**1. Introduction**

Lipoxygenases (EC 1.13.11.12) are non-heme iron-containing enzymes that catalyze the site-specific oxygenation of polyunsaturated fatty acids to produce hydroperoxides. Lip‐ oxygenases are suggested to be involved in the early event of atherosclerosis by induc‐ ing plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation [1, 2]. Lipoxygenase inhibitors have also been suggested to be potential cancer chemopreventives [3,4]. On the other hand, lipid peroxidation is well known as one of the major factors in deterioration during the storage and processing of foods, because it can lead to the development of unpleasant rancid or off flavors as well as potentially toxic end products [5]. Hence, lipoxygenase in‐ hibitors should have broad applications [6].

Lipoxygenase inhibitors act in different ways; by chelating the iron of the active site of the enzyme [7, 8] and/or by reducing the ferric form of the enzyme to an inactive ferrous form [9, 10] (Fig. 1). Resorcinol exhibits no effect on this enzyme, indicating that the pentade‐ ca(en)yl tail portion seemed an essential element in eliciting the inhibitory activity. The available information now demonstrates that lipoxygenase inhibitors can be designed when appropriate head portions are selected. 5-Pentadeca(en)yl salicylic acids, commonly known as anacardic acids, were previously reported to inhibit the linoleic acid **(30)** peroxidation cat‐ alyzed by soybean lipoxygenase-1 [11, 12]. This inhibition comes from chelating the iron of the active site of the enzyme but not by reducing the ferric form of the enzyme to an inactive ferrous form. In our structure and activity relationships (SAR) studies with lipoxygenase in‐ hibitors, lipoxygenase inhibitors can be designed mainly by selecting appropriate head por‐ tions (See chemical structures, Fig. 2). Based on this concept, the experiment has been extended to search for lipioxygenase inhibitors acting both by chelating the iron of the active site of the enzyme and by reducing the ferric form of the enzyme to an inactive ferrous form.

© 2013 Kubo et al.; licensee InTech. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. © 2013 Kubo et al.; licensee InTech. This is a paper distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

**Figure 1.** Commercial lipoxygenase contains a non-hemeferrous ion (E*red*) that must be oxidized to yield the catalyti‐ cally active ferric enzyme (E*oxy*) and therefore a catalytic amount of LOOH (13-HPOD, **27**) is usually added as a cofactor to LH (linoleic acid, a substrate, **30**).

### **2. Results**

To begin with, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA, **28**), a well known chelate agent was tested butit did not show any lipoxygenase inhibitory activity, indicating that the chelation ability alone is not enough in eliciting the inhibitory activity. For example, it appears that hydrophilic ligands with a longer alkyl chain length tend to be more potent inhibitors. The molecular lipophilicity has a critical impact on the ability of this class of chelator to inhibit lipoxygenase. Nordihydroguaiuretic acid (NDGA, **26**) is known to inhibit lipoxygenase by reducing the ferric form of the enzyme to an inactive ferrous form but not by chelating the iron of the active site of the enzyme. Hence, various phenolic acids were first tested for their radical scavenging activity using 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH, **29**). This activity can be measured as decolorizing activity following the trapping of the unpaired electron of DPPH. In general, DPPH radical scavenging activity does not take into account the reaction time, and hence, the activity was first observed to be 20 min and then extended to 24 h for comparison. In preliminary experiments, their hexyl, nonyl and dodecyl (lauryl) esters were tested to see if the alkyl group affects scavenging activity. All the esters tested regardless of their alkyl chain length, scavenged six molecules of DPPH. In addition, one molecule of al‐ kyl protocatechuates, regardless of their alkyl chain length, scavenges six molecules of DPPH radical and the alkyl chain length is not associated with the scavenging activity. Thus, alkyl protocatechuatesare oxidized three times by DPPH within 20 min. The scaveng‐ ing activity does not correlate with the hydrophobic alkyl chain length. This is consistent with the previous report with alkyl gallates [13, 14]. Hence, all the alkyl protocatechuates can be used as scavenging antioxidants and selection of the tail portion is flexible. Alkyl pro‐ tocatechuates can be expected to inhibit lipoxygenase by chelating the iron of the active site of theenzyme and by reducing the ferric form of the enzyme to an inactive ferrous form. Both 2,3-dihydroxybenzoic acid (**24**) and 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (**25**) are known to scav‐ enge DPPH [15]. In addition to their hexyl, nonyl and dodecyl esters, the same esters of 3,4 dihydroxyphenyl alkanoates and 2,3-dihydroxyphenyl alkanoates were synthesized and tested for their effect on DPPH. All the esters tested, regardless of their alkyl chain length, were found to scavenge DPPH radicals. In a preliminary test, a series of alkyl 2,3-dihydroxy‐ benzoates and 3,4-dihydroxybenzoates also scavenge DPPH.In addition, 2,3- and 3,4-dihy‐ droxybenzoic acids(**24** and **23**) were previously reported to interact with Fe(II) and inhibit iron-induced oxidative DNA damage [16].

Molecular Design of Soybean Lipoxygenase Inhibitors Based on Natural Products http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/52703 185

**Figure 2.** Chemical structures.

**Figure 1.** Commercial lipoxygenase contains a non-hemeferrous ion (E*red*) that must be oxidized to yield the catalyti‐ cally active ferric enzyme (E*oxy*) and therefore a catalytic amount of LOOH (13-HPOD, **27**) is usually added as a cofactor

A Comprehensive Survey of International Soybean Research - Genetics, Physiology, Agronomy and Nitrogen

To begin with, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA, **28**), a well known chelate agent was tested butit did not show any lipoxygenase inhibitory activity, indicating that the chelation ability alone is not enough in eliciting the inhibitory activity. For example, it appears that hydrophilic ligands with a longer alkyl chain length tend to be more potent inhibitors. The molecular lipophilicity has a critical impact on the ability of this class of chelator to inhibit lipoxygenase. Nordihydroguaiuretic acid (NDGA, **26**) is known to inhibit lipoxygenase by reducing the ferric form of the enzyme to an inactive ferrous form but not by chelating the iron of the active site of the enzyme. Hence, various phenolic acids were first tested for their radical scavenging activity using 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH, **29**). This activity can be measured as decolorizing activity following the trapping of the unpaired electron of DPPH. In general, DPPH radical scavenging activity does not take into account the reaction time, and hence, the activity was first observed to be 20 min and then extended to 24 h for comparison. In preliminary experiments, their hexyl, nonyl and dodecyl (lauryl) esters were tested to see if the alkyl group affects scavenging activity. All the esters tested regardless of their alkyl chain length, scavenged six molecules of DPPH. In addition, one molecule of al‐ kyl protocatechuates, regardless of their alkyl chain length, scavenges six molecules of DPPH radical and the alkyl chain length is not associated with the scavenging activity. Thus, alkyl protocatechuatesare oxidized three times by DPPH within 20 min. The scaveng‐ ing activity does not correlate with the hydrophobic alkyl chain length. This is consistent with the previous report with alkyl gallates [13, 14]. Hence, all the alkyl protocatechuates can be used as scavenging antioxidants and selection of the tail portion is flexible. Alkyl pro‐ tocatechuates can be expected to inhibit lipoxygenase by chelating the iron of the active site of theenzyme and by reducing the ferric form of the enzyme to an inactive ferrous form. Both 2,3-dihydroxybenzoic acid (**24**) and 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (**25**) are known to scav‐ enge DPPH [15]. In addition to their hexyl, nonyl and dodecyl esters, the same esters of 3,4 dihydroxyphenyl alkanoates and 2,3-dihydroxyphenyl alkanoates were synthesized and tested for their effect on DPPH. All the esters tested, regardless of their alkyl chain length, were found to scavenge DPPH radicals. In a preliminary test, a series of alkyl 2,3-dihydroxy‐ benzoates and 3,4-dihydroxybenzoates also scavenge DPPH.In addition, 2,3- and 3,4-dihy‐ droxybenzoic acids(**24** and **23**) were previously reported to interact with Fe(II) and inhibit

to LH (linoleic acid, a substrate, **30**).

iron-induced oxidative DNA damage [16].

**2. Results**

Relationships

184

A homologous series of alkyl (C1-C20) protocatechuates (3,4-dihydroxybenzoates) and their re‐ lated derivatives were previously synthesized by one-step esterification utilizing DCC (*N*,*N'* dicyclohexylcarbodiimide) as an activating agent [17]. The head and tail structures are synthetically easily accessible as esters and therefore the construction of a wide range of struc‐ turally diverse multifunctional mimics are available for evaluation. Thus, there are unlimited choices from common natural products for both head and tail portions. In contrast to their DPPH scavenging activity, the lipoxygenase inhibitory activity of alkyl protocatechuates was found to correlate with their alkyl chain lengths and require a certain head portion. This indi‐ cates that lipoxygenase inhibitors can be designed when appropriate head portions are selected.

The synthesized alkyl protocatechuates (Fig. 2)were tested for their effects on the soybean lipoxygenase-1 catalyzed oxidation of linoleic acid (**30**). Results are listed in Table 1. It ap‐ pears that the inhibitory activity of alkyl protocatechuates was a parabolic function of their lipophilicity and maximized with alkyl chain lengths between C12 and C14. Among the com‐ pounds tested, tetradecanyl (C14) protocatechuate (**8**) showed the most potent inhibition with the concentration leading to 50% activity loss (IC50)of 0.05µM, followed by dodecyl (C12) protocatechuate (**7**) with an IC50 of 0.06µM. On the other hand, their parent com‐ pounds, protocatechuic acid did not show any activity up to 200 µM, indicating that the al‐ kyl chain was an essential element in eliciting the inhibitory activity. It thus appears that hydrophilic ligands with a longer alkyl chain length up to C16 tend to be the more potent inhibitors. Since their head portions are the same, the data are interpreted to mean that changes in the hydrophobic tail portions correlated to the activity. Apparently a small change in chemical structure affects activity to a large extent.



**Table 1.** IC50and*K*<sup>i</sup> values and inhibition type of alkyl protocatechuates against soybean lipoxygenase-1 The inhibitory activity of soybean lipoxygenase-1 was measured by two methods for compar‐ ison, because this enzyme seems to be sensitive to assay conditions. In the current study, lino‐ leic acid (**30**) was used as a substrate. Soybean lipoxygenase-1 is known to catalyze the dioxygenation of the (1*Z*, 4*Z*)-pentadiene moiety of linoleic acid (**30**). In plants, the primary di‐ oxygenation product is 13(*S*)-hydroperoxy-9*Z*,11*E*-octadienoic acid (13-HPOD, **27**) [18]. Hence, the enzyme assay was usually performed using a UV spectrophotometer to detect the increase at 234 nm associated with the (2*Z*, 4*E*)-conjugated double bonds newly formed in the product but not in the substrate. In previous reports, the data were obtained at pH 9 since soy‐ bean lipoxygenase-1 has its optimum activity at pH 9.0 [19], but the absorption at 234 nm suf‐ fered from unstable baseline activity of unknown origin attributable to the presence of the linoleic acid (**30**) substrate. This pseudoactivity of the blank control had to be substracted from activity of the enzyme assay, making precise measurements difficult. Moreover, this basic pH value may not be practical to use for food protection. Since the stable data were obtained at pH 8.0, the evaluation was performed at pH 8.0 [20]. This was also compared with that of NADG (**26**) used as a reference compound. Its IC50 was obtained as 82 µM when the experiment was performed at pH 9.0 but 0.2 µM at pH 8.0. As a result, octyl protocatechuate(3,4-dihydroxyben‐ zoate) (**3**) showed a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on this oxidation as shown in Figure 3. As the concentration of octyl protocatechuate (**3**) increased, the enzyme activity was rapidly de‐ creased with eventual complete suppression. The inhibitory concentration leading to 50% ac‐ tivity loss(IC50) was estimated to be 0.55 µM. As the need arises, the assay was also monitored by using polarography (oxygen consumption) for comparison. The IC50 of octyl protocatechu‐ ate (**3**) obtained was 1.53 µM, which is almost comparable with that measured by the spectro‐ photometric method. The difference of IC50values of these methods is due to a *K*m for linoleic acid (**30**) almost 3-fold larger than using the oxygen monitor. This is in good agreement with previously reported observations [20, 21].

A homologous series of alkyl (C1-C20) protocatechuates (3,4-dihydroxybenzoates) and their re‐ lated derivatives were previously synthesized by one-step esterification utilizing DCC (*N*,*N'* dicyclohexylcarbodiimide) as an activating agent [17]. The head and tail structures are synthetically easily accessible as esters and therefore the construction of a wide range of struc‐ turally diverse multifunctional mimics are available for evaluation. Thus, there are unlimited choices from common natural products for both head and tail portions. In contrast to their DPPH scavenging activity, the lipoxygenase inhibitory activity of alkyl protocatechuates was found to correlate with their alkyl chain lengths and require a certain head portion. This indi‐ cates that lipoxygenase inhibitors can be designed when appropriate head portions are selected.

A Comprehensive Survey of International Soybean Research - Genetics, Physiology, Agronomy and Nitrogen

The synthesized alkyl protocatechuates (Fig. 2)were tested for their effects on the soybean lipoxygenase-1 catalyzed oxidation of linoleic acid (**30**). Results are listed in Table 1. It ap‐ pears that the inhibitory activity of alkyl protocatechuates was a parabolic function of their lipophilicity and maximized with alkyl chain lengths between C12 and C14. Among the com‐ pounds tested, tetradecanyl (C14) protocatechuate (**8**) showed the most potent inhibition with the concentration leading to 50% activity loss (IC50)of 0.05µM, followed by dodecyl (C12) protocatechuate (**7**) with an IC50 of 0.06µM. On the other hand, their parent com‐ pounds, protocatechuic acid did not show any activity up to 200 µM, indicating that the al‐ kyl chain was an essential element in eliciting the inhibitory activity. It thus appears that hydrophilic ligands with a longer alkyl chain length up to C16 tend to be the more potent inhibitors. Since their head portions are the same, the data are interpreted to mean that changes in the hydrophobic tail portions correlated to the activity. Apparently a small

**Compounds IC50 (µM) Inhibition Type** *Ki* **(µM)** (C3) 39.4 Competitive 19.7 (C6) 2.3 Competitive 0.98 (C8) 0.55 Competitive 0.23 (C9) 0.25 – – (C10) 0.15 – – (C11) 0.09 – – (C12) 0.06 Slow-binding – (C14) 0.05 – – (C16) 0.31 – – (C18) 0.42 – – (Geranyl) 0.32 – – (Decahydro-2-naphthyl) 0.1 Slow-binding – (Bornyl) 0.09 – – **14** >100 – –

values and inhibition type of alkyl protocatechuates against soybean lipoxygenase-1

change in chemical structure affects activity to a large extent.


Relationships

186

**Table 1.** IC50and*K*<sup>i</sup>

**Figure 3.** Lineweaver-Burk plots of 13-HPOD (**27**) generation by soybean lipoxygenase-1 in the presence of octyl pro‐ tocathechuate (**3**) at 25 ºC, pH 8.0. Concentrations of octyl protocathechuate (**3**) for curves 0-4 were 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 µM, respectively.

Subsequently, the inhibition kinetics of soybean lipoxygenase-1 by octyl protocatechuate (**3**) was investigated as the representative molecule. The kinetic behavior of soybean lipoxyge‐ nase-1 during the oxidation of linoleic acid (**30**) was studied first. Under the conditions em‐ ployed in the present investigation, the oxidation of linoleic acid (**30**) catalyzed by soybean lipoxygenase-1 follows Michaelis−Menten kinetics. The kinetic parameters for this oxidase obtained from a Lineweaver−Burk plot show that *K*<sup>m</sup> is equal to 20.9µM and *V*max is equal to 6.5µmol/min. The estimated value of *K*<sup>m</sup> obtained with a spectrophotometric method is in good agreement with the previously reported value (20, 21). As illustrated in Figure 3, the inhibition kinetics analyzed by Lineweaver−Burk plots show that octyl protocatechuate (**3**) is a competitive inhibitor because increasing octyl protocatechuate (**3**) resulted in a family of lines with a common intercept on the 1/*v* axis but with different slopes. This may suggest that octyl protocatechuate (**3**) displaces linoleic acid (**30**) from the enzymatic site of oxida‐ tion. The equilibrium constant for inhibitor binding, *K*I, was obtained from a plot of the ap‐ parent Michaelis−Menten constant versus the concentration of octyl protocatechuate (**3**), which is linear.

**Figure 4.** Time-dependent inhibition of soybean lipoxygenase-1 in the presence of dodecyl protocathechuate (**7**). (A) Conditions were as follows: 40 µM linoleic acid (**30**), 1.3 nM lipoxygenase-1, and concentrations of dodecyl protoca‐ thechuate (**7**) for curves 0-7 were 0, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.6 µM, respectively. The *k*obs values at each inhibitor concentration were determined. (B) Dependence of the values for *k*obs on the concentration of dodecyl proto‐ cathechuate (**7**). The *k*obs values, determined on panel A

To investigate the inhibitory effect of dodecyl protocatechuate (**7**) on dioxygenase enzyme, we assayed soybean lipoxygenase-1 activity with the inhibitor. Soybean lipoxygenase-1 showed time-dependent inhibition in the presence of dodecyl protocatechuate (**7**) (Figure 4, panel A). Increasing dodecyl protocatechuate (**7**) concentrations led to the decrease in both the initial ve‐ locity (*v*<sup>i</sup> ) and the steady-state rate (*v*s) in the progress curve. The progress curves obtained us‐ ing various concentrations of the inhibitors were fitted to eq 1 to determine *v*<sup>i</sup> , *v*s, and *k*obs.

$$A = \upsilon\_s t \, + (\upsilon\_l - \upsilon\_s) [1 - \exp(-k\_{obs}t)] / k\_{obs} + A\_0 \tag{1}$$

The plot for *k*obs versus [I] are shown in panel B in Figure 4. That plot showed a hyperbolic de‐ pendence on the concentration of the dodecyl protocatechuate (**7**), so the inhibition of lipoxy‐ genase-1 by dodecyl protocatechuate (**7**) followed mechanism A (Figure 5). The kinetic parameters, *k*5, *k*6, and *K*<sup>i</sup> app were derived from the plots by fitting the results to following eq 2.

$$k\_{obs} = k\_6 + \left[ \left( k\_5 \times \left[ I \right] \right) / \left( K\_{\parallel}^{app} + \left[ I \right] \right) \right] \tag{2}$$

Thus, analysis of data yielded the following values: *k*5 = 9.8x10-3 s-1, *k*6 = 1.5x10-3 s-1, *K*<sup>i</sup> app = 0.23µM.The kinetic model can be written as:

**Figure 5.** The kinetic model of mechanism A

Subsequently, the inhibition kinetics of soybean lipoxygenase-1 by octyl protocatechuate (**3**) was investigated as the representative molecule. The kinetic behavior of soybean lipoxyge‐ nase-1 during the oxidation of linoleic acid (**30**) was studied first. Under the conditions em‐ ployed in the present investigation, the oxidation of linoleic acid (**30**) catalyzed by soybean lipoxygenase-1 follows Michaelis−Menten kinetics. The kinetic parameters for this oxidase obtained from a Lineweaver−Burk plot show that *K*<sup>m</sup> is equal to 20.9µM and *V*max is equal to 6.5µmol/min. The estimated value of *K*<sup>m</sup> obtained with a spectrophotometric method is in good agreement with the previously reported value (20, 21). As illustrated in Figure 3, the inhibition kinetics analyzed by Lineweaver−Burk plots show that octyl protocatechuate (**3**) is a competitive inhibitor because increasing octyl protocatechuate (**3**) resulted in a family of lines with a common intercept on the 1/*v* axis but with different slopes. This may suggest that octyl protocatechuate (**3**) displaces linoleic acid (**30**) from the enzymatic site of oxida‐ tion. The equilibrium constant for inhibitor binding, *K*I, was obtained from a plot of the ap‐ parent Michaelis−Menten constant versus the concentration of octyl protocatechuate (**3**),

A Comprehensive Survey of International Soybean Research - Genetics, Physiology, Agronomy and Nitrogen

**Figure 4.** Time-dependent inhibition of soybean lipoxygenase-1 in the presence of dodecyl protocathechuate (**7**). (A) Conditions were as follows: 40 µM linoleic acid (**30**), 1.3 nM lipoxygenase-1, and concentrations of dodecyl protoca‐ thechuate (**7**) for curves 0-7 were 0, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.6 µM, respectively. The *k*obs values at each inhibitor concentration were determined. (B) Dependence of the values for *k*obs on the concentration of dodecyl proto‐

To investigate the inhibitory effect of dodecyl protocatechuate (**7**) on dioxygenase enzyme, we assayed soybean lipoxygenase-1 activity with the inhibitor. Soybean lipoxygenase-1 showed time-dependent inhibition in the presence of dodecyl protocatechuate (**7**) (Figure 4, panel A). Increasing dodecyl protocatechuate (**7**) concentrations led to the decrease in both the initial ve‐

ing various concentrations of the inhibitors were fitted to eq 1 to determine *v*<sup>i</sup>

) and the steady-state rate (*v*s) in the progress curve. The progress curves obtained us‐

<sup>0</sup> ( )[1 exp( ) / ] *A s is ob obss* = *v t* + *v* - *v* - *t k* +- *Ak* (1)

, *v*s, and *k*obs.

which is linear.

Relationships

188

locity (*v*<sup>i</sup>

cathechuate (**7**). The *k*obs values, determined on panel A

where E, S, I, and P denote enzyme, substrate, inhibitor (dodecyl protocatechuate) (**7**) and product (13-HPOD, **27**), respectively. ES and EI are respective complexes. Because *k*5 is greater than *k*6 the enzyme first quickly and reversibly binds with dodecyl protocatechuate (**7**) and then undergoes a slow interaction of dodecyl group with the hydrophobic portion near the active site. In the case of octyl protocatechuate (**3**) [14], conversely *k*<sup>6</sup> is greater than *k*5, and hence, it was observed as a competitive inhibitor. The effect of dodecyl protocatechu‐ ate (**7**) on the soybean lipoxygenase-1 catalyzed oxidation of linoleic acid (**30**) is similar to octyl protocatechuate (**3**) in many aspects but different to some extents.

Subsequently, the progress curves of 13-HPOD (**27**) generation show thatdecahydro-2-naph‐ thylprotocatechuate (**12**) also inhibited soybean lipoxygenase-1 by slow-binding inhibition mechanism A (Figure 5). The *k*obs values for the decahydro-2-napthyl protocatechuate (**12**) inhibition of lipoxygenase-1 at different concentrations of decahydro-2-napthyl protocatech‐ uate (**12**) were determined by fitting data to the slow-binding equation (eq1). The *k*obs values were plotted as a function ofdecahydro-2-napthyl protocatechuate (**12**) concentration. The results indicated that decahydro-2-napthyl protocatechuate (**12**) inhibits soybean lipoxyge‐ nase-1 by slow enzyme isomerization. This was evidenced by the observation that the *k*obs values exhibited a hyperbolic dependence on the inhibitor concentration as shown in Figure

6B. Thus, analysis of data according to eq2 yielded the following values: *k*5 = 8.8x10-3 s-1, *k*6 = 1.7x10-3 s-1, *K*<sup>i</sup> app = 0.12µM.

**Figure 6.** Time-dependent inhibition of soybean lipoxygenase-1 in the presence of decahydro-2-napthylprotoca‐ thechuate (**12**). Conditions were as follows: 40 µM linoleic acid, 1.3 nM lipoxygenase-1, and concentrations of decahy‐ dro-2-naphtyl protocathechuate for curves 0-8 were 0, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 µM, respectively. The *k*obs values at each inhibitor concentration were determined by fitting the data to eq1. (B) Dependence of the val‐ ues for *k*obs on the concentration of decahydro-2-naphtyl protocathechuate (**12**).

Soybean lipoxygenase-1 was used if dodecyl protocatechuate (**7**) inhibited the linoleic acid (**30**) peroxidation by this enzyme. The result is shown in Figure 4. Dodecyl protocatechuate (**7**) inhibited the linoleic acid (**30**) peroxidation 80% at 30 µg/mL (88.8 µM) and IC50 was es‐ tablished as 3.5 µg/mL (10.3 µM). Soybean lipoxygenase-1 inhibition mechanism of dodecyl protocatechuate (**7**) first competes with the active site, and then the hydrophobic dodecyl side chain interacts with the hydrophobic domain close to the active site in the enzyme. The inhibition of the enzyme by dodecyl protocatechuate (**7**) is a reversible reaction without re‐ sidual activity. The hydrophobic interaction with the enzyme increases with increasing the alkyl chain length. The results imply that the inhibitory activity of soybean lipoxygenase-1 increases with increasing the alkyl chain length.

Some lipoxygenases reduce the ferric form of the enzyme to an inactive ferrous form [9,10]. This enzyme reduction mechanism is directly measurable by electron spin reso‐ nance(ESR)and fluorescence and also is indirectly observable when the inhibitor-dependent decrease in 13-HPOD (**27**) concentration, catalyzed by lipoxygenase-1, using the variation in *A*<sup>234</sup> nm. Nordihydroguaiuretic acid (NDGA, **26**) is a well known soybean lipoxygenase-1 in‐ hibitor. It acts by reducing the catalytically active ferric enzyme to the catalytically inactive ferrous enzyme [9]. As a result, Figure 7 demonstrates the fast decrease in *A*234, observed with addition of NDGA (**26**) in the pseudoperoxidase activity assay system. However, do‐ decyl protocatechuate (**7**) did not have a significant difference between controls. It should be noted that the inhibitor concentration used in this assay (10 µM) was 150-fold higher than the IC50 value for the inhibition of the lipoxygenase reaction. These results indicate that do‐ decyl protocatechuate (**7**) did not convert the catalytically active ferric form to the inactive ferrous form, despite the fact that dodecyl protocatechuate (**7**) inhibition potencies are with‐ in the range of those of reducing inhibitors.

6B. Thus, analysis of data according to eq2 yielded the following values: *k*5 = 8.8x10-3 s-1, *k*6 =

A Comprehensive Survey of International Soybean Research - Genetics, Physiology, Agronomy and Nitrogen

**Figure 6.** Time-dependent inhibition of soybean lipoxygenase-1 in the presence of decahydro-2-napthylprotoca‐ thechuate (**12**). Conditions were as follows: 40 µM linoleic acid, 1.3 nM lipoxygenase-1, and concentrations of decahy‐ dro-2-naphtyl protocathechuate for curves 0-8 were 0, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 µM, respectively. The *k*obs values at each inhibitor concentration were determined by fitting the data to eq1. (B) Dependence of the val‐

Soybean lipoxygenase-1 was used if dodecyl protocatechuate (**7**) inhibited the linoleic acid (**30**) peroxidation by this enzyme. The result is shown in Figure 4. Dodecyl protocatechuate (**7**) inhibited the linoleic acid (**30**) peroxidation 80% at 30 µg/mL (88.8 µM) and IC50 was es‐ tablished as 3.5 µg/mL (10.3 µM). Soybean lipoxygenase-1 inhibition mechanism of dodecyl protocatechuate (**7**) first competes with the active site, and then the hydrophobic dodecyl side chain interacts with the hydrophobic domain close to the active site in the enzyme. The inhibition of the enzyme by dodecyl protocatechuate (**7**) is a reversible reaction without re‐ sidual activity. The hydrophobic interaction with the enzyme increases with increasing the alkyl chain length. The results imply that the inhibitory activity of soybean lipoxygenase-1

Some lipoxygenases reduce the ferric form of the enzyme to an inactive ferrous form [9,10]. This enzyme reduction mechanism is directly measurable by electron spin reso‐ nance(ESR)and fluorescence and also is indirectly observable when the inhibitor-dependent decrease in 13-HPOD (**27**) concentration, catalyzed by lipoxygenase-1, using the variation in *A*<sup>234</sup> nm. Nordihydroguaiuretic acid (NDGA, **26**) is a well known soybean lipoxygenase-1 in‐ hibitor. It acts by reducing the catalytically active ferric enzyme to the catalytically inactive ferrous enzyme [9]. As a result, Figure 7 demonstrates the fast decrease in *A*234, observed with addition of NDGA (**26**) in the pseudoperoxidase activity assay system. However, do‐ decyl protocatechuate (**7**) did not have a significant difference between controls. It should be noted that the inhibitor concentration used in this assay (10 µM) was 150-fold higher than the IC50 value for the inhibition of the lipoxygenase reaction. These results indicate that do‐

ues for *k*obs on the concentration of decahydro-2-naphtyl protocathechuate (**12**).

increases with increasing the alkyl chain length.

1.7x10-3 s-1, *K*<sup>i</sup>

Relationships

190

app = 0.12µM.

**Figure 7.** Effects of NDGA (**26**) and dodecyl protpcatechuate (**7**) on soybean lipoxygenase-1 catalyzed consumption of 13-HPOD (**27**). The conditions of incubation were 0 (1), 10 µM dodecyl protocatechuate (2), and 10 µM NDGA (3) with 13-HPOD (15 µM, **27**) at 25ºC in Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0. Dodecyl protocatechuate (**7**) did not reduce the catalytically active ferric form to the inactive ferrous form.

Since the head portion of alkyl protocatechuates is the same, the data are interpreted to mean that changes in the hydrophobic tail portions correlate and are responsible for this specific activity. As far as protocatechuic acid (**23**) is concerned, it remains the head portion. Their lipoxygenase inhibitory activity can be designed by selecting a side chain length to give the appropriate partition coefficient (log *P*) as a standard and the maximum activity was observed to be around 6. However, it should be noted that other factors are also possi‐ bly associated with the activity. For example, the introduction of branching or unsaturation into the hydrophobic moiety is known to increase the solubility of the molecules in water and consequently may be associated with the activity [23]. Since geranyl protocatechuate (**11**), decahydro-2-naphthyl protocatechuate (**12**) and bornylprotocatechuate (**13**) showed po‐ tent inhibitory activity, the hydrophobic portion can be flexible. In brief, the hydrophilic head moiety requires a certain specific structural feature but the hydrophobic tail portion is flexible. As mentioned earlier, the head and tail structures are synthetically easily accessible as esters and therefore the design of a wide range of structurally diverse lipoxygenase inhib‐ itors can be available for evaluation. Thus, there are unlimited choices from common natural products for both head and tail portions. The target molecules can be designed using their log *P* values as a standard. Based on this concept, bornylprotocatechuate (**13**) was synthe‐ sized by connecting two common natural products, protocatechuic acid (**23**) and borneol, as an example. Thus, bornylprotocatechuate (**13**) inhibited the lipoxygenase-catalyzed peroxi‐ dation of linolenic acid (**30**) with an IC50 of 0.09 µM.

Based on the head and tail concept, octylgallate(3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoate) (**31**) [13] and do‐ decyl gallate (**16**) [14] were found to be potent lipoxygenase inhibitors. Since alkyl gallates are known to have iron binding properties, their galloyl moiety initially and rapidly binds with the active site as a chelator and then the alkyl group undergoes a slow interaction with

the hydrophobic environment. The same head and tail concept has been extended to evalu‐ ate octylprotocatechuate (**3**) and dodecyl protocatechuate (**7**), and both were found to show even slightly more potent inhibitory activity than that of the corresponding alkyl gallates. On the other hand, dodecyl 3,5-dihydroxybenzoate (**17**) which does not have an ability to chelate ironwas alsoevaluated for comparison. This resorcinol derivative was also found to inhibitthe enzymatic linoleic acid (**30**) peroxidation, but to a much lesser extent compared to dodecyl gallate (**16**) or dodecyl protocatechuate (**7**). It appears that the activity of dodecyl gallate (**16**), which has the ability to chelate iron, is conspicuously potent. Compared to an acardic acid (C15:0) (**15**), dodecylgallate (**16**) is nearly 200-fold more potent (Table 2). In the case of alky gallates, the hydrophilic ligands with a longer alkyl side chain of up to C14 in length tend to be the more potent inhibitors [14]. Since their hydrophilic head portions are the same, the data are consequently interpreted to mean that changes in the hydrophobic tail portions correlated to the activity.On the one hand, dodecyl 3,4-dihydroxy-5-methoxy‐ benzoate (**18**) still exhibited this inhibitory activity but to a much lesser extent compared to that of dodecyl gallate (**16**). This noticeable inferior activity can be explained by a steric hin‐ drance to its approach to the active site in the enzyme, but dodecyl gallate (**16**) still reduces the ferric form of the enzyme to an inactive ferrous form. It would thus seem that a relative‐ ly small change in chemical structure of these molecules affects their biological activity to a large extent. The activity of alkyl 3,4-dihydroxybenzoates was compared with those of alkyl 2,3-dihydroxybenzoates, and thus the differences should be due to imply the hydrophilic head portions. Noticeably, dodecyl protocatechuate (**7**) showed potent lipoxygenase inhibi‐ tory activity with an IC50 value of 0.06 µM, whereas 3,4-dihydroxyphenyltridecanoate (**32**) also exhibited the inhibitory activity but to a much lesser extent. In these catechol (**35**) struc‐ tures, the head and tail portions are connected as esters, either -COOR or -OCOR. Thus, the ester groups, either an electron withdrawing (-COOR) or an electron donating (-OCOR), were connected at the C-5 position to the catechol (**35**) moiety. The results obtained indicate that –COO Resters exhibited more potent inhibitory activity compared to the corresponding -OCOR esters, although the reason for this still remains obscure.


**Table 2.** Lipoxygenase-1 inhibitory related activity of selected compounds

The data obtained so far indicates that alkyl 3,4-dihydroxybenzoates can be expected as su‐ perior as lipoxygenase inhibitors similar to the alkyl 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoates. It should be noted, however, that alkyl 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoates were oxidized in part in basic condi‐ tion. The lipoxygenase assay was performed using a UV spectrophotometer to detect the in‐ crease at 234 nm associated with the (2*Z*, 4*E*)-conjugated double bonds newly formed in the product but not the substrate. In previous reports, the data were obtained at pH 9 since soy‐ bean lipoxygenase-1 had its optimum pH at 9.0 [19]. Alkyl 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoates were oxidized in part at pH 9 and therefore their data, obtained with the lipoxygenase inhibi‐ tion,may not be their effects. Pyrogallol (1,2,3-benzentriol, **33**) was previously described to react with dioxygen in weakly alkaline solution to form purpurogallin (2,3,4,6-tetrahy‐ droxy-5*H*-benzocycloheptene-5-one, **34**) [24]. Notably, alkyl gallates were oxidized in part at pH 9 but alkyl protocatechuates were not.

The data obtained so far indicates that alkyl 3,4-dihydroxybenzoates can be expected as su‐ perior as lipoxygenase inhibitors similar to the alkyl 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoates. It should be noted, however, that alkyl 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoates were oxidized in part in basic condi‐ tion. The lipoxygenase assay was performed using a UV spectrophotometer to detect the in‐ crease at 234 nm associated with the (2*Z*, 4*E*)-conjugated double bonds newly formed in the product but not the substrate. In previous reports, the data were obtained at pH 9 since soy‐ bean lipoxygenase-1 had its optimum pH at 9.0 [19]. Alkyl 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoates were oxidized in part at pH 9 and therefore their data obtained with the lipoxygenase inhibition may not be their effects. The data obtained so far indicates that alkyl 3,4-dihydroxyben‐ zoates can be expected as superiorlipoxygenase inhibitors. Hence, a series of alkyl 3,4-dihy‐ droxybenzoates was assayed in detail for their effects on the linoleic acid (**30**) peroxidation catalysed by the soybean lipoxygenase-1.

In contrast to their DPPH scavenging activity, the lipoxygenase inhibitory activity of alkyl protocatechuates was found to correlate with their alkyl chain lengths and require a certain head portion. This indicates that lipoxygenase inhibitors can be designed when appropriate head portions are selected. For example, dodecyl 3,5-dihydroxybenzoate (**17**) exhibited any lipoxygenase inhibitory activity up to 200 µg/mL.
