**1. Introduction**

184 Technical Problems in Patients on Hemodialysis

[49] Chamney, P.W., Krämer, M, Rode, C., Kleinekofort, W. & Wizemann, V. (2002). A new

[50] Piccoli, A. (1998). Identification of opérational clues to dry weight prescription in

[51] Epstein, B.R. & Foster K.R. (1983). Anisotropy in the dielectric properties of skeletal

[52] Piccoli, A., Pastori, G. & Guizzo, M. (2005). Equivalence of information from single

[53] Zhu, F., Kuhlmann, M.K. & Sarkars, S. (2004). Adjustment of dry weight in

[54] Zhu, F., Leonard, E.F. & Levin, N.W. (2005). Body composition modeling in the calf

[55] Zhu, F.; Schneditz, D., Wang, E. & Levin NW. (1998). Dynamics of segmental

[56] Zhu, F., Kuhlmann, M.K., Kaysen, G.A., Sarkar, S., Kaitwatcharachai, C., Khilnani, R.,

spectroscopy in hemodialysis patients. J Appl Physiol, Vol 100, pp.717-724 [57] Scharfetter, H., Monif, M., Laszlo, Z., Lambauer, T., Hutten, H. & Hinghofer-Szalkay, H.

[58] Chertow, G.M., Lazarus, J.M., Lew, N.L., Ma, L. & Lowrir E.G. (1997). Bioimpedance norms for the hemodialysis population. Kidney Int, Vol 52, pp.1617-1621 [59] Kyle, U.G., Bosaeus, I, De Lorenzo, A;, Deurenberg, P., Elia, M;, Gomez, J.F., Heitmann,

[60] Kyle, U.G., Bosaeus, I, De Lorenzo, A;, Deurenberg, P., Elia, M;, Gomez, J.F., Heitmann,

[61] Jebb, S.A., Cole, T.J., Doman, D., Murgatroyd, P.R. & Prentice, A.M. (2000). Evaluation

with a four-compartment model. British J of Nutr, Vol 83, pp.115-122 [62] Chamney P.W., Wabel, P., Moissl, U.M., Müller, M.J., Bosy-Westphal, A., Korth, O. &

hydration of major body tissues. Am J Clin Nutr, Vol 85, pp.80-89

bioimpedance spectroscopy data. Kidney Int, Vol 51, pp.1078-1087

bioimpedance. Kidney Int, Vol 61, pp.2250-2258

muscle. Med Biol Eng Comp, Vol 21, pp.51-55

of the calf. Int J Artif Organs, Vol 27, pp.104-109

Int, Vol 67, pp.301-313

Physiol Meas, Vol 26, pp.133-143

Appl Physiol, Vol 85, pp.497-504

methods. Clin Nutr, Vol 23, pp.1226-1243

Clin Nutr, Vol 23, pp.1430-1453

technique for establisching dry weight in hemodialysis patients via whole body

hemodialysis using bioimpedance vector analysis. Kidney Int, Vol 53, pp.1036-1043

versus multiple frequency bioimpedance vector analysis in hemodialysis. Kidney

hemodialysis patients using intradialytic continuous multifrequency bioimpedance

using an equivalent circuit model of multi-frequency bioimpedance analysis.

extracellular volumes during changes in body position by bioimpedance analysis. J

Stevens, L., Leonard, E.F., Wang, J., Heymsfield, S. & Levin N.W. (2006). Segmentspecific resistivity improves body fluid volume estimates from bioimpedance

(1997). Effect of postural changes on the reliability of volumes estimations from

B.L., Kent-Smith, L., Malchior, J.C., Pirlich, M., Scharfetter, H., Schols, A. & Pichard, C. (2004). Bioelectrical impedance analysis-part I: review of principles and

B.L., Kent-Smith, L., Malchior, J.C., Pirlich, M., Scharfetter, H., Schols, A. & Pichard, C. (2004). Bioelectrical impedance analysis-part II: utilization in clinical practise.

of the novel Tanita body-fat analyser to measure body composition by comparision

Fuller, N.J. (2007). A whole-body model to distinguish excess fluid from the

The kidneys play a vital role in maintaining normal tissue hydration and serum sodium level. In haemodialysis patients, with impaired or absent kidney function, fluid status is managed by removing excess fluid using ultrafiltration and by restricting dietary sodium intake. Ideally, haemodialysis patients should remain close to normal hydration throughout the interdialytic period, with minimal periods of excessive dehydration or fluid overload and with no fluid–related co-morbidity.

Optimal fluid management is achieved by adjusting the post-dialysis 'target' weight and, where necessary, limiting the fluid gained between dialysis sessions. While clinical history and examination remain the basis for prescribing the target weight, technology can provide useful objective information especially where the clinical indications are ambiguous. A simple non-invasive test can now be carried out when a patient attends for dialysis enabling staff to pick up changes in body composition so that their target weight can be adjusted to maintain optimal fluid status.

In most patients, interdialytic fluid gain (IDFG) is directly related to sodium intake. Acceptable fluid gains can usually be achieved by limiting salt intake to the recommended daily allowance for the general population and avoiding unnecessary sodium loading during dialysis. Low pre-dialysis serum sodium levels can help identify patients with other causes of high IDFG, such as high blood sugar or social drinking, who need additional counselling. For the patients, lowering sodium intake may also improve blood pressure control and reduce requirements for antihypertensive medication. Staff education, and preferably participation, is vital when implementing salt restriction in a haemodialysis unit.
