**7. References**

Hahn, S. L. (1996). *Hilbert Transforms in Signal Processing*, Artech House, Inc., Norwood, MA, USA.

Hardy, G. H. (1932). On hilbert transforms, *Quart. J. Math. (Oxford)* 3: 102–112.

King, F. W. (2009a). *Hilbert Transforms, Vol. 1*, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. King, F. W. (2009b). *Hilbert Transforms, Vol. 2*, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.


10 Will-be-set-by-IN-TECH

300 Fourier Transform Applications

Liu, Y.-W. & Smith, J. O. (2002). Perceptually similar orthogonal sounds and applications to

Nie, K., Barco, A. & Zeng, F.-G. (2006). Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech

Oppenheim, A. V. & Schafer, R. W. (2010). *Discrete-Time Signal Processing, 3rd Edition*, Pearson,

Potamianos, A. & Maragos, P. (1994). A comparison of the energy operator and the hilbert

Recio-Spinoso, A., Fan, Y.-H. & Ruggero, M. (2011). Basilar-membrane responses to

Scott, A. (1970). *Active and Nonlinear Wave Propagation in Electronics*, Wiley-Interscience, New

Smith, Z. M., Delgutte, B. & Oxenham, A. J. (2002). Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in

van Drongelen, W. (2007). *Signal Processing for Neuroscientists: Introduction to the analysis of*

Zeng, F.-G., Rebscher, S., Harrison, W., Sun, X. & Feng, H. (2008). Cochlear implants: System design, integration, and evaluation, *IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng.* 1: 115–142.

*Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on* 58(5): 1456 –1465.

Finland.

Boston.

120.

York.

perception, *Ear Hear.* 27: 208–217.

auditory perception, *Nature* 416: 87–90.

*physiological signals*, Academic Press, London.

multichannel acoustic echo canceling, *Proc. Audio Eng. Soc. 22nd Int. Conf.*, Espoo,

transform approach to signal and speech demodulation, *Signal Processing* 37(1): 95 –

broadband noise modeled using linear filters with rational transfer functions,
