**3. Methodology**

The methodology focuses on benchmarking between how impairments in Humans, weapons systems, gaming (wargaming) systems are modeled using exercises. A wellexecuted and designed C3W) exercises ( Fig 1) are the most effective way to:

 Validation and testing of a range of entities and events (e.g. plans, procedures, training, agreements)

Clarifying roles and responsibilities

248 Semantics – Advances in Theories and Mathematical Models

adaptive and assimilation the users preferences for how the presentation of KILDEE's is undertaken. What may exist are Human—machine interfaces information and knowledge critical path for Kernel (e.g. biological and non-biological) with a number of Rubik–

The associated firmware changes might in turn be required to be enabled in the WOSSI mapping systems that essentially allows wisdom to be identified from the lower order delivery engines information, knowledge, reasoning and understanding. This is suggested to be undertaken in an open–system (may be additionally known as open–source) to allow C3W for self correction. C3W Kernel self correction might be useful for Biorheology

Fiscal responsibility has recently been highlighted as an issue for general management that flows onto IT projects. These projects may have complex interconnecting engagement

Such a view is not uncommon of Cost benefit Analysis (CBA): "One of the problems of CBA is that the computation of many components of benefits and costs is intuitively obvious but that there are others for which intuition fails to suggest methods of measurement" [1].

Problems associated with ranking projects tend to involve complexities with determining value for tangible and intangibles. A simplification is required for IT projects to drive clarity of how to achieve efficiency outcomes as traditional Benefit to cost ratio (BCR) has

The problem addressed by moving to 'Wisdom open–system semantic identification (WOSSI) mapping, is therefore to simplify the outcome of leveraging evolutionary jump in the way to control and management the systems of gates as entities, events and interaction change. To move one needs not to be stuck in the conceptual phase of design with complex digital circuit mathematic and logic Truth tables. Secondly, WOSSI uses cognitive bases with hybrid semantics to facilitate moving from the macro, meso, micro, and quantum–nano

Problems that need to be addressed in the context of impairments in Humans, weapons,

The methodology focuses on benchmarking between how impairments in Humans, weapons systems, gaming (wargaming) systems are modeled using exercises. A well-

Validation and testing of a range of entities and events (e.g. plans, procedures, training,

 Enhancements via entangled single–to–multiple chain delivery engines Interoperability communication–companion Human—machines

executed and designed C3W) exercises ( Fig 1) are the most effective way to:

Schlangen type three–dimensional system and wisdom–based delivery engines.

interfaces to help overcome impairments in Humans, weapons systems, wargaming.

threads and stakeholder partnerships for a given business operation space.

shortcoming for a given scenario—context.

scales with minimal support conjectures [9].

Human impairments overcome/minimised

Low rejection rates of host Bio material.

**3. Methodology** 

agreements)

gaming (wargaming) systems tends to be the following:

Biorheology interfaces for Human—machine interfaces


Fig. 1. Cycle of planning training, exercises, and improvement actions (NCHRP, 2006)

The basic conceptualization seems to have a relationship with traditional 'strategic management planning (SMP) systems and processes (Fig 2). The journey commences with a continnum:


C3

expressions?

different scales

**4. Theory** 

W semantic Temporal Entanglement Modelling for Human - Machine Interfaces 251

Who is the driver of Semantics and Semiotic decision models, mapping and

 Why develop drivers to data interchange (EDI) and data cube aggregation for interfaces to help overcome impairments in Humans, weapons, Gaming (wargaming) systems?

Practical application examples to personalise the learning outcomes and the achieved

Once testing has been undertaken an analysis to validate if say Semantic and Semiotic based

Where are the levels of Semantic and Semiotic packet distortion and random radicals at

Why use Constructs and domains for interfaces to help overcome impairments in

The basis of the methodology is to drive a paradigm shift *via a cognitive* Semantic and Semiotic interface mapping approach and strategic management planning (SMP) is a 'tool

Coalescence Theory based Semantic mapping has two principle conceptualisations, that is, 'Wisdom open–system semantic identification' (WOSSI) and the existence of 'Causality

Human—machine interfaces could tend to be COR gates meshed and reflected within cognitive processes that semantic—semiotic mapping assists with. Current methods have extensive notations and mathematical fractals that make it difficulty for tech managers to understand the outcomes to be met and then develop the metrics to assist in monitoring.

As a stakeholders and partners the owner—funder—managers with the developer must have clarity and a common purpose. That is, the traditionally C3 (say C3T) has been 'Command—communication—control' but does not fit the current realities of 'Command causalities—consequences' (C3N) required for transparency, clarity of purpose and having

WOSSI based on Coalescence Theory may have application to rheology of entangled, single and multiple chains to suggest biorheology logic gates - Coalescence Theory (CT) application to rheology of entangled, of single and multiple chains suggests the existence of biorheology logic gates using CT developed at the University of Tasmania. Using CT may

Who undertakes Semantics and Theory of Conversation (ToC) and its nexus

kit' help overcome impairments in Humans, weapons systems, wargaming.

Logic gates' (COR gates) for use of Human—machine interfaces (Ronczka, 2006).

processes that met the required corporate governance (Ronczka [2], 2006).

Where are highlighted the interconnected nodes and threads?

information system is plausible initially using Ackoff system of filters:

What are the relationships to an information interface packet?

The third I likely to involve testing using Causality:

How does a process undertake Semantic test?

 How does a process undertake Semiotics test? When should base information be used?

Humans, weapons systems, wargaming?

competencies of participants.

Context of 'Internet Technologies and Applications'

Fig. 2. How strategic management process outcomes drive domain groupings (Hawkins, 1993; Raimond & Eden, 1990; Camillus & Datta, 1991; David, 2002; CSMINTL, 2002; McNeilly, 2002; Goold & Campbell , 2002; Miller et al., 1996). Legend: Critical Success Areas = CSAs; Critical performance indicators = CPIs; Key result areas = KRA; Key performance areas = KPAs; Key performance indicators = KPIs.

The second part of the journey involves distilling the critical Theme (Conjecture) questions initially using Ackoff system of filters1::


 1 Ackoff system of filters: information ('who', 'what', 'where', and 'when'); knowledge (application of 'how'); understanding (appreciation of 'why') and wisdom (evaluated 'why' [e–Why]) continnum (Hobbs, 2005; Bellinger, 2004; Ackoff, 1962; Wikipedia, 2009).


The third I likely to involve testing using Causality:


Once testing has been undertaken an analysis to validate if say Semantic and Semiotic based information system is plausible initially using Ackoff system of filters:


The basis of the methodology is to drive a paradigm shift *via a cognitive* Semantic and Semiotic interface mapping approach and strategic management planning (SMP) is a 'tool kit' help overcome impairments in Humans, weapons systems, wargaming.
