**4. Conclusion**

From our research experience in informal territories, we propose a housing program for the Chilean government system that collects differentiated residential demands and allows vulnerable population to leave housing informality. In its range of areas, mobile housing recognizes the factors that drive the creation of informal territories, including the restrictive prices to access the private housing market, the difficulties faced by the state in producing social housing, in addition to the diversity of households that cannot afford none of the above options. From the geographical

conditions where massive informal territories are settled, mobile housing seeks for inhabitants to live in safe conditions against disaster risks, even temporarily. This implies rethinking how the risk of disaster is reduced in homes located under certain climatic, edaphic, and arboreal conditions. It is crucial to propose how to build houses resistant to intense rains and humidity conditions, and to water scarcity and intense solar exposure. With this, mobile housing requires generating soil mechanics in seismic risk areas, while in areas with tsunami risk, establish the obligation to build highrise homes where the habitable sections begin on the second floors. As noted above, about the risk of mudflow, mobile housing proposes the construction of furrows that surround the houses and water sinks, in addition to afforestation to stabilize the soil on slopes. Therefore, mobile housing and its proposals seek to configure a housing typology that can be replicated in any territory where institutions are expected to reduce disaster risk. Consequently, mobile housing also requires the Chilean state to stop actions that perpetuate the exposure to risks of vulnerable families, who after experiencing disasters are moved to new homes exposed to other hazards1 .

To conclude, in addition to being a housing program, mobile housing is also a theoretical-methodological concept that conceives housing as an object and subject, but which is inserted in territories with particular conditions. This multi-scale perspective highlights that inhabiting a space is not limited to housing as a productive and reproductive place, but also involves its surroundings. That explains the multiple proposals presented, which, above all, would favor living under the basic conditions of comfort that adequate housing requires. With this, we consider the future potential of mobile housing to reduce the housing deficit in all its stages, for example, allowing the state to effectively have land reserves, proposing resilient and adaptable housing models, in addition to the existence of risk mitigation subsidies that improve constructions without discriminating informal settlements or slums. Finally, mobile housing is an initial and exploratory exercise that also challenges the development of housing policies from an interdisciplinary perspective with the purpose of finding integral solutions.
