**5. References**


considered low compared to other research. This is because the value of kinetic parameter μmax and K is dependent on each other. High value of K could lower down the value of μmax and vice versa. However the value of μmax reported in this research is still within acceptable

A kinetic model for studying the anaerobic digestion process of banana stem waste was proposed on the basis of the two-stages process data obtained. The two-stages system comprising two bioreactors for acidogenic and methanogenic phases respectively. The experiments were conducted with hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 9 d corresponding to organic loading rate (OLR) of 4 gTS/l.d. The parameters obtained represent and predict the activity of the mixed culture in the biogas production of this waste. Kinetic evaluation of the experimental data provided μmax(maximum microorganism growth rate) and K(kinetic constant) values as 0.111 d-1 and 0.330 g/g respectively based on COD. The waste

APHA. (1989). *Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 17th Edition,*

Bal, A.S. & Dhagat, N.N. (2001). Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket Reactor—A Review.

Batstone, D.J.; Keller, J.; Angelidaki, I.; Kalyuzhnyi, S.; Pavlostathis, S.; Rozzi, A.; Sanders,

Borja, R.; Mart´n, A.; Alonso, V.; Garc´a, I. & Banks, C.J. (1995). Influence Of Different

Borja, R.; Raposo, F.; Sánchez, E. & Martín, A. (2005). A Kinetic Evaluation of The Anaerobic

Chen, Y. & Hashimoto, A.G. (1978). Kinetic of Methane Fermentation. *Biotechnol. Bioeng*. Vol.

Chen, Y. R.; Varel, V. H. & Hashimoto, A.G. (1980). Methane Production from Agricultural Residues. A Short Review, *J. Ind. Eng. Chem*. Vol. 19, No. 12, pp. 471. Faisal, M. & Unno, H. (2001). Kinetic Analysis of Palm Oil Mill Wastewater Treatment by A

Gavala, H. N.; Skiadas, I. V.; Bozinis, N. A. & Lyberatos, G. (1996). Anaerobic Codigestion

Gunaseelan, V. N. (2004). Biochemical Methane Potential of Fruits and Vegetable Solid

Waste Feedstocks. *Biomass and Bioenergy,* Vol. 26, pp. 389 – 399.

W.; Siegrist, H. & Vavilin, V. (2002). The IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No1.

Aerobic Pretreatments On The Kinetics of Anaerobic Digestion of Olive Mill

Digestion of Two-Phase Olive Mill Effluent in Batch Reactors. *Journal of Chemical* 

Modified Anaerobic Baffled Reactor. *Biochemical Engineering Journal,* Vol. 9, No. 1,

Of Agricultural Industries Wastewaters. *Water Science and Technology,*Vol. 34, No.

biodegradability (B0) was graphically evaluated to be 0.326 l methane/g COD.

American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.

*Technology and Biotechnology*, Vol. 80, No. 3, pp. 241–250.

*Indian J Environ Health, Vol.* 43, No. 2, pp. 1–82.

*Wat. Sci. Tech.* Vol. 45, No. 10, pp. 63-73.

Wastewater. *Water Res.,* Vol. 29, pp. 489–495.

range.

**4. Conclusion** 

**5. References** 

8, pp. 269-282.

pp. 25-31.

11, pp. 67-75.


Zhao, H. W. & Viraraghavan, T. (2004). Analysis of The Performance of An Anaerobic Digestion System at The Regina Wastewater Treatment Plant. *Bioresource Technology*, Vol. 95, No. 3, pp. 301-307.

Zhao, H. W. & Viraraghavan, T. (2004). Analysis of The Performance of An Anaerobic

*Technology*, Vol. 95, No. 3, pp. 301-307.

Digestion System at The Regina Wastewater Treatment Plant. *Bioresource* 
