**Author details**

Bahar Uslu Foundation of Medicine Teaching, Frank H Netter MD School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, North Haven, CT, USA

\*Address all correspondence to: bahar.uslu.md.phd@gmail.com

© 2022 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

*Perspective Chapter: What about Embryo's Rights? DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.106781*

## **References**

[1] Baris M, Uslu B. Can we consider embryos solely as biological material? In: Proceedings of the ICOFMEP International Conference of Future Medical Pioneers. USA, New Haven: Scholars' Press; 2021, 2021. pp. 1-10

[2] Ford NM. The Prenatal Person: Ethics from Conception to Birth. New Jersey, USA: Wiley- Blackwell; 2008. p. 46. ISBN: 978-0-631-23491-3

[3] Habermas J. The Future of Human Nature. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; 2003. p. 44. ISBN 13:9780745629872

[4] Dutch Embryo Act. Section 5.2. 2022. Available from: http://www.bioethics. gr/images/eng-embryowettekst.pdf. [Accessed: April 29, 2022]

[5] Health Council of the Netherlands. 2022. Available from: https://www. healthcouncil.nl/ see note 12: 45. [Accessed: April 6, 2022]

[6] National Consultative Ethics Committee. Opinion on the Preliminary Draft Revision of the Law on Bioethics. Opinion No. 67. Paris: CCNE; 2001

[7] Members of the Belgian National Consultative Bioethics Committee have used the potentiality argument in defence of legalizing embryo research and the generation of research embryos. Belgian National Consultative Bioethics Committee. Advies nr. 18 d.d. 16 september 2002 betreffende het onderzoek met het menselijk embryo *in vitro.* Brussels; 2002

[8] Hursthouse R. (1987) Beginning Lives. Blackwell, Oxford and Cambridge. Infertility Treatment Authority Interim Policy: Tissue Typing in Conjunction with Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. 2002. Available from: http//www.ita.

org.au/forms/policy\_mar2002.pdf. [Accessed: 2022-04-04]

[9] New Belgian Law on Research on Human Embryos: Trust in Progress Through Medical Science. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. Aug 2003;**20**(8):343-346. DOI: 10.1023/A:1024817809784

[10] Cameron C, Williamson R. In the world of Dolly, when does a human embryo acquire respect? Journal of Medical Ethics. 2005;**31**(4):215-220. DOI: 10.1135/jme.2003.006395

[11] Oregon Health and Science University Human skin cells converted into embryonic stem cells: First time human stem cells have been produced via nuclear transfer. [Internet]. 2013. [online] Science Daily, May 15, Available from: http://www.sciencedaily.com/ releases/2013/05/130515125030.htm. [Accessed: May 4, 2022]

[12] Marton I. The human embryo and its right to live: a contribution to the sociology of death. PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM. 2009;**111**(3):373-380. CODEN PDBIAD ISSN 0031-5362

[13] Nachtigall RD, Becker G, Friese C, Butler A, MacDougall K. Parents' conceptualization of their frozen embryos complicates the disposition decision. Fertility and Sterility. 2005;**84**:431-434. DOI: 10.1016/j. fertnstert.2005.01.134

[14] Dolly FS. Mixtures: The Remaking of Genealogy. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press; 2007. p. 68. ISBN 13:9780822339205

[15] de Wert G, Berghmans RLP, Boer GJ, et al. Ethical guidance on human embryonic and fetal tissue transplantation: A European overview. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. 2002;**5**:79-90. DOI: 10.1023/a: 1014213125573

[16] Rager G. Der menschliche Embryo wird als Mittel zum Zweck verbraucht. An Interview. In: Katholische Kirche. Zürich; 2001, 2022

[17] Gerrand N. Creating embryos for research. Journal of Applied Philosophy. 1993;**10**:175-187

[18] Gurmankin AD. Risk information provided to prospective oocyte donors in a preliminary phone call. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2001;**1**:3-13. DOI: 10.1162/152651601317139207

[19] Zoloth L. Jordan's banks, a view from the first years of human embryonic stem cell research. American Journal of Bioethics. 2002;**2**:3-11

[20] Outka G. The ethics of human stem cell research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 2002;**12**:175-213. DOI: 10.1353/ ken.2002.0012

[21] National Institutes of Health. Guidelines for Research Using Human Pluripotent Stem Cells. United States: Department of Health and Human services; 2000. Available from: https:// stemcells.nih.gov/research-policy/ guidelines-for-human-stem-cellresearch. [Accessed: April 6, 2022]

[22] David DG. Creation Ethics. Reproduction, Genetics, and Quality of Life. New York, USA: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 234. DOI: 10.1093/acprof: oso/9780195389630.001.0001

[23] Liao SM. Do mitochondrial replacement techniques affect qualitative or numerical identity? Bioethics. 2017;**31**:20-26. DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12308

[24] Damschen G, Schönecker D. Vorwort. In: Damschen G, Schönecker D (*ed*) Der moralische Status menschlicher Embryonen. Pro und contra Spezies-, Kontinuums, Identitäts und Potentialitätsargument. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin:2003; New York eV-VI

[25] Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Vatican Translation (1987) Instruction on Respect for Human Life in its Origin and on the Dignity of Procreation: Replies to Certain Questions of the Day. Boston: St Paul Editions; 1987

[26] Iglesias T. IVF and Justice. Moral, Social and Legal Issues related to Human in Vitro Fertilization. London: The Linacre Centre for Health Care Ethics; 1990

[27] Simmons A. Do embryos have interests? Why embryos are identical to future persons but not harmed by death. Bioethical Inquiry. 2012;**9**:61. (original emphasis)

[28] Fukuyama F. Our Posthuman Future. New York: Picador; 2002. p. 168. ISBN: 0-374-23643-7

[29] The alpha consensus meeting on the professional status of the clinical embryologist: proceedings of an expert meeting review. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2015;**30**(5):451-461. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.01.016

[30] Kaciroglu F. Turkish ministry of health oral presentation. In: Proceedings of the ICOFMEP International Conference of Future Medical Pioneers. USA, New Haven: Scholars' Press; 2021. pp. 1-10

[31] Kevles DJ. Eugenics and human rights. British Medical Journal. 1999;**319**:435-438. DOI: 10.1136/ bmj.319.7207.435

*Perspective Chapter: What about Embryo's Rights? DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.106781*

[32] Honnefelder L. Die Begründung des moralischen Status des menschlichen Embryos aus der Kontinuität der Entwicklung des ungeborenen zum geborenen Menschen. In: Damschen G, Schönecker D, editors. Der moralische Status menschlicher Embryonen. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. 2003. pp. 62-81. DOI: 10.1515/978311089 9795.61

[33] Honnefelder L. Die Begründung des moralischen Status des menschlichen Embryos aus der Kontinuität der Entwicklung des ungeborenen zum geborenen Menschen. In: Damschen G, Schönecker D, editors. Der moralische Status menschlicher Embryonen. 2003. pp. 62-81. DOI: 10.1515/978311089 9795.61

[34] Shalev C. An ethic of care and responsibility: Reflections on third-party reproduction. Medicine Studies. 2012;**3**:147-156. DOI: 10.1007/ s12376-012-0074

[35] Leist A. Argumente in der Abtreibungsethik. In: Medizin, Mensch, Gesellschaft. Vol. 15. Stuttgart: Enke Verlag; 1990, 1990. p. 127

[36] Society of Histologist and Embryologist. 2022. Available from: http://www.hemud.org/. [Accessed: April 30, 2022]
