**Iron Overload and Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation**

Zeynep Arzu Yegin, Gülsan Türköz Sucak and Taner Demirer

Additional information is available at the end of the chapter

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/53819

## **1. Introduction**

lapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant (2009). ,

[43] Peggs, K. S, Hunter, A, Chopra, R, Parker, A, Mahendra, P, Milligan, D, et al. Clinical evidence of a graft-versus-Hodgkin's-lymphoma effect after reduced intensity alloge‐

[44] Alvarez, I, Sureda, A, Caballero, M. D, Urbano-ispizua, A, Ribera, J. M, et al. Non‐ myeloablative stem cell transplantation is an effective therapy for refractory or re‐ lapsed Hodgkin lymphoma: results of a Spanish prospective cooperative protocol.

[45] Anderlini, P, Saliba, R, Acholonu, S, Okoroji, G. J, Donato, M, et al. Reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation in relapsed and refractory Hodgkin's disease: low transplant-related mortality and impact of intensity of conditioning regimen.

[46] Anderlini, P, Saliba, R, Acholonu, S, Giralt, S. A, Andersson, B, et al. Fludarabinemelphalan as a preparative regimen for reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation in relapsed and refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma: the updat‐ ed M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Haematologica (2008). , 93, 257-264. [47] Sarina, B, Castagna, L, Farina, L, Patriarca, F, Benedetti, F, Carella, A. M, et al. Allo‐ geneic transplantation improves the overall and progression-free survival of Hodg‐ kin lymphoma patients relapsing after autologous transplantation: a retrospective study based on the time of HLAtyping and donor availability. Blood. (2010). ,

[48] Robinson, S. P, Sureda, A, Canals, C, Russell, N, Caballero, D, Bacigalupo, A, et al. Reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation for Hodgkin's lymphoma: identification of prognostic factors predicting outcome. Haematologica

[49] Dodero, A, Crocchiolo, R, Patriarca, F, Miceli, R, Castagna, L, Ciceri, F, et al. Pre‐ transplantation [18 F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Scan Pre‐ dicts Outcome in Patients With Recurrent Hodgkin Lymphoma or Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Undergoing Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Followed by

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation. Cancer (2010). , 116, 5001-5011.

neic transplantation. Lancet (2005). , 365, 1934-1941.

Biol Blood Marrow Transplant (2006). , 12, 172-183.

Bone Marrow Transplant (2005). , 35, 943-951.

15, 109-117.

304 Innovations in Stem Cell Transplantation

115(18), 3671-3677.

(2009). , 94, 230-238.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an established treatment modality with a curative potential in a variety of hematological disorders. Although remarkable advances in transplant immunology and supportive care allowed widespread use of HSCT, transplant related morbidity and mortality remain as a problem [1-7]. Early complications including si‐ nusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), hemorrhagic cystitis, engraftment syndrome, idio‐ pathic pneumonia syndrome (IPS), infections and graft versus host disease (GVHD) are the major causes of morbidity and non relapse mortality (NRM). High doses of radiotherapy and chemotherapy of the conditioning regimen have adverse effects on all organs and tis‐ sues of the recipient, which also triggers several early and late effects of variable intensity [1, 3, 5-8]. Iron overload (IO) is a relatively common condition in patients with hematological malignacies and HSCT recipients. Free iron which accompanies IO might contribute to the already existing prooxidant state in HSCT recipients by inducing the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Tissue peroxidation and organ damage, as a consequence, contribute to the development of some early transplant complications [2, 4, 5, 9]. Increasing number of transplants performed each year and improved transplant techniques result in a rise in the number of long term survivors. The primary goal of HSCT is to cure the primary disease. However long term transplant related morbidity might be very challenging and might sig‐ nificantly impair the quality of life. Late effects might be the consequence of the direct toxici‐ ty of chemoradiotherapy and/or the immunologic complications mainly consisting of GVHD. Besides the secondary late effects including osteoporosis and dental caries, very late effects, namely cardiovascular toxicity considered as tertiary late effect may also occur. Among this wide spectrum of complications, IO has a substantial role as a contributor to liv‐

© 2013 Yegin et al.; licensee InTech. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. © 2013 The Author(s). Licensee InTech. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

er toxicity, infections and SOS and as a predictor of transplant outcome. Hematopoietic SCT recipients have been demonstrated to have a high degree of liver iron content (LIC) almost in the range of hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) and IO was shown to cause liver fibrosis, heart failure, hypogonadism, diabetes and endocrinopathy in HSCT recipients in the long run [4, 6, 7, 10].

There are no physiological mechanisms in humans to excrete excess iron and iron homeosta‐ sis is primarily regulated at the level of absorbtion [4, 9, 11, 14-16]. The majority of iron ab‐ sorbtion occurs via enterocytes in the proximal small intestine. The conversion of dietary inorganic non–heme iron to Fe+2 is facilitated by the brush border ferri reductases. Iron is transported across the cellular membrane by the divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1) which transfers Fe+2 across the apical membrane and into the cell through a proton coupled process [9, 15, 16]. Ferroportin is an iron efflux pump that mediates the export of Fe+3 from the enter‐ ocyte. Prior to transport, Fe+2 is converted to Fe+3 by either hephaestin or ceruloplasmin both of which have ferroxidase activity. Subsequently, iron is uploaded to transferrin which is the primary iron transporter in the circulation. Ferric iron bound to transferrin is soluble and non reactive. The majority of iron (60–70%) is incorporated into hemoglobin while the rest is stored in hepatocytes, myoglobin and reticuloendothelial macrophages [9]. Hepcidin, the main regulator of iron absorbtion, inhibits intestinal absorbtion and release of storage iron in iron-overloaded states, whereas its expression is markedly decreased in iron deficiency states. Hepcidin interacts directly with ferroportin, causing its internalization, degradation and blocking iron release from cells to plasma. Hepcidin acts as an acute phase reactant which is responsible for the anemia of inflammation. Its production is upregulated by body iron excess and inflammation whereas downregulated by anemia and hypoxia [9, 14, 16].

Iron Overload and Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/53819

307

Cell survival depends on the balance between the destructive and beneficial effects of iron [9, 12]. Natural iron homeostasis comprises regulation mechanisms to control iron excess. The primary protective pathway is the sequestration of iron in ferritin or transferrin. Ferritin is the chief storage molecule while transferrin is functionary for the transport of iron. Ferri‐ tin captures and buffers the intracellular iron pool, thus it makes iron available for critical cellular processes while protecting lipids, DNA and proteins from potentially toxic effects of iron. Iron stored in ferritin is not capable of catalyzing radical reactions and is considered as safe. It is well known that serum ferritin concentration closely parallels body iron reserves. However, as free iron is the main form of iron which can precipitate in oxidative stress, any measure of unbound iron will result in deleterious effects. The balance of free iron to bound iron changes and free iron becomes available to catalyze free radical reactions in iron over‐ loaded states [5, 9]. Large amounts of excess iron in the circulation are likely to exceed the serum iron binding capacity (SIBC) and non transferrin bound iron (NTBI) will emerge eventually. Non transferrin bound iron bypasses the normal regulatory mechanism of recep‐ tor mediated iron uptake and is able to stimulate the peroxidation of membrane lipids and the formation of ROS. The intracellular counterpart of NTBI is considered as labile iron pool (LIP) which is bound mainly to low molecular weight compounds. Labile iron pool is cata‐ lytically active and capable of initiating free radical reactions. The expansion of the LIP and simultaneously increased NTBI may trigger cell toxicity. Generation of LIP leads to unregu‐ lated iron uptake and subsequent intracellular storage either within ferritin molecules or as hemosiderin. The adverse effects of IO can arise from the elevation of NTBI and LIP in plas‐ ma and might as well cause organ damage mediated by the accumulation of tissue iron in target organs. The equilibrium between the LIP and iron locked in the ferritin shell is critical to maintain the normal function of cellular iron enzymes. Imbalance in this equilibrium re‐ sults in the uncontrolled loading of organs, such as the liver, heart and endocrine glands,

Iron is an essential element which plays a key role in several biochemical reactions including oxygen transport and electron transfer. It mediates the conversion of hydrogen peroxyde (H2O2) to highly toxic free radicals leading to tissue damage by oxidation of proteins, per‐ oxidation of membrane lipids and modification of nucleic acids [4]. Under normal circum‐ stances, an appreciable concentration of free iron does not exist outside physiological sinks. Any released ferrous iron (Fe+2) is immediately chelated in cells by compounds such as cit‐ rate or adenosine diphosphate. Thus, labile iron could not participate in the Haber–Weiss reaction, which catalyses the formation of ROS. Free iron may directly initiate lipid peroxi‐ dation which destroys membrane structure resulting in increased oxidative stress and cellu‐ lar damage. Excess iron accumulation causes chronic free radical induced tissue damage in multiple organs and leads to progressive organ dysfunction, which results in significant morbidity and mortality. In this respect, IO should be prevented in order to preclude the ad‐ verse impact of free iron on natural homeostasis [9, 11].

This chapter will focus on iron balance and the course of excess iron in HSCT recipients. The ad‐ verse impact of IO on transplant outcome and the preventive strategies will also be discussed.

## **2. Body**

#### **2.1. Iron homeostasis**

Iron is vital for all living organisms and takes part in several metabolic processes, including DNA synthesis, oxygen and electron transport. Although iron is a critical element in cell growth and multiplication, it is potentially toxic in excess amounts by generating ROS [5, 11-13]. Reactive oxygen species have a potential to damage DNA and proteins by lipid per‐ oxidation. Labile iron participates in free radical formation via Fenton reaction which was first recognized in 1894. Namely, trace amounts of iron as Fe+2 could catalyze the oxidation of tartrate by H2O2. Consequently, superoxide anion (O2 - ) or H2O2 is converted to toxic free radicals such as hydroxyl radical (OH- ). This process is mediated by the Fenton reaction cat‐ alyzed by iron, where O2 reduces ferric iron (Fe+3) to produce oxygen and Fe+2. This reduced iron becomes reoxidized by H2O2 to produce OH- [5, 11].

There are no physiological mechanisms in humans to excrete excess iron and iron homeosta‐ sis is primarily regulated at the level of absorbtion [4, 9, 11, 14-16]. The majority of iron ab‐ sorbtion occurs via enterocytes in the proximal small intestine. The conversion of dietary inorganic non–heme iron to Fe+2 is facilitated by the brush border ferri reductases. Iron is transported across the cellular membrane by the divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1) which transfers Fe+2 across the apical membrane and into the cell through a proton coupled process [9, 15, 16]. Ferroportin is an iron efflux pump that mediates the export of Fe+3 from the enter‐ ocyte. Prior to transport, Fe+2 is converted to Fe+3 by either hephaestin or ceruloplasmin both of which have ferroxidase activity. Subsequently, iron is uploaded to transferrin which is the primary iron transporter in the circulation. Ferric iron bound to transferrin is soluble and non reactive. The majority of iron (60–70%) is incorporated into hemoglobin while the rest is stored in hepatocytes, myoglobin and reticuloendothelial macrophages [9]. Hepcidin, the main regulator of iron absorbtion, inhibits intestinal absorbtion and release of storage iron in iron-overloaded states, whereas its expression is markedly decreased in iron deficiency states. Hepcidin interacts directly with ferroportin, causing its internalization, degradation and blocking iron release from cells to plasma. Hepcidin acts as an acute phase reactant which is responsible for the anemia of inflammation. Its production is upregulated by body iron excess and inflammation whereas downregulated by anemia and hypoxia [9, 14, 16].

er toxicity, infections and SOS and as a predictor of transplant outcome. Hematopoietic SCT recipients have been demonstrated to have a high degree of liver iron content (LIC) almost in the range of hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) and IO was shown to cause liver fibrosis, heart failure, hypogonadism, diabetes and endocrinopathy in HSCT recipients in the long

Iron is an essential element which plays a key role in several biochemical reactions including oxygen transport and electron transfer. It mediates the conversion of hydrogen peroxyde (H2O2) to highly toxic free radicals leading to tissue damage by oxidation of proteins, per‐ oxidation of membrane lipids and modification of nucleic acids [4]. Under normal circum‐ stances, an appreciable concentration of free iron does not exist outside physiological sinks. Any released ferrous iron (Fe+2) is immediately chelated in cells by compounds such as cit‐ rate or adenosine diphosphate. Thus, labile iron could not participate in the Haber–Weiss reaction, which catalyses the formation of ROS. Free iron may directly initiate lipid peroxi‐ dation which destroys membrane structure resulting in increased oxidative stress and cellu‐ lar damage. Excess iron accumulation causes chronic free radical induced tissue damage in multiple organs and leads to progressive organ dysfunction, which results in significant morbidity and mortality. In this respect, IO should be prevented in order to preclude the ad‐

This chapter will focus on iron balance and the course of excess iron in HSCT recipients. The ad‐ verse impact of IO on transplant outcome and the preventive strategies will also be discussed.

Iron is vital for all living organisms and takes part in several metabolic processes, including DNA synthesis, oxygen and electron transport. Although iron is a critical element in cell growth and multiplication, it is potentially toxic in excess amounts by generating ROS [5, 11-13]. Reactive oxygen species have a potential to damage DNA and proteins by lipid per‐ oxidation. Labile iron participates in free radical formation via Fenton reaction which was first recognized in 1894. Namely, trace amounts of iron as Fe+2 could catalyze the oxidation

**Figure 1.** a. Fenton reaction; b. Iron catalyzed Haber–Weiss reaction or the superoxide driven Fenton reaction [5].


[5, 11].

reduces ferric iron (Fe+3) to produce oxygen and Fe+2. This reduced

). This process is mediated by the Fenton reaction cat‐

) or H2O2 is converted to toxic free

verse impact of free iron on natural homeostasis [9, 11].

of tartrate by H2O2. Consequently, superoxide anion (O2


iron becomes reoxidized by H2O2 to produce OH-

radicals such as hydroxyl radical (OH-

alyzed by iron, where O2

run [4, 6, 7, 10].

306 Innovations in Stem Cell Transplantation

**2. Body**

**2.1. Iron homeostasis**

Cell survival depends on the balance between the destructive and beneficial effects of iron [9, 12]. Natural iron homeostasis comprises regulation mechanisms to control iron excess. The primary protective pathway is the sequestration of iron in ferritin or transferrin. Ferritin is the chief storage molecule while transferrin is functionary for the transport of iron. Ferri‐ tin captures and buffers the intracellular iron pool, thus it makes iron available for critical cellular processes while protecting lipids, DNA and proteins from potentially toxic effects of iron. Iron stored in ferritin is not capable of catalyzing radical reactions and is considered as safe. It is well known that serum ferritin concentration closely parallels body iron reserves. However, as free iron is the main form of iron which can precipitate in oxidative stress, any measure of unbound iron will result in deleterious effects. The balance of free iron to bound iron changes and free iron becomes available to catalyze free radical reactions in iron over‐ loaded states [5, 9]. Large amounts of excess iron in the circulation are likely to exceed the serum iron binding capacity (SIBC) and non transferrin bound iron (NTBI) will emerge eventually. Non transferrin bound iron bypasses the normal regulatory mechanism of recep‐ tor mediated iron uptake and is able to stimulate the peroxidation of membrane lipids and the formation of ROS. The intracellular counterpart of NTBI is considered as labile iron pool (LIP) which is bound mainly to low molecular weight compounds. Labile iron pool is cata‐ lytically active and capable of initiating free radical reactions. The expansion of the LIP and simultaneously increased NTBI may trigger cell toxicity. Generation of LIP leads to unregu‐ lated iron uptake and subsequent intracellular storage either within ferritin molecules or as hemosiderin. The adverse effects of IO can arise from the elevation of NTBI and LIP in plas‐ ma and might as well cause organ damage mediated by the accumulation of tissue iron in target organs. The equilibrium between the LIP and iron locked in the ferritin shell is critical to maintain the normal function of cellular iron enzymes. Imbalance in this equilibrium re‐ sults in the uncontrolled loading of organs, such as the liver, heart and endocrine glands, with free iron which generates free radicals and causes cell damage [12, 17]. Eventually, NTBI and LIP may be more relevant iron markers than serum ferritin and transferrin as a predictor of IO induced tissue damage. Alterations in ferritin levels are seen commonly in clinical practice often reflecting perturbations in iron homeostasis or metabolism. Serum fer‐ ritin differs markedly from tissue ferritin in molecular weight, iron and carbonhydrate con‐ tent, subunit size and amino acid sequence. The extracellular form of ferritin, termed as serum ferritin, is used as a clinical marker of iron status. Tissue ferritin is the more efficient storage form of iron than is serum ferritin and the function of serum ferritin has to be clari‐ fied in these circumstances [9, 12]. Serum ferritin is usually correlated with NTBI, whereas inflammation, acute and chronic liver diseases and malignancies may also cause elevated se‐ rum ferritin levels regardless of the iron stores [12].

inhibition of erythropoiesis as a result of cytotoxic therapy are important factors in the etiol‐ ogy of IO. Erythropoiesis, which is the main route of iron utilization, is temporarily halted by the conditioning regimen [8, 22, 23, 26]. Conditioning treatment with chemo/radiothera‐ py during HSCT causes toxicity and immunosuppression leading to organ damage and in‐ fectious complications mainly in the first 3 months of the procedure [27]. Free iron, which acts as a free radical catalyser, might increase the toxicity of the conditioning regimen dur‐ ing HSCT. Serum iron parameters were demonstrated to be elevated 2–3 days during condi‐ tioning chemotherapy prior to stem cell infusion in a report by Gordon et al [13]. Non transferrin bound iron appears shortly after conditioning regimen and remains detectable in most patients throughout the peri–transplant period. Transferrin saturation (TS) increases during the conditioning regimen, often reaching to levels above 80% with the consequent emergence of NTBI [28]. The ability of ferritin to sequestrate iron and binding of iron to transferrin is exhausted in HSCT recipients receiving conditioning regimen, thus leading to excess NTBI formation. The extent of BM suppression caused by the conditioning regimen is correlated with the elevation of NTBI [27]. A substantial decrease in plasma anti-oxidant de‐ fense has also been demonstrated in HSCT recipients, and NTBI levels were found to be in‐ versely correlated with plasma antioxidant capacity in a report by Yegin et al [29]. A derangementof the prooxidative/antioxidative balance was demonstrated as antioxidants

Iron Overload and Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/53819

309

only partially recover to baseline values until day 14 after HSCT [30, 31].

tions in the early post–transplant period [29].

**Table 1.** Complications of IO in patients undergoing HSCT [24]

**Complication Incidence Mechanism of Injury**

Chronic liver disease Common Multifactorial, including IO

Hepatic toxicity due to chemotherapy and radiation might lead to hepatocellular damage with subsequent further release of hepatic iron stores. Liver damage may also disturb trans‐ ferrin synthesis [28, 30]. A decrease in transferrin due to hepatic toxicity, stored iron leaking from injured liver to blood and a suppression of erythropoietic activity during treatment may causes elevated TS levels. Thus, increasing TS succeeds and contributes to the appear‐ ance of potentially toxic NTBI in the circulation. Iron in its NTBI form is a potent catalyst in Fenton's reaction which produces ROS capable of causing cellular damage through various mechanisms. Tissue damage such as mucositis and liver injury is common after HSCT and may be partly mediated by NTBI during cytotoxic chemoradiotherapy [28, 29, 32]. It is indi‐ cated that increased NTBI levels may contribute to organ toxicity and infectious complica‐

Infection Variable Immune dysregulation, mediated in part by IO, iron-rich

SOS Common (up to 54%) Conditioning regimen, prior irradiation, possibly IO

IPS Uncommon (2-8%) Pro-inflammatory events and increased ROS (mediated by IO)

microbial environment

#### **2.2. Iron overload and stem cell transplantation**

Iron overload is a significant problem in autologous (auto) and allogeneic (allo) HSCT recip‐ ients and may adversely affect transplant outcome [4, 18]. The diagnosis of IO has been re‐ ported in up to 88% of long term survivors of HSCT on the basis of serum ferritin levels [19]. Iron overloaded state may last for a long time after transplantation. In a cross sectional study by Majhail et al, in which LIC on MRI was used for diagnosis, the prevalence of IO was reported to be 32% in allo-HSCT recipients who had survived 1 year or more following HSCT [20]. In another study by the same group, serum ferritin levels were found to be above 1000 ng/ml in 34% of allo-HSCT and 13% of auto-HSCT recipients. Thus, IO may be less prevalent among recipients of auto-HSCT compared to allo-HSCT as expected [21].

The main causes of IO in HSCT are prolonged dyserythropoiesis, increased intestinal iron absorbtion due to anemia and chemotherapy associated mucositis which leads to increased iron absorbtion, transfusion burden and release of iron from injured tissues [8, 22].

Iron overload is particularly common in HSCT recipients with hemoglobinopathies and hematological malignancies which require frequent transfusions and is associated with inef‐ fective erythropoesis such as acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Trans‐ fusion load is considered to be the principal cause of IO in this group, as each unit of packed red blood cells (PRBC) contains approximately 200–250 mg iron. Since there is no physiolog‐ ical mechanism for excreting excess iron, iron accumulation is inevitable after 10–20 transfu‐ sions [22-24]. Ineffective erythropoiesis might be a contributing factor leading to excessive iron absorbtion particularly in MDS and thalassemia which is mediated by erythroid regula‐ tors of iron metabolism which suppress hepcidin and result in increased iron absorbtion. Elevated growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF–15) levels are considered to be the initiating event in this context. Ineffective erythropoiesis either as a feature of the underlying disease or a consequence of intensive treatment leads to inhibition of hepcidin possibly due to over‐ expression of GDF–15 and thus increases iron absorbtion and toxicity. Hematopoietic SCT recipients are at risk of IO due to prior transfusion load, increased iron absorbtion related to elevated GDF–15 levels and peri–tansplant transfusions [22, 24, 25].

Bone marrow (BM) and tumor cell destruction which occurs as a consequence of high dose therapy and release of iron from damaged cells as well as underutilization of iron due to the inhibition of erythropoiesis as a result of cytotoxic therapy are important factors in the etiol‐ ogy of IO. Erythropoiesis, which is the main route of iron utilization, is temporarily halted by the conditioning regimen [8, 22, 23, 26]. Conditioning treatment with chemo/radiothera‐ py during HSCT causes toxicity and immunosuppression leading to organ damage and in‐ fectious complications mainly in the first 3 months of the procedure [27]. Free iron, which acts as a free radical catalyser, might increase the toxicity of the conditioning regimen dur‐ ing HSCT. Serum iron parameters were demonstrated to be elevated 2–3 days during condi‐ tioning chemotherapy prior to stem cell infusion in a report by Gordon et al [13]. Non transferrin bound iron appears shortly after conditioning regimen and remains detectable in most patients throughout the peri–transplant period. Transferrin saturation (TS) increases during the conditioning regimen, often reaching to levels above 80% with the consequent emergence of NTBI [28]. The ability of ferritin to sequestrate iron and binding of iron to transferrin is exhausted in HSCT recipients receiving conditioning regimen, thus leading to excess NTBI formation. The extent of BM suppression caused by the conditioning regimen is correlated with the elevation of NTBI [27]. A substantial decrease in plasma anti-oxidant de‐ fense has also been demonstrated in HSCT recipients, and NTBI levels were found to be in‐ versely correlated with plasma antioxidant capacity in a report by Yegin et al [29]. A derangementof the prooxidative/antioxidative balance was demonstrated as antioxidants only partially recover to baseline values until day 14 after HSCT [30, 31].

Hepatic toxicity due to chemotherapy and radiation might lead to hepatocellular damage with subsequent further release of hepatic iron stores. Liver damage may also disturb trans‐ ferrin synthesis [28, 30]. A decrease in transferrin due to hepatic toxicity, stored iron leaking from injured liver to blood and a suppression of erythropoietic activity during treatment may causes elevated TS levels. Thus, increasing TS succeeds and contributes to the appear‐ ance of potentially toxic NTBI in the circulation. Iron in its NTBI form is a potent catalyst in Fenton's reaction which produces ROS capable of causing cellular damage through various mechanisms. Tissue damage such as mucositis and liver injury is common after HSCT and may be partly mediated by NTBI during cytotoxic chemoradiotherapy [28, 29, 32]. It is indi‐ cated that increased NTBI levels may contribute to organ toxicity and infectious complica‐ tions in the early post–transplant period [29].


**Table 1.** Complications of IO in patients undergoing HSCT [24]

with free iron which generates free radicals and causes cell damage [12, 17]. Eventually, NTBI and LIP may be more relevant iron markers than serum ferritin and transferrin as a predictor of IO induced tissue damage. Alterations in ferritin levels are seen commonly in clinical practice often reflecting perturbations in iron homeostasis or metabolism. Serum fer‐ ritin differs markedly from tissue ferritin in molecular weight, iron and carbonhydrate con‐ tent, subunit size and amino acid sequence. The extracellular form of ferritin, termed as serum ferritin, is used as a clinical marker of iron status. Tissue ferritin is the more efficient storage form of iron than is serum ferritin and the function of serum ferritin has to be clari‐ fied in these circumstances [9, 12]. Serum ferritin is usually correlated with NTBI, whereas inflammation, acute and chronic liver diseases and malignancies may also cause elevated se‐

Iron overload is a significant problem in autologous (auto) and allogeneic (allo) HSCT recip‐ ients and may adversely affect transplant outcome [4, 18]. The diagnosis of IO has been re‐ ported in up to 88% of long term survivors of HSCT on the basis of serum ferritin levels [19]. Iron overloaded state may last for a long time after transplantation. In a cross sectional study by Majhail et al, in which LIC on MRI was used for diagnosis, the prevalence of IO was reported to be 32% in allo-HSCT recipients who had survived 1 year or more following HSCT [20]. In another study by the same group, serum ferritin levels were found to be above 1000 ng/ml in 34% of allo-HSCT and 13% of auto-HSCT recipients. Thus, IO may be less prevalent among recipients of auto-HSCT compared to allo-HSCT as expected [21].

The main causes of IO in HSCT are prolonged dyserythropoiesis, increased intestinal iron absorbtion due to anemia and chemotherapy associated mucositis which leads to increased

Iron overload is particularly common in HSCT recipients with hemoglobinopathies and hematological malignancies which require frequent transfusions and is associated with inef‐ fective erythropoesis such as acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Trans‐ fusion load is considered to be the principal cause of IO in this group, as each unit of packed red blood cells (PRBC) contains approximately 200–250 mg iron. Since there is no physiolog‐ ical mechanism for excreting excess iron, iron accumulation is inevitable after 10–20 transfu‐ sions [22-24]. Ineffective erythropoiesis might be a contributing factor leading to excessive iron absorbtion particularly in MDS and thalassemia which is mediated by erythroid regula‐ tors of iron metabolism which suppress hepcidin and result in increased iron absorbtion. Elevated growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF–15) levels are considered to be the initiating event in this context. Ineffective erythropoiesis either as a feature of the underlying disease or a consequence of intensive treatment leads to inhibition of hepcidin possibly due to over‐ expression of GDF–15 and thus increases iron absorbtion and toxicity. Hematopoietic SCT recipients are at risk of IO due to prior transfusion load, increased iron absorbtion related to

Bone marrow (BM) and tumor cell destruction which occurs as a consequence of high dose therapy and release of iron from damaged cells as well as underutilization of iron due to the

iron absorbtion, transfusion burden and release of iron from injured tissues [8, 22].

elevated GDF–15 levels and peri–tansplant transfusions [22, 24, 25].

rum ferritin levels regardless of the iron stores [12].

**2.2. Iron overload and stem cell transplantation**

308 Innovations in Stem Cell Transplantation


likely to experience disease relapse. Thus the association of elevated ferritin levels with re‐

Iron Overload and Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/53819

311

The adverse impact of IO on transplant outcome has been demonstrated most convincingly in patients with thalassemia where class III patients with extensive liver damage had higher TRM [38]. Besides increased TRM, other complications attributed to IO includes fungal in‐ fections, hepatic dysfunction and hepatic SOS/Veno occlusive disease (VOD) [4, 27, 38, 39]. In fact, thalassemia is a benign disorder and ferritin is directly a marker of excess iron and elevated levels could not be attributed to the biology of an underlying malignant pathology. As a result of the above mentioned data, pre–transplant serum ferritin was included in a prognostic scoring system for acute leukemia and MDS patients undergoing allo–HSCT [40]. The late morbidity of IO is primarily due to the involvement of heart and liver. Although iron related liver function test (LFT) abnormalities have been reported, there are no studies that describe the role of IO in late onset cardiomyopathy and hepatic fibrosis/cirrhosis in pa‐ tients transplanted for diseases other than thalassemia. Post–transplant iron depletion thera‐ py has been shown to reverse hepatic fibrosis and cardiomyopathy in children with

Liver disease is a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality following allo–HSCT and af‐ fects 90% of recipients and up to 5–10% of toxic deaths are liver related. Liver injury in the early post–transplant period may be secondary to drug toxicity, SOS, acute GVHD, oppor‐ tunistic infections, total parenteral nutrition, tumor invasion and cholestatic disorders [3, 41]. Long term liver disease is also a common complication of HSCT, as 57, 5% of survivors developed chronic liver disease (CLD) at 2 years after transplantation in a retrospective ser‐ ies of 106 patients reported by Tomas et al. In this retrospective study, the combination of chronic hepatitis C and IO was presented as the most frequent cause of CLD [41]. On the other hand, chronic GVHD also contributes to liver toxicity. The timing and pattern of LFT abnormalities, history of pre or post transplantation hepatitis, presence of GVHD at other sites and transfusion burden might be helpful in determining the etiology of liver disease. Accurate diagnosis of the etiology of liver dysfunction is generally problematic even though the patterns of biochemical, clinical and histological abnormalities can aid diagnosis. Liver biopsy in patients following HSCT is not without risks, particularly due to thrombocytope‐ nia during the early post–transplant period. The most common indication for liver biopsy is to assess the possibility of GVHD in allo–HSCT in the late post–transplant period with per‐ sistently abnormal LFTs and no evidence of GVHD on other sites. In this clinical setting, the sensitivity and specifity of serum ferritin as a marker of IO is not well defined due to its con‐ comittant role as an acute phase reactant [3, 5, 8, 24, 41-43]. Liver biopsy may be performed when atypical clinical features are present or multiple disease processes are likely to occur simultaneously or when there is poor response to therapy that has been instituted [44]. The management of liver dysfunction under these conditions may be complicated as overlap‐

lapse might be unrelated to IO.

thalassemia who have undergone allo–HSCT [4].

**2.3. Iron overload and transplant complications**

*2.3.1. Liver complications*

**Table 2.** The Role of IO in Early and Late Complications of HSCT [4]

Iron toxicity may play an important role in the pathogenesis of transplant related complica‐ tions [Table 1, 2]. In a series of 25 patients who underwent HSCT, very high levels of ferritin (>3000 ng/ml) and TS (>100%) dramatically increased transplant related mortality (TRM) and decreased overall survival (OS) which was particularly attributed to infections [32]. As iron is an essential element for all pathological microorganisms, excess amounts of free iron might increase microbial growth and the probability of severe infections [33]. The coexis‐ tence of excess plasma iron with the damage to the mucosal barrier may also predispose to infectious events with bacterial translocation. Hypoferraemia is a normal response to infec‐ tion and appears to be a part of a natural resistance mechanism whereas hyperferremia can predispose to bacterial and fungal infections. In this context, elevated TS and ferritin levels are proven risk factors for the development of systemic fungal infections in patients with hematological malignancies [1, 33, 34]. Furthermore, an increase in late fungal infections, es‐ pecially mucormycosis, has been reported in iron loaded patients after HSCT [35]. Elevated pre–transplant ferritin levels seem to effect prognosis adversely in myeloablative HSCT pri‐ marily due to increased NRM. On the other hand, elevated iron stores apart from providing a milieu for infection and organ toxicity, may also be in relevance to tumor growth. Thus elevated ferritin levels might be in association with relapse and relapse mortality [36]. Ma‐ hindra et al reported that elevated pre–transplant serum ferritin level was an independent adverse risk factor for OS in patients undergoing non myeloablative HSCT. Inferior survival in patients with elevated ferritin was related to both higher rates of treatment related mor‐ tality and relapse mortality [37]. On the other hand it should also be noted that ferritin is an acute phase reactant and a marker of inflammation besides its role as a surrogate marker of iron status. Thus, elevated ferritin levels might as well indicate a group of patients with more agressive primary disease biology and a subgroup of patients who are already more likely to experience disease relapse. Thus the association of elevated ferritin levels with re‐ lapse might be unrelated to IO.

The adverse impact of IO on transplant outcome has been demonstrated most convincingly in patients with thalassemia where class III patients with extensive liver damage had higher TRM [38]. Besides increased TRM, other complications attributed to IO includes fungal in‐ fections, hepatic dysfunction and hepatic SOS/Veno occlusive disease (VOD) [4, 27, 38, 39]. In fact, thalassemia is a benign disorder and ferritin is directly a marker of excess iron and elevated levels could not be attributed to the biology of an underlying malignant pathology. As a result of the above mentioned data, pre–transplant serum ferritin was included in a prognostic scoring system for acute leukemia and MDS patients undergoing allo–HSCT [40]. The late morbidity of IO is primarily due to the involvement of heart and liver. Although iron related liver function test (LFT) abnormalities have been reported, there are no studies that describe the role of IO in late onset cardiomyopathy and hepatic fibrosis/cirrhosis in pa‐ tients transplanted for diseases other than thalassemia. Post–transplant iron depletion thera‐ py has been shown to reverse hepatic fibrosis and cardiomyopathy in children with thalassemia who have undergone allo–HSCT [4].

#### **2.3. Iron overload and transplant complications**

#### *2.3.1. Liver complications*

**Complication Comments**

310 Innovations in Stem Cell Transplantation

**Infections Mucormycosis, invasive aspergillosis, listeria monocytogenes and other**

**NRM Elevated ferritin associated with increased risk in allo and auto-HSCT recipients**

**Chronic GVHD No clear evidence available, decreased risk reported with elevated ferritin**

Iron toxicity may play an important role in the pathogenesis of transplant related complica‐ tions [Table 1, 2]. In a series of 25 patients who underwent HSCT, very high levels of ferritin (>3000 ng/ml) and TS (>100%) dramatically increased transplant related mortality (TRM) and decreased overall survival (OS) which was particularly attributed to infections [32]. As iron is an essential element for all pathological microorganisms, excess amounts of free iron might increase microbial growth and the probability of severe infections [33]. The coexis‐ tence of excess plasma iron with the damage to the mucosal barrier may also predispose to infectious events with bacterial translocation. Hypoferraemia is a normal response to infec‐ tion and appears to be a part of a natural resistance mechanism whereas hyperferremia can predispose to bacterial and fungal infections. In this context, elevated TS and ferritin levels are proven risk factors for the development of systemic fungal infections in patients with hematological malignancies [1, 33, 34]. Furthermore, an increase in late fungal infections, es‐ pecially mucormycosis, has been reported in iron loaded patients after HSCT [35]. Elevated pre–transplant ferritin levels seem to effect prognosis adversely in myeloablative HSCT pri‐ marily due to increased NRM. On the other hand, elevated iron stores apart from providing a milieu for infection and organ toxicity, may also be in relevance to tumor growth. Thus elevated ferritin levels might be in association with relapse and relapse mortality [36]. Ma‐ hindra et al reported that elevated pre–transplant serum ferritin level was an independent adverse risk factor for OS in patients undergoing non myeloablative HSCT. Inferior survival in patients with elevated ferritin was related to both higher rates of treatment related mor‐ tality and relapse mortality [37]. On the other hand it should also be noted that ferritin is an acute phase reactant and a marker of inflammation besides its role as a surrogate marker of iron status. Thus, elevated ferritin levels might as well indicate a group of patients with more agressive primary disease biology and a subgroup of patients who are already more

**Acute GVHD No clear evidence available, elevated ferritin might increase risk**

**Infections Mucormycosis, invasive aspergillosis and other infections**

**infections**

**SOS Iron overload might increase risk**

**Liver Function Abnormalities Iron overload increases risk Cardiac Late Effects Iron overload might increase risk NRM No clear evidence available**

**Table 2.** The Role of IO in Early and Late Complications of HSCT [4]

**Early (<1 year)**

**Late ("/>1 year)**

Liver disease is a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality following allo–HSCT and af‐ fects 90% of recipients and up to 5–10% of toxic deaths are liver related. Liver injury in the early post–transplant period may be secondary to drug toxicity, SOS, acute GVHD, oppor‐ tunistic infections, total parenteral nutrition, tumor invasion and cholestatic disorders [3, 41]. Long term liver disease is also a common complication of HSCT, as 57, 5% of survivors developed chronic liver disease (CLD) at 2 years after transplantation in a retrospective ser‐ ies of 106 patients reported by Tomas et al. In this retrospective study, the combination of chronic hepatitis C and IO was presented as the most frequent cause of CLD [41]. On the other hand, chronic GVHD also contributes to liver toxicity. The timing and pattern of LFT abnormalities, history of pre or post transplantation hepatitis, presence of GVHD at other sites and transfusion burden might be helpful in determining the etiology of liver disease. Accurate diagnosis of the etiology of liver dysfunction is generally problematic even though the patterns of biochemical, clinical and histological abnormalities can aid diagnosis. Liver biopsy in patients following HSCT is not without risks, particularly due to thrombocytope‐ nia during the early post–transplant period. The most common indication for liver biopsy is to assess the possibility of GVHD in allo–HSCT in the late post–transplant period with per‐ sistently abnormal LFTs and no evidence of GVHD on other sites. In this clinical setting, the sensitivity and specifity of serum ferritin as a marker of IO is not well defined due to its con‐ comittant role as an acute phase reactant [3, 5, 8, 24, 41-43]. Liver biopsy may be performed when atypical clinical features are present or multiple disease processes are likely to occur simultaneously or when there is poor response to therapy that has been instituted [44]. The management of liver dysfunction under these conditions may be complicated as overlap‐ ping features often complicate the diagnosis and establishing the correct diagnosis is crucial to institute disease specific therapy. Autopsies performed in 10 patients who died early after HSCT showed iron accumulation in a range equivalent to that of patients suffering from HH [26]. A cumulative cirrhosis incidence of 3, 8% by 20 years after HSCT has been reported previously [8]. This rate seems to be an underestimation as the majority of long term survi‐ vors have not been subjected to liver biopsy. In a retrospective study by Sucak et al, severe IO was demonstrated in 75% of 24 liver biopsies which were performed with the presump‐ tive diagnosis of hepatic GVHD in 20 patients with persistent elevation of liver enzymes in the post–transplant setting. The initial clinical diagnosis of GVHD was refuted in 43, 5% of the patients. Median number of post–transplant transfusions, TS and ferritin levels were found to be significantly higher in patients who had histologically proven hepatic IO. A sig‐ nificant correlation between serum ferritin levels and histological grade of iron in the hepa‐ tocytes was also demonstrated [10]. In another study by Iqbal et al, the diagnosis obtained at laparoscopic liver biopsies altered targeted therapy in 31% of patients. Iron overload was found in 81, 25% of a total of 32 biopsies [45]. A diagnosis of IO after HSCT was demonstrat‐ ed based on histological evidence of siderosis found in 52, 4% of liver biopsies performed at 15–110 days post-transplant in another study. Liver biopsies were performed for diagnostic purposes in patients with chronic liver dysfunction. An improvement in LFT was observed in 21 of the 23 patients (91%) with IO who underwent phlebotomy [41]. Namely, IO seems to be underestimated as a cause of liver dysfunction in HSCT setting and liver biopsy which allows disease specific therapy could be life saving.

study, SOS was defined in 12, 2% of patients based on McDonald criteria. Patients with pre–transplant ferritin levels above 300 mg/dl were shown to have a higher risk of devel‐ oping SOS [48]. In a recent report by Maradei et al, a pre–transplant serum ferritin level above 1000 ng/dl was identified as an independent risk factor for the development of SOS [39]. A retrospective study of 250 HSCT recipients by Sucak et al, in which SOS in‐ cidence was reported to be 29, 7%, demonstrated significantly higher pre–transplant se‐ rum ferritin levels in patients with SOS [49]. In another study reported by Sucak et al, pre–transplant ferritin levels were found to be higher in HSCT recipients who developed SOS in the post–transplant setting [50]. Serum ferritin may be increased in conditions other than IO in this particular group of patients, including chronic inflammation and in‐ fection. Nevertheless, values higher than 1000 ng/ml were rarely reported in these in‐

Iron Overload and Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/53819

313

Iron induced hepatotoxicity is multifactorial which involves oxidative stress and modula‐ tion of gene expression of Kuppfer cells. Cellular injury is induced by iron generated ROS and peroxidation of lipid membranes [39]. Risk factors associated with the development of SOS are defined as preexisting liver dysfunction, previous abdominal irradiation, high dose total body irradiation, high dose preperative regimens, advanced disease and HLA mis‐ match or unrelated HSCT. The typical hepatocellular lesion of SOS mainly occurs in zone 3 of hepatic acines including a characteristic endothelial lesion which is shown to be associat‐ ed with hypercoagulability. The oxidant effect of iron on endothelial and and hepatocyte membranes mediated by ROS contributes to the development of these typical lesions of SOS [48, 50]. The risk of SOS is higher in carriers of at least one allele of the hemochromatosis

Patients with HH and other diseases with IO are considered to be more susceptible to infec‐ tions, as iron adversely affects the phagocytic, chemotactic and bactericidal capacity of gran‐ ulocytes and monocytes and inhibits the activity of natural killer cells and macrophages [35, 52]. A number of studies have demonstrated the adverse impact of IO on the development infections in HSCT recipients. Tachibana et al observed an association between IO and blood stream infections (BSI) in 114 patients who underwent allo–HSCT. They found that pre– transplant serum ferritin levels significantly predicted BSI within the 100–day period after allo–HSCT [1]. A direct correlation between hepatic IO and BSI was demonstrated in a retro‐ spective cohort of 154 allo – HSCT recipients, as patients with hepatic IO tended to experi‐ ence more frequent and prolonged episodes of lethal BSI [53]. Altes et al reported a ferritin level above 1500 µg/l was associated with the occurence of bacteremia and febrile days in first 3 months after auto–HSCT [27]. A prospective study investigated the risk factors for 140 early infection episodes which occured in 367 multiple myeloma (MM) patients undergoing auto–HSCT. Bone marrow iron stores were identified as significant risk factors for early se‐ vere infections [54]. Pre–transplant serum ferritin levels were demonstrated to be associated with fungal infections after allo–HSCT in several studies [33-35, 49, 55, 56]. Tunçcan et al identified the predictive role of pre–transplant serum ferritin level in the development of

flammatory conditions [1, 25, 29, 39, 48-51].

*2.3.3. Infections*

gene, HFE, which predisposes to iron deposition in the liver [24].

Hepatic IO may also worsen the natural course of chronic viral hepatitis and the response to antiviral therapy. Fujita et al demonstrated that liver iron deposition was more common in chronic hepatitis C compared to hepatitis B and was associated with liver disease progres‐ sion. Increased hepatic iron stores in chronic hepatitis C were related to resistance to Inter‐ feron/Ribavirin treatment [46]. Thalassemic patients with liver fibrosis and hepatomegaly who undergo HSCT, have a markedly reduced OS and event free survival compared to pa‐ tients without evidence of liver disease. The liver disease in these patients is due to a combi‐ nation of severe IO and chronic viral hepatitis both of which improve with effective iron chelation therapy [19, 26, 47]. Iron is also deposited in other tissues such as myocardium or BM. Slow and spontaneous decrease in iron stores has been reported in thalassemic children in the years following HSCT. This natural iron depletion could normalize iron stores in indi‐ viduals with mild siderosis. However, in patients with moderate to severe IO this slow de‐ pletion could not prevent the development of liver dysfunction. For this reason, iron depletion protocols have been developed for patients with severe IO [19, 23, 26, 47].

#### *2.3.2. Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (veno occlusive disease)*

Sinosoidal obstruction syndrome is a treatment related toxicity associated with auto and al‐ lo–HSCT which is seen in 6–54 % of the recipients. The severity of SOS ranges from a mild reversible to a progressive course with a mortality rate close to 100% [5, 24].

The role of pre–transplant hyperferritinemia in the development of SOS was first demon‐ strated by Morado et al in a cohort of 180 auto–HSCT recipients. In this prospective study, SOS was defined in 12, 2% of patients based on McDonald criteria. Patients with pre–transplant ferritin levels above 300 mg/dl were shown to have a higher risk of devel‐ oping SOS [48]. In a recent report by Maradei et al, a pre–transplant serum ferritin level above 1000 ng/dl was identified as an independent risk factor for the development of SOS [39]. A retrospective study of 250 HSCT recipients by Sucak et al, in which SOS in‐ cidence was reported to be 29, 7%, demonstrated significantly higher pre–transplant se‐ rum ferritin levels in patients with SOS [49]. In another study reported by Sucak et al, pre–transplant ferritin levels were found to be higher in HSCT recipients who developed SOS in the post–transplant setting [50]. Serum ferritin may be increased in conditions other than IO in this particular group of patients, including chronic inflammation and in‐ fection. Nevertheless, values higher than 1000 ng/ml were rarely reported in these in‐ flammatory conditions [1, 25, 29, 39, 48-51].

Iron induced hepatotoxicity is multifactorial which involves oxidative stress and modula‐ tion of gene expression of Kuppfer cells. Cellular injury is induced by iron generated ROS and peroxidation of lipid membranes [39]. Risk factors associated with the development of SOS are defined as preexisting liver dysfunction, previous abdominal irradiation, high dose total body irradiation, high dose preperative regimens, advanced disease and HLA mis‐ match or unrelated HSCT. The typical hepatocellular lesion of SOS mainly occurs in zone 3 of hepatic acines including a characteristic endothelial lesion which is shown to be associat‐ ed with hypercoagulability. The oxidant effect of iron on endothelial and and hepatocyte membranes mediated by ROS contributes to the development of these typical lesions of SOS [48, 50]. The risk of SOS is higher in carriers of at least one allele of the hemochromatosis gene, HFE, which predisposes to iron deposition in the liver [24].

#### *2.3.3. Infections*

ping features often complicate the diagnosis and establishing the correct diagnosis is crucial to institute disease specific therapy. Autopsies performed in 10 patients who died early after HSCT showed iron accumulation in a range equivalent to that of patients suffering from HH [26]. A cumulative cirrhosis incidence of 3, 8% by 20 years after HSCT has been reported previously [8]. This rate seems to be an underestimation as the majority of long term survi‐ vors have not been subjected to liver biopsy. In a retrospective study by Sucak et al, severe IO was demonstrated in 75% of 24 liver biopsies which were performed with the presump‐ tive diagnosis of hepatic GVHD in 20 patients with persistent elevation of liver enzymes in the post–transplant setting. The initial clinical diagnosis of GVHD was refuted in 43, 5% of the patients. Median number of post–transplant transfusions, TS and ferritin levels were found to be significantly higher in patients who had histologically proven hepatic IO. A sig‐ nificant correlation between serum ferritin levels and histological grade of iron in the hepa‐ tocytes was also demonstrated [10]. In another study by Iqbal et al, the diagnosis obtained at laparoscopic liver biopsies altered targeted therapy in 31% of patients. Iron overload was found in 81, 25% of a total of 32 biopsies [45]. A diagnosis of IO after HSCT was demonstrat‐ ed based on histological evidence of siderosis found in 52, 4% of liver biopsies performed at 15–110 days post-transplant in another study. Liver biopsies were performed for diagnostic purposes in patients with chronic liver dysfunction. An improvement in LFT was observed in 21 of the 23 patients (91%) with IO who underwent phlebotomy [41]. Namely, IO seems to be underestimated as a cause of liver dysfunction in HSCT setting and liver biopsy which

Hepatic IO may also worsen the natural course of chronic viral hepatitis and the response to antiviral therapy. Fujita et al demonstrated that liver iron deposition was more common in chronic hepatitis C compared to hepatitis B and was associated with liver disease progres‐ sion. Increased hepatic iron stores in chronic hepatitis C were related to resistance to Inter‐ feron/Ribavirin treatment [46]. Thalassemic patients with liver fibrosis and hepatomegaly who undergo HSCT, have a markedly reduced OS and event free survival compared to pa‐ tients without evidence of liver disease. The liver disease in these patients is due to a combi‐ nation of severe IO and chronic viral hepatitis both of which improve with effective iron chelation therapy [19, 26, 47]. Iron is also deposited in other tissues such as myocardium or BM. Slow and spontaneous decrease in iron stores has been reported in thalassemic children in the years following HSCT. This natural iron depletion could normalize iron stores in indi‐ viduals with mild siderosis. However, in patients with moderate to severe IO this slow de‐ pletion could not prevent the development of liver dysfunction. For this reason, iron

depletion protocols have been developed for patients with severe IO [19, 23, 26, 47].

reversible to a progressive course with a mortality rate close to 100% [5, 24].

Sinosoidal obstruction syndrome is a treatment related toxicity associated with auto and al‐ lo–HSCT which is seen in 6–54 % of the recipients. The severity of SOS ranges from a mild

The role of pre–transplant hyperferritinemia in the development of SOS was first demon‐ strated by Morado et al in a cohort of 180 auto–HSCT recipients. In this prospective

allows disease specific therapy could be life saving.

312 Innovations in Stem Cell Transplantation

*2.3.2. Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (veno occlusive disease)*

Patients with HH and other diseases with IO are considered to be more susceptible to infec‐ tions, as iron adversely affects the phagocytic, chemotactic and bactericidal capacity of gran‐ ulocytes and monocytes and inhibits the activity of natural killer cells and macrophages [35, 52]. A number of studies have demonstrated the adverse impact of IO on the development infections in HSCT recipients. Tachibana et al observed an association between IO and blood stream infections (BSI) in 114 patients who underwent allo–HSCT. They found that pre– transplant serum ferritin levels significantly predicted BSI within the 100–day period after allo–HSCT [1]. A direct correlation between hepatic IO and BSI was demonstrated in a retro‐ spective cohort of 154 allo – HSCT recipients, as patients with hepatic IO tended to experi‐ ence more frequent and prolonged episodes of lethal BSI [53]. Altes et al reported a ferritin level above 1500 µg/l was associated with the occurence of bacteremia and febrile days in first 3 months after auto–HSCT [27]. A prospective study investigated the risk factors for 140 early infection episodes which occured in 367 multiple myeloma (MM) patients undergoing auto–HSCT. Bone marrow iron stores were identified as significant risk factors for early se‐ vere infections [54]. Pre–transplant serum ferritin levels were demonstrated to be associated with fungal infections after allo–HSCT in several studies [33-35, 49, 55, 56]. Tunçcan et al identified the predictive role of pre–transplant serum ferritin level in the development of hepatosplenic candidiasis among 255 HSCT recipients. Hepatosplenic candidiasis was diag‐ nosed in 6 (2, 3%) patients. Pre–transplant serum ferritin levels were significantly higher in patients with hepatosplenic candidiasis [55]. Özyilmaz et al studied the relationship be‐ tween serum ferritin level and pulmonary fungal infections in 148 allo – HSCT recipients. In this study, the sensitivity and specifity of ferritin > 1000 ng/ml for the prediction of fungal pulmonary infections were found to be 67% and 70%, respectively [56].

that IO might be the consequence rather than being the cause of intestinal GVHD [23]. The liver and the intestinal mucosa, which express essential iron regulatory genes includ‐ ing hepatic antimicrobial protein (HAMP), the gene that encodes hepcidin and ferropor‐ tin 1, are targets of conditioning related toxicity as well as GVHD, initiated by donor derived T lymphocytes. The ensuing release of cytokines including IL-6, might directly affect the expression of hepcidin as IL-6 is a potent inducer of hepcidin via STAT3 [61]. Graft versus host disease also involves the interaction of Fas ligand expressed on activat‐ ed donor T lymphocytes with host tissue including enterocytes and hepatocytes. T lym‐ phocyte induced tissue damage disrupts iron homeostasis leading to uncontrolled iron accumulation which may aggravate tissue damage related to the development of GVHD and infections [15]. The pattern of the relationship between IO and GVHD remains to be

Iron Overload and Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/53819

315

Several recent reports demonstrated that IO is an adverse prognostic factor for patients un‐ dergoing allo–HSCT [1, 17, 22, 36, 59, 62-66]. In a retrospective cohort of 114 AML and MDS patients, the OS rate at 5 years was found to be significantly better in patients with ferritin levels < 1000 ng/ml [1]. Tanaka et al evaluated the outcome of 47 patients with acute leuke‐ mia or MDS who underwent reduced intensity HSCT. High ferritin level which was defined as >1000 ng/ml was associated with worse 2 year OS on multivariate analysis [62]. Another study by the same group demonstrated the adverse impact of elevated ferritin levels on 5 year OS in a cohort of 143 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute mye‐ loblastic leukemia (AML) who received allo–HSCT with myeloablative and non myeloabla‐ tive conditioning regimens [63]. Transfusion dependency, predicted by serum ferritin levels, was found to be independently associated with reduced OS and increased NRM in a retro‐ spective cohort of 357 MDS patients undergoing allo–HSCT [60]. The transplant iron score which included serum ferritin level above 1000 ng/ml was tested in 78 patients who received allo or auto–HSCT. The independent impact of IO on transplant survival was indicated with the most pronounced predictive power of the iron score restricted to allo–HSCT recipients. A high iron score (≥2) was associated with 50% absolute decrease in OS at 1 year [67]. Lim et al reported the adverse impact of elevated serum ferritin on OS in 99 MDS patients who un‐ derwent reduced intensity HSCT [64]. Altes et al demonstrated that serum ferritin levels ≥3000 µg/l and TS ≥100% were associated with a decreased OS and increased TRM, which was attributed to a high infectious mortality [32]. On the other hand Pullarkat et al analyzed 190 patients and demonstrated that elevated pre–transplant ferritin levels were associated with increased risk of death and day 100 mortality, mainly due to acute GVHD and infec‐ tions [38]. Mahindra et al demonstrated a pre–transplant serum ferritin > 685 ng/ml was as‐ sociated with lower OS and relapse free survival in 315 patients with Hodgkin and non Hodgkin lymphoma who received auto–HSCT, whereas same ferritin level exhibited a high‐ er incidence of relapse and relapse mortality. They identified the baseline ferritin level was best correlated with poor survival. They concluded that elevated iron stores may also in‐ crease tumor growth, as tumor cells require more iron for DNA synthesis due to rapid pro‐ liferation [36]. Same group confirmed their results in a study of 222 allo–HSCT recipients

confirmed in future studies.

**2.4. Prognostic role of iron overload in stem cell transplantation**

#### *2.3.4. Idiopathic Pneumonia Syndrome (IPS)*

Idiopathic pneumonia syndrome comprises a group of disorders that result in interstitial pneumonitis and/or widespread alveolar injury with an incidence of 2–8 % and a mortality of up to 70% in the HSCT setting. There is increasing evidence implicating ROS and pro– inflammatory events as major contributing factors to IPS [5, 24]. The mechanism of iron in‐ duced IPS probably involves endothelial injury by catalytically active iron released from heme groups, which can trigger a cascade of events leading to acute lung injury and pulmo‐ nary fibrosis [24]. Currently, there are no studies regarding the direct association of IO and IPS, except the oxidative milieu, which is partly a consequence of IO.

#### *2.3.5. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)*

The role of IO in the pathogenesis of GVHD has been evaluated in a number of studies. There are conflicting results regarding the relationship between IO and GVHD in HSCT recipients. In a prospective cohort of 190 allo – HSCT recipients reported by Pullarkat et al, the effect of elevated pre–transplant ferritin on acute GVHD was assessed. Grade 2 or above acute GVHD was diagnosed in 48% of patients. Acute GVHD was more frequent in patients with high ferritin levels (≥1000 ng/ml). This was attributed to the increased ROS mediated injury on exposure to the conditioning regimen in iron overloaded pa‐ tients, as antigen exposition following tissue injury was indicated to be the initiating event in the pathogenesis of GVHD [38]. Similarly in a report by Platzbecker et al, which was performed in 172 patients with MDS, transfusion burden reflected by ferritin levels, was found to be correlated with a higher probability of acute GVHD [57]. On the other hand, Mahindra et al investigated 222 patients who underwent myeloablative allo–HSCT and demonstrated that pre–transplant ferritin level >1910 µg/l was associated with de‐ creased incidence of chronic GVHD [58]. Furthermore, in a study of 264 patients who underwent allo–HSCT for various hematological malignancies, no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of acute and chronic GVHD was demonstrated in high (≥599 ng/ml) and low (<599 ng/ml) ferritin groups [59]. Alessandrino et al reported that trans‐ fusion dependency was an independent risk factor for the development of acute GVHD, but not for chronic GVHD [60]. On the other hand, IO might as well mimic GVHD re‐ sulting in unnecessary continuation or intensification of immunosuppressive therapy for GVHD [18]. Apart from hepatocellular, cardiac and other organ dysfunction, IO may worsen the natural course of liver GVHD, similar to the status with chronic hepatitis and its response to therapy [3, 18, 23, 51, 57]. It is speculated that intestinal iron absorbtion is increased as a result of epithelial injury related to chemotherapy or GVHD. Suggesting that IO might be the consequence rather than being the cause of intestinal GVHD [23]. The liver and the intestinal mucosa, which express essential iron regulatory genes includ‐ ing hepatic antimicrobial protein (HAMP), the gene that encodes hepcidin and ferropor‐ tin 1, are targets of conditioning related toxicity as well as GVHD, initiated by donor derived T lymphocytes. The ensuing release of cytokines including IL-6, might directly affect the expression of hepcidin as IL-6 is a potent inducer of hepcidin via STAT3 [61]. Graft versus host disease also involves the interaction of Fas ligand expressed on activat‐ ed donor T lymphocytes with host tissue including enterocytes and hepatocytes. T lym‐ phocyte induced tissue damage disrupts iron homeostasis leading to uncontrolled iron accumulation which may aggravate tissue damage related to the development of GVHD and infections [15]. The pattern of the relationship between IO and GVHD remains to be confirmed in future studies.

#### **2.4. Prognostic role of iron overload in stem cell transplantation**

hepatosplenic candidiasis among 255 HSCT recipients. Hepatosplenic candidiasis was diag‐ nosed in 6 (2, 3%) patients. Pre–transplant serum ferritin levels were significantly higher in patients with hepatosplenic candidiasis [55]. Özyilmaz et al studied the relationship be‐ tween serum ferritin level and pulmonary fungal infections in 148 allo – HSCT recipients. In this study, the sensitivity and specifity of ferritin > 1000 ng/ml for the prediction of fungal

Idiopathic pneumonia syndrome comprises a group of disorders that result in interstitial pneumonitis and/or widespread alveolar injury with an incidence of 2–8 % and a mortality of up to 70% in the HSCT setting. There is increasing evidence implicating ROS and pro– inflammatory events as major contributing factors to IPS [5, 24]. The mechanism of iron in‐ duced IPS probably involves endothelial injury by catalytically active iron released from heme groups, which can trigger a cascade of events leading to acute lung injury and pulmo‐ nary fibrosis [24]. Currently, there are no studies regarding the direct association of IO and

The role of IO in the pathogenesis of GVHD has been evaluated in a number of studies. There are conflicting results regarding the relationship between IO and GVHD in HSCT recipients. In a prospective cohort of 190 allo – HSCT recipients reported by Pullarkat et al, the effect of elevated pre–transplant ferritin on acute GVHD was assessed. Grade 2 or above acute GVHD was diagnosed in 48% of patients. Acute GVHD was more frequent in patients with high ferritin levels (≥1000 ng/ml). This was attributed to the increased ROS mediated injury on exposure to the conditioning regimen in iron overloaded pa‐ tients, as antigen exposition following tissue injury was indicated to be the initiating event in the pathogenesis of GVHD [38]. Similarly in a report by Platzbecker et al, which was performed in 172 patients with MDS, transfusion burden reflected by ferritin levels, was found to be correlated with a higher probability of acute GVHD [57]. On the other hand, Mahindra et al investigated 222 patients who underwent myeloablative allo–HSCT and demonstrated that pre–transplant ferritin level >1910 µg/l was associated with de‐ creased incidence of chronic GVHD [58]. Furthermore, in a study of 264 patients who underwent allo–HSCT for various hematological malignancies, no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of acute and chronic GVHD was demonstrated in high (≥599 ng/ml) and low (<599 ng/ml) ferritin groups [59]. Alessandrino et al reported that trans‐ fusion dependency was an independent risk factor for the development of acute GVHD, but not for chronic GVHD [60]. On the other hand, IO might as well mimic GVHD re‐ sulting in unnecessary continuation or intensification of immunosuppressive therapy for GVHD [18]. Apart from hepatocellular, cardiac and other organ dysfunction, IO may worsen the natural course of liver GVHD, similar to the status with chronic hepatitis and its response to therapy [3, 18, 23, 51, 57]. It is speculated that intestinal iron absorbtion is increased as a result of epithelial injury related to chemotherapy or GVHD. Suggesting

pulmonary infections were found to be 67% and 70%, respectively [56].

IPS, except the oxidative milieu, which is partly a consequence of IO.

*2.3.4. Idiopathic Pneumonia Syndrome (IPS)*

314 Innovations in Stem Cell Transplantation

*2.3.5. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)*

Several recent reports demonstrated that IO is an adverse prognostic factor for patients un‐ dergoing allo–HSCT [1, 17, 22, 36, 59, 62-66]. In a retrospective cohort of 114 AML and MDS patients, the OS rate at 5 years was found to be significantly better in patients with ferritin levels < 1000 ng/ml [1]. Tanaka et al evaluated the outcome of 47 patients with acute leuke‐ mia or MDS who underwent reduced intensity HSCT. High ferritin level which was defined as >1000 ng/ml was associated with worse 2 year OS on multivariate analysis [62]. Another study by the same group demonstrated the adverse impact of elevated ferritin levels on 5 year OS in a cohort of 143 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute mye‐ loblastic leukemia (AML) who received allo–HSCT with myeloablative and non myeloabla‐ tive conditioning regimens [63]. Transfusion dependency, predicted by serum ferritin levels, was found to be independently associated with reduced OS and increased NRM in a retro‐ spective cohort of 357 MDS patients undergoing allo–HSCT [60]. The transplant iron score which included serum ferritin level above 1000 ng/ml was tested in 78 patients who received allo or auto–HSCT. The independent impact of IO on transplant survival was indicated with the most pronounced predictive power of the iron score restricted to allo–HSCT recipients. A high iron score (≥2) was associated with 50% absolute decrease in OS at 1 year [67]. Lim et al reported the adverse impact of elevated serum ferritin on OS in 99 MDS patients who un‐ derwent reduced intensity HSCT [64]. Altes et al demonstrated that serum ferritin levels ≥3000 µg/l and TS ≥100% were associated with a decreased OS and increased TRM, which was attributed to a high infectious mortality [32]. On the other hand Pullarkat et al analyzed 190 patients and demonstrated that elevated pre–transplant ferritin levels were associated with increased risk of death and day 100 mortality, mainly due to acute GVHD and infec‐ tions [38]. Mahindra et al demonstrated a pre–transplant serum ferritin > 685 ng/ml was as‐ sociated with lower OS and relapse free survival in 315 patients with Hodgkin and non Hodgkin lymphoma who received auto–HSCT, whereas same ferritin level exhibited a high‐ er incidence of relapse and relapse mortality. They identified the baseline ferritin level was best correlated with poor survival. They concluded that elevated iron stores may also in‐ crease tumor growth, as tumor cells require more iron for DNA synthesis due to rapid pro‐ liferation [36]. Same group confirmed their results in a study of 222 allo–HSCT recipients with a serum ferritin level >1910 µg/l associated with lower OS, lower relapse free survival and higher NRM rates [58]. Furthermore they demonstrated inferior survival rates related to higher rates of TRM and relapse mortality in patients with elevated ferritin levels who re‐ ceived non myeloablative conditioning [37]. In a large retrospective study by Armand et al, an elevated pre–transplant serum ferritin level was significantly associated with lower OS and disease free survival. This association was particularly restricted to patients with acute leukemia and MDS which was particularly attributed to transfusion load. They suggested a possible role of iron chelation therapy in the pre and post – transplant setting, as they showed an absolute difference of 37% in 5–year OS for patients with MDS between the high‐ est and lowest ferritin quartiles [66]. Sucak et al demonstrated an adverse impact of a pre– transplant serum ferritin level >500 ng/ml on OS and TRM in 250 patients who received auto and allo–HSCT, underscoring the prognostic effect of IO in auto transplants [49]. The same group confirmed their results with a more toxic form of iron, NTBI, in a retrospective cohort of 149 patients. In concordance with the previous report, a significant impact of NTBI on day 30 and day 100 survival was shown in auto–transplanted patients for the first time in iron and transplant connection [29]. Notwithstanding, in a prospective study by Armand et al, pre–transplant IO predicted by LIC which is considered to be the gold standard indicator of IO, was not found to be associated with increased mortality, relapse, SOS or GVHD [68]. Therefore, they assumed that the adverse prognostic impact of pre–transplant hyperferriti‐ nemia may be related to factors independent of IO. Taken together, it is speculated that fer‐ ritin may be prognostic not because it reflects iron stores but because it is an acute phase reactant [68, 69].

*2.5.2. Non-invasive procedures*

limited availability [4, 9, 17].

*2.5.3. Ferritin*

Superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) assesses total body iron by using bi‐ omagnetic susceptometry. Ferritin and hemosiderin are the only paramagnetic materials in the human body, thus the magnitude of these parameters is directly related to the amount of iron in a certain volume of tissue. The device utilizes the magnetic property of iron in ferri‐ tin and hemosiderin to estimate hepatic iron stores. Furthermore, it is considered to be the non invasive reference standard for estimation of LIC as it has an excellent correlation with liver biopsy. However, widespread clinical use is limited by its cost, complexity and very

Iron Overload and Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/53819

317

Liver iron content measurement has limited predictive value for extrahepatic iron deposi‐ tion. The liver is the dominant iron reservoir for the body, accounting for more than 80% of the total body iron and has high capacity mechanisms for clearing both transferrin and NTBI species from the circulation. The heart and endocrine tissues have tightly regulated transfer‐ rin uptake and develop IO only when there is circulating NTBI. High liver iron (15-20 mg/g dry weight) damages liver parenchyma and increases circulating NTBI levels dramatically. As no liver iron can be considered safe from a cardiac and endocrinological perspective, ex‐ trahepatic monitoring by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential [71]. Magnetic reso‐ nance imaging becomes increasingly important in the evaluation of iron status as it is non invasive, more rapidly and widely available. Designating liver iron by older MRI techniques and equipment showed variable correlation with the biopsy estimates of LIC. More recent MRI techniques T2\* and R2\* MRI are reproducible methods for non invasive estimation of LIC with reported sensitivity and specifity of 89% and 80%, respectively [4, 17, 72-74]. It has the additional benefit of identifying relatively early IO within organs prior to the onset of dysfunction. Magnetic resonance imaging can be used to co-measure iron deposition within the heart, liver and pituitary gland as it does not appear that a single organ gives the full picture of total body IO. In fact, patients can accumulate cardiac iron, despite apparently normal hepatic iron levels and thus be at risk for arrhythmia or congestive heart failure. The discordance of values in two tissues can be resolved with the use of MRI to detect cardiac iron. Cardiovascular MRI could potentially be used not only to determine myocardial iron content but also cardiac function and therefore could be used to investigate the effects of iron mediated organ damage. Non invasive measurement of LIC has also been achieved us‐ ing an MRI technique based on the proton transverse relaxation rates within the liver. The technique can be implemented on, most clinical 1, 5–T MRI measurements, making it readily available to the clinical community. This technique resulted in a high specifity and sensitivi‐ ty over a greater range of LIC than any other MRI–based method of LIC assessment [9].

High prevalence of IO in long term survivors of HSCT emphasizes the need for routine screening for IO in this population. Ferritin is a cellular iron storage protein that buffers iron in a soluble and non toxic form. Under normal conditions ferritin levels in the se‐ rum are low but steadily increase in conditions of IO. Therefore, assessment of serum ferritin levels serves as a simple and widely used surrogate marker for IO. Serum ferri‐

#### **2.5. Diagnosis of iron overload**

#### *2.5.1. Liver biopsy*

Liver remains to be the most accessible parenchymal organ that can be used to estimate tis‐ sue iron load after HSCT. Iron overload is not uncommonly seen in various other primary liver diseases such as alcoholic liver disease, chronic viral hepatitis, non alcoholic steatohe‐ patitis, liver cirrhosis and HH. Histological evaluation of liver specimens is essential in the management of these disorders. The reported incidence of significant liver fibrosis in HSCT recipients varies from 5% to 80% and LIC has been demonstrated to have a particular role in the progression of fibrosis [26, 41, 70]. Though ferritin continues to be the mainstay for the initial clinical evaluation of IO, liver biopsy is still the gold standard for quantifying iron. Measurement of hepatic iron stores provides the most reliable estimate of body iron burden. Liver iron content exceeding 80 mcmol/g of liver dry weight was found to be consistent with IO with a hepatic index greater than 1, 9 mmol/kg/year. However, the need for a relatively large volume of tissue as well as its invasive nature has made this procedure less appealing to most clinicians and patients [4, 9, 53]. Although liver biopsy is an invasive procedure and can not be safely administered in patients with very low platelet counts, a liver biopsy can be advantageous in some HSCT recipients as it can also exclude alternative causes of hepatic dysfunction, such as infections and GVHD. In high risk patients, liver biopsy using a trans‐ juguler approach may be a feasible alternative to percutaneous biopsy [4, 17].

#### *2.5.2. Non-invasive procedures*

with a serum ferritin level >1910 µg/l associated with lower OS, lower relapse free survival and higher NRM rates [58]. Furthermore they demonstrated inferior survival rates related to higher rates of TRM and relapse mortality in patients with elevated ferritin levels who re‐ ceived non myeloablative conditioning [37]. In a large retrospective study by Armand et al, an elevated pre–transplant serum ferritin level was significantly associated with lower OS and disease free survival. This association was particularly restricted to patients with acute leukemia and MDS which was particularly attributed to transfusion load. They suggested a possible role of iron chelation therapy in the pre and post – transplant setting, as they showed an absolute difference of 37% in 5–year OS for patients with MDS between the high‐ est and lowest ferritin quartiles [66]. Sucak et al demonstrated an adverse impact of a pre– transplant serum ferritin level >500 ng/ml on OS and TRM in 250 patients who received auto and allo–HSCT, underscoring the prognostic effect of IO in auto transplants [49]. The same group confirmed their results with a more toxic form of iron, NTBI, in a retrospective cohort of 149 patients. In concordance with the previous report, a significant impact of NTBI on day 30 and day 100 survival was shown in auto–transplanted patients for the first time in iron and transplant connection [29]. Notwithstanding, in a prospective study by Armand et al, pre–transplant IO predicted by LIC which is considered to be the gold standard indicator of IO, was not found to be associated with increased mortality, relapse, SOS or GVHD [68]. Therefore, they assumed that the adverse prognostic impact of pre–transplant hyperferriti‐ nemia may be related to factors independent of IO. Taken together, it is speculated that fer‐ ritin may be prognostic not because it reflects iron stores but because it is an acute phase

Liver remains to be the most accessible parenchymal organ that can be used to estimate tis‐ sue iron load after HSCT. Iron overload is not uncommonly seen in various other primary liver diseases such as alcoholic liver disease, chronic viral hepatitis, non alcoholic steatohe‐ patitis, liver cirrhosis and HH. Histological evaluation of liver specimens is essential in the management of these disorders. The reported incidence of significant liver fibrosis in HSCT recipients varies from 5% to 80% and LIC has been demonstrated to have a particular role in the progression of fibrosis [26, 41, 70]. Though ferritin continues to be the mainstay for the initial clinical evaluation of IO, liver biopsy is still the gold standard for quantifying iron. Measurement of hepatic iron stores provides the most reliable estimate of body iron burden. Liver iron content exceeding 80 mcmol/g of liver dry weight was found to be consistent with IO with a hepatic index greater than 1, 9 mmol/kg/year. However, the need for a relatively large volume of tissue as well as its invasive nature has made this procedure less appealing to most clinicians and patients [4, 9, 53]. Although liver biopsy is an invasive procedure and can not be safely administered in patients with very low platelet counts, a liver biopsy can be advantageous in some HSCT recipients as it can also exclude alternative causes of hepatic dysfunction, such as infections and GVHD. In high risk patients, liver biopsy using a trans‐

juguler approach may be a feasible alternative to percutaneous biopsy [4, 17].

reactant [68, 69].

*2.5.1. Liver biopsy*

**2.5. Diagnosis of iron overload**

316 Innovations in Stem Cell Transplantation

Superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) assesses total body iron by using bi‐ omagnetic susceptometry. Ferritin and hemosiderin are the only paramagnetic materials in the human body, thus the magnitude of these parameters is directly related to the amount of iron in a certain volume of tissue. The device utilizes the magnetic property of iron in ferri‐ tin and hemosiderin to estimate hepatic iron stores. Furthermore, it is considered to be the non invasive reference standard for estimation of LIC as it has an excellent correlation with liver biopsy. However, widespread clinical use is limited by its cost, complexity and very limited availability [4, 9, 17].

Liver iron content measurement has limited predictive value for extrahepatic iron deposi‐ tion. The liver is the dominant iron reservoir for the body, accounting for more than 80% of the total body iron and has high capacity mechanisms for clearing both transferrin and NTBI species from the circulation. The heart and endocrine tissues have tightly regulated transfer‐ rin uptake and develop IO only when there is circulating NTBI. High liver iron (15-20 mg/g dry weight) damages liver parenchyma and increases circulating NTBI levels dramatically. As no liver iron can be considered safe from a cardiac and endocrinological perspective, ex‐ trahepatic monitoring by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential [71]. Magnetic reso‐ nance imaging becomes increasingly important in the evaluation of iron status as it is non invasive, more rapidly and widely available. Designating liver iron by older MRI techniques and equipment showed variable correlation with the biopsy estimates of LIC. More recent MRI techniques T2\* and R2\* MRI are reproducible methods for non invasive estimation of LIC with reported sensitivity and specifity of 89% and 80%, respectively [4, 17, 72-74]. It has the additional benefit of identifying relatively early IO within organs prior to the onset of dysfunction. Magnetic resonance imaging can be used to co-measure iron deposition within the heart, liver and pituitary gland as it does not appear that a single organ gives the full picture of total body IO. In fact, patients can accumulate cardiac iron, despite apparently normal hepatic iron levels and thus be at risk for arrhythmia or congestive heart failure. The discordance of values in two tissues can be resolved with the use of MRI to detect cardiac iron. Cardiovascular MRI could potentially be used not only to determine myocardial iron content but also cardiac function and therefore could be used to investigate the effects of iron mediated organ damage. Non invasive measurement of LIC has also been achieved us‐ ing an MRI technique based on the proton transverse relaxation rates within the liver. The technique can be implemented on, most clinical 1, 5–T MRI measurements, making it readily available to the clinical community. This technique resulted in a high specifity and sensitivi‐ ty over a greater range of LIC than any other MRI–based method of LIC assessment [9].

#### *2.5.3. Ferritin*

High prevalence of IO in long term survivors of HSCT emphasizes the need for routine screening for IO in this population. Ferritin is a cellular iron storage protein that buffers iron in a soluble and non toxic form. Under normal conditions ferritin levels in the se‐ rum are low but steadily increase in conditions of IO. Therefore, assessment of serum ferritin levels serves as a simple and widely used surrogate marker for IO. Serum ferri‐ tin levels are however subject to natural fluctuation and can also be greatly affected by a range of inflammatory conditions that are particularly relevant in HSCT recipients. Al‐ though being a useful test for initial screening of IO in HSCT recipients, serum ferritin is not a reliable indicator of total body iron burden particularly in patients who have ongo‐ ing acute infections or inflammatory diseases [2, 4, 17, 20, 22, 23, 38, 75, 76]. Serial serum ferritin measurements can compensate the potential fluctuations and help to establish a general picture of IO over time. Nevertheless, at 1 year after–transplantation when in‐ flammatory stress has largely subsided, most patients have a serum ferritin of <1000 ng/ml and no clinical evidence of IO; serum ferritin in these patients decline slowly with time [23]. Unlike tissue ferritin a substantial proportion of serum ferritin is glycosylated which suggests that plasma ferritin is actively secreted from reticuloendothelial system or parencymal cells. Serum ferritin in contrast to tissue ferritin was claimed to have a low iron content even in iron loaded patients in some earlier studies. It is therefore claimed that serum ferritin does not provide a major source of hepatic iron either in nor‐ mal individuals or in patients with IO diseases [4, 20, 22, 23, 75]. On the contrary a di‐ rect correlation between serum ferritin levels and transfusion burden has been observed with a level of 1000 ng/ml after a median of 21 PRBC transfusions. Thus repeated meas‐ urement of serum ferritin levels seems to be a valid method to monitor secondary IO in patients with transfusion dependent anemias and MDS [17]. Majhail et al studied the prevalence of IO in 56 allo–HSCT recipients and demonstrated the poor predictive value of ferritin for estimating LIC. The overall prevalence of IO was 32%. Clinically signifi‐ cant IO (LIC>7 mg/g) was uncommon in patients with serum ferritin levels less than 1000 ng/ml. However, the LIC on MRI was moderately correlated with serum ferritin. As a result, they indicated ferritin to be a good screening test but a poor predictor of tissue IO and recommended estimation of LIC before initiating chelation therapy. They consid‐ ered that this lack of association between ferritin and LIC might be related to the varia‐ bility in ferritin levels because of ineffective erythropoiesis or underlying inflammation or infection [20]. Whereas in a study by Bazuave et al, serum ferritin, transferrin, TS, iron, soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) and C reactive protein levels in 230 HSCT recipi‐ ents were measured. All iron parameters were found to be significantly associated with survival. A combination of ferritin and TS was shown to have the highest prognostic power. They concluded that the predictive power of ferritin was derived from its associ‐ ation with IO rather than inflammation. Inferior survival in patients with IO was related to both TRM and relapse. As sTfR and TS were found to have superior prognostic value when compared to ferritin, they suggested to combine serum ferritin with TS for predic‐ tion of IO [2].

**Diagnostic Test Advantages Disadvantages**

hepatic fibrosis, can evaluate other causes of

Invasive procedure, not feasible in patients with

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/53819

319

Iron Overload and Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation

Variety of MRI techniqueshave not been validated with liver biopsy, contraindications (metal

thrombocytopenia or coagulopathy

Very limited availability

implants, claustrophobia)

with liver biopsy

Noninvasive, widely available Sensitive but not specific for IO, poor correlation

Non transferrin bound iron is toxic to living systems because it can act as a catalyst in the formation of ROS which in turn stimulate lipid peroxidation in membranes. In iron-over‐ loaded states when SIBC becomes fully saturated, NTBI complexes appear in the serum. In a study by Harrison et al, serum ferritin was raised in 21 of 28 patients following treatment for hematological malignancy, whereas only 16% of them had LFT abnormalities. However, NTBI was detected in 4 of 6 patients with an unexplained elevated LFTs. Therefore, they considered that NTBI might be a more specific indicator of IO than the serum ferritin con‐ centrations [77]. Assessment of NTBI is a potentially useful approach that allows the estima‐ tion of toxic iron levels. However, the methods for determining this free fraction of body

The current paradigm of managing post–transplant IO is based on extensive experience in children with transfusion dependent anemias [4]. Post–transplant iron depletion therapy has been shown to reverse hepatic fibrosis and cardiomyopathy in patients with thalassemia [4, 78]. However, there is no published data indicating the benefit of iron removal therapy on long term morbidity and mortality in HSCT recipients, especially for diseases other than

Decisions regarding the management of IO should be individualized and based on a review of several factors including the need for ongoing PRBC transfusion therapy, time since transplantation, ability to tolerate iron depleting therapy and urgency to reduce body iron stores [Table 4]. For instance, coexisting anemia can preclude the use of phlebotomy where‐ as renal impairment might increase the risk of toxicity from iron chelating drugs. Also de‐ pletion of iron stores would be more imperative in patients with IO related liver test abnormalities or cardiac dysfunction compared to those without end organ toxicites [4].

Liver Biopsy Reference method, can assess degree of

SQUID Good correlation with liver biopsy, noninvasive

*2.5.4. Non Transferrin Bound Iron (NTBI)*

**2.6. Treatment of iron overload**

thalassemia [4].

Serum ferritin and

TS

hepatic dysfunction (GVHD)

MRI Good correlation with liver biopsy (T2 or R2

MRI), noninvasive, widely available

**Table 3.** Diagnostic Tests for Assessment of Body Iron Stores in HSCT Recipients [4]

iron and its precise prognostic significance require fine tuning [17].

Recent evidence suggests that the determination of iron status before HSCT has important prognostic implications. There is a gap between the time that patients are identified for HSCT and the time that actual transplant takes place. During this period, most patients stay transfusion dependent. After patients are exposed to conditioning regimen and stem cell in‐ fusion, serum ferritin levels are prone to a false elevation due to its role as an acute phase reactant. Thus, accurate evaluation and diagnosis of iron toxicity after HSCT remains as a challenge [53, 67] [Table 3].


**Table 3.** Diagnostic Tests for Assessment of Body Iron Stores in HSCT Recipients [4]

#### *2.5.4. Non Transferrin Bound Iron (NTBI)*

tin levels are however subject to natural fluctuation and can also be greatly affected by a range of inflammatory conditions that are particularly relevant in HSCT recipients. Al‐ though being a useful test for initial screening of IO in HSCT recipients, serum ferritin is not a reliable indicator of total body iron burden particularly in patients who have ongo‐ ing acute infections or inflammatory diseases [2, 4, 17, 20, 22, 23, 38, 75, 76]. Serial serum ferritin measurements can compensate the potential fluctuations and help to establish a general picture of IO over time. Nevertheless, at 1 year after–transplantation when in‐ flammatory stress has largely subsided, most patients have a serum ferritin of <1000 ng/ml and no clinical evidence of IO; serum ferritin in these patients decline slowly with time [23]. Unlike tissue ferritin a substantial proportion of serum ferritin is glycosylated which suggests that plasma ferritin is actively secreted from reticuloendothelial system or parencymal cells. Serum ferritin in contrast to tissue ferritin was claimed to have a low iron content even in iron loaded patients in some earlier studies. It is therefore claimed that serum ferritin does not provide a major source of hepatic iron either in nor‐ mal individuals or in patients with IO diseases [4, 20, 22, 23, 75]. On the contrary a di‐ rect correlation between serum ferritin levels and transfusion burden has been observed with a level of 1000 ng/ml after a median of 21 PRBC transfusions. Thus repeated meas‐ urement of serum ferritin levels seems to be a valid method to monitor secondary IO in patients with transfusion dependent anemias and MDS [17]. Majhail et al studied the prevalence of IO in 56 allo–HSCT recipients and demonstrated the poor predictive value of ferritin for estimating LIC. The overall prevalence of IO was 32%. Clinically signifi‐ cant IO (LIC>7 mg/g) was uncommon in patients with serum ferritin levels less than 1000 ng/ml. However, the LIC on MRI was moderately correlated with serum ferritin. As a result, they indicated ferritin to be a good screening test but a poor predictor of tissue IO and recommended estimation of LIC before initiating chelation therapy. They consid‐ ered that this lack of association between ferritin and LIC might be related to the varia‐ bility in ferritin levels because of ineffective erythropoiesis or underlying inflammation or infection [20]. Whereas in a study by Bazuave et al, serum ferritin, transferrin, TS, iron, soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) and C reactive protein levels in 230 HSCT recipi‐ ents were measured. All iron parameters were found to be significantly associated with survival. A combination of ferritin and TS was shown to have the highest prognostic power. They concluded that the predictive power of ferritin was derived from its associ‐ ation with IO rather than inflammation. Inferior survival in patients with IO was related to both TRM and relapse. As sTfR and TS were found to have superior prognostic value when compared to ferritin, they suggested to combine serum ferritin with TS for predic‐

Recent evidence suggests that the determination of iron status before HSCT has important prognostic implications. There is a gap between the time that patients are identified for HSCT and the time that actual transplant takes place. During this period, most patients stay transfusion dependent. After patients are exposed to conditioning regimen and stem cell in‐ fusion, serum ferritin levels are prone to a false elevation due to its role as an acute phase reactant. Thus, accurate evaluation and diagnosis of iron toxicity after HSCT remains as a

tion of IO [2].

challenge [53, 67] [Table 3].

318 Innovations in Stem Cell Transplantation

Non transferrin bound iron is toxic to living systems because it can act as a catalyst in the formation of ROS which in turn stimulate lipid peroxidation in membranes. In iron-over‐ loaded states when SIBC becomes fully saturated, NTBI complexes appear in the serum. In a study by Harrison et al, serum ferritin was raised in 21 of 28 patients following treatment for hematological malignancy, whereas only 16% of them had LFT abnormalities. However, NTBI was detected in 4 of 6 patients with an unexplained elevated LFTs. Therefore, they considered that NTBI might be a more specific indicator of IO than the serum ferritin con‐ centrations [77]. Assessment of NTBI is a potentially useful approach that allows the estima‐ tion of toxic iron levels. However, the methods for determining this free fraction of body iron and its precise prognostic significance require fine tuning [17].

#### **2.6. Treatment of iron overload**

The current paradigm of managing post–transplant IO is based on extensive experience in children with transfusion dependent anemias [4]. Post–transplant iron depletion therapy has been shown to reverse hepatic fibrosis and cardiomyopathy in patients with thalassemia [4, 78]. However, there is no published data indicating the benefit of iron removal therapy on long term morbidity and mortality in HSCT recipients, especially for diseases other than thalassemia [4].

Decisions regarding the management of IO should be individualized and based on a review of several factors including the need for ongoing PRBC transfusion therapy, time since transplantation, ability to tolerate iron depleting therapy and urgency to reduce body iron stores [Table 4]. For instance, coexisting anemia can preclude the use of phlebotomy where‐ as renal impairment might increase the risk of toxicity from iron chelating drugs. Also de‐ pletion of iron stores would be more imperative in patients with IO related liver test abnormalities or cardiac dysfunction compared to those without end organ toxicites [4].


overload should be treated by means of phlebotomy and/or chelation therapy especially when IO coexists with chronic viral hepatitis. Phlebotomy has the advantage over chelation of better compliance, fewer side effects and lower costs. The use of ESA may facilitate the

Iron Overload and Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/53819

321

After normalization of transaminases and serum ferritin with aggressive phlebotomy, main‐ tenance phlebotomy is required every 3-6 months to prevent iron reaccumulation and keep serum ferritin in a low normal range. The gradual rise in ferritin after successful iron deple‐ tion suggests that there is a signal for increased iron absorbtion and the signal persists well beyond the peri–transplant period. It may be that post–transplant immunosuppressants re‐ duce the level of cytokines that normally stimulate hepcidin production and allow increased absorbtion of dietary iron. In addition hepatic GVHD may result in disordered hepcidin reg‐ ulation, as it likely does in chronic viral hepatitis and might explain increased risk of IO and

Treatment with phlebotomy is not possible in patients who are transfusion dependent. Che‐ lation may be preferred for iron depletion [9]. There are limited data on the pharmacological chelation of iron during the post–transplant period including the safety, optimal dose, time

Deferoxamine, the first available iron chelator, has a proven efficacy and safety with dec‐ ades of experience and has also been studied in HSCT recipients. Recommended treat‐ ment schedule is at least 5 nights per week subcutaneous delivered via a pump for 8-12 hours [4, 9]. It is effective in lowering serum ferritin levels and LIC and prevents endo‐ crinological complications. Long term treatment is also associated with a reduction in cardiac complications and improved survival. Redness and induration at the infusion site are the most common side effects. Audiological, ophthalmological, growth and bone tox‐ icities may be minimized by avoiding overchelation. Deferoxamine treatment in the HSCT setting is complicated by the short half life and the ability to release iron to bacte‐ ria and fungi. Deferoxamine supports the growth of zygomycetes because it acts as xeno‐ sidephore delivering iron to iron uptaking molecules of the species [22, 51, 81]. The greatest challenge with DFO is patient adherence with therapy because the need for pa‐ renteral administration is cumbersome, uncomfortable, inconvenient and time consuming [51]. Cardiac morbidity and mortality continue to occur in patients treated with DFO,

Deferiprone is an oral iron chelator which was first identified in 1980s and subsequently ap‐ proved for clinical use in Canada and Europe especially when DFO is contraindicated. Deferi‐ prone is not commercially available in all countries and has not been investigated in HSCT recipients. It has a short half life of only 1, 5 hours and thus requires 3 times daily dosing. Un‐ fortunately, it does not control liver iron as effective as DFO even after years of continued treat‐ ment. In contrast, a recent study in patients with thalassemia showed better myocardial function in those receiving Deferiprone. Retrospective studies have also demonstrated re‐ duced cardiac morbidity and mortality and lower myocardial iron deposition among patients

success of this strategy in patients with low hemoglobin levels [4, 19, 22, 26, 70].

the need for maintenance phlebotomy after successful iron depletion [23].

for initiation of treatment and duration of therapy [51, 80, 81].

likely related to difficulties with adherence [4, 9, 22, 51, 81].

*2.6.2. Iron chelation*

**Table 4.** Treatment Options for Iron Overload after HSCT [4]

Iron overload may be a cause of persistent hepatic dysfunction after HSCT. Patients with LIC>15 mg/g dry weight should be treated aggresively with both phlebotomy and chelation; when LIC is 7–15 mg/g dry weight, phlebotomy is indicated; when LIC is under 7 mg/g dry weight treatment is indicated only if there is evidence of liver disease. Mobilization of iron from heavily overloaded patients improves cardiac function, normalizes serum alanine transaminase levels and results in improved liver histology [24, 79].

In patients with extreme IO, effective pre–transplant chelation therapy is suggested to im‐ prove post–transplant survival, as IO is clearly related to treatment related morbidity and mortality after HSCT [4, 24, 67, 79]. In the pre–transplant period vigorous iron chelation may be important but prospective studies are required to prove a survival benefit after HSCT. In the post–transplant period phlebotomy sometimes combined with erythropoiesis stimulat‐ ing agents (ESA) may be successfully applied in thalassemia. For those patients who can not be phlebotomized iron chelation can be considered. Prospective studies of the impact of iron chelation therapy before and after HSCT on post–transplant morbidity and mortality are mandatory [4, 24].

The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (ASBMT) 2012 guidelines rec‐ ommend annual serum ferritin measurement in patients who received PRBC transfusions pre or post–transplantation. Subsequent monitoring with serum ferritin should be consid‐ ered among patients with elevated levels, especially in the presence of abnormal LFTs, PRBC transfusions or HCV infection. Additional diagnosting testing including liver biopsy, MRI or SQUID may be indicated if therapy is intended for presumptive IO. Current pre‐ scribing guidelines recommend continuation of iron reduction till ferritin levels are below 500 ng/ml [3, 9, 51, 60, 72].

#### *2.6.1. Phlebotomy*

Phlebotomy is a feasible option for the treatment of IO following HSCT. Many studies have documented its efficacy in early and late post–transplant setting. It has been shown that sub‐ clinical left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and impaired left ventricular contractility in pa‐ tients with thalassemia may be reversed by phlebotomy initiated after HSCT [51]. Iron overload should be treated by means of phlebotomy and/or chelation therapy especially when IO coexists with chronic viral hepatitis. Phlebotomy has the advantage over chelation of better compliance, fewer side effects and lower costs. The use of ESA may facilitate the success of this strategy in patients with low hemoglobin levels [4, 19, 22, 26, 70].

After normalization of transaminases and serum ferritin with aggressive phlebotomy, main‐ tenance phlebotomy is required every 3-6 months to prevent iron reaccumulation and keep serum ferritin in a low normal range. The gradual rise in ferritin after successful iron deple‐ tion suggests that there is a signal for increased iron absorbtion and the signal persists well beyond the peri–transplant period. It may be that post–transplant immunosuppressants re‐ duce the level of cytokines that normally stimulate hepcidin production and allow increased absorbtion of dietary iron. In addition hepatic GVHD may result in disordered hepcidin reg‐ ulation, as it likely does in chronic viral hepatitis and might explain increased risk of IO and the need for maintenance phlebotomy after successful iron depletion [23].

#### *2.6.2. Iron chelation*

**Modality Advantages Disadvantages**

transaminase levels and results in improved liver histology [24, 79].

Not feasible in patients with anemia or poor venous

side effects (ototoxicity, growth retardation)

Long term toxicity profile not established, side

access

hepatic fibrosis)

effects (nephrotoxicity)

Deferoxamine Extensive experience with proven efficacy Inconvenient administration route and schedule,

Iron overload may be a cause of persistent hepatic dysfunction after HSCT. Patients with LIC>15 mg/g dry weight should be treated aggresively with both phlebotomy and chelation; when LIC is 7–15 mg/g dry weight, phlebotomy is indicated; when LIC is under 7 mg/g dry weight treatment is indicated only if there is evidence of liver disease. Mobilization of iron from heavily overloaded patients improves cardiac function, normalizes serum alanine

In patients with extreme IO, effective pre–transplant chelation therapy is suggested to im‐ prove post–transplant survival, as IO is clearly related to treatment related morbidity and mortality after HSCT [4, 24, 67, 79]. In the pre–transplant period vigorous iron chelation may be important but prospective studies are required to prove a survival benefit after HSCT. In the post–transplant period phlebotomy sometimes combined with erythropoiesis stimulat‐ ing agents (ESA) may be successfully applied in thalassemia. For those patients who can not be phlebotomized iron chelation can be considered. Prospective studies of the impact of iron chelation therapy before and after HSCT on post–transplant morbidity and mortality are

The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (ASBMT) 2012 guidelines rec‐ ommend annual serum ferritin measurement in patients who received PRBC transfusions pre or post–transplantation. Subsequent monitoring with serum ferritin should be consid‐ ered among patients with elevated levels, especially in the presence of abnormal LFTs, PRBC transfusions or HCV infection. Additional diagnosting testing including liver biopsy, MRI or SQUID may be indicated if therapy is intended for presumptive IO. Current pre‐ scribing guidelines recommend continuation of iron reduction till ferritin levels are below

Phlebotomy is a feasible option for the treatment of IO following HSCT. Many studies have documented its efficacy in early and late post–transplant setting. It has been shown that sub‐ clinical left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and impaired left ventricular contractility in pa‐ tients with thalassemia may be reversed by phlebotomy initiated after HSCT [51]. Iron

Deferiprone Oral iron chelator Unproven efficacy, side effects (neutropenia,

Phlebotomy Extensive experience with proven efficacy, no significant side effects

320 Innovations in Stem Cell Transplantation

Deferasirox Oral iron chelator, efficacy similar to deferoxamine

**Table 4.** Treatment Options for Iron Overload after HSCT [4]

mandatory [4, 24].

500 ng/ml [3, 9, 51, 60, 72].

*2.6.1. Phlebotomy*

Treatment with phlebotomy is not possible in patients who are transfusion dependent. Che‐ lation may be preferred for iron depletion [9]. There are limited data on the pharmacological chelation of iron during the post–transplant period including the safety, optimal dose, time for initiation of treatment and duration of therapy [51, 80, 81].

Deferoxamine, the first available iron chelator, has a proven efficacy and safety with dec‐ ades of experience and has also been studied in HSCT recipients. Recommended treat‐ ment schedule is at least 5 nights per week subcutaneous delivered via a pump for 8-12 hours [4, 9]. It is effective in lowering serum ferritin levels and LIC and prevents endo‐ crinological complications. Long term treatment is also associated with a reduction in cardiac complications and improved survival. Redness and induration at the infusion site are the most common side effects. Audiological, ophthalmological, growth and bone tox‐ icities may be minimized by avoiding overchelation. Deferoxamine treatment in the HSCT setting is complicated by the short half life and the ability to release iron to bacte‐ ria and fungi. Deferoxamine supports the growth of zygomycetes because it acts as xeno‐ sidephore delivering iron to iron uptaking molecules of the species [22, 51, 81]. The greatest challenge with DFO is patient adherence with therapy because the need for pa‐ renteral administration is cumbersome, uncomfortable, inconvenient and time consuming [51]. Cardiac morbidity and mortality continue to occur in patients treated with DFO, likely related to difficulties with adherence [4, 9, 22, 51, 81].

Deferiprone is an oral iron chelator which was first identified in 1980s and subsequently ap‐ proved for clinical use in Canada and Europe especially when DFO is contraindicated. Deferi‐ prone is not commercially available in all countries and has not been investigated in HSCT recipients. It has a short half life of only 1, 5 hours and thus requires 3 times daily dosing. Un‐ fortunately, it does not control liver iron as effective as DFO even after years of continued treat‐ ment. In contrast, a recent study in patients with thalassemia showed better myocardial function in those receiving Deferiprone. Retrospective studies have also demonstrated re‐ duced cardiac morbidity and mortality and lower myocardial iron deposition among patients treated with Deferiprone compared with DFO and Deferasirox (DFX). A reduction or stabiliza‐ tion of serum ferritin levels and LIC in most patients with transfusional IO was demonstrated. The high risk of agranulocytosis necessitates weekly blood monitoring. Thus, toxicity profile of the drug may be inappropriate for transplant recipients [4, 9, 81].

**References**

J Hematol 2011;93(3):368-374.

2004;34(7):561-571.

tion. p177-194.

p249-269.

Blood 1999;93(10):3259-3266.

Blood Rev 2009;23(3):95-104.

tion. Bone Marrow Transplant 2008;41(12):997-1003.

[1] Tachibana T, Tanaka M, Takasaki H, Numata A, Ito S, Watanabe R, Hyo R, Ohshima R, Hagihara M, Sakai R, Fujisawa S, Tomita N, Fujita H, Maruta A, Ishigatsubo Y, Kanamori H. Pretransplant serum ferritin is associated with bloodstream infections within 100 days of allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myeloid malignancies. Int

Iron Overload and Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/53819

323

[2] Bazuaye GN, Buser A, Gerull S, Tichelli A, Stern M. Prognostic impact of iron param‐ eters in patients undergoing allo-SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant 2012; 47(1):60-64. [3] Majhail NS, Rizzo JD, Lee SJ, Aljurf M, Atsuta Y, Bonfim C, Burns LJ, Chaudhri N, Davies S, Okamoto S, Seber A, Socie G, Szer J, Van Lint MT, Wingard JR, Tichelli A; Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR); Ameri‐ can Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (ASBMT); European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT); Asia-Pacific Blood and Marrow Trans‐ plantation Group (APBMT); Bone Marrow Transplant Society of Australia and New Zealand (BMTSANZ); East Mediterranean Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group (EMBMT); Sociedade Brasileira de Transplante de Medula Ossea (SBTMO). Recommended screening and preventive practices for long-term survivors after hem‐ atopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2012;18(3):348-371. [4] Majhail NS, Lazarus HM, Burns LJ. Iron overload in hematopoietic cell transplanta‐

[5] Evens AM, Mehta J, Gordon LI. Rust and corrosion in hematopoietic stem cell trans‐ plantation: the problem of iron and oxidative stress. Bone Marrow Transplant

[6] Carreras E. Early complications after HSCT. In: Apperley J, Carreras E, Gluckman E, Masszi T. Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Chapter 11; 2012 Revised Edi‐

[7] Tichelli A, Socie G on behalf of the Late Effects Working Party of the EBMT. Late ef‐ fects in patients treated with HSCT. In: Apperley J, Carreras E, Gluckman E, Masszi T. Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Chapter 15; 2012 Revised Edition.

[8] Strasser SI, Sullivan KM, Myerson D, Spurgeon CL, Storer B, Schoch HG, Murakami CS, McDonald GB. Cirrhosis of the liver in long-term marrow transplant survivors.

[9] Knovich MA, Storey JA, Coffman LG, Torti SV, Torti FM. Ferritin for the clinician.

[10] Sucak GT, Yegin ZA, Ozkurt ZN, Aki SZ, Karakan T, Akyol G. The role of liver biop‐ sy in the workup of liver dysfunction late after SCT: is the role of iron overload un‐

derestimated? Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008;42(7):461-467.

A novel oral iron chelator, DFX was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2005 and represents a significant advancement in the treatment of IO. It is a tridentate oral iron chelator which is lipid soluble but highly protein bound. It has a plasma half life about 12 hours and thus is ideal for once daily dosing. It binds iron in a 2/1 ratio. It is excreted by the hepatobili‐ ary system and the chelated iron is excreted via the feces. The effective dose is between 20-40 mg/kg. It is generally well tolerated by patients although some dose modifications may be nec‐ essary for diarrhea. Phase III trials demonstrated that DFX at 20-30 mg/kg/day led to the main‐ tenance or reduction of iron burden as measured by LIC in chronically transfused patients. Reductions in LIC and serum ferritin are similar to those found in the subcutaneous use of DFO. Commonly reported side effects include skin rash, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea and el‐ evations in serum creatinine levels, which may be important in patients treated with calcineur‐ in inhibitors. Gastrointestinal disturbances often improve with continued administration of the drug. Elevations in serum creatinine occur in approximately 1/3 of subjects. Side effects as‐ sociated with DFX therapy may overlap or exacerbate early complications such as calcineurin induced renal injury seen after allo–HSCT, which Mkes it complicated to use early after HSCT. The availability of an oral iron chelator has simplified the treatment of IO, but more experience with its use in HSCT recipients is needed [4, 9, 22, 80, 81].

## **3. Conclusion**

The role of IO in HSCT recipients and guidelines for screening strategies warrants further stud‐ ies. The value of routine screening for IO, the method of determining it, whether it should be with serum ferritin, by determining LIC with non invasive MRI or biopsy and identifying a sub‐ group of patients who might benefit from phlebotomy and/or iron chelating agents requires fu‐ ture prospective studies. The possibility of IO should be considered in patients who are candidates for HSCT. Red blood cell transfusion should be limited whenever possible and chela‐ tion and/or phlebothomy should be considered in the course of documented IO. pre–transplant preventive measures should also be adopted to avoid IO and improve survival in these patients.

## **Author details**

Zeynep Arzu Yegin1 , Gülsan Türköz Sucak1 and Taner Demirer1

\*Address all correspondence to: Taner.Demirer@medicine.ankara.edu.tr

1 Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Hematology, Ankara, Turkey

Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Hematology, Ankara, Turkey

## **References**

treated with Deferiprone compared with DFO and Deferasirox (DFX). A reduction or stabiliza‐ tion of serum ferritin levels and LIC in most patients with transfusional IO was demonstrated. The high risk of agranulocytosis necessitates weekly blood monitoring. Thus, toxicity profile of

A novel oral iron chelator, DFX was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2005 and represents a significant advancement in the treatment of IO. It is a tridentate oral iron chelator which is lipid soluble but highly protein bound. It has a plasma half life about 12 hours and thus is ideal for once daily dosing. It binds iron in a 2/1 ratio. It is excreted by the hepatobili‐ ary system and the chelated iron is excreted via the feces. The effective dose is between 20-40 mg/kg. It is generally well tolerated by patients although some dose modifications may be nec‐ essary for diarrhea. Phase III trials demonstrated that DFX at 20-30 mg/kg/day led to the main‐ tenance or reduction of iron burden as measured by LIC in chronically transfused patients. Reductions in LIC and serum ferritin are similar to those found in the subcutaneous use of DFO. Commonly reported side effects include skin rash, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea and el‐ evations in serum creatinine levels, which may be important in patients treated with calcineur‐ in inhibitors. Gastrointestinal disturbances often improve with continued administration of the drug. Elevations in serum creatinine occur in approximately 1/3 of subjects. Side effects as‐ sociated with DFX therapy may overlap or exacerbate early complications such as calcineurin induced renal injury seen after allo–HSCT, which Mkes it complicated to use early after HSCT. The availability of an oral iron chelator has simplified the treatment of IO, but more experience

The role of IO in HSCT recipients and guidelines for screening strategies warrants further stud‐ ies. The value of routine screening for IO, the method of determining it, whether it should be with serum ferritin, by determining LIC with non invasive MRI or biopsy and identifying a sub‐ group of patients who might benefit from phlebotomy and/or iron chelating agents requires fu‐ ture prospective studies. The possibility of IO should be considered in patients who are candidates for HSCT. Red blood cell transfusion should be limited whenever possible and chela‐ tion and/or phlebothomy should be considered in the course of documented IO. pre–transplant preventive measures should also be adopted to avoid IO and improve survival in these patients.

and Taner Demirer1

the drug may be inappropriate for transplant recipients [4, 9, 81].

with its use in HSCT recipients is needed [4, 9, 22, 80, 81].

, Gülsan Türköz Sucak1

\*Address all correspondence to: Taner.Demirer@medicine.ankara.edu.tr

1 Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Hematology, Ankara, Turkey

Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Hematology, Ankara, Turkey

**3. Conclusion**

322 Innovations in Stem Cell Transplantation

**Author details**

Zeynep Arzu Yegin1


[11] Emerit J, Beaumont C, Trivin F. Iron metabolism, free radicals, and oxidative injury. Biomed Pharmacother 2001;55(6):333-339.

[25] Koreth J, Antin JH. Iron overload in hematologic malignancies and outcome of allo‐ geneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Haematologica 2010;95(3):364-366. [26] Strasser SI, Kowdley KV, Sale GE, McDonald GB. Iron overload in bone marrow

Iron Overload and Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/53819

325

[27] Altes A, Remacha AF, Sarda P, Baiget M, Sureda A, Martino R, Briones J, Brunet S, Canals C, Sierra J. Early clinical impact of iron overload in stem cell transplantation.

[28] Sahlstedt L, Ebeling F, von Bonsdorff L, Parkkinen J, Ruutu T. Non-transferrinbound iron during allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Br J Haematol 2001;113(3):

[29] Yegin ZA, Paşaoğlu H, Aki SZ, Özkurt ZN, Demirtaş C, Yağci M, Acar K, Sucak GT. Pro-oxidative/antioxidative imbalance: a key indicator of adverse outcome in hema‐

[30] Dürken M, Nielsen P, Knobel S, Finckh B, Herrnring C, Dresow B, Kohlschütter B, Stockschläder M, Krüger WH, Kohlschütter A, Zander AR. Nontransferrin-bound iron in serum of patients receiving bone marrow transplants. Free Radic Biol Med

[31] Dürken M, Herrnring C, Finckh B, Nagel S, Nielsen P, Fischer R, Berger HM, Moison RM, Pichlmeier U, Kohlschütter B, Zander AR, Kohlschütter A. Impaired plasma an‐ tioxidative defense and increased nontransferrin-bound iron during high-dose che‐ motherapy and radiochemotherapy preceding bone marrow transplantation. Free

[32] Altès A, Remacha AF, Sureda A, Martino R, Briones J, Canals C, Brunet S, Sierra J, Gimferrer E. Iron overload might increase transplant-related mortality in haemato‐ poietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2002;29(12):987-989. [33] Altes A, Remacha AF, Sarda P, Sancho FJ, Sureda A, Martino R, Briones J, Brunet S, Canals C, Sierra J. Frequent severe liver iron overload after stem cell transplantation and its possible association with invasive aspergillosis. Bone Marrow Transplant

[34] Kontoyiannis DP, Chamilos G, Lewis RE, Giralt S, Cortes J, Raad II, Manning JT, Han X. Increased bone marrow iron stores is an independent risk factor for invasive as‐ pergillosis in patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies and recipients of allo‐

geneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Cancer 2007;110(6):1303-1306. [35] Maertens J, Demuynck H, Verbeken EK, Zachée P, Verhoef GE, Vandenberghe P, Boogaerts MA. Mucormycosis in allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients: re‐ port of five cases and review of the role of iron overload in the pathogenesis. Bone

[36] Mahindra A, Bolwell B, Sobecks R, Rybicki L, Pohlman B, Dean R, Andresen S, Sweetenham J, Kalaycio M, Copelan E. Elevated ferritin is associated with relapse af‐

topoietic stem cell transplantation. Int J Lab Hematol 2011;33(4):414-423.

transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998;22(2):167-173.

A prospective study. Ann Hematol 2007;86(6):443-447.

836-838.

1997;22(7):1159-1163.

2004;34(6):505-509.

Radic Biol Med 2000;28(6):887-894.

Marrow Transplant 1999;24(3):307-312.


[25] Koreth J, Antin JH. Iron overload in hematologic malignancies and outcome of allo‐ geneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Haematologica 2010;95(3):364-366.

[11] Emerit J, Beaumont C, Trivin F. Iron metabolism, free radicals, and oxidative injury.

[12] Lee DH, Jacobs DR Jr. Serum markers of stored body iron are not appropriate mark‐ ers of health effects of iron: a focus on serum ferritin. Med Hypotheses 2004;62(3):

[13] Gordon LI, Brown SG, Tallman MS, Rademaker AW, Weitzman SA, Lazarus HM, Kelley CH, Mangan C, Rubin H, Fox RM, et al. Sequential changes in serum iron and ferritin in patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and radiation with autolo‐ gous bone marrow transplantation: possible implications for treatment related toxici‐

[14] Deugnier Y, Brissot P, Loréal O. Iron and the liver: update 2008. J Hepatol 2008;48

[15] Deeg HJ, Spaulding E, Shulman HM. Iron overload, hematopoietic cell transplanta‐ tion, and graft-versus-host disease. Leuk Lymphoma 2009;50(10):1566-1572.

[16] Ma AD, Gordeuk VR. Iron metabolism, iron overload and the porphyrias. In: Ameri‐ can Society of Hematology Self Assessment Program. Chapter 4; 2010. p93-108.

[17] Malcovati L. Impact of transfusion dependency and secondary iron overload on the survival of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Leuk Res 2007;31 Suppl 3:S2-6.

[18] Kamble RT, Selby GB, Mims M, Kharfan-Dabaja MA, Ozer H, George JN. Iron over‐ load manifesting as apparent exacerbation of hepatic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant

[19] Socié G, Salooja N, Cohen A, Rovelli A, Carreras E, Locasciulli A, Korthof E, Weis J, Levy V, Tichelli A; Late Effects Working Party of the European Study Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Nonmalignant late effects after allogeneic stem

[20] Majhail NS, DeFor T, Lazarus HM, Burns LJ. High prevalence of iron overload in adult allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant survivors. Biol Blood Marrow Trans‐

[21] Majhail NS, DeFor TE, Lazarus HM, Burns LJ. Iron-overload after autologous hema‐

[22] Pullarkat V. Iron overload in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplan‐

[23] Kamble R, Mims M. Iron-overload in long-term survivors of hematopoietic trans‐

[24] De Witte T. The role of iron in patients after bone marrow transplantation. Blood Rev

Biomed Pharmacother 2001;55(6):333-339.

ty. Free Radic Biol Med 1995;18(3):383-389.

cell transplantation. Blood 2003;101(9):3373-3385.

tation. Adv Hematol 2010;2010. pii: 345756.

topoietic cell transplantation. Leuk Res 2009;33(4):578-579.

plantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2006;37(8):805-806.

442-445.

324 Innovations in Stem Cell Transplantation

Suppl 1:S113-123.

2006;12(5):506-510.

plant 2008;14(7):790-794.

2008;22 Suppl 2:S22-28.


ter autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for lymphoma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2008;14(11):1239-1244.

[47] Gaziev J, Sodani P, Polchi P, Andreani M, Lucarelli G. Bone marrow transplantation in adults with thalassemia: Treatment and long-term follow-up. Ann N Y Acad Sci

Iron Overload and Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/53819

327

[48] Morado M, Ojeda E, Garcia-Bustos J, Aguado MJ, Arrieta R, Quevedo E, Navas A, Hernandez-Navarro F. Serum Ferritin as Risk Factor for Veno-occlusive Disease of

[49] Sucak GT, Yegin ZA, Ozkurt ZN, Aki SZ, Yağci M. Iron overload: predictor of ad‐ verse outcome in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Transplant Proc 2010;42(5):

[50] Sucak GT, Aki ZS, Yagcí M, Yegin ZA, Ozkurt ZN, Haznedar R. Treatment of sinus‐ oidal obstruction syndrome with defibrotide: a single-center experience. Transplant

[51] Unal S, Kuskonmaz B, Hazirolan T, Eldem G, Aytac S, Cetin M, Uckan D, Gumruk F. Deferasirox use after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in pediatric patients with beta-thalassemia major: preliminary results. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2010;27(6):

[52] Marx JJ. Iron and infection: competition between host and microbes for a precious el‐

[53] Ali S, Pimentel JD, Munoz J, Shah V, McKinnon R, Divine G, Janakiraman N. Iron overload in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Arch Pathol Lab

[54] Miceli MH, Dong L, Grazziutti ML, Fassas A, Thertulien R, Van Rhee F, Barlogie B, Anaissie EJ. Iron overload is a major risk factor for severe infection after autologous stem cell transplantation: a study of 367 myeloma patients. Bone Marrow Transplant

[55] Tunçcan OG, Yegin ZA, Ozkurt ZN, Erbaş G, Aki SZ, Senol E, Yağci M, Sucak G. High ferritin levels are associated with hepatosplenic candidiasis in hematopoietic

[56] Özyilmaz E, Aydogdu M, Sucak G, Aki SZ, Ozkurt ZN, Yegin ZA, Kokturk N. Risk factors for fungal pulmonary infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation re‐ cipients: the role of iron overload. Bone Marrow Transplant 2010;45(10):1528-1533.

[57] Platzbecker U, Bornhäuser M, Germing U, Stumpf J, Scott BL, Kröger N, Schwerdt‐ feger R, Böhm A, Kobbe G, Theuser C, Rabitsch W, Valent P, Sorror ML, Ehninger G, Deeg HJ. Red blood cell transfusion dependence and outcome after allogeneic pe‐ ripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with de novo myelodysplastic

[58] Mahindra A, Bolwell B, Sobecks R, Rybicki L, Pohlman B, Dean R, Andresen S, Sweetenham J, Kalaycio M, Copelan E. Elevated pretransplant ferritin is associated

stem cell transplant candidates. Int J Infect Dis 2010;14 Suppl 3:e104-107.

syndrome (MDS). Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2008;14(11):1217-1225.

ement. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2002;15(2):411-426.

the Liver. Prospective Cohort Study. Hematology 2000;4(6):505-512.

2005;1054:196-205.

1841-1848.

482-489.

Proc 2007;39(5):1558-1563.

Med 2012;136(5):532-538.

2006;37(9):857-864.


[47] Gaziev J, Sodani P, Polchi P, Andreani M, Lucarelli G. Bone marrow transplantation in adults with thalassemia: Treatment and long-term follow-up. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2005;1054:196-205.

ter autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for lymphoma. Biol Blood

[37] Mahindra A, Sobecks R, Rybicki L, Pohlman B, Dean R, Andresen S, Kalaycio M, Sweetenham J, Bolwell B, Copelan E. Elevated pretransplant serum ferritin is associ‐ ated with inferior survival following nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplantation.

[38] Pullarkat V, Blanchard S, Tegtmeier B, Dagis A, Patane K, Ito J, Forman SJ. Iron over‐ load adversely affects outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Bone

[39] Maradei SC, Maiolino A, de Azevedo AM, Colares M, Bouzas LF, Nucci M. Serum ferritin as risk factor for sinusoidal obstruction syndrome of the liver in patients un‐ dergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood 2009;114(6):1270-1275.

[40] Armand P, Kim HT, Cutler CS, Ho VT, Koreth J, Ritz J, Alyea EP, Antin JH, Soiffer RJ. A prognostic score for patients with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syn‐ dromes undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood marrow Trans‐

[41] Tomás JF, Pinilla I, García-Buey ML, García A, Figuera A, Gómez-García de Soria VGG, Moreno R, Fernández-Rañada JM. Long-term liver dysfunction after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: clinical features and course in 61 patients. Bone Mar‐

[42] Ho GT, Parker A, MacKenzie JF, Morris AJ, Stanley AJ. Abnormal liver function tests following bone marrow transplantation: aetiology and role of liver biopsy. Eur J Gas‐

[43] Choi SW, Islam S, Greenson JK, Levine J, Hutchinson R, Yanik G, Teitelbaum DH, Ferrara JL, Cooke KR. The use of laparoscopic liver biopsies in pediatric patients with hepatic dysfunction following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplanta‐

[44] Strasser SI. When should liver biopsy be performed after hematopoietic stem cell

[45] Iqbal M, Creger RJ, Fox RM, Cooper BW, Jacobs G, Stellato TA, Lazarus HM. Laparo‐ scopic liver biopsy to evaluate hepatic dysfunction in patients with hematologic ma‐ lignancies: a useful tool to effect changes in management. Bone Marrow Transplant

[46] Fujita N, Sugimoto R, Urawa N, Araki J, Mifuji R, Yamamoto M, Horiike S, Tanaka H, Iwasa M, Kobayashi Y, Adachi Y, Kaito M. Hepatic iron accumulation is associat‐ ed with disease progression and resistance to interferon/ribavirin combination thera‐

py in chronic hepatitis C. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;22(11):1886-1893.

Marrow Transplant 2008;14(11):1239-1244.

326 Innovations in Stem Cell Transplantation

Bone Marrow Transplant 2009;44(11):767-768.

Marrow Transplant 2008;42(12):799-805.

plant 2008;14(1);28-35.

1996;17(4):655-662.

row Transplant 2000;26(6):649-655.

troenterol Hepatol 2004;16(2):157-162.

tion. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005;36(10):891-896.

transplantation? J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;23(2):167-169.


with a lower incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease and inferior survival after myeloablative allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Br J Haematol 2009;146(3):310-316.

[69] Carreras E. Risk assessment in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: the liver as a

Iron Overload and Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/53819

329

[70] Liatsos C, Mehta AB, Potter M, Burroughs AK. The hepatologist in the haematolo‐

[71] Wood JC. Impact of iron assessment by MRI. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ

[72] Gandon Y, Olivié D, Guyader D, Aubé C, Oberti F, Sebille V, Deugnier Y. Non-inva‐ sive assessment of hepatic iron stores by MRI. Lancet 2004;363(9406):357-362.

[73] Voskaridou E, Douskou M, Terpos E, Papassotiriou I, Stamoulakatou A, Ourailidis A, Loutradi A, Loukopoulos D. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of iron overload in patients with beta thalassaemia and sickle cell disease. Br J Haematol

[74] St Pierre TG, Clark PR, Chua-anusorn W, Fleming AJ, Jeffrey GP, Olynyk JK, Pootra‐ kul P, Robins E, Lindeman R. Noninvasive measurement and imaging of liver iron

[75] Nielsen P, Günther U, Dürken M, Fischer R, Düllmann J. Serum ferritin iron in iron overload and liver damage: correlation to body iron stores and diagnostic relevance.

[76] Butt NM, Clark RE. Autografting as a risk factor for persisting iron overload in longterm survivors of acute myeloid leukaemia. Bone Marrow Transplant 2003;32(9):

[77] Harrison P, Neilson JR, Marwah SS, Madden L, Bareford D, Milligan DW. Role of non-transferrin bound iron in iron overload and liver dysfunction in long term survi‐ vors of acute leukaemia and bone marrow transplantation. J Clin Pathol 1996;49(10):

[78] Muretto P, Angelucci E, Lucarelli G. Reversibility of cirrhosis in patients cured of thalassemia by bone marrow transplantation. Annals of Internal Medicine

[79] McDonald GB. Review article: management of hepatic disease following haemato‐

[80] Yeşilipek MA, Karasu G, Kazik M, Uygun V, Ozturk Z. Posttransplant oral iron-che‐ lating therapy in patients with beta-thalassemia major. Pediatr Hematol Oncol

[81] Kwiatkowski JL. Real-world use of iron chelators. Hematology Am Soc Hematol

poietic cell transplant. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;24(3):441-452.

concentrations using proton magnetic resonance. Blood 2005;105(2):855-861.

risk factor. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2007;20(2):231-246.

gists' camp. Br J Haematol 2001;113(3):567-578.

Program 2011;2011:443-450.

2004;126(5):736-742.

909-913.

853-856.

2002;136(9):667-672.

2010;27(5):374-379.

Educ Program 2011;2011:451-458.

J Lab Clin Med 2000;135(5):413-418.


[69] Carreras E. Risk assessment in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: the liver as a risk factor. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2007;20(2):231-246.

with a lower incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease and inferior survival after myeloablative allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Br J Haematol

[59] Kataoka K, Nannya Y, Hangaishi A, Imai Y, Chiba S, Takahashi T, Kurokawa M. In‐ fluence of pretransplantation serum ferritin on nonrelapse mortality after myeloabla‐ tive and nonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol

[60] Alessandrino EP, Della Porta MG, Bacigalupo A, Malcovati L, Angelucci E, Van Lint MT, Falda M, Onida F, Bernardi M, Guidi S, Lucarelli B, Rambaldi A, Cerretti R, Marenco P, Pioltelli P, Pascutto C, Oneto R, Pirolini L, Fanin R, Bosi A. Prognostic impact of pre-transplantation transfusion history and secondary iron overload in pa‐ tients with myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplanta‐

[61] Andrews NC. Forging a field: the golden age of iron biology. Blood 2008;112:219-230. [62] Tanaka M, Tachibana T, Numata A, Takasaki H, Matsumoto K, Maruta A, Ishigatsu‐ bo Y, Kanamori H. A prognostic score with pretransplant serum ferritin and disease status predicts outcome following reduced-intensity SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant

[63] Tachibana T, Tanaka M, Takasaki H, Numata A, Maruta A, Ishigatsubo Y, Kanamori H. Pre-SCT serum ferritin is a prognostic factor in adult AML, but not ALL. Bone

[64] Lim ZY, Fiaccadori V, Gandhi S, Hayden J, Kenyon M, Ireland R, Marsh J, Ho AY, Mufti GJ, Pagliuca A. Impact of pre-transplant serum ferritin on outcomes of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia receiving reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

[65] Armand P, Kim HT, Cutler CS, Ho VT, Koreth J, Ritz J, Alyea EP, Antin JH, Soiffer RJ. A prognostic score for patients with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syn‐ dromes undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Trans‐

[66] Armand P, Kim HT, Cutler CS, Ho VT, Koreth J, Alyea EP, Soiffer RJ, Antin JH. Prog‐ nostic impact of elevated pretransplantation serum ferritin in patients undergoing

[67] Storey JA, Connor RF, Lewis ZT, Hurd D, Pomper G, Keung YK, Grover M, Lovato J, Torti SV, Torti FM, Molnár I. The transplant iron score as a predictor of stem cell

[68] Armand P, Sainvil MM, Kim HT, Rhodes J, Cutler C, Ho VT, Koreth J, Alyea EP, Neufeld EJ, Kwong RY, Soiffer RJ, Antin JH. Does iron overload really matter in stem

myeloablative stem cell transplantation. Blood 2007;109(10):4586-4588.

transplant survival. J Hematol Oncol 2009; 2:44.

cell transplantation? Am J Hematol 2012;87(6):569-572.

2009;146(3):310-316.

328 Innovations in Stem Cell Transplantation

2012;47(4):596-597.

Blood Marrow Transplant 2009;15(2):195-204.

Marrow Transplant 2011;46(9):1268-1269.

Leuk Res 2010;34(6):723-727.

plant 2008;14(1):28-35.

tion: a GITMO study. Haematologica 2010;95(3):476-484.


**Chapter 15**

**Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) and Stem Cell Therapy (SCT):**

Sickle Cell Disorder (SCD) is an inherited disease of red blood cells which has no widely available cure (Bernaudin, Socie, Kuentz, et al., 2007). While current medical therapies can make a significant difference in short-term effects (i.e. to relieve pain symptoms, prevent in‐ fections and manage complications such as eye damage, and strokes; and control complica‐ tions), the progressive deterioration in organ function results in increased mortality and decreased quality of life among affect persons in Nigeria. Presently, blood and bone marrow stem cell transplant appear to be the only viable option for its eliminating. This option is hugely expensive and unaffordable for the vast majority of the affected Nigerian families since most of them could barely provide for the general routine medication therapies of the patient. Little attention is being given to the management of this disorder in Nigeria as com‐ pared to diseases such as malaria and polio myelitis. Institutional research attention and in‐ ternational funding support towards the search for ways to predict the severity of and for

Globally, sickle cell disorders (SCD) affect millions of people of all races throughout the world. About 80% of affected children are born in developing countries and about 50 – 80% of children with SCD die each year in low – middle income countries. Nonetheless, its mag‐ nitude in Nigeria and Africa on the whole is alarming. Nigeria has the largest burden of SCD in Africa *(see table 1 for a presentation of the progress report*). At least 40 million Nigerians are carriers (AS) versus 2 million Americans. Over 150,000 Nigerians are born each year with sickle cell anaemia (SS) versus 2,000 in America (Akinyanju, 2009). Numerous families

> © 2013 Ilesanmi; licensee InTech. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use,

© 2013 The Author(s). Licensee InTech. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution,

distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

**Implications for Psychotherapy and Genetic**

**Counselling in Africa**

Oluwatoyin Olatundun Ilesanmi

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/53082

**1. Introduction**

Additional information is available at the end of the chapter

curative therapies of this disorder are also limited in Africa.
