Achille Tendon Rupture

## **Chapter 6**

## Functional Rehabilitation after Achilles Tendon Rupture

*Andrej Čretnik*

#### **Abstract**

Optimal treatment of an acute Achilles tendon rupture remains controversial. There's but a clear tendency that either treated conservatively or operatively, patients should start as soon as possible with early functional rehabilitation. It should include an early range of motion exercises and controlled weightbearing protocol with the support of crutches. Softcast brace is a simple, effective, removable, individually adapted, and well-tolerated orthosis, that can be easily made, if necessary, replaced or changed, and safely used during the healing process and if necessary, in the further rehabilitation period. Proposed rehabilitation protocol with the use of a softcast brace can be used either in conservatively or operatively treated patients, with comparable results in terms of complication rate (reruptures, thromboembolic events, sural neuritis) and long-term clinical (ROM, length of tendon) and functional results (return to pre-injured activities).

**Keywords:** achilles tendon, rupture, functional rehabilitation, softcast brace, ROM exercises

#### **1. Introduction**

Controversy regarding the optimal treatment of an acute complete Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) remains despite great interest and several articles in the last decades. Treatment can be broadly classified into conservative management with cast immobilization or functional bracing [1–6] and operative management with open repair (with or without augmentation) [1–3, 5–7], or minimally invasive procedures with closed percutaneous repair [8–11], or semi-open techniques [12–15], with possible ultrasonography guidance [16, 17], or endoscopic control [18–20]. There are several postoperative rehabilitation protocols—traditionally, nonweightbearing, bellow knee cast immobilization is generally recommended for 6 to 8 weeks [1, 2, 6], that has changed in the last decades in mainly functional accelerated rehabilitation with functional bracing (including early ankle motion exercises and weightbearing) for the same period [2–5, 13, 16, 21–24].

Meta-analyses and quantitative reviews of the literature regarding the management of ATRs have shown that open-operative treatment was associated with a lower risk of re-rupture (pooled rate in the literature range from 1.4 to 5% [25–34]) than nonoperative management (pooled rate of re-rupture in the literature range from 2.4 to 13% [25–27, 29–35]. Systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials involving 944 patients and 19 observational studies, including 14,918 patients showed a significant reduction in re-ruptures after operative treatment (2.3%)

compared with nonoperative treatment (3.9%) (risk difference 1.6%; risk ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.31 to 0.60; p < 0.001; I2 = 22%), but with significantly higher complication rate in operative than nonoperative treatment (4.9 vs. 1.6%; risk difference 3.3%; risk ratio 2.76, 1.84 to 4.13; p < 0.001; I2 = 45%) [36]. The risk of complications could be possibly diminished by percutaneous repair (pooled rate of 26.1% in the open group vs. pooled rate of 8.3% in the percutaneous group) [30].

The concept of early dynamic functional rehabilitation has dramatically changed the results in a term of re-rupture rate, particularly in conservative treatment of ATR [4, 23, 37]. Meta-analysis of 10 randomized trials in 418 surgically treated patients and in 408 patients who underwent nonsurgical treatment showed that if functional rehabilitation with early range of motion (ROM) was employed, re-rupture rates were equal for surgical and nonsurgical patients (risk difference = 1.7%, p = 0.45), [37]. If such early ROM was not employed, the absolute risk reduction achieved by surgery was 8.8% (p = 0.001 in favor of surgery) [37]. Similar findings were also found in the largest systematic review and meta-analysis, with no statistically significant difference in re-rupture rate between operative and nonoperative treatment in studies that used accelerated functional rehabilitation (risk ratio 0.60, 0.26 to 1.37; p = 0.23; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) [36]. The beneficial impact of early dynamic functional rehabilitation has been proven only by both, early weightbearing and ankle motion exercises [38].

#### **2. Functional rehabilitation after Achilles tendon rupture**

#### **2.1 Immobilization and orthoses**

According to the literature, there are several options available for functional treatment after ATR. Generally, they can be divided into different, mainly individually (custom) made splints, (semi)casts or orthoses from cast or different plastic materials and various special shoes, boots, or walkers (**Figures 1** and **2**) and prefabricated braces and orthoses, manufactured by different medical companies.

As functional rehabilitation should consist of early weightbearing and range of motion (ROM) exercises, there are various solutions proposed for that among previously listed types of immobilization. In rigid types of semi-casts, at least two different casts should be made—first in the plantar flexion of foot for about 25 to 30 degrees and after 3 weeks in the neutral position. In the last decades, plantar flexion is recommended to be changed every second week— every time for about 10 degrees, so at the end of a period of 6-weeks of immobilization, a neutral position of the foot could be achieved, with gradually increased tension to the injured AT, what seems to bring a beneficial effect to the strength and therefore to lower re-rupture rate [23, 37, 39, 40]. In orthoses, made from softcast or soft-plastic materials, reduction of the plantar flexion of the foot to a neutral position can be gradually achieved with the softening of the orthosis with the increased weightbearing and thus providing all the time the increase of the tension to the injured AT, with the same possibly beneficial effect of reducing the re-rupture rate [39].

In various special shoes, boots, or walkers' plantar flexion can be achieved with the added special heel lifts that can be diminished every week by 0.5 cm or every 2 weeks for 1 cm (**Figure 2**). Some of these special boots or walkers have a hinge at the level of tibiotalar joint, which can be locked in a desired position or can restrict plantar flexion at the beginning from 30 to 50 degrees and then gradually every week more, toward 0 to 50 degrees (**Figure 3**). With the addition of heel lift, early controlled weightbearing can be achieved, too.

*Functional Rehabilitation after Achilles Tendon Rupture DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.111568*

#### **2.2 Softcast functional orthosis**

Simple, but effective and individually adjusted orthosis is presented on **Figures 4**–**6**. It can be used in conservative as well as in operative treatment, whether in an open or minimally invasive way. Generally, it's applied with the foot at 25 degrees PF. Long stockinette (3 M, St. Paul, MN) (**Figure 4**) is dorsally covered with the splint, made of several (5) folded layers of Softcast (3 M, St. Paul, MN) (**Figure 5**). The splint is fixed with a folded stockinette or a simple (additional) bandage, which enables patients to perform PF and prevents dorsiflexion (DF) (**Figure 6**).

#### **2.3 Rehabilitation protocol**

Patients are immediately allowed to walk with crutches in a toe-touch technique. In the next 2 to 3 days, they can carefully increase weightbearing (WB) to 5 kg and then every week for an additional 5 kg, reaching so 15 kg of weightbearing within first 3 weeks (about 25% of body-weight (BW)). They should be immediately encouraged also to perform ROM exercises, as much as their immobilization allows (**Figure 6**).

After a week, patients are allowed to take off and on brace during the day and to perform careful PF and DF between 25 and 50 degrees in a seating position (in water without orthosis). The useful tip should be recommended to the patients, to perform ROM exercises and weightbearing only until the pain is felt.

After 2 weeks, patients should be encouraged to continue with increasing weightbearing for 5 kg every week, continuously with gradation until pain is felt.

**Figure 2.** *Heel support.*

**Figure 3.** *Walker with the locking mechanism.*

**Figure 4.** *Softcast functional orthosis—Preparation with stockinette).*

**Figure 5.** *Softcast functional orthosis–folding stockinette.*

After 4 week, they can start with weightbearing as much as tolerated and if they have no pain, they can start to walk even without crutches but should be very cautious if walking on a wet or slippery floor. Softcast (functional) immobilization routinely softens with weightbearing, so there is no need to exchange this type of immobilization to achieve a neutral position of the foot. On the other hand, this is also a way of controlling patients about weightbearing.

Bilateral seated ROM exercises, with a progressive increase of dorsiflexion and force (pain) controlled pushing knee by hands (ankle down until pain is felt), should

#### **Figure 6.** *ROM exercises—Plantar flexion in orthosis.*

be encouraged according to the protocol in **Table 1** to reach a neutral position of the foot within 6 weeks (**Figures 6** and **7**).

After 6 weeks, immobilization can be removed, and patients should start with the rehabilitation protocol (learned and controlled by physiotherapists). They may walk without crutches, with progressively increasing weightbearing (till tolerable pain). ROM exercises with increasing DF above the neutral position should also be performed carefully—it's recommended till 8 weeks in the sitting position and if possible, in the water.

Special attention should be given to incorrect gait patterns. Generally, no additional heel pad or cushion is recommended. Patients should be encouraged to perform as much as possible exercises in the whirlpool, where full weightbearing is allowed.

Careful stretching exercises and controlled squats with a lifted heel could be started after 8 weeks with careful increasing of the load (until pain is felt). Full active dorsiflexion is expected to be reached after 4 months. Raising on toes or heels with the operated leg only is generally allowed 12 weeks after the operation. Sports activities should be carefully started and individually adjusted after 3 months, with recommended full loading 6 months after the operation. Steps in rehabilitation are summarized in **Table 1**.

Proposed early dynamic functional rehabilitation with softcast orthosis can be successfully implemented with conservative as well as other open, semi-open, or closed percutaneous methods, too, as there are no contraindications for this type of treatment.

Long-term results with the use of proposed early dynamic functional rehabilitation, together with the closed percutaneous repair under local anesthesia, can be compared to other methods of ATR in terms of complication rate (re-ruptures, thromboembolic events, sural neuritis, etc.) and long term clinical (ROM, length of tendon) and functional results (strength and return to pre-injured activities) [16, 39].

## **2.4 Functional rehabilitation program (never exceed pain)**


**Table 1.**

*Rehabilitation protocol in steps.*

**Figure 7.** *Pushing knee in a seated position—Increasing dorsiflexion of ankle.*

## **3. Discussion**

Restoration of the length and tension of the ruptured AT with the return to preinjury activities with as less complications as possible should be the goals of the treatment of ATR. As in complete ATR, there always come to retraction of the triceps muscle. Consequently, a gap (elongated tendon) remains between torn ends, which heals in conservative treatment with fibrous tissue [16, 39]. Due to biomechanical characteristics of the musculotendinous complex, elongation of less than 0.5 cm seems not to affect AT function in basic daily activities but might be important in highcaliber athletes [16, 39, 41–43]. Open surgical repair enables restoration of the original length, together with tendon augmentation, but poses a higher risk for complications [5, 7, 16]. Percutaneous repair, particularly semi-open with the possible control of the length (Achillon® system (Integra Life Sciences Corporation, Plainsboro, NJ), PARS™ system (Arthrex, Naples, FL), Achilles midsubstance Speed Bridge repair variation (Arthrex, Naples, FL) [12–15] or closed percutaneous repair with ultrasonographical control [10, 16, 17, 39], seems to bridge the gap, particularly with reducing the overall number of complications.

The results of studies support a beneficial effect of early functional rehabilitation with all types of ATR treatment. Wu et al. found in their systematic review and network meta-analysis of 2060 patients in 29 randomized controlled trials 7.41% of overall complication rates in the group of open surgery and accelerated rehabilitation in comparison to 8.47% in the group of minimally invasive surgery and accelerated rehabilitation, 12.09% in nonsurgery group and accelerated rehabilitation and 13.97% in nonsurgery group and early immobilization [44].

It has to be stressed that weightbearing and early ROM exercises before the healing of an ATR could have some detrimental effects, too. Eliasson et al. found in their study that ruptured AT elongates for 6 months after surgical repair regardless of early or late

#### *Functional Rehabilitation after Achilles Tendon Rupture DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.111568*

weightbearing in combination with ankle mobilization [45]. Kangas et al. and Mortensen et al. also showed separation of the tendon ends during the postoperative period and Lee et al. and Clanton et al. warned in their studies about gapping in cycling loading, which might cause tendon elongation [22, 46–48]. Weakness of plantar flexion strength, together with a deficit in heel-rise test in patients with ATR could therefore be explained with tendon elongation [49, 50].

Strength of the tendon repair with the resistance to elongation during loading could possibly have an impact on the final results, so generally with any type of operative treatment, the strongest repair should be considered [39].

Probably the simplest way to achieve the goals of accelerated rehabilitation (early weightbearing with early ROM exercises), could be the adjustment of all activities to the proportion of pain. Proposed kg of weightbearing in weekly intervals should probably serve only as a sort of general recommendation, which should be individually adjusted (according to body weight), as it has no sense to compare 5 kg of weightbearing in 100 kg body-weight man, with a lady of 50 kg body-weight.

Functional treatment with early ankle motion and early weightbearing might have an impact on the negative effect of immobilization and thus risk for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) [39]. There is but no clear consensus about the incidence of VTE and prophylaxis in patients after ATR and it seems that patient-specific risk factors for VTE should be assessed individually [51–54]. The American College of Chest Physicians' (ACCP) review recommends against chemical prophylaxis in lower leg injuries requiring immobilization [53]. Functional treatment and early ankle motion could support this decision easier.

#### **4. Conclusion**

Controversy regarding optimal treatment after ATR remains. There's but clear tendency that either treated conservatively or operatively, patients should start as soon as possible with early functional rehabilitation.

Softcast brace is a simple, cheap, effective, removable, individually adapted, and well-tolerated orthosis, that can be easily made and safely used, together with the use of crutches, during the healing and rehabilitation process of the ruptured AT.

Long-term results support the choice of the proposed functional method for the patients with acute, complete ATR as the method that brings promising end functional results, with a low rate of complications.

*Foot and Ankle Disorders – Pathology and Surgery*

## **Author details**

Andrej Čretnik Department of Traumatology, University Clinical Center, Maribor, Slovenia

\*Address all correspondence to: andrej.cretnik@guest.arnes.si

© 2023 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

*Functional Rehabilitation after Achilles Tendon Rupture DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.111568*

## **References**

[1] Cetti R, Christensen SE, Ejsted R. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1993;**21**:791-799

[2] Nilsson-Helander K, Silbernagel KG, Thomeé R, Faxén E, Olsson N, Eriksson BI, et al. Acute Achilles tendon rupture: A randomized, controlled study comparing surgical and nonsurgical treatments using validated outcome measures. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2010;**38**:2186-2193

[3] Willits K, Amendola A, Bryant D, Mohtadi NG, Giffin JR, Fowler P, et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: A multicenter randomized trial using accelerated functional rehabilitation. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American. 2010;**92**(17): 2767-2775

[4] Wallace RGH, Heyes GJ, Michael ALR. The non-operative functional management of patients with a rupture of the tendo Achillis leads to low rates of rerupture. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British. 2011;**93**: 1362-1366

[5] Olsson N, Silbernagel KG, Eriksson BI, Sansone M, Brorsson A, Nilsson-Hellander K, et al. Stable surgical repair with accelerated rehabilitation versus nonsurgical treatment for acute Achilles tendon ruptures: A randomized controlled study. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2013;**41**:2867-2876

[6] Lantto I, Heikkinen J, Flinkkila T, Ohtonen P, Siira P, Laine V, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing surgical and nonsurgical treatments of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. The

American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2016;**44**:2406-2414

[7] Heikkinen J, Lantto I, Flinkkila T, Ohtonen P, Pajala A, Siira P, et al. Augmented compared with nonaugmented surgical repair after total Achilles rupture: Results of a prospective randomized trial with thirteen or more years of follow-up. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American. 2016;**98**:85-92

[8] Ma GWC, Griffith TG. Percutaneous repair of acute closed ruptured Achilles tendon: A new technique. Clinical Orthopaedics. 1977;**128**:247-255

[9] Kosanović M, Čretnik A, Batišta M. Subcutaneous suturing of the ruptured Achilles tendon under local anesthesia. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 1994;**113**:177-179

[10] Čretnik A, Smrkolj V, Kosanović M. Percutaneous suturing of the ruptured Achilles tendon under local anesthesia. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2004;**43**(2):72-81

[11] Amlang MH, Christiani P, Heinz P, Zwipp H. The percutaneous suture of the Achilles tendon with the Dresden instrument. Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie. 2006;**18**(4): 287-299

[12] Kakiuchi M. A combined open and percutaneous technique for repair of tendon Achillis. Comparison with open repair. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1995;**77B**:60-63

[13] Buchgraber A, Pässler HH. Percutaneous repair of Achilles tendon rupture. Immobilization versus functional postoperative treatment. Clinical Orthopaedics. 1997;**341**:113-122 [14] Assal M, Jung M, Stern R, Rippstein P, Delmi M, Hoffmeyer P. Limited open repair of Achilles tendon ruptures. A technique with a new instrument and findings of a prospective multicenter study. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 2002;**84A**:161-170

[15] Hsu AR, Jones CP, Cohen BE, Davis WH, Ellington JK, Anderson RB. Clinical outcomes and complications of percutaneous Achilles repair system versus open technique for acute Achilles tendon rupture. Foot & Ankle International. 2015;**36**:1279-1286

[16] Čretnik A, Smrkolj V, Kosanović M. Percutaneous versus open repair of the ruptured Achilles tendon. A comparative study. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2005;**33**:1369-1379

[17] Soubeyrand M, Serra-Tosio G, Campagna R, Molina V, Sitbon P, Biau DJ. Intraoperative ultrasonography during percutaneous Achilles tendon repair. Foot and Ankle International. 2010;**31**(12):1069-1074

[18] Halasi T, Tallay A, Berkes I. Percutaneous Achilles tendon repair with and without endoscopic control. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2003;**11**:409-414

[19] Tang KL, Therman H, Dai G, Chen GX, Guo L, Yang L. Arthroscopically assisted percutaneous repair of fresh closed Achilles tendon rupture by Kessler's suture. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2007;**35**:589-596

[20] Doral MN, Bozkurt M, Turhan E, Ayvaz M, Atay OA, Uzumcugil A, et al. Percutaneous suturing of the ruptured Achilles tendon using endoscopic control. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2009;**129**: 1093-1101

[21] McComis GP, Nawoczenski DA, DeHaven KE. Functional bracing for rupture of the Achilles tendon. Clinical results and analysis of ground-reaction forces and temporal data. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1997;**79A**:1799-1808

[22] Mortensen HM, Skov O, Jensen PE. Early motion of the ankle after operative treatment of a rupture of the Achilles tendon. A prospective, randomized clinical and radiographic study. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American. 1999;**81**:983-990

[23] Twaddle BC, Poon P. Early motion for Achilles tendon ruptures: Is surgery important? A randomized prospective study. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2007;**35**(12):2033-2038

[24] Lantto I, Heikkinen J, Flinkkila T, Ohtonen P, Kangas J, Siira P, et al. Early functional treatment versus cast immobilization in tension after achilles rupture repair: Results of a prospective randomized trial with 10 or more years of follow-up. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2015;**43**:2302-2309

[25] Wong J, Barrass V, Maffulli N. Quantitative review of operative and nonoperative management of Achilles tendon ruptures. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2002;**30**:565-575

[26] Wang D, Sandlin MI, Cohen JR, Lord EL, Petrigliano FA, Nelson F, et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: An analysis of 12,570 patients in a large healthcare database. Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2017;**21**:250-253

[27] Kocher MS, Bishop J, Marshall R, Briggs KK, Hawkins RJ. Operative versus nonoperative management of acute achilles tendon rupture. Expected-value decision analysis. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2002;**30**:783-790

*Functional Rehabilitation after Achilles Tendon Rupture DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.111568*

[28] Attia AK, Mahmoud K, d'Hooghe P, Bariteau J, Labib SA, Myerson MS. Outcomes and complications of open versus minimally invasive repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2021;**49**:1-12. DOI: 10.1177/03635465211053619

[29] Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Siddiqui F, Morrow F, Busse J, Leighton RK, et al. Treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: A systematic overview and meta-analysis. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2002;**400**: 190-200

[30] Khan RJ, Fick D, Keogh A, Crawford J, Brammar T, Parker M. Treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American. 2005;**87**:2202-2210

[31] Wilkins R, Bisson LJ. Operative versus nonoperative management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: A quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2012;**40**:2154-2160

[32] Deng S, Sun Z, Zhang C, Chen G, Li J. Surgical treatment versus conservative management for acute Achilles tendon rupture: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2017;**56**: 1236-1243

[33] van der Eng DM, Schepers T, Goslings JC, Schep NW. Rerupture rate after early weightbearing in operative versus conservative treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures: A metaanalysis. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2013;**52**:622-628

[34] Jones MP, Khan RJ, Carey Smith RL. Surgical interventions for treating acute achilles tendon rupture: Key findings from a recent Cochrane review. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American. 2012;**94**:e88

[35] Khan RJ, Carey Smith RL. Surgical interventions for treating acute Achilles tendon ruptures. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010;**9**: CD003674

[36] Ochen Y, Beks RB, van Heijl M, Hietbrink F, Leenen LPH, van der Velde D, et al. Operative treatment versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019; **364**:k5120

[37] Soroceanu A, Sidhwa F, Aarabi S, Kaufman A, Glazebrook M. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American. 2012;**94**: 2136-2143

[38] Huang J, Wang C, Ma X, Wang X, Zhang C, Chen L. Rehabilitation regimen after surgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: A systematic review with meta-analysis. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2015;**43**: 1008-1016

[39] Čretnik A, Kosanović M, Košir R. Long-term results with the use of modified percutaneous repair of the ruptured Achilles tendon under local anaesthesia: (15-year analysis with 270 cases). The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2019;**58**:828-836

[40] Costa MI, Achten J, Dutton S, Lamb SE, Ollivere B, Maredza M, et al. Plaster cast versus functional brace for non-surgical treatment of Achilles tendon rupture (UKSTAR): A

multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation. Lancet. 2020; **395**:441-448

[41] Kangas JA, Pajala A, Siira P, Hamalainen M, Leppilahti J. Early functional treatment versus early immobilization in tension of the musculotendinous unit after Achilles rupture repair: A prospective randomized, clinical study. The Journal of Trauma. 2003;**54**:1171-1180

[42] Zellers JA, Carmont MR, Silbernagel KG. Return to play post-Achilles tendon rupture: A systematic review and meta-analysis of rate and measures of return to play. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2016;**50**: 1325-1332

[43] Trofa DP, Miller JC, Jang ES, Woode DR, Greisberg JK, Vosseller JT. Professional Athletes' return to play and performance after operative repair of an Achilles tendon rupture. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2017;**45**: 2864-2871

[44] Wu Y, Mu Y, Yin L, Wang Z, Liu W, Wan H. Complications in the management of acute Achilles tendon rupture. A systematic review and network meta-analysis of 2060 patients. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2019;**40**:2154-2160

[45] Eliasson PT, Agergaard A, Couppe C, Svensson R, Hoeffner R, Warming S, et al. The ruptured Achilles tendon elongates for 6 months after surgical repair regardless of early or late weightbearing in combination with ankle mobilization: A randomized clinical trial. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2018;**46**:2492-2502

[46] Kangas J, Pajala A, Ohtonen P, Leppilahti J. Achilles tendon elongation after rupture repair: A randomized

comparison of 2 postoperative regimens. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2007;**35**:59-64

[47] Lee SJ, Sileo MJ, Kremenic IJ, Orishimo K, Ben-Avi S, Nicholas SJ, et al. Cyclic loading of 3 Achilles tendon repairs simulating early postoperative forces. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2009;**37**:786-790

[48] Clanton TO, Haytmanek CT, Williams BT, Civitaresse DM, Turnbull TL, Massey MB, et al. A biomechanical comparison of an open repair and 3 minimally invasive percutaneous Achilles tendon repairs during a simulated progressive rehabilitation protocol. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2015;**43**: 1957-1964

[49] Silbernagel KG, Steele R, Manal K. Deficits in heel-rise height and Achilles tendon elongation occur in patients recovering from an Achilles tendon rupture. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2012;**40**:1564-1571

[50] Rosso C, Vavken P, Polzer C, Buckland DM, Studler U, Weisskopf L, et al. Long-term outcomes of muscle volume and Achilles tendon length after Achilles tendon ruptures. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2013;**21**:1369-1377

[51] Aufwerber S, Heijne A, Edman G, Silbernagel KG, Ackermann PW. Early mobilization does not reduce the risk of deep venous thrombosis after Achilles tendon rupture: A randomized controlled trial. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2020;**28**: 312-319

[52] Calder JDF, Freeman R, Domeij-Arverud E, van Dijk CN, Ackermannn PW. Meta-analysis and suggested guidelines for prevention of *Functional Rehabilitation after Achilles Tendon Rupture DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.111568*

venous thromboembolism (VTE) in foot and ankle surgery. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2016;**24**: 1409-1420

[53] Falck-Ytter Y, Francis CW, Johanson NA, Curley C, Dahl OE, Schulman S, et al. Prevention of VTE in orthopedic surgery patients: Antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2012; **141**(2 Suppl):278S-325S

[54] Patel A, Ogawa B, Charlton T, Thordarson D. Incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism after Achilles tendon rupture. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2012;**470**:270-274

## *Edited by Dimitrios D. Nikolopoulos and George K. Safos*

The number of cases of foot and ankle pathology and disorders has increased in the last two decades due to the way of life of the current human beings. On the one hand, there is the trauma category because of motorbike and car accidents; and on the other hand is the chronic syndromes due to everyday overuse of foot and ankle, as in high-demand sports and hobbies, as also in ballet dancing, etc. This book offers an updated guide to foot and ankle pathology and presents everyday trauma categories, as well as chondral and joint chronic syndromes at all ages from childhood to adulthood. Furthermore, the book will allow the reader to evaluate and realize how the foot changes during development from the early stages to adulthood. It also provides an overall outline of the anatomy and foot biomechanics, diagnosis of the pathologies, open or arthroscopic surgical approaches, treatment alternatives, and complications. *Foot and Ankle Disorders - Pathology and Surgery* will be of major interest for orthopedic residents, as well as for orthopedic surgeons at the first steps of their career, and for experienced ones seeking updated information.

Published in London, UK © 2023 IntechOpen © cafaphotos / iStock

Foot and Ankle Disorders - Pathology and Surgery

Foot and Ankle Disorders

Pathology and Surgery

*Edited by Dimitrios D. Nikolopoulos* 

*and George K. Safos*