**Author details**

Frank Xue Jiang

Address all correspondence to: Frank.Jiang@unilever.com

Unilever Research & Development, Shanghai, P.R. China

Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Unilever, its management or employees. The authors have no financial interest in this publication and receive nothing in exchange for providing this review.

#### **References**


[6] Page H, Flood P, Reynaud EG. Three-dimensional tissue cultures: current trends and beyond. Cell Tissue Res 2012;(Epub).

engineering applications. Some of the potential directions include creating dynamic adhe‐ sive gradient to guide cell migration or neurite outgrowth at desired time point, con‐ structing scaffolds with suitable mechanical rigidity to inhibit glia cell growth (thus hinder scar formation) while promoting nerve regeneration with compliance gradient, and developing dynamic platform for stem cell harvesting and differentiation for cell-

The helpful discussions and advice from Langrana group at Rutgers University, New Jersey,

Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Unilever, its management or employees. The authors have no financial interest in this publication and receive nothing

[1] Keatch RP, Schor AM, Vorstius JB, Schor SL. Biomaterials in regenerative medicine: engineering to recapitulate the natural. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2012;23:579-582.

[2] Brizzi MF, Tarone G, Defilippi P. Extracellular matrix, integrins, and growth factors

[3] Cukierman E, Pankov R, Stevens DR, Yamada KM. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to

[5] Discher DE, Mooney DJ, Zandstra PW. Growth factors, matrices, and forces combine

as tailors of the stem cell niche. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2012;(Epub).

[4] Geiger B. Cell biology. Encounters in space. Science 2001;294:1661-1663.

the third dimension. Science 2001;294:1708-1712.

and control stem cells. Science 2009;324:1673-1677.

USA as well as previous collaborators are greatly appreciated.

Address all correspondence to: Frank.Jiang@unilever.com

Unilever Research & Development, Shanghai, P.R. China

in exchange for providing this review.

based therapies.

**Acknowledgments**

100 Advances in Biomaterials Science and Biomedical Applications

**Author details**

Frank Xue Jiang

**References**


[39] Hui EE, Bhatia SN. Micromechanical control of cell-cell interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:5722-5726.

[23] Haq F, Keith C, Zhang G. Neurite development in PC12 cells on flexible micro-tex‐

[24] Nicodemus GD, Bryant SJ. Mechanical loading regimes affect the anabolic and catab‐ olic activities by chondrocytes encapsulated in PEG hydrogels. Osteoarthritis Carti‐

[25] Brown L. Cardiac extracellular matrix: a dynamic entity. Am J Physiol Heart Circ

[26] Jung Y, Kim SH, Kim YH. The effects of dynamic and three-dimensional environ‐ ments on chondrogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells. Biomed Mater

[27] Tschumperlin DJ, Boudreault F, Liu F. Recent advances and new opportunities in

[29] Dallas SL, Chen Q, Sivakumar P. Dynamics of assembly and reorganization of extrac‐

[30] Daley WP, Peters SB, Larsen M. Extracellular matrix dynamics in development and

[31] Shi YB, Fu L, Hsia SC, Tomita A, Buchholz D. Thyroid hormone regulation of apop‐ totic tissue remodeling during anuran metamorphosis. Cell Res 2001;11:245-252.

[32] Sivakumar P, Czirok A, Rongish BJ, Divakara VP, Wang YP, Dallas SL. New insights into extracellular matrix assembly and reorganization from dynamic imaging of ex‐

[33] An SS, Kim J, Ahn K, Trepat X, Drake KJ, Kumar S, et al. Cell stiffness, contractile stress and the role of extracellular matrix. Biochem Biophys Res Commun

[34] Reilly GC, Engler AJ. Intrinsic extracellular matrix properties regulate stem cell dif‐

[35] Chen ZL, Indyk JA, Strickland S. The hippocampal laminin matrix is dynamic and

[36] Coles JM, Zhang L, Blum JJ, Warman ML, Jay GD, Guilak F, et al. Loss of cartilage structure, stiffness, and frictional properties in mice lacking Prg4. Arthritis Rheum

[37] Kutty JK, Webb K. Tissue engineering therapies for the vocal fold lamina propria.

[38] Siu MK, Cheng CY. Dynamic cross-talk between cells and the extracellular matrix in

critical for neuronal survival. Mol Biol Cell 2003;14:2665-2676.

tracellular matrix proteins in living osteoblasts. J Cell Sci 2006;119:1350-1360.

[28] Gorstein F. The dynamic extracellular matrix. Hum Pathol 1988;19:751-752.

tured substrates under cyclic stretch. Biotechnol Prog 2006;22:133-140.

lage 2010;18:126-137.

2009;4:055009.

2009;382:697-703.

2010;62:1666-1674.

ferentiation. J Biomech 2010;43:55-62.

Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2009;15:249-262.

the testis. Bioessays 2004;26:978-992.

Physiol 2005;289:H973-974.

102 Advances in Biomaterials Science and Biomedical Applications

lung mechanobiology. J Biomech 2010;43:99-107.

ellular matrix proteins. Curr Top Dev Biol 2006;75:1-24.

regenerative medicine. J Cell Sci 2008;121:255-264.


[67] Yeo WS, Mrksich M. Electroactive self-assembled monolayers that permit orthogonal control over the adhesion of cells to patterned substrates. Langmuir 2006;22:10816-10820.

[53] Bellows CG, Melcher AH, Aubin JE. Contraction and organization of collagen gels by cells cultured from periodontal ligament, gingiva and bone suggest functional differ‐

[54] Lee B, Han L, Frank EH, Chubinskaya S, Ortiz C, Grodzinsky AJ. Dynamic mechani‐ cal properties of the tissue-engineered matrix associated with individual chondro‐

[55] Appelman TP, Mizrahi J, Elisseeff JH, Seliktar D. The differential effect of scaffold composition and architecture on chondrocyte response to mechanical stimulation. Bi‐

[56] Crapo PM, Wang Y. Physiologic compliance in engineered small-diameter arterial constructs based on an elastomeric substrate. Biomaterials 2010;31:1626-1635.

[57] Li L, Sharma N, Chippada U, Jiang X, Schloss R, Yarmush ML, et al. Functional mod‐ ulation of ES-derived hepatocyte lineage cells via substrate compliance alteration.

[58] Jiang FX, Yurke B, Firestein BL, Langrana NA. Neurite outgrowth on a DNA cross‐ linked hydrogel with tunable stiffnesses. Ann Biomed Eng 2008;36:1565-1579.

[59] Ulijn RV, Bibi N, Jayawarna V, Thornton PD, Todd SJ, Mart RJ, et al. Bioresponsive

[60] Robertus J, Browne WR, Feringa BL. Dynamic control over cell adhesive properties using molecular-based surface engineering strategies. Chem Soc Rev 2010;39:354-378.

[61] Mrksich M. Using self-assembled monolayers to model the extracellular matrix. Acta

[62] Nakanishi J, Kikuchi Y, Takarada T, Nakayama H, Yamaguchi K, Maeda M. Photoac‐ tivation of a substrate for cell adhesion under standard fluorescence microscopes. J

[63] Petersen S, Alonso JM, Specht A, Duodu P, Goeldner M, del Campo A. Phototrigger‐ ing of cell adhesion by caged cyclic RGD peptides. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl

[64] Mendes PM. Stimuli-responsive surfaces for bio-applications. Chem Soc Rev

[65] Yeo WS, Yousaf MN, Mrksich M. Dynamic interfaces between cells and surfaces: electroactive substrates that sequentially release and attach cells. J Am Chem Soc

[66] Mrksich M. A surface chemistry approach to studying cell adhesion. Chem Soc Rev

ences between cell types. J Cell Sci 1981;50:299-314.

cytes. J Biomech 2010;43:469-476.

104 Advances in Biomaterials Science and Biomedical Applications

Ann Biomed Eng 2008;36:865-876.

Biomater 2009;5:832-841.

2008;47:3192-3195.

2008;37:2512-2529.

2003;125:14994-14995.

2000;29:267 - 273.

hydrogels. Materials Today 2007;10:40-48.

Am Chem Soc 2004;126:16314-16315.

omaterials 2009;30:518-525.


[95] Lu YB, Franze K, Seifert G, Steinhauser C, Kirchhoff F, Wolburg H, et al. Viscoelastic properties of individual glial cells and neurons in the CNS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103:17759-17764.

[81] Jiang FX, Yurke B, Schloss RS, Firestein BL, Langrana NA. The relationship between fibroblast growth and the dynamic stiffnesses of a DNA crosslinked hydrogel. Bio‐

[82] Huang S, Ingber DE. Cell tension, matrix mechanics, and cancer development. Can‐

[83] Previtera ML, Trout KL, Verma D, Chippada U, Schloss RS, Langrana NA. Fibroblast morphology on dynamic softening of hydrogels. Ann Biomed Eng 2012;40:1061-1072.

[84] Webster KD, Crow A, Fletcher DA. An AFM-based stiffness clamp for dynamic con‐

[85] Shah S, Lee JY, Verkhoturov S, Tuleuova N, Schweikert EA, Ramanculov E, et al. Ex‐ ercising spatiotemporal control of cell attachment with optically transparent micro‐

[86] Li L, Teller S, Clifton RJ, Jia X, Kiick KL. Tunable mechanical stability and deforma‐ tion response of a resilin-based elastomer. Biomacromolecules 2011;12:2302-2310.

[87] Kurniawan NA, Wong LH, Rajagopalan R. Early stiffening and softening of collagen: interplay of deformation mechanisms in biopolymer networks. Biomacromolecules

[88] Coutinho DF, Sant SV, Shin H, Oliveira JT, Gomes ME, Neves NM, et al. Modified Gellan Gum hydrogels with tunable physical and mechanical properties. Biomateri‐

[89] Krekhova M, Lang T, Richter R, Schmalz H. Thermoreversible hydroferrogels with tunable mechanical properties utilizing block copolymer mesophases as template.

[90] Stahl PJ, Romano NH, Wirtz D, Yu SM. PEG-based hydrogels with collagen mimetic peptide-mediated and tunable physical cross-links. Biomacromolecules

[91] Zustiak SP, Leach JB. Hydrolytically degradable poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel scaf‐ folds with tunable degradation and mechanical properties. Biomacromolecules

[92] Jeon O, Bouhadir KH, Mansour JM, Alsberg E. Photocrosslinked alginate hydrogels with tunable biodegradation rates and mechanical properties. Biomaterials

[93] Mano JF. Stimuli-Responsive Polymeric Systems for Biomedical Applications. Ad‐

[94] Kim S, Chung EH, Gilbert M, Healy KE. Synthetic MMP-13 degradable ECMs based on poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-acrylic acid) semi-interpenetrating polymer net‐ works. I. Degradation and cell migration. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;75:73-88.

materials 2010;31:1199-1212.

106 Advances in Biomaterials Science and Biomedical Applications

trol of rigidity. PLoS One 2011;6:e17807.

electrodes. Langmuir 2008;24:6837-6844.

cer Cell 2005;8:175-176.

2012;13:691-698.

als 2010;31:7494-7502.

2011;11:2336-2344.

2010;11:1348-1357.

2009;30:2724-2734.

vanced Engineering Materials 2008;10:515-527.

Langmuir 2010;26:19181-19190.

[96] Yousaf MN. Model substrates for studies of cell mobility. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2009;13:697-704.
