[13] Dunna A, Keith KA,

Zuckerman E, et al. Paying attention to the algorithm behind the curtain: Bringing transparency to YouTube's demonetization algorithms. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 2022;**6**:1-31

*Unlocking Monetization Potential in the Age of YouTube Algorithmic Bias: An Analysis… DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.113306*

[14] Rodriguez JA. LGBTQ incorporated: YouTube and the management of diversity. Journal of Homosexuality. 2023;**70**:1807-1828

[15] Southerton C, Marshall D, Aggleton P, et al. Restricted modes: Social media, content classification and LGBTQ sexual citizenship. New Media & Society. 2021;**23**:920-938

[16] Romero-Fresco P. In support of a wide notion of media accessibility: Access to content and access to creation. Journal of Audiovisual Translation. 2018;**1**:187-204

[17] Nunes TWRS. The Internationalization of Film Industries through SVOD Platforms: The Case of Nollywood. [Doctoral dissertation]. Portugal: Universidade Catolica Portugesa; 2020

[18] Mauyakufa TF, Pradhan A. Creating a sustainable Zimbabwean film and television industry. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Bogota, Colombia: IEOM Society International; October 25-26, 2017

[19] Kende M, Quast B. Promoting Content in Africa. Internet Society; 2016. Available from: www.internetsociety. org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/ Promoting20Content20In20Africa.pdf

[20] Kang H, Yin W, Kim J, et al. The competitive advantage of the Indian and Korean film industries: An empirical analysis using natural language processing methods. Applied Sciences. 2022;**12**:4592

[21] Odabasi E. Funds associated with film festivals: Supporting filmmaking in the global south. Loisir et Société/Society and Leisure. 2021;**44**:66-82

[22] Van Hemert T, Ellison E. Punching above our weight: Industry visibility and community engagement in rural and regional film festivals. New Review of Film and Television Studies. 2022;**20**:522-545

[23] Xiang Y. YouTube and the protocological control of platform organisations. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management. 2022;**19**:348-372

[24] Tabares L. Professional amateurs: Asian American content creators in YouTube's digital economy. Journal of Asian American Studies. 2019;**22**:387-417

[25] van Es K. YouTube's operational logic: "The view" as pervasive category. Television & New Media. 2020;**21**:223-239

[26] Akter S, Dwivedi YK, Sajib S, et al. Algorithmic bias in machine learningbased marketing models. Journal of Business Research. 2022;**144**:201-216

[27] Ribeiro MH, Ottoni R, West R, et al. Auditing radicalization pathways on YouTube. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2020. pp. 131-141

[28] Lambrecht A, Sen A, Tucker CE, et al. Algorithmic recommendations and earned media: Investigating product Echo chambers on YouTube. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2021:1-28. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3951425

[29] Fraser T, Crooke AHD, Davidson JW. Music has no borders: An exploratory study of audience engagement with YouTube music broadcasts during COVID-19 lockdown. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020;**12**:1-17. Epub ahead of print. 8 July 2021. DOI: 10.3389/ fpsyg.2021.643893

[30] Pietrobruno S. YouTube flow and the transmission of heritage: The interplay of users, content, and algorithms. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 2018;**24**:523-537

[31] Alkhatib A, Bernstein M. Street-level algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2019. pp. 1-13

[32] Hokka J. PewDiePie, racism and Youtube's neoliberalist interpretation of freedom of speech. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 2021;**27**:142-160

[33] Kellett Z. Anime and Affect: Professional Fandom and the YouTube Platform in the Age of Monetization. Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers, the State Newark, New Jersey: University of New Jersey, Graduate School-Newark; 2021

[34] Hosseinmardi H, Ghasemian A, Clauset A, et al. Examining the consumption of radical content on YouTube. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences;**118**. Epub ahead of print. 10 August 2021. pp. 1-8. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2101967118

[35] Ma C. What is the "lite" in "alt-lite?" the discourse of white vulnerability and dominance among YouTube's reactionaries. Social Media + Society. 2021;**7**:205630512110363

[36] Munger K, Phillips J. Right-wing YouTube: A supply and demand perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 2022;**27**:186-219

[37] Matamoros-Fernández A, Gray JE, Bartolo L, et al. What's "up next"? Investigating algorithmic recommendations on YouTube across issues and over time. Media and Communication. 2021;**9**:234-249

[38] Berman R, Katona Z. Curation algorithms and filter bubbles in social networks. Marketing Science. 2020;**39**:296-316

[39] Li Y, Xie Y. Is a picture worth a thousand words? An empirical study of image content and social media engagement. Journal of Marketing Research. 2020;**57**:1-19

[40] Feeney MK, Porumbescu G. The limits of social media for public administration research and practice. Public Administration Review. 2021;**81**:787-792

[41] Celi LA, Cellini J, Charpignon M-L, et al. Sources of bias in artificial intelligence that perpetuate healthcare disparities—A global review. PLOS Digital Health. 2022;**1**:e0000022

[42] Boratto L, Fenu G, Marras M. The Effect of Algorithmic Bias on Recommender Systems for Massive Open Online Courses. Vol. 11437. 2019. pp. 457-472

[43] Tackett S, Slinn K, Marshall T, et al. Medical education videos for the world. Academic Medicine. 2018;**93**:1150-1156

[44] Caplan R, Gillespie T. Tiered governance and demonetization: The shifting terms of labor and compensation in the platform economy. Social Media + Society. 2020;**6**:205630512093663

[45] Graham C, Young F, Marjan A. The generation Z audience for in-app advertising. Journal of Indian Business Research. 2021;**13**:343-360

[46] Munaro AC, Barcelos R, Francisco Maffezzolli EC, et al. To engage or not engage? The features of video content

*Unlocking Monetization Potential in the Age of YouTube Algorithmic Bias: An Analysis… DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.113306*

on YouTube affecting digital consumer engagement. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 2021;**20**:1336-1352

[47] Han Y, Lappas T, Sabnis G. The importance of interactions between content characteristics and creator characteristics for studying Virality in social media. Information Systems Research. 2020;**31**:576-588

[48] Clarke RI, Schoonmaker S. Metadata for diversity. Journal of Documentation. 2019;**76**:173-196

[49] Birhane A. Algorithmic injustice: A relational ethics approach. Patterns. 2021;**2**:100205

[50] Lepri B, Oliver N, Letouzé E, et al. Fair, transparent, and accountable algorithmic decision-making processes. Philosophy and Technology. 2018;**31**:611-627

[51] Stoddart MCJ. Ideology, hegemony, discourse: A critical review of theories of knowledge and power. Thought & Research. 2007;**28**:191-225

[52] Kellner D. Network Television and American Society: Introduction to a Critical Theory of Television. Vol. 10. Source: Theory and Society; 1981. pp. 31-62

[53] Herbert D, Lotz AD, Marshall L. Approaching media industries comparatively: A case study of streaming. International Journal of Cultural Studies. 2019;**22**:349-366

[54] Newsinger J, Eikhof DR. Explicit and implicit diversity policy in the UK film and television industries. Journal of British Cinema and Television. 2020;**17**:47-69

[55] Flisfeder M. Political theory and film: From Adorno to Žižek. Contemporary Political Theory. 2019;**18**:255-258

[56] Wight K. Dominant discourses in Canadian film school program websites. Media Education Research Journal. 2022;**11**:1-8. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7459950

[57] Tomaselli KG. Africa, film theory and globalization: Reflections on the first ten years of the journal of African cinemas. Journal of African Cinemas. 2021;**13**:3-28

[58] Ordiz I. Serrano CA, Gothic Imagination in Latin American Fiction and Film. Brumal Revista de Investigación Sobre Lo Fantástico. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press; 2019. ISBN: 9780826360441. 2020;**8**:261. DOI: 10.5565/rev/brumal.701

[59] Noheden K. Against all aristocracies: Surrealism, anarchism, and film. Modmod (Baltim Md). 2020;**27**:567-582

[60] Ceuterick M. Introduction: Gender, space, and affects in film. In: Affirmative Aesthetics and Wilful Women. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. pp. 1-35

[61] Waldman D. Critical theory and film: Adorno and 'the culture industry'. Revisited. Source: New German Critique. 1977;**12**:39-60

[62] Ørmen J, Gregersen A. Towards the engagement economy: Interconnected processes of commodification on YouTube. Media, Culture and Society. 2023;**45**:225-245

[63] Ribes X. Is the YouTube animation algorithm-friendly? How YouTube's algorithm influences the evolution of animation production on the Internet. Animation. 2020;**15**:229-245
