**Part 5**

**Post Traumatic Stress Disorder** 

346 Neuroimaging for Clinicians – Combining Research and Practice

Thompson, W.L., Kosslyn, S.M., Hoffman, M.S., & van Der Kooij, K. (2008). Inspecting

Tiggemann, M., & Kemps, E. (2005). The phenomenology of food cravings: The role of

Tomasino, B., Werner, C.J., Weiss, P.H., & Fink, G.R. (2007). Stimulus properties matter

Tyszka, J.M., Grafton, S.T., Chew, W., Woods, R.P. & Colletti, P.M. (1994). Parceling of

Watson, J., Myers, R., Frackowiak, R., Hajnal, J., Woods, R., Mazziotta, J., Shipp, S., & Zeki,

Yoo, S.S., Freeman, D.K., McCarthyll, J.J. & Jolesz, F.A. (2003). Neural substrates of tactile

Yoo, S.S., Lee, C.U., & Choi, B.G. (2001). Human brain mapping of auditory imagery: An

Zatorre, R.J., Halpern, A.R., & Bouffard, M. (2010). Mental reversal of imagined melodies: A

Zelano, C., Montag, G., Khan, R., & Sobel, N. (2009). A specialized odor memory buffer in

502X

6663

1994), pp.746-749, ISSN 0364-5134

585, ISSN 0959-4965

1932-6203

pp.3045–3049, ISSN 0959-4965

(April 2010), pp.775-89, ISSN 0898-929X

Vol.3, No.2, (April 1993), pp.79–94, ISSN 1047-3211

visual mental images: Can people "see" implicit properties as easily in imagery and perception? *Memory & Cognition*, Vol.36, No.5, (July 2008), pp.1024-1032, ISSN 0090-

mental imagery. *Appetite*, Vol.45, No.3, (December 2005), pp.305–313, ISSN 0195-

more than perspective: An fMRI study of mental imagery and silent reading of action phrases. *NeuroImage*, Vol.36, No.2, (March 2007), pp.128-141, ISSN 1053-8119

mesial frontal motor areas during ideation and movement using functional magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla. *Annual Neurolology*, Vol.35, No.6, (June

S. (1993). Area V5 of the human brain: Evidence from a combined study using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. *Cerebral Cortex*,

imagery: A functional MRI study. *NeuroReport*, Vol.14, No.4, (March 2003), pp.581-

event-related functional MRI study. *NeuroReport*, Vol.12, No.14, (October 2001),

role for the posterior parietal cortex. *Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience*, Vol.22, No.4,

primary olfactory cortex. *PLoS ONE*, Vol.4, No.3, (March 2009), pp.e4965, ISSN

**17** 

George S. Gericke *BioSequences (Pty) Ltd,* 

*South Africa* 

**Stress Shaping Brains:** 

**of the Brain Transcriptome** 

**Higher Order DNA/Chromosome Mechanisms** 

*"I believe there is little reason to question the presence of innate systems that are able to restructure a genome. It is now necessary to learn of these systems and to determine why many of them are quiescent and remain so over very long periods of time only to be triggered into action by forms of stress, the consequences of which vary according to the nature of the challenge to be met". Barbara* 

Attempts to link specific neurobehavioural phenotypes with causative genes, a necessary step preceding the development of highly specific neuroimaging biomarkers for these phenotypes, have been spectacularly unsuccessful, although numerous significant gene candidates emerged during the process. Various family study approaches, including twin studies, sib pairs, 'trios' and so-called 'pure multiplex pedigrees' excluding comorbid disorders have been employed in various linkage and association study designs to determine the genes and proteins underlying the relevant disorders. Some genomewide association studies surprised investigators with the information that, when initially promising genomic coding region hotspots were supersaturated with markers at increasingly closer map distances, the results showed weakening of signals in targeted exonic areas, possibly indicating an influence outside these coding areas. The importance of epigenetics (including increasingly complex regulatory region and RNA metabolism gene expression-modifying mechanisms), gradually emerged during the course of molecular genetic 'brain and behaviour' studies. "Epigenetics is defined as mitotically or meiotically stable molecular processes that regulate genome activity independent of DNA sequence. The term 'heritable' has been included in the definition, but has been omitted recently since this implies generational inheritance by definition and therefore does not include all elements of epigenetics (Skinner, 2011). The brain represents a particular area of interest with regard to epigenetics, where it has been demonstrated that epigenetic modifications are not static, but dynamically change in response to external stimuli including synaptic activity (Crepaldi & Riccio, 2009). The increasing likelihood of the role played by transgenerational epigenetic influences in neurogenetics studies now also impacts on the tracking of neuropsychiatric disorder gene candidates in families, implying a requirement for analyses of both coding as well as noncoding polymorphisms and the manner in which these interact,

**1. Introduction** 

*Mc Clintock, (1978), as cited in (Jorgensen, 2004).* 

**Underlying Epigenetic Programming** 
