**4. Results and conclusions**

Interactive transparent 3D visualizations of GPR data volumes were produced for each part of 6 human statues and a group of 24 lion sculptures at Anitkabir, Turkey. We produced images of natural internal cavities and fractures within the statues via a proposed method of interac‐ tive transparent 3D half bird's-eye visualization of the GPR data volume of the profile range and the depth range.

Earth Sciences Application and Research Center (YEBIM) for supporting the projects. The authors also thank Prof. Yusuf Kagan Kadioglu, head of the Geological Engineering Dept., Ankara University, Turkey; Asst. Prof. Ali Akin Akyol, Baskent Vocational Higher School Program of Restoration and Conservation, Ankara University; and the MSc student group of the Ankara University Geophysical and Geological Engineering Departments for helping us

Transparent 2d/3d Half Bird's-Eye View of Ground Penetrating Radar Data Set in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/54998

135

1 Ankara University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Geophysical Engineering,

[1] Daniels JJ. Ground Penetrating Radar for Imaging Archaeological Objects in the Sub‐ surface: Proceedings of the New Millennium International Forum on Consideration

[2] Daniels DJ. Ground Penetrating Radar. The Institution of Electrical Engineers. Sec‐

[3] Davis JL, Annan AP. Ground-Penetrating Radar for High Resolution Mapping of Soil

[4] Grandjean G, Gourry JC. GPR Data Processing for 3D Fracture Mapping in a Marble

[5] Orlando L. Ground Penetrating Radar in Massive Rock: A Case History. European

[6] Grasmueck M. 3-D Ground Penetrating Radar Applied to Fracture Imaging in

[7] Grasmueck M, Weger R, and Horstmeyer H. Full-Resolution 3D GPR Imaging. Geo‐

and Rock Stratigraphy. Geophysical Prospecting 1989; 37 531–555.

Quarry (Thassos, Greece). Journal of Applied Geophysics 1999; 36 19–30.

Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 2002; 7 265–279.

2 Ankara University, Earth Sciences Application and Research Center, Ankara, Turkey

in data collection at Anitkabir.

Address all correspondence to: kadioglu@ankara.edu.tr

of Cultural Property, Kongju, Korea. 2000; 247-265.

ond Edition, London, United Kingdom, 2004.

Gneiss. Geophysics 1996; 61 (4) 1050–1064.

physics 2005; 70 (1) K12-K19.

**Author details**

Selma Kadioglu1,2\*

Ankara, Turkey

**References**

Our first approximation related to amplitude–colour simplification. This allowed us to differentiate and locate native micro-cavities and micro-fractures inside the statues, based on radargrams of the profiles gathered on the surface of the statues. The second approximation related to our proposed opacity function, which dominated maximum positive and negative amplitudes and eliminated other irrelevant amplitudes. Third, an interactive transparent 3D half bird's-eye view of the 2D GPR data set was achieved by carefully assigning the amplitude– colour scale and its opacity range, together with a carefully selected viewing angle, profile and/ or depth range. The transparent 3D imaging proved successful in identifying changes in the statues, accurate *x–y* locations and accurate depths. This monitoring replied to the aim of the study. Mapping fractures and cavities within statue groups could enable evaluation of their stability and indicate the best way to minimize restoration costs.

In the fourth approximation, the present study developed an improved amplitude-balancing approximation in order to reveal and differentiate subsurface historical remains from the surrounding soil medium. By combining the second and third approximations, the balancing of the amplitude–colour scale achieved sufficiently high resolution to represent the remains with the same colour ranges on both the slices and their transparent 3D imaging with increas‐ ing depth axis. A viewing angle was allocated to the x, y and z axes of the 3D data-volume by checking wall orientations and the data measurement directions on the map to obtain a good half bird's-eye view. The transparent 3D half bird's-eye view of the 2D GPR data set provided better imaging to accurately visualize the subsurface by sensing x–y locations and depths. The results demonstrated that the GPR method and our developed 3D visualization gave perfect results in a closed, circular area including remnants of very complex buried foundational wall, including a cemetery, within the Zeynel Bey tomb without any risk of damage to the tomb and infrastructures. In addition, the results also indicated that the visualization method perfectly monitored the archaeological buried walls with accurate x–y locations and accurate depths.

We also indicated that GPR method provides highly accurate results for the position and depth of targets within very complex and restricted areas, even on statues.
