**Author details**

Wen Wen1 \* and Jill Castek<sup>2</sup>

1 State University of New York at Oneonta, Oneonta, NY, USA

2 University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA

\*Address all correspondence to: wen.wen@oneonta.edu

© 2023 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

*An Examination of Peer-to-Peer Scaffolding as Metacognitive Support for Learning DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.113921*

## **References**

[1] Hsieh YC. A case study of the dynamics of scaffolding among ESL learners and online resources in collaborative learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 2017;**30**(1-2):115-132

[2] Scardamalia M, Bereiter C. Knowledge building and knowledge creation: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In: Sawyer RK, editor. The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2014. pp. 397-417

[3] Choi I, Land SM, Turgeon AJ. Scaffolding peer-questioning strategies to facilitate metacognition during online small group discussion. Instructional Science. 2005;**33**:483-511

[4] Forman EA, Cazden CB. Exploring Vygotskian perspectives in education: The cognitive value of peer interaction. In: Wertsch JV, editor. Culture, Communication, and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1985. pp. 323-347

[5] Webb NM, Palincsar AS. Group processes in the classroom. In: Berliner DC, Cafree RC, editors. Handbook of Educational Psychology. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan; 1996. pp. 841, 841-873, 873

[6] Jacobs G, Castek J. Collaborative digital problem solving: Power, relationships, and participation. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy. 2022;**65**(5):377-387

[7] Leu DJ, Kinzer C, Coiro J, Castek J, Henry LA. New literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment.

In: Alvermann D, Unrau NJ, Sailors M, Ruddell RB, editors. Theoretical Models and Processes of Literacy. 7th ed. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2018. pp. 319-346

[8] Vygotsky LS. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1978

[9] Wood D, Bruner JS, Ross G. The role of tutoring in problem solving. Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines. 1976;**17**(2):89-100. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

[10] Bruner J. Play, thought, and language. Peabody Journal of Education. 1983;**60**(3):60-69

[11] King A, Staffieri A, Adelgais A. Mutual peer tutoring: Effects of structuring tutorial interaction to scaffold peer learning. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1998;**90**(1):134- 152. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.134

[12] Cross DR, Paris SG. Developmental and instructional analyses of children's metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1988;**80**(2):131-142

[13] Flavell JH. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist. 1979;**34**(10):906-911

[14] Kuhn D, Dean D. A bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice. Theory into Practice. 2004;**43**(4):268-273

[15] Schraw G, Crippen KJ, Hartley K. Promoting self-regulation in science

education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education. 2006;**36**:111-139

[16] Whitebread D, Coltman P, Pasternak DP, Sangster C, Grau V, Bingham S, et al. The development of two observational tools for assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children. Metacognition and Learning. 2009;**4**(1):63-85

[17] Lai ER. Metacognition: A literature review. Always Learning: Pearson Research Report. 2011;**24**:1-40

[18] Biasutti M, Frate S. Group metacognition in online collaborative learning: Validity and reliability of the group metacognition scale (GMS). Educational Technology Research and Development. 2018;**66**(6):1321-1338. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-018-9583-0

[19] de Oliveira LC. A language-based approach to content instruction (LACI) for English language learners: Examples from two elementary teachers. International Multilingual Research Journal. 2016;**10**(3):217-231

[20] Fennema-Bloom JR. Codescaffolding: A pedagogic codeswitching technique for bilingual content instruction. Journal of Education. 2010;**190**(3):27-35. DOI: 10.1177/002205741019000304

[21] Cazden CB. Peekaboo as an instructional strategy: Discourse development at home and at school. In: Papers and Reports on Child Language Development. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Department of Linguistics; 1979. p. 17

[22] Castek J. How do 4th and 5th grade Students Acquire the New Literacies

of online Reading Comprehension? Exploring the Contexts that Facilitate Learning. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Storrs: University of Connecticut; 2008

[23] Palincsar AS. The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction. Educational Psychologist. 1986;**21**:73-98

[24] Coiro J, Sekeres DC, Castek J, Guzniczak L. Comparing third, fourth, and fifth graders' collaborative interactions while engaged in online inquiry. Journal of Education. 2014;**194**(2):1-15

[25] Coiro J, Sparks J, Kiili C, Castek J, Lee C, Holland B. Students engaging in multiple-source inquiry tasks: Capturing dimensions of collaborative online inquiry and social deliberation. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice. 2019;**68**(1):271-292

[26] Sekeres DC, Castek J. Collaborative online inquiry: Exploring students' skills in locating, reading, and communicating information. Journal of Interactive Online Learning. 2016;**14**(2):58-79

[27] Sekeres DC, Coiro J, Castek J, Guzniczak L. Wondering + inquiry = learning: Designing collaborative online inquiries for elementary students. Phi Delta Kappan. 2014;**96**(3):44-48

[28] Coiro J, Castek J, Guzniczak L. Uncovering online reading comprehension processes: Two adolescents reading independently and collaboratively on the internet. In: Dunston P, Gambrell L, Headley K, Fullerton S, Stecker P, Gillis V, Bates C, editors. 60th Annual Yearbook of the Literacy Research Association. Oak Creek, WI: LRA; 2011. pp. 354-369

[29] Castek J, Coiro J, Guzniczak L, Bradshaw C. Examining peer

*An Examination of Peer-to-Peer Scaffolding as Metacognitive Support for Learning DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.113921*

collaboration in online inquiry. The Educational Forum. 2012;**76**(4):479-496. DOI: 10.1080/00131725.2012.707756

[30] Mercer N. The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk amongst Teachers and Learners. Philadelphia PA: Multilingual Matters Ltd; 1995

[31] Wen W. Exploring Teaching and Learning in Undergraduate Online Digital Literacies Course: Instructor's Scaffolding, Students' Performance and Perspectives. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Tucson: University of Arizona; 2023

[32] Hung BP, Nguyen LT. Scaffolding language learning in the online classroom. In: Sharma R, Sharma D, editors. New Trends and Applications in Internet of things (IoT) and Big Data Analytics. Cham: Springer; 2022. pp. 109-122

[33] Lavrakas PJ. Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2008. DOI: 10.4135/9781412963947

[34] Oguilve V, Wen W, Castek J, Sanderson C, Pineda Z. Participatory learning: Educators designing media to expand global perspectives. In: Bastiaens T, editor. Proceedings of EdMedia + Innovate Learning; June 2022. New York City, NY, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE); 2022. pp. 1016-1025

[35] Flick O. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. 4th ed. London: Sage Publications; 2009

[36] Hao J, Liu L, von Davier A, Kyllonen P, Kitchen C. Collaborative problem solving skills versus collaboration outcomes: Findings from statistical analysis and data mining. In: Proceedings of the 9th International

Conference on Educational Data Mining. Raleigh, NC: EDM; Jun 2016. pp. 382-387

[37] Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc; 1994

[38] Saldaña J. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication Inc; 2015

[39] Lew S, Yang A H, Harklau L. Qualitative methodology. In Phakiti A, De Costa P, Plonsky L, Starfield S. editors. The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Linguistics Research Methodology. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2018. p. 79-101

[40] Stone CA. The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 1998;**31**:344-364

[41] Stone CA. Should we salvage the scaffolding metaphor? Journal of Learning Disabilities. 1998;**31**:409-413

[42] Stone CA. What is missing in the metaphor of scaffolding? In: Forman EA, Minick NM, Stone CA, editors. Contexts for Learning: Sociocultural Dynamics in children's Development. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993. pp. 169-183
