**1. Introduction**

54 Metal Forming – Process, Tools, Design

2009,34(4):73-78.

[7] X.Y. Wang, K. Ouyang, J.C. Xia, G.A. Hu. FEM analysis of drawing-thickening technology in stamping-forging hybrid process. Forging & stamping technology.

[8] X.Y. Wang, W.T. Luo, J.C. Xia, G.A. Hu. Investigation of warm stamping forging process for car flywheel panel. Forging & stamping technology. 2009,34(5):33-36. [9] J.C. Luo, X.Y. Wang, M.L. Guo, J.C. Xia. Precision research in sheet metal flanging and

upset extruding. Materials Research Innovations, 2011,15(S1):439-442.

Sheet-metal forming processes are technologically among the most important metalworking processes. Products made by these processes include a large variety of shapes and sizes. Typical examples are automobile bodies, aircraft panels, appliance bodies, kitchen utensils and beverage cans [1].

Among the various sheet-metal forming processes, hydroforming is one of the nontraditional ones. This process is also called hydromechanical forming, hydraulic forming or hydropunch forming. In hydroforming process, liquid is used as the medium of energy transfer to form the workpiece. The part is formed on a female die, with the liquid under pressure acting in place of a conventional solid punch [1].

Hydroforming is applied more and more in the modern manufacturing industry. Comparing with the solid punch stretching process, hydroforming process results in a better strain state in the workpiece, so that a deeper draw can be achieved. The friction between tools and blank is greatly reduced. The advantages of hydroforming include low tooling cost, flexibility and ease of operation, low tool wear, no damage to the surface of the sheet, and capability to form complex shapes [2].

#### *Types of hydroforming process*

Hydroforming process is divided into two main groups; sheet hydroforming and tube hydroforming. These are briefly stated in the following sections.

#### *Tube hydroforming process*

Tube HydroForming (THF) is a process of forming hollow parts with different cross sections by applying simultaneously an internal hydraulic pressure and axial compressive loads to force a tubular blank to conform to the shape of a given die. Geometry of die and workpiece,

initial tube dimension, tube anisotropy, and internal pressure are of the important parameters in this process [3].

Developments in Sheet Hydroforming for Complex Industrial Parts 57

Sheet hydroforming process is an alternative to drawing process where either punch or die is replaced by hydraulic medium, which generates the pressure and forms the part. Sheet hydroforming is classified into two types Sheet HydroForming with Punch (SHF-P) and Sheet HydroForming with Die (SHF-D). In SHF-P (Figure 2(a)), the hydraulic fluid is replaced with the die, while in SHF-D (Figure 2(b)), the hydraulic fluid is replaced with the

punch. Absence of either punch or die in SHF process reduces the tooling cost [9].

**Figure 2.** Schematic of the sheet hydroforming process: (a) SHF-P, (b) SHF-D [9]

Some new sheet hydroforming processes have been introduced during the last few years. Thiruvarudchelvan and Lewis [10], Anwar Kandil [11], and Zhang and Danckert [12] studied the standard hydroforming process. Figure 3 illustrates the tool set-up for this process. An essential part of this set-up is a rubber diaphragm that seals the liquid in the pressure chamber. During the process, the flange of the part is kept pushed against the blank holder by the fluid pressure transmitted through the diaphragm. There are many advantages for the standard hydroforming process, such as better surface quality and forming of complex shapes. Meanwhile, it has some disadvantages, such as the requirement of heavy presses. In addition, it is easy to destroy the rubber diaphragm, since the diaphragm is nearly under a similar deformation as the workpiece [10]. The fluid pressure is very important in this process, because wrinkles will appear if the pressure is not sufficiently high. If the pressure is too high, the blank may be damaged by rupture [12].

(a) (b)

The hydromechanical deep drawing process has been developed by researchers on the basis of the standard hydroforming technology [10, 12]. Figure 4(a) shows the schematic illustration of this process. The fluid pressure in this process can be produced by the downward movement of the punch, or be supplied by a hydraulic system, since no rubber diaphragm is used. The tool device in this process is similar to that in a conventional deep

*Sheet hydroforming process* 

*Types of sheet hydroforming process* 

With the advancements in computer control and high-pressure hydraulic systems, this process has become a viable method for mass production, especially with the use of internal pressure of up to 6000 bars. Tube hydroforming offers several advantages as compared to conventional manufacturing processes. These advantages include; a) part consolidation, b) weight reduction through more efficient section design, c) improved structural strength and stiffness, d) lower tooling cost due to fewer parts, e) fewer secondary operations (no welding of sections required and holes may be pierced during hydroforming), and f) tight dimensional tolerances. Despite several benefits over stamping process, THF technology is still not fully implemented in the automotive industry due to its time-consuming part and process development [4].

In THF, compressive stresses occur in regions where the tube material is axially fed, and tensile stresses occur in expansion regions. The main failure modes are buckling, wrinkling (excessively high compressive stress) and bursting (excessively high tensile stress). It is clear that only an appropriate relationship between internal pressure curve versus time, and axial feed curve versus time, so called Loading Paths (LP), guarantees a successful THF process without any of the failures [5].

Hydroformed tubular parts vary over a wide range of shapes. This variety goes from a simple bulged tube to an engine cradle with multiple part features such as bends, protrusions, and complex cross sections. It is necessary to classify the THF parts into different categories with respect to common characteristics that they have in order to handle the design process more efficiently [6]. Figure 1 shows some types of parts which are produced in this process.

**Figure 1.** Tube hydroformed parts: (a) cylindrical stepped tube, (b) conical stepped tube, (c) rectangular stepped tube, (d) bellows [3-8]

#### *Sheet hydroforming process*

56 Metal Forming – Process, Tools, Design

parameters in this process [3].

process development [4].

without any of the failures [5].

produced in this process.

stepped tube, (d) bellows [3-8]

initial tube dimension, tube anisotropy, and internal pressure are of the important

With the advancements in computer control and high-pressure hydraulic systems, this process has become a viable method for mass production, especially with the use of internal pressure of up to 6000 bars. Tube hydroforming offers several advantages as compared to conventional manufacturing processes. These advantages include; a) part consolidation, b) weight reduction through more efficient section design, c) improved structural strength and stiffness, d) lower tooling cost due to fewer parts, e) fewer secondary operations (no welding of sections required and holes may be pierced during hydroforming), and f) tight dimensional tolerances. Despite several benefits over stamping process, THF technology is still not fully implemented in the automotive industry due to its time-consuming part and

In THF, compressive stresses occur in regions where the tube material is axially fed, and tensile stresses occur in expansion regions. The main failure modes are buckling, wrinkling (excessively high compressive stress) and bursting (excessively high tensile stress). It is clear that only an appropriate relationship between internal pressure curve versus time, and axial feed curve versus time, so called Loading Paths (LP), guarantees a successful THF process

Hydroformed tubular parts vary over a wide range of shapes. This variety goes from a simple bulged tube to an engine cradle with multiple part features such as bends, protrusions, and complex cross sections. It is necessary to classify the THF parts into different categories with respect to common characteristics that they have in order to handle the design process more efficiently [6]. Figure 1 shows some types of parts which are

**Figure 1.** Tube hydroformed parts: (a) cylindrical stepped tube, (b) conical stepped tube, (c) rectangular

(a) (b) (c) (d)

Sheet hydroforming process is an alternative to drawing process where either punch or die is replaced by hydraulic medium, which generates the pressure and forms the part. Sheet hydroforming is classified into two types Sheet HydroForming with Punch (SHF-P) and Sheet HydroForming with Die (SHF-D). In SHF-P (Figure 2(a)), the hydraulic fluid is replaced with the die, while in SHF-D (Figure 2(b)), the hydraulic fluid is replaced with the punch. Absence of either punch or die in SHF process reduces the tooling cost [9].

**Figure 2.** Schematic of the sheet hydroforming process: (a) SHF-P, (b) SHF-D [9]

#### *Types of sheet hydroforming process*

Some new sheet hydroforming processes have been introduced during the last few years. Thiruvarudchelvan and Lewis [10], Anwar Kandil [11], and Zhang and Danckert [12] studied the standard hydroforming process. Figure 3 illustrates the tool set-up for this process. An essential part of this set-up is a rubber diaphragm that seals the liquid in the pressure chamber. During the process, the flange of the part is kept pushed against the blank holder by the fluid pressure transmitted through the diaphragm. There are many advantages for the standard hydroforming process, such as better surface quality and forming of complex shapes. Meanwhile, it has some disadvantages, such as the requirement of heavy presses. In addition, it is easy to destroy the rubber diaphragm, since the diaphragm is nearly under a similar deformation as the workpiece [10]. The fluid pressure is very important in this process, because wrinkles will appear if the pressure is not sufficiently high. If the pressure is too high, the blank may be damaged by rupture [12].

The hydromechanical deep drawing process has been developed by researchers on the basis of the standard hydroforming technology [10, 12]. Figure 4(a) shows the schematic illustration of this process. The fluid pressure in this process can be produced by the downward movement of the punch, or be supplied by a hydraulic system, since no rubber diaphragm is used. The tool device in this process is similar to that in a conventional deep

drawing. An O-ring is used to prevent the flow out of the fluid on the flange. By using this process, more local deformation, increased drawing ratio and forming of complicated parts are realized [10]. But, in this method the blank holder force is not sufficient to prevent complex shapes from wrinkling. In addition, the fluid pressure is very high that causes high clamping force, and thus, heavy presses are required.

Developments in Sheet Hydroforming for Complex Industrial Parts 59

**Figure 4.** Tool set-up for: (a) hydromechanical, (b) hydro-rim, deep drawing process [9]

(a) (b)

**Figure 5.** A simplified schematic of tool set-up for active-elastic blank holder system [9]

**Figure 6.** A simplified schematic of tool set-up for hydrodynamic deep drawing [16]

**2. Applications and limitations of sheet hydroforming process [9-16]** 

Each of the sheet hydroforming mentioned above has its own limitations and applications. Sheet hydroforming process would be useful in reducing weight and cost simultaneously by

The hydromechanical deep drawing process has been developed as the radial hydromechanical deep drawing (hydro-rim) process (Figure 4(b)) [13]. In this process, when the punch goes down into the die cavity, the blank is forced into the die cavity filled with liquid. The liquid will be pressurized and will push the blank tightly on the punch surface. Also, the liquid pressure exists around the blank rim. This, in turn, can realize some forced radial feeding which is difficult in the current sheet hydroforming processes. In this method, since there is no clamping force (with rigid or semi-rigid part), wrinkling will occur easily in the forming of complex shapes.

In another investigation, Groche and Metz [14, 15] used an active-elastic blank holder system for high-pressure forming. Figure 5 illustrates the simplified schematic of this system. In this method, an elastic blank holder with a circular groove was used under the blank. The active-elastic blank holder system showed improvements with respect to the material flow in the flange area and reduced sheet thinning in critical corner regions of the workpiece. In this method the die set-up is complicated and the forming pressure is high.

Among the sheet hydroforming processes, hydrodynamic deep drawing assisted by radial pressure (HDDRP) has been used to form complex shapes and has a good drawing ratio [16]. This process is shown in Figure 6.

**Figure 3.** Tool set-up for standard hydroforming [9]

Developments in Sheet Hydroforming for Complex Industrial Parts 59

**Figure 4.** Tool set-up for: (a) hydromechanical, (b) hydro-rim, deep drawing process [9]

58 Metal Forming – Process, Tools, Design

the forming of complex shapes.

[16]. This process is shown in Figure 6.

**Figure 3.** Tool set-up for standard hydroforming [9]

clamping force, and thus, heavy presses are required.

drawing. An O-ring is used to prevent the flow out of the fluid on the flange. By using this process, more local deformation, increased drawing ratio and forming of complicated parts are realized [10]. But, in this method the blank holder force is not sufficient to prevent complex shapes from wrinkling. In addition, the fluid pressure is very high that causes high

The hydromechanical deep drawing process has been developed as the radial hydromechanical deep drawing (hydro-rim) process (Figure 4(b)) [13]. In this process, when the punch goes down into the die cavity, the blank is forced into the die cavity filled with liquid. The liquid will be pressurized and will push the blank tightly on the punch surface. Also, the liquid pressure exists around the blank rim. This, in turn, can realize some forced radial feeding which is difficult in the current sheet hydroforming processes. In this method, since there is no clamping force (with rigid or semi-rigid part), wrinkling will occur easily in

In another investigation, Groche and Metz [14, 15] used an active-elastic blank holder system for high-pressure forming. Figure 5 illustrates the simplified schematic of this system. In this method, an elastic blank holder with a circular groove was used under the blank. The active-elastic blank holder system showed improvements with respect to the material flow in the flange area and reduced sheet thinning in critical corner regions of the workpiece. In this method the die set-up is complicated and the forming pressure is high.

Among the sheet hydroforming processes, hydrodynamic deep drawing assisted by radial pressure (HDDRP) has been used to form complex shapes and has a good drawing ratio

**Figure 5.** A simplified schematic of tool set-up for active-elastic blank holder system [9]

**Figure 6.** A simplified schematic of tool set-up for hydrodynamic deep drawing [16]
