**6. Discussion**

The results in Sections 4 and 5 are discussed in terms of PGA, SA02, SA10 (hazard maps), and damage distribution maps (loss assessment) of buildings, with comparisons between attenuation relationships (CY2014) and the distribution maps generated from data recorded by the strong motion network in İstanbul during the *Mw* 5.8 Silivri earthquake.


which seismic risk was considered to be higher. Because most stations were away from the event epicenter, 716 strong motion stations were not triggered.

