**Increasing Pregnancy by Improving Embryo Transfer Techniques**

Tahereh Madani and Nadia Jahangiri

*Endocrinology and Female Infertility Department, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran Iran* 

## **1. Introduction**

Embryo transfer (ET) is universally recognized as the final and most critical stage in an in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome (Neithardt et al., 2005; Ghazzawi et al., 1999). The majority of couples (approximately 80%) who undergo IVF reach the embryo transfer stage, yet few pregnancies occur (Mansour & Aboulghar, 2002; Adamson et al., 2006). Although embryo genetic abnormalities (Munne et al., 1995) and imperfections in uterine receptivity are some important factors which influence implantation, embryo transfer technique may be directly responsible for a lot of unsuccessful embryo implantations. Embryo transfer necessitates the joint attempts of the reproductive biologist and the clinician. Without healthy embryos, embryo transfer will fail. On the other hand, a poor embryo transfer technique often results in embryo implantation failure (Schoolcraft et al., 2001). However, comparatively less attention has been paid to ET techniques than IVF technique (Mansour & Aboulghar, 2002; Schoolcraft et al., 2001). This might be due to misconception of some clinicians in which the type of transfer does not affect the outcome (Schoolcraft et al., 2001). The early researchers recommended that a careful embryo transfer technique is necessary for successful IVF (Meldrum et al., 1987). Recently, many investigators have identified the relationship between IVF outcome and different techniques and they have noted a pregnancy rate of 33.3% for "excellent" transfers, and 10.5% for "poor" transfers (Englert et al., 1986, as cited in Schoolcraft et al., 2001). In this chapter we attempt to review the variables and, techniques that may refine the embryo transfer technique and divide them to the following three stages: before, during, and after embryo transfer.

## **2. First stage: The preparation before embryo transfer**

Variables affecting the pregnancy rate include: evaluation of the cervico-uterine axis, the performance of a dummy or mock transfer, and appropriate evaluation of the uterine cavity (Derks et al., 2009).

### **2.1 Evaluating the cervico-uterine axis**

This evaluation is necessary to ensure suitable embryos placement. It can be undertaken by both dummy embryo transfer and ultrasonography. Both procedures are important for

Increasing Pregnancy by Improving Embryo Transfer Techniques 137

growth factors, known to play important roles in implantation (Basak et al., 2002). Although several studies have reported good outcomes following hysteroscopic polypectomy during ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles (Batioglu & Kaymak, 2005; Madani et al., 2009b), due to debates over this topic, it is advisable to evaluate the uterine cavity prior to stimulation in

A great attention has been paid to the embryo transfer technique during IVF. To ensure success, the crucial technique is to deposit embryos in the uterine cavity in the least traumatic manner possible (Mansour et al., 1990). Factors of influencing the pregnancy rate during this stage include (Derks et al., 2009; Schoolcraft et al., 2001) 1) cervical preparation, removal of mucus or blood on the catheter; 2) straightening the utero-cervical angle; 3) ultrasound use; 4) type of catheter; 5) Loading the embryo medium; 6) Embryo load method for transfer; 7) time of embryo transfer with regard to uterine contractions problem; 8) air

Cervical mucus seems to interfere with embryo entry into the uterus from the transfer catheter. This interference can be caused by excess cervical mucus that cover the transfer catheter and make the injection of the embryos effortless (Visschers et al., 2007). The presence of blood or mucus on the catheter, from tissues trauma, may also reduce implantation rates (Schoolcraft et al., 2001). It has been reported that, while drawing the catheter, cervical mucus may surround the embryos and dislodge them from their original place (Eskandar et al., 2007). Contamination of the catheter tip and uterus by cervical flora is another risk that has been reported to correlate with a lower pregnancy rate (Eskandar et al., 2007; Derks et al., 2009). The endometrial cavity may also be contaminated by cervical mucus. In a study performed by Egbase and colleagues (Egbase et al., 1996), positive cultures of the cervical mucus (70.9%) and catheter tip (49.1%) have been reported. The researchers noted improved clinical pregnancy rates for catheter tip-negative (57.1%) women compared with catheter-tip positive (29.6%) women. Similarly, another investigator has shown that the positive culture has a significant negative impact on transfer outcome (Fanchin et al., 1998a). Also better results may be obtained when vigorous cervical lavage was used prior to embryo transfer to remove all visible mucus (McNamee et al., 1998). Since bacterial contamination from the cervix and pelvic infections (such as pelvic abscesses) has been reported after embryo transfer (Sauer & Paulson, 1992), we cannot give prominence to

The smooth introduction of the transfer catheter into the uterine cavity can be compromised by the common anteverted uterus, which is found in most women (Sundstrom et al., 1984, as cited in Derks et al., 2009). By straightening the uteru-cervical angle, uterine contractions and insertion trauma will be avoided, thus the embryo transfer success will be much higher. The utero-cervical angle can be straightened by means of following techniques (Derks et al., 2009) 1) distended bladder: a full bladder acts as a useful adjunct for transfer, particularly in cases of retroverted and anteflaxus uterus

injection before withdrawal of the embryo transfer catheter (Madani et al., 2010).

**3.1 Cervical preparation, and removing the mucus or blood on the catheter** 

order to determine the presence of an existing endometrial pathology.

**3. Second stage: Measures during embryo transfer** 

the careful cleaning of the cervix prior to embryo transfer.

**3.2 Straightening the utero-cervical angle** 

evaluating the direction and length of the uterine cavity and cervical canal. To improve the outcome, it has been suggested that a dummy embryo transfer should be performed prior to the stimulation cycle (Mansour et al., 1990), or just before the actual embryo transfer (Sharif et al., 1995). If this technique is performed close to the time of embryo transfer for example at the time of oocyte retrieval, the pregnancy rate will decrease significantly due to late uterine contractions (Madani et al., 2009a). We previously assessed the appropriate time for evaluation of the cervical axis and uterine measurement. A total of 124 women who underwent IVF treatment were included in our study and divided equally into two groups. Measurement of the uterine cavity length from the external cervical os to the fundus, as well as determination of the cervico-uterine axis, was performed on days 2 or 3 of the menstrual cycle or at the time of oocyte retrieval. Our results indicated a statistically significant difference in clinical pregnancy rates between the two groups (64.2% vs. 35.8%, P<0.005). Also, our results showed that the time of measurement affected clinical pregnancy rates in IVF cycles and the best time for uterine measurement is probably on days 2 or 3 of menstruation (Madani et al., 2009a).

#### **2.2 Performing a dummy or mock transfer**

Many unexpected agents make entering the uterine cavity difficult, such as cervical polyps or fibroids, a pin-point external os, and cervical deformation due to congenital anomalies or resulting from a previous surgery, all of which can be discovered by a 'dummy' or 'mock' transfer. In the case of cervical stenosis, cervical dilatation should be performed before ovarian stimulation (Mansour & Aboulghar, 2002).

#### **2.3 Appropriate evaluation of the uterine cavity**

Assessment of the uterine cavity by ultrasonography prior to the IVF cycle is essential for detecting uterine polyps as well as any fibroids that may be invading the uterine cavity or deformities to the cervical canal (Mansour & Aboulghar, 2002; Niknejadi et al., 2010). Polyps are the most common structural pathologies in the uterine cavity (Isikoglu et al., 2006) which it's incidental finding during ovarian stimulation, in either IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles, is a challenge.

Polyp size (Lass et al., 1999; Isikoglu et al., 2006) and location (Yanaihara et al., 2008) may influence the success of embryo implantation during assisted reproductive treatment cycles. According to some research studies, endometrial polyps less than 1.5cm do not negatively influence the pregnancy outcome, whereas increased loss of pregnancy has been reported in others (Lass et al., 1999; Isikoglu et al., 2006). Endometrial damage by endometrial sampling (Barash et al., 2003) or hysteroscopic polypectomy (Varasteh et al., 1999; Spiewankiewicz et al., 2003; Stamatellos et al., 2008) may significantly improve the pregnancy rates. Recently, we reported the outcome of nine women with endometrial polyps less than 1.5 cm after hysteroscopic polypectomy (Madani et al., 2009b). Polypectomy was performed during ovarian stimulation (in eight patients with the standard long protocol) or during hormone replacement therapy (in one donor egg recipient). The interval between polyp resection and embryo transfer was 2–16 days. A relatively high pregnancy rate was noted in our study. One possible mechanism that has been proposed for the improvement of endometrial receptivity following endometrial damage by hysteroscopic polypectomy could be the events related to wound healing. During this process, there is a massive secretion of different cytokines and

evaluating the direction and length of the uterine cavity and cervical canal. To improve the outcome, it has been suggested that a dummy embryo transfer should be performed prior to the stimulation cycle (Mansour et al., 1990), or just before the actual embryo transfer (Sharif et al., 1995). If this technique is performed close to the time of embryo transfer for example at the time of oocyte retrieval, the pregnancy rate will decrease significantly due to late uterine contractions (Madani et al., 2009a). We previously assessed the appropriate time for evaluation of the cervical axis and uterine measurement. A total of 124 women who underwent IVF treatment were included in our study and divided equally into two groups. Measurement of the uterine cavity length from the external cervical os to the fundus, as well as determination of the cervico-uterine axis, was performed on days 2 or 3 of the menstrual cycle or at the time of oocyte retrieval. Our results indicated a statistically significant difference in clinical pregnancy rates between the two groups (64.2% vs. 35.8%, P<0.005). Also, our results showed that the time of measurement affected clinical pregnancy rates in IVF cycles and the best time for uterine measurement is probably on days 2 or 3 of

Many unexpected agents make entering the uterine cavity difficult, such as cervical polyps or fibroids, a pin-point external os, and cervical deformation due to congenital anomalies or resulting from a previous surgery, all of which can be discovered by a 'dummy' or 'mock' transfer. In the case of cervical stenosis, cervical dilatation should be performed before

Assessment of the uterine cavity by ultrasonography prior to the IVF cycle is essential for detecting uterine polyps as well as any fibroids that may be invading the uterine cavity or deformities to the cervical canal (Mansour & Aboulghar, 2002; Niknejadi et al., 2010). Polyps are the most common structural pathologies in the uterine cavity (Isikoglu et al., 2006) which it's incidental finding during ovarian stimulation, in either IVF or intracytoplasmic

Polyp size (Lass et al., 1999; Isikoglu et al., 2006) and location (Yanaihara et al., 2008) may influence the success of embryo implantation during assisted reproductive treatment cycles. According to some research studies, endometrial polyps less than 1.5cm do not negatively influence the pregnancy outcome, whereas increased loss of pregnancy has been reported in others (Lass et al., 1999; Isikoglu et al., 2006). Endometrial damage by endometrial sampling (Barash et al., 2003) or hysteroscopic polypectomy (Varasteh et al., 1999; Spiewankiewicz et al., 2003; Stamatellos et al., 2008) may significantly improve the pregnancy rates. Recently, we reported the outcome of nine women with endometrial polyps less than 1.5 cm after hysteroscopic polypectomy (Madani et al., 2009b). Polypectomy was performed during ovarian stimulation (in eight patients with the standard long protocol) or during hormone replacement therapy (in one donor egg recipient). The interval between polyp resection and embryo transfer was 2–16 days. A relatively high pregnancy rate was noted in our study. One possible mechanism that has been proposed for the improvement of endometrial receptivity following endometrial damage by hysteroscopic polypectomy could be the events related to wound healing. During this process, there is a massive secretion of different cytokines and

menstruation (Madani et al., 2009a).

**2.2 Performing a dummy or mock transfer** 

ovarian stimulation (Mansour & Aboulghar, 2002).

**2.3 Appropriate evaluation of the uterine cavity** 

sperm injection (ICSI) cycles, is a challenge.

growth factors, known to play important roles in implantation (Basak et al., 2002). Although several studies have reported good outcomes following hysteroscopic polypectomy during ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles (Batioglu & Kaymak, 2005; Madani et al., 2009b), due to debates over this topic, it is advisable to evaluate the uterine cavity prior to stimulation in order to determine the presence of an existing endometrial pathology.

## **3. Second stage: Measures during embryo transfer**

A great attention has been paid to the embryo transfer technique during IVF. To ensure success, the crucial technique is to deposit embryos in the uterine cavity in the least traumatic manner possible (Mansour et al., 1990). Factors of influencing the pregnancy rate during this stage include (Derks et al., 2009; Schoolcraft et al., 2001) 1) cervical preparation, removal of mucus or blood on the catheter; 2) straightening the utero-cervical angle; 3) ultrasound use; 4) type of catheter; 5) Loading the embryo medium; 6) Embryo load method for transfer; 7) time of embryo transfer with regard to uterine contractions problem; 8) air injection before withdrawal of the embryo transfer catheter (Madani et al., 2010).

#### **3.1 Cervical preparation, and removing the mucus or blood on the catheter**

Cervical mucus seems to interfere with embryo entry into the uterus from the transfer catheter. This interference can be caused by excess cervical mucus that cover the transfer catheter and make the injection of the embryos effortless (Visschers et al., 2007). The presence of blood or mucus on the catheter, from tissues trauma, may also reduce implantation rates (Schoolcraft et al., 2001). It has been reported that, while drawing the catheter, cervical mucus may surround the embryos and dislodge them from their original place (Eskandar et al., 2007). Contamination of the catheter tip and uterus by cervical flora is another risk that has been reported to correlate with a lower pregnancy rate (Eskandar et al., 2007; Derks et al., 2009). The endometrial cavity may also be contaminated by cervical mucus. In a study performed by Egbase and colleagues (Egbase et al., 1996), positive cultures of the cervical mucus (70.9%) and catheter tip (49.1%) have been reported. The researchers noted improved clinical pregnancy rates for catheter tip-negative (57.1%) women compared with catheter-tip positive (29.6%) women. Similarly, another investigator has shown that the positive culture has a significant negative impact on transfer outcome (Fanchin et al., 1998a). Also better results may be obtained when vigorous cervical lavage was used prior to embryo transfer to remove all visible mucus (McNamee et al., 1998). Since bacterial contamination from the cervix and pelvic infections (such as pelvic abscesses) has been reported after embryo transfer (Sauer & Paulson, 1992), we cannot give prominence to the careful cleaning of the cervix prior to embryo transfer.

#### **3.2 Straightening the utero-cervical angle**

The smooth introduction of the transfer catheter into the uterine cavity can be compromised by the common anteverted uterus, which is found in most women (Sundstrom et al., 1984, as cited in Derks et al., 2009). By straightening the uteru-cervical angle, uterine contractions and insertion trauma will be avoided, thus the embryo transfer success will be much higher. The utero-cervical angle can be straightened by means of following techniques (Derks et al., 2009) 1) distended bladder: a full bladder acts as a useful adjunct for transfer, particularly in cases of retroverted and anteflaxus uterus

Increasing Pregnancy by Improving Embryo Transfer Techniques 139

increasing the probability of the embryo adhering to the uterus, adherence compounds have been developed which are added to the embryo transfer medium. One natural and most important adherent macromolecule recommended to be introduced into transfer media is hyaluronic acid which is known as an implantation enhancing-molecule (Bontekoe et al., 2010). Despite the lack of evidence, an exact mechanism by which hyaluronic acid improves implantation has led to the speculation that it increases cell-to-cell adhesion and cell-tomatrix adhesion (Turley & Moore, 1984 as cited in Bontekoe et al., 2010). Hyaluronic acid generates a viscous solution that might improve the embryo transfer process, preventing

Albumin is a macromolecule traditionally used as the main macromolecule in most culture media. Serum albumin, which is derived from blood, is an impure substance and there is a risk of contamination through the transmission of viruses. Studies have demonstrated that hyaluronic acid has a positive effect on pregnancy rates and can successfully replace albumin as a transfer medium (Simon et al., 2003; Mahani & Davar, 2007). The results of mouse studies have revealed significantly higher implantation and embryo development following addition of hyaluronic acid to the transfer medium when compared to transfer medium with no hyaluronic acid (Gardner 1999). EmbryoGlue ® is a useful and available embryo transfer medium with a high concentration of hyaluronic acid which in some infertile patients it can improve clinical implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates. We have previously evaluated the efficacy of Embryo-Glue® as a human embryo transfer medium in IVF/ICSI cycles on 815 patients who were randomly divided into study (n=417) and control (n=398) groups. In both groups, the embryo culture medium was G-1TMver 3, supplemented with 10% recombinant human albumin. On the day of embryo transfer (day 3), excellent or good quality embryos were selected for transfer and then were placed in either Embryo-Glue® (study group) or fresh culture medium (control group) prior to transfer. According to our results, a significantly higher rates of clinical pregnancy and implantation in the tubal factors, a significantly better implantation rate in recurrent implantation failures were observed with Embryo-Glue® than

The final aim of embryo transfer is to transport the embryo close to the fundal wall to create optimal conditions for implantation in the endometrium. Although there are different methods of catheter loading in IVF centers, similarities are observed in using the transfer of small volumes which are compositions of a sequence of air and liquid contents. It has been postulated that if the contents of the catheter load consist of liquid alone, the distribution of the embryos may occur throughout a larger area. On the other hand, since the uterine tissue can absorb air faster than liquid, the use of air in the transferred liquid can be beneficial (Eytan et al., 2004). The method of embryo transfer at our fertility center and in the majority of centers is the three-drop procedure (Friedman et al., 2011), with air bubbles separating the drop of medium that contains the embryo from two drops of Embryo-Glue® before and

The advantage of using the air and liquid content for catheter loading is to prevent the embryo from adhering to the wall of the catheter at the time of injection (Eytan et al., 2004). The presence of two air bubbles on both sides of the medium that contains the embryo prevents the transfer of the embryo within the catheter (Eytan et al., 2004) and beside, in the

embryo expulsion (Simon et al., 2003).

G-1TMver3 (Valojerdi et al., 2006).

after the embryo drop (Figure. 1).

**3.6 Embryo load method for transfer** 

(Abou-Setta, 2007; Lewin et al., 1997); 2) gripping the cervix with a tenaculum 3) using an inner metal guide; 4) changing the patient position during embryo transfer.

#### **3.3 Use of ultrasound guidance**

Embryos are generally deposited in the uterine cavity by means of a transcervical transfer catheter. Traditionally, the "clinical touch" method has been used to guide catheter placement approximately 1 cm from the uterine fundus. This is a blind technique and clinicians must rely on their sense of touch to judge whether the transfer catheter has been introduced in its proper place (Brown et al., 2010). Therefore this method is often unreliable for evaluating the correct catheter location. Woolcott and Stanger (Woolcott & Stanger, 1997) used transvaginal ultrasound for embryo transfer so that catheter insertion to endometrial surface and uterine fundus was observed. They reported optimal catheter insertion in less than half of the cases because of the catheter either indenting or becoming embedded in the endometrium. It has been demonstrated that ultrasound-guided embryo transfer is helpful for women who have previously had difficult transfers (Kan et al., 1999), and that the rates of implantation and pregnancy have a significantly improvement (Coroleu et al., 2000). Other important benefits of ultrasound guided embryo transfer include providing an opportunity to observe the transfer catheter, the air bubble, the endometrial cavity and the endometrial feature (Strickler et al., 1985). The transferred air bubbles are often considered a marker for the embryo's position in the uterus. By performing the transfer under ultrasonographic guidance, the catheter and air bubble can be precisely located (Lambers et al., 2007). Based on some studies, catheter insertion at 1.5 or 2 cm from the fundus is better than insertion at 1 cm from the fundus (Coroleu et al., 2002). The air bubble position at embryo transfer is relevant to the pregnancy rate (Lambers et al., 2007).

#### **3.4 Type of catheter**

A Soft, flexible embryo transfer catheter is the best choice for minimizing the risk of trauma to the endocervix or endometrium, facilitating smooth insertion. Earlier studies have reported the benefit of using a soft catheter for embryo transfer. Many studies have evaluated various types of embryo transfer catheters and have confirmed a significantly better pregnancy rate with the use of soft catheters (Wood et al., 2000; Wisanto et al., 1989; Mansour et al., 1994; Ghazzawi et al., 1999; Mansour & Aboulghar, 2002). It is important to point out that in order to benefits from the catheter's softness; the outer rigid sheath should be stopped just at the internal cervical os, and not pushed beyond it. Stimulation due to passage of the embryo transfer catheter through the internal cervical os, can start contractions, which are caused by the release of prostaglandins (Fraser, 1992). Therefore, the idea of performing an embryo transfer without cervical manipulation seems wise (Dorn et al., 1999; Lesny et al., 1999b; Mansour & Aboulghar, 2002). In all, it is highly recommended to use agents that can facilitate a smooth embryo transfer and reduce unintended stimulation of the fundus, for example the application of soft-tipped catheters, which can improve pregnancy rate (Neithardt et al., 2005).

#### **3.5 Loading the embryo medium**

The composition of the medium that surrounds the embryo during embryo transfer is believed to be important at this critical stage. To enhance the chances of pregnancy by

(Abou-Setta, 2007; Lewin et al., 1997); 2) gripping the cervix with a tenaculum 3) using an

Embryos are generally deposited in the uterine cavity by means of a transcervical transfer catheter. Traditionally, the "clinical touch" method has been used to guide catheter placement approximately 1 cm from the uterine fundus. This is a blind technique and clinicians must rely on their sense of touch to judge whether the transfer catheter has been introduced in its proper place (Brown et al., 2010). Therefore this method is often unreliable for evaluating the correct catheter location. Woolcott and Stanger (Woolcott & Stanger, 1997) used transvaginal ultrasound for embryo transfer so that catheter insertion to endometrial surface and uterine fundus was observed. They reported optimal catheter insertion in less than half of the cases because of the catheter either indenting or becoming embedded in the endometrium. It has been demonstrated that ultrasound-guided embryo transfer is helpful for women who have previously had difficult transfers (Kan et al., 1999), and that the rates of implantation and pregnancy have a significantly improvement (Coroleu et al., 2000). Other important benefits of ultrasound guided embryo transfer include providing an opportunity to observe the transfer catheter, the air bubble, the endometrial cavity and the endometrial feature (Strickler et al., 1985). The transferred air bubbles are often considered a marker for the embryo's position in the uterus. By performing the transfer under ultrasonographic guidance, the catheter and air bubble can be precisely located (Lambers et al., 2007). Based on some studies, catheter insertion at 1.5 or 2 cm from the fundus is better than insertion at 1 cm from the fundus (Coroleu et al., 2002). The air bubble position at

inner metal guide; 4) changing the patient position during embryo transfer.

embryo transfer is relevant to the pregnancy rate (Lambers et al., 2007).

A Soft, flexible embryo transfer catheter is the best choice for minimizing the risk of trauma to the endocervix or endometrium, facilitating smooth insertion. Earlier studies have reported the benefit of using a soft catheter for embryo transfer. Many studies have evaluated various types of embryo transfer catheters and have confirmed a significantly better pregnancy rate with the use of soft catheters (Wood et al., 2000; Wisanto et al., 1989; Mansour et al., 1994; Ghazzawi et al., 1999; Mansour & Aboulghar, 2002). It is important to point out that in order to benefits from the catheter's softness; the outer rigid sheath should be stopped just at the internal cervical os, and not pushed beyond it. Stimulation due to passage of the embryo transfer catheter through the internal cervical os, can start contractions, which are caused by the release of prostaglandins (Fraser, 1992). Therefore, the idea of performing an embryo transfer without cervical manipulation seems wise (Dorn et al., 1999; Lesny et al., 1999b; Mansour & Aboulghar, 2002). In all, it is highly recommended to use agents that can facilitate a smooth embryo transfer and reduce unintended stimulation of the fundus, for example the application of soft-tipped catheters, which can

The composition of the medium that surrounds the embryo during embryo transfer is believed to be important at this critical stage. To enhance the chances of pregnancy by

**3.3 Use of ultrasound guidance** 

**3.4 Type of catheter** 

improve pregnancy rate (Neithardt et al., 2005).

**3.5 Loading the embryo medium** 

increasing the probability of the embryo adhering to the uterus, adherence compounds have been developed which are added to the embryo transfer medium. One natural and most important adherent macromolecule recommended to be introduced into transfer media is hyaluronic acid which is known as an implantation enhancing-molecule (Bontekoe et al., 2010). Despite the lack of evidence, an exact mechanism by which hyaluronic acid improves implantation has led to the speculation that it increases cell-to-cell adhesion and cell-tomatrix adhesion (Turley & Moore, 1984 as cited in Bontekoe et al., 2010). Hyaluronic acid generates a viscous solution that might improve the embryo transfer process, preventing embryo expulsion (Simon et al., 2003).

Albumin is a macromolecule traditionally used as the main macromolecule in most culture media. Serum albumin, which is derived from blood, is an impure substance and there is a risk of contamination through the transmission of viruses. Studies have demonstrated that hyaluronic acid has a positive effect on pregnancy rates and can successfully replace albumin as a transfer medium (Simon et al., 2003; Mahani & Davar, 2007). The results of mouse studies have revealed significantly higher implantation and embryo development following addition of hyaluronic acid to the transfer medium when compared to transfer medium with no hyaluronic acid (Gardner 1999). EmbryoGlue ® is a useful and available embryo transfer medium with a high concentration of hyaluronic acid which in some infertile patients it can improve clinical implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates. We have previously evaluated the efficacy of Embryo-Glue® as a human embryo transfer medium in IVF/ICSI cycles on 815 patients who were randomly divided into study (n=417) and control (n=398) groups. In both groups, the embryo culture medium was G-1TMver 3, supplemented with 10% recombinant human albumin. On the day of embryo transfer (day 3), excellent or good quality embryos were selected for transfer and then were placed in either Embryo-Glue® (study group) or fresh culture medium (control group) prior to transfer. According to our results, a significantly higher rates of clinical pregnancy and implantation in the tubal factors, a significantly better implantation rate in recurrent implantation failures were observed with Embryo-Glue® than G-1TMver3 (Valojerdi et al., 2006).

#### **3.6 Embryo load method for transfer**

The final aim of embryo transfer is to transport the embryo close to the fundal wall to create optimal conditions for implantation in the endometrium. Although there are different methods of catheter loading in IVF centers, similarities are observed in using the transfer of small volumes which are compositions of a sequence of air and liquid contents. It has been postulated that if the contents of the catheter load consist of liquid alone, the distribution of the embryos may occur throughout a larger area. On the other hand, since the uterine tissue can absorb air faster than liquid, the use of air in the transferred liquid can be beneficial (Eytan et al., 2004). The method of embryo transfer at our fertility center and in the majority of centers is the three-drop procedure (Friedman et al., 2011), with air bubbles separating the drop of medium that contains the embryo from two drops of Embryo-Glue® before and after the embryo drop (Figure. 1).

The advantage of using the air and liquid content for catheter loading is to prevent the embryo from adhering to the wall of the catheter at the time of injection (Eytan et al., 2004). The presence of two air bubbles on both sides of the medium that contains the embryo prevents the transfer of the embryo within the catheter (Eytan et al., 2004) and beside, in the

Increasing Pregnancy by Improving Embryo Transfer Techniques 141

A higher occurrence of immediate or delayed embryo expulsion is correlated with capillary action or the negative force created by moving the catheter back (Schoolcraft et al., 2001; Woolcott & Stanger, 1997). Some researchers have indicated that 15% of the transferred embryos are pushed out after embryo transfer and are found in the catheter tip, cervix and on the vaginal speculum (Mansour, 2005, Poindexter et al., 1986). This can be a reason for

Pushing 0.2 mL of air into the catheter immediately following embryo transfer is an easy and low-cost addition to standard embryo transfer techniques (Madani et al., 2010). This appears to improve pregnancy rates. Recently we used this improved technique to perform 110 infertile women embryo transfers, and obtained a significant higher implantation and clinical pregnancy rates than controls. In this research, our purpose was to prevent embryo expulsion. By pushing air gently after driving out the embryos into the uterine cavity, we have tried to generate a positive air pressure in order to stop embryos from back-tracking with the catheter removal, or the creation of a force against the waves generated by uterine contractions, thus finally reducing the rate of embryo expulsion. However, we recommend further randomized clinical studies to confirm better treatment outcomes and clarify the exact mechanism of this simple, modified embryo transfer technique (Madani et al., 2010).

Recently, the use of evidence-based guidelines has been emphasized in order to optimize and standardize the embryo transfer protocol. However, there is debate on the posttransfer aspects of the embryo transfer. There are three main approaches for post embryo transfer intervention (Abou-Setta et al., 2009): 1) prevention of the expulsion of fluids and embryos from the cervix; 2) the use of a fibrin sealant (Bar-Hava et al., 1999, Feichtinger et

Closing the cervix following embryo transfer is one method proposed for preventing embryo expulsion. A recent prospective, randomized study has suggested mechanical closure of the cervix (Mansour, 2005) by loosening the screw of the vaginal speculum, following the introduction of the embryo transfer catheter. In this study, the cervical portio-vaginalis was closed by the two lips of the speculum. After gently withdrawing the embryo transfer catheter, the vaginal speculum was left for 5-7 minutes to put pressure on the cervix. Suprapubic heaviness and mild discomfort were the only complications reported in this study. To better confirm the usefulness of this intervention as a postembryo transfer strategy, more well-designed and powered randomized controlled trials

In the investigation by Ben-Rafael et al. (Ben-Rafael et al., 1995), "two step" technique (Feichtinger et al., 1992) has been applied for using a fibrin sealant. In this method, the application of multiple columns of air or medium cause splitting of the fibrin sealant and embryo sections. Initially, the sealant ingredients, followed by either an air or medium

**3.8 Injection of air before embryo transfer catheter withdrawal** 

IVF failure (Ghazzawi et al., 1999; Mansour et al., 1994).

**4. Third stage: Measures after embryo transfer** 

al., 1992); 3) bed rest after embryo transfer (Sharif et al., 1998)

are needed (Abou-Setta et al., 2009).

**4.2 Fibrin sealant** 

**4.1 Prevention of the expulsion of fluids and embryos from the cervix** 

transfer under ultrasonographic guidance, the air bubbles are often considered a marker for the embryo's position in the uterus (Lambers et al., 2007). Finally by loading 1 µl of medium on the catheter tip, the probability of embryo expulsion will be stopped. It has been reported that larger volumes of fluid transferred (60 µl) correlate with retained embryos, yet it is advisable that a certain amount of media be loaded to assist with expelling the embryo (Hearns-Stokes et al., 2000). On the other hand, the transferred air volumes should be small enough to prevent the transport of the embryos into the cervix (Eytan et al., 2004). Based on the fact that a low speed of injection upon the catheter load into the uterus produces bubbles, which assist with transporting more transferred media into the fundus, it is advisable to transfer the embryo gently with minimal ejection speed. However, the speed of injection has not been studied clinically (L. Bungum & M. Bungum, 2009). It is proposed that to minimize the risk of retained embryos, the transfer catheter should be slowly withdrawn (Mansour & Aboulghar, 2002; Eytan et al., 2007).

Fig. 1. The catheter load with a sequence of air and transfer medium

#### **3.7 Time of embryo transfer with regard to uterine contraction problem**

Studies in animals have demonstrated that uterine contractions have an effect on the implantation of embryos (Adams, 1980; Schoolcraft et al., 2001). In a study by Fanchin and colleagues (Fanchin et al., 1998b), the 5 minute ultrasound scans of the uterus were digitized for counting the occurrence of myometrial contractile activity. Their result showed an overall mean uterine contraction frequency of 4.3 per minute. They also noted that with increased frequency of the uterine contractions, the rates of implantation and pregnancy were reduced. The variables correlated with the frequency of uterine contractions are (Schoolcraft et al., 2001) 1) serum progesterone levels on the day of embryo transfer: By increasing progesterone levels, uterine contractions decrease; 2) difficulty of embryo transfer: the occurrence of uterine contractions depends on the difficulty of the embryo transfer. An investigation that used 30 µL of an opaque medium in 14 oocyte donors showed that, with easy mock embryo transfer, the frequency of uterine contractions were not altered and the opaque contrast medium remained for 45 minutes in the upper part of the uterine cavity. Conversely, forceful, random and fundocervical uterine contractions have been shown to occur following a difficult embryo transfer (Lesny et al., 1998); 3) applying a tenaculum: Uterine contractility increases when a tenaculum is used to grasp the cervix (Lesny et al., 1999b); 4) progression into the luteal phase: Uterine contractility lessens with progression into the luteal phase. This can be a causal factor for success of the embryo transfer in the blastocyst stage after five days of culture (Lesny et al., 1999a).

transfer under ultrasonographic guidance, the air bubbles are often considered a marker for the embryo's position in the uterus (Lambers et al., 2007). Finally by loading 1 µl of medium on the catheter tip, the probability of embryo expulsion will be stopped. It has been reported that larger volumes of fluid transferred (60 µl) correlate with retained embryos, yet it is advisable that a certain amount of media be loaded to assist with expelling the embryo (Hearns-Stokes et al., 2000). On the other hand, the transferred air volumes should be small enough to prevent the transport of the embryos into the cervix (Eytan et al., 2004). Based on the fact that a low speed of injection upon the catheter load into the uterus produces bubbles, which assist with transporting more transferred media into the fundus, it is advisable to transfer the embryo gently with minimal ejection speed. However, the speed of injection has not been studied clinically (L. Bungum & M. Bungum, 2009). It is proposed that to minimize the risk of retained embryos, the transfer catheter should be slowly withdrawn

(Mansour & Aboulghar, 2002; Eytan et al., 2007).

Fig. 1. The catheter load with a sequence of air and transfer medium

**3.7 Time of embryo transfer with regard to uterine contraction problem** 

transfer in the blastocyst stage after five days of culture (Lesny et al., 1999a).

Studies in animals have demonstrated that uterine contractions have an effect on the implantation of embryos (Adams, 1980; Schoolcraft et al., 2001). In a study by Fanchin and colleagues (Fanchin et al., 1998b), the 5 minute ultrasound scans of the uterus were digitized for counting the occurrence of myometrial contractile activity. Their result showed an overall mean uterine contraction frequency of 4.3 per minute. They also noted that with increased frequency of the uterine contractions, the rates of implantation and pregnancy were reduced. The variables correlated with the frequency of uterine contractions are (Schoolcraft et al., 2001) 1) serum progesterone levels on the day of embryo transfer: By increasing progesterone levels, uterine contractions decrease; 2) difficulty of embryo transfer: the occurrence of uterine contractions depends on the difficulty of the embryo transfer. An investigation that used 30 µL of an opaque medium in 14 oocyte donors showed that, with easy mock embryo transfer, the frequency of uterine contractions were not altered and the opaque contrast medium remained for 45 minutes in the upper part of the uterine cavity. Conversely, forceful, random and fundocervical uterine contractions have been shown to occur following a difficult embryo transfer (Lesny et al., 1998); 3) applying a tenaculum: Uterine contractility increases when a tenaculum is used to grasp the cervix (Lesny et al., 1999b); 4) progression into the luteal phase: Uterine contractility lessens with progression into the luteal phase. This can be a causal factor for success of the embryo

## **3.8 Injection of air before embryo transfer catheter withdrawal**

A higher occurrence of immediate or delayed embryo expulsion is correlated with capillary action or the negative force created by moving the catheter back (Schoolcraft et al., 2001; Woolcott & Stanger, 1997). Some researchers have indicated that 15% of the transferred embryos are pushed out after embryo transfer and are found in the catheter tip, cervix and on the vaginal speculum (Mansour, 2005, Poindexter et al., 1986). This can be a reason for IVF failure (Ghazzawi et al., 1999; Mansour et al., 1994).

Pushing 0.2 mL of air into the catheter immediately following embryo transfer is an easy and low-cost addition to standard embryo transfer techniques (Madani et al., 2010). This appears to improve pregnancy rates. Recently we used this improved technique to perform 110 infertile women embryo transfers, and obtained a significant higher implantation and clinical pregnancy rates than controls. In this research, our purpose was to prevent embryo expulsion. By pushing air gently after driving out the embryos into the uterine cavity, we have tried to generate a positive air pressure in order to stop embryos from back-tracking with the catheter removal, or the creation of a force against the waves generated by uterine contractions, thus finally reducing the rate of embryo expulsion. However, we recommend further randomized clinical studies to confirm better treatment outcomes and clarify the exact mechanism of this simple, modified embryo transfer technique (Madani et al., 2010).

## **4. Third stage: Measures after embryo transfer**

Recently, the use of evidence-based guidelines has been emphasized in order to optimize and standardize the embryo transfer protocol. However, there is debate on the posttransfer aspects of the embryo transfer. There are three main approaches for post embryo transfer intervention (Abou-Setta et al., 2009): 1) prevention of the expulsion of fluids and embryos from the cervix; 2) the use of a fibrin sealant (Bar-Hava et al., 1999, Feichtinger et al., 1992); 3) bed rest after embryo transfer (Sharif et al., 1998)

#### **4.1 Prevention of the expulsion of fluids and embryos from the cervix**

Closing the cervix following embryo transfer is one method proposed for preventing embryo expulsion. A recent prospective, randomized study has suggested mechanical closure of the cervix (Mansour, 2005) by loosening the screw of the vaginal speculum, following the introduction of the embryo transfer catheter. In this study, the cervical portio-vaginalis was closed by the two lips of the speculum. After gently withdrawing the embryo transfer catheter, the vaginal speculum was left for 5-7 minutes to put pressure on the cervix. Suprapubic heaviness and mild discomfort were the only complications reported in this study. To better confirm the usefulness of this intervention as a postembryo transfer strategy, more well-designed and powered randomized controlled trials are needed (Abou-Setta et al., 2009).

#### **4.2 Fibrin sealant**

In the investigation by Ben-Rafael et al. (Ben-Rafael et al., 1995), "two step" technique (Feichtinger et al., 1992) has been applied for using a fibrin sealant. In this method, the application of multiple columns of air or medium cause splitting of the fibrin sealant and embryo sections. Initially, the sealant ingredients, followed by either an air or medium

Increasing Pregnancy by Improving Embryo Transfer Techniques 143

Some others analyze single embryo transfer from an economic point of view (Bergh, 2005; Fiddelers et al., 2007). From a societal perspective, these studies show that savings in health costs related to twin pregnancies may equal the direct additional costs of the repeat SET cycles needed to achieve the same take-home baby rate. In many cases, the direct costs of treatment are the responsibility of the patients, whereas the costs related to multiple pregnancies are imposed on both patients and the government (Roberts et al., 2010). Finally, a more cost-effective and safer procedure may be offered by elective single embryo transfer

Despite transferring one or two good quality embryos, there is still a question as to why the transfer is inefficient. The mechanisms underlying the implantation phenomenon are unknown and the clinical implications remain poorly understood. After embryo transfer, the control of the transferred embryos will be lost and we cannot distinguish which embryos reach the endometrial cavity and whether all of them have the same chance of implantation. There are numerous variables involved in embryo implantation and pregnancy, while embryo transfer technique is one of key factors which affect embryo transfer success. For this purpose, embryo transfer must be performed in a gentle and non-traumatic manner. Minimizing blood on the catheter tip (cervical trauma), the cervical mucus, the risk of embryo expulsion or retained embryos, the frequency and severity of uterine contractions, and performing a trial embryo transfer before the actual transfer all seems to be useful for embryo transfer. Additionally, the use of ultrasonographic guidance and soft catheters appears to enhance the chances of a successful outcome. Due to insufficient evidence from clinical trials, it is not clear which factors are crucial. Great attention should be paid to all these factors, which could optimize the embryo transfer. There are a number of questions to be answered by current and future research, in which a better outcome may be achieved. For example, enhanced knowledge about the conditions for implantation can be guidance for providing various types of media that are more compatible with normal embryo development. An improved catheter design perhaps by microcamera, may lead to the efficiency of embryo transfer by minimizing the damage to the uterine cavity, and finally determination of the exact mechanism of uterine contractions (mechanical, chemical or hormonal), may result in the use of materials and new techniques for decreasing the

for patients who undergo assisted reproductive technology.

deleterious effects that occur during embryo transfer.

Vol.86, No.5, PP. 516-22, ISSN 0001-6349

The authors wish to express their gratitude to Royan Institute and the staff.

Abou-Setta, A. M. (2007). Effect of passive uterine straightening during embryo transfer: a

Abou-Setta, A. M., D'angelo, A., Sallam, H. N., Hart, R. J. & Al-Inany, H. G. (2009). Post-

systematic review and meta-analysis*. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica,*

embryo transfer interventions for in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm

**7. Acknowledgment** 

**8. References** 

**6. Conclusion** 

column are loaded into the embryo transfer catheter. This method ends with the loading of a medium column containing the embryos into the transfer catheter. The proximity of the embryos to the uterine cavity and the creation of a layer between the embryos and the uterine cavity (by columns of media and fibrin sealant) are the basis of this technique. According to the theory which states that when embryos are next to the endometrium, the relationship between embryos and the mother tissue becomes easier, thus facilitating the adhesion process, and increasing the pregnancy rate (Abou-Setta et al., 2009). Movement of the fluid from the uterine cavity is an unwanted event after embryo transfer and usually observed in clinical practice (Schulman, 1986; Ghazzawi et al., 1999; Mansour, 2005). Of note, sometimes this fluid contains the transferred embryo (Ghazzawi et al., 1999) and this causes movement of the embryo away from its deposition place (Ghazzawi et al., 1999; Mansour, 2005; Schulman, 1986).

#### **4.3 Bed rest**

It has been speculated that embryo movement after transfer happens with instant mobilization following embryo transfer. A linear relationship between the success rates of embryo transfer and the time spent in a lying position has been seen. Since, limited numbers of embryos are transferred; embryo expulsion usually leads to transfer failure. Any interference that could stop this unintended exclusion would increase pregnancy rate (Abou-Setta et al., 2009). In the past, as a guarantee of success, complete bed rest was prescribed after embryo transfer for at least 24 hours with the aim of stopping the expulsion of fluids that contain the embryo due to gravity. With the intention of making the procedure easier and more patient-friendly, clinicians decided to reduce the time of resting (Sharif et al., 1998). Recent guidelines have considered 15 minutes as the time needed for bed rest (Abou-Setta et al., 2009). According to the research by Purcell and colleagues (Purcell et al., 2007), the bed rest period did not affect clinical pregnancy rate.

#### **5. Single embryo transfer (SET)**

Regardless of many advances in assisted reproductive technologies (ART), the live birth rate is still unsatisfactory; however, the success rate of ART has increased during the past 10-15 years (Gerris, 2009). In accordance with the report of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, the live birth rate has increased by 4% in 6 years (28% in 1996 to 32% in 2002) (Neithardt et al., 2005). It is also important to note that in multiple embryo transfers, although the success rate of the pregnancy will increase, the live birth rate will not raise (Gerris, 2009). Over the past decade, the first study in 2003 indicated a similar pregnancy rate between single embryo transfer and double embryo transfer (Poikkeus & Tiitinen, 2008). Furthermore, on the base of several studies, pregnancy rates equaling double embryo transfer rates have been achieved by utilizing the combination of single embryo transfer and a later frozen embryo transfer (Thurin et al., 2004; Milliez & Dickens, 2009), decreasing the twin birth rate from 25 to 1%. The major benefit of single embryo transfer is the decrease in all known increased risks of obstetric and neonatal complications that are four times higher in twins than in singletons (Davis, 2004; Poikkeus & Tiitinen, 2008; Milliez & Dickens, 2009). Several investigators have proposed that careful patient selection and good quality embryos transfer (elective embryo transfer) reduces the risk of multiple pregnancies while maintaining a comparable live birth rate (Gerris, 2009).

Some others analyze single embryo transfer from an economic point of view (Bergh, 2005; Fiddelers et al., 2007). From a societal perspective, these studies show that savings in health costs related to twin pregnancies may equal the direct additional costs of the repeat SET cycles needed to achieve the same take-home baby rate. In many cases, the direct costs of treatment are the responsibility of the patients, whereas the costs related to multiple pregnancies are imposed on both patients and the government (Roberts et al., 2010). Finally, a more cost-effective and safer procedure may be offered by elective single embryo transfer for patients who undergo assisted reproductive technology.

## **6. Conclusion**

142 Advances in Embryo Transfer

column are loaded into the embryo transfer catheter. This method ends with the loading of a medium column containing the embryos into the transfer catheter. The proximity of the embryos to the uterine cavity and the creation of a layer between the embryos and the uterine cavity (by columns of media and fibrin sealant) are the basis of this technique. According to the theory which states that when embryos are next to the endometrium, the relationship between embryos and the mother tissue becomes easier, thus facilitating the adhesion process, and increasing the pregnancy rate (Abou-Setta et al., 2009). Movement of the fluid from the uterine cavity is an unwanted event after embryo transfer and usually observed in clinical practice (Schulman, 1986; Ghazzawi et al., 1999; Mansour, 2005). Of note, sometimes this fluid contains the transferred embryo (Ghazzawi et al., 1999) and this causes movement of the embryo away from its deposition place (Ghazzawi et al., 1999;

It has been speculated that embryo movement after transfer happens with instant mobilization following embryo transfer. A linear relationship between the success rates of embryo transfer and the time spent in a lying position has been seen. Since, limited numbers of embryos are transferred; embryo expulsion usually leads to transfer failure. Any interference that could stop this unintended exclusion would increase pregnancy rate (Abou-Setta et al., 2009). In the past, as a guarantee of success, complete bed rest was prescribed after embryo transfer for at least 24 hours with the aim of stopping the expulsion of fluids that contain the embryo due to gravity. With the intention of making the procedure easier and more patient-friendly, clinicians decided to reduce the time of resting (Sharif et al., 1998). Recent guidelines have considered 15 minutes as the time needed for bed rest (Abou-Setta et al., 2009). According to the research by Purcell and colleagues (Purcell et al.,

Regardless of many advances in assisted reproductive technologies (ART), the live birth rate is still unsatisfactory; however, the success rate of ART has increased during the past 10-15 years (Gerris, 2009). In accordance with the report of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, the live birth rate has increased by 4% in 6 years (28% in 1996 to 32% in 2002) (Neithardt et al., 2005). It is also important to note that in multiple embryo transfers, although the success rate of the pregnancy will increase, the live birth rate will not raise (Gerris, 2009). Over the past decade, the first study in 2003 indicated a similar pregnancy rate between single embryo transfer and double embryo transfer (Poikkeus & Tiitinen, 2008). Furthermore, on the base of several studies, pregnancy rates equaling double embryo transfer rates have been achieved by utilizing the combination of single embryo transfer and a later frozen embryo transfer (Thurin et al., 2004; Milliez & Dickens, 2009), decreasing the twin birth rate from 25 to 1%. The major benefit of single embryo transfer is the decrease in all known increased risks of obstetric and neonatal complications that are four times higher in twins than in singletons (Davis, 2004; Poikkeus & Tiitinen, 2008; Milliez & Dickens, 2009). Several investigators have proposed that careful patient selection and good quality embryos transfer (elective embryo transfer) reduces the risk of multiple pregnancies while

2007), the bed rest period did not affect clinical pregnancy rate.

maintaining a comparable live birth rate (Gerris, 2009).

Mansour, 2005; Schulman, 1986).

**5. Single embryo transfer (SET)** 

**4.3 Bed rest** 

Despite transferring one or two good quality embryos, there is still a question as to why the transfer is inefficient. The mechanisms underlying the implantation phenomenon are unknown and the clinical implications remain poorly understood. After embryo transfer, the control of the transferred embryos will be lost and we cannot distinguish which embryos reach the endometrial cavity and whether all of them have the same chance of implantation. There are numerous variables involved in embryo implantation and pregnancy, while embryo transfer technique is one of key factors which affect embryo transfer success. For this purpose, embryo transfer must be performed in a gentle and non-traumatic manner. Minimizing blood on the catheter tip (cervical trauma), the cervical mucus, the risk of embryo expulsion or retained embryos, the frequency and severity of uterine contractions, and performing a trial embryo transfer before the actual transfer all seems to be useful for embryo transfer. Additionally, the use of ultrasonographic guidance and soft catheters appears to enhance the chances of a successful outcome. Due to insufficient evidence from clinical trials, it is not clear which factors are crucial. Great attention should be paid to all these factors, which could optimize the embryo transfer. There are a number of questions to be answered by current and future research, in which a better outcome may be achieved. For example, enhanced knowledge about the conditions for implantation can be guidance for providing various types of media that are more compatible with normal embryo development. An improved catheter design perhaps by microcamera, may lead to the efficiency of embryo transfer by minimizing the damage to the uterine cavity, and finally determination of the exact mechanism of uterine contractions (mechanical, chemical or hormonal), may result in the use of materials and new techniques for decreasing the deleterious effects that occur during embryo transfer.

## **7. Acknowledgment**

The authors wish to express their gratitude to Royan Institute and the staff.

## **8. References**


Increasing Pregnancy by Improving Embryo Transfer Techniques 145

Dorn, C., Reinsberg, J., Schlebusch, H., Prietl, G., Van Der Ven, H. & Krebs, D. (1999). Serum

Englert, Y., Puissant, F., Camus, M., Van Hoeck, J. & Leroy, F. (1986). Clinical study on

Eskandar, M. A., Abou-Setta, A. M., El-Amin, M., Almushait, M. A. & Sobande, A. A. (2007).

Eytan, O., Elad, D., Zaretsky, U. & Jaffa, A. J. (2004). A glance into the uterus during in vitro

Eytan, O., Elad, D. & Jaffa, A. J. (2007). Evaluation of the embryo transfer protocol by a

Fanchin, R., Harmas, A., Benaoudia, F., Lundkvist, U., Olivennes, F. & Frydman, R. (1998a).

Fanchin, R., Righini, C., Ayoubi, J. M., Olivennes, F., De Ziegler, D. & Frydman, R. (1998b).

*Contraception, fertilité, sexualité,* Vol.26, No.7-8, PP. 498-505, ISSN 1165-1083 Feichtinger, W., Strohmer, H., Radner, K. M. & Goldin, M. (1992). The use of fibrin sealant

Fiddelers, A. A., Severens, J. L., Dirksen, C. D., Dumoulin, J. C., Land, J. A. & Evers, J. L.

Fraser, I. S. (1992). Prostaglandins, prostaglandin inhibitors and their roles in gynaecological disorders. *Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol,* Vol.6, No.4, PP. 829-57, ISSN 0950-3552 Friedman, B. E., Lathi, R. B., Henne, M. B., Fisher, S. L. & Milki, A. A. (2011). The effect of air

Gardner, D. K., Rodriegez-Martinez, H. & Lane, M. (1999). Fetal development after transfer

Gerris, J. (2009). Single-embryo transfer versus multiple-embryo transfer. *Reproductive* 

Ghazzawi, I. M., Al-Hasani, S., Karaki, R. & Souso, S. (1999). Transfer technique and catheter

of IVF. *Human reproduction,* Vol.14, No.3, PP. 677-82, ISSN 0268-1161

*Human reproduction Update,* Vol.13, No.1, PP. 5-13, ISSN 1355-4786

*and sterility*, Vol.95, No. 3, PP. 944-7, ISSN 0015-0282

*biomedicine online,* Vol.18 Suppl 2, PP. 63-70, ISSN 1472-6483

*embryo transfer,* Vol.3, No.4, PP. 243-6, ISSN 0740-7769

9, ISSN 0268-1161

0268-1161

0015-0282

ISSN 0015-0282

80, ISSN 0268-1161

No.3, PP. 308-13, ISSN 1472-6483

No.6, PP. 890-3, ISSN 0268-1161

oxytocin concentration during embryo transfer procedure. *European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology,* Vol.87, No.1, PP. 77-80, ISSN 0301-2115 Egbase, P. E., Al-Sharhan, M., Al-Othman, S., Al-Mutawa, M., Udo, E. E. & Grudzinskas, J.

G. (1996). Incidence of microbial growth from the tip of the embryo transfer catheter after embryo transfer in relation to clinical pregnancy rate following invitro fertilization and embryo transfer. *Human reproduction,* Vol.11, No.8, PP. 1687-

embryo transfer after human in vitro fertilization. *Journal of in vitro fertilization and* 

Removal of cervical mucus prior to embryo transfer improves pregnancy rates in women undergoing assisted reproduction. *Reproductive biomedicine online,* Vol.14,

simulation of embryo transfer. *Human reproduction*, Vol.19, No.3, PP. 562-9, ISSN

laboratory model of the uterus. *Fertility and sterility*, Vol.88, No.2, PP. 485-93, ISSN

Microbial flora of the cervix assessed at the time of embryo transfer adversely affects in vitro fertilization outcome. *Fertility and sterility,* Vol.70, No.5, PP. 866-70,

[Uterine contractions at the time of embryo transfer: a hindrance to implantation?].

for embryo transfer: development and clinical studies. *Human reproduction,* Vol.7,

(2007). Economic evaluations of single- versus double-embryo transfer in IVF.

bubble position after blastocyst transfer on pregnancy rates in IVF cycles. *Fertility* 

is increased by replacing protein with the glycosaminoglycan hyaluronan for mouse embryo culture and transfer. *Human reproduction*, Vol.14, No.10, PP. 2575-

choice influence the incidence of transcervical embryo expulsion and the outcome

injection patients. *Cochrane database of systematic reviews,* No.4, PP. CD006567, ISSN 1469-493X


Adams, C. E. (1980). Retention and development of eggs transferred to the uterus at various

Adamson, G. D., DE Mouzon, J., Lancaster, P., Nygren, K. G., Sullivan, E. & Zegers-

Bar-Hava, I., Krissi, H., Ashkenazi, J., Orvieto, R., Shelef, M. & Ben-Rafael, Z. (1999). Fibrin

Barash, A., Dekel, N., Fieldust, S., Segal, I., Schechtman, E. & Granot, I. (2003). Local injury

Basak, S., Dubanchet, S., Zourbas, S., Chaouat, G. & Das, C. (2002). Expression of pro-

Batioglu, S. & Kaymak, O. (2005). Does hysteroscopic polypectomy without cycle cancellation affect IVF? *Reproductive biomedicine online,* Vol.10, No.6, PP. 767-9, ISSN 1472-6483 Ben-Rafael, Z., Ashkenazi, J., Shelef, M., Farhi, J., Voliovitch, I., Feldberg, D. & Orvieto, R.

Bergh, C. (2005). Single embryo transfer: a mini-review. *Human reproduction,* Vol.20, No.2,

Bontekoe, S., Blake, D., Heineman, M. J., Williams, E. C. & Johnson, N. (2010). Adherence

*Cochrane database of systematic reviews*, No.7, PP. CD007421, ISSN 1469-493X Brown, J., Buckingham, K., Abou-Setta, A. M. & Buckett, W. (2010). Ultrasound versus

Bungum, L. & Bungum, M. (2009). Embryo transfer, In: *Texbook of assisted reproductive* 

guided study. *Human reproduction,* Vol.17, No.2, PP. 341-6, ISSN 0268-1161 Davis, O. K. (2004). Elective single-embryo transfer--has its time arrived? *The New England* 

Derks, R. S., Farquhar, C., Mol, B. W., Buckingham, K. & Heineman, M. J. (2009). Techniques

*journal of medicine,* Vol.351, No.23, PP. 2440-2, ISSN 0028-4793

No.4, PP. CD007682, ISSN 1469-493X

*database of systematic reviews,* No.1, PP. CD006107, ISSN 1469-493X

*Fertility and sterility,* Vol.85, No.6, PP. 1586-622, ISSN 0015-0282

1469-493X

ISSN 0015-0282

11, ISSN 1046-7408

PP. 323-7, ISSN 0268-1161

1069-3130

PP. 309-15, ISSN 0022-4251

Vol.71, No.5, PP. 821-4, ISSN 0015-0282

injection patients. *Cochrane database of systematic reviews,* No.4, PP. CD006567, ISSN

times after ovulation in the rabbit. *Journal of reproduction and fertility,* Vol.60, No.2,

Hochschild, F. (2006). World collaborative report on in vitro fertilization, 2000.

glue improves pregnancy rates in women of advanced reproductive age and in patients in whom in vitro fertilization attempts repeatedly fail. *Fertility and sterility,*

to the endometrium doubles the incidence of successful pregnancies in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. *Fertility and sterility,* Vol.79, No.6, PP. 1317-22,

inflammatory cytokines in mouse blastocysts during implantation: modulation by steroid hormones. *American journal of reproductive immunolog ,* Vol.47, No.1, PP. 2-

(1995). The use of fibrin sealant in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. *International journal of fertility and menopausal studies,* Vol.40, No.6, PP. 303-6, ISSN

compounds in embryo transfer media for assisted reproductive technologies.

'clinical touch' for catheter guidance during embryo transfer in women. *Cochrane* 

*technologies: Laboratory and clinical perspectives*. Gardner, D. K., Weissman, A., Howles, C. M., Shoham, Z, PP.693-701, Informa Healthcare, 978-0415448949, United kingdom Coroleu, B., Carreras, O., Veiga, A., Martell, A., Martinez, F., Belil, I., Hereter, L. & Barri, P. N.

(2000). Embryo transfer under ultrasound guidance improves pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization. *Human reproduction,* Vol.15, No.3, PP. 616-20, ISSN 0268-1161 Coroleu, B., Barri, P. N., Carreras, O., Martinez, F., Parriego, M., Hereter, L., Parera, N.,

Veiga, A. & Balasch, J. (2002). The influence of the depth of embryo replacement into the uterine cavity on implantation rates after IVF: a controlled, ultrasound-

for preparation prior to embryo transfer. *Cochrane database of systematic reviews,*


Increasing Pregnancy by Improving Embryo Transfer Techniques 147

Mcnamee, P., Huang, T. & Carwile, A. ( 1998). Significant increase in pregnancy rates

Meldrum, D. R., Chetkowski, R., Steingold, K. A., De Ziegler, D., Cedars, M. I. & Hamilton,

abnormalities. *Fertility and sterility,* Vol.64, No.2, PP. 382-91, ISSN 0015-0282 Neithardt, A. B., Segars, J. H., Hennessy, S., James, A. N. & Mckeeby, J. L. (2005). Embryo

pregnancy. *Fertility and sterility,* Vol.83, No.3, PP. 710-4, ISSN 0015-0282 Niknejadi, M., Ahmadi, F., Zafarani, F., Khalili, G., Ghaderi, F. & Rashidi, Z. (2010).

Poikkeus, P. & Tiitinen, A. (2008). Does single embryo transfer improve the obstetric and

Poindexter, A. N., 3rd, Thompson, D. J., Gibbons, W. E., Findley, W. E., Dodson, M. G. &

Purcell, K. J., Schembri, M., Telles, T. L., Fujimoto, V. Y. & Cedars, M. I. (2007). Bed rest after

Roberts, S., Mcgowan, L., Hirst, W., Brison, D., Vail, A. & Lieberman, B. (2010). Towards

Sauer, M. V. & Paulson, R. J. (1992). Pelvic abscess complicating transcervical embryo

Schoolcraft, W. B., Surrey, E. S. & Gardner, D. K. (2001). Embryo transfer: techniques and

Schulman, J. D. (1986). Delayed expulsion of transfer fluid after IVF/ET. *Lancet,* Vol.1,

Sharif, K., Afnan, M. & Lenton, W. (1995). Mock embryo transfer with a full bladder

Sharif, K., Afnan, M., Lashen, H., Elgendy, M., Morgan, C. & Sinclair, L. (1998). Is bed rest

Simon, A., Safran, A., Revel, A., Aizenman, E., Reubinoff, B., Porat-Katz, A., Lewin, A. &

*technology assessment,* Vol.14, No.38, PP. 1-237, ISSN 1366-5278

*Scandinavica,* Vol.87, No.9, PP. 888-92, ISSN 0001-6349

*sterility,* Vol.46, No.2, PP. 262-7, ISSN 0015-0282

program. *Fertility and sterility,* Vol.48, No.1, PP. 86-93, ISSN 0015-0282 Milliez, J. & Dickens, B. (2009). Legal Aspects of Iatrogenic Multiple Pregnancy. *International journal of Fertility and sterility,* Vol.3, No.2, PP. 84-86, ISSN 2008-0778 Munne, S., Alikani, M., Tomkin, G., Grifo, J. & Cohen, J. (1995). Embryo morphology,

No.Suppl PP. 1:S228,

157-160, ISSN 2008-0778

PP. 1322-6, ISSN 0015-0282

No.8471, PP. 44, ISSN 0140-6736

ISSN 0002-9378

ISSN 0268-1161

ISSN 0015-0282

0282

achieved by vigorous irrigation of endocervical mucus prior to embryo transfer with a Wallace catheter in an IVF-ET program. *Fertility and sterility,* Vol.70

M. (1987). Evolution of a highly successful in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer

developmental rates, and maternal age are correlated with chromosome

afterloading: a refinement in embryo transfer technique that may increase clinical

Diagnostic Accuracy of Transvaginal Sonography in Infertile Patients with Endometrial Polyps. *International journal of Fertility and sterility,* Vol.3, No.4, PP.

neonatal outcome of singleton pregnancy? *Acta obstetricia et gynecologica* 

Young, R. L. (1986). Residual embryos in failed embryo transfer. *Fertility and* 

embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial. *Fertility and sterility,* Vol.87, No.6,

single embryo transfer? Modelling clinical outcomes of potential treatment choices using multiple data sources: predictive models and patient perspectives. *Health* 

transfer. American *journal of obstetrics and gynecology,* Vol.166, No.1 Pt 1, PP. 148-9,

variables affecting success. *Fertility and sterility,* Vol.76, No.5, PP. 863-70, ISSN 0015-

immediately before the real transfer for in-vitro fertilization treatment: the Birmingham experience of 113 cases. *Human reproduction,* Vol.10, No.7, PP. 1715-8,

following embryo transfer necessary? *Fertility and sterility,* Vol.69, No.3, PP. 478-81,

Laufer, N. (2003). Hyaluronic acid can successfully replace albumin as the sole


Hearns-Stokes, R. M., Miller, B. T., Scott, L., Creuss, D., Chakraborty, P. K. & Segars, J. H.

Kan, A. K., Abdalla, H. I., Gafar, A. H., Nappi, L., Ogunyemi, B. O., Thomas, A. & Ola-Ojo,

Lambers, M. J., Dogan, E., Lens, J. W., Schats, R. & Hompes, P. G. (2007). The position of

Lass, A., Williams, G., Abusheikha, N. & Brinsden, P. (1999). The effect of endometrial

Lesny, P., Killick, S. R., Tetlow, R. L., Robinson, J. & Maguiness, S. D. (1998). Embryo

contractions? *Human reproduction,* Vol.13, No.6, PP. 1540-6, ISSN 0268-1161 Lesny, P., Killick, S. R., Robinson, J. & Maguiness, S. D. (1999a). Transcervical embryo

Lesny, P., Killick, S. R., Robinson, J., Raven, G. & Maguiness, S. D. (1999b). Junctional zone

Lewin, A., Schenker, J. G., Avrech, O., Shapira, S., Safran, A. & Friedler, S. (1997). The role

Madani, T., Ashrafi, M., Abadi, A. B. & Kiani, K. (2009a). Appropriate timing of uterine

Madani, T., Ashrafi, M., Jahangiri, N., Abadi, A. B. & Lankarani, N. (2010). Improvement of

Mansour, R., Aboulghar, M. & Serour, G. (1990). Dummy embryo transfer: a technique that

Mansour, R. T., Aboulghar, M. A., Serour, G. I. & Amin, Y. M. (1994). Dummy embryo

Mansour, R. T. & Aboulghar, M. A. (2002). Optimizing the embryo transfer technique.

Mansour, R. (2005). Minimizing embryo expulsion after embryo transfer: a randomized controlled study. *Human reproduction,* Vol.20, No.1, PP. 170-4, ISSN 0268-1161

*Reproductive biomedicine online,* Vol.19, No.5, PP. 734-6, ISSN 1472-6483 Madani, T., Ghaffari, F., Kiani, K. & Hosseini, F. (2009b). Hysteroscopic polypectomy

trial. *Fertility and sterility,* Vol.94, No.6, PP. 2424-6, ISSN 0015-0282

*Human reproduction,* Vol.17, No.5, PP. 1149-53, ISSN 0268-1161

*reproduction and genetics,* Vol.16, No.8, PP. 410-5, ISSN 1058-0468

transfer. Fertility and sterility, Vol.74, No.1, PP. 80-6, ISSN 0015-0282 Isikoglu, M., Berkkanoglu, M., Senturk, Z., Coetzee, K. & Ozgur, K. (2006). Endometrial

*online,* Vol.12, No.2, PP. 199-204, ISSN 1472-6483

*reproduction,* Vol.14, No.5, PP. 1259-61, ISSN 0268-1161

*and sterility,* Vol.88, No.1, PP. 68-73, ISSN 0015-0282

305-9, ISSN 0015-0282

1058-0468

0015-0282

ISSN 0268-1161

Vol.14, No.9, PP. 2367-70, ISSN 0268-1161

No.3, PP. 412-5, ISSN 1472-6483

(2000). Pregnancy rates after embryo transfer depend on the provider at embryo

polyps smaller than 1.5 cm do not affect ICSI outcome. *Reproductive biomedicine* 

O. O. (1999). Embryo transfer: ultrasound-guided versus clinical touch. *Human* 

transferred air bubbles after embryo transfer is related to pregnancy rate. *Fertility* 

polyps on outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. *Journal of assisted* 

transfer--can we learn anything new from the observation of junctional zone

transfer as a risk factor for ectopic pregnancy. *Fertility and sterility,* Vol.72, No.2, PP.

contractions and embryo transfer: is it safe to use a tenaculum? *Human reproduction,*

of uterine straightening by passive bladder distension before embryo transfer in IVF cycles. *Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics,* Vol.14, No.1, PP. 32-4, ISSN

cavity length measurement positively affects assisted reproduction cycle outcome.

without cycle cancellation in IVF cycles. *Reproductive biomedicine online,* Vol.18,

pregnancy rate by modification of embryo transfer technique: a randomized clinical

minimizes the problems of embryo transfer and improves the pregnancy rate in human in vitro fertilization. *Fertility and sterility,* Vol.54, No.4, PP. 678-81, ISSN

transfer using methylene blue dye. *Human reproduction,* Vol.9, No.7, PP. 1257-9,


**10**

*USA* 

**Optimizing Embryo Transfer Outcomes:** 

The past decade has seen increased success rates with assisted reproductive technologies (ART), however, the overall pregnancy and implantation rates have remained relatively low. These low rates continue even though we now have improved stimulation protocols and laboratory techniques. Three areas that have gained specific attention include 1) identification of the optimal uterine environment; 2) extended embryo culture to the blastocyst stage; and 3) the embryo transfer (ET) technique, which has historically been

Discerning the impact on folliculogenesis and the endometrial level is difficult in conventional IVF cycles. Moreover, due to ethical quandaries, any study as complex as embryo and endometrial synchrony and receptivity is difficult to perform and thus reported studies in humans are more suggestive than conclusive. In contrast, the ovum donation model, which has been successfully used in treating infertility for over 25 years (Trounson et al., 1983), allows for the study of isolated parameters that may affect outcome by standardizing for embryo quality and endometrial receptivity and by optimizing the recruitment of high quality oocytes from the egg donor and eliminates the possible adverse

In this chapter we will review the clinical variables that have gained increasing importance as prognostic determinants of implantation and variables to maximize ET outcomes of oocyte donation in an attempt to control for confounding variables seen in

**2. Endometrial thickness and pregnancy outcome in oocyte donation cycles**  To date, significant research has been done to directly assess uterine receptivity including histologic dating, measurement of endometrial sex steroid receptor concentrations using immuno-histochemical methods, assessing pinopod expression through scanning electron microscopy, and more recently the role of cytokines, growth factors, and integrin molecules have been studied (Castelbaum, 1997; Noci, 1995; Noyes, 1950; Paulson, 1997). Although these methods are important in furthering our understanding of uterine receptivity, they are

viewed as an unimportant variable in the success of an ART treatment cycle.

effects of ovarian hyperstimulation (Acosta, 2000; Garcia, 1984; Oehninger, 2008).

**1. Introduction** 

other clinical studies.

not practical in actual ET cycles.

**Determinants for Improved Outcomes**

**Using the Oocyte Donation Model** 

*University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH* 

Alan M. Martinez and Steven R. Lindheim

.

macromolecule in a human embryo transfer medium. *Fertility and sterility*, Vol.79, No.6, PP. 1434-8, ISSN 0015-0282

