**3. Central pain and cold allodynia**

Cold allodynia is often associated with central pain even though it is not found in the majority of patients with CPSP (Table 1). The expression of cold allodynia is variable, which suggests that there is more than one mechanism for cold allodynia in different patients. In our recent study of seven patients with isolated parietal and/or insular lesions, 4/7 patients had cold allodynia based on thresholds, but only two of these had central pain and clinical cold hyperalgesia based on increased ratings of a painful cold waterbath stimulus (Veldhuijzen et al., 2009). Overall, these results suggest that posterior insular/retroinsular lesions in isolation can lead to cold allodynia as assessed by clinical, threshold and suprathreshold measures.

The matter is further complicated by differences in cold allodynia measured by different QST techniques. Cold allodynia can be evoked by touching the patient with a cool object, such as metal, at room temperature. In this case, the obligatory tactile stimulus may contribute to allodynia sensation, particularly in subjects with tactile allodynia. During QST, cold allodynia is often measured by thresholds for cold pain using a probe which is held on the skin while the temperature decreases until the patient reports pain perception. Surprisingly, the pain with a cold object contact often does not correspond to the pain evoked by the contact probe at the same temperature.

These phenomena have been observed in an early study which reported that 5/22 central pain patients had clinical cold allodynia but none had cold allodynia as measured with a contact temperature probe (Boivie et al., 1989). A similar observation was made in a more recent study (see Table 1). In the same study, 2 patients showed increased sensitivity to cold pain by thresholds, which met experimental criteria for cold allodynia, but the patients did not exhibit cold allodynia during clinical exams.

#### **3.1 Ongoing pain**

454 Neuroimaging – Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience

asymmetrical thermosensory deficits than those without allodynia. The intensity of the spontaneous burning pain was correlated with the degree of thermal sensory loss. Additionally, thermal deficits were less severe in patients with cold allodynia compared to those with tactile allodynia. Therefore, the pattern of thermal sensory loss may differentially

Another study of SCI secondary to syringomyelia compared diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and electrophysiological potentials between patients with and without neuropathic pain and healthy controls (Hatem et al., 2010). Among those SCI patients with neuropathic pain, higher average daily pain intensity correlated with the extent of structural damage to the spinal cord tracts. Additionally, the number of intact nerve axons within the whole spinal cord was inversely correlated with deep spontaneous pain and dysaesthesias. Patients with both spontaneous and evoked pain had less structural spinal cord damage by morphological and electrophysiological criteria compared to patients with only spontaneous pain. Therefore, in patients with SCI there was strong evidence that the extent of structural lesions is strongly correlated with the expression of spontaneous and evoked pain, or

Based on the sample of 30 central pain patients (mostly CPSP) evaluated with QST at our research center, we found no relationship between the extent of thermosensory loss (based on cool or warm thresholds), and the level of ongoing pain. Therefore, thermal hypoesthesia

Cold allodynia is often associated with central pain even though it is not found in the majority of patients with CPSP (Table 1). The expression of cold allodynia is variable, which suggests that there is more than one mechanism for cold allodynia in different patients. In our recent study of seven patients with isolated parietal and/or insular lesions, 4/7 patients had cold allodynia based on thresholds, but only two of these had central pain and clinical cold hyperalgesia based on increased ratings of a painful cold waterbath stimulus (Veldhuijzen et al., 2009). Overall, these results suggest that posterior insular/retroinsular lesions in isolation can lead to cold allodynia as assessed by clinical, threshold and

The matter is further complicated by differences in cold allodynia measured by different QST techniques. Cold allodynia can be evoked by touching the patient with a cool object, such as metal, at room temperature. In this case, the obligatory tactile stimulus may contribute to allodynia sensation, particularly in subjects with tactile allodynia. During QST, cold allodynia is often measured by thresholds for cold pain using a probe which is held on the skin while the temperature decreases until the patient reports pain perception. Surprisingly, the pain with a cold object contact often does not correspond to the pain

These phenomena have been observed in an early study which reported that 5/22 central pain patients had clinical cold allodynia but none had cold allodynia as measured with a contact temperature probe (Boivie et al., 1989). A similar observation was made in a more recent study (see Table 1). In the same study, 2 patients showed increased sensitivity to cold pain by thresholds, which met experimental criteria for cold allodynia, but the patients did

may manifest differently in patients with different etiologies of central pain.

influence different features of central pain.

hypersensitivity (Hatem et al., 2010).

**3. Central pain and cold allodynia** 

evoked by the contact probe at the same temperature.

not exhibit cold allodynia during clinical exams.

suprathreshold measures.

No relation between the size or location of a lesion and the presence or intensity of central pain has been found, although CP requires an impairment of thermosensory pathways or nociceptive pathways or both (see Table 1) (Boivie et al., 1989;Leijon et al., 1989;Andersen et al., 1995;Vestergaard et al., 1995;Greenspan et al., 2004;Lewis-Jones et al., 1990). In addition, studies of patients with central pain secondary to SCI show that the spinothalamic tract is not differentially affected in pain-free patients as opposed to patients with ongoing central pain (Ducreux et al., 2006;Finnerup et al., 2003). Therefore, lesions involving the spinothalamic pathway and its cortical connections, while necessary, are not sufficient to explain the development of central pain.

In a large series of patients (n=270) investigated for somatosensory abnormalities following stroke, five subjects were identified that presented with central pain and pure thermoalgesic sensory loss contralateral to the cortical stroke. All of these patients had involvement of the posterior insula and inner parietal operculum. Lemniscal sensory modalities and somatosensory evoked potentials to non-noxious inputs were preserved, while thermal and pain sensations were profoundly altered, and laser-evoked potentials were abnormal in all (Garcia-Larrea et al., 2010).

The nature of neural abnormalities in central pain is poorly understood. It has been proposed that thalamic bursting (low-threshold spike or LTS pattern) occurs at a higher rate among neurons in the region of the Ventral caudal (Vc) nucleus in patients with central pain as opposed to those with movement disorders (Jeanmonod et al., 1996;Lenz et al., 1989;Lenz et al., 1994). Another report found no difference in the thalamic burst rate between patients with chronic pain as opposed to those with movement disorder (Radhakrishnan et al., 1999). In the latter report, most of the neuronal recordings were made outside Vc in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain rather than central pain. Thus, this latter report does not speak directly to the mechanism of central pain. Electrical stimulation in the area of Vc evoked pain more commonly in central pain patients with allodynia, versus those without allodynia (Lenz et al., 1998;Davis et al., 1996). Overall, these studies suggest that reorganization of the region of Vc contributes to the symptoms of central pain.

In a study of MR spectroscopy, concentrations of markers for neurons (N-acetyl aspartate, NA) and glial cells (myo-inositol, Ins) in the thalamus were significantly different between patients with versus without central pain after SCI (Pattany et al., 2002;Stanwell et al., 2010). NA concentrations and NA/Ins ratios were lower in patients with pain versus those without, while Ins concentrations were higher for pain patients. In addition, NA concentrations were inversely correlated with VAS pain intensity, and Ins was directly correlated with pain intensity in the pain group. These results suggest that in SCI patients, dysfunction or loss of thalamic neurons is greater among SCI patients with central pain than among those without.

A recent study of SCI patients used a sophisticated wavelet-based analysis of the entire MRS signal to identify differences between SCI patients and intact controls, and between SCI patients with versus without central pain (DiPiero et al., 1991;Hsieh et al., 1995;Iadarola et al., 1995). Signals from the thalamus best discriminated between SCI patients and intact controls, yet signals from regions of the anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex, but not the thalamus, highly discriminated between SCI patients with versus without central pain. While such an approach cannot identify the specific molecular differences, it does reveal which brain regions exhibit neurochemical differences that relate specifically to neuropathic central pain.

Neuroimaging studies of CP patients have most often reported thalamic hypoactivity, but some have observed thalamic hyperactivity. PET (positron emission tomography) studies

Deconstructing Central Pain with Psychophysical and Neuroimaging Studies 457

affected side but not when it was applied to the unaffected side. These structures included: the primary sensory and motor cortex (contralateral to stimulation), the lateral thalamus (contralateral to stimulation), inferior parietal lobule (bilateral), and the frontal inferior gyrus. Notably, allodynic stimulation failed to evoke responses in medial thalamus or the portion of the ACC associated with pain. This study, then, did not support the model of disinhibition of the medial nociceptive processing system, but rather supported an amplification of the lateral

A single subject PET study of a patient with central pain resulting from an infarct of the thalamus revealed a dramatic increase in sensory and motor cortical activation contralateral to allodynic cold stimulation of the affected hand (Kim et al., 2007). These increases may indicate disruption of a modulatory effect of the insula upon sensorimotor cortex which occurs in the normal brain. A study of two patients with large insular lesions but without central pain found that activation of S1 cortex ipsilateral to the lesioned insula was

Cold allodynia was associated with BOLD (blood oxygen level dependent) activation in the posterior insula, ACC, bilateral anterior insula, inferior parietal cortex, and supplementary motor cortex contralateral to the stimulus, and in the ipsilateral frontal gyrus of patients with syringomyelia (Ducreux et al., 2006). Brain activation in response to cold allodynic stimulation was much greater than usually evoked by the normally innocuous stimulus, and was comparable to the activation evoked by painful stimuli in controls without sensory abnormality. As noted above, a PET study of patients with Wallenburg strokes did not find activation of the ACC in response to stimuli which produced allodynia (Peyron et al., 1998), although such activation is often found in response to acute pain stimuli in healthy controls (Apkarian et al., 2005;Lenz et al., 2010). A combined PET and fMRI study of a unique patient with strokes of both the ACC and parietal cortex demonstrated cold allodynia, in the

In contrast, one fMRI study of a patient with CPSP resulting from a stroke of the posterolateral thalamus and adjacent internal capsule found activation of the ACC, the posterior parietal cortex, and the putamen during allodynia evoked by a cool stimulus (Seghier et al., 2005). Another fMRI study examined cold allodynia in normal controls evoked by cutaneous application of menthol, which rendered the skin hypersensitive to normally non-painful cold stimuli (Seifert and Maihofner, 2007). Stimulation of the sensitized skin was compared with the same intensity evoked by a normal cold pain stimulus. The pain evoked during allodynia resulted in more activation in dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex, bilateral anterior insula, and in parts of the brainstem. This range of results limits our ability to understand the mechanism of

Tactile hypoesthesia and allodynia are common features of central pain as measured by use of von Frey hairs and camel hair brushes. Hypoesthesia for tactile sensation are associated with lesions of the dorsal columns, while such sensory loss is not found with lesions of the

One recent study provided the first evidence that A-beta fibers are involved in dynamic mechanical allodynia (Landerholm and Hansson, 2010) In a portion of the central pain patients, dynamic allodynia occurred during a compression nerve block transitioning to a sensation of dysethesia. The remaining patients transitioned directly to the absence of allydynia following the block. In a subset of patients with central pain, concurrent changes in cold, but not warm, perception were found indicating A-delta involvement as well.

dramatically increased in response to painful heat stimulation (Starr et al., 2009).

nociceptive processing system as a basis for central pain allodynia.

absence of hyperactivity in the remaining ACC (Peyron et al., 2000).

cold allodynia in terms of structures in the brain, particularly the ACC.

**3.3 Mechanisms of tactile allodynia in patients with central pain** 

STT which spare the dorsal columns (Finnerup et al., 2007).

have found a decrease in thalamic cerebral blood flow (CBF) on the same side as the lesion in patients with central pain patients at rest (Ness et al., 1998). The spatial resolution of these studies does not permit identification of the specific thalamic nuclei which were involved. This decrease in activity could be reversed by stimulation of the motor cortex (Peyron et al., 1995), or therapeutic intravenous infusion of lidocaine (Cahana et al., 2004). A similar decrease in thalamic bloodflow has been reported in patients with central and peripheral neuropathic pain combined. Specifically, the thalamus opposite the affected body region had lower bloodflow than the thalamus on the same side as the affected region in patients with SCI and central pain (Lenz et al., 2010). However, a single photon emission CT (SPECT) study found bilateral increased thalamic metabolism associated with pain of high intensity, but decreased blood flow associated with pain of low intensity (Cesaro et al., 1991).

Finally, PET results from CP patients show decreased thalamic bloodflow in both medial and lateral thalamus. Both SPECT and PET studies demonstrate increased thalamic activity contralateral to stimulation of the allodynic sites compared to non-allodynic sites in CPSP patients with or without unilateral allodynia (Lenz et al., 2010). The brain metabolic and bloodflow differences estimated by PET or SPECT reflect both inhibitory and excitatory synaptic activity. Therefore, decreased thalamic bloodflow in patients with CP might reflect decreased inhibitory synaptic activity, which may be related to loss of neurons, as suggested by the MR spectroscopy study reviewed above (Fukumoto et al., 1999). This decrease in bloodflow could occur despite the increased spontaneous thalamic firing rates, since spontaneous activity may not be reflected in metabolic or bloodflow imaging studies of the brain.

It is also possible these results are due to adaptive changes in the thalamus following the inciting lesion. For example, in patients with complex regional pain syndrome a SPECT study found increased thalamic bloodflow in patients with symptoms at 3 to 7 months after the injury, while decreased bloodflow occurred with long-term symptoms (24–36 months after) (Fukumoto et al., 1999).

Finally, ongoing pain in patients with CP might be related to changes in the opiodergic intrinsic modulatory system. These patients show decreased binding of the non-selective opioid binding ligand, diprenorphine, versus healthy controls, which indicate higher levels of binding sites occupied by opioids originating in the brain's intrinsic opioid system (Willoch et al., 2004). These reductions in opioid receptor binding within the "medial nociceptive system" were most pronounced in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Brodmann area 10), anterior cingulate cortex (Brodmann area 24), insular cortex, and the medial thalamus. There were also reductions in binding in the lateral nociceptive system including the inferior parietal cortex (Brodmann area 40). Similar but more extensive decreases in binding were found in a study which included parietal cortex, cingulate and midbrain gray matter; these decreases were independent of the lesion locus which caused CP (Head and Holmes, 1911).

#### **3.2 Mechanisms of cold allodynia in patients with central pain**

An often cited hypothesis of cold allodynia suggests that it is the result of disinhibition of the medial nociceptive system following disruption of the lateral nociceptive system (Lenz et al., 2010). An approximate version of this hypothesis was proposed long ago (Head and Holmes, 1911), but the more recent version proposes that the medial system (ACC and medial thalamus) is critical to the mechanism of both central pain and cold allodynia.

This hypothesis was tested by a PET study which reported the bloodflow activity resulting from cutaneous stimulation with a cool, tactile stimulus (ice in a plastic container) in patients with central pain due to lateral medullary stroke (Wallenberg) syndrome (Peyron et al., 1998). This stimulus produced differential activation of structures contralateral to the

have found a decrease in thalamic cerebral blood flow (CBF) on the same side as the lesion in patients with central pain patients at rest (Ness et al., 1998). The spatial resolution of these studies does not permit identification of the specific thalamic nuclei which were involved. This decrease in activity could be reversed by stimulation of the motor cortex (Peyron et al., 1995), or therapeutic intravenous infusion of lidocaine (Cahana et al., 2004). A similar decrease in thalamic bloodflow has been reported in patients with central and peripheral neuropathic pain combined. Specifically, the thalamus opposite the affected body region had lower bloodflow than the thalamus on the same side as the affected region in patients with SCI and central pain (Lenz et al., 2010). However, a single photon emission CT (SPECT) study found bilateral increased thalamic metabolism associated with pain of high intensity, but

Finally, PET results from CP patients show decreased thalamic bloodflow in both medial and lateral thalamus. Both SPECT and PET studies demonstrate increased thalamic activity contralateral to stimulation of the allodynic sites compared to non-allodynic sites in CPSP patients with or without unilateral allodynia (Lenz et al., 2010). The brain metabolic and bloodflow differences estimated by PET or SPECT reflect both inhibitory and excitatory synaptic activity. Therefore, decreased thalamic bloodflow in patients with CP might reflect decreased inhibitory synaptic activity, which may be related to loss of neurons, as suggested by the MR spectroscopy study reviewed above (Fukumoto et al., 1999). This decrease in bloodflow could occur despite the increased spontaneous thalamic firing rates, since spontaneous activity

It is also possible these results are due to adaptive changes in the thalamus following the inciting lesion. For example, in patients with complex regional pain syndrome a SPECT study found increased thalamic bloodflow in patients with symptoms at 3 to 7 months after the injury, while decreased bloodflow occurred with long-term symptoms (24–36 months

Finally, ongoing pain in patients with CP might be related to changes in the opiodergic intrinsic modulatory system. These patients show decreased binding of the non-selective opioid binding ligand, diprenorphine, versus healthy controls, which indicate higher levels of binding sites occupied by opioids originating in the brain's intrinsic opioid system (Willoch et al., 2004). These reductions in opioid receptor binding within the "medial nociceptive system" were most pronounced in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Brodmann area 10), anterior cingulate cortex (Brodmann area 24), insular cortex, and the medial thalamus. There were also reductions in binding in the lateral nociceptive system including the inferior parietal cortex (Brodmann area 40). Similar but more extensive decreases in binding were found in a study which included parietal cortex, cingulate and midbrain gray matter; these decreases were

An often cited hypothesis of cold allodynia suggests that it is the result of disinhibition of the medial nociceptive system following disruption of the lateral nociceptive system (Lenz et al., 2010). An approximate version of this hypothesis was proposed long ago (Head and Holmes, 1911), but the more recent version proposes that the medial system (ACC and medial thalamus) is critical to the mechanism of both central pain and cold allodynia. This hypothesis was tested by a PET study which reported the bloodflow activity resulting from cutaneous stimulation with a cool, tactile stimulus (ice in a plastic container) in patients with central pain due to lateral medullary stroke (Wallenberg) syndrome (Peyron et al., 1998). This stimulus produced differential activation of structures contralateral to the

decreased blood flow associated with pain of low intensity (Cesaro et al., 1991).

may not be reflected in metabolic or bloodflow imaging studies of the brain.

independent of the lesion locus which caused CP (Head and Holmes, 1911).

**3.2 Mechanisms of cold allodynia in patients with central pain** 

after) (Fukumoto et al., 1999).

affected side but not when it was applied to the unaffected side. These structures included: the primary sensory and motor cortex (contralateral to stimulation), the lateral thalamus (contralateral to stimulation), inferior parietal lobule (bilateral), and the frontal inferior gyrus. Notably, allodynic stimulation failed to evoke responses in medial thalamus or the portion of the ACC associated with pain. This study, then, did not support the model of disinhibition of the medial nociceptive processing system, but rather supported an amplification of the lateral nociceptive processing system as a basis for central pain allodynia.

A single subject PET study of a patient with central pain resulting from an infarct of the thalamus revealed a dramatic increase in sensory and motor cortical activation contralateral to allodynic cold stimulation of the affected hand (Kim et al., 2007). These increases may indicate disruption of a modulatory effect of the insula upon sensorimotor cortex which occurs in the normal brain. A study of two patients with large insular lesions but without central pain found that activation of S1 cortex ipsilateral to the lesioned insula was dramatically increased in response to painful heat stimulation (Starr et al., 2009).

Cold allodynia was associated with BOLD (blood oxygen level dependent) activation in the posterior insula, ACC, bilateral anterior insula, inferior parietal cortex, and supplementary motor cortex contralateral to the stimulus, and in the ipsilateral frontal gyrus of patients with syringomyelia (Ducreux et al., 2006). Brain activation in response to cold allodynic stimulation was much greater than usually evoked by the normally innocuous stimulus, and was comparable to the activation evoked by painful stimuli in controls without sensory abnormality. As noted above, a PET study of patients with Wallenburg strokes did not find activation of the ACC in response to stimuli which produced allodynia (Peyron et al., 1998), although such activation is often found in response to acute pain stimuli in healthy controls (Apkarian et al., 2005;Lenz et al., 2010). A combined PET and fMRI study of a unique patient with strokes of both the ACC and parietal cortex demonstrated cold allodynia, in the absence of hyperactivity in the remaining ACC (Peyron et al., 2000).

In contrast, one fMRI study of a patient with CPSP resulting from a stroke of the posterolateral thalamus and adjacent internal capsule found activation of the ACC, the posterior parietal cortex, and the putamen during allodynia evoked by a cool stimulus (Seghier et al., 2005). Another fMRI study examined cold allodynia in normal controls evoked by cutaneous application of menthol, which rendered the skin hypersensitive to normally non-painful cold stimuli (Seifert and Maihofner, 2007). Stimulation of the sensitized skin was compared with the same intensity evoked by a normal cold pain stimulus. The pain evoked during allodynia resulted in more activation in dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex, bilateral anterior insula, and in parts of the brainstem. This range of results limits our ability to understand the mechanism of cold allodynia in terms of structures in the brain, particularly the ACC.

#### **3.3 Mechanisms of tactile allodynia in patients with central pain**

Tactile hypoesthesia and allodynia are common features of central pain as measured by use of von Frey hairs and camel hair brushes. Hypoesthesia for tactile sensation are associated with lesions of the dorsal columns, while such sensory loss is not found with lesions of the STT which spare the dorsal columns (Finnerup et al., 2007).

One recent study provided the first evidence that A-beta fibers are involved in dynamic mechanical allodynia (Landerholm and Hansson, 2010) In a portion of the central pain patients, dynamic allodynia occurred during a compression nerve block transitioning to a sensation of dysethesia. The remaining patients transitioned directly to the absence of allydynia following the block. In a subset of patients with central pain, concurrent changes in cold, but not warm, perception were found indicating A-delta involvement as well.

Deconstructing Central Pain with Psychophysical and Neuroimaging Studies 459

The cortical regions associated with central pain can vary considerably among studies and symptoms of central pain. A recent study has suggested that CPSP occurred only in individuals with lesions including posterior insula/retroinsula, which spare the anterior and posterior parietal cortex (Veldhuijzen et al., 2009). Evidence from neuroimaging studies suggests that the parietal lobe is involved in the mechanism of CPSP and CPSP-associated allodynia in subjects with strokes of the lateral medulla (Wallenberg syndrome)(Peyron et al., 1998), and the thalamic nucleus Vc which projects to the parietal cortex (Kim et al., 2007). In both studies, a combined cold and mechanical cutaneous stimulus produced allodynia, and was associated with intense bloodflow activation of contralateral sensorimotor (frontal and parietal) cortex. In addition, pain sensations are evoked in subjects with CPSP by electrical stimulation of S1 cortex (Katayama et al., 1994;Nguyen et al., 2000;Brown and Barbaro, 2003) or of thalamic nucleus Vc, which projects to it (Lenz et al., 1998;Davis et al., 1996). Lesions of parietal cortex can dramatically relieve pain in subjects with CPSP resulting from thalamic lesions (Soria and Fine, 1991;Helmchen et al., 2002;Canavero and Bonicalzi, 2007). Consideration of these observations suggests the hypothesis that a network of insular and sensorimotor cortex is specifically disrupted in central pain, leading to increased activity in

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health – National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS38493 and NS40059 to FAL NS-39337 to JDG). We

Andersen P, Vestergaard K, Ingeman-Nielsen M, Jensen TS (1995) Incidence of post-stroke

Apkarian AV, Bushnell MC, Treede R-D, Zubieta JK (2005) Human brain mechanisms of

Boivie J, Leijon G, Johansson I (1989) Central post-stroke pain--a study of the mechanisms through analyses of the sensory abnormalities. *Pain*, pp. 37:173-185. Bowsher D (1997) Central pain: clinical and physiological characteristics. J Neurol

Brown JA, Barbaro NM (2003) Motor cortex stimulation for central and neuropathic pain:

Cahana A, Carota A, Montadon ML, Annoni JM (2004) The long-term effect of repeated

Canavero S, Bonicalzi V (2007) *Central Pain Syndrome: Pathophysiology, diagnosis and* 

Cesaro P, Mann MW, Moretti JL, Defer G, Roualdes B, Nguyen JP, Degos JD (1991) Central

Davis KD, Kiss ZHT, Tasker RR, Dostrovsky JO (1996) Thalamic stimulation-evoked

tomography measurements. *Anesth Analg*, 98, pp. 1581-4, table.

pain perception and regulation in health and disease. *European Journal of Pain,* 9, pp.

intravenous lidocaine on central pain and possible correlation in positron emission

pain and thalamic hyperactivity: a single photon emission computerized

sensations in chronic pain patients and nonpain (movement disorder) patients. *J* 

sensorimotor cortex, particularly with respect to the expression of allodynia.

thank C. Cordes and L. H. Rowland for excellent technical assistance.

central pain. *Pain,* 61, pp. 187-193.

Neurosurg Psychiatry 61:62-69.

current status. *Pain*, pp. 104:431-435.

*management.* NY, NY.: Cambridge Press.

tomographic study. *Pain* 47, pp. 329-336.

*Neurophysiol* 75, pp. 1026-1037.

**5. Acknowledgement** 

463-484.

**6. References** 

In contrast, tactile allodynia was more often associated with normal tactile thresholds than with tactile hypoesthesia in a study of CPSP patients (Hofbauer et al., 2006). Therefore, tactile allodynia may be the result of abnormal forebrain processing of signals transmitted through a relatively intact dorsal column – medial lemniscal system. This is consistent with reports of dysesthesias, which can be evoked by activation of afferents projecting through the dorsal column – medial lemniscal pathway in patients with post-stroke dysesthesias, a variation of CPSP (Triggs and Beric, 1994).

Cortical activation associated with tactile allodynia has been examined in experimental allodynia and peripheral neuropathic pain. A study of experimental allodynia resulting from application of capsaicin treatment in normal volunteers found that S1 and S2 activation occurred during nonpainful stimulation using von Frey filaments (Lorenz et al., 2002). When stimulating the area with mechanical allodynia, significant activation was found in the prefrontal cortex, as well as middle and inferior frontal gyri. There was no activation of the ACC.

In a patient with peripheral neuropathic pain after a peroneal nerve injury ongoing burning pain and tactile allodynia were observed; tactile stimuli evoked a deep pain, despite decreased tactile sensation (Hofbauer et al., 2006). Tactile allodynic sensations of the involved foot were compared with brush stimulation of the non-involved foot, and were associated with higher BOLD signals in S2, ipsilateral anterior insula, and ACC. Increased BOLD signals in S1 or ipsilateral posterior insula were not associated with stimulation of the involved foot, although such increased signals were observed after stimulation of the non-involved foot.

In a group of patients with complex regional pain syndrome, mechanical stimulation of the involved side evoked hyperalgesia and larger than control BOLD signals in several painrelated brain regions, including contralateral S1, bilateral S2, bilateral insula, inferior parietal lobule, and widespread ACC (Maihofner and Handwerker, 2005). Allodynia to a moving brush stimulus has also been studied in patients with traumatic peripheral nerve injury of the extremities, who suffered from ongoing pain and tactile allodynia (Witting et al., 2006). In these patients, allodynia in the affected limb yielded higher bloodflow than in the nonaffected limb in contralateral orbitofrontal cortex and ipsilateral anterior insular cortex. Brushing of normal skin in the mirror image of the allodynic area produced a distinctly different pattern with increased bloodflow in contralateral S1 and posterior parietal cortex.

One imaging study has examined BOLD activation by tactile allodynia in patients with central pain secondary to syringomyelia (Ducreux et al., 2006). Tactile allodynia evoked by repeated brushing with a soft brush produced a pattern of brain activation distinct from that produced in normal controls with the same brushing, or with cold allodynic stimulation in these same patients. In all groups, activation was observed in the contralateral S1 and S2, and in parietal association areas. Tactile allodynia specific BOLD activation was elicited in the contralateral thalamus, bilateral middle frontal gyrus, and supplementary motor area, but was not observed in the insula or in the anterior and middle cingulate cortexes.

#### **4. Conclusions**

Based upon the data available today, it is not possible to draw any more than tentative conclusions. A frequent observation from PET and SPECT studies is that of thalamic hypometabolism in the painful resting state. At the same time, allodynic stimulation can evoke a stronger thalamic signal than normal. Both observations can be explained by a partially denervated thalamus and by a major disruption of GABA-mediated inhibition (Rausell et al., 1992). There is also some evidence that dysfunction of the thalamic nucleus Vc is involved in the mechanism of central pain (Montes et al., 2005;Kim et al., 2007).

The cortical regions associated with central pain can vary considerably among studies and symptoms of central pain. A recent study has suggested that CPSP occurred only in individuals with lesions including posterior insula/retroinsula, which spare the anterior and posterior parietal cortex (Veldhuijzen et al., 2009). Evidence from neuroimaging studies suggests that the parietal lobe is involved in the mechanism of CPSP and CPSP-associated allodynia in subjects with strokes of the lateral medulla (Wallenberg syndrome)(Peyron et al., 1998), and the thalamic nucleus Vc which projects to the parietal cortex (Kim et al., 2007). In both studies, a combined cold and mechanical cutaneous stimulus produced allodynia, and was associated with intense bloodflow activation of contralateral sensorimotor (frontal and parietal) cortex. In addition, pain sensations are evoked in subjects with CPSP by electrical stimulation of S1 cortex (Katayama et al., 1994;Nguyen et al., 2000;Brown and Barbaro, 2003) or of thalamic nucleus Vc, which projects to it (Lenz et al., 1998;Davis et al., 1996). Lesions of parietal cortex can dramatically relieve pain in subjects with CPSP resulting from thalamic lesions (Soria and Fine, 1991;Helmchen et al., 2002;Canavero and Bonicalzi, 2007). Consideration of these observations suggests the hypothesis that a network of insular and sensorimotor cortex is specifically disrupted in central pain, leading to increased activity in sensorimotor cortex, particularly with respect to the expression of allodynia.

#### **5. Acknowledgement**

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health – National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS38493 and NS40059 to FAL NS-39337 to JDG). We thank C. Cordes and L. H. Rowland for excellent technical assistance.

#### **6. References**

458 Neuroimaging – Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience

In contrast, tactile allodynia was more often associated with normal tactile thresholds than with tactile hypoesthesia in a study of CPSP patients (Hofbauer et al., 2006). Therefore, tactile allodynia may be the result of abnormal forebrain processing of signals transmitted through a relatively intact dorsal column – medial lemniscal system. This is consistent with reports of dysesthesias, which can be evoked by activation of afferents projecting through the dorsal column – medial lemniscal pathway in patients with post-stroke dysesthesias, a

Cortical activation associated with tactile allodynia has been examined in experimental allodynia and peripheral neuropathic pain. A study of experimental allodynia resulting from application of capsaicin treatment in normal volunteers found that S1 and S2 activation occurred during nonpainful stimulation using von Frey filaments (Lorenz et al., 2002). When stimulating the area with mechanical allodynia, significant activation was found in the prefrontal cortex, as well as

In a patient with peripheral neuropathic pain after a peroneal nerve injury ongoing burning pain and tactile allodynia were observed; tactile stimuli evoked a deep pain, despite decreased tactile sensation (Hofbauer et al., 2006). Tactile allodynic sensations of the involved foot were compared with brush stimulation of the non-involved foot, and were associated with higher BOLD signals in S2, ipsilateral anterior insula, and ACC. Increased BOLD signals in S1 or ipsilateral posterior insula were not associated with stimulation of the involved foot, although

In a group of patients with complex regional pain syndrome, mechanical stimulation of the involved side evoked hyperalgesia and larger than control BOLD signals in several painrelated brain regions, including contralateral S1, bilateral S2, bilateral insula, inferior parietal lobule, and widespread ACC (Maihofner and Handwerker, 2005). Allodynia to a moving brush stimulus has also been studied in patients with traumatic peripheral nerve injury of the extremities, who suffered from ongoing pain and tactile allodynia (Witting et al., 2006). In these patients, allodynia in the affected limb yielded higher bloodflow than in the nonaffected limb in contralateral orbitofrontal cortex and ipsilateral anterior insular cortex. Brushing of normal skin in the mirror image of the allodynic area produced a distinctly different pattern with increased bloodflow in contralateral S1 and posterior parietal cortex. One imaging study has examined BOLD activation by tactile allodynia in patients with central pain secondary to syringomyelia (Ducreux et al., 2006). Tactile allodynia evoked by repeated brushing with a soft brush produced a pattern of brain activation distinct from that produced in normal controls with the same brushing, or with cold allodynic stimulation in these same patients. In all groups, activation was observed in the contralateral S1 and S2, and in parietal association areas. Tactile allodynia specific BOLD activation was elicited in the contralateral thalamus, bilateral middle frontal gyrus, and supplementary motor area,

variation of CPSP (Triggs and Beric, 1994).

**4. Conclusions** 

middle and inferior frontal gyri. There was no activation of the ACC.

such increased signals were observed after stimulation of the non-involved foot.

but was not observed in the insula or in the anterior and middle cingulate cortexes.

Vc is involved in the mechanism of central pain (Montes et al., 2005;Kim et al., 2007).

Based upon the data available today, it is not possible to draw any more than tentative conclusions. A frequent observation from PET and SPECT studies is that of thalamic hypometabolism in the painful resting state. At the same time, allodynic stimulation can evoke a stronger thalamic signal than normal. Both observations can be explained by a partially denervated thalamus and by a major disruption of GABA-mediated inhibition (Rausell et al., 1992). There is also some evidence that dysfunction of the thalamic nucleus


Deconstructing Central Pain with Psychophysical and Neuroimaging Studies 461

Kim JH, Greenspan JD, Coghill RC, Ohara S, Lenz FA (2007) Lesions limited to the human

Landerholm AH, Hansson PT (2010) Mechanisms of dynamic mechanical allodynia and dysesthesia in patients with peripheral and central neuropathic pain. *Eur J Pain*. Leijon G, Boivie J, Johansson I (1989) Central post-stroke pain-neurological symptoms and

Lenz FA, Casey KL, Jones EG, Willis WDJr (2010) *The Human Pain System: Experimental and* 

Lenz FA, Gracely RH, Baker FH, Richardson RT, Dougherty PM (1998) Reorganization of

Lenz FA, Kwan HC, Dostrovsky JO, Tasker RR (1989) Characteristics of the bursting pattern

Lenz FA, Kwan HC, Martin R, Tasker R, Richardson RT, Dostrovsky JO (1994)

Lewis-Jones H, Smith T, Bowsher D, Leijon G (1990) Magnetic Resonance Imaging In 36

Lorenz J, Cross D, Minoshima S, Morrow T, Paulson P, Casey K (2002) A unique representation of heat allodynia in the human brain. *Neuron* 35, pp. 383-393. Maihofner C, Handwerker HO (2005) Differential coding of hyperalgesia in the human

Montes C, Magnin M, Maarrawi J, Frot M, Convers P, Mauguiere F, Garcia-Larrea L (2005)

Nguyen JP, Lefaucheur JP, Le Guerinel C, Eizenbaum JF, Nakano N, Carpentier A, Brugieres

Ohara S, Weiss N, Hua S, Anderson W, Lawson C, Greenspan JD, Crone NE, Lenz FA (2004)

central pain: electrophysiological and PET study. *Pain* 62, pp. 275-286. Peyron R, Garcia-Larrea L, Gregoire MC, Convers P, Lavenne F, Veyre L, Froment JC,

(Wallenberg) infart: a PET study. *Brain* 121, pp. 345-356.

Thalamic thermo-algesic transmission: ventral posterior (VP) complex versus VMpo in the light of a thalamic infarct with central pain. *Pain* 113, pp. 223-232. Ness TJ, San Pedro EC, Richards JS, Kezar L, Liu HG, Mountz JM (1998) A case of spinal

cord injury-related pain with baseline rCBF brain SPECT imaging and beneficial

P, Pollin B, Rostaing S, Keravel Y (2000) Motor cortex stimulation in the treatment

Allodynia due to forebrain sensitization demonstrated by thalamic microstimulation. In: Hyperalgesia: molecular mechanisms and clinical implications (Brune K, Handwerker HO, eds), pp 353-371. Seattle: IASP Press. Pattany PM, Yezierski RP, Widerstrom-Noga EG, Bowen BC, Martinez-Arizala A, Garcia BR,

Quencer RM (2002) Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the thalamus in patients with chronic neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury. *Am J Neuroradiol* 23, pp. 901-905. Peyron R, Garcia-Larrea L, Deiber MP, Cinotti L, Convers P, Sindou M, Mauguiere F,

Laurent B (1995) Electrical stimulation of precentral cortical area in the treatment of

Mauguiere F, Michel D, Laurent B (1998) Allodynia after lateral-medullary

of cold sensations and central pain. *J Neurosci* 27, pp. 4995-5004.

*Clinical Perspectives.* NY, NY: Cambridge University Press.

pain characteristics. *Pain*, 36, pp. 13-25.

transection. *J Neurophysiol* 72, pp. 1570-1587.

Merskey H (1986) Classification of chronic pain. *Pain* S1-S220.

response to gabapentin. *Pain* 78, pp. 139-143.

Cases Of Central Post-Stroke Pain (CPSP).*Pain.* pp S278.

brain: a functional MRI study. *Neuroimage* 28, pp. 996-1006.

of central and neuropathic pain. *Arch Med Res,* 31, pp. 263-265.

399, pp. 125-138.

*Res* 496, pp. 357-360.

thalamic principal somatosensory nucleus (ventral caudal) are associated with loss

sensory modalities evoked by microstimulation in region of the thalamic principal sensory nucleus in patients with pain due to nervous system injury. *J Comp Neurol*

of action potentials that occurs in the thalamus of patients with central pain. *Brain* 

Characteristics of somatotopic organization and spontaneous neuronal activity in the region of the thalamic principal sensory nucleus in patients with spinal cord


DiPiero V, Jones AKP, Iannotti F, Powell M, Lenzi GL, Frackowiak RSJ (1991) Chronic pain:

Ducreux D, Attal N, Parker F, Bouhassira D (2006) Mechanisms of central neuropathic pain: a combined psychophysical and fMRI study in syringomyelia. *Brain* 129, pp. 963-976. Finnerup NB, Johannesen IL, Fuglsang-Frederiksen A, Bach FW, Jensen TS (2003) Sensory

Finnerup NB, Sorensen L, Biering-Sorensen F, Johannesen IL, Jensen TS (2007) Segmental

Fukumoto M, Ushida T, Zinchuk VS, Yamamoto H, Yoshida S (1999) Contralateral thalamic

Garcia-Larrea L, Perchet C, Creac'h C, Convers P, Peyron R, Laurent B, Mauguiere F,

Greenspan JD, Lee RR, Lenz FA (1999) Pain sensitivity alterations as a function of lesion

Greenspan JD, Ohara S, Sarlani E, Lenz FA (2004) Allodynia in patients with post-stroke

Greenspan JD, Treede RD, Tasker RR, Lenz FA (2008) Central pain states. In: *Bonica's* 

Hatem SM, Attal N, Ducreux D, Gautron M, Parker F, Plaghki L, Bouhassira D (2010)

Head H, Holmes G (1911) Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions. *Brain* 34, pp. 102-254. Helmchen C, Lindig M, Petersen D, Tronnier V (2002) Disappearance of central thalamic

Hofbauer RK, Olausson HW, Bushnell MC (2006) Thermal and tactile sensory deficits and

Hsieh JC, Belfrage M, Stone-Elander S, Hansson P, Ingvar M (1995) Central representation of

Iadarola MJ, Max MB, Berman KF, Byas-Smith MG, Coghill RC, Gracely RH, Bennett GJ

Jeanmonod D, Magnin M, Morel A (1996) Low-threshold calcium spike bursts in the human

Katayama Y, Tsubokawa T, Yamamoto T (1994) Chronic motor cortex stimulation for central

magnetic resonance imaging study. *Clin J Pain*, 22, pp. 104-108.

pp. 9-12.

57-70.

207, pp. 139-149.

syndrome. *Brain* 133, pp. 2528-2539.

individuals. *Pain* 109, pp. 357-366.

*Brain* 133, pp. 3409-3422.

63, pp. 225-236.

NY:NY: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkens.

brain stimulation. *Pain.* 98, pp. 325-330.

chronic neuropathic pain. *Pain,* 63, pp. 55-64.

syndrome. *Stereotact Funct Neurosurg* 62, pp. 295-299.

symptoms. *Brain* 119, pp. 363-375.

location in the parasylvian cortex. *Pain* 81, pp. 273-282.

1790-1791.

A PET study of the central effects of percutaneous high cervical cordotomy. *Pain* 46,

function in spinal cord injury patients with and without central pain. *Brain* 126, pp.

hypersensitivity and spinothalamic function in spinal cord injury pain. *Exp Neurol* 

perfusion in patients with reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome. *Lancet* 354, pp.

Magnin M (2010) Operculo-insular pain (parasylvian pain): a distinct central pain

central pain (CPSP) studied by statistical quantitative sensory testing within

*Management of Pain* (Fishman SM, Ballantyne JC, Rathmell JC, eds), pp 357-384.

Clinical, functional and structural determinants of central pain in syringomyelia.

pain syndrome after contralateral parietal lobe lesion: implications for therapeutic

allodynia in a nerve-injured patient: a multimodal psychophysical and functional

chronic ongoing neuropathic pain studied by positron emission tomography. *Pain,*

(1995) Unilateral decrease in thalamic activity observed with PET in patients with

thalamus. Common physiopathology for sensory, motor and limbic positive

deafferentation pain: experience with bulbar pain secondary to Wallenberg


Peyron R, Garcia-Larrea L, Gregoire MC, Convers P, Richard A, Lavenne F, Barral FG,

Rausell E, Cusick CG, Taub E, Jones EG (1992) Chronic deafferentation in monkeys

Seifert F, Maihofner C (2007) Representation of cold allodynia in the human brain--a

Soria ED, Fine EJ (1991) Disappearance of thalamic pain after parietal subcortical stroke.

Stanwell P, Siddall P, Keshava N, Cocuzzo D, Ramadan S, Lin A, Herbert D, Craig A, Tran

Starr CJ, Sawaki L, Wittenberg GF, Burdette JH, Oshiro Y, Quevedo AS, Coghill RC (2009)

Treede RD, Jensen TS, Campbell JN, Cruccu G, Dostrovsky JO, Griffin JW, Hansson P,

system for clinical and research purposes. *Neurology*, 70, pp. 1630-1635. Triggs WJ, Beric A (1994) Dysaesthesiae induced by physiological and electrical activation of posterior column afferents after stroke. *J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry*, 57, pp. 1077-1080. Veldhuijzen DS, Greenspan JD, Coghill RC, Treede RD, Kim JH, Ohara S, Lenz FA (2007) Imaging central pain syndromes. *Curr Pain Headache Rep* 11, pp. 183-189. Veldhuijzen DS, Greenspan JD, Kim JH, Lenz FA (2009) Altered pain and thermal sensation

resonance imaging (fMRI) study of an unusual case. *Pain,* 84, pp. 77-87. Radhakrishnan V, Tsoukatos J, Davis KD, Tasker RR, Lozano AM, Dostrovsky JO (1999) A

non-pain patients. *Pain*, 80, pp. 567-575.

functional MRI study. *Neuroimage* 35, pp. 1168-1180.

pain. *J Pain* 6, pp. 208-212.

*Neuroimage* 53, pp. 544-552.

*Neurosci* 29, pp. 2684-2694.

Light AR, eds), NY, NY.

stroke pain. *Pain* 61, pp. 177-186.

e535-e11.

*Pain.* 44, pp. 285-288.

Mauguiere F, Michel D, Laurent B (2000) Parietal and cingulate processes in central pain. A combined positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic

comparison of the burst activity of lateral thalamic neurons in chronic pain and

differentially affects nociceptive and nonnociceptive pathways distinguished by specific calcium-binding proteins and down-regulates gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptors at thalamic levels. *Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A* 89, pp. 2571-2575. Seghier ML, Lazeyras F, Vuilleumier P, Schnider A, Carota A (2005) Functional magnetic

resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging in a case of central poststroke

Y, Middleton J, Gautam S, Cousins M, Mountford C (2010) Neuro magnetic resonance spectroscopy using wavelet decomposition and statistical testing identifies biochemical changes in people with spinal cord injury and pain.

Roles of the insular cortex in the modulation of pain: insights from brain lesions. *J* 

Hughes R, Nurmikko T, Serra J (2008) Neuropathic pain: redefinition and a grading

in subjects with isolated parietal and insular cortical lesions. *Eur J Pain* 14:e535-e1-

Neuroimaging tell us about Central Pain? In: *Chronic Pain Syndromes.* (Kruger L,

(1995) Sensory abnormalities in consecutive unselected patients with central post-

(2004) Central poststroke pain and reduced opioid receptor binding within pain processing circuitries: a [11C]diprenorphine PET study. *Pain*' 108, pp. 213-220. Witting N, Kupers RC, Svensson P, Jensen TS (2006) A PET activation study of brushevoked allodynia in patients with nerve injury pain. *Pain*, 120, pp. 145-154.

Veldhuijzen DS, Lenz FA, Lagraize SC, Greenspan JD (2011) What (if anything) can

Vestergaard K, Nielsen J, Andersen G, Ingeman-Nielsen M, Arendt-Nielsen L, Jensen TS

Willoch F, Schindler F, Wester HJ, Empl M, Straube A, Schwaiger M, Conrad B, Tolle TR
