, sequential chemical extraction study, Chapter 17. 441-471. In *Trace Metals and other Contaminants in the Environment, Volume 9*. Ed. P. Bhattacharya, A.B.Mukherjee, J.Bundschuh,, R.

[127] Pearcy, C.A., Chevis, D.A., Haug, T.J., Jeffries, H.A., Yang, N., Tang, J., Grimm. D.A., & Johannesson, K.H. (2011). Evidence of microbially mediated mobilization from sediments of the Aquia aquifer, Maryland, USA. *Applied Geochemistry*, 26, 575-586.

[128] Peters, S.C. (2008). Arsenic in groundwaters in the Northern Appalachian Mountain belt: A review of patterns and processes. *Journal of Contaminant Hydrology*, 99, 8-21.

[129] Peters, S.C. & Burkert, L. (2007). The occurrence and geochemistry of arsenic in groundwaters of the Newark Basin of Pennsylvania. *Applied Geochemistry*, 23, 85-98.

[130] Peters, S.C. & Blum, J.D. (2003). The source and transport of arsenic in a bedrock

[131] Peters, S.C., Blum, J.D., Klaue, B. & Karagas, M.R. (1999). Arsenic occurrence in New Hampshire drinking water. *Environmental Science and Technology*, 33. 1328-1333. [132] Piqué, A., Grandia, F., & Canals, A. (2010). Processes releasing arsenic to groundwa‐ ter in the Caldes de Malavella geothermal area, NE Spain. *Water Research,* 44,

[133] Planer-Friedrich, B., London, J., McCleskey, R.B., Nordstrom, D.K., & Wallschläger. (2007). Thioarsenates in geothermal waters of Yellowstone National Park: Determina‐ tion, preservation, and geochemical importance. *Environmental Science and Technolo‐*

[134] Price, R.E. & Pichler, T. (2006). Abundance and mineralogical association of arsenic in the Suwannee Limestone (Florida): Implications for arsenic release during water-

[135] Quicksall, A.N., Bostick, B.C. & Sampson, M.L. (2008). Linking organic matter depo‐ sition and iron mineral transformations to groundwater arsenic levels in the Mekong

[136] Rahman, M.M., Sengupta, M.K., Ahamed, S., Lodh, D., Das, B., Hossain, M.A., Nayak, B., Mukherjee, A., Mukherjee, S.C., Pati, S., Saha, K.C., Palit, S.K., Kaies, I., Barua, K., Asad, K.A. (2005). Murshidabad—One of the nine groundwater arsenic-af‐ fected districts of West Bengal, India, Part I: Magnitude of contamination and popu‐

aquifer, New Hampshire, USA. *Applied Geochemistry*, 18, 1773-1787.

*Trends in Microbiology,* 13, 45-49.

5618-5630.

*gy*, 41, 5245-5251.

rock interaction. *Chemical Geology*, 228, 44-56.

lation at risk. *Clinical Toxicology,* 43, 823-834.

delta, Cambodia. *Applied Geochemistry*, 23, 3088-3098.

Zevenhoven & R.H. Loeppert. Elsevier BV.

112 Current Perspectives in Contaminant Hydrology and Water Resources Sustainability


[149] Scanlon, B.R., Nicot, J.P., Reedy, R.C., Kurtzman, D., Mukherjee, A., & Nordstrom, D.K. (2009). Elevated naturally occurring arsenic in a semiarid oxidizing system, Southern High Plains aquifer, Texas, USA. *Applied Geochemistry*, 24, 2061-2071.

[161] Stauffer, R.E. & Thompson, J.M. (1984). Arsenic and antimony in geothermal waters of Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA. *Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta*, 48,

Arsenic in Groundwater: A Summary of Sources and the Biogeochemical and Hydrogeologic Factors Affecting…

[162] Sthiannopkao, S., Kim, K.W., Sotham, S. & Choup, S. (2008). Arsenic and manganese in tube well waters of Prey Veng and Kandal Provinces, Cambodia. *Applied Geochem‐*

[163] Stollenwerk, K.G., Breit, G.N., Welch, A.H., Yount, J.C., Whitney, J.W., Foster, A.L., Uddin, M.N., Majumder, R.K. & Ahmed, N. (2007). Arsenic attenuation by oxidized

aquifer sediments in Bangladesh. *Science of the Total Environment*, 379, 133-150. [164] Tanner, C.C. & Clayton, J.S. (1990). Persistence of arsenic 24 years after sodium ar‐ senite herbicide application to Lake Rotoroa, Hamilton, New Zealand. New Zealand

[165] Thornburg, K. & Sahai, N. (2004). Arsenic occurrence, mobilization, and retardation in sandstone and dolomite formations of the Fox River Valley in Eastern Wisconsin.

[166] Tun, T.N. (2003). Arsenic contamination of water sources in rural Myanmar. Proceed‐

[167] Ujevic, M., Duic, Z, Casiot, C., Sipos, L., Santo, V., Dadic, Z. & Halamic, J. (2010). Oc‐ currence and geochemistry of arsenic in the groundwater of eastern Croatia. *Applied*

[168] Ure, A. & Berrow, M., (1982). Chapter 3. The elemental constituents of soils. In *Envi‐ ronmental Chemistry* Ed. H.J.M Bowen. 94-203. London, Royal Society of Chemistry.

[169] USEPA (2001). Drinking Water Standard for Arsenic, USEPA Fact Sheet 815-F-00-105. [170] USEPA (2011). Five-Year Review Report, Vineland Chemical Company Superfund Site, Vineland Township, Cumberland County, New Jersey. U.S. Environmental Pro‐

[171] van Geen, A., Zheng, Y., Versteeg, R., Stute, M., Horneman, A., Dhar, R., Steckler, M., Gelman, A., Small, C., Ahsan, H., Graziano, J.H., Hussain, I. & Ahmed, K.M. (2003).

[173] Varsányi, I. & Kovács, L.Ó. (2006). Arsenic, iron, and organic matter in sediments and groundwater in the Pannonian Basin, Hungary. *Applied Geochemistry*, 21,

[174] Walsh, L.M., & Keeney, D.R. (1975). Behavior and phytotoxicity of inorganic arseni‐ cals in soils. Chapter 3, In *Arsenical Pesticides,* Ed. E.A. Woolson. 35-52. Washington,

[172] van Siclen, A.P. & Gerry, C.N. (1936). Arsenic. *U.S. Minerals Yearbook*. 495-500.

area of Bangladesh. *Water*

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55354

115

Spatial variability of arsenic in 6000 tube wells in a 25 km2

D.C., ACS Symposium series 7, American Chemical Society.

ings, 29th WEDC International Conference, Abuja Nigeria, 219-221.

Journal of Marine & Freshwater Research, 24, 173-179.

*Environmental Science and Technology*, 38, 5087-5094.

2547-2561.

*istry*, 23, 1086-1093.

*Geochemistry*, 25, 1917-1029.

tection Agency, Region 2, New York.

*Resources Research*, 39, (HWC 3) 1-16.

949-963.


[161] Stauffer, R.E. & Thompson, J.M. (1984). Arsenic and antimony in geothermal waters of Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA. *Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta*, 48, 2547-2561.

[149] Scanlon, B.R., Nicot, J.P., Reedy, R.C., Kurtzman, D., Mukherjee, A., & Nordstrom, D.K. (2009). Elevated naturally occurring arsenic in a semiarid oxidizing system,

114 Current Perspectives in Contaminant Hydrology and Water Resources Sustainability

Southern High Plains aquifer, Texas, USA. *Applied Geochemistry*, 24, 2061-2071. [150] Seddique, A.A., Masuda, H., Miamura, M., Shinoda, K., Yamanaka, T., Itai, T., Mar‐ uoka, T., Uesugi, K., Ahmed, K.M. & Biswas, D.K. (2008). Arsenic release from biotite into a Holocene groundwater aquifer in Bangladesh. *Applied Geochemistry*, 23, 85-98.

[151] Sengupta, S., McArthur, J.M., Sarkar, A., Leng, M.j., Ravenscroft, P., Howarth, R.J., & Banerjee, D.M. (2008). Do ponds cause arsenic pollution of groundwater in the Ben‐ gal Basin? An answer from West Bengal. *Environmental Science and Technology,* 42,

[152] Senior, L.A. & Sloto, R.A. (2006). Arsenic, boron, and fluoride concentrations in ground water in and near diabase intrusions, Newark Basin, Southeastern Pennsyl‐

[153] Serfes, M. (2005). Arsenic occurrence, sources, mobilization, transport and prediction in the major bedrock aquifers of the Newark Basin, Ph.D. Dissertation, Rutgers Uni‐

[154] Sharif, M.U., Davis, R.K., Steele, K.F., Kim, B., Hays, P.D., Kresse, T.M. & Fazio, J.A. (2008). Distribution and variability of redox zones controlling spatial variability of ar‐ senic in the Mississippi River Valley alluvial aquifer, southeastern Arkansas. *Journal*

[155] Smedley, P.L. (2008). Sources and distribution of arsenic in groundwater and aqui‐ fers. Chapter 4, In *Arsenic in Groundwater: a World Problem*, Ed. C.A.J. Appelo. *Proceed‐ ings of the IAH Seminar,* Utrecht, Netherlands, Nov. 2006. NERC Open Research

[156] Smedley P.L., & Kinniburgh, D.G. (2002). A review of the source, behavior and distri‐

[157] Smedley, P.L., Knudsen, J. & Maiga, D.(2007). Arsenic in groundwater from mineral‐ ized Proterozoic basement rocks of Burkina Faso. *Applied Geochemistry*, 22, 1074-1092.

[158] Smedley, P.L., Zhang, M-Y, Zhangm G-Y & Luo, Z-D. (2003). Mobilization of arsenic and other trace elements in fluviolacustrine aquifers of the Huhhot Basin, Inner Mon‐

[159] Smith, A.H., Lingas, E.O., & Rahman, M. (2000). Contamination of drinking-water by arsenic in Bangladesh: a public health emergency. *Bulletin of the World Health Organi‐*

[160] Smith, A.H., Lopipero, P.A., Bates, M.N., & Steinmaus, C.M. (2002). Arsenic epidemi‐

ology and drinking water standards. *Science*, 296, 2145-2146.

Archive. Available from http://nova.nerc.ac.uk, accessed 7/6/12.

bution of arsenic in natural waters. *Applied Geochemistry,* 17, 517-568.

vania. *U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5261.*

5156-5164.

versity, 122 p.

*of Contaminant Hydrology,* 99, 49-67.

golia. *Applied Geochemistry*, 18, 1453-1477.

*zation*, 78, 1093-1103.


[175] Wang, S., & Mulligan, C.N. (2006a). Occurrence of arsenic contamination in Canada: Sources, behavior and distribution. *Science of the Total Environment*, 366, 701-721.

**Chapter 5**

; MeHg), is

**Occurrence and Mobility**

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55487

**1.1. Forms, toxicity, and health effects**

**1. Introduction**

range1

per-liter level are rare.

kilograms and (or) milligrams per kilogram.

**of Mercury in Groundwater**

Julia L. Barringer, Zoltan Szabo and Pamela A. Reilly

Mercury (Hg) has long been identified as an element that is injurious, even lethal, to living organisms. Exposure to its inorganic form, mainly from elemental Hg (Hg(0)) vapor (Fitzger‐ ald & Lamborg, 2007) can cause damage to respiratory, neural, and renal systems (Hutton,

substantially more toxic than the inorganic form (Fitzgerald & Lamborg, 2007). Methylmercury attacks the nervous system and exposure can prove lethal, as demonstrated by well-known incidents such as those in 1956 in Minimata, Japan (Harada, 1995), and 1971 in rural Iraq (Bakir et al., 1973), where, in the former, industrial release of MeHg into coastal waters severely tainted the fish caught and eaten by the local population, and in the latter, grain seed treated with an organic mercurial fungicide was not planted, but eaten in bread instead. Resultant deaths are not known with certainty but have been estimated at about 100 and 500, respectively (Hutton, 1987). Absent such lethal accidents, human exposure to MeHg comes mainly from ingestion of piscivorous fish in which MeHg has accumulated, with potential fetal damage ascribed to high fish diets during their mothers' pregnancies (USEPA, 2001). Lesser human exposure occurs through ingestion of drinking water (USEPA, 2001), where concentrations of total Hg (THg; inorganic plus organic forms) typically are in the low nanograms-per-liter

, particularly from many groundwater sources, and concentrations at the microgram-

© 2013 Barringer et al.; licensee InTech. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

© 2013 Barringer et al.; licensee InTech. This is a paper distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1 Because many studies report Hg concentrations in units of nanograms per liter, results reported for aqueous samples in other units herein will be converted to nanograms per liter. Contents of solid materials will be reported in megagrams,

1987; USEPA, 2012; WHO, 2012). The organic form, methylmercury (CH3Hg+

Additional information is available at the end of the chapter


## **Chapter 5**
