**Assessment of Diversity in Grapevine Gene Pools from Romania and Republic of Moldova, Based on SSR Markers Analysis**

Ligia Gabriela Gheţea et al.\* *University of Bucharest, Faculty of Biology, Bucharest, Romania* 

#### **1. Introduction**

In the last 15 years, inventory of the genetic diversity for agricultural purposes and environmental protection has become a constant preocupation of European Union in the biological research field.

Due to the economical importance of *Vitis vinifera* species, and to the long viticulture tradition of many countries, the European Union has developed international projects having as main objective improving the knowledge, conservation and sustainable use of *Vitis* genetic resources in Europe.

One of the first such initiatives was GENRES CT96 081 (European Network for Grapevine Genetic Resources Conservation and Characterization) project (started in March 1997, ended in February 2002), aiming to establish the European *Vitis* Database, with free access via Internet, in order to enhance the utilization of relevant and highly valuable germplasm in breeding. The *Vitis* Working Group which has been constituted at the end of the GENRES project, decided to start the establishment of an SSR-marker database as part of the European *Vitis* database (www.ecpgr.cgiar.org/workgroups/vitis/).

Another international project, financially supported by the Government of Luxembourg and coordinated by Biodiversity International, named *"Conservation and sustainable use of grapevine germplasm in Caucasus and Northern Black See region",* was developed during the years 2003-2008, having as main result a better conservation of germplasm collections in this region (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova, Russian Federation and Ukraine) which represent a very unique and rich source of grapevine genetic variation.

<sup>\*</sup>Rozalia Magda Motoc1, Carmen Florentina Popescu2, Nicolae Barbacar3, Ligia Elena Bărbării4, Carmen Monica Constantinescu4, Daniela Iancu4, Tatiana Bătrînu3, Ina Bivol3, Ioan Baca3 and Gheorghe Savin5

*<sup>1</sup>University of Bucharest, Faculty of Biology, Bucharest, Romania* 

*<sup>2</sup>National Institute of Research & Development for Biotechnologies in Horticulture, Ştefăneşti-Argeş, Romania 3Genetics and Plant Physiology Institute of the Moldavian Academy of Sciences, Chişinău, Republic of Moldova 4National Institute of Legal Medicine "Mina Minovici", Bucharest, Romania*

*<sup>5</sup>National Institute for Viticulture and Oenology, Department of Grapevine Genetic Resources, Chişinău, Republic of Moldova*

Assessment of Diversity in Grapevine Gene Pools

ten microsatellite loci.

Chişinău.

two stock collections.

following objectives:

producing and conservation;

others are in course to be published.

from Romania and Republic of Moldova, Based on SSR Markers Analysis 45

origin and ecological aspects (genetic diversity); (iii) the distinctness between cultivars, uniformity of planting material belonging to the same genotype, and genetic stability of all

The *Vitis* Working Group highly recommended to include in each SSR-marker genotyping in grapevine cultivars, six microsatellite loci which proved to have a high variability among different cultivars, making possible a good discrimination even between very close related ones. These SSR markers are: VrZAG62, VrZAG79, VVS2, and VVMD5, VVMD7, VVMD27. In our researches, we obtained good results with five of these SSR markers, along with other

From our work during the 7 past years, on grapevine cultivars genotyping based on SSR markers, for this book chapter we have made a selection of the most interesting results, to be presented. Some of these results have already been published (Gheţea et al., 2010, a; b), some

The grapevine cultivars considered for the study are among the most economically important, and encountered in the vineyards, in the two countries. The Romanian grapevine cultivars are included in the Official Catalogue of Cultivated Plants from Romania, and are maintained in the stock collection of the National Institute for Research and Development for Biotechnologies in Horticulture (NIRDBH), Ştefăneşti-Argeş. The Moldavian grapevine cultivars are in the stock collection of the National Institute for Viticulture and Oenology,

In this paper, we present our results on 14 grapevine cultivars, 7 cultivars from each of the

Although, in Romania, vineyards produce grapes of unsurpassed quantity and quality with autochthonous genotypes, these cultivars are known and appreciated only in few regions. Also, the new breeders' creations are planted only in local areas and are commercialized mostly on national market. As Romanian grapevine cultivars were not studied from the genetic point of view, very limited information is available about their origin and gene pool value. Such genetic data regarding both the ancient and new creations of grapevine varieties from Romania become essential for recognition and registration in the International Grapevine Genome database. Moreover, this must be the main reason to promote a sustained research activity for a complete evaluation of Romanian grapevine genetic resources. So, the first step was to establish a core colection and a research program with the

a. to verify the genetic identity of the cultivars, their stability and integrity during

b. to identify duplicates in the grapevine collection, to eliminate them from the collection

c. to prove the distinctness of the ancient and new grapevine varieties, important

requirement for characterization and registration of Romanian germplasm.

**3.1 The grapevine cultivars from Romanian stock collection** 

and to guaranty the authenticity of the planting material;

**3. The grapevine cultivars for which genetic profiles have been obtained** 

morphological-physiological features and yield capacities of each cultivar.

Starting from 2010, a third important European project is in course (ending in 2014): the COST project named *"East-West collaboration for grapevine diversity exploration and mobilization of adaptive traits for breeding".* In this project are involved 35 member states countries (Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom, Serbia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia), one cooperating state Israel, and also reciprocal agreements with Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and Argentina. The main objective is to create a knowledge platform about European grapevine germplasm, essential for (1) the maintenance of genetic resources, (2) the discrimination and identification of grapevine varieties and (3) the availability and exchange of germplasm. These grapevine collections gathering autochthonous and unique varieties with valuable genetic- and phenotypical traits, are also essential for longterm conservation and sustainable use of this economically important species.

Romania and Republic of Moldova have a multimillenary tradition in grapevine cultivation and wine production. Thus, both ancient- and newly created grapevine varieties from these two countries are valuable gene resources which must be inventored for a complete genetic characterization, based on reliable molecular markers.

As a response to the European Union initiative for inventory and conservation of grapevine genetic resources, two research teams from Romania and Republic of Moldova have initiated a research direction aiming to establish a genetic profile – based on SSR markers analysis - for the grapevine varieties cultivated in these two countries, in order to make an inventory of them, and also to facilitate the registration of Romanian- and Moldavian originated cultivars in the European *Vitis* Database. These specific genetic profiles represent also a real passport that certifies their authenticity and represents a guarantee for further preservation of grapevine cultivars with economic value.

#### **2. SSR markers for designing the genetic profile of grapevine cultivars**

SSR (*s*imple *s*equence *r*epeats, or microsatellites) are arrays of short motifs, highly repeated, of 1 to 6 base pairs. These locus specific markers are characterized by hypervariability, abundance, high reproducibility, Mendelian inheritance and codominant nature. They are not affected by environmental factors such as soil, climate, cultivation methods or diseases (Scott et al., 2000; Meredith, 2001).

Therefore, microsatellites are the favourite type of DNA markers used to characterized the grapevine cultivars, their properties enabling a wide range of applications: cultivar identification and discrimination, parentage testing and pedigree reconstruction, genetic stability of all morphological-physiological features, yield capacities of each cultivar, management of germplasm collection (Thomas & Scott, 1993; Bowers et al., 1996; Thomas et al. 1998; Bowers et al., 1999; Sefc et al., 1999; Sefc et al., 2000; Sefc et al., 2001). Their relative abundance within the genome and being very easy to be detected by PCR reaction explain that at present, more than 600 grapevine microsatellite markers are available (Moncada et al., 2006), making possible refined genetic profiles of different varieties.

Analysis of microsatellite loci in different cultivars (genotypes) provides useful information about: (i) genetic data for each conserved genotype; (ii) taxonomy relatedness, geographic

Starting from 2010, a third important European project is in course (ending in 2014): the COST project named *"East-West collaboration for grapevine diversity exploration and mobilization of adaptive traits for breeding".* In this project are involved 35 member states countries (Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom, Serbia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia), one cooperating state Israel, and also reciprocal agreements with Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and Argentina. The main objective is to create a knowledge platform about European grapevine germplasm, essential for (1) the maintenance of genetic resources, (2) the discrimination and identification of grapevine varieties and (3) the availability and exchange of germplasm. These grapevine collections gathering autochthonous and unique varieties with valuable genetic- and phenotypical traits, are also essential for long-

Romania and Republic of Moldova have a multimillenary tradition in grapevine cultivation and wine production. Thus, both ancient- and newly created grapevine varieties from these two countries are valuable gene resources which must be inventored for a complete genetic

As a response to the European Union initiative for inventory and conservation of grapevine genetic resources, two research teams from Romania and Republic of Moldova have initiated a research direction aiming to establish a genetic profile – based on SSR markers analysis - for the grapevine varieties cultivated in these two countries, in order to make an inventory of them, and also to facilitate the registration of Romanian- and Moldavian originated cultivars in the European *Vitis* Database. These specific genetic profiles represent also a real passport that certifies their authenticity and represents a guarantee for further

**2. SSR markers for designing the genetic profile of grapevine cultivars** 

al., 2006), making possible refined genetic profiles of different varieties.

SSR (*s*imple *s*equence *r*epeats, or microsatellites) are arrays of short motifs, highly repeated, of 1 to 6 base pairs. These locus specific markers are characterized by hypervariability, abundance, high reproducibility, Mendelian inheritance and codominant nature. They are not affected by environmental factors such as soil, climate, cultivation methods or diseases

Therefore, microsatellites are the favourite type of DNA markers used to characterized the grapevine cultivars, their properties enabling a wide range of applications: cultivar identification and discrimination, parentage testing and pedigree reconstruction, genetic stability of all morphological-physiological features, yield capacities of each cultivar, management of germplasm collection (Thomas & Scott, 1993; Bowers et al., 1996; Thomas et al. 1998; Bowers et al., 1999; Sefc et al., 1999; Sefc et al., 2000; Sefc et al., 2001). Their relative abundance within the genome and being very easy to be detected by PCR reaction explain that at present, more than 600 grapevine microsatellite markers are available (Moncada et

Analysis of microsatellite loci in different cultivars (genotypes) provides useful information about: (i) genetic data for each conserved genotype; (ii) taxonomy relatedness, geographic

term conservation and sustainable use of this economically important species.

characterization, based on reliable molecular markers.

preservation of grapevine cultivars with economic value.

(Scott et al., 2000; Meredith, 2001).

origin and ecological aspects (genetic diversity); (iii) the distinctness between cultivars, uniformity of planting material belonging to the same genotype, and genetic stability of all morphological-physiological features and yield capacities of each cultivar.

The *Vitis* Working Group highly recommended to include in each SSR-marker genotyping in grapevine cultivars, six microsatellite loci which proved to have a high variability among different cultivars, making possible a good discrimination even between very close related ones. These SSR markers are: VrZAG62, VrZAG79, VVS2, and VVMD5, VVMD7, VVMD27. In our researches, we obtained good results with five of these SSR markers, along with other ten microsatellite loci.

From our work during the 7 past years, on grapevine cultivars genotyping based on SSR markers, for this book chapter we have made a selection of the most interesting results, to be presented. Some of these results have already been published (Gheţea et al., 2010, a; b), some others are in course to be published.

#### **3. The grapevine cultivars for which genetic profiles have been obtained**

The grapevine cultivars considered for the study are among the most economically important, and encountered in the vineyards, in the two countries. The Romanian grapevine cultivars are included in the Official Catalogue of Cultivated Plants from Romania, and are maintained in the stock collection of the National Institute for Research and Development for Biotechnologies in Horticulture (NIRDBH), Ştefăneşti-Argeş. The Moldavian grapevine cultivars are in the stock collection of the National Institute for Viticulture and Oenology, Chişinău.

In this paper, we present our results on 14 grapevine cultivars, 7 cultivars from each of the two stock collections.

#### **3.1 The grapevine cultivars from Romanian stock collection**

Although, in Romania, vineyards produce grapes of unsurpassed quantity and quality with autochthonous genotypes, these cultivars are known and appreciated only in few regions. Also, the new breeders' creations are planted only in local areas and are commercialized mostly on national market. As Romanian grapevine cultivars were not studied from the genetic point of view, very limited information is available about their origin and gene pool value. Such genetic data regarding both the ancient and new creations of grapevine varieties from Romania become essential for recognition and registration in the International Grapevine Genome database. Moreover, this must be the main reason to promote a sustained research activity for a complete evaluation of Romanian grapevine genetic resources. So, the first step was to establish a core colection and a research program with the following objectives:


Assessment of Diversity in Grapevine Gene Pools

**4. Methodology** 

Biosystems, USA.

of 25l).

from Romania and Republic of Moldova, Based on SSR Markers Analysis 47

DNA was extracted from young leaves of different grapevine genotypes, according to the method reported by Vallejos et al. (1992). For genotyping the selected cultivars, primer pairs for 15 microsatellite loci were chosen, 5 of which being recommended as reference SSR

The forward primer of each pair has been marked with one of the four fluorochromes: 6- FAM, NED, VIC or PET. The liophylised primers have been obtained from Applied

For the amplification reaction, a thermocycler (Bio-Rad) with Peltier system was used. Optimal primer annealing temperature, presented in Table 1, was chosen for each primer

The PCR mix have had the following composition: 5X Colorless GoTaq® Flexi Buffer (Promega) – 5l; MgCl2 – 0,75l; dNTP mix, 10mM (Promega) – 0,5l; primer 1 – 1l; primer 2 – 1l; DNA sample – 30-45 ng/l; GoTaq® DNA Polymerase (Promega) – 0,25l; ddH2O – X l (X was calculated for each sample, depending on the volume of DNA sample, to a final volume

The PCR reactions were performed on an GeneAmp PCR System 9700 thermocycler (Applied Biosystems), using for the annealing step, the optimal temperature established for

Primer

(R) aacagcatgacatccacctcaacgg

(R) aaatcctcggtctctagccaaaagg

(R) atctcaagctgggctgtattacaat

(R) ccatgtctctcctcagcttctcagc

(R) tgcccccattttcaaactcccttcc

(R) cttctcaatgatatctaaaaccatg

(R) aaattcaaaattctaattcaactgg

(R) cccaccttgcccttagatgtta

(R) ctgtctaagacgaagaaga

(R) cgaaccttcacacgcttgat

(R) ttgttacccaaacacttcactaatgc

Sequence T °annealing

56°C

51°C

54°C

54°C

54°C

54°C

54°C

56°C

52°C

54°C

54°C

markers by the *Vitis* Working Group (www.ecpgr.cgiar.org/workgroups/vitis/).

pair, according to the results obtained in the temperature gradient PCR.

each primer pair (510C, 520C, 540C or 560C) (see Table 1).

cited in the literature

ssrVrZAG71 106 – 158 (F) gtggtagtgggtgtgaacggagtgg

ssrVrZAG121 140 – 172 (F) ctgcaaataaatattaaaaaattcg

ssrVrZAG151 163 – 193 (F) ggattttggctgtagttttgtgaag

ssrVrZAG621 185 – 203 (F) ggtgaaatgggcaccgaacacacgc

ssrVrZAG791 236 – 260 (F) agattgtggaggagggaacaaaccg

VVS12 160 – 205 (F) acaattggaaaccgcgcgtggag

VVS42 167 – 187 (F) ccatcagtgataaaacctaatgcc

VVS22 129 – 155 (F) cagcccgtaaatgtatccatc

VVMD63 194 – 214 (F) atctctaaccctaaaaccat

VVMD73 233 – 263 (F) agagttgcggagaacaggat

VVMD143 222 – 250 (F) catgaaaaaatcaacataaaagggc

Locus Allele size range (bp)

d. Expectations as results from these activities are: a) a complete view of the Romanian grapevine gene resources; b) improve knowledge of the patent of distribution of grapevine genetic diversity; c) the genetic characterization of the Romanian cultivars would be equally very useful for all research units, for the owners of genotypes, for the grapevine growers and wine makers.

The cultivars we are presenting are as follows: (Dobrei et al., 2005):


#### **3.2 The grapevine cultivars from Moldavian stock collection**

A constant preoccupation in Moldavian breeding programs in viticulture, during the last 40 years, was obtaining valuable grapevine varieties, including large bunches and berries, early maturation of fruits, high accumulation of sugar, seedless berries, resistance of unfavourable environmental factors (drought, harsh winter conditions, diseases and pests) (Savin et al., 2010).

The cultivars we are discussing here are as follows:


### **4. Methodology**

46 Horticulture

d. Expectations as results from these activities are: a) a complete view of the Romanian grapevine gene resources; b) improve knowledge of the patent of distribution of grapevine genetic diversity; c) the genetic characterization of the Romanian cultivars would be equally very useful for all research units, for the owners of genotypes, for the

1. **Italian Riesling** – opinions concerning its origin are different: German from Rhine

2. **Sauvignon** – French origin; with large areas cultivation; extensively cultivated in

3. **Cabernet Sauvignon** – French origin, old cultivar obtained in Bordeaux region, by crossbreeding between *Cabernet Franc* and *Sauvignon Blanc*; high geographical dispersion. 4. **Tămâioasă Românească** – uncertain origin; very old cultivar, known in ancient Greece as "Anathelion moschaton", and also during in Roman Empire, as "Aspinae"; cultivated in Romanian vineyards from ancient times, it is considered as autochthonous

5. **Fetească neagră** – ancient Romanian cultivar, obtained by empirical selection from *Vitis* 

6. **Fetească albă** – considered as autochthonous cultivar, obtained by empirical selection,

7. **Fetească regală** – Romanian origin cultivar, it is supposed to be result of a natural hybridization obtained by cross-breeding between two autochthonous cultivars:

A constant preoccupation in Moldavian breeding programs in viticulture, during the last 40 years, was obtaining valuable grapevine varieties, including large bunches and berries, early maturation of fruits, high accumulation of sugar, seedless berries, resistance of unfavourable environmental factors (drought, harsh winter conditions, diseases and pests) (Savin et al.,

3. **Fetească albă** – Romanian origin; extensively cultivated in Moldavian vineyards (see

5. **Muscat timpuriu de Bucureşti** – table grapes with early ripening, Romanian origin; obtained by cross-breeding between Romanian cultivars *Coarnă albă* and *Regina Viilor*. 6. **Timpuriu de Cluj** – table grapes, Romanian origin; obtained by cross-breeding between

7. **Apiren extratimpuriu** – seedless cultivar obtained at National Institute for Viticulture and Oenology, Chişinău, by cross-breeding between *Urojainyi* and *Kismis turkmenski* cultivars; valuable for early ripening, high fertility and resistance to harsh winter

from *Fetească neagră* cultivar; extensively cultivated in Romanian vineyards.

grapevine growers and wine makers.

*Fetească albă* and *Grasă de Cotnari*.

The cultivars we are discussing here are as follows:

2. **Fetească neagră** – Romanian origin (see above).

4. **Fetească regală** – Romanian origin (see previous section).

two Romanian cultivars: *Crâmpoşie* and *Frumoasă de Ghioroc*.

previous section).

conditions.

Bordeaux region.

cultivar.

2010).

The cultivars we are presenting are as follows: (Dobrei et al., 2005):

Valley, or Austrian from Styria region, or Italian origin.

*sylvestris* Gmel; originated on the Prut river, in Iasi region.

**3.2 The grapevine cultivars from Moldavian stock collection** 

1. **Cabernet Sauvignon** – its origin is mentioned above (at 3.1. section).

DNA was extracted from young leaves of different grapevine genotypes, according to the method reported by Vallejos et al. (1992). For genotyping the selected cultivars, primer pairs for 15 microsatellite loci were chosen, 5 of which being recommended as reference SSR markers by the *Vitis* Working Group (www.ecpgr.cgiar.org/workgroups/vitis/).

The forward primer of each pair has been marked with one of the four fluorochromes: 6- FAM, NED, VIC or PET. The liophylised primers have been obtained from Applied Biosystems, USA.

For the amplification reaction, a thermocycler (Bio-Rad) with Peltier system was used. Optimal primer annealing temperature, presented in Table 1, was chosen for each primer pair, according to the results obtained in the temperature gradient PCR.

The PCR mix have had the following composition: 5X Colorless GoTaq® Flexi Buffer (Promega) – 5l; MgCl2 – 0,75l; dNTP mix, 10mM (Promega) – 0,5l; primer 1 – 1l; primer 2 – 1l; DNA sample – 30-45 ng/l; GoTaq® DNA Polymerase (Promega) – 0,25l; ddH2O – X l (X was calculated for each sample, depending on the volume of DNA sample, to a final volume of 25l).

The PCR reactions were performed on an GeneAmp PCR System 9700 thermocycler (Applied Biosystems), using for the annealing step, the optimal temperature established for each primer pair (510C, 520C, 540C or 560C) (see Table 1).


Assessment of Diversity in Grapevine Gene Pools

al., 2006).

**A** 

**B** 

**C** 

**D**

from Romania and Republic of Moldova, Based on SSR Markers Analysis 49

*de Cluj*), 2 significantly shorter allelic variants (of 102/103, and 107 bp) have been observed. The 102/103 variant is outside the known allelic size range (Table 2 and Table 3). The high degree of homozygocity showed at this SSR locus is an indication that it could be associated with a coding region where genes for economically important traits are located (Oliveira et

Fig. 1. Gene Mapper image for *Tămâioasă Românească* (A)*, Fetească albă* (B), *Cabernet Sauvignon*  (C) and *Fetească regală* (D) cultivars, at the VVMD27 microsatellite region. A heterozygotic condition appears for the first three cultivars, with significant diference (in base pair number) between the two allelic variants, while the fourth one is homozygous at this locus.

For the **VrZAG12** region, most of the analysed cultivars showed a homozygotic status. Only *Cabernet Sauvignon* and *Apiren extratimpuriu* from Republic of Moldova stock collection, and *Italian Riesling* from Romanian stock collection, are heterozygous. Significant differences appear in the same cultivar comming from different stock collections: *Fetească albă* Romania (R) – 150:150/Republic of Moldova (M) – 165:165; *Fetească regală* (R) – 170:170/(M) – 153:153; *Fetească neagră* (R) – 148:148/(M) – 166:166 (Table 2 and Table 3). One can conclude that this microsatellite locus could be placed in a coding region linked with genes for valuable traits. Although, a molecular mechanism (probably, during DNA replication) acting differently in the two gene pools (Romanian and/or Moldavian), by adding or remove a number of base pairs, created, in time, different allelic variants stabilized, at first, by self-pollination and later, by repeated artificial selection and vegetative multiplication. The most frequent allele at this SSR locus has 147/148bp, and is encountered in a homozygotic- or heterozygotic status, also in Romanian and Moldavian collection (Table 4 and Table 5). All the allelic variants we have found are within the allele size interval cited in the literature (Table 1).


([1] Sefc et al., 1999; Nuclear SSR primers of the Centre for Applied Genetics, University of Agriculture, Vienna, Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria)

([2] Thomas & Scott, 1993; Thomas et al., 1998; Nuclear SSR primers of the Division of Horticulture CSIRO, Adelaide, Australia)

([3] Bowers et al.,1996; Bowers et al.,1999; Nuclear SSR primers of the Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, USA)

Table 1. List of the analysed SSR loci

The PCR reaction steps were:


720C → 1 minute III - 720C → 7 minutes (final elongation step)

The efficiency of the amplification reaction was analysed in a 2% agarose gel, in TAE buffer, according to Ausubel et al. (1990). A 5g/ml ethidium bromide solution was used for the analysis of amplicon bands in UV light.

The amplicon genotyping was performed at an ABI PRISM 3100 Genetic Analyzer, using ROX 500 as internal standard. The samples were analysed with the GeneMapper program.

#### **5. Results and discussions**

Genotyping method allowed us to determine the base pair number in each amplicon obtained for the 15 microsatellite loci. Different cultivars showed, at a certain SSR locus, a homozygotic (the presence of a single allelic variant), or a heterozygotic (two, and in some cases, even 3 allelic variants) condition (see Table 2 and Table 3).

In figure 1, an electropherogram obtained using the GeneMapper, on ABI PRISM 3100 Genetic Analyser, is presented (Gheţea et al., 2010, a).

Based on amplicon dimensions corresponding to the 15 SSR markers, a genetic profile was obtained for each of the analysed cultivars.

The **VrZAG7** locus showed a homozygous condition in all cultivars we have analysed. The allelic variants having the highest frequency in Romanian cultivars are those of 155bp and 157 base pairs (bp) (approximately 43%), while in the Moldavian ones, the most frequent (approximately 29%) is of 156bp (Table 4 and Table 5). Most of the detected alleles are within the size interval cited in the literature (see Table 1 for allelic size range); in 3 Moldavian provenience cultivars (*Fetească regală, Muscat Timpuriu de Bucureşti* and *Timpuriu* 

([1] Sefc et al., 1999; Nuclear SSR primers of the Centre for Applied Genetics, University of Agriculture,

([2] Thomas & Scott, 1993; Thomas et al., 1998; Nuclear SSR primers of the Division of Horticulture

([3] Bowers et al.,1996; Bowers et al.,1999; Nuclear SSR primers of the Department of Viticulture and

The efficiency of the amplification reaction was analysed in a 2% agarose gel, in TAE buffer, according to Ausubel et al. (1990). A 5g/ml ethidium bromide solution was used for the

The amplicon genotyping was performed at an ABI PRISM 3100 Genetic Analyzer, using ROX 500 as internal standard. The samples were analysed with the GeneMapper program.

Genotyping method allowed us to determine the base pair number in each amplicon obtained for the 15 microsatellite loci. Different cultivars showed, at a certain SSR locus, a homozygotic (the presence of a single allelic variant), or a heterozygotic (two, and in some

In figure 1, an electropherogram obtained using the GeneMapper, on ABI PRISM 3100

Based on amplicon dimensions corresponding to the 15 SSR markers, a genetic profile was

The **VrZAG7** locus showed a homozygous condition in all cultivars we have analysed. The allelic variants having the highest frequency in Romanian cultivars are those of 155bp and 157 base pairs (bp) (approximately 43%), while in the Moldavian ones, the most frequent (approximately 29%) is of 156bp (Table 4 and Table 5). Most of the detected alleles are within the size interval cited in the literature (see Table 1 for allelic size range); in 3 Moldavian provenience cultivars (*Fetească regală, Muscat Timpuriu de Bucureşti* and *Timpuriu* 

(R) cacacatatcatcaccacacgg

(R) gcttcagtaaaaagggattgcg

(R) acgggtatagagcaaacggtgt

(R) gcaactgtaaaggtaagacacagtcc

x 35 cycles

52°C

52°C

54°C

56°C

VVMD173 212 – 236 (F) tgactcgccaaaatctgacg

VVMD213 243 – 266 (F) ggttgtcttatggagttgatgttgc

VVMD273 173 – 194 (F) gtaccagatctgaatacatccgtaagt

VVMD363 244 – 315 (F) taaaataataatagggggacacggg

Vienna, Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria)

Enology, University of California, Davis, USA)

I - 950C → 4 minutes (initial denaturation step)

III - 720C → 7 minutes (final elongation step)

X0C (X=510C, 520C, 540C or 560C) → 1 minute

cases, even 3 allelic variants) condition (see Table 2 and Table 3).

Genetic Analyser, is presented (Gheţea et al., 2010, a).

obtained for each of the analysed cultivars.

Table 1. List of the analysed SSR loci

950C → 1 minute

720C → 1 minute

analysis of amplicon bands in UV light.

**5. Results and discussions** 

The PCR reaction steps were:

II -

CSIRO, Adelaide, Australia)

*de Cluj*), 2 significantly shorter allelic variants (of 102/103, and 107 bp) have been observed. The 102/103 variant is outside the known allelic size range (Table 2 and Table 3). The high degree of homozygocity showed at this SSR locus is an indication that it could be associated with a coding region where genes for economically important traits are located (Oliveira et al., 2006).

Fig. 1. Gene Mapper image for *Tămâioasă Românească* (A)*, Fetească albă* (B), *Cabernet Sauvignon*  (C) and *Fetească regală* (D) cultivars, at the VVMD27 microsatellite region. A heterozygotic condition appears for the first three cultivars, with significant diference (in base pair number) between the two allelic variants, while the fourth one is homozygous at this locus.

For the **VrZAG12** region, most of the analysed cultivars showed a homozygotic status. Only *Cabernet Sauvignon* and *Apiren extratimpuriu* from Republic of Moldova stock collection, and *Italian Riesling* from Romanian stock collection, are heterozygous. Significant differences appear in the same cultivar comming from different stock collections: *Fetească albă* Romania (R) – 150:150/Republic of Moldova (M) – 165:165; *Fetească regală* (R) – 170:170/(M) – 153:153; *Fetească neagră* (R) – 148:148/(M) – 166:166 (Table 2 and Table 3). One can conclude that this microsatellite locus could be placed in a coding region linked with genes for valuable traits. Although, a molecular mechanism (probably, during DNA replication) acting differently in the two gene pools (Romanian and/or Moldavian), by adding or remove a number of base pairs, created, in time, different allelic variants stabilized, at first, by self-pollination and later, by repeated artificial selection and vegetative multiplication. The most frequent allele at this SSR locus has 147/148bp, and is encountered in a homozygotic- or heterozygotic status, also in Romanian and Moldavian collection (Table 4 and Table 5). All the allelic variants we have found are within the allele size interval cited in the literature (Table 1).

Assessment of Diversity in Grapevine Gene Pools

164

155 148 164 <sup>190</sup>

155 150 164 <sup>188</sup>

**<sup>102</sup>**146 164 190 <sup>238</sup>

155 164 <sup>189</sup>

under the influence of local molecular mechanisms.

allelic size interval (Table 1).

<sup>157</sup><sup>147</sup> 140

<sup>158</sup><sup>147</sup>

*Italian Riesling R* 

*Sauvi gnon R* 

*Tămâioasă Româ nească R* 

*Muscat Timpuriu de Buc. M* 

*Timpuriu de Cluj M* 

*Apiren extratimpuriu M* 

**Cultivar Microsatellite loci ZAG7 ZAG12ZAG15ZAG62ZAG79VVS1VVS2VVS4VVMD**

198

**<sup>103</sup>**146 164 190 237 178 <sup>148</sup>

195

literature (see Table 1). Dashes – no amplicon has been obtained.

<sup>174</sup>198 **230** <sup>180</sup> <sup>130</sup>

<sup>196</sup>**235** <sup>178</sup> **<sup>128</sup>**

248

253

237

from Romania and Republic of Moldova, Based on SSR Markers Analysis 51

148

<sup>252</sup><sup>176</sup> **<sup>128</sup>** <sup>169</sup>

178 <sup>185</sup> <sup>141</sup> <sup>169</sup>

<sup>248</sup><sup>178</sup> <sup>139</sup>

Moldova. Bolded numbers – allelic variants shorter than the allele sizes cited in the

**6**

207

**191**  200

<sup>148</sup> <sup>168</sup> <sup>200</sup>

169 176

<sup>148</sup> <sup>176</sup> <sup>206</sup>

Table 3. Allelic size (number of base pairs) at 15 microsatellite loci, in 6 grapevine varieties cultivated in Romania or Republic of Moldova (see section 3.) *R* – Romania; *M* – Republic of

The **VrZAG 79** locus was identified on the linkage group corresponding to chromosome 5 of the *Vitis vinifera* complement (Riaz et al., 2004; Troggio et al., 2007; Vezzulli et al., 2008). Like VrZAG62 locus, this region has a high variability of the number of base pairs, generating many allelic variants: in these 14 cultivars, we have found 8 different alleles also in Romanian- and in Moldavian group; the most frequent allelic variant in Romanian cultivars has 246bp (approximately 25%), and in Moldavian ones – 235bp – (approximately 25%) (Table 4 and Table 5); 3 allele forms – those of 228bp, 230bp and 235bp – are outside the allelic size range known in the literature (they are slightly shorter). Interesting, the alleles of 228bp and 230bp have been found in 3 non-Romanian origin cultivars: *Cabernet Sauvignon* (228:247), *Italian Riesling* (230:230) and *Sauvignon* (235:235), existent in Romanian stock collection (Table 2 and Table 3). This aspect indicates that the 3 cultivars were imported in the Romanian grapevine gene pool a long time ago, suffering discrete genetic modifications,

For the **VVS1** microsatellite locus, homozygotic- and also heterozygotic cultivars have been found; the most frequent allelic variant was that of 178bp, in both Romanian and Moldavian group. The frequency of this allele in the 14 analysed cultivars is of 36% in Romanian group, and of 57% in Moldavian group (Table 4 and Table 5). At this locus, like in other SSR loci, some differences appear in the same cultivar provenant from different stock collections (Romanian / Moldavian): *Fetească albă* (R) – 178:183/(M) – 178:178; *Fetească regală* (R) – 177:177/(M) – 178:188; *Cabernet Sauvignon* (R) – 179:179/(M) – 170:178 (Table 2 and Table 3). All the allelic variants found in the 14 cultivars, are within the

212

**VVMD 7**

248

241

<sup>176</sup> 199 235 **216** 219 <sup>244</sup>

<sup>176</sup> 206 240 **217** 219 <sup>245</sup>

<sup>153</sup> 176 206 240 **217** 220 246 <sup>176</sup>

252 - <sup>218</sup>

220

240

**VVMD 14**

**VVMD 17**

258 **216** 219 243 <sup>182</sup>

258 **216** 220 <sup>246</sup>

**VVMD 21**

253

263

245 <sup>253</sup><sup>182</sup>

**VVMD 27** 

186

182 <sup>191</sup><sup>267</sup>

176 191

<sup>252</sup>178 259

<sup>182</sup><sup>260</sup>

**103 234 236**

**VVMD 36** 

> 249 259

**239**  259

The most frequent and well conserved allelic variant for the **VrZAG15** region, has 164 (163- 165) bp (Table 4 and Table 5), and appears in a homozygotic status in 9 cultivars, and in a heterozygotic status, in other 4 cultivars (Table 2 and Table 3).

The **VrZAG62** locus was recommended by the *Vitis* Working Group as SSR marker due to high allelic variability observed in grapevine cultivars of different gene pools, in different countries. This high degree of variability is confirmed also by our results: in these 14 cultivars we discuss here, 5 allelic variants have been found in Romanian cultivars (the most frequent variant, of 198bp, approximately 36%), and 7 different alleles in Moldavian cultivars (the most frequent variant, of 190bp, approximately 50%) (Table 4 and Table 5). They are also in a homozygotic- or heterozygotic status (Table 2 and Table 3). In other Moldavian cultivars, we have obtained, at this locus, even 3 or 4 different amplicons, corresponding to a triallelic- or a tetraallelic condition (article in course to be published). This is not a singular SSR locus where multiallelic condition has been encountered, and this particular feature will be discussed later. The cultivars *Fetească albă, Fetească regală* and *Cabernet Sauvignon* have different allelic constitutions, depending on the Romanian- or Moldavian stock collection origin. Two allelic variants, of 205 and 206bp (slightly longer than the size interval cited in the literature), have been found in Moldavian cultivars *Fetească albă* and *Cabernet Sauvignon*. The SSR locus VrZAG62 was identified on the linkage group corresponding to chromosome 7 of the *Vitis vinifera* complement (Riaz et al., 2004; Lowe & Walker, 2006; Troggio et al., 2007; Vezzulli et al., 2008), probably in an non-coding region, which explains its high mutational rate (Oliveira et al., 2006).


Table 2. Allelic size (number of base pairs) at 15 microsatellite loci, in 4 grapevine varieties cultivated also in Romania and Republic of Moldova (see section 3.). *R* – Romania; *M* – Republic of Moldova. Bolded numbers – allelic variants shorter than the allele sizes cited in the literature (see Table 1). Dashes – no amplicon has been obtained.

The most frequent and well conserved allelic variant for the **VrZAG15** region, has 164 (163- 165) bp (Table 4 and Table 5), and appears in a homozygotic status in 9 cultivars, and in a

The **VrZAG62** locus was recommended by the *Vitis* Working Group as SSR marker due to high allelic variability observed in grapevine cultivars of different gene pools, in different countries. This high degree of variability is confirmed also by our results: in these 14 cultivars we discuss here, 5 allelic variants have been found in Romanian cultivars (the most frequent variant, of 198bp, approximately 36%), and 7 different alleles in Moldavian cultivars (the most frequent variant, of 190bp, approximately 50%) (Table 4 and Table 5). They are also in a homozygotic- or heterozygotic status (Table 2 and Table 3). In other Moldavian cultivars, we have obtained, at this locus, even 3 or 4 different amplicons, corresponding to a triallelic- or a tetraallelic condition (article in course to be published). This is not a singular SSR locus where multiallelic condition has been encountered, and this particular feature will be discussed later. The cultivars *Fetească albă, Fetească regală* and *Cabernet Sauvignon* have different allelic constitutions, depending on the Romanian- or Moldavian stock collection origin. Two allelic variants, of 205 and 206bp (slightly longer than the size interval cited in the literature), have been found in Moldavian cultivars *Fetească albă* and *Cabernet Sauvignon*. The SSR locus VrZAG62 was identified on the linkage group corresponding to chromosome 7 of the *Vitis vinifera* complement (Riaz et al., 2004; Lowe & Walker, 2006; Troggio et al., 2007; Vezzulli et al., 2008), probably in an non-coding region,

**6**

207

207

197

<sup>177</sup> <sup>207</sup><sup>250</sup>

<sup>183</sup> **<sup>128</sup>** <sup>168</sup> <sup>200</sup>

<sup>148</sup> <sup>177</sup> <sup>198</sup>

<sup>186</sup> 139 167 **<sup>186</sup>**<sup>240</sup>

<sup>187</sup> **<sup>126</sup>** - <sup>200</sup>

169

<sup>141</sup> <sup>176</sup> **<sup>173</sup>**

**VVMD 7**

> 248 254

> 240

248

252

256

**<sup>187</sup>** <sup>244</sup>**<sup>218</sup>**

<sup>176</sup> 200 241 **<sup>218</sup>**

**VVMD 14**

> **216**  228

250 **216 <sup>209</sup>**

**219** 

**216**  228

228

207 240 236 220 - <sup>177</sup>

250 232 221 <sup>245</sup>

**VVMD 17**

**210** 

225 219 <sup>247</sup>

**210**  219

222 218 <sup>245</sup>

217 <sup>231</sup><sup>243</sup>

**VVMD 21**

219 244 <sup>182</sup>

**239**  244

255

**VVMD 27** 

191

255 179 **<sup>240</sup>**

253 191 <sup>264</sup>

176 186

191

**172**  186

180 186

219 245 191 <sup>249</sup>

**VVMD 36** 

> 261 271

> 266

261

272

249 259

**236 240**

249 259

**103 237**  262

heterozygotic status, in other 4 cultivars (Table 2 and Table 3).

which explains its high mutational rate (Oliveira et al., 2006).

**Cultivar Microsatellite loci ZAG7 ZAG12ZAG15ZAG62ZAG79VVS1VVS2VVS4VVMD**

174 194 - <sup>178</sup>

246 <sup>250</sup><sup>178</sup> <sup>131</sup>

196 - <sup>179</sup>

254

250 254

**228**

248 258

the literature (see Table 1). Dashes – no amplicon has been obtained.

<sup>172</sup>196 246 177 **<sup>128</sup>** <sup>168</sup> **<sup>187</sup>**

176

179

<sup>247</sup><sup>178</sup> <sup>135</sup>

170 178

<sup>188</sup> <sup>129</sup> <sup>169</sup>

148

**128**

Table 2. Allelic size (number of base pairs) at 15 microsatellite loci, in 4 grapevine varieties cultivated also in Romania and Republic of Moldova (see section 3.). *R* – Romania; *M* – Republic of Moldova. Bolded numbers – allelic variants shorter than the allele sizes cited in

**206**

190

196

190 196

**205**

157 150 <sup>172</sup>

158 170 <sup>164</sup>

107 153 <sup>165</sup>

155 148 <sup>162</sup>

<sup>157</sup><sup>147</sup>

156 165 163 <sup>200</sup>

192

157 148 162 198 <sup>246</sup>

164

156 164 <sup>190</sup>

156 166 163 <sup>190</sup>

*Fetească albă R*

*Fetească albă M* 

*Fetească regală R*

*Fetească regală M* 

*Fetească neagră R*

*Fetească neagră M* 

*Cabernet Sauvign. R*

*Cabernet Sauvign. M* 


Table 3. Allelic size (number of base pairs) at 15 microsatellite loci, in 6 grapevine varieties cultivated in Romania or Republic of Moldova (see section 3.) *R* – Romania; *M* – Republic of Moldova. Bolded numbers – allelic variants shorter than the allele sizes cited in the literature (see Table 1). Dashes – no amplicon has been obtained.

The **VrZAG 79** locus was identified on the linkage group corresponding to chromosome 5 of the *Vitis vinifera* complement (Riaz et al., 2004; Troggio et al., 2007; Vezzulli et al., 2008). Like VrZAG62 locus, this region has a high variability of the number of base pairs, generating many allelic variants: in these 14 cultivars, we have found 8 different alleles also in Romanian- and in Moldavian group; the most frequent allelic variant in Romanian cultivars has 246bp (approximately 25%), and in Moldavian ones – 235bp – (approximately 25%) (Table 4 and Table 5); 3 allele forms – those of 228bp, 230bp and 235bp – are outside the allelic size range known in the literature (they are slightly shorter). Interesting, the alleles of 228bp and 230bp have been found in 3 non-Romanian origin cultivars: *Cabernet Sauvignon* (228:247), *Italian Riesling* (230:230) and *Sauvignon* (235:235), existent in Romanian stock collection (Table 2 and Table 3). This aspect indicates that the 3 cultivars were imported in the Romanian grapevine gene pool a long time ago, suffering discrete genetic modifications, under the influence of local molecular mechanisms.

For the **VVS1** microsatellite locus, homozygotic- and also heterozygotic cultivars have been found; the most frequent allelic variant was that of 178bp, in both Romanian and Moldavian group. The frequency of this allele in the 14 analysed cultivars is of 36% in Romanian group, and of 57% in Moldavian group (Table 4 and Table 5). At this locus, like in other SSR loci, some differences appear in the same cultivar provenant from different stock collections (Romanian / Moldavian): *Fetească albă* (R) – 178:183/(M) – 178:178; *Fetească regală* (R) – 177:177/(M) – 178:188; *Cabernet Sauvignon* (R) – 179:179/(M) – 170:178 (Table 2 and Table 3). All the allelic variants found in the 14 cultivars, are within the allelic size interval (Table 1).

Assessment of Diversity in Grapevine Gene Pools

**ZAG12 FA** 

*VVS2 FA* 

*(%)* 

*FA (%)* 

 255 7,14 263 7,14

*VVMD 21* 

**216 71,5** 209 7,1 239 7,14 172 7,2 239 7,1 218 7,1 210 14,3 243 14,3 176 14,3 **249 28,6**  222 7,1 218 14,3 **244 28,6** 182 21,4 **259 28,6**  228 14,3 **219 50,0** 245 21,4 186 21,4 261 14,3 220 14,3 246 7,14 **191 35,7** 267 14,3 253 7,14 271 7,1

Table 4. Frequencies of the allelic variants found at each analysed microsatellite locus, in Romanian stock collection cultivars. Bolded numbers represent the most frequent

**(%)** 

(Oliveira et al., 2006).

**(%)** 

**ZAG7 FA** 

*VVS1 FA* 

*VVMD 14* 

allele/alleles.

*(%)* 

*FA (%)*  *VVMD 17* 

from Romania and Republic of Moldova, Based on SSR Markers Analysis 53

different alleles have been found in the 7 analysed cultivars, with the 240bp allele presenting highest frequency (approximately 57%). 3 of the Moldavian cultivars are homozygous- and 2 are heterozygous for this allele (Table 2 and Table 3). In our previous researches (Gheţea et al., 2010, b; unpublished data) we have found a greater variability and also a relative high number of repetitions in sequenced amplicons of different allelic variants, which indicate that the microsatellite locus is placed in an non-coding region with high mutational rates

**ZAG15 FA** 

**155 42,9** 140 7,1 162 21,4 188 7,1 228 8,3 **157 42,9** 147 7,1 **164 50,0** 190 14,3 230 16,8 158 14,2 **148 43,0** 172 14,3 194 14,3 235 16,8 150 28,5 174 14,3 196 28,6 **246 24,9**  170 14,3 **198 35,7** 247 8,3 248 8,3 252 8,3 254 8,3

*VVS4 FA* 

*(%)* 

*FA (%)*  *VVMD 27* 

176 21,4 **128 50,0** 167 14,3 186 14,3 235 14,3 177 14,3 130 7,1 **168 42,9** 187 7,1 240 7,1 **178 35,8** 135 7,1 169 21,4 191 7,1 **241 21,5**  180 14,3 139 14,3 176 21,4 197 7,1 **248 21,5**  183 7,1 148 21,5 199 14,3 250 7,1 186 7,1 **200 35,8** 254 7,1 207 14,3 256 7,1 258 14,3

**(%)** 

**ZAG62 FA** 

*VVMD6 FA* 

*(%)* 

*FA (%)*  *VVMD 36* 

**(%)** 

**ZAG79 FA** 

*VVMD7 FA* 

*(%)* 

*FA (%)* 

**(%)** 

The **VVS2** locus was identified on the linkage group corresponding to chromosome 11 of the *Vitis vinifera* complement (Riaz et al., 2004; Lowe & Walker, 2006; Troggio et al., 2007; Vezzulli et al., 2008). This locus was selected by the *Vitis* Working Group as SSR marker, due to its high allelic variability. In the 14 cultivars, we found 5 different alleles in Romanian group (most frequent being that of 128bp – 50%), and 8 allelic variants in Moldavian group (most frequent being those of 141bp and 148bp – 21,5% each of them) (Table 4 and Table 5); 2 allelic variants – those of 128bp, and 126bp – are shorter than the allelic size interval known for this locus (Table 1). The allele of 148bp is encountered both in Romanian- and Moldavian stock collection. The allelic variant of 128bp was found in an homozygotic condition in 3 Romanian cultivars: *Fetească albă*, *Fetească regală*, and *Tămâioasă Românească*. *Cabernet Sauvignon* from Moldavian collection has also the 128bp allele, but is heterozygous at this locus (128:141). 3 allelic variants, of 141bp, 129bp and 126bp were encountered only in Moldavian provenance cultivars *Muscat Timpuriu de Bucureşti* (141:141), *Cabernet Sauvignon* (128:141), *Fetească regală* (129:129), and *Fetească neagră* (126:126) (Table 2 and Table 3).

The **VVS4** locus was identified on the linkage group corresponding to chromosome 8 of the *Vitis vinifera* complement (Riaz et al., 2004; Troggio et al., 2007). This SSR region revealed a moderate allelic variability. In Romanian cultivars 4 allelic variants have been detected (with the most frequent, that of 168bp – 43%), while in the Moldavian group only 3 different alleles have been found (with the most frequent, having 176bp – 58%) (Table 4 and Table 5). The 168/169 allelic variants are well conserved in Romanian collection provenance cultivars, also in an homozygotic status (*Fetească albă, Fetească regală, Italian Riesling*), and also in an heterozygotic one (*Sauvignon* and *Cabernet Sauvignon* – 169:176, just like in *Tămâioasă Românească*). The 176bp allele is frequentlyt encountered in Moldavian collection cultivars: *Muscat Timpuriu de Bucureşti* (169:176), *Timpuriu de Cluj* (176:176), and *Apiren extratimpuriu* (176:176) (Table 2 and Table 3). Interesting, although *Muscat Timpuriu de Bucureşti* and *Timpuriu de Cluj* have Romanian origin, and *Apiren extratimpuriu* is a newly created cultivar, its parents having probably a Caucazian origin, the allelic variant of 176bp has a good penetrance and has been stabilized in the Moldavian grapevine gene pool.

The **VVMD6** locus was identified on the linkage group corresponding to chromosome 7 of the *Vitis vinifera* complement (Lowe et al., 2006; Riaz et al., 2004; Troggio et al., 2007; Vezzulli et al., 2008). At this SSR locus, in the 14 analysed cultivars, 7 allelic variants for Romanian- and also for Moldavian cultivars (Table 4 and Table 5) have been detected. The most frequent allelic variant in Romanian cultivars is that of 200bp (approximately 36%), and in Moldavian cultivars – that of 206bp (approximately 36%). Some of the alleles, shorter than the variants cited in the literature for this locus (Table 1), appear in both stock collections: *Fetească neagră* (R) – 186:186; *Fetească regală* (R) – 187:197; *Sauvignon* (R) – 191:200; *Cabernet Sauvignon* (M) – 173:187 (Table 2 and Table 3). The size and frequency of the alleles differ between the two stock collections.

The **VVMD7** locus was identified on the linkage group corresponding to chromosome 7 of the *Vitis vinifera* complement (Adam-Blondon et al., 2004; Lowe et al., 2006; Riaz et al., 2004; Troggio et al., 2007; Vezzulli et al., 2008). This SSR locus presents a high allelic variability, being selected by the *Vitis* Working Group among the recommended SSR markers. In Romanian cultivars, 8 allelic variants have been found, most frequent being those of 241bp and 248bp (approximately 21,5%) (Table 4 and Table 5). For Moldavian cultivars, only 4

The **VVS2** locus was identified on the linkage group corresponding to chromosome 11 of the *Vitis vinifera* complement (Riaz et al., 2004; Lowe & Walker, 2006; Troggio et al., 2007; Vezzulli et al., 2008). This locus was selected by the *Vitis* Working Group as SSR marker, due to its high allelic variability. In the 14 cultivars, we found 5 different alleles in Romanian group (most frequent being that of 128bp – 50%), and 8 allelic variants in Moldavian group (most frequent being those of 141bp and 148bp – 21,5% each of them) (Table 4 and Table 5); 2 allelic variants – those of 128bp, and 126bp – are shorter than the allelic size interval known for this locus (Table 1). The allele of 148bp is encountered both in Romanian- and Moldavian stock collection. The allelic variant of 128bp was found in an homozygotic condition in 3 Romanian cultivars: *Fetească albă*, *Fetească regală*, and *Tămâioasă Românească*. *Cabernet Sauvignon* from Moldavian collection has also the 128bp allele, but is heterozygous at this locus (128:141). 3 allelic variants, of 141bp, 129bp and 126bp were encountered only in Moldavian provenance cultivars *Muscat Timpuriu de Bucureşti* (141:141), *Cabernet Sauvignon*

(128:141), *Fetească regală* (129:129), and *Fetească neagră* (126:126) (Table 2 and Table 3).

Moldavian grapevine gene pool.

differ between the two stock collections.

The **VVS4** locus was identified on the linkage group corresponding to chromosome 8 of the *Vitis vinifera* complement (Riaz et al., 2004; Troggio et al., 2007). This SSR region revealed a moderate allelic variability. In Romanian cultivars 4 allelic variants have been detected (with the most frequent, that of 168bp – 43%), while in the Moldavian group only 3 different alleles have been found (with the most frequent, having 176bp – 58%) (Table 4 and Table 5). The 168/169 allelic variants are well conserved in Romanian collection provenance cultivars, also in an homozygotic status (*Fetească albă, Fetească regală, Italian Riesling*), and also in an heterozygotic one (*Sauvignon* and *Cabernet Sauvignon* – 169:176, just like in *Tămâioasă Românească*). The 176bp allele is frequentlyt encountered in Moldavian collection cultivars: *Muscat Timpuriu de Bucureşti* (169:176), *Timpuriu de Cluj* (176:176), and *Apiren extratimpuriu* (176:176) (Table 2 and Table 3). Interesting, although *Muscat Timpuriu de Bucureşti* and *Timpuriu de Cluj* have Romanian origin, and *Apiren extratimpuriu* is a newly created cultivar, its parents having probably a Caucazian origin, the allelic variant of 176bp has a good penetrance and has been stabilized in the

The **VVMD6** locus was identified on the linkage group corresponding to chromosome 7 of the *Vitis vinifera* complement (Lowe et al., 2006; Riaz et al., 2004; Troggio et al., 2007; Vezzulli et al., 2008). At this SSR locus, in the 14 analysed cultivars, 7 allelic variants for Romanian- and also for Moldavian cultivars (Table 4 and Table 5) have been detected. The most frequent allelic variant in Romanian cultivars is that of 200bp (approximately 36%), and in Moldavian cultivars – that of 206bp (approximately 36%). Some of the alleles, shorter than the variants cited in the literature for this locus (Table 1), appear in both stock collections: *Fetească neagră* (R) – 186:186; *Fetească regală* (R) – 187:197; *Sauvignon* (R) – 191:200; *Cabernet Sauvignon* (M) – 173:187 (Table 2 and Table 3). The size and frequency of the alleles

The **VVMD7** locus was identified on the linkage group corresponding to chromosome 7 of the *Vitis vinifera* complement (Adam-Blondon et al., 2004; Lowe et al., 2006; Riaz et al., 2004; Troggio et al., 2007; Vezzulli et al., 2008). This SSR locus presents a high allelic variability, being selected by the *Vitis* Working Group among the recommended SSR markers. In Romanian cultivars, 8 allelic variants have been found, most frequent being those of 241bp and 248bp (approximately 21,5%) (Table 4 and Table 5). For Moldavian cultivars, only 4 different alleles have been found in the 7 analysed cultivars, with the 240bp allele presenting highest frequency (approximately 57%). 3 of the Moldavian cultivars are homozygous- and 2 are heterozygous for this allele (Table 2 and Table 3). In our previous researches (Gheţea et al., 2010, b; unpublished data) we have found a greater variability and also a relative high number of repetitions in sequenced amplicons of different allelic variants, which indicate that the microsatellite locus is placed in an non-coding region with high mutational rates (Oliveira et al., 2006).




Table 4. Frequencies of the allelic variants found at each analysed microsatellite locus, in Romanian stock collection cultivars. Bolded numbers represent the most frequent allele/alleles.

Assessment of Diversity in Grapevine Gene Pools

*ZAG12 FA* 

*VVS2 FA* 

*(%)* 

*FA (%)*

*(%)*

*ZAG7 FA* 

 *VVS1 FA* 

 *VVMD 14* 

allele/alleles.

*(%)* 

*(%)* 

*FA (%)*  *VVMD 17*

from Romania and Republic of Moldova, Based on SSR Markers Analysis 55

*ZAG15 FA* 

102 14,3 **146 28,6** 163 28,6 189 7,1 **237 25,1**  103 14,3 147 14,3 **164 57,2 190 50,2** 238 8,3 107 14,3 153 14,3 165 7,1 195 7,1 246 8,3 **156 28,6** 155 7,15 192 7,1 196 14,3 248 16,7 157 14,3 156 7,15 200 7,1 250 16,7 158 14,3 165 14,3 205 7,1 253 8,3 166 14,3 206 7,1 254 8,3 258 8,3

*VVS4 FA* 

187 7,1 139 7,1 **206 35,5** 188 7,1 **141 21,5** 207 28,5 **148 21,5** 212 7,2 153 7,1

> *VVMD 21*

170 7,1 126 14,3 169 24,9 173 7,2 **240 57,1 178 57,3** 128 7,1 **176 58,1** 187 7,2 244 14,3 179 14,3 129 14,3 177 17,0 198 7,2 250 14,3 185 7,1 131 7,1 200 7,2 252 14,3

*(%)* 

*FA (%)*

**217 33,2** 217 7,3 243 16,6 176 7,2 103 12,5 218 8,4 218 7,3 **245 25,0** 177 7,2 234 6,25 219 8,4 219 28,4 246 16,6 178 14,3 236 12,5 225 8,4 **220 35,5** 247 8,4 179 14,3 237 6,25 228 8,4 221 14,2 252 8,4 180 7,2 240 12,5 232 16,6 231 7,3 253 16,6 **182 21,3** 259 12,5 236 16,6 255 8,4 186 7,2 260 12,5 **191 21,3** 262 6,25 264 6,25 266 6,25 272 6,25

Table 5. Frequencies of the allelic variants found at each analysed microsatellite locus, in Moldavian stock collection cultivars. Bolded numbers represent the most frequent

The **VVMD36** locus was located on the linkage group corresponding to chromosome 3 of the *Vitis vinifera* complement (Adam-Blondon et al., 2004; Riaz et al., 2004; Troggio et al., 2007; Vezzulli et al., 2008). This is a very interesting microsatellite locus, which revealed particular genetic constitutions, especially for Moldavian cultivars. There is a high genetic variability at this locus, a real mutational "hot spot", generating many allelic variants and also revealing multiallelic profiles in some cultivars. In our researches, we found an

*VVMD 27*

*(%)*

*ZAG62 FA* 

*VVMD6 FA* 

*(%)* 

*FA (%)*

*VVMD 36* 

*(%)*

*ZAG79 FA* 

*VVMD7 FA* 

*(%)* 

*FA (%)* 

*(%)* 

The **VVMD14** locus was identified on the linkage group corresponding to chromosome 5 of the *Vitis vinifera* complement (Riaz et al., 2004). For the 14 analysed cultivars, 4 allelic variants (with the dominant allele of 216bp – approximately 71,5%) have been found in Romanian cultivars, and 7 allelic variants – in Moldavian ones (with the allele of 217bp having the highest frequency - 33%) (Table 4 and Table 5). In both cultivar groups appear shorter allelic variants (216bp, 217bp, 219bp), also in an homozygotic- and heterozygotic condition (Table 2 and Table 3). These shorter alleles could represent a particular feature for the grapevine gene pool from this East-European region.

The **VVMD17** locus was located on the linkage group corresponding to chromosome 18 of the *Vitis vinifera* complement (Adam-Blondon et al., 2004; Troggio et al., 2007; Vezzulli et al., 2008). A moderate variability was revealed by this microsatellite locus: 5 allelic variants in Romanian cultivars (the most frequent alelic variant is that of 219bp – 50%), and 6 variants in Moldavian cultivars (the allele of 220bp has the highest frequency – 35,5%) (Table 4 and Table 5). The relatively low number of allelic variants, and also short repetitive sequences (Gheţea et al., 2010, b) found at this SSR locus, indicate that VVMD17 is probably placed in a coding region of the genome, where the mutational rates are low (Oliveira et al., 2006). A shorter allelic variant than the size interval cited in the literature (Table 1), of 209/210bp, in a heterozygous condition, appears in 3 Romanian cultivars: *Fetească albă, Fetească regală* and *Fetească neagră*. One can say that all these 3 cultivars have the same genetic constitution at this locus – 209/210:219 (Table 2). In Moldavian cultivars, all the allelic variants fit in the allelic size interval, having a homozygous either heterozygous constitution (Table 2 and Table 3).

The **VVMD21** locus is placed on the linkage group corresponding to chromosome 6 of the *Vitis vinifera* complement (Adam-Blondon et al., 2004; Riaz et al., 2004; Lowe et al., 2006). Most of the analysed cultivars presented a heterozygous status for this locus, where we found 8 allelic variants in Romanian cultivars, and 7 different alleles in Moldavian cultivars. In Romanian group, the most frequent allele is that of 244bp (approximately 29%), while in Moldavian group, the highest frequency presented the 245bp allele (approximately 25%) (Table 4 and Table 5). Excepting the short allele of 239bp (found in *Fetească neagră* from Romania), all the other allelic variants fit in the known size interval (Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3).

The **VVMD27** locus is placed on the linkage group corresponding to chromosome 5 of the *Vitis vinifera* complement (Lowe K.M et al., 2006; Riaz et al., 2004; Troggio et al., 2007; Vezzulli et al., 2008). This microsatellite region is among the selected loci as SSR marker for grapevine genetic profiling, due to its high allelic variability revealed among different cultivars. The heterozygous constitution of most of the analysed cultivars indicate that this locus is a mutational dynamic one, placed most probably, in a non-coding region of the grapevine genome. In the 14 cultivars, we found 5 different allelic variants in Romanian group (with the most frequent allele – that of 191bp – approximately 36%), and 8 allelic variants in Moldavian group (here, two different alleles, one - the same as in Romanian cultivars – 182bp and 191bp – presented the highest frequency – approximately 21%) (Table 4 and Table 5). Excepting the *Cabernet Sauvignon* cultivar from Romania (which has an allele of 172bp – at the limit of the size interval), all other allelic variants are in the cited size range (Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3).


The **VVMD14** locus was identified on the linkage group corresponding to chromosome 5 of the *Vitis vinifera* complement (Riaz et al., 2004). For the 14 analysed cultivars, 4 allelic variants (with the dominant allele of 216bp – approximately 71,5%) have been found in Romanian cultivars, and 7 allelic variants – in Moldavian ones (with the allele of 217bp having the highest frequency - 33%) (Table 4 and Table 5). In both cultivar groups appear shorter allelic variants (216bp, 217bp, 219bp), also in an homozygotic- and heterozygotic condition (Table 2 and Table 3). These shorter alleles could represent a particular feature for

The **VVMD17** locus was located on the linkage group corresponding to chromosome 18 of the *Vitis vinifera* complement (Adam-Blondon et al., 2004; Troggio et al., 2007; Vezzulli et al., 2008). A moderate variability was revealed by this microsatellite locus: 5 allelic variants in Romanian cultivars (the most frequent alelic variant is that of 219bp – 50%), and 6 variants in Moldavian cultivars (the allele of 220bp has the highest frequency – 35,5%) (Table 4 and Table 5). The relatively low number of allelic variants, and also short repetitive sequences (Gheţea et al., 2010, b) found at this SSR locus, indicate that VVMD17 is probably placed in a coding region of the genome, where the mutational rates are low (Oliveira et al., 2006). A shorter allelic variant than the size interval cited in the literature (Table 1), of 209/210bp, in a heterozygous condition, appears in 3 Romanian cultivars: *Fetească albă, Fetească regală* and *Fetească neagră*. One can say that all these 3 cultivars have the same genetic constitution at this locus – 209/210:219 (Table 2). In Moldavian cultivars, all the allelic variants fit in the allelic size interval, having a homozygous either heterozygous constitution (Table 2 and

The **VVMD21** locus is placed on the linkage group corresponding to chromosome 6 of the *Vitis vinifera* complement (Adam-Blondon et al., 2004; Riaz et al., 2004; Lowe et al., 2006). Most of the analysed cultivars presented a heterozygous status for this locus, where we found 8 allelic variants in Romanian cultivars, and 7 different alleles in Moldavian cultivars. In Romanian group, the most frequent allele is that of 244bp (approximately 29%), while in Moldavian group, the highest frequency presented the 245bp allele (approximately 25%) (Table 4 and Table 5). Excepting the short allele of 239bp (found in *Fetească neagră* from Romania), all the other allelic variants fit in the known size interval (Table 1, Table 2 and

The **VVMD27** locus is placed on the linkage group corresponding to chromosome 5 of the *Vitis vinifera* complement (Lowe K.M et al., 2006; Riaz et al., 2004; Troggio et al., 2007; Vezzulli et al., 2008). This microsatellite region is among the selected loci as SSR marker for grapevine genetic profiling, due to its high allelic variability revealed among different cultivars. The heterozygous constitution of most of the analysed cultivars indicate that this locus is a mutational dynamic one, placed most probably, in a non-coding region of the grapevine genome. In the 14 cultivars, we found 5 different allelic variants in Romanian group (with the most frequent allele – that of 191bp – approximately 36%), and 8 allelic variants in Moldavian group (here, two different alleles, one - the same as in Romanian cultivars – 182bp and 191bp – presented the highest frequency – approximately 21%) (Table 4 and Table 5). Excepting the *Cabernet Sauvignon* cultivar from Romania (which has an allele of 172bp – at the limit of the size interval), all other allelic variants are in the cited size range

the grapevine gene pool from this East-European region.

Table 3).

Table 3).

(Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3).


Table 5. Frequencies of the allelic variants found at each analysed microsatellite locus, in Moldavian stock collection cultivars. Bolded numbers represent the most frequent allele/alleles.

The **VVMD36** locus was located on the linkage group corresponding to chromosome 3 of the *Vitis vinifera* complement (Adam-Blondon et al., 2004; Riaz et al., 2004; Troggio et al., 2007; Vezzulli et al., 2008). This is a very interesting microsatellite locus, which revealed particular genetic constitutions, especially for Moldavian cultivars. There is a high genetic variability at this locus, a real mutational "hot spot", generating many allelic variants and also revealing multiallelic profiles in some cultivars. In our researches, we found an

Assessment of Diversity in Grapevine Gene Pools

*Cabernet Sauvignon* 

**Romania** 

**Republic of Moldova** 

Martin et al.,

Moncada et al.,

**Romania** 

Santiago et al., 2007

Martin et al.,

Moncada et

**6. Conclusion** 

2003

citations for the same cultivar

*Sauvignon* 

2003

from Romania and Republic of Moldova, Based on SSR Markers Analysis 57

Considering the two non-autochthonous cultivars – *Cabernet Sauvignon* and *Sauvignon* – we have compared genetic profiles obtained by us, for these two famous and geographical highly dispersed cultivars, to other citations from the literature. Table 6 and Table 7 summarize the results. Although we do not have the data for all the SSR loci we have considered in these tables, the comparison sustains the idea that discrete, molecular evolutive mechanisms are developing in every regional gene pool, giving, in time, unique

> **228 247**

> **248 258**

193 245 <sup>136</sup>

**ZAG62 ZAG79 VVS2 VVMD6 VVMD7**

**<sup>148</sup>200 241** 

**173** 

<sup>150</sup>- 237

**241 258** 

236

<sup>255</sup><sup>185</sup>

<sup>255</sup>-

<sup>254</sup>-

**182 191** 

**<sup>187</sup><sup>244</sup>**

<sup>205</sup><sup>236</sup>

**135** 

**128 141** 

**ZAG62 ZAG79 VVS2 VVMD6 VVMD7 VVMD27** 

249 150 - <sup>241</sup>

249 - - <sup>241</sup>

**191 200** 

197 205 209

**148** 

particularities which make it an important and valuable genetic reservoir.

**190 196** 

**190 205** 

187

**190** 

187 193

187 193

al., 2006 - - -

2006 - - - <sup>204</sup>

Table 6. Allelic variants (in base pair number) in 5 SSR loci, determined in *Cabernet Sauvignon* cultivar from Romanian- and Moldavian stock collections, compared to other

**196 235 <sup>128</sup>**

243

243

from Romanian stock collection, compared to other citations for the same cultivar

Table 7. Allelic variants (in base pair number) in 6 SSR loci, determined in *Sauvignon* cultivar

The 15 microsatellite loci we have used, proved to be reliable molecular markers in assessing the genetic profile of the studied grapevine cultivars. A high number of microsatellite markers allow for a rigorous genetic characterization, a fine discrimination between

important number of Moldavian cultivars having more than 2 different alleles at VVMD36 locus. Triallelic (Fig.2) and tetraallelic constitutions (Fig.3) are common in Moldavian grapevine gene pool. Here, we present 2 cultivars: *Cabernet Sauvignon* (103:237:262), and *Apiren extratimpuriu* (103:234:236) (Table 2 and Table 3).

Another phenomenon is also obvious at this SSR locus: a significant allele shortening tendency, an important number of base pairs being deleted. The allele of 103bp is more than a half smaller than the inferior limit of the allelic size interval known for this SSR locus (Table 1). Based on these results, we have presumed that in some microsatellite loci, gene duplication processes, followed by deletion or repeated deletions, take place.

These multiallelic profiles are interpreted by Moncada (Moncada et al., 2006) as a result of either a gene duplication phenomenon, or chimeras produced by mutation in meristematic layers L1 and L2. Such events could be considered as local evolutionary mechanisms that give, in time, particular features of a certain gene pool. Certainly, multiallelic profiles at SSR locus represent a characteristic feature for Moldavian grapevine germplasm collection.

At this locus, considering the 14 cultivars, we found 6 allelic variants in Romanian group (with 2 most frequent alleles, those of 249bp and 259bp – approximately 29% each), and 11 allelic variants in Moldavian cultivars (Table 4 and Table 5).

Fig. 2. Capillary electrophoresis showing a trialellic profile (262:264:266) at VVMD36 locus, for a cultivar from Moldavian stock collection (data not published)

Fig. 3. Capillary electrophoresis showing a tetraalellic profile (258:260:262:264) at VVMD36 locus, for another cultivar from Moldavian stock collection (data not published)

important number of Moldavian cultivars having more than 2 different alleles at VVMD36 locus. Triallelic (Fig.2) and tetraallelic constitutions (Fig.3) are common in Moldavian grapevine gene pool. Here, we present 2 cultivars: *Cabernet Sauvignon* (103:237:262), and

Another phenomenon is also obvious at this SSR locus: a significant allele shortening tendency, an important number of base pairs being deleted. The allele of 103bp is more than a half smaller than the inferior limit of the allelic size interval known for this SSR locus (Table 1). Based on these results, we have presumed that in some microsatellite loci, gene

These multiallelic profiles are interpreted by Moncada (Moncada et al., 2006) as a result of either a gene duplication phenomenon, or chimeras produced by mutation in meristematic layers L1 and L2. Such events could be considered as local evolutionary mechanisms that give, in time, particular features of a certain gene pool. Certainly, multiallelic profiles at SSR locus represent a characteristic feature for Moldavian grapevine germplasm collection.

At this locus, considering the 14 cultivars, we found 6 allelic variants in Romanian group (with 2 most frequent alleles, those of 249bp and 259bp – approximately 29% each), and 11

Fig. 2. Capillary electrophoresis showing a trialellic profile (262:264:266) at VVMD36 locus,

Fig. 3. Capillary electrophoresis showing a tetraalellic profile (258:260:262:264) at VVMD36

locus, for another cultivar from Moldavian stock collection (data not published)

duplication processes, followed by deletion or repeated deletions, take place.

*Apiren extratimpuriu* (103:234:236) (Table 2 and Table 3).

allelic variants in Moldavian cultivars (Table 4 and Table 5).

for a cultivar from Moldavian stock collection (data not published)

Considering the two non-autochthonous cultivars – *Cabernet Sauvignon* and *Sauvignon* – we have compared genetic profiles obtained by us, for these two famous and geographical highly dispersed cultivars, to other citations from the literature. Table 6 and Table 7 summarize the results. Although we do not have the data for all the SSR loci we have considered in these tables, the comparison sustains the idea that discrete, molecular evolutive mechanisms are developing in every regional gene pool, giving, in time, unique particularities which make it an important and valuable genetic reservoir.


Table 6. Allelic variants (in base pair number) in 5 SSR loci, determined in *Cabernet Sauvignon* cultivar from Romanian- and Moldavian stock collections, compared to other citations for the same cultivar


Table 7. Allelic variants (in base pair number) in 6 SSR loci, determined in *Sauvignon* cultivar from Romanian stock collection, compared to other citations for the same cultivar

#### **6. Conclusion**

The 15 microsatellite loci we have used, proved to be reliable molecular markers in assessing the genetic profile of the studied grapevine cultivars. A high number of microsatellite markers allow for a rigorous genetic characterization, a fine discrimination between

Assessment of Diversity in Grapevine Gene Pools

**8. References** 

USA.

from Romania and Republic of Moldova, Based on SSR Markers Analysis 59

Adam-Blondon, A.F., Roux, C., Claux, D., Butterlin, G., Merdinoglu, D. & This P. (2004).

Ausubel, F., Brent, R., Kingston, R., Moore, D., Seidman, J., Smith, J. & Struhl, K. (1990).

Bowers, J.E., Dangl, G.S., Vignani, R. & Meredith, C.P. (1996). Isolation and characterization

Bowers, J.E, Dangl, GS, Meredith, C.P. (1999). Development and characterization of

Dobrei, A., Rotaru, L. & Mustea, M. (2005). *Cultura viţei de vie*, Solness (ed.) ISBN 978-973-

Gheţea, L.G., Motoc, R.M., Popescu, C.F., Barbacar, N., Iancu, D., Constantinescu, C. &

Gheţea, L.G., Motoc, R.M., Popescu, C.F., Barbacar, N., Iancu, D., Constantinescu, C. &

Lowe, K.M. & Walker M.A. (2006). Genetic linkage map of the interspecific grape rootstock

Martin, J.P., Borrego, J., Cabello, F. & Ortiz, J.M. (2003). Characterization of Spanish

Meredith, C.P. (2001). Grapevine Genetics: Probing the past and facing the future. *Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus,* Vol.66, No.1, pp.21-25, ISSN 1331-7768. Moncada, X., Pelsy, F., Merdinoglu, D. & Hinrichsen P. (2006). Genetic diversity and

Oliveira, E.J., Pádua, J.G., Zucchi, M.I., Vencovsky, R. & Vieira M.L.C. (2006). Origin,

Riaz, S., Dangl, G.S., Edwards, K.J. & Meredith, C.P. (2004). A microsatellite marker based

*Theor. Appl. Genet.*, Vol.109, pp.1017-1027, ISSN 0040-5752.

Vol.39 No.4, pp.628-633, ISSN 0831-2796.

pp.243-246, ISSN 002-9254.

729-120-2, Timişoara, Romania.

(2010), pp.116-124, ISSN 1224-5984.

*Genome*, Vol.46, No.1, pp.10-18, ISSN 0831-2796.

Published at http://genome.nrc.ca (January, 2007).

Vol.29, No.2, pp.294-307, ISSN 1415-4757.

pp.116-124, ISSN 1224-5984.

(April, 2006).

(November 2003).

Mapping 245 SSR markers on the *Vitis vinifera* genome: a tool for grape genetics.

*Current Protocols in Molecular Biology*, Vol.1, John Wiley and Sons, New York,

of new polymorphic simple sequence repeat loci in grape (*Vitis vinifera* L.). *Genome*,

additional microsatellite DNA markers for grape. *Am. J. Enol. Vitic*., Vol.50, No.3,

Barbarii, L.E. (2010, a). Genetic profiling of nine grapevine cultivars from Romania, based on SSR markers. *Romanian Biotechnological Letters*, Vol.15, No.1, Supplement

Barbarii, L.E. (2010, b). Genetic variability revealed by sequencing analysis at two microsatellitic loci, in some grapevine cultivars from Romania and Republic of Moldavia. *Romanian Biotechnological Letters*, Vol.15, No.2, Supplement (2010),

cross Ramsey (*Vitis champinii*) x Riparia Gloire (*Vitis riparia*). *Theor. Appl. Genet.*, Vol.112, Springer-Verlag, Online ISSN 1432-2242, DOI:10.1007s00122-006-0264-8

grapevine cultivar diversity using sequence-tagged microsatellite site markers.

geographical dispersal in grapevine clones revealed by microsatellite markers. *Genome*, Vol. 49, pp.1459-1472, Online ISSN 1480-3321, DOI:10.1139/G06-102.

evolution and genome distribution of microsatellites. *Genetics and Molecular Biology*,

framework linkage map of *Vitis vinifera* L. *Theor. Appl. Genet.*, Vol.108, pp.864-872, Springer-Verlag, Online ISSN 1432-2242, DOI:10.1007/s00122-003-1488-5

different cultivars and also pedigree analyses, in order to assess the origins, oldness and phylogenetic relationships between grapevine cultivars.

Some of these SSR loci showed high variability: for the cultivars from Romanian stock collection, the most variable loci have been VrZAG79, VVMD6, VVMD7, and VVMD21; for the cultivars from Moldavian stock collection, high numbers of allelic variants have been found in VrZAG12, VrZAG62, VrZAG79, VVS2, VVMD6, VVMD14, VVMD21, VVMD27 and VVMD36.

Besides a great allelic variability evidenced in these microsatellite loci, a detailed analysis of the genetic constitution of the grapevine cultivars, at each SSR locus, revealed also allelic variants well conserved inside a certain cultivar group (Romanian or Moldavian); these alleles are specific for that germplasm collection. There are also allelic forms conserved in both groups, proving, in some cases, the existence of a phylogenetic relationship between cultivars, or in other cases, being the consequence of the close vicinity and of a multimillenary tradition in grapevine cultivation, of Romania and Republic of Moldova.

Lower variability in some SSR loci (like VrZAG7, VVS4, VVMD17) can be explained by the fact that, very probably, these microsatellite regions are placed in coding regions of the genome, where the mutational rate is low. The conservation of certain allelic variants in these loci is stimulated also by the self-pollination or by repeated artificial selection and vegetative multiplication, if these SSR loci are associated with genes coding for economically important traits.

For Moldavian germplasm, the VVMD36 microsatellite locus proved to be very informative, revealing interesting multiallelic profiles. Significantly shorter allelic variants, and also triallelic loci, have been detected. The observation proves that these shorter alleles and the existence of 3 (or even 4) instead of 2 allelic forms at VVMD36 locus, are specific well conserved genetic features for the Moldavian grapevine gene pool. These results sustain the hypothesis of the existence of an evolutive event at this microsatellite locus: a gene duplication phenomenon followed by a deletion or repeated deletion events could explain this situation.

High genetic variability in a species is a sign of its health, and for an economically important species, it represents a valuable source for agricultural purposes. The final conclusion is that both – Romanian and Moldavian – germplasm collections are characterized by a high diversity, with specific allelic combinations which give unique and valuable features that must be known and inventored, enabling their long-term conservation and use in breeding programs.

#### **7. Acknowledgment**

The research was supported by the Romanian Education and Research Ministry, through the Second National Plan for Research, Development and Innovation, grant no. 51-037 (2007-2010), grant no. 1072 (2009-2011), and by the international grant INTAS 05-104-7654 (2006-2008).

#### **8. References**

58 Horticulture

different cultivars and also pedigree analyses, in order to assess the origins, oldness and

Some of these SSR loci showed high variability: for the cultivars from Romanian stock collection, the most variable loci have been VrZAG79, VVMD6, VVMD7, and VVMD21; for the cultivars from Moldavian stock collection, high numbers of allelic variants have been found in VrZAG12, VrZAG62, VrZAG79, VVS2, VVMD6, VVMD14, VVMD21, VVMD27

Besides a great allelic variability evidenced in these microsatellite loci, a detailed analysis of the genetic constitution of the grapevine cultivars, at each SSR locus, revealed also allelic variants well conserved inside a certain cultivar group (Romanian or Moldavian); these alleles are specific for that germplasm collection. There are also allelic forms conserved in both groups, proving, in some cases, the existence of a phylogenetic relationship between cultivars, or in other cases, being the consequence of the close vicinity and of a multimillenary tradition in grapevine cultivation, of Romania and

Lower variability in some SSR loci (like VrZAG7, VVS4, VVMD17) can be explained by the fact that, very probably, these microsatellite regions are placed in coding regions of the genome, where the mutational rate is low. The conservation of certain allelic variants in these loci is stimulated also by the self-pollination or by repeated artificial selection and vegetative multiplication, if these SSR loci are associated with genes coding for economically

For Moldavian germplasm, the VVMD36 microsatellite locus proved to be very informative, revealing interesting multiallelic profiles. Significantly shorter allelic variants, and also triallelic loci, have been detected. The observation proves that these shorter alleles and the existence of 3 (or even 4) instead of 2 allelic forms at VVMD36 locus, are specific well conserved genetic features for the Moldavian grapevine gene pool. These results sustain the hypothesis of the existence of an evolutive event at this microsatellite locus: a gene duplication phenomenon followed by a deletion or repeated deletion events could explain

High genetic variability in a species is a sign of its health, and for an economically important species, it represents a valuable source for agricultural purposes. The final conclusion is that both – Romanian and Moldavian – germplasm collections are characterized by a high diversity, with specific allelic combinations which give unique and valuable features that must be known and inventored, enabling their long-term conservation and use in breeding

The research was supported by the Romanian Education and Research Ministry, through the Second National Plan for Research, Development and Innovation, grant no. 51-037 (2007-2010), grant no. 1072 (2009-2011), and by the international grant INTAS 05-104-7654

phylogenetic relationships between grapevine cultivars.

and VVMD36.

Republic of Moldova.

important traits.

this situation.

programs.

(2006-2008).

**7. Acknowledgment** 


**Part 3** 

**Protected Horticulture** 

