**Author details**

Ali Hamad Albalhareth Department of Special Education, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia

\*Address all correspondence to: ahsbalhareth@nu.edu.sa; albalhareth.1@osu.edu

© 2023 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

*Metacognitive Strategies with Deaf and Hard of Hearing (DHH) Individuals and Ways to Assess… DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.113379*

### **References**

[1] Israel SE. Using Metacognitive Assessments to Create Individualized Reading Instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association; 2007

[2] Pressley M, Afflerbach P. Verbal Protocols of Reading: The Nature of Constructively Responsive Reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1995

[3] Schmitt MC. Measuring students' awareness and control of strategic processes. In: Israel SE, Bauserman KL, Kinnucan-Welsch K, Block CC, editors. Metacognition in Literacy Learning: Theory, Assessment, Instruction, and Professional Development. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2005. pp. 123-142

[4] Albalhareth A, Paul PV, Alasmari A. Teachers' perceptions of metacognitive strategies and assessments used with d/deaf and hard of hearing students. Human Research in Rehabilitation. 2022;**12**(1):5-21

[5] Albalhareth A, Alasmari A. Metacognitive strategies implemented with d/Dhh students in upper elementary schools in Saudi Arabia. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2023;**47**:101222

[6] Flavel JH. Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In: Resnick LB, editor. The Nature of Intelligence. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1976. pp. 231-235

[7] Flavel JH, Friedrichs AG, Hoyt JD. Developmental changes in memorization processes. Cognitive Psychology. 1970;**1**(4):324-340

[8] Flavel JH, Wellman HM. Metamemory. In: Kail R, Hagen J, editors. Perspectives on the Development of

Memory and Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1977

[9] Flavel JH. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive- developmental inquiry. American Psychologist. 1979;**34**(10):906-911

[10] Fleming SM, Lau HC. How to measure metacognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2014;**8**:443

[11] Myers M, Paris SG. Children's metacognitive knowledge about reading. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1978;**70**(5):680-690

[12] Pearson PD, Cervetti GN. The roots of reading comprehension instruction. In: Israel SE, editor. Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2017. pp. 12-56

[13] Wellman HM. Knowledge of the interaction of memory variables: A developmental study of metamemory. Developmental Psychology. 1978;**14**(1):24

[14] Baker L, Carter Beall L. Metacognitive processes and reading comprehension. In: Israel SE, Duffy GG, editors. Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension. New York: Routledge; 2009. pp. 373-388

[15] Hacker DJ, Dunloskey J, Graesser AC, editors. Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1998

[16] Israel SE, Block CC, Kinnucan-Welsch K, Bauserman K. Metacognition in Literacy Learning: Theory, Assessment, Instruction, and

Professional Development. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 2005

[17] Siegler RS. The other Alfred Binet. Developmental Psychology. 1992;**28**:179-190

[18] McAnally PL, Rose S, Quigle SP. Reading Practices with Deaf Learners. USA: Pro-Ed; 2007

[19] Rousseau DM. Schema, promise and mutuality: The building blocks of the psychological contract. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2001;**74**(4):511-541

[20] Piaget J. The Language and Thought of the Child (M. Gabain, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1926

[21] Morrison C, Marschark M, Sarchet T, Convertino CM, Borgna G, Dirmyer R. Deaf students' metacognitive awareness during language comprehension. European Journal of Special Needs Education. 2013;**28**(1):78-90

[22] Alasmari A, Albalhareth A. Specific challenges in the development of English literacy for deaf and hard-of-hearing students. International Journal of Literacies. 2022;**29**(2):13-26

[23] Vygotsky LS. Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1978

[24] Schirmer BR. Using verbal protocols to identify the reading strategies of students who are deaf. Journal of Deaf Studies & Deaf Education. 2003;**8**(2):157-170

[25] Strong M, Prinz P. Is American sign language skill related to English literacy. Language Acquisition by Eye. 2000;**2000**:131-141

[26] Schirmer BR, Bailey J, Lockman AS. What verbal protocols reveal about the reading strategies of deaf students: A replication study. American Annals of the Deaf. 2004;**149**(1):5-16

[27] Baker L, Brown A. Metacognitive skills and reading. In: Pearson PD, Barr R, Kamil ML, Mosenthal P, editors. Handbook of Reading Research. New York: Longman; 1984. pp. 353-394

[28] Meichenbaum D. Teaching thinking: A cognitive-behavioral perspective. In: Thinking and Learning Skills. Routledge; 2013. pp. 407-426

[29] McCormick CB. Metacognition and learning. In: Reynolds WM, Miller GE, editors. Handbook of Psychology: Educational Psychology. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2003. pp. 79-102

[30] Paris SG, Lipson MY, Wixson K. Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 1983;**8**(3):293-316

[31] Block CC. What are metacognitive assessments? In: Israel SE, Block CC, Bauserman KL, Kinnucan-Welsch K, editors. Metacognition in Literacy Learning: Theory, Assessment, Instruction, and Professional Development. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 2005. pp. 83-100

[32] Pressley M, Harris KR. Cognitive strategies instruction: From basic research to classroom instruction. In: Alexander PA, Winne PH, editors. Handbook of Educational Psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2006. pp. 265-286

[33] National Reading Panel. Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching Children to Read – An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific

*Metacognitive Strategies with Deaf and Hard of Hearing (DHH) Individuals and Ways to Assess… DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.113379*

Research Literature on Reading and its Implications for Reading Instruction. National Institute for Literacy at EDPubs. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; 2000

[34] LaSasso C, Davey B. The relationship between lexical knowledge and reading comprehension for prelingually, profoundly hearing-impaired students. Volta Review. 1987;**89**(4):211-220

[35] Van Kraayenoord CE. The role of metacognition in reading comprehension. Focal Points of the Research and Development of Pedagogically-psychological Perspectives. 2010;**2010**:277-302

[36] Mahdavi JN, Tensfeldt L. Untangling reading comprehension strategy instruction: Assisting struggling readers in the primary grades. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth. 2013;**57**(2):77-92

[37] Utley CA, Mortweet Van Scoyoc S, Greenwood CR. Peer-mediated instruction and interventions. Focus on Exceptional Children. 1997;**29**(5):1-24

[38] Alzahrani T, Leko M. The effects of peer tutoring on the reading comprehension performance of secondary students with disabilities: A systematic review. Reading & Writing Quarterly. 2017;**34**(1):1-17

[39] Fuchs D, Fuchs LS. Peer-assisted learning strategies: Promoting word recognition, fluency, and reading comprehension in young children. The Journal of Special Education. 2005;**39**(1):34-44

[40] Fuchs D, Fuchs LS. Increasing strategic reading comprehension with peer-assisted learning activities. In: McNamara DS, editor. Reading

Comprehension Strategies: Theories, Interventions, and Technologies. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007. pp. 175-197

[41] Maheady L, Mallette B, Harper GF. Four classwide peer tutoring models: Similarities, differences, and implications for research and practice. Reading & Writing Quarterly. 2006;**22**(1):65-89

[42] Palincsar A, Brown AL. Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction. 1984;**1**(2):117-175

[43] Mastropieri MA, Scruggs TE, Graetz JE. Reading comprehension instruction for secondary students: Challenges for struggling students and teachers. Learning Disability Quarterly. 2003;**26**(2):103-116

[44] Greenwood CR, Delquadri JC, Hall RV. Longitudinal effects of classwide peer tutoring. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1989;**81**(3):371-383

[45] Greenwood CR. Longitudinal analysis of time, engagement, and achievement in at-risk versus nonrisk students. Exceptional Children. 1991;**57**(6):521-532

[46] Snow CE, Burns MS, Griffin P, editors. Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1998

[47] Silvestri JA, Wang Y. A grounded theory of effective reading by profoundly deaf adults. American Annals of the Deaf. 2018;**162**(5):419-444

[48] Harris TL, Hodges RE. The Literacy Dictionary: The Vocabulary of Reading and Writing. Newark, DE: International Reading Association; 1995

[49] Paris SG, Flukes J. Assessing children's metacognition about strategic reading. In: Israel SE, Block CC, Bauserman KL, Kinnucan-Welsh K, editors. Metacognition Literacy Learning: Theory, Assessment, Instruction, and Professional Development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2005. pp. 121-139

[50] Zimmerman BJ. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist. 1990;**25**(1):3-17

[51] Block CC, Israel SE. The ABCs of performing highly effective think-alouds. The Reading Teacher. 2004;**58**(2):154-167

[52] Carroll JB. Defining language comprehension: Some speculation. In: Carroll JB, Freedle RO, editors. Language Comprehension and the Acquisition of Knowledge. Washington DC: V.H. Winston and Sons; 1972

[53] Strassman BK. Deaf adolescents' metacognitive knowledge about schoolrelated reading. American Annals of the Deaf. 1992;**137**(4):326-330

[54] Banner A, Wang Y. An analysis of the reading strategies used by adult and student deaf readers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 2011;**16**(1):2-23

[55] Ericsson KA, Simon H. Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1984

[56] Ericsson KA, Simon H. Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1993

[57] Krahmer E, Ummelen N. Thinking about thinking aloud: A comparison of two verbal protocols for usability testing. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. 2004;**47**(2):105-117

[58] Krockow EM, Colman AM, Pulford BD. Exploring cooperation and competition in the centipede game through verbal protocol analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology. 2016;**46**(6):746-761

[59] Perfetti CA, Lesco R. Sentences, individual differences, and multiple texts: Three issues in text comprehension. Discourse Processes. 1979;**23**(3):337-355

[60] Stanovich KE. The Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences for individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly. 1986;**21**(4):360-407

[61] Tergeson JK, Wagner J. What it means to learn to read. Child Development. 1987;**56**(5):1134-1144

[62] Oakhill J, Yuill N. Higher order factors in comprehension disability: Processes and remediation. In: Cornoldi L, Oakhill J, editors. Models of Effective Educational Assessment. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 1999. pp. 111-135

[63] LaSasso C. The effect of WH question format versus incomplete statement format on deaf students' demonstration of comprehension of textexplicit information. American Annals of the Deaf. Washington, D.C: Gallaudet University Press; 1979;**124**(7):833-837
