A Brief Review of Blade Surface Icing Adhesive Theories for Wind Turbines

*He Shen and Yan Li*

## **Abstract**

In cold and humid areas, ice easily accumulates on the blade surface of the wind turbine. The icing on the blade surface causes the power efficiency of wind turbines to decline, even leading to safety accidents. In order to research and develop efficient anti-icing and de-icing technologies, exploring the adhesive properties between ice and the blade surface is necessary. Therefore, in this paper, the main theories of the icing adhesive mechanism have been briefly summarized, including mechanical, electronic, and wetting theories, from the aspechts of theory and experimental research, which can provide a reference for researching icing mechanisms and the development of anti-icing and de-icing technologies for wind turbines.

**Keywords:** wind energy, wind turbine, blade airfoil, icing, adhesive theory

## **1. Introduction**

Wind energy is one of the renewable energies of the best successful commercial operation. However, ice easily accumulates on the blade surface in cold and humid areas. An icing example of the wind turbine operating in Northeast China is shown in **Figure 1**. Icing affects the output power and the safe operation of wind turbines, causing severe economic loss and security risks to the power grid [1, 2]. Therefore, to research and develop efficient anti-icing and de-icing systems, the icing mechanism must be explored [3, 4].

The icing research of wind turbine mainly draws lessons from that of aircraft, including aerodynamics and heat transfer theory, etc. As is shown in **Figure 2**, the supercooled droplets impact the blade's surface following air movement [5]. The energy exchange occurs among droplets, blades, and flow field. The droplets freeze into ice in the phase transition and accumulate on the blade surface. This process can be obtained by numerical simulation or icing test [6]. However, there is a problem in the icing process needing to go a step further to explore, which is the icing mechanism. Therefore, in this chapter, some literature has been consulted, the significant theories of the icing mechanism have been briefly summarized, which can provide a reference for researching icing mechanisms and the development of anti-icing and deicing technologies for wind turbines.

**Figure 1.** *An example of icing on wind turbines.*

**Figure 2.** *Schematic diagram of water droplets impacting a blade [5].*

### **2. Overview of adhesion theories**

Adhesion is a complex phenomenon related to the interaction of physics and chemistry from microscale to macroscale [7]. According to the research of Schultz and Nardin, the main adhesion theories are listed as follows: mechanical interlocking, electronic or electrostatic theory, adsorption (thermodynamic) or wetting theory, diffusion theory, chemical (covalent) bonding theory, and theory of weak boundary layers and interphases [8]. In contrast, Fourche [9] separated mechanical adhesion from specific adhesion, the latter including the subcategories of the electronic model, diffusion model, thermodynamic adsorption or wetting model, rheological model, chemical adhesion model, and the model of weak boundary layers. Although the classification and naming of Schultz and Fourche differ, their depiction of the main theories is similar. This chapter considered that mechanical theory and other adhesion theories explain the adhesive properties from different angles. The decision to separate mechanical theory from other adhesion theories is arbitrary. Therefore, this chapter uses the classification method of Schultz and Nardin to discuss adhesion theories.

At present, adhesion theories are applied to the research of icing mechanisms, mainly including mechanical, electronic, and wetting theories. The following part of this chapter will focus on mechanical, electronic, and wetting theories. The mechanical theory holds that adhesion results from mechanical interlocking between ice and the microscopic feature of the substrate surface. According to electronic theory, adhesion is generated by the double electron layer on the interface between ice and substrate surface. The wetting theory argues that the adhesion between the ice and the substrate surface depends on the wettability of the substrate surface [7, 8]. The above theories are not mutually exclusive. In the icing process, those mechanisms may occur simultaneously, depending on the specific conditions.

### **3. Mechanical theory**

The mechanical theory is one of the oldest theories. In 1925, McBain and Hopkins first proposed the concept of "mechanical adhesive" in "On adhesive and adhesive action." [8]. The mechanical theory holds that the substrate surface is uneven. On the microscale, the surface topography of substrate is similar to that of terrain. Many peaks and valleys of different shapes are randomly distributed on the substrate surface. When water freezes on the substrate surface, the peaks and valleys are like tiny dowels to bond the ice with the substrate. The schematic diagram of the mechanical adhesive mechanism is shown in **Figure 3** [9].

According to mechanical theory, the substrate surface is rougher, the ice adhesion strength is stronger. However, the mechanical theory does not consider the wettability of the substrate surface. The above assumption is valid under the premise of complete wetting of the substrate surface, as shown in **Figure 3a**. Conversely, there will exist many defects on the interface between ice and substrate, as shown in **Figure 3b**.

For mechanical theory, scholars such as Fortin, Knuth, and Shen explored the icing mechanism. In addition, some scholars, such as Chaudhury and Kim [10], have studied the elastic modulus, which is an important parameter affecting ice adhesive strength. The model of Fortin and Perron [11] is established based on the behavior of water before and after freezing, substrate roughness, and the type of ice. The model assumes that the ice near the freezing point is affected by internal and external strain, and its cohesive strength corresponds to the failure stress. The failure stress is related

**Figure 3.**

*The schematic diagram of the mechanical adhesive mechanism. (a) Complete wetting state. (b) Incomplete wetting state [9].*

to the grain size and creep of grain boundary sliding in polycrystalline substrates at elevated temperatures. The ice adhesion shear stress on the substrate with only a single level of roughness is expressed as Eq. (1) [11].

$$\sigma\_{\rm{adh}} = \begin{cases} \left( a\_{\rm{ice}} \left( \frac{\chi\_{\rm{oxygen}} - \chi\_{\rm{engine}}}{\chi\_{\rm{raypn}} - \chi\_{\rm{nitrogen}}} \right)^{2} \frac{T\_{\rm{f}} - T}{T\_{\rm{f}} - T\_{\rm{ref}}} \frac{4 \chi\_{\rm{LV}}}{\delta\_{0}} \\ \quad \times \left[ f\_{\rm{RMS}} + \frac{\delta\_{0}}{\kappa} \left( 1 - f\_{\rm{RMS}} \right) \left( 1 - f\_{\rm{crm{m}p}} \right) \right] + (1 - f\_{\rm{RMS}}) f\_{\rm{crm{m}p}} \tau\_{\rm{f}} \end{cases} \right) \mathbf{f}\_{\rm{por}} \tag{1}$$

Where *α*ice is the proportionality constant due to phase change; *χ* is electronegativity; *T* is temperature; *T*<sup>f</sup> is solidification temperature; *T*ref is reference temperature; *γ* is surface tension; *L* is liquid; V is vapor; *δ*<sup>0</sup> is a molecular distance; *f*RMS is the fraction of ice in contact with the substrate; *κ* is root mean square roughness height; *f*cramp is fraction of mechanical locking; *τ*<sup>f</sup> is Ice shear strength; *f*por is porosity fraction.

Knuth's model [12] is established based on Young's modulus, thermal expansion, and static friction. The model assumes that when the water droplets freeze on the substrate surface, the water droplets expand and freeze in the surface topography, creating a "clamping" mechanism. In order to separate ice from the substrate, the clamping mechanism must be overcome. Assuming there are two methods to separate the ice. The first method assumes that the shear force is perpendicular to the valley on the substrate surface at the microscale. The perpendicular shear force of ice covering the substrate surface is expressed as Eq. (2). The second method assumes that the shear force is parallel to the valley on the substrate surface at the microscale. The parallel shear force of ice covering the substrate surface is expressed as Eq. (3) [12].

$$S\_0 = EA\_0 a \Delta T (\mu\_0 \cos \theta\_0 + \sin \theta\_0) \tag{2}$$

$$S\_0 = 2\mu\_0 E A\_0 a \Delta T \tag{3}$$

Where *S*<sup>0</sup> is the shear force required to shed ice; *E* is Young's modulus of ice; *A*<sup>0</sup> is the Initial area of surface and ice contact; *α* is the thermal coefficient of expansion; *ΔT* is the change in ambient temperature; *μ*<sup>0</sup> is the coefficient of static friction; *θ*<sup>0</sup> is the slope of surface topography, defined as negative with respect to the horizontal plane.

#### *A Brief Review of Blade Surface Icing Adhesive Theories for Wind Turbines DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.113039*

Shen [13] proposed and established an analytical model for expressing the icing adhesion strength based on the mechanical theory, the principles of substrate thermal deformation theory, and the tribology theory. Under a series of assumptions, the relationship between adhesion strength and some parameters, including thermal expansion, bulk modulus, and surface temperature difference of substrates, was established. The model characterizes the surface morphology of the substrate by surface roughness parameters. The adhesion strength of ice covering the surface of substrate material is expressed as Eq. (4) [13].

$$\tau = \frac{\mu K\_i K\_m \Delta T\_2 A (\chi\_i V\_{i1} - \chi\_m V\_{m0})}{S(\cos \theta\_1 - \mu \sin \theta\_1)(K\_i V\_{m2} + K\_m V\_{i2})} \tag{4}$$

Where *μ* is the static friction coefficient between the ice and the peak; *K*<sup>i</sup> is the bulk modulus of ice; *K*<sup>m</sup> is the bulk modulus of the substrate material; Δ*T*<sup>2</sup> is the difference in temperature between the beginning of ice contraction and the full ice contraction; *A* is the contact area between the ice and the peak; *γ*<sup>i</sup> is the volume expansion coefficient of ice; *V*i1 is the volume of ice before contraction when liquid water completely freezes; *γ*<sup>m</sup> is the volume expansion coefficient of substrate material; *V*m0 is the volume of the naked peak before the liquid water contacts the substrate material at the ambient temperature; *S* is the bottom area of a model unit; *θ*<sup>1</sup> is the included angle between the conical busbar and the diameter of the bottom; *V*m2 is the volume of the peak after free contraction at the ambient temperature if there is no squeeze of the ice due to contraction; *V*i2 is the volume of ice after free contraction at the ambient temperature if there is no obstacle of the peak.

Although scholars have carried out a lot of exploration, the calculation results of these models can not well predict the ice adhesion strength. The relationship between the ice adhesion strength, surface topography, and material parameters still needs indepth exploration. Compared to theoretical research, the experimental method is also important for exploring the icing mechanism. Some scholars have researched the relationship between surface roughness and ice adhesion strength in experimental research but have not yet reached a consistent conclusion. In this chapter, according to the existing research results, the relationship between surface roughness and ice adhesion strength can be roughly classified into two categories.

1.There is a correlation between ice adhesion strength and surface roughness. The research of Druez et al. shows a correlation between ice adhesion strength and surface roughness in the range of surface roughness of industries. The ice adhesion strength increases with the increase of surface roughness. When the surface roughness is greater than 20 μm, the adhesion strength tends to extremum [14]. Zhu et al. [15]. found that the adhesion strength increases with surface roughness when surface roughness changes continuously from 3 to 33 μm. The study of Chu and Scavuzzo [16] shows that the ice adhesion strength depends on surface roughness to a great extent. The research of Ding et al. showed that the ice adhesion strength increases with the increase of surface roughness for the hydrophilic surface. In contrast, the changing trend of adhesion strength is the opposite for the hydrophobic surface. There is a significant linear relationship between ice adhesion strength and surface roughness [17]. The research of Guo et al. found that surface roughness greatly affects the ice adhesion strength. Generally speaking, with the increase of surface roughness, the ice adhesion strength of the substrate surface also increases [18].

Zou et al. [19]. found that the ice adhesion strength on the rough surface is much higher than that on the smooth surface.

2.There is no correlation between ice adhesion strength and surface roughness. The study of Sait Alansatan et al. showed that the ice adhesion strength varies with the surface roughness change, but there is no clear trend between them [20].

## **4. Electronic theory**

The electronic theory was mainly proposed by Deryaguin [21]. The electronic theory holds that adhesion is the electrostatic force generated by the electron transfer forming the double-layer charges on the ice-substrate interface. The schematic diagram of the adhesion mechanism of electronic theory is shown in **Figure 4** [9]. This theory is the most controversial of all adhesion theories since it is difficult to prove the existence of double-layer charges without destroying the ice.

In 1997, Ryzhkin and Petrenko [22] first applied the electronic theory to explore the adhesion mechanism between ice and substrates. They proposed and established an electrostatic model based on the existence of the surface states of protonic charge carriers on the surface of ice. The model reveals the relationship between the electrical and adhesive properties of the ice surface, calculating the order of magnitude of adhesive energy at distances greater than one intermolecular distance. The model calculates the order of magnitude of adhesive energy significantly greater than chemical bonding energy and van der Waals forces.

**Figure 4.** *The schematic diagram of the electronic adhesive mechanism [9].*

## **5. Wetting theory**

Wetting theory, also known as adsorption (thermodynamic) theory, is currently a popular adhesion theory. The theory was proposed by Sharpe and Schonhorn in 1963. The wetting theory holds that adhesion is caused by the interaction between the molecules on the interface when the water droplets are in close contact with the

substrate. Therefore, the standard of adhesive performance is essentially the standard of wettability. The contact angle is an important index for evaluating wettability. The schematic diagram of the adhesion of water droplets on the substrate surface is shown in **Figure 5** [9].

As shown in **Figure 5**, when the droplet is on the substrate surface, the droplet adopts a balanced structure that minimizes the system's energy. Young's Equation first described this equilibrium condition, as shown in Eq. (5) [23].

$$
\gamma\_{\rm W,S} + \gamma\_{\rm W} \cos \theta = \gamma\_{\rm S} \tag{5}
$$

Where *γ*<sup>W</sup> is the surface energy of the liquid–vapor interface; *γ*W,S is the surface energy of the solid–liquid interface; *γ*<sup>S</sup> is the surface energy of the solid-vapor interface; *θ* is the contact angle formed by the liquid drop and solid.

As shown in **Figure 5**, if the droplet on the substrate surface (S) is frozen into ice (i), the work required to remove the ice from the substrate surface is called the thermodynamic work of adhesion *W*a. The definition of *W*<sup>a</sup> is shown in Eq. (6) [23].

$$\mathcal{W}\_{\mathfrak{a}} = \chi\_{\mathbb{S}} + \chi\_{\text{ice}} - \chi\_{\mathfrak{i},\mathbb{S}} \tag{6}$$

Where *γ*ice is the surface energy of the ice-vapor interface; *γ*i,S is the surface energy of the solid-ice interface.

According to Eqs. (5) and (6), Wa can be expressed as Eq. (7) [23].

$$\mathcal{W}\_{\mathbf{a}} = \boldsymbol{\chi}\_{\text{ice}} + \boldsymbol{\chi}\_{\text{W}} \cos \theta + \left(\boldsymbol{\chi}\_{\text{W},\text{S}} - \boldsymbol{\chi}\_{\text{i,S}}\right) \tag{7}$$

The surface energy of the solid–liquid interface of water is roughly same as that of ice, so *γ*W, S *≈ γ*i, S [24]. Now assuming that the surface energy of the liquid–vapor interface of ice and water is also approximately the same, *W*<sup>a</sup> can be expressed as Eq. (8) [23].

$$\mathcal{W}\_{\mathfrak{a}} \cong \chi\_{\mathfrak{N}}(\mathfrak{1} + \cos \theta) \tag{8}$$

**Figure 5.** *Schematic diagram of the interaction among solid, liquid, and gas interface [9].*

According to Eq. (4), the thermodynamic work of ice adhesion can be approximately calculated by the surface energy of the solid–liquid interface and the contact angle of water on the substrate surface. The relationship among the thermodynamic work of adhesion, the surface energy of the liquid–vapor interface, and the contact angle is shown in **Figure 6** [23].

In experimental research, scholars have done much research on the relationship between water wettability and ice adhesive properties but have not formed a uniform conclusion. According to the existing research results, this chapter roughly classifies the relationship between water wettability and ice adhesive properties into three categories.


*A Brief Review of Blade Surface Icing Adhesive Theories for Wind Turbines DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.113039*

### **6. Summary**

For the research on the icing mechanism of wind turbines, this chapter briefly summarizes the significant icing theories. The conclusions are as follows:

The icing adhesive theory mainly includes mechanical, electrostatic, and wetting theories. The three theories explain the icing adhesive properties from different viewpoints. However, each theory has its limitations and needs further improvement. Under actual conditions, the icing adhesive properties are also affected by environmental conditions, such as ambient temperature, wind speed, liquid water content, medium volumetric diameter, and liquid water composition, etc. In future research, the influence of environmental factors on adhesive properties should be considered. In addition, research on the icing adhesive theory of wind turbines has not been reported. The research on the icing adhesive theory of wind turbines should be based on the existing theories, introduce relevant theories, and carry out in-depth fusion research. This chapter can provide a reference for studying ice adhesive properties and anti-icing and de-icing technologies of wind turbines.

## **Acknowledgements**

This research was funded by "National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), grant number 51976029".

## **Conflict of interest**

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

## **Appendices and nomenclature**


**87**


*A Brief Review of Blade Surface Icing Adhesive Theories for Wind Turbines DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.113039*

## **Author details**

He Shen1 and Yan Li1,2\*

1 Department of Agricultural Biological Environmental and Energy Engineering, College of Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Ha'erbin, China

2 Heilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Technology and Equipment for the Utilization of Agricultural Renewable Resources in Cold Region, Ha'erbin, China

\*Address all correspondence to: liyanneau@163.com

© 2023 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

## **References**

[1] Gao L, Tao T, Liu Y, et al. A field study of ice accretion and its effects on the power production of utility-scale wind turbines. Renewable Energy. 2021; **167**:917-928. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene. 2020.12.014

[2] Guo W, Shen H, Li Y, et al. Wind tunnel experiments of the rime icing characteristics of a straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbine. Renewable Energy. 2021;**179**:116-132. DOI: 10.1016/ j.renene.2021.07.033

[3] Zeng J, Song B. Research on experiment and numerical simulation of ultrasonic de-icing for wind turbine blades. Renewable Energy. 2017;**113**: 706-712. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene. 2017.06.045

[4] Li Y, Shen H, Guo W. Effect of ultrasonic vibration on the surface adhesive characteristic of iced aluminum alloy plate. Applied Sciences. 2022;**12**: 2357. DOI: 10.3390/app12052357

[5] Wang SL. Numerical simulation and icing wind tunnel test study on icing distribution on blade of horizontal axis wind turbine [thesis]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University; 2017

[6] Li Y, Sun C, Jiang Y, et al. Scaling method of the rotating blade of a wind turbine for a rime ice wind tunnel test. Energies. 2019;**12**:627. DOI: 10.3390/ en12040627

[7] Stokke DD, Wu Q, Han G. Fundamentals of adhesion. In: Stokke DD, Wu Q, Han G, editors. Introduction to Wood and Natural Fiber Composites. 1st ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2013. pp. 129-168. DOI: 10.1002/ 9780470711804.ch5

[8] Kumar RN, Pizzi A. Fundamentals of adhesion. In: Kumar RN, Pizzi A, editors. Adhesives for Wood and Lignocellulosic Substrates. 1st ed. Beverly: Scrivener Publishing LLC; 2019. pp. 31-59. DOI: 10.1002/9781119605584.ch2

[9] Fourche G. An overview of the basic aspects of polymer adhesion Part I: Fundamentals. Polymer Science and Engineering. 1995;**35**:957-966. DOI: 10.1002/pen.760351202

[10] Chaudhury MK, Kim KH. Shearinduced adhesive failure of a rigid slab in contact with a thin confined film. The European Physical Journal E. 2007;**23**: 175-183. DOI: 10.1140/epje/i2007- 10171-x

[11] Fortin G, Perron J. Ice adhesion models to predict shear stress at shedding. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology. 2012;**26**:523-553. DOI: 10.1163/016942411X574835

[12] Knuth TD. Ice Adhesion Strength Modeling Based on Surface Morphology Variations [thesis]. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University; 2015

[13] Shen H. Analytical and experimental researches on the airfoil surface adhesion strength of ice for wind turbine blade [thesis]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University; 2022

[14] Druez J, Phan CL, Laforte JL, et al. The adhesion of glaze and rime on aluminium electrical conductors. Transactions-Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering. 1978;**5**:215-220. DOI: 10.1139/tcsme-1978-0033

[15] Zhu CX, Zhu CL, Zhao WW, et al. Experimental study on the shear adhesion strength between the ice and substrate in icing wind tunnel. Journal of Mechanics. 2017;**34**:209-216. DOI: 10.1017/ jmech.2017.83

*A Brief Review of Blade Surface Icing Adhesive Theories for Wind Turbines DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.113039*

[16] Chu MC, Scavuzzo RJ. Adhesive shear strength of impact ice. AiAA Journal. 1991;**29**:1921-1926. DOI: 10.2514/3.10819

[17] Yunfei D, Shan T, Huijun W. Study on influence of surface microstructure on ice adhesion strength. Surface Technology. 2015;**44**:74-78. DOI: 10.16490/ j.cnki.issn.1001-3660.2015.04.013

[18] Guo Q, Shen XB, Lin GP, et al. Experimental analysis on adhesion force between ice and substrate. Aircraft Design. 2019;**39**:33-37. DOI: 10.19555/j. cnki.1673-4599.2019.04.008

[19] Zou M, Beckford S, Wei R, et al. Effects of surface roughness and energy on ice adhesion strength. Applied Surface Science. 2011;**257**:3786-3792. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.11.149

[20] Alansatan S, Papadakis M. Experimental investigation of ice adhesion. SAE Technical Papers. 1999; **01**(1584):01-12. DOI: 10.4271/1999-01- 1584

[21] Deryaguin BV. Problems of Adhesion. Vestnik Akademie. 1955;**8**:70. DOI: 10.1016/0079-6816(94)90053-1

[22] Ryzhkin IA, Petrenko VF. Physical mechanisms responsible for ice adhesion. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 1997;**101**:6267-6270. DOI: 10.1021/jp9632145

[23] Makkonen L. Ice adhesion-theory, measurements and countermeasures. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology. 2012;**26**:413-445. DOI: 10.1163/016942411X574583

[24] Makkonen L. Surface melting of ice. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 1997;**101**(32):6196-6200. DOI: 10.1021/ jp963248c

[25] Dotan A, Dodiuk H, Laforte C, et al. The relationship between water wetting and ice adhesion. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology. 2009;**23**(15): 1907-1915. DOI: 10.1163/ 016942409x12510925843078

[26] Andersson LO, Golander CG, Persson S. Ice adhesion to rubber substrates. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology. 1994;**8**:117-132. DOI: 10.1163/156856194X00104

[27] Pang H, Zhou S, Gu G, et al. Longterm hydrophobicity and ice adhesion strength of latex paints containing silicone oil microcapsules. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology. 2013; **27**:46-57. DOI: 10.1080/01694243. 2012.701503

[28] Kulinich SA, Farzaneh M. Ice adhesion on super-hydrophobic surfaces. Applied Surface Science. 2009;**255**: 8153-8157. DOI: 10.1016/j. apsusc.2009.05.033

[29] Kulinich SA, Farzaneh M. How wetting hysteresis influences ice adhesion strength on super-hydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir. 2009;**25**:8854-8856. DOI: 10.1021/la901439c

## **Chapter 6**
