The Effect of Ultrasonic Waves on Crude Oil Recovery

*Ramin Tahmasebi-Boldaji*

### **Abstract**

In recent years, ultrasonic technology has played an important role in the development of oil fields, which has improved oil recovery. Ultrasonic waves are a very suitable method for producing oil at a low cost and without environmental pollution. The reservoir is treated using high-power sonication, which affects the physical properties of the oil and thus improves the permeability, which increases the oil recovery. The ultrasonic technique is also used to reduce the damage of the formation in the areas near the well, and this reduces the penetration of mud and sediments. However, ultrasonic waves remove oil barriers to the well and improve oil recovery for a long time. In this chapter, recent developments and laboratory and field results of ultrasonic waves in improving oil recovery will be discussed, and it will be shown that these waves are highly efficient.

**Keywords:** crude oil recovery, viscosity, ultrasonic waves, environmental pollution, ultrasound

### **1. Introduction**

In the world, energy is the main condition for the development of human society. Oil, gas, and coal are the main sources of energy that have led to the development of human civilization in recent years [1]. Given that the demand for energy from these energy systems and the severe problems and challenges in the oil and gas industry are increasing day by day, the oil production capacity cannot meet this volume of demand. Also, because oil prices are high in the world, it has affected the oil market and the structure of international cooperation in this industry [1, 2]. However, the continuous reduction of hydrocarbons is an undeniable issue and serious efforts should be made to solve its problems [3]. Reduction in production can occur for two reasons: 1) reduction in reservoir pressure and 2) formation damage. Sedimentation of asphaltene and wax on rocks can occur due to the flow of drilling fluids, which is called formation damage. Damage formation is one of the main reasons for reducing the productivity of oil wells and has adverse effects on well production. Various techniques have been performed to eliminate formation damage. These techniques include high-pressure fractures and acid and solvent injections, which often have many disadvantages, including high cost, extensive facilities, and environmental problems [4, 5]. New and effective technologies have been developed to solve the mentioned problems in the oil industry. Ultrasonic oil recovery technology is one of the most effective solutions developed in the USA in the 1950s [6]. The ultrasonic

technique and the use of its waves have desirable advantages such as low pollution, cheap, high efficiency, and environmentally friendly. Impurities and sediments in oil exploitation reduce oil flow and thus reduce production [7]. For this purpose, highpower ultrasonic waves are used to increase the oil permeability, which destroys the oil layer particles and increases the permeability by creating high sound acceleration [8]. Oil recovery technology means that the sonication operation leads to a change in the physical properties of the fluid, which improves the fluid flow status [1, 2] and reduces the pressure gradient of the porous medium [9].

In this chapter, the aim is to review recent developments in ultrasonic oil recovery technology, as well as the effect of these waves on the physical properties of the fluid and the viscosity of the oil.

### **2. Advantages of ultrasonic oil recovery technology**

Due to the problems mentioned in the oil industry, the ultrasonic method is one of the suitable options for oil recovery. Oil recovery has the following advantages [7]:


This equipment is shown in detail in **Figure 1**.

### **3. Effects of sonication operation**

### **3.1 Mechanical vibration**

Ultrasonic waves have a series of mechanical effects that change the velocity of elastic particles and cause agitation, loosening, scattering, and degassing. Mechanical vibrations also cause loss of cohesion between blocked particles, resizing capillary pores and reducing surface tension. These vibrations also cause very small cracks in the rocks of the formation and cause the separation of crude oil from the rocks. Impact pressure from high-frequency, high-power ultrasonic waves accelerates large molecules such as wax, asphaltene, and colloids, breaking the chain of molecules due to inertia [10–16].

### **3.2 Cavitation**

The process of growth and collapse of hollow fluid bubbles due to sonication operations and changes in sound pressure is called cavitation. Pressures above 105 MPa can cause cavities to collapse [17]. This high pressure also causes secondary effects such as

*The Effect of Ultrasonic Waves on Crude Oil Recovery DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.106494*

**Figure 1.** *The schematic of ultrasonic oil recovery device.*

luminescence, phonation, ionization, and chemical reactions. One of the obstacles to oil flow is gas resistance. Gas resistance refers to a large number of gas cores. These gas nuclei combine to form larger bubbles, approaching the dredging target [18]. Frequent cavitation explosions occur in the fractures of the formation and on the solid surface, leading to high pressures and the consequent explosion of particles adhering to the surface. Also, due to the transverse flows of liquids and their alternating currents, particles are quickly removed from the surface [10]. However, cavitation breaks the molecular bonds of crude oil and reduces the molecular mass. Reducing the molecular mass reduces the viscosity and thus improves the fluidity of the crude oil.

### **3.3 Thermal action**

The internal friction of crude oil is the reason for the resistance of the oil flow. As the viscosity of the oil decreases, the oil concentration also decreases, leading

to improved flow. Therefore, to improve the flow of crude oil, its viscosity can be reduced, and this is possible by increasing the temperature. By absorbing ultrasonic waves, acoustic energy is converted into thermal energy, and also the boundary friction at the interface increases the temperature of the crude oil. However, at the moment of bubble collapse, a large amount of heat energy is released by cavitation, and with increasing ultrasonic frequency, the absorption of waves and boundary friction becomes more intense. Eventually, with increasing sonication power, cavitation and thermal energy become more significant [19–23].

### **4. Recent developments in sonication operations to improve oil recovery**

In recent years, various devices have been invented that can improve the recovery of crude oil by ultrasonic waves. One type of environmentally friendly viscosity reduction is shown in **Figure 2** [24, 25]. This device has a very good anti-wax and antifouling feature and is used for underground oil pumping. This device can be used to increase the flow of crude oil, which increases pump efficiency and production. This device is also suitable for wells containing different wax and water and has good safety and no pollution.

One of the problems of the oil industry is the elimination of the scale of pipelines, and to solve this problem, an electromagnetic ultrasonic antifouling device was invented [26, 27]. The schematic of this device is shown in **Figure 3** [25].

Using an ultra-strong alternating magnetic field and ultrasonic sound field, the device affects the physical morphology and chemical properties of the crude oil sediments, dispersing and loosening the sediments completely and not adhering easily to the pipe wall. Also, with the invention of this device, they achieved many advantages, which are good antifouling effect, long life, no pollution, comfortable maintenance, and environmentally friendly [26].

Due to the fact that the viscosity reducing device cannot be used for more than 25% wax content, to solve this problem, a double sonic eddy current anti-wax viscosity reduction device was invented [28]. The schematic of this device is shown in **Figure 4** [25]. This device has useful capabilities, and a two-stage ultrasonic oscillator is used to improve the sound frequency and can destroy paraffin wax crystals and lead to a great reduction in viscosity. In addition, the use of eddy currents increases the fluidity of crude oil, prevents wax deposition, and increases oil flow capacity. In the oil industry, this device can be used for vertical, sloping, and horizontal oil production wells [28]. However, to improve the transmission efficiency of all oil production systems, three special types of cables are used, which are shown in **Figure 5** [25, 29].

#### **Figure 2.**

*The structure of a kind of environmentally friendly, anti-wax, and antiscaling viscosity reduction device [24, 25].*

*The Effect of Ultrasonic Waves on Crude Oil Recovery DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.106494*

#### **Figure 3.**

*The structure of electromagnetic ultrasonic antiscaling device [25].*

**Figure 4.** *The structure of double sonic eddy current anti-wax viscosity reduction device [25].*

### **4.1 The effect of different ultrasonic parameters on viscosity and oil recovery efficiency**

Recently, important studies and results have been obtained in the field of improving the recovery of crude oil using ultrasonic waves. Various ultrasonic parameters can have a significant impact on improving crude oil recovery. These parameters include cavitation, temperature, time, power, and frequency. Each of these parameters has a significant effect on crude oil recovery, which must be optimized for each specific operating condition of these parameters in order to achieve maximum recovery. In this section, the explanation and effect of these parameters are discussed.

### *4.1.1 The effect of ultrasonic temperature and cavitation*

In a previous study, an ultrasound cleaning tank was used to separate oil from sludge [30]. Ultrasonic waves can separate solid particles from crude oil [31]. The results were obtained after deoiling the oil sludge, and the oil content increases when the temperature is above 40°C. However, too high temperature weakens cavitation and delays the separation of solid particles from crude oil [32]. That is, from the temperature range of 30 to 40°C, the cavitation intensity increases and reaches its maximum value at 40°C, and then with increasing temperature from 40 to 60°C, the cavitation intensity decreases and reaches a constant rate [30]. As a result, it can be said that cavitation has a maximum value at low temperature (40°C), and high temperature (>40°C) is suitable for molecular motion and increases the number of cavitation nuclei [30]. Also, the oil content increases in the range of acoustic pressure

*Three kinds of special cables for improving transmission efficiency of the whole oil production system [25, 29].*

above 0.10 MPa because cavitation increases with increasing acoustic pressure [33]. Temperature, power, and frequency parameters of 40° C, 0.1 MPa, and 25 kHz, respectively, can increase the oil recovery rate by 55.6% [30]. The optimal conditions for these parameters must be determined. The optimum conditions for oil sludge treatment for frequency, intensity, power, and soil-to-water ratio are 25 kHz, 0.33 W/ Cm2 , 300 W, and 1/2, respectively [34]. With increasing temperature, the viscosity of the crude oil and the adhesion stress between the oil and the sand decrease. There is also a positive correlation between cavitation nuclei and sonication temperature. That is, the higher the temperature, the greater the number of cavitation nuclei. However, with a large increase in temperature, the internal pressure of the cavitation bubbles increases, which reduces the intensity of cavitation [35, 36].

With the radiation of ultrasonic waves, cavities are created in which large bubbles are created due to heat, and these waves cause these bubbles to collapse. The mechanical effect of this collapse causes the suspended conglomerates to disintegrate [37]. The increase in temperature and ultrasonic cavitation leads to the production of hydromechanical shear forces and causes disruption in macromolecules. These collapses that occur in the bubbles cause the creation of shear shock waves and solvent microjets that create turbulence in the surface layer around the solid particles and cause high local temperatures [38].

### *4.1.2 The effect of ultrasonic power*

High ultrasonic power is one of the main features of ultrasound in crude oil recovery. Following recent research, an ultrasonic reactor was used to purify petroleum sludge [39]. The ultrasonic reactor was able to increase the oil recovery efficiency above 90% for some samples with a power of 240 W. Given that oil recovery increases with increasing power, the further increase of ultrasonic power not only does not improve oil recovery but also leads to reduced efficiency [39]. With a further increase in power, the ultrasonic recovery does not increase. It can be concluded that

*The Effect of Ultrasonic Waves on Crude Oil Recovery DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.106494*

the cavitation phenomenon is responsible for the excretion of adsorbed molecules, and the effect of this phenomenon is affected by the size of the bubbles because larger bubbles can store more energy [35, 40, 41]. Ultrasonic cavitation is effective in inhibiting the growth of wax crystals. Ultrasonic cavitation causes long-chain alkanes to be converted to short-chain alkanes and C∙C bonds are broken [42]. Also, after the irradiation of ultrasonic waves, the content of long-chain alkanes (C16–C22) decreases and short-chain alkanes (C9 and C10) are created [43]. With the increase of light hydrocarbons, wax solubility improves and the freezing point of crude oil decreases.

However, an optimal value for ultrasonic power must be determined, and increasing the power from a certain threshold does not help to improve oil recovery [35]. Very high levels of ultrasonic power can produce a lot of acoustic energy, and the energy is converted to smaller temperatures and pressures by small bubbles, and microscopic turbulence breaks the bonds and the adsorbed molecules are expelled [44]. Also, further increase of ultrasonic power due to inhibition of cavitation microbubble size cannot improve oil recovery [39]. However, ultrasonic power can be used to increase oil recovery, and the frequency parameter must be increased to increase recovery speed [39].

#### *4.1.3 The effect of ultrasonic time*

The combined method of ultrasound and thermochemical cleaning treatment for oily sludge was also investigated in another previous study [35]. After the operation, oil layers were collected for analysis. After 15 minutes of testing, the oil recovery is 99.28% and remains constant with a further increase in recovery time. Initially, under ultrasonic radiation, oil is desorbed from the surface of the sand and an oil–water emulsion is formed at a low concentration. At the beginning of the operation, the desorption rate is high, which leads to an increase in oil recovery. However, as the oil–water emulsion concentration increases, the oil re-adsorption on the removed sand surfaces increases at the same time. Also, when the desorption rate is equal to the re-adsorption, a further increase in sonication time does not increase oil recovery [35, 45]. As the ultrasonic radiation time increases, the bubbles inside the crude oil reach a critical size and then collapse. As the bubbles increase in size and collapse, the volume of crude oil increases, leading to a decrease in viscosity [37].

#### *4.1.4 The effect of ultrasonic frequency*

Another feature of ultrasound to increase crude oil recovery is low frequency (10–35 kHz). Reducing the frequency both increases cavitation and decreases the attenuation of acoustic energy [20]. However, the lower the frequency, the easier cavitation will occur [35]. Also, two types of 28 and 40 kHz generators were examined, and according to the results, ultrasound with a frequency of 28 kHz does better than 48 kHz and this is because [30]:


Also, sonication operation has a significant effect on the viscosity of crude oil, which increases the fluidity, flow, and recovery of oil. In a study on a type of crude oil with a viscosity of 1250 MPa.s, wide ranges of frequencies from 18 to 25 kHz and power from 100 to 1000 W were investigated [46]. Ultrasonic frequencies of 18, 20, and 25 kHz can reduce the viscosity of oil by 480, 890, and 920 MPa.s, respectively [46]. Therefore, cavitation created by ultrasonic waves is able to break down heavy oil molecules into lighter hydrocarbons, and the power and irradiation time of the waves are the main parameters for reducing viscosity [46]. Another sample of crude oil with n-alkanes and tar-asphaltene compounds was examined at a resonant frequency of 24.3 kHz and a generator power of 4000 W [47]. Results were reported on the effect of ultrasonic waves on the viscosity of paraffin oils, and it was shown that these waves lead to a decrease in viscosity and pour point [47]. These results are also consistent with reports in other reports [48, 49] of reduced viscosity due to ultrasonic radiation. In another study, the rheological behavior of crude oil irradiated with ultrasonic waves was investigated [50]. Dissolution of heavy compounds in crude oil can be achieved by irradiation of ultrasonic waves with a frequency of 45 kHz and an optimal time of 45 minutes. In a recent study, we also found that the three parameters of time, power, and ultrasonic frequency have a significant effect on oil viscosity [51]. A sample of crude oil in oil reservoirs, named as Bangestan, at the Marun field, located in the south of Iran was employed for experiments. Brookfield dvz-lll ultra Rheometer was used to measure viscosity. The schematic of the equipment used is shown in **Figure 6** [51]. To produce ultrasonic waves of bath type, two ultrasonic generators were used, the first generator (YAXUN YX2000) with a frequency of 42 kHz and power of 35 and 50 W and the second generator (QUIGG SR 2014.16) with a frequency of 46 kHz and output power of 50 W. Simultaneous thermogravimetric and differential thermal analyzer (TGA/DTA Netzssh STA 409 PC LUXX) have been used to investigate the effect of ultrasonic waves on crude oil mass and thermal behavior. Crude oil viscosity was irradiated with ultrasonic waves at different times, frequencies, and power of sonication in ambient conditions, and its viscosity was measured after cooling of crude oil [51, 52]. As shown in **Figure 7** [51], the effects of three parameters of time, frequency, and ultrasonic power on the viscosity of crude

### **Figure 6.**

*Schematic of equipment used for investigating the effects of ultrasonic waves on the viscosity and thermal properties of crude oil [51].*

*The Effect of Ultrasonic Waves on Crude Oil Recovery DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.106494*

**Figure 7.** *The effect of triple ultrasonic factors on the viscosity of crude oil [51].*

oil are significant. The sonication time has the greatest effect on the viscosity and with increasing the radiation time, the viscosity decreases sharply. On the other hand, the other two parameters have little effect on the viscosity of crude oil [51]. Good results in this field can be achieved by using appropriate statistical methods, modeling and artificial intelligence [53–59].

### **4.2 Mechanism of action of ultrasonic waves**

In this section, the changes of molecular bonds of heavy crude oil due to ultrasonic radiation are analyzed. An example of a Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectrum of a sample of heavy crude oil is given in this section to investigate the effect of ultrasonic waves on the molecular bonds of crude oil (**Figure 8**) [60]. As can be seen in **Figure 8** [60], the angular vibrations of methyl and methylene are present in the wavelengths of 1378 and 1458 cm−1, respectively. A carbon–carbon double bond is observed at wavelength of 1599 cm−1 and the tensile vibration of methylene at about 2854 cm−1 and for methyl at 2952 cm−1. However, when heavy oil is exposed to ultrasonic radiation for 6 minutes, the peak intensity increases, indicating an increase in methyl functional groups. Also, the chains of heavy compounds are broken, leading to a decrease in viscosity. But, an increase in

**Figure 8.** *FTIR spectra [60].*

the time of ultrasonic radiation (12 min) reduces the intensity of the peaks. This means that due to the longer irradiation time, more long-chain molecules are converted to short-chain molecules, but due to excessive temperature and crossing the temperature threshold, light compounds evaporate and ultimately increase viscosity.

Severe cavitation can occur due to the intensity of ultrasonic radiation in heavy oil. In general, it can be said that acoustic cavitation has three main effects: mechanical, chemical, and thermal. Each of these three factors has a specific effect on oil. Thus, the mechanical agent creates a strong stirring effect and the thermal agent creates a high-temperature and high-pressure effect in the fluid. As mentioned, the contents of the functional groups increase as a result of sonication operations, which indicates that the molecular chains are broken and the heavy components of the oil are decomposed into lighter components. Reduction of heavy components and breaking of long chains due to wave radiation lead to a decrease in viscosity, which can be due to acoustic cavitation. Therefore, to better understand this issue, the carbon number distribution of three samples of heavy oil is given in **Figure 9** [60]. As the radiation time increases, the total amount of carbon, called long chains, gradually decreases. As shown in **Figure 9** [60], there are carbon chains of C40 and above C20 in heavy oil. As the ultrasonic radiation time increases, these chains are broken and the amount of carbon is reduced. This trend occurs in two other heavy oil samples, but in C11–C20 carbon the number of light carbon chains decreases with increasing time. This is for

*The Effect of Ultrasonic Waves on Crude Oil Recovery DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.106494*

**Figure 9.** *Results of carbon number distribution [60].*

the same reason as mentioned in the previous section, that as time increases, they produce excessive temperature waves that cause lighter compounds to evaporate and viscosity to increase.

### **5. Future views**

Considering many studies have been performed on the effect of different ultrasonic parameters on increasing crude oil recovery, the ultrasonic cycle parameter has not been studied in all studies. It seems that different ultrasonic cycles can help a lot in improving the recovery of crude oil in the oil industry, in future laboratory and field studies. The ultrasonic cycle section is divided into active and passive intervals. In an ultrasonic homogenizer, the number of cycles is divided from 1 to 10. Each cycle represents a unique amount of active and passive intervals. In all recent studies, the effect of these active and passive intervals has not been investigated, which is a very important parameter in the recovery of crude oil.

### **6. Summary**

This chapter examines recent developments and the effects of ultrasonic waves on viscosity and crude oil recovery. The results show that these waves with three mechanical, chemical, and thermal factors can improve oil recovery and break down heavy compounds and turn them into lighter compounds [10–23]. It is important to note that the various ultrasonic parameters (frequency, power, time, cycle, etc.) must be optimized. An optimal value can achieve the desired result. Ultrasonic waves also have great advantages such as cheapness, convenience, and environmental friendliness. It has also been concluded that sonication operations can decompose heavy colloidal compounds of crude oil and break down asphaltene molecules. Given that the presence of asphaltene in oil reservoirs can be problematic and clog pores and increase viscosity, it is important to know information about ultrasound

parameters because these waves can be very useful in breaking down heavy molecules and reducing viscosity. In addition to the effect of the mentioned parameters on the recovery of crude oil, the type of these waves is also important. This means that intermittent or continuous use of these waves can have different effects on crude oil recovery [61]. Thus, intermittent sonication operations lead to greater crude oil recovery than continuous sonication [61]. In addition to increasing the permeability of ultrasonic waves [62], the vibrations of these waves can also affect the flow of oil and lead to improved water drive recovery and oil structure changes and viscosity decreases [63, 64]. However, the use of another parameter, the ultrasonic cycle, can be effective and should be researched in the future.

## **Conflict of interest**

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

## **Author details**

Ramin Tahmasebi-Boldaji Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

\*Address all correspondence to: ramintahmasbi68@gmail.com

© 2023 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

*The Effect of Ultrasonic Waves on Crude Oil Recovery DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.106494*

### **References**

[1] Alhomadhi E, Amro M,

Almobarky M. Experimental application of ultrasound waves to improved oil recovery during waterflooding. Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences. 2014;**26**(1):103-110

[2] Zhu T, Huang X, Vajjha PK. Downhole harmonic vibration oil-displacement system: a new IOR tool. In: SPE Western Regional Meeting. OnePetro; 2005

[3] Hamidi H, Rafati R, Junin RB, Manan MA. A role of ultrasonic frequency and power on oil mobilization in underground petroleum reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology. 2012;**2**(1):29-36

[4] Hays J, Finkel ML, Depledge M, Law A, Shonkoff SB. Considerations for the development of shale gas in the United Kingdom. Science of the Total Environment. 2015;**512**:36-42

[5] Werner AK, Vink S, Watt K, Jagals P. Environmental health impacts of unconventional natural gas development: A review of the current strength of evidence. Science of the Total Environment. 2015;**505**:1127-1141

[6] Abdulrahman MM, Meribout M. Antenna array design for enhanced oil recovery under oil reservoir constraints with experimental validation. Energy. 2014;**66**:868-880

[7] Mullakaev MS, Abramov VO, Abramova AV. Ultrasonic automated oil well complex and technology for enhancing marginal well productivity and heavy oil recovery. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2017;**159**:1-7

[8] Wang Z, Xu Y, Gu Y. A light lithium niobate transducer design and ultrasonic de-icing research for aircraft wing. Energy. 2015;**87**:173-181

[9] Jia Z. Research on the Technology of Paraffin-Controlling and Viscosity-Reducing for Crude Oil Based on the Utransonic Transducer Array. Harbin Institute of Technology; 2009

[10] Xianyong D, Ping Z. Study on viscosity reduction test in Shengli offshore oil ultrasonic. Oil Gas Storage Transportation. 2004;**23**(3):32-35

[11] Jihu W, Guokun Q, Longtang Z. Study on the effect of ultrasound on the oil viscosity. Journal of Shengli Oilfield Staff University. 2006:1008-8083

[12] Mohsin M, Meribout M. An extended model for ultrasonic-based enhanced oil recovery with experimental validation. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 2015;**23**:413-423

[13] Hamidi H, Mohammadian E, Junin R, Rafati R, Azdarpour A, Junid M, et al. The effect of ultrasonic waves on oil viscosity. Petroleum Science and Technology. 2014;**32**(19):2387-2395

[14] Hamidi H, Mohammadian E, Junin R, Rafati R, Manan M, Azdarpour A, et al. A technique for evaluating the oil/heavyoil viscosity changes under ultrasound in a simulated porous medium. Ultrasonics. 2014;**54**(2):655-662

[15] Wang Z, Xu Y, Bajracharya S. The comparison of removing plug by ultrasonic wave, chemical deplugging agent and ultrasound–chemical combination deplugging for near-well ultrasonic processing technology. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 2015;**27**:339-344

[16] Wang Z, Gu S, Zhou L. Research on the static experiment of super heavy crude oil demulsification and dehydration using ultrasonic wave and audible sound wave at high temperatures. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 2018;**40**:1014-1020

[17] Pu C, Shi D, Zhao S, Xu H. Technology of removing near wellbore inorganic scale damage by high power ultrasonic treatment. Petroleum Exploration and Development. 2011;**38**(2):243-248

[18] Bin L, Jiteng G, Jianguo Z. Sound application of physics in crude oil paraffin control and viscosity reduction of the device. China Petrolium Chemical Industry. 2002;**31**(8):517-520

[19] Hongxing X. Experimental Study on Ultrasonic Treatment for Rremoval of Near Wellbore Damage and Technological Parameters Optimization. East China: College of Petroleum Engineering China University of Petroleum; 2009

[20] Wang Z, Zeng J, Song H, Li F. Research on ultrasonic excitation for the removal of drilling fluid plug, paraffin deposition plug, polymer plug and inorganic scale plug for near-well ultrasonic processing technology. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 2017;**36**:162-167

[21] Kotyusov AN, Nemtsov BE. Induced coagulation of small particles under the action of sound. Acta Acustica United with Acustica. 1996;**82**(3):459-463

[22] Kou J. Research on heavy oil dehydration of ultrasonic. Oil Gas Fields Engineering. 2009;**8**:273-281

[23] Antes FG, Diehl LO, Pereira JS, Guimarães RC, Guarnieri RA, Ferreira BM, et al. Feasibility of low

frequency ultrasound for water removal from crude oil emulsions. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 2015;**25**:70-75

[24] Wang B, Wang C. A kind of environmentally-friendly, anti-wax and antiscaling viscosity reduction device, CN 101328796A. 2008

[25] Wang Z, Fang R, Guo H. Advances in ultrasonic production units for enhanced oil recovery in China. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 2020;**60**:104791

[26] Zhang Z. Electromagnetic ultrasonic anti-scaling device. CN 101376132A. 2009

[27] Abramov VO, Abramova AV, Bayazitov VM, Mullakaev MS, Marnosov AV, Ildiyakov AV. Acoustic and sonochemical methods for altering the viscosity of oil during recovery and pipeline transportation. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 2017;**35**:389-396

[28] Zhou P, Xu Y. Double sonic eddy current anti-wax viscosity reduction device. CN 203769723 U. 2014

[29] Kawamata A, Hosaka H, Morita T. Non-hysteresis and perfect linear piezoelectric performance of a multilayered lithium niobate actuator. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. 2007;**135**(2):782-786

[30] Xu N, Wang W, Han P, Lu X. Effects of ultrasound on oily sludge deoiling. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2009;**171**(1-3):914-917

[31] Bougrier C, Carrère H, Delgenes JP. Solubilisation of wasteactivated sludge by ultrasonic treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2005;**106**(2):163-169

[32] Canoğlu S, Gültekin BC, Yükseloğlu SM. Effect of ultrasonic *The Effect of Ultrasonic Waves on Crude Oil Recovery DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.106494*

energy in washing of medical surgery gowns. Ultrasonics. 2004;**42**(1-9):113-119

[33] Behrend O, Schubert H. Influence of hydrostatic pressure and gas content on continuous ultrasound emulsification. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 2001;**8**(3):271-276

[34] Gao Y, Ding R, Wu S, Wu Y, Zhang Y, Yang M. Influence of ultrasonic waves on the removal of different oil components from oily sludge. Environmental Technology. 2015;**36**(14):1771-1775

[35] Jin Y, Zheng X, Chu X, Chi Y, Yan J, Cen K. Oil recovery from oil sludge through combined ultrasound and thermochemical cleaning treatment. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2012;**51**(27):9213-9217

[36] Ji-Sheng YANG, Hui X. Experimental research on crude oil removal from oily sludge and sands by ultrasound. Acta Petrolei Sinica (Petroleum Processing Section). 2010;**26**(2):300

[37] Taheri-Shakib J, Shekarifard A, Naderi H. The experimental investigation of effect of microwave and ultrasonic waves on the key characteristics of heavy crude oil. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. 2017;**128**:92-101

[38] Harrison ST. Bacterial cell disruption: A key unit operation in the recovery of intracellular products. Biotechnology Advances. 1991;**9**(2):217-240

[39] He S, Tan X, Hu X, Gao Y. Effect of ultrasound on oil recovery from crude oil containing sludge. Environmental Technology. 2019;**40**(11):1401-1407

[40] Breitbach M, Bathen D, Schmidt-Traub H. Effect of ultrasound on adsorption and desorption processes. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2003;**42**(22):5635-5646

[41] Li XB, Liu JT, Xiao YQ, Xiao X. Modification technology for separation of oily sludge. Journal of Central South University. 2011;**18**(2):367-373

[42] Wang Z, Gu S. State-of-the-art on the development of ultrasonic equipment and key problems of ultrasonic oil prudction technique for EOR in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018;**82**:2401-2407

[43] Zhang J. Research on the technology of paraffin-controlling and viscosityreducing for crude oil based on the ultrasonic transducer array. 2009

[44] Pilli S, Bhunia P, Yan S, LeBlanc RJ, Tyagi RD, Surampalli RY. Ultrasonic pretreatment of sludge: A review. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 2011;**18**(1):1-18

[45] Feng D, Aldrich C. Sonochemical treatment of simulated soil contaminated with diesel. Advances in Environmental Research. 2000;**4**(2):103-112

[46] Wang Z, Xu Y, Gu Y. Lithium niobate ultrasonic transducer design for enhanced oil recovery. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 2015;**27**:171-177

[47] Mullakaev MS, Volkova GI, Gradov OM. Effect of ultrasound on the viscosity-temperature properties of crude oils of various compositions. Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering. 2015;**49**(3):287-296

[48] Aliev F, Mukhamatdinov I, Kemalov A. The influences of ultrasound waves on rheological and physicochemical properties of extra heavy oil from "Ashalcha" field. International Multidisciplinary Scientific

GeoConference: SGEM. 2017;**17**(1.4):941-948

[49] Rahimi MA, Ramazani SAA, Alijani Alijanvand H, Ghazanfari MH, Ghanavati M. Effect of ultrasonic irradiation treatment on rheological behaviour of extra heavy crude oil: A solution method for transportation improvement. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2017;**95**(1):83-91

[50] Mousavi SM, Ramazani A, Najafi I, Davachi SM. Effect of ultrasonic irradiation on rheological properties of asphaltenic crude oils. Petroleum Science. 2012;**9**(1):82-88

[51] Tahmasebi Boldaji R, Rajabi Kuyakhi H, Tahmasebi Boldaji N, Rajabzadeh M, Rashidi S, Torki M, et al. A comparative study of mathematical and ANFIS models to determine the effect of ultrasonic waves on the viscosity of crude oil. Petroleum Science and Technology. 2022;**40**(2):150-165

[52] Razavifar M, Qajar J. Experimental investigation of the ultrasonic wave effects on the viscosity and thermal behaviour of an asphaltenic crude oil. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification. 2020;**153**:107964

[53] Tahmasebi-Boldaji R, Hatamipour MS, Khanahmadi M, Sadeh P, Najafipour I. Ultrasoundassisted packed-bed extraction of hypericin from Hypericum perforatum L. and optimization by response surface methodology. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 2019;**57**:89-97

[54] Tahmasebi Boldaji R, Rajabi Kuyakhi H, Tahmasebi Boldaji N. Prediction of 1-butanol and diesel fuel blend heat capacity by response surface methodology. Petroleum Science and Technology. 2020;**38**(11):737-743

[55] Boldaji RT, Kuyakhi HR. Predicting supercritical extraction of St. John's wort by simple quadratic polynomial model and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system-firefly algorithm. Journal of Analytical Techniques and Research. 2021;**3**(2):14-27

[56] Rajabi Kuyakhi H, Boldaji RT, Azadian M. Light hydrocarbons solvents solubility modeling in bitumen using learning approaches. Petroleum Science and Technology. 2021;**39**(4):115-131

[57] Kuyakhi HR, Zarenia O, Boldaji RT. Hybrid intelligence methods for modeling the diffusivity of light hydrocarbons in bitumen. Heliyon. 2020;**6**(9):e04936

[58] Rajabi Kuyakhi H, Tahmasebi Boldaji R. Developing an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system based on particle swarm optimization model for forecasting Cr (VI) removal by NiO nanoparticles. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy. 2021;**40**(4):e13597

[59] Rajabi Kuyakhi H, Tahmasbi Boldaji R. A novel ANFIS model to prediction of the density of n-alkane in different operational condition. Petroleum Science and Technology. 2019;**37**(24):2429-2434

[60] Gao J, Li C, Xu D, Wu P, Lin W, Wang X. The mechanism of ultrasonic irradiation effect on viscosity variations of heavy crude oil. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 2021;**81**:105842

[61] Agi A, Junin R, Chong AS. Intermittent ultrasonic wave to improve oil recovery. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2018;**166**:577-591

[62] Agi A, Junin R, Shirazi R, Afeez G, Yekeen N. Comparative study of ultrasound assisted water and

*The Effect of Ultrasonic Waves on Crude Oil Recovery DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.106494*

surfactant flooding. Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences. 2019;**31**(3):296-303

[63] Mullakaev MS, Abramov VO, Abramova AV. Development of ultrasonic equipment and technology for well stimulation and enhanced oil recovery. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2015;**125**:201-208

[64] Wang Z, Xu Y. Review on application of the recent new high-power ultrasonic transducers in enhanced oil recovery field in China. Energy. 2015;**89**:259-267

### **Chapter 4**
