**24. Conclusion**

274 Semantics – Advances in Theories and Mathematical Models

Logic gate and WOSSI mapping has a predisposition to be semantics by nature and therefore tends to be a biological–cognitive–human–machine process. As such, the associated mechanisms and tools perhaps could be influence by the 'de Montaigne' paradox, and causality—consequence creep. Traditional Logic gates are the building blocks to digital logic circuits via combinational logic that provides the foundations to move to B*–*COR gates. This has therefore required the need to draw from the solid foundations provided by traditional mono gate concepts such as NOT gates (or inverters), AND gates, OR gates,

Plausible B*–*COR gates may be based on KILDEE's that have a common entangled–single– multiple chain themes such as *'any–place–any–time–any–way' 'Command—communication control' of 'multiple—multiplexing—machines' (C3M3).* Pushing the conceptualisation further, B–COR gates possibly will exist in multiple dimensions with temporal *KILDEE's e.g. return to its starting point having traversed both sides of the strip, without ever crossing an edge of any dimensional state [all possible states]- n greater than 3 called hyperspaces hypercube/Hyperspheremoves between and within itself].* There could be biological-cognitive predisposition to the way information and knowledge may be used between human—machine partnerships with

A 'tool kit' is able to be suggested to technology managers that is cognitively driven and not filled with complex data manipulations. As such the IT managers have a KISS 'tool kit' with

By focusing on required capability and reward required for effort a technologist or manager might use the 'Bonus' entity in the continuum (Plausible C3 Semantics-dynamics). Both the manager and the technologist practitioner are able to find a commonality by starting and

Another example might be if manager viewed 'Obligations' within the business management cycle to be part of a continuous improvement initiative. By having an understanding of the critical path memory highlighted within the continuum then drivers of the technology practitioner bonus may be proposed with various risk profiles and program logic relationships. The practitioner would be aware of the likely causality. Both parties would then determine their 'Willingness–to–pay' and 'Willingness–to––benefit' which is a

The next step in the 'tool kit' is to have a KISS mechanism that qualifies the many interlaced tangible and intangibles. A plausible A3 – Stakeholders-partnership using SMP as a 'back or

What is provided is a semantic—cognitive mechanism. A critical path memory exists and can lead to strengthening efficiency outcomes. The system of Ackoff threads through to packets of C3 have a quantifiable 'delivery engine domains' within a semantic modeling—

portability and adaptability to meet the various management and leaning styles.

finishing at any event or entity within or external to the continuum.

NAND gates, NOR gates, XOR gates, and XNOR gates (Lin, 2003; Als, 1999).

**23. Discussion** 

enhanced biological entities?

**23.1 Semantics-dynamics** 

form of ROI to participant.

**23.2 Stakeholders-partnership** 

envelope' calculation is suggested.

dynamics that works as a continuum.

The owner—funder—managers may now identify the semantic causalities—consequences that could have been hidden in the traditional complex mathematics approach. A critical path memory within the C3 *semantic modeling*—*dynamics* continuum (SMDC) is clearly seen. This allows owner—funder—managers to effective manage and to then bring technology project and capability under the financial limits. Secondly C3 SMDC could have a critical path memory to aid connectivity and engagement for a given scenario—context of all stakeholders. Lastly but not least, the technologist can identify the projects that attract the greatest bonus for their efforts and skill sets.
