**Self-Assembled Colloidal Substrates for Nanofabrication**

50 Advances in Unconventional Lithography

Sauer, H. ; Rahimi, G. ; Hescheler, J. & Wartenberg, M. (1999). Effects of electrical fields on

Sauer, H. ; Bekhite, M.M. ; Hescheler, J. & Wartenberg, M. (2005). Redox control of

Spitzer, N.C. ; Root, C.M. & Borodinsky, L.N. (2004). Orchestrating neuronal differentiation :

Takayama, Y. ; Moriguchi, H. ; Saito, A. ; Kotani, K. & Jimbo, Y. (2009). Ensemble

Tang, K. ; Yang, J. ; Gao, X. ; Wang, C. ; Liu, L. ; Kitani, H. ; Atsumi, T. & Jing, N. (2002).

Wilson, P.A. & Hemmati-Brivanlou, A. (1995). Induction of epidermis and inhibition of

Yamada, M. ; Tanemura, K. ; Okada, S. ; Iwanami, A. ; Nakamura, M. ; Mizuno, H. ; Ozawa,

*Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering*, Vol.4, 734-735.

neural face by Bmp-4, *Nature*, Vol.376, 331-333.

embryonic stem cells, *Stem Cells*, Vol.25, 562-570.

*Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications*, Vol. 293, 167-173. Wang, W ; Itaka, K. ; Ohba, S. ; Nishiyama, N ; Chung, U. ; Yamasaki, Y. & Kataoka, K.

*Biochemistry*, Vol.75, 710-723.

Vol.304, 380-390.

No.7, 415-421.

Vol.30, 2705-2715.

cardiomyocyte differentiation of embryonic stem cells, *Journal of Cellular* 

angiogenic factors and CD31-positive vessel-like structures in mouse embryonic stem cells after direct current electrical field stimulation, *Experimental Cell Research*,

patterns of Ca2+ spikes specify transmitter choice, *Trends in Neuroscience*, Vol.27,

stimulation of embryoid bodies using substrate-embedded electrodes, *IEEJ* 

Wnt-1 promotes neuronal differentiation and inhibits gliogenesis in P19 cells,

(2009) 3D spheroid culture system on micropatterned substrates for improved differentiation efficiency of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells, *Biomaterials*,

M. ; Ohyama-Goto, R. ; Kitamura, N. ; Kawano, M. ; Tan-Takeuchi, K. ; Ohtsuka, C. ; Miyawaki, A. ; Takashima, A. ; Ogawa, M. ; Toyama, Y. ; Okano, H. & Kondo, T. (2007). Electrical stimulation modulated fate determination of differentiating

**4** 

*Belgium* 

**Fabrication of Surfaces** 

Yasmine Adriaensen and Paul G. Rouxhet

*Université Catholique de Louvain* 

**with Bimodal Roughness Through** 

Christine C. Dupont-Gillain\*, Cristèle J. Nonckreman,

*Institute of Condensed Matter and Nanosciences - Bio & Soft Matter,* 

From bioengineering to optics and electronics, a great deal of work has been conducted on the development of new materials with structured surfaces. A large range of methods has been used, such as plasma etching, electron beam and colloidal lithography (Denis et al., 2002), electrical deposition (Yang et al., 2009), phase separation (Dekeyser et al., 2004) and polyelectrolyte assembly in order to produce structured surfaces (Agheli et al., 2006). The combination of different methods is also more and more explored. Schaak et al. (2004) described a simple approach to achieve colloidal assembly on a patterned template obtained

Densely packed layers of colloidal particles can be produced by lifting a substrate vertically from a suspension (Fustin et al., 2004; Li J. et al., 2007) or by spin coating (Yang et al., 2009). Colloidal lithography utilizes the ability of particles to adhere on oppositely charged surfaces (Johnson & Lenhoff, 1996; Hanarp et al., 2001, 2003)), possibly using surface modification by inorganic or organic polyelectrolytes. The surface coverage is influenced by several factors: ionic strength, particle size and time. The adhesion of microbial cells on various substrates was also achieved by surface treatments with inorganic or organic polycations (Changui et al., 1987; Van haecht et al., 1985) or with positively charged colloidal particles (Boonaert et al., 2002). A review on colloidal lithography and biological

Adsorption of polyelectrolytes is influenced by ionic strength, pH and the polyelectrolyte characteristics (molecular mass, charge density) (Lindquist & Stratton, 1976; Davies et al., 1989; Choi & Rubner, 2005). At low ionic strength, highly charged polyelectrolytes adopt extended conformations and are fairly rigid due to the strong repulsion between charged units. The maximum adsorbed amount and the adsorbed layer thickness do not vary markedly according to molecular weight. As the salt concentration is increased and the electrostatic intrachain repulsion is decreased, the polyelectrolyte becomes more coiled. In this case, the maximum amount adsorbed (expressed in mass) increases as a function of molecular weight (Roberts, 1996; Lafuma, 1996; Claesson et al., 2005; Boonaert et al., 1999). Build up of polyelectrolyte films may be achieved using layer-by-layer assembly through alternating adsorption of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes (Decher & Hong, 1991).

**1. Introduction** 

by lithography.

applications was published recently (Wood, 2007).

**Polyelectrolyte/Colloid Assembly** 
