**1. Introduction**

276 The Dynamical Processes of Biodiversity – Case Studies of Evolution and Spatial Distribution

Serra, R., Braga, A. & Venâncio, A. (2005). Mycotoxin-producing and other fungi isolated

Serra, R., Cabañes, J., Perrone, G., Kozakiewicz, Z., Castellá, G., Venâncio, A. & Mulè, G.

Serra, R., Mendonca, C. & Venâncio, A. (2006). Fungi and ochratoxin A detected in healthy

Susca, A., Proctor, R.H., Mulè, G., Stea, G., Ritieni, A., Logrieco, A. & Moretti, A. (2010).

Tournas, V.H. & Katsoudas, E. (2005). Mould and yeast flora in fresh berries, grapes and

Tjamos, S.E., Antoniou, P.P., Kazantzidou, A., Antonopoulos, D.F., Papageorgiou, I, &

Tjamos, S.E., Antioniou, P.P & Tjamos, E.C. (2006). *Aspergillus* spp., distribution, population

Varga J & Kozakiewicz Z. (2006). Ochratoxin A in grapes and grape-derived products. *Trends in Food Science & Technology,* Vol. 17, pp. 72-81. ISSN 0924-2244 Varga, J., Kocsubé, S., Tóth, B., Frisvad, J.C., Perrone, G., Susca, A., Meijer, M. & Samson,

Vrabcheva, T., Usleber, E., Dietrich, R.& Märtlbauer, E. (2000). Co-occurrence of ochratoxin

Zimmerli, B. & Dick, R. (1996). Ochratoxin A in table wine and grape-juice: occurrence and

*Microbiology,* Vol. 7, pp. 1925-1932, ISSN 1466-5026

*Research in Microbiology,* Vol. 156, pp. 515–521, ISSN 0923-2508

*Food Chemistry*, Vol. 58, No.6, pp. 9266-9272, ISSN 0021-8561

*Mycologia,* Vol. 98, No.2, pp. 295–306, ISSN 0027-5514

0266-8254

1605

ISSN 0931-1785

397–411.

203X

2488, ISSN 0021-8561

from grapes for wine production, with particular emphasis on ochratoxin A.

(2006). *Aspergillus ibericus*: a new species of the Section *Nigri* isolated from grapes.

grapes for wine production. *Letters in Applied Microbiology,* Vol. 42, pp. 42–47, ISSN

Correlation of Mycotoxin Fumonisin B2 Production and Presence of the Fumonisin Biosynthetic Gene *fum8* in *Aspergillus niger* from Grape. *Journal of Agricultural and* 

citrus fruits. *International Journal of Food Microbiology* Vol. 105, pp.11–17, ISNN 0168-

Tjamos, E.C. (2004). *Aspergillus niger* and *Aspegillus carbonarius* in Corinth raisin and wine–producing vineyards in Greece: population composition, ochratoxin A production and chemical control. *Journal of Phytopathology, Vol.* 152:, pp. 250–255,

composition an ochratoxin A production in wine producing vineyards in Greece. *International Journal of Food Microbiology,* Vol. 111, pp. S61–S66, ISNN 0168-1605 Varga, J., Kevei F., Hamari, Z., Toth, B., Teren, J., Croft, J.H. & Kozakiewicz, Z. (2000).

Genotypic and phenotypic variability among black aspergilli. In: Samson RA, Pitt JI, eds. Integration of modern taxonomic methods for *Penicillium* and *Aspergillus* classification. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Harwood Academic Publishers. pp.

R.A. (2007). *Aspergillus brasiliensis* sp. nov., a biseriate black *Aspergillus* species with world-wide distribution. *International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary* 

A and citrinin in cereals from Bulgarian villages with a history of Balkan endemic nepropathy. *Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,* Vol. 48, (2000), pp. 2483–

risk assessment. *Food Additives and Contaminants,* Vol. 13, pp. 655–668, ISNN 0265-

Thinking of the diversity of the microbial world most readers will focus their attention to the bacteria and archea. However, among most of the ecosystems present on Earth, such as soil or intestine of animals, another microbial group has established: the yeasts. Their biodiversity has been hardly investigated although they possess probably as much adaptation potential as bacteria, considering the enormous differences between the habitats and the challenges the different ecosystems must face.

In the chapter the authors would like to provide to the reader the state of the art in the field of intestinal yeast research, with focus on the diversity of the yeasts in the gastrointestinal tract of animals – insects and mammals. Up to date there are about 1,500 yeast species known, belonging to two phyla *Ascomycota* (Suh et al., 2006a) and *Basidiomycota* (Fell et al., 2000; Scorzetti et al., 2002) of the Dikarya subkingdom (Kurtzman & Fell, 2006). These unicellular fungi are considered as ubiquitous microorganisms, which can be found in a vast variety of different ecological systems associated with terrestrial and underwater flora and fauna (Rosa & Peter, 2006). Nevertheless, based on the currently researches it could be suggested that only 1% of the diversity of yeast species has been described yet (Kurtzman & Fell, 2006).

The gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of animals remains a largely unexplored habitat. Most of the yeasts were isolated from the GIT of beetles and other insects. The current knowledge about yeasts' diversity in the digestive tract of vertebrates, especially of farm animals, is still based generally on the findings from 50's and 70's of the XXth Century. Furthermore, the taxonomy of yeasts undergoes continuous revision, e.g., variety of yeasts has double names or even many synonyms. This came off due to the fact that sometimes the same yeasts have been described by different scientists (Kurtzman & Fell, 1998) or several yeasts were invalidly classified, e.g., species assigned to genus *Torulopsis* were reclassified to the genus *Candida* (Yarrow & Meyer, 1978). Moreover, it transpires frequently when yeast species previously described based on its phenotypic characteristics has been later phylogenetically analysed and on that basis reclassified into another genus, consequently obtained a new name (Kurtzman & Fell, 2006). Therefore, few yeast species will be mentioned in the further sections with a double name.

Furthermore, in this review we will provide some consideration to the importance of the yeasts for the host. Advantages and disadvantages of the contemporary methods used for diversity studies will also be pointed.

Biodiversity of Yeasts in the Gastrointestinal

*Candida aglyptinia* 

*Candida amphixiae* 

*Candida anneliseae* 

*Candida ascalaphidarum* 

*Candida atakaporum* 

*Candida athensensis* 

*Candida barrocoloradensis*

sp. nov.

sp. nov.

sp. nov.

sp. nov.

sp. nov.

sp. nov.

sp. nov.

sp. nov.

sp. nov.

sp. nov.

sp. nov.

*Candida blattae*  sp. nov.

*Candida blattariae* 

*Candida bohiensis* 

*Candida bokatorum* 

*Candida bolitotheri* 

*Candida atbi*  sp. nov.

*Candida alai*  sp. nov.

Ecosystem with Emphasis on Its Importance for the Host 279

*Ambrosiozyma monospora* owlfly (*Ascalaphidae*) (Nguyen et al., 2007) *Aureobasidium pullulans* leaf beetles (*Chrysomelidae*) (Molnar et al., 2008)

darkling beetle (*Tenebrionidae*); sap-

pleasing fungus beetles (*Erotylidae*); darkling beetles (*Tenebrionidae*); rove beetle (*Staphylinidae*); false darkling beetles (*Melandryidae*); clown beetle (*Histeridae*); minute tree-fungus

feeding beetle (*Nitidulidae*)

*Candida arabinofermentans* bark beetles (*Scolytinae*) (Rivera et al., 2009)

owlfly (*Ascalaphidae*); largus bug (*Largidae*); fungus weevil

beetles: cucujoid, curculionid, *Megalodacne fasciata* (*Erotylidae*)

cockroach (*Blattidae*); dobsonfliy

click beetles (*Elateridae*); leaf beetle

pleasing fungus beetles (*Erotylidae*); ground beetle (*Carabidae*); sap-feeding beetle (*Nitidulidae*); false darkling beetle (*Melandryidae*); darkling beetle

darkling beetles (*Tenebrionidae*); pleasing fungus beetle (*Erotylidae*)

handsome fungus beetle

(*Endomychidae*)

beetle (*Ciidae*)

(*Anthribidae*)

(*Corydalidae*)

(*Chrysomelidae*)

(*Tenebrionidae*)

round fungus beetle (*Leiodidae*) (Suh et al., 2006b)

click beetle (*Elateridae*) (Suh et al., 2008)

pleasing fungus beetle (*Erotylidae*) (Suh et al., 2004b)

sap-feeding beetles (*Nitidulidae*) (Suh et al., 2006b)

sap-feeding beetles (*Nitidulidae*) (Suh et al., 2006b)

cockroach (*Blattaria*) (Suh et al., 2005b)

(Suh et al., 2004b)

(Suh et al., 2005b)

(Suh et al., 2004b)

(Nguyen et al., 2007)

(Suh & Blackwell,

(Nguyen et al., 2007)

(Suh et al., 2008)

(Suh et al., 2004b)

(Suh et al., 2004b)

2004)

**Species Host organism References** 

*Candida ambrosiae* pleasing fungus beetle (*Erotylidae*);
