*Classification Models for Preventing Juvenile Crimes Committed with Malware Apps DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.107188*

the uncertainties that surround the level of his/her "inadvertently act" through the unawareness or awareness of his/her legal duties in the society. The second issues is whether the child can be charged (or not charged) for his/her failure to take action (or not to take action) in the context of criminal liability" are purely determined by the prosecutor, judge and the defendant(s) of the case.

Some criminal laws may not actually forbid children from playing with the mobile phones and Internet-enabled computers of their parents, guardians and fosters at home. So, the determination of the mental element (guilty mind) of the perpetrator (or a child accused of juvenile crimes committed with malware apps) and the issue of "joint criminal liability" among two or more children require rigorous exercises. This is because studies have shown that most statutory documents have not clearly clarified the concept of "guilty mind" in the above context.

A child that was playing with his/her parent's phone may not have 'purposely', 'recklessly', 'knowingly', 'negligently', 'carelessly' or 'neglectfully' infringed the privacy of another person. The rationale for accusing, adjudging or acquitting a child of being guilty (or not guilty) of malware crimes may seem absurd in legal and media settings if the elements of the crime are improperly substantiated beyond reasonable doubt. The approach that media adopts to present and deal with the issue of juvenile crimes with malware apps and transmit them to the society worth consideration. This understanding is that the media has the power to reshape the youth and the society's knowledge and understanding about juvenile crimes and social issues that come with them. These can in turn influence the formulation of regulatory legislations and their interpretations on the above social and legal issues. In essence, juvenile crimes committed with malware apps are subsets of other kinds of global crimes committed by vulnerable young and adult people. Yet, with inadequate legal frameworks in the global community, recent topical studies have shown that there are several refutable uncertainties about the above concepts and the statistical relationships of the entities that essentially constitute and underlie the various elements of the juvenile crimes committed with malware apps across the globe [16].
