Soil-Structure Interaction: Understanding and Mitigating Challenges

*Ali Akbar Firoozi and Ali Asghar Firoozi*

## **Abstract**

This chapter provides a comprehensive analysis of Soil-Structure Interaction (SSI), a key component in solving complex engineering challenges amidst rapid urbanization and changing environmental conditions. It elucidates the theoretical principles and practical implications of SSI, emphasizing its role in creating sustainable and resilient engineering solutions. The chapter explores the soil's response to different load scenarios, highlighting the impact on structural reliability and integrity. The narrative includes real-world case studies demonstrating the practical application of SSI principles, advocating their integration into contemporary construction methodologies for improved structural safety. It also outlines innovative strategies to tackle SSI-related challenges, such as employing advanced materials and computational models. Finally, the focus is placed on sustainability and resilience-driven solutions designed to withstand the tests of time and climate change. Serving as a valuable guide for various stakeholders in the field, this chapter underscores the significance of SSI in the development of environmentally conscious and structurally robust constructions.

**Keywords:** soil-structure interaction, theoretical mechanics, structural stability, mitigation strategies, sustainable practices, construction resilience, geotechnical engineering, impact of climate change

## **1. Introduction**

Soil-structure interaction (SSI) is a crucial concept in geotechnical and earthquake engineering that contemplates the interplay between structures and the ground they rest on. This interaction significantly influences the behavior of structures during events like earthquakes. Broadly, SSI encompasses three primary components:


(deep, shallow, pile, etc.) and its properties significantly impact the interaction between the structure and the soil.

iii. *Soil:* This refers to the ground on which the structure stands. Properties like soil type (clay, sand, rock, etc.), stiffness, density, and stratification greatly influence its interaction with the structure. Soil can amplify or attenuate seismic waves, altering how an earthquake impacts a structure.

When an earthquake occurs, the ground's motion transfers to the structure through the foundation. Structure responds according to its dynamic characteristics and the nature of the ground movement. Subsequently, structure's motion affects the ground motion, giving rise to a complex interplay known as soil-structure interaction. SSI holds significant implications for the safety, efficacy, and sustainability of structures. It encapsulates the mutual influence between a structure and the soil supporting it [1–3]. Understanding SSI is essential for designing structures resilient to various load types, from static to dynamic loads induced by earthquakes. Technological advances and computational models have equipped engineers with tools to better understand and analyze SSI. However, due to the inherent variability and heterogeneity of soil, the range of structure types, and the diversity of loading conditions, SSI remains a challenging topic. The changing climate and escalating environmental concerns add further complexity to SSI and foundation engineering [4–6].

**Table 1** offers brief explanations of key terminologies associated with SSI, a critical aspect of this study. **Figure 1** visualizes the SSI concept, illustrating the interaction between structures and soils. This chapter delves into the challenges and complexities of SSI, providing an overview of theoretical aspects, discussing advanced computational models and their applications, and exploring sustainable practices in foundation engineering. Its objective is to contribute to the ongoing dialog in the field, inspire future research, and guide the engineering community through the complexities of SSI.

## **2. Theoretical aspects of soil-structure interaction**

The theoretical aspects of SSI cover a wide range of topics due to the complex interplay between structural and geotechnical engineering principles. Here are some key theoretical aspects:


#### **Table 1.**

*Key terminologies associated with soil-structure interaction.*

*Soil-Structure Interaction: Understanding and Mitigating Challenges DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.112422*

**Figure 1.** *(a) Soil-structure system; and (b) soil-structure discrete model [12].*


The theoretical understanding of SSI is intricate, involving sophisticated numerical modeling techniques and advanced concepts of soil and structural dynamics. Various mathematical models, ranging from simplified linear models to detailed nonlinear

ones, are utilized to represent the soil, the structure, and their interaction. These models are typically solved using computational methods like finite element analysis. Several mathematical models are employed to represent SSI, one of which is captured by Eq. (1), illustrating the dynamic equilibrium of a soil-structure system. This equation typically includes the mass, damping, and stiffness matrices of both the structure and soil, in addition to the loading terms. In a simplified matrix form, it can be expressed as:

$$[\mathbf{M}]\mathbf{a} + [\mathbf{C}]\mathbf{v} + [\mathbf{K}]\mathbf{d} = \mathbf{F} \tag{1}$$

where:

[M]: is the mass matrix, a: is the acceleration vector, [C]: is the damping matrix, v: is the velocity vector, [K]: is the stiffness matrix, d: is the displacement vector, F: is the force vector.

This equation is typically solved using various numerical methods, such as the Finite Element Method (FEM) or the Finite Difference Method (FDM), to analyze the soil-structure system. The theoretical aspects of SSI encompass a wide array of principles and concepts, developed over many years of research and practical applications. These provide a fundamental understanding of how structures and soil interact and offer guidance for designing and constructing safe and effective structures. SSI theory usually includes the evaluation of stress distribution in soil, the estimation of soil deformation and settlement, and the assessment of soil's dynamic response under varying load conditions. It considers the three-dimensional nature of structures and soil and considers the influence of the soil's nonlinear, anisotropic, and inelastic properties on the behavior of structures [3, 13, 14].

Key considerations in SSI include the type and depth of the foundation, soil stratification and properties, and the type and intensity of loads. For instance, shallow foundations, typically used for light structures, rely on the concept of bearing capacity to ensure structural safety. Conversely, deep foundations like piles and drilled shafts are used for heavier structures or when the top layers of soil are weak. These foundations derive their strength from both side friction and end bearing. Their design and analysis involve understanding the pile-soil interaction under different loading conditions [2, 4, 15]. In the following sections, we will delve deeper into these theoretical aspects, discuss advanced computational models used for SSI analysis, and explore practical considerations and recent research findings in the field. Numerous techniques have been developed for modeling SSI, each with its unique advantages and applications. These methods are summarized in **Table 2**.

### **3. Soil-structure interaction in seismic design**

Soil-structure interaction (SSI) plays a pivotal role in seismic design. During an earthquake, the energy transmitted through the ground interacts with structures, impacting their response. Comprehending and incorporating SSI can notably enhance the accuracy of seismic design and aid in averting structural failures during earthquakes. The performance of structures during seismic events is paramount in civil


#### **Table 2.**

*Different SSI Modeling techniques and their applications.*

engineering. Often, a building's response to such events is dictated not only by the structure itself but by the interaction between the structure and the ground on which it's built - this is known as SSI. SSI can alter the characteristics of the ground motion experienced by a structure during an earthquake, as well as the forces and deformations the structure undergoes [3]. Some essential points about the role of SSI in seismic design include:


For these reasons, SSI is a crucial consideration in the seismic design of structures. However, SSI analysis can be complex, necessitating sophisticated numerical methods and a comprehensive understanding of soil and structural dynamics. Therefore, in practice, SSI is often considered in the design of critical or large structures, like nuclear power plants or major bridges, where the effects of SSI can be significant. For smaller or less critical structures, the effects of SSI are often approximated or neglected, depending on the specifics of the situation.

### **3.1 Introduction to seismic design**

Seismic design refers to the practice of devising structures to ensure their sufficient resistance to seismic activity. The primary objective is safeguarding human life. Traditionally, seismic design principles have been grounded in the concept of strength. This design approach sought to guarantee that the structure could withstand forces induced by ground shaking without collapsing. However, this approach has gradually evolved to accommodate other factors such as structural performance, economic considerations, and the necessity for structures to maintain functionality postearthquake.

In the process of seismic design, a structure's likely behavior during an earthquake is modeled and analyzed to ascertain its capacity to resist anticipated forces and movements. This process frequently entails considering the soil's behavior under seismic loading conditions and the interaction between the structure and the ground during such events [3, 19]. In this context, SSI assumes a pivotal role. It's the mutual influence that a structure and the supporting soil have on each other during seismic activity. This interaction can significantly impact the structure's response to an earthquake, affecting its safety and performance. Therefore, considering SSI in seismic design is crucial for enhancing the robustness and resilience of the structure against earthquake-induced forces.

#### **3.2 Importance of soil-structure interaction in seismic design**

Incorporating soil-structure interaction (SSI) into a seismic design is essential for several reasons [3, 14, 20]:


*Soil-Structure Interaction: Understanding and Mitigating Challenges DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.112422*


**Table 3.**

*Comparison of the effects of neglecting SSI in design vs. considering it.*

between the structure and the ground can induce additional forces in the structure, which need to be considered in the design. Furthermore, ground deformation due to seismic activity can also lead to extra structural deformation.

A comparison of the effects of neglecting SSI in design versus considering it is presented in **Table 3**. This comparison highlights the significance of including SSI in seismic design and the potential risks associated with its omission.

#### **3.3 Challenges in incorporating SSI in seismic design**

Incorporating soil-structure interaction (SSI) into a seismic design can be challenging due to its inherent complexity and the resources required for proper analysis. Here are some of the primary challenges [3, 20]:


detailed instructions on how to model and analyze SSI for specific situations. This lack of comprehensive, easy-to-use guidelines can make it difficult for practitioners to incorporate SSI into their designs. Hence, there's a need for more explicit guidelines and standards to aid in the practical application of SSI principles in seismic design.

#### **3.4 Current approaches to address SSI in seismic design**

Despite these challenges, there are ongoing efforts to address SSI in seismic design. One prevalent approach is conducting a site-specific ground motion analysis. This process involves modeling the local soil conditions and simulating the ground motion at the site, owing to a range of potential earthquakes. The analysis results are then utilized to derive the seismic input for the structural design. Another strategy is to carry out a dynamic soil-structure interaction analysis. This approach requires modeling both the structure and the soil and simulating their interaction under seismic loading. This process enables the calculation of additional forces and deformations in the structure due to SSI, which can be incorporated into the design. Several methodologies are also under development to simplify the modeling and analysis of SSI. For instance, substructure methods allow for independent analysis of the structure and the soil, thereby reducing computational costs. In addition, surrogate modeling techniques are being developed to approximate the complex behavior of SSI, thereby rendering its analysis more manageable [3, 14].

**Table 4** presents an overview of some of the current strategies to address Soil-Structure Interaction (SSI) in seismic design. It is crucial to note that each of these strategies has its own advantages and limitations. The choice of method will depend on the specifics of the structure and site, the structure's significance, and the resources available for the analysis. In practice, more than one method might be employed. For instance, a simplified method might be used for preliminary design, while a more detailed method could be used for the final design. Moreover, these methods are continuously being developed and improved as our understanding of SSI and computational capabilities grow.

#### **3.5 Future directions in SSI for seismic design**

While significant progress has been made in addressing SSI in seismic design, there remains a substantial amount of work yet to be accomplished. Future research should focus on enhancing the precision and efficiency of SSI modeling and analysis and developing comprehensive, practical guidelines for its inclusion in seismic design. Additionally, there is a growing need for more in-depth research into the effects of SSI on non-structural elements of buildings, such as partitions, ceilings, and mechanical and electrical systems. These elements can be significantly impacted by SSI, and their failure could pose a risk to human safety and disrupt the building's functionality. Lastly, it's essential to better incorporate SSI considerations into the broader framework of performance-based seismic design. This approach involves designing structures to meet specific performance objectives, such as life safety, building functionality, and economic loss, under various levels of seismic hazards. The inclusion of SSI in this framework can lead to more realistic and effective seismic designs.


*Soil-Structure Interaction: Understanding and Mitigating Challenges DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.112422*

#### **Table 4.**

*Overview of current approaches for addressing soil-structure interaction (SSI) in seismic design.*

## **4. Evaluating soil-structure interaction**

Having established a fundamental understanding and appreciation of SSI, the subsequent phase concentrates on evaluation methods. The evaluation of SSI incorporates both experimental and computational approaches. These techniques assist in gaining insights into the intricate behavior of the soil and the structure during seismic events, laying the foundation for the design and assessment of structures subjected to such events [22]. Furthermore, evaluating SSI involves discerning how a structure interacts with the soil on which it stands, particularly during occurrences such as earthquakes. This evaluation is critical for seismic design as it can substantially influence a structure's behavior and stability during seismic events. The key steps involved in evaluating SSI are as follows:

• *Soil and site characterization*: The initial step in evaluating SSI is understanding the soil and site characteristics. This involves geotechnical investigations to

determine the soil type, layering, and properties like stiffness, density, and damping. For seismic design, additional details such as the soil's shear wave velocity may be required.


By meticulously evaluating SSI, engineers can design structures that are more resilient to seismic events, leading to safer and more sustainable built environments.

## **4.1 Experimental approaches**

Experimental approaches to SSI evaluation largely include laboratory testing and field testing. Laboratory testing involves small-scale models of soil and structures which are subjected to simulated seismic loading conditions. This method provides invaluable information on the behavior of the soil, its structure, and its interaction under controlled conditions. On the other hand, field testing involves full-scale structures and actual soil conditions. Techniques such as seismic shaking table tests and vibration tests are commonly employed. While field testing provides more realistic data, it's important to note that the complexity and costs associated with these tests can be substantial [23, 24]. The choice of experimental approach hinges on factors such as the specifics of the structure and site, the research question or design issue under consideration, and the resources available for testing. In practice, both experimental and analytical methods are often utilized in tandem for a comprehensive evaluation of SSI (**Table 5**).


*Soil-Structure Interaction: Understanding and Mitigating Challenges DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.112422*

#### **Table 5.**

*Experimental approaches for evaluating soil-structure interaction: Overview, advantages, and limitations.*

## **4.2 Computational approaches**

Computational approaches to SSI evaluation involve utilizing numerical methods to simulate the soil and the structure's behavior, as well as their interaction under seismic loading. The Finite Element Method (FEM) and the Finite Difference Method (FDM) are widely employed due to their versatility in modeling intricate geometries and materials. However, these methods can be computationally demanding, particularly for large-scale or complex problems. As a result, simplified methods such as the substructure method and the equivalent linearization method are often employed for practical design applications. These methods can approximate the behavior of SSI with an acceptable degree of accuracy, while significantly reducing computational costs [22, 25]. The choice of computational approach is dependent on the specifics of the problem, which includes the nature of the soil and the structure, the type of loading, and the level of detail required in the analysis (**Table 6**).


**Table 6.**

*Computational approaches for evaluating soil-structure interaction: Overview, advantages, and limitations.*

#### **4.3 Challenges in evaluating SSI**

Despite the availability of these approaches, the evaluation of SSI is laden with difficulties. The complexity of SSI, stemming from the interaction between the nonlinear, hysteretic behavior of the soil, and the dynamic behavior of the structure, makes it a daunting task to model and analyze accurately. Furthermore, uncertainties in soil properties and seismic ground motion can significantly influence the results of SSI evaluation. Consequently, there is a pressing need for methods that can adequately accommodate these uncertainties [26]. However, the evaluation of SSI is a complex endeavor encompassing various challenges, including but not limited to:

1.*Modeling complexity*: SSI involves the interaction between diverse types of materials such as concrete, steel, and various types of soil, which may exhibit non-linear, rate-dependent, and path-dependent behavior. Accurately modeling these materials and their interactions can be quite challenging.


These challenges imply that the evaluation of SSI often necessitates a blend of sophisticated computational modeling, careful interpretation of field and laboratory test data, and sound engineering judgment. Despite these hurdles, the importance of SSI in many engineering problems underscores its significance as a vital area of study and research.

#### **4.4 Recent advances in SSI evaluation**

Recent advancements in computational technology and methods have opened new avenues for the evaluation of SSI. High-performance computing has paved the way for more intricate and realistic simulations of SSI. Concurrently, progress in numerical methods, such as the development of non-linear soil models and stochastic analysis methods, have heightened the accuracy and dependability of SSI evaluation. Additionally, innovative experimental techniques like micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) sensors and digital image correlation (DIC) have refined the precision and expanded the reach of SSI measurements, thereby augmenting the data available for validating computational models [26]. While these advancements offer promising avenues, they simultaneously underscore the importance of sustained research and development to further refine the state-of-the-art in SSI evaluation.

## **5. Mitigating challenges in soil-structure interaction**

Understanding and evaluating SSI is more than just an academic endeavor; its fundamental aim is to inform the design and construction of structures capable of efficiently withstanding seismic events. Consequently, mitigating the challenges associated with SSI carries paramount significance. These mitigation strategies can encompass everything from sophisticated modeling techniques to innovative construction methodologies.

#### **5.1 Refined modeling techniques**

Indeed, accurately encapsulating the intricate behavior of SSI poses significant challenges. Therefore, there is an ongoing effort to refine existing models and to devise new ones. Recent advancements in numerical modeling techniques, such as nonlinear dynamic analyses, probabilistic methods, and hybrid simulations, have shown considerable promise in delivering more accurate predictions of SSI. For example, hybrid simulation techniques—where a portion of the system is modeled numerically and the rest experimentally—have emerged as a popular method to analyze complex SSI problems. This approach strikes a balance between the realism offered by experimental tests and the adaptability inherent in numerical simulations [27, 28].

#### **5.2 Innovative construction methods**

Apart from advancements in modeling techniques, innovative construction methods and technologies have also been developed to mitigate the effects of SSI. Techniques such as ground improvement, isolation systems, and energy dissipation devices are now commonly used to enhance the performance of structures subjected to seismic loading. Ground improvement techniques aim to enhance the properties of the soil, reducing its potential to amplify seismic motions. These methods include compaction, grouting, and soil stabilization, among others. Conversely, isolation systems and energy dissipation devices are installed within the structure to minimize the forces transmitted from the ground to the structure during an earthquake. Examples of these systems include base isolation mechanisms and dampers [29, 30].

#### **5.3 Design codes and guidelines**

Efforts to mitigate the challenges of SSI are also reflected in various design codes and guidelines. These resources provide practitioners with practical methods and criteria for incorporating SSI considerations into the design and assessment of structures. However, these codes and guidelines are based on a simplified understanding of SSI and may not fully account for its complexity. Therefore, ongoing research and development are essential to enhance these standards and ensure they reflect the most recent understanding and advancements in the field of SSI [26]. **Table 7** provides an outline of some common design codes and guidelines that address soil-structure interaction.

#### **5.4 Soil improvement and reinforcement techniques**

Soil improvement and reinforcement techniques play a pivotal role in managing the risks associated with SSI. These techniques aim to enhance the soil's inherent


## *Soil-Structure Interaction: Understanding and Mitigating Challenges DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.112422*

#### **Table 7.**

*Key design codes and guidelines addressing soil-structure interaction (SSI).*

properties, thereby making it more resistant to deformation and failure under various loads, including those induced by seismic activities [31, 32]. Some commonly used techniques include:


These soil improvement and reinforcement techniques can significantly reduce the effects of SSI by bolstering the soil's seismic resistance. However, the choice of the appropriate technique depends on several factors, including the type of soil, the load to be supported, and the specific requirements of the project.

## **5.5 Advanced foundation design**

The design of a foundation plays a crucial role in mitigating the effects of SSI. Advanced foundation design approaches such as pile foundations, mat foundations, and raft foundations are frequently employed. These types of foundations distribute loads over a larger area, thereby reducing the stresses transmitted to the soil and minimizing the potential for excessive deformation and failure (Das 2016). A summary of these foundation types is as follows:


soil. Mat foundations are beneficial when dealing with weak soils, as they evenly distribute the load across a larger surface area, thus reducing the potential for excessive deformation and failure.

iii. *Raft foundations*: A raft foundation is a thick concrete slab reinforced with steel that covers the entire contact area of the structure, much like a thick floor. Sometimes the area covered by the raft may be greater than the contact area, depending on the soil's bearing capacity underneath. The reinforcing bars usually run perpendicular to each other in both the top and bottom layers of steel reinforcement.

These advanced foundation designs, when appropriately used, can offer a more effective and resilient response to the challenges posed by SSI. The choice among these foundation types of hinges on various factors, including the nature of the load, the type of structure, the properties of the soil, and the presence of any potential seismic activity.

### **5.6 Earthquake resistant design**

Earthquake-resistant design principles aim to ensure that structures can withstand the forces generated by earthquakes without sustaining significant damage. This involves designing the structure to have enough strength, stiffness, and ductility to resist seismic forces. The key principle of earthquake-resistant design is to ensure that the structure can deform in a controlled manner under seismic loading, thereby preventing catastrophic failure. Furthermore, seismic base isolation and energy dissipation techniques are widely used in earthquake-prone areas to decrease the forces transmitted from the ground to the structure. These techniques aid in mitigating the impacts of SSI in the following ways:


By isolating the structure from the ground motion or dissipating the seismic waves' energy, these techniques help to reduce the impact of SSI. However, it is important to note that these techniques should be applied in conjunction with other design practices to effectively mitigate the potential impacts of earthquakes [29, 33].

#### **5.7 Soil-structure interaction: mitigation and management**

Managing the effects of SSI necessitates the implementation of a comprehensive strategy that considers all the aforementioned factors. This strategy may include

thorough site investigation, sophisticated geotechnical analysis, appropriate structural design, and the employment of advanced technologies for soil improvement and reinforcement. The role of numerical modeling is also vital in managing SSI. Advanced numerical models that can simulate the behavior of both soil and structure under different loading conditions can provide valuable insights into the potential impacts of SSI. These insights can guide the design and construction process, helping engineers to mitigate the effects of SSI [34]. In conclusion, while the challenges posed by SSI are considerable, they can be effectively managed through a combination of advanced engineering techniques and innovative design practices. Continuous research and development in this area will enable engineers to further their understanding of SSI and develop more effective solutions to mitigate its effects. The field of SSI is a vital area of study that holds significant potential for improving the resilience and safety of structures, especially in regions prone to seismic activity.

### **6. Case studies**

In this section, we present a series of case studies that underscore the challenges posed by SSI in real-world projects, as well as the approaches used to tackle them. These case studies provide concrete examples of the principles and techniques previously discussed. An array of case studies has been conducted to understand the implications of SSI in real-world circumstances. The primary findings from these case studies are consolidated and presented in **Table 8**.

### **6.1 Case study 1: sustainable practices in soil-structure interaction**

In the recent years, the push towards sustainable construction practices has extended into the realm of geotechnical engineering, encompassing soil-structure interaction (SSI) too. This has resulted in the creation and application of eco-friendly materials and groundbreaking techniques that not only secure structural safety and longevity, but also minimize the environmental impact of construction activities. A notable illustration of such sustainable practices is the utilization of recycled materials in geotechnical applications. The use of recycled construction and demolition waste (CDW) as backfill, or reinforcement materials can considerably diminish the demand for traditional, non-renewable geotechnical materials like sand or gravel. In addition,


#### **Table 8.**

*Major case studies involving SSI and key findings.*

studies have shown that the mechanical properties of properly processed CDW can rival, or even exceed, those of traditional geotechnical materials [38, 39].

#### **6.2 Case study 2: computational models in soil-structure interaction**

The realm of soil-structure interaction has been revolutionized by advancements in computational power and technology, ushering in more sophisticated and accurate computational models to forecast the behavior of soils and structures under varying conditions. These models facilitate the comprehension of complex SSI phenomena and offer a quantitative foundation for designing and assessing geotechnical engineering solutions. Finite element methods (FEM) and boundary element methods (BEM) are frequently employed for analyzing SSI problems. These numerical methods allow engineers to replicate the intricate behavior of soils and structures within a computer environment, yielding insights into their interaction under diverse load conditions. Other novel computational models, such as the distinct element method (DEM), are also gaining popularity due to their ability to simulate the granular nature of the soil more accurately. These advancements in computational modeling are crucial in designing safer, more efficient structures while minimizing the costs and uncertainties associated with traditional, empirical design approaches [25, 40].

#### **6.3 Case study 3: a highway embankment**

The third case study pertains to the construction of a highway embankment over soft, compressible soil as part of an expansive highway improvement project. Given the potential for considerable settlement and instability under the embankment's weight, this posed significant challenges. The project team utilized an innovative approach, which incorporated a blend of ground improvement techniques to augment the soil's properties. The team employed preloading to hasten the consolidation of the soft soil and used geosynthetics to reinforce the soil and enhance its shear strength [41, 42].

The project also gained from a comprehensive geotechnical investigation, which allowed the team to fine-tune the design of the ground improvement works and ensure their effectiveness. Numerical modeling aided in understanding the soil's behavior under the embankment load. Throughout the project, the team vigilantly monitored the settlement and stability of the embankment. This proactive approach enabled the identification of potential issues early on and the implementation of necessary corrective measures [31, 43, 44]. The project reached a successful completion, exhibiting the embankment's performance under traffic loads. This case study emphasizes the importance of understanding and managing SSI during the design and construction of transportation infrastructure.

## **7. Future directions and concluding remarks**

Understanding the intricacies of soil-structure interaction (SSI) is integral to the design and construction of secure and reliable civil engineering structures. As showcased in the case studies in this chapter, SSI management requires a multidisciplinary approach. This involves marrying geotechnical investigations, advanced numerical modeling, inventive foundation solutions, and continuous performance monitoring. Looking into the future, the challenges associated with SSI will undoubtedly continue to develop. Climate change, urbanization, and technological advancements are just some of the factors that will drive these changes. Engineers will need to stay abreast of these developments and adjust their practices accordingly [31].

There is a vast potential for leveraging advanced technologies to improve our comprehension and management of SSI. These technologies include sensors for real-time monitoring of soil and structural behavior, advanced geotechnical investigation techniques, and the application of artificial intelligence and machine learning to optimize foundation design and performance prediction. Sustainability is another key trend in geotechnical engineering. It will be incumbent on engineers to consider the environmental and social impacts of their projects and seek ways to minimize these through sustainable design and construction practices. In conclusion, the study and management of SSI represent a dynamic and challenging field in civil engineering. However, by embracing the complexities of SSI, engineers can devise innovative and sustainable solutions that are able to respond to the demands of our rapidly evolving world [6, 45].

Green technologies and practices are gaining traction in the construction industry, and it is expected that this trend will foster the adoption of eco-friendly foundation solutions. For example, the use of recycled materials and geosynthetics can enhance soil properties and decrease the demand for concrete and steel, materials associated with high embodied energy. The incorporation of Building Information Modeling (BIM) and 3D printing in construction could also transform the way we design and build foundations. These technologies allow for increased precision and efficiency in the design process and could potentially facilitate the construction of more complex and optimized foundation systems [46].

Furthermore, ongoing research and development are necessary in the domain of numerical modeling of SSI. Although current models have significantly advanced our understanding of SSI, they still have limitations in accurately representing complex soil behaviors and interactions under varying loading and environmental conditions. Ultimately, deepening our understanding of SSI and continuously improving the techniques and technologies for managing it are crucial to surmounting the geotechnical challenges of future infrastructure projects. Through continued research and the exchange of knowledge and best practices, we can anticipate a future where the complexities of SSI are embraced and effectively managed, resulting in safer and more sustainable built environments [31, 41, 45, 47].

### **8. Case studies: challenges and sustainable practices**

Case studies offer an essential look into the practicalities of managing soilstructure interaction (SSI). In this section, we will delve into a series of case studies. Each one will spotlight a distinctive challenge related to SSI, alongside the sustainable practices that were effectively implemented to surmount these obstacles.

#### **8.1 Case study 1: managing differential settlement in skyscraper construction**

Building skyscrapers introduces numerous challenges for foundation engineering, including managing differential settlements. This was a significant issue confronted during the construction of the Burj Khalifa in Dubai, the tallest building globally at its completion. Towering at an awe-inspiring height of 828 meters, the Burj Khalifa's enormous scale necessitated a solid foundation design. The building's foundation system employed a piled raft, a decision based on comprehensive geotechnical

### *Soil-Structure Interaction: Understanding and Mitigating Challenges DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.112422*

investigations that included both in-situ and laboratory tests. The soil-structure interaction was complex due to the varying soil conditions, comprising layers of sand and weathered rock. To address this complexity, advanced numerical models were deployed to simulate the SSI and predict the settlement behavior of the super-tall structure accurately [48]. These models considered various factors, such as Dubai's calcareous soil's non-linear behavior and the immense vertical loads resulting from the building's weight. The successful completion of the Burj Khalifa represented a significant achievement in foundation engineering, demonstrating modern engineering's capacity to manage complex soil-structure interactions.

## **8.2 Case study 2: overcoming liquefaction risk in seismically active regions**

Soil liquefaction poses serious threats to structures in seismically active regions. This was clearly evident during the 2011 Christchurch earthquake in New Zealand, which led to substantial structural damage due to soil liquefaction. In the aftermath of this catastrophe, comprehensive research was undertaken to improve our understanding and mitigation of the effects of soil liquefaction. This effort involved meticulous investigations into the SSI during and after the seismic event. The ground improvement techniques employed, such as stone columns and deep soil mixing, demonstrated success in reducing the risk of liquefaction and restoring the strength and stiffness of the liquefied soil. Consequently, these techniques have been recommended for deployment in similar seismic scenarios in the future [49]. This case study exemplifies how a combination of geotechnical engineering practices, underpinned by a thorough understanding of soil-structure interaction, can protect structures and, most importantly, save lives in regions prone to seismic activity.

### **8.3 Case study 3: implementing green foundations in urban construction**

Soil liquefaction poses serious threats to structures in seismically active regions. This was clearly evident during the 2011 Christchurch earthquake in New Zealand, which led to substantial structural damage due to soil liquefaction. In the aftermath of this catastrophe, comprehensive research was undertaken to improve our understanding and mitigation of the effects of soil liquefaction. This effort involved meticulous investigations into the SSI during and after the seismic event. The ground improvement techniques employed, such as stone columns and deep soil mixing, demonstrated success in reducing the risk of liquefaction and restoring the strength and stiffness of the liquefied soil. Consequently, these techniques have been recommended for deployment in similar seismic scenarios in the future [49]. This case study exemplifies how a combination of geotechnical engineering practices, underpinned by a thorough understanding of soil-structure interaction, can protect structures and, most importantly, save lives in regions prone to seismic activity.

#### **8.4 Case study 4: dealing with expansive soils**

Dealing with expansive soils, which experience considerable volume changes due to variations in moisture content, is a frequent challenge in geotechnical engineering. These soils can inflict significant damage on foundations and structures. A case in point was encountered during the construction of a residential development in Dallas, Texas, where expansive clay soil presented substantial risks. The strategy for mitigation involved designing a stiffened slab foundation system capable of tolerating the

volumetric changes of the underlying expansive soil. Furthermore, site-specific moisture conditioning of the soil was undertaken to curtail future volume changes. During the design and execution stages of the foundation system, careful considerations of SSI were paramount. The successful completion of this project underscored the importance of understanding and accommodating SSI when contending with expansive soils [50].

#### **8.5 Case study 5: bridge foundations in flood-prone areas**

Constructing bridges in flood-prone areas demands special attention due to the potential impact of scour on the stability of foundations. The challenges related to soilstructure interaction (SSI) were starkly exhibited during the design of the foundation for a bridge across the River Elbe in Germany. To ensure stability against lateral loads due to potential scour effects, the bridge's foundation was designed using largediameter bored piles. The design process necessitated complex numerical modeling to understand SSI under the combined influence of vehicular loads, river flow, and potential scour. The successful completion of this project highlighted the pivotal role of SSI in the design and construction of bridge foundations in demanding environments [51]. These case studies underscore that understanding SSI is crucial in managing diverse challenges in foundation engineering, which can differ significantly based on the specific attributes of the site and the structure.

### **9. Sustainable practices in foundation engineering**

In response to growing environmental concerns and the urgent call for sustainable development, the sphere of foundation engineering has begun to embrace a multitude of green practices. This section offers an overview of such sustainable practices within foundation engineering and explores their potential to alleviate diverse challenges associated with soil-structure interaction (SSI).

#### **9.1 Use of recycled and natural materials**

The use of recycled materials and natural fibers in foundation construction presents an effective approach to decreasing environmental impact. These materials, being widely available and cost-effective, lessen our dependence on non-renewable resources. For example, recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) have been successfully utilized as substitutes for natural aggregates in constructing various types of foundations. Additionally, natural fibers, such as coir, jute, and bamboo, have shown promising results in enhancing soil stability, which in turn improves the performance of foundations constructed on these stabilized soils [52, 53].

#### **9.2 Energy-efficient foundation systems**

Energy piles, an innovative concept that merges the structural role of foundation piles with the role of heat exchangers for ground-source heat pumps, exemplify sustainable and energy-efficient foundation systems. By incorporating both the functions of heat exchange and load bearing, energy piles offer a sustainable solution for space heating and cooling, while concurrently ensuring the structural safety of buildings [54].

## **9.3 Low-impact construction techniques**

Low-impact construction methods, like the use of helical piles and micro piles, can significantly minimize environmental disruption during foundation construction. These methods require fewer materials and cause minimal soil disturbance, making them a more sustainable choice for foundation construction, especially in environmentally sensitive areas [55].

## **9.4 Biotechnical solutions**

Biotechnical solutions, another aspect of sustainable foundation engineering, focus on harnessing natural processes for soil stabilization and enhancement. The most recognized biotechnical solution is bio-cementation, a process that employs microorganisms to instigate calcite precipitation within soil, thereby bolstering its strength and reducing permeability [56]. This approach shows promise not only from a sustainability standpoint but also for its potential to augment the performance of soilstructure systems.

## **9.5 Reuse of excavated soil**

Another sustainable practice in foundation engineering is the repurposing of excavated soil. Instead of treating this soil as waste, it can be processed and reused in construction projects. A range of soil improvement techniques, such as soil mixing and stabilization with cementitious materials, can enhance the properties of the excavated soil and make it suitable for reuse [57]. In conclusion, sustainable practices in foundation engineering have immense potential for addressing various challenges related to soil-structure interaction. As advancements in this field continue to unfold, the integration of sustainable principles into foundation engineering is expected to become increasingly prevalent in the future.

## **10. Future research directions and conclusion**

As we progress in our endeavor for sustainable solutions within the field of soilstructure interaction, numerous promising avenues for future research emerge. These are fueled by the escalating need for sustainable urban development and the mounting challenges induced by climate change and resource scarcity.


The implementation of sustainable practices in soil-structure interaction is an imperative step towards a more resilient and sustainable urban future. As our understanding and technologies advance, we are likely to witness an even greater emphasis on sustainability in the field of foundation engineering.

### **10.1 Advanced geotechnical investigation techniques**

The need for advanced geotechnical investigation techniques to comprehend the phenomena of soil-structure interaction more effectively is paramount. These include the employment of non-destructive testing methods, such as geophysical methods—seismic refraction and electrical resistivity, for instance—that can provide comprehensive data on subsurface conditions without disturbing the soil [58]. Furthermore, remote sensing technologies, which utilize satellite or airborne data to assess and monitor the properties of the soil and the site, offer significant potential for broad, highresolution site characterization. These sophisticated techniques facilitate a more holistic understanding of the soil's properties and behavior, thus enabling more accurate prediction and management of soil-structure interactions.

#### **10.2 Development of innovative materials**

Continued research into the development of innovative materials for soil improvement and foundation construction is a crucial aspect of future exploration. This includes harnessing the potential of recycled and waste materials to reduce environmental impact and reliance on virgin resources. Bio-inspired materials, inspired by nature and its mechanisms, also present a rich source of potential solutions. Simultaneously, the advancement and optimization of geosynthetics—synthetic products used to stabilize terrain—represent another promising area of research. These materials not only offer opportunities for enhanced performance but also contribute to the sustainability of construction practices [59].

#### **10.3 Machine learning and AI in foundation engineering**

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in foundation engineering heralds a promising future research direction. These advanced digital tools can aid in the accurate prediction of soil behavior, the optimization of foundation design, and ongoing performance monitoring of established structures [60]. In conclusion, the realm of soil-structure interaction is in a state of constant evolution, stimulated by the mounting demand for sustainable solutions and

continuous technological advancements. By acknowledging and engaging with the intricate phenomena of soil-structure interaction, while incessantly pursuing innovative and sustainable methodologies, we can tackle diverse challenges in foundation engineering. In doing so, we contribute substantially to the sustainable growth and resilience of our built environment.

#### **10.4 Coupled numerical modeling**

The intricate nature of soil-structure interaction necessitates the utilization of progressively sophisticated numerical modeling techniques. Looking ahead, we can anticipate further advancements in synergistic modeling approaches that account for the multiphysical and multi-phase behaviors of soils under diverse loading conditions [61].

#### **10.5 Climate change and soil-structure interaction**

The impacts of climate change, including sea-level rise and an increased incidence of extreme weather events, pose substantial challenges for soil-structure interaction. Future research endeavors will necessitate a concentrated effort to comprehend these effects and formulate resilient and adaptive foundation systems to mitigate potential harm [62].

### **10.6 Education and training in foundation engineering**

Finally, the role of education and training in foundation engineering cannot be overstated. Future research should explore the development of innovative educational strategies, incorporating digital technologies into the process of teaching and learning foundation engineering principles [63, 64]. By adopting these research directions, we can aspire to enrich our understanding of soil-structure interaction phenomena, creating more efficient and sustainable solutions in foundation engineering. However, it's imperative to remember that these technological and scientific advancements should always be matched with a deep respect for nature and a firm commitment to social justice and equality.

## **11. Conclusion**

Soil-Structure Interaction (SSI) continually presents substantial challenges to geotechnical engineers and scientists. As explored in this chapter, the nature of the issue is multifaceted, requiring interdisciplinary approaches and a profound understanding of the underlying soil mechanics and structural behavior. SSI extends beyond the application of intricate numerical models; it necessitates an in-depth comprehension of the fundamentals of geotechnical and structural engineering. Recent strides in computational methods, geotechnical investigation techniques, and an improved understanding of soil behavior under various loading conditions have greatly amplified our ability to analyze and design structures considering SSI effects. However, challenges persist, particularly in the realms of complex soil behavior, climate change effects, and sustainable practices in foundation engineering.

In an epoch of climate change and escalating infrastructure demands, it's essential to reconsider traditional methods and embrace innovative and sustainable solutions. Future research should concentrate on a more comprehensive understanding of SSI, incorporating considerations for environmental and social

impacts. While new technological advancements offer considerable potential, their application should coincide with a profound understanding of their limitations and a dedication to ethical and sustainable practices. As we continue to erect and develop infrastructure globally, the understanding and application of soil-structure interaction will become progressively critical. By accepting the challenges and opportunities presented by this complex field, engineers can aid in sculpting a more sustainable and resilient future. Despite substantial progress in understanding and addressing the challenges associated with soil-structure interaction, there exist numerous opportunities for future research:


By focusing on these research directions, we can further our understanding of soilstructure interaction and contribute to the development of safer, more resilient, and sustainable built environments.

## **12. Closing remarks**

This chapter has delved into an in-depth examination of the complexities and challenges inherent in soil-structure interaction (SSI), a fundamental facet of

#### *Soil-Structure Interaction: Understanding and Mitigating Challenges DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.112422*

geotechnical engineering. From deciphering basic principles and terminologies to dissecting advanced computational models and sustainable practices, this chapter endeavored to offer a thorough overview of the subject matter. The understanding and practical application of SSI are paramount to the safe and efficient design and construction of structures. As we persist in developing and building our infrastructure, the significance of considering SSI cannot be stressed enough. Neglecting the interactions between soil and structure can result in structural failures, over-design, or even under-design. Hence, it's vital to incorporate the effects of SSI into the design and analysis process. However, analyzing SSI is no simple task given the inherent complexities involved. A multitude of factors, including the type of soil, the properties of the structure, the nature of loads, and the environmental conditions, all play significant roles in determining the SSI. Thus, it's imperative for engineers and researchers to possess a comprehensive understanding of these factors and their impacts on SSI.

In an era characterized by climate change and mounting environmental concerns, sustainable practices in foundation engineering have become increasingly crucial. This chapter showcased several strategies and solutions that can be employed to make foundation engineering more sustainable. These encompass the use of recycled or locally sourced materials, the adoption of low-carbon practices, and the incorporation of resilience into design and construction. As we progress, it is expected that our understanding of SSI will continue to evolve in line with technological advancements, computational models, and sustainable practices. With further research and a steadfast commitment to sustainable and ethical practices, we can anticipate substantial progress in the field of foundation engineering.

## **Acknowledgements**

We wish to extend our heartfelt gratitude to all the researchers, scientists, and engineers whose relentless dedication and diligence have driven progress in the field of soil-structure interaction (SSI). Their curiosity and unwavering commitment have cleared the path towards a more profound understanding of the intricacies of SSI, the creation of more sustainable practices in foundation engineering, and the design and construction of safer, more efficient structures. We are particularly grateful to the authors of all the studies, papers, and articles referenced in this chapter. Their invaluable contributions formed the fundamental basis for this comprehensive exploration of SSI. Lastly, we want to express our appreciation to our peers and colleagues for their valuable feedback and guidance throughout the writing process of this chapter. Their insights and recommendations significantly augmented the quality and breadth of our work.

## **Author details**

Ali Akbar Firoozi\* and Ali Asghar Firoozi Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana

\*Address all correspondence to: a.firoozi@gmail.com

© 2023 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

*Soil-Structure Interaction: Understanding and Mitigating Challenges DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.112422*

## **References**

[1] Das BM, Sivakugan N. Principles of Foundation Engineering. 9th ed. Stamford, CT USA: Cengage Learning; 2018. ISBN-13: 978-1337705028

[2] Rad MM, Ibrahim SK. Optimal plastic analysis and design of pile foundations under reliable conditions. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering. 2021;**65** (3):761-767. DOI: 10.3311/PPci.17402

[3] Sitharam TG, Kolathayar S, Ravi S, Matsagar V. Theory and Practice in Earthquake Engineering and Technology. Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering (SPRTRCIENG); 2022. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-2324-1

[4] Große C. A review of the foundations of systems, infrastructure and governance. Safety Science. 2023;**160**:106060. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106060

[5] Sun J, Zhu W, Mu B, Zhong J, Lin N, Chen S, et al. Efficient extraction of biodiesel feedstock and dehydration of kitchen waste: A method based on codissolution of liquefied dimethyl ether and water. Waste Management. 2022; **147**:22-29. DOI: 10.1016/j. wasman.2022.04.044

[6] Wang F, Wang Q, Adams CA, Sun Y, Zhang S. Effects of microplastics on soil properties: Current knowledge and future perspectives. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2022;**424**:127531. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127531

[7] Salgado R, Kumar S, Basu D, Alvarez GME, Gavin K, Ahmad SF. General Report—Session 1: Analysis, Design, Testing and Performance of Foundations. 2008. Available from: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icchge/ 6icchge/session00c/1?utm\_source= scholarsmine.mst.edu%2Ficchge% 2F6icchge%2Fsession00c%2F1&utm\_

medium=PDF&utm\_campaign= PDFCoverPages

[8] Kramer SL. Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Pearson Education India; 1996

[9] Wong HL. Dynamic soil-structure interaction. 1975. Available from: https:// resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechEERL:1975. EERL-75-01

[10] Stewart JP, Fenves GL, Seed RB. Seismic soil-structure interaction in buildings. I: Analytical methods. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering. 1999;**125**(1):26-37. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:1 (26)

[11] Gazetas G. Analysis of machine foundation vibrations: state of the art. International Journal of soil dynamics and earthquake engineering. 1983;**2**(1):2-42. DOI: 10.1016/0261-7277(83)90025-6

[12] Vaseghiamiri S, Mahsuli M, Ghannad MA, Zareian F. Probabilistic approach to account for soil-structure interaction in seismic design of building structures. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2020; **146**(9):04020184. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE) ST.1943-541X.0002741

[13] Falcone R, Lima C, Martinelli E. Soft computing techniques in structural and earthquake engineering: A literature review. Engineering Structures. 2020; **207**:110269. DOI: 10.1016/j. engstruct.2020.110269

[14] Younesian D, Hosseinkhani A, Askari H, Esmailzadeh E. Elastic and viscoelastic foundations: A review on linear and nonlinear vibration modeling and applications. Nonlinear Dynamics. 2019;**97**(1):853-895. DOI: 10.1007/ s11071-019-04977-9

[15] Briaud JL. Geotechnical engineering: unsaturated and saturated soils. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2013

[16] Zienkiewicz OC, Emson C, Bettess P. A novel boundary infinite element. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 1983;**19**(3):393- 404. DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620190307

[17] Beer J, van Geel B. Holocene climate change and the evidence for solar and other forcings. Natural Climate Variability and Global Warming: A Holocene Perspective. 2008;**138-162**. DOI: 10.1002/9781444300932

[18] Kausel E. Early history of soil– structure interaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2010;**30**(9): 822-832. DOI: 10.1016/j. soildyn.2009.11.001

[19] Bolisetti C, Whittaker AS. Numerical investigations of structure-soil-structure interaction in buildings. Engineering Structures. 2020;**215**:110709. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110709

[20] Shamsi M, Shabani MJ, Vakili AH. Three-dimensional seismic nonlinear analysis of topography–structure–soil– structure interaction for buildings near slopes. International Journal of Geomechanics. 2022;**22**(3):04021295. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943- 5622.0002301

[21] Mylonakis G, Gazetas G. Seismic soil-structure interaction: beneficial or detrimental? Journal of earthquake engineering. 2000;**4**(3):277-301. DOI: 10.1080/13632460009350372

[22] Shiravand MR, Parvanehro P. Spatial variation of seismic ground motion effects on nonlinear responses of cable stayed bridges considering different soil types. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake

Engineering. 2019;**119**:104-117. DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.01.002

[23] Firoozi AA, Naji M, Firoozi AA. Effects of soil–structure interaction on performance of bridges during earthquakes. Case Study: Integral Abutment Bridge in Pennsylvania, USA. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering. 2023;**2023**:1-19. DOI: 10.1007/s40996-023-01122-w

[24] Jong SC, Ong DEL, Oh E. State-ofthe-art review of geotechnical-driven artificial intelligence techniques in underground soil-structure interaction. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2021;**113**:103946. DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2021.103946

[25] Reddy JN. Introduction to the Finite Element Method. 4th ed. Chicago, IL, USA: McGraw-Hill Education; 2019. ISBN-13: 978-1259861901

[26] Colaço A, Barbosa D, Costa PA. Hybrid soil-structure interaction approach for the assessment of vibrations in buildings due to railway traffic. Transportation Geotechnics. 2022;**32**:100691. DOI: 10.1016/j. trgeo.2021.100691

[27] Hashash YM, Park D. Non-linear one-dimensional seismic ground motion propagation in the Mississippi embayment. Engineering Geology. 2001; **62**(1–3):185-206. DOI: 10.1016/S0013- 7952(01)00061-8

[28] Oliveto ND. Geometrically nonlinear analysis of friction pendulum systems under tri-directional excitation. Engineering Structures. 2022;**269**: 114770. DOI: 10.1016/j. engstruct.2022.114770

[29] Çerçevik AE, Avşar Ö, Hasançebi O. Optimum design of seismic isolation

*Soil-Structure Interaction: Understanding and Mitigating Challenges DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.112422*

systems using metaheuristic search methods. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2020;**131**:106012. DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.106012

[30] Loveridge F, McCartney JS, Narsilio GA, Sanchez M. Energy geostructures: A review of analysis approaches, in situ testing and model scale experiments. Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment. 2020;**22**:100173. DOI: 10.1016/j.gete.2019.100173

[31] Das BM. Principles of Geotechnical Engineering. 10th ed. Stamford, CT, USA: Cengage Learning; 2021. ISBN-13: 978-0357420485

[32] Ge B, Ruan H, Shu S, Zhang F, Gao Y. Effects of seismic amplification on the stability design of geosyntheticreinforced soil walls. Geotextiles and Geomembranes. 2022;**50**(5):881-895. DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.05.003

[33] Freddi F, Galasso C, Cremen G, Dallsta A, Di Sarno L, Giaralis A, et al. Innovations in earthquake risk reduction for resilience: Recent advances and challenges. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2021;**60**: 102267. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr. 2021.102267

[34] Sani AK, Singh RM, Amis T, Cavarretta I. A review on the performance of geothermal energy pile foundation, its design process and applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2019;**106**:54-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.008

[35] Chen Y, Guéguen P, Chen KH, Lin CJ, Ku CS, Huang WG, et al. Dynamic characteristics of TAIPEI 101 skyscraper from rotational and translation seismometers. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 2023; **113**(2):690-709. DOI: 10.1785/ 0120220147

[36] Malhotra S. Seismic Soil-Pile Interaction: Physical Processes and Analytical Models. In: 5th International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. Missouri University of Science and Technology; 2010. p. 47. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icrageesd/ 05icrageesd/session05/47

[37] Coleman JL, Bolisetti C, Whittaker AS. Time-domain soil-structure interaction analysis of nuclear facilities. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 2016; **298**:264-270. DOI: 10.1016/j. nucengdes.2015.08.015

[38] Ahn S, Park G, Yoon H, Han JH, Jung J. Evaluation of soil–structure interaction in structure models via shaking table test. Sustainability. 2021;**13** (9):4995. DOI: 10.3390/su13094995

[39] Badr M, Lotfy A. Sustainable Tunneling and Underground Use. Cham: Springer Nature; 2019. DOI: 10.1007/ 978-3-030-01884-9

[40] Ayala F, Sáez E, Magna-Verdugo C. Computational modelling of dynamic soil-structure interaction in shear wall buildings with basements in medium stiffness sandy soils using a subdomain spectral element approach calibrated by micro-vibrations. Engineering Structures. 2022;**252**:113668. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113668

[41] Ghosh B, Fatahi B, Khabbaz H, Nguyen HH, Kelly R. Field study and numerical modelling for a road embankment built on soft soil improved with concrete injected columns and geosynthetics reinforced platform. Geotextiles and Geomembranes. 2021;**49** (3):804-824. DOI: 10.1016/j. geotexmem.2020.12.010

[42] Ullah A, Kassim A, Ahmed S, Ullah R, Junaid M, Zia MD. Experimental

analysis of embankment on soft soil improved with bottom ash columns. Transportation Geotechnics. 2022;**37**: 100881. DOI: 10.1016/j. trgeo.2022.100881

[43] Naji M, Firoozi AA, Firoozi AA. A review: Study of integral abutment bridge with consideration of soilstructure interaction. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures. 2020a; **17**:e252. DOI: 10.1590/1679-78255869

[44] Stefanidou SP, Sextos AG, Kotsoglou AN, Lesgidis N, Kappos AJ. Soilstructure interaction effects in analysis of seismic fragility of bridges using an intensity-based ground motion selection procedure. Engineering Structures. 2017; **151**:366-380. DOI: 10.1016/j. engstruct.2017.08.033

[45] Chen R, Congress SSC, Cai G, Duan W, Liu S. Sustainable utilization of biomass waste-rice husk ash as a new solidified material of soil in geotechnical engineering: A review. Construction and Building Materials. 2021;**292**:123219. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123219

[46] Li Y, Sun H, Li D, Song J, Ding R. Effects of digital technology adoption on sustainability performance in construction projects: The mediating role of stakeholder collaboration. Journal of Management in Engineering. 2022;**38**(3): 04022016. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE) ME.1943-5479.0001040

[47] Naji M, Firoozi AA, et al. "Soil arching" for piled embankments: Insights from stress redistribution behaviour of DEM modelling. Acta Geotechnica. 2020b;**15**:2117-2136. DOI: 10.1007/s11440-019-00902-x

[48] Brunelli A et al. Numerical simulation of the seismic response and soil–structure interaction for a monitored masonry school building

damaged by the 2016 Central Italy earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 2021;**19**(2):1181-1211. DOI: 10.1007/s10518-020-00980-3

[49] Van Ballegooy S, Malan P, Lacrosse V, Jacka ME, Cubrinovski M, Bray JD, et al. Assessment of liquefaction-induced land damage for residential Christchurch. Earthquake Spectra. 2014; **30**(1):31-55. DOI: 10.1193/ 031813EQS070M

[50] Al-Atroush ME, Sebaey TA. Stabilization of expansive soil using hydrophobic polyurethane foam: A review. Transportation Geotechnics. 2021;**27**:100494. DOI: 10.1016/j. trgeo.2020.100494

[51] Saif A, Ahmed Sheikh K. Design of grout curtain for temporary embankments on rock foundation. Geomechanics and Geoengineering. 2022;**17**(2):426-441. DOI: 10.1080/ 17486025.2020.1778193

[52] Pacheco J, de Brito J. Recycled aggregates produced from construction and demolition waste for structural concrete: Constituents, properties and production. Materials. 2021;**14**(19):5748. DOI: 10.3390/ma14195748

[53] Parlato M, Porto SM, Cascone G. Raw earth-based building materials: An investigation on mechanical properties of Floridia soil-based adobes. Journal of Agricultural Engineering. 2021;**52**(2):1- 6. DOI: 10.4081/jae.2021.1154

[54] Han C, Yu XB. Analyses of the thermo-hydro-mechanical responses of energy pile subjected to non-isothermal heat exchange condition. Renewable Energy. 2020;**157**:150-163. DOI: 10.1016/ j.renene.2020.04.118

[55] Tang C, Phoon KK. Statistics of model factors and consideration in

*Soil-Structure Interaction: Understanding and Mitigating Challenges DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.112422*

reliability-based design of axially loaded helical piles. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 2018; **144**(8):04018050. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE) GT.1943-5606.0001894

[56] Zhang Y, Hu X, Wang Y, Jiang N. A critical review of biomineralization in environmental geotechnics: Applications, trends, and perspectives. Biogeotechnics. 2023;**2023**:100003. DOI: 10.1016/j.bgtech.2023.100003

[57] Agunwamba JC, Onyia ME, Nwonu DC. Development of expansive soil geopolymer binders for use in waste containment facility. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions. 2021;**6**:1-18. DOI: 10.1007/s41062-020-00400-0

[58] Guo D, Zhu X, Xie J, Zhang C, Zhao Z, Zheng L. Undergraduate program for urban underground space engineering in China: Exploration and practice. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2021;**116**:104084. DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2021.104084

[59] Dang LC, Khabbaz H, Ni BJ. Improving engineering characteristics of expansive soils using industry waste as a sustainable application for reuse of bagasse ash. Transportation Geotechnics. 2021;**31**:100637. DOI: 10.1016/j. trgeo.2021.100637

[60] Liu L, Cai G, Zhang J, Liu X, Liu K. Evaluation of engineering properties and environmental effect of recycled waste tire-sand/soil in geotechnical engineering: A compressive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2020;**126**:109831. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109831

[61] Cheng F, Sun X, Wu P, Chen Z, Yu T, Liu W, et al. A fully coupled thermohydro-mechanical-chemical model for methane hydrate bearing sediments considering the effect of ice. Journal of

Marine Science and Engineering. 2023;**11** (4):766. DOI: 10.3390/jmse11040766

[62] Pan Y, Zhang L. Roles of artificial intelligence in construction engineering and management: A critical review and future trends. Automation in Construction. 2021;**122**:103517. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103517

[63] Sigahi TF, Sznelwar LI. From isolated actions to systemic transformations: Exploring innovative initiatives on engineering education for sustainable development in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2023;**384**: 135659. DOI: 10.1016/j. jclepro.2022.135659

[64] Naji M, Firoozi AA. Performance of bridge envelope during earthquake using finite element and artificial neural network techniques. The Open Civil Engineering Journal. 2022;**16**(1):1-26. DOI: 10.2174/18741495-v16-e2208100

## **Chapter 5**
