**Importance of Fracture Closure to Cuttings Injection Efficiency**

Mao Bai, Arturo Diaz, John McLennan and Juan Reyna

Additional information is available at the end of the chapter

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/56070

#### **Abstract**

[38] Papanastasiou, P. C, & Thiercelin, M. Influence of Inelastic Rock Behaviour in Hy‐ draulic Fracturing. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Science, (1993). [39] Perkins, T. K, & Gonzales, J. A. The effect of thermoelastic stresses on injection well

[40] PollardDavid D., and Atilla Aydin. Progress in understanding jointing over the past century. *Geological Society of America Bulletin* 100.(1988). , 8(1988), 1181-1204.

[41] Seeburger, D. A, & Zoback, M. D. The Distribution of natural fractures and joints at

[42] Sondergeld, C. H, Newsham, K. E, Comisky, J. T, Rice, M. C, & Rai, C. S. (2010). Pet‐ rophysical considerations in evaluating and producing shale gas resources. SPE-

[43] Tvergaard, V, & Hutchinson, J. W. Effect of strain-dependent cohesive zone model on predictions of crack growth resistance. International Journal of Solids and Struc‐

[44] van den HoekP., van den Berg, J., Shlyapobersky, J.; Theoretical and experimental in‐ vestigation of rock dilatancy near the tip of a propagating hydraulic fracture. Interna‐

[45] Warpinski, N. R, & Teufel, L. W. Influence of geologic discontinuities on hydraulic fracture propagation, Journal of Petroleum Technology, page: (1987). , 209-220. [46] Zhou, X, Aydin, A, Liu, F, & Pollard, D. D. Numerical modelling of secondary ther‐ mal fractures in hot dry geothermal reservoirs. Proceedings in Thirty-Fifth Work‐ shop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Stanford University, Stanford, California,

[47] ZhouFenghua, and Jean-Francois Molinari. Dynamic crack propagation with cohe‐ sive elements: a methodology to address mesh dependency. International Journal for

Depth in crystalline rock. Journal of Geophysical Research, (1982).

tional Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, (1993).

Numerical Methods in Engineering 59.(2004). , 1(2004), 1-24.

fracturing. SPE Journal (SPE PA), (1985). , 11332.

131768

tures, (1996).

792 Effective and Sustainable Hydraulic Fracturing

February 1-3, (2010). SGP-TR-188).

The major benefit of adequate fracture closure is to release injection pressure and restore it to its initial magnitude during the shut-in period to prevent gradual pressure build-up over the injection batches that follow. This paper examines a number of injection cases where the benefits of adequate fracture closure and the detrimental impacts of insufficient fracture closure are respectively revealed.

In-depth examination of fracture closure impact can be set for short durations with relatively fewer injection batches, as well as for long periods with numerous batch injections. The former scenario focuses on determining the physics of the individual fracture closure, while the latter situation emphasizes the general trend with respect to peak pressure at the end of injection and terminal pressure at the end of the shut-in period.

In addition, this paper addresses the added complexities during fracture closing after shut-in that can be identified from the relationship between injection pressure and the G function superposition derivative. Straight-line behavior usually indicates that the formation is homogeneous and leak-off from the fracture into the formation is linear. Other responses such as concave or convex shapes of the G superposition derivative relationship may indicate the formation is either naturally fractured or tight (i.e., low permeability). Or, the pressure decline shapes may imply fracture tip extension, or fracture height recession. Direct examination of the pressure decline curves may reveal the relationship between the fracture responses and formation characteristics.

© 2013 Bai et al.; licensee InTech. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. © 2013 The Author(s). Licensee InTech. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
