**Expert 2**

Q1.


Q2


Q3


#### **Expert 3**

Q1


Q2


Increase support to students – building closer ties

Simulation capabilities – make it interesting

Technology devices – current trends – Ipad

personnel's in given advice and solutions

using technology as an aided tool

Creates an environment of competitiveness (students)

Mobile application capability – fast accessibility to lecturers

Visual screen capture – to be stored in repository for reference

Improves logical thinking process – via games or simulations

 Simulation capabilities – able to help simulate programming topics Mobile application capability – making communication effective Visual screen capture – to capture screen of programming process

Multi-lingual – to assist international students as a supporting application

Builds interest – current technology trends being practiced – keeping up with IT

Forum – all stakeholders – industry based online forum where we assist industry

Games simulation capabilities – enabling better understanding of programming

Provides options of teaching process – different from traditional method of teaching

Improves logical thinking process via games or simulations – logic approaches

Increases student support – building closer ties – anywhere, anytime concept

 Available – mobility – accessing the materials becomes easily accessible Engaging in industrial relation or ties – real experience gained on real work

Enables self-study – encourages independent study of student

 Enables self-study Availability – mobility

Vendor Support

Real-time data capture

savvy skills of students

Management support

User friendly

 Enables self-study Available – mobility

Training

**Expert 2**  Q1.

Q3.

Q2

Q3

Training

principles

scenarios

simplified.

**Expert 3**  Q1

Q2



Q3


A Roadmap for Requirements Elicitation of

**12. References** 

251-252.

Knowledge Management Systems: A Delphi Study 69

today which is the aspect of contribution. If contributions are not forthcoming, then even the most illustrious KMS will not serve its intended purpose. The proposed KMS roadmap does not illustrate a detailed outline of the development processes required to implement a KMS

Abecker, A., Decker, S. and Maurer, F. (2000) 'Organizational Memory and Knowledge

Ackerman, M. S. and Halverson, C. A. (2000) 'Reexamining Organizational Memory',

Benbye, H (2008). Knowledge Management Systems Implementation: Lessons from the

Davenport, T.H. and Prusak, L. (1998), Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage

Floyd, C.: 1992, 'Software Development as Reality Construction'. In: C. Floyd, H.

I. Rus, and M. Lindvall, "Knowledge management in software engineering," IEEE Software,

J. S. Edwards, "Managing software engineers and their knowledge," in Managing Software

Lang, J. C. (2001). Managerial concerns in knowledge management. *Journal of Knowledge* 

Langton, N & Robbins, S. (2006). Organizational Behaviour (Fourth Canadian Edition).

Lee, H. and Choi, B., Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational

P. Barthelmess and K.M. Anderson University of Colorado at Boulder A View of Software

Sornlertlamvanich, V. (n.d.). 2 : Knowledge Management Systems Life Cycle. Knowledge

Stahl, G. (2006), Group cognition: Computer Support for Building Collaborative Knowledge,

Straker, D. (2009). How Knowledge Management Systems Fail and Succeed. *syque.com*.

Szulanski, G. (1996) 'Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best

Terra, J.C. & Gordon, C. (2002) Realizing the promise of corporate portals: Leveraging

knowledge for business success, Boston: Butterworth Heinemann

Practice within Firms', Strategic Management Journal, vol. 17, Special Issue Winter,

Zullighoven, R. Budde, and R. Keil-Slawik (eds.): Software Development and

Engineering Knowledge, A. Aurum, R. Jeffery, C. Wohlin, and M. Handzic, Eds.,

Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical Examination, Journal of Management Information Systems, Volume 20, Number 1, 2003, pp. 179 – 228. Nardi, B., Ed. Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer

Management', Guest editorial, Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 2, no. 3-4, pp.

but rather elicitation of requirements required as building blocks to build a KMS.

Communications of the ACM, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 59-64.

Reality Construction. Springer-Verlag, Chapt. 3.2.

what they Know, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

Hurley.L (2010) Reasons knowledge management information systems fail (n.d.).

*Management*, *5*(1), 43-59. doi:10.1108 or 13673270110384392

Valley. Oxford, Chandos Publishing.

Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2003, pp. 5-27.

Toronto, Ontario: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Interaction.Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1996.

Development Environments Based on Activity Theory

vol. 19(3), 2002, pp. 26-38.

Management.

Syque.

pp. 27-44.

MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
