**2. Materials and methods**

#### **2.1 Prisma**

Based on pertinent PRISMA, or Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and thematic Analyses, guidelines, a systematic review was created. The PRISMA guidelines were created to aid researchers in enhancing the reporting of systematic reviews and to prevent a number of writing errors that could be misunderstood and result in unintentional bias [30, 31]. PRISMA is also appropriate for the management field [32].

#### **2.2 Resources**

Scopus was used to conduct a search of publications' electronic literature. The primary database used for the review is Scopus. Physical sciences, social sciences, health sciences, and biological sciences are only a few of the many disciplines covered by Scopus. Data may be easily seen, compared, and exported thanks to Scopus analytics tools.

#### **2.3 Systematic review process**

Identification, screening, and eligibility are the three key phases in a systematic review of the literature (refer to **Figure 1**).

#### **2.4 Identification**

The keywords to be used in the search procedure were determined in the first phase. Identification is the process of looking up every possible synonym, phrase connected to it, and variation for the study's primary keywords. It seeks to provide the chosen database with extra possibilities for looking up additional relevant articles to review. The study topic as proposed by Okoli [33] served as the basis for the development of the keywords, which were then identified using an online thesaurus, keywords from previous studies, keywords from Scopus, and keywords recommended by experts. On the main database, Scopus, the authors were able to expand upon the already existing keywords and create a comprehensive search string based on Boolean
