**15. Conclusion**

It is interesting to observe how medical and technological sciences have been harmonized with the only purpose of finding solutions to daily problems in the care of patients and in search of improving their health condition.

The results of this systematic review of the literature will serve to have a qualitative and quantitative balance of these medical interventions, allowing to an evaluation of their benefits.

Decisions on the forms of medical intervention should be based on the evaluation of the balance between the benefit and the risks or harm they generate; this evaluation will make it possible to obtain relevant and valid information that will allow the search for different forms of intervention.

The search strategy was based on a relational model and an entity-relationship model, in addition to a model for evaluating the thematic quality of the articles found, which made it possible to establish strategies to minimize biases and avoid making systematic errors when selecting or evaluating the relevant literature.

On this occasion, a systematic review of the literature was carried out, not based on clinical or experimental studies, but focused on reviewing and evaluating health technologies, specifically artificial intelligence and expert systems applied to medicine, medical specialties, and surgical procedures.

The contribution that artificial intelligence is making to medical science, research, and the population's health has been fundamental in the advance of public health interventions and in the approach to diseases. However, it is a cause for concern since technology is advancing faster than the regulatory, ethical, and legal framework; and to what extent these new technologies can benefit or harm humanity.
