**7. Conclusion**

From the relatively brief discussion above, the following conclusions can be drawn:

	- a.A crash program is needed in preparing the map prior to the preparation of the RDTR and other RTRs that BIG should prepare.
	- b.In preparing the RDTR in a crash program, it is better to use the guidelines for preparing the RDTR which are also adjusted so that the process has a larger proportion in the technical process, and it is necessary to reduce the number of FGDs, although not eliminate them.
	- c.It is advisable that the KLHS preparation process does not have to be included in the RDTR and other RTR preparation processes, but is made in a separate process whose implementation domain is within the Ministry of Forestry and Environment and its related staff in the regions. Meanwhile, the results of the KLHS process can be used in the process of reviewing spatial planning products (RTR), including RDTR.

*Planning Innovation in the Preparation of the Detailed Spatial Plan DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.111838*

