Zoonoses Generalities

#### **Chapter 2**

## Zoonosis Aspects to Consider for Its Approach

*Gilberto Bastidas*

#### **Abstract**

This paper constitutes a compendium of introductory aspects to consider the approach to zoonosis useful for health sciences professionals. It was based on a documentary review of scientific literature based on a narrative approach. The information found was grouped into the following chapters: the concept of zoonosis, general aspects of zoonosis, an overview of zoonosis in the world, and theoretical and methodological interventions on zoonosis. Finally, and as a contribution from the researchers, conclusions are provided.

**Keywords:** zoonosis, public health, vertebrate animals, human beings, health programs

#### **1. Introduction**

Zoonosis (due to viruses [45%], bacteria [28%], parasites [20%], and fungi [7%]) cause damage to health because they represent 70% of the infectious pathologies that affect human beings and with a significant compromise of animal health (of 1 415 pathogenic agents for humans, 868 zoonosis have been described, and 80% of the latter are capable of affecting different species of animals), which implies a considerable economic burden for the countries, fundamentally derived from their health system [1–3].

In addition, the underreporting of zoonosis in many countries, especially those with low incomes, is notable, among other things, to deficiencies in health promotion and education, poor health coverage, limited hospital and laboratory infrastructure, poor inter-institutional interaction and, especially the application of deficient sanitary control programs [4, 5].

These diseases are often underestimated as a public health problem despite their significant impact on morbidity and mortality (43.6% are distributed throughout the world, of which 63.3% appear in Africa) compared to other pathologies that affect humans and animals [3, 6–9].

Mainly due to the lack of knowledge of the real magnitude of the problem (good records are not kept), the noncompliance in the application of the control programs that already exist in each country, and because of the key concepts that constitute the theoretical framework of zoonoses as an area of knowledge They are scattered in various bibliographic sources, which makes access difficult [3, 6–9].

The objective of the present written is to make a compilation of information on the last point, that is, a concentration and updating of relevant aspects that exist in the

world literature on the subject based on a narrative approach. Since solid knowledge is that health professionals can achieve significant achievements in the prevention, control, and eradication of zoonosis [3, 6–9].

### **2. Methodology**

The present work was based on the documentary review of scientific literature in electronic and physical format on aspects of zoonosis based on the systematic analysis and narrative description of what was found, for which virtual databases were used (Bireme/PAHO, Medline, PudMed, and Scielo) from descriptors related to the topic. Repeated documents and those without clear conclusions and without originality were excluded. All original articles published up to December 2021 were included. The relevant ideas were grouped into four aspects that can be read independently, in order to facilitate their review:


Finally, and as a contribution from the researchers, conclusions are provided.

#### **2.1 The concept of zoonosis**

This word derives from the Greek roots zoos (animal) gnosis (disease). Its origin is attributed to Rudolf Virchowe, since in the nineteenth century he used this word to refer to diseases shared between man and animals. In 1956 (in the twentieth century) the World Health Organization defined zoonosis as any disease that is naturally transmitted from vertebrate animals to man in a man-centered concept, therefore, three years later this international organism of health reformulates the concept of diseases that are transmitted between animals and man [10, 11].

This last definition of zoonosis is followed by the proposal by Schwalbe, which from the operational-administrative perspective gives it the following meaning: "... those infections and infestations that in nature are shared by man and other lower vertebrate animals" [10–12]. Subsequently, the concepts zoo anthropozoonosis (when the infection is transmitted from animals to humans) and anthropozoonosis (when the infection is transmitted from humans to animals) appear [11, 12].

According to the characteristics of their transmission cycle, zoonosis is classified into (**Table 1**):

In addition, the transmission of a zoonosis between animals and humans can be:

• Direct due to systematic or circumstantial coexistence (they group together a large part of the best-known zoonoses);


#### **Table 1.**

*Types of zoonosis according to their transmission cycle.*


#### **2.2 General aspects of zoonosis**

Due to their form of transmission, zoonosis is divided into:


They can also be


A disease can be placed in more than one category. In addition, these infections can be:


Emerging and re-emerging zoonosis are considered neglected diseases because their prevalence is particularly high in marginalized populations with low incomes without access to health services and where official health institutions neglect to attend to their health needs. In addition, among the conditioning factors of the emergence and re-emergence of zoonosis, demography, ecological and climatic changes, and human behavior are mentioned [16, 17].

#### **2.3 Overview of zoonosis in the world**

The key element to describe the epidemiological behavior of zoonosis is the information registry. However, its quality (complete and up-to-date) can be seriously compromised in countries with low economic income, due to poor investment of financial resources and technical difficulties, as well as the frequent political and social conflicts that occur in many of these countries, because private health institutions do not keep records or do so partially or incompletely, and because of the subclinical behavior of some zoonosis that prevents their registration on time [6, 18, 19].

In countries with low economic income, economic support, and the availability of human talent and favorable political will toward the health sector are constantly changing, which has a negative influence on the control and eradication of zoonosis, since they mark periodic cycles of advances and setbacks in the fight with these diseases. Likewise, the scarce or absent intersectoral coordination and the non-perception of zoonosis as an important public health problem by health authorities contribute to the stagnation in the control of these diseases. The need for care and the institutional response to zoonosis control allow it to be grouped into three categories as shown in **Table 2** [6, 20]:

The control and eradication of zoonosis are seriously compromised by a series of factors that ensure their spread, among which are mentioned:



#### **Table 2.**

*Zoonosis according to its importance, is a health problem.*


In addition, the control of zoonosis is affected:


In Latin America and the Caribbean, for example, there are 26 priority zoonotic diseases (**Table 3**).

In the world, there are several zoonosis, considered emerging and priority among them are H5N1 and H1N1 influenza, SARS, and most recently Ebola and Zika [28]. Likewise, the stages through which zoonosis goes through to become pandemics are currently described (see **Table 4**).

Strategies to try to predict potential pandemics are also described (**Table 5**).

#### **2.4 Theoretical and methodological interventions for zoonosis**

Zoonosis is approached, studied, and intervened by classical or conventional epidemiology through the positivist paradigm that is based on the risk approach in the search for explanations about the health-disease process and about the circumstances that imply damage to human health and animal, due to the economic losses generated by the high figures of morbidity and mortality attributed to zoonotic transmission diseases, which undoubtedly hinder the development of countries [10, 30].

The advances and contributions achieved with the methods and theories of classical epidemiology are great and important, however, for the management of zoonoses, an integral vision is required that allows understanding of the complexity of the relationship between animals and human beings due to ecosystem and intervening social variables since it is necessary to go beyond the mere identification of infectious


*Source: Drawn from Maxwell [28].*

#### **Table 3.**

*Zoonosis is considered priorities for health authorities in Latin America and the Caribbean.*

*Pre-emergence (Stage 1):* The infectious agent is in its natural reservoir, but the alteration of the transmission dynamics due to environmental, ecological, social, and economic alterations allows:

Expansion within the host population.

The spread to a new region.

It is transmitted to another non-host population.

That reaches the human being.

Large-scale agricultural or demographic changes, such as transport of livestock, to the region where the infectious agent has a niche or movement of wildlife to other regions in search of food, result in multidirectional transmission. For example, transmission like this can be between livestock and non-human primates and that can increase the probability that the pathogen reaches humans and spreads among different populations. Advance to the second stage??.

*Localized emergency (Stage 2):* The causative agent spreads from wildlife or livestock to people due to the slaughter of wild animals and from exposure to fomites in markets, on farms, or in the wild. It can affect small human groups orstepthen

become large outbreaks. They can be limited (for example, Ebola virus) or not (for example, Hendra virus) *Full pandemic emergency (Stage 3):* Transmission is already sustained from person to person and spread is on a large scale driven by global air travel (HIV/AIDS and severe acute respiratory syndrome, among others) and travel for reservoir and vector trade (West Nile virus). This stage depends on a long chain of transmission, so that it can occur, for this reason, pandemics in stage three are considered rare.

*Source: Modified from Stephen [29].*

#### **Table 4.**

*Stages in disease emergence.*

Determining the relationship between the species of the pathogenic agent and the host. This is particularly important because the species closely related to each other favor the transmission of the etiological agent, that is, it passes easily from one host to another, however, in living beings human emerging pathogen species can come from closely related or distant hosts. The key to transmission to occur is contact.

The emergence of pathogens can be predicted based on the analysis of phylogenetic relationships. In this sense, it is known that wild pathogens that are more closely related to those that affect humans are more certain to infect people in contrast to those distant. Likewise, the analysis of the phylogenetic relationship allows for determining the pathogenesis.

The potential of emerging pathogens across a wide range of hosts (plasticity), thus, emerging pathogens have the ability to successfully transmit between different host taxa, thus increasing the probability of transmission to humans. Hence, the need for a constant study of these mechanisms in order to establish predictions.

The presence of factors that facilitate the passage of a pathogen between different host species (evolutionary capacity), although these aspects are little known, they are related to the ability to mutate. The understanding of these mechanisms facilitates the explanation of the high capacity for jumping between hosts that some species of pathogens have.

High transmission efficiency is often related to the ability of the pathogen to employ new transmission routes, hence, massive or generalized epidemic outbreaks are correlated with high transmission efficiency.

The prediction of ligand-receptor binding requires an understanding of the interactions involved between common elements (already existing) or new ones because the binding at the cellular level between the pathogen and the host cell is the initial and indispensable step (binding to the receptor is necessary but not sufficient condition to ensure infection since other factors are required) and it is usually associated with changes in the tropism of the host's tissues. Despite the fact that there are many technological and scientific advances, only the cellular receptor of a little less than half of the pathogens that affect human beings is known. Highly speciesspecific receptors are considered as a barrier to infection between pathogens and unusual or new hosts.

The prediction of the transmissibility (virulence) of pathogens to humans is the greatest challenge to face in the study of pandemics since pathogen species that behave benignly in their natural hosts can trigger severe or lethal inflammatory responses in the host. New host coevolution patterns.

*Source: Modified from Stephen [29].*

#### **Table 5.**

*Prediction of pandemic potential.*

agents, pathogenesis, transmission, control, and treatment, in this sense, the paradigms of complexity and chaos have been used for the study of zoonosis [30–34].

The single and multi-causality approaches to risk are not enough to understand and explain the complex interactions that occur in zoonosis, paradigms are required that go beyond system theories, structural functionalism, the inability to control the pathogenic agent, the articulation of the epidemiological discourse to health policies, the ecosystem approach and the social component (behavior and culture in the relationship between equals, social determinants, and inequities in health), in this sense, a holistic approach to zoonoses (prevents the fragmentation and decontextualization of the health problem by considering it broad and complex) [30, 35–41].

Hence, international health organizations issue general and comprehensive recommendations that contribute to adequate surveillance and response capacity in the event of the emergency and re-emergence of zoonosis (see **Table 6**).

These recommendations seek to prevent, monitor, and control zoonosis to reduce its impact on health, but to achieve this, the joint participation of animal health, human health, and the environmental sector are required.

#### **Recommendations**


*Source: Ministry of Health [42].*

#### **Table 6.**

*Recommendations for comprehensive surveillance and adequate response to zoonosis.*

#### **3. Conclusions**

This writing constitutes a brief but concise compendium on zoonosis that starts from the meaning of the word, goes through its general aspects, through the epidemiological panorama, and finally through the theoretical and methodological interventions that it has been the object of, it can then serve as a tool for health professionals and for the community in general in acquiring knowledge about zoonosis or for updating them in the fight against these diseases because with the information it offers, the dynamics of the factors that condition or determine their emergence can be understood, re-emergence, prevalence, and distribution in the animal and human population.

However, in the field of health control of zoonosis and from what is stated in this paper, it is concluded that the approach to zoonosis requires cross-cutting, multidisciplinary, and inter-institutional health care, in addition to the incorporation of social, cultural, and economic concepts that define the animal-man relationship, as well as the consideration of the circumstances that imply the involuntary contact between both actors (often ignored) as a result of mutual coexistence and the incorporation in the epidemiological surveillance of diseases of this type that have a low frequency of appearance.

*Zoonosis Aspects to Consider for Its Approach DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.106503*

#### **Author details**

Gilberto Bastidas Department of Public Health, Institute of Medical and Biotechnological Research of the University of Carabobo, Venezuela

\*Address all correspondence to: bastidasprotozoo@hotmail.com

© 2022 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### **References**

[1] Yamada A. Zoonoses. Uirusu. 2004;**54**(1):17-22. DOI: 10.2222/jsv.54.17

[2] Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). Zoonosis and Neglected Diseases: Interventions and Research. http://www.paho.org/panaftosa/index. php?option=com\_content&view=article &id=137&Itemid=371

[3] Fuentes M, Pérez L, Suárez Y, Soca M, Martinez A. Zoonosis as science and its social impact. Electronic Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2006;**7**(9):1-19

[4] Bastidas G. Malaria by *Plasmodium vivax* and deficiency of glucose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase: The Venezuela Case. Annals of Malaria Research. 2018;**1**(1):1001

[5] Cross A, Baldwin V, Roy S, Essex-Lopresti A, Prior L, Harmer N. Zoonosis under our noses. Microbes and Infection. 2019;**21**(1):10-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.micinf.2018.06.001

[6] Matamoros J, Sanín L, Santillana M. Zoonoses and their social determinants: a perspective to consider in Public Health. Journal of Public Health. 2000;**2**(1):17-35

[7] Bastidas G. Epidemiological characteristics of Leishmaniasis. Annals of Infectious Disease and Epidemiology. 2018;**3**(2):1030

[8] Bastidas G, Malave C, Bastidas D. Parasitism in science fiction movies and its use as a tool for control. Scientific Information Magazine. 2019;**98**(6):721-733

[9] Moutou F. Zoonosis infectieuses: risques liés à la faune sauvage [Infectious zoonosis: Risks linked to wildlife]. The Revue du Praticien. 2019;**69**(3):333-335

[10] Schwalbe C. Veterinary Medicine and Public Health. Mexico: Editorial Novaro; 1969

[11] Martínez-Conde J. Guide of the Head Veterinary Inspector. 2-Epizootiology and Zoonosis. Barcelona: Aedos Veterinary Library; 1975

[12] Concise Veterinary Dictionary. Great Inglaterra: Britain. Oxford University Press; 1988

[13] Acha N, Szyfres B. Zoonoses and Communicable Diseases Common to Man and Animals. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization; 1986

[14] Bastidas G, Bastidas D. Some parasites that affect the skin in the human being: Epidemiological aspects. Journal of Dermatology & Cosmetology. 2018;**2**(6):84-85

[15] Dabanch J. Zoonosis. Chilean Journal of Infectology. 2003;**20** (Suppl. 1):S47-S51. DOI: 10.4067/ S0716-10182003020100008

[16] Maurera D, Bastidas G. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients with tuberculosis in Carabobo state, Venezuela. Medical Journal of Uruguay. 2019;**35**(2):105-112

[17] Maurera D, Liccioni E, Bastidas G. Tuberculosis and experiences: A look from phenomenology. Journal of Nursing and Humanities. 2019;**23**(55):67-77

[18] Eastwood K, Massey P, Mor S, Bosward K. Publisher: Unraveling zoonotic diseases in Australia. Australian Journal of General Practice. 2018;**47**(3):85

[19] Bastidas G, Bastidas D, Bastidas-Delgado G. The control of *Zoonosis Aspects to Consider for Its Approach DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.106503*

tropical diseases is the health goal to achieve. Science Journal of Public Health. 2019;**7**(5):163-166

[20] Bastidas G, Malave C, Bastidas D. *Blastocystis* sp update on its parasitic role. Bolivian Medical Gazette. 2019;**42**(2):182-188

[21] Steele J. Veterinary public health: Past success, new opportunities. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2008;**86**(3-4):224-243

[22] Flores R. The current situation of the most frequent zoonoses in the world. Medical Gazette of Mexico. 2010;**146**:423-429 https:// www.anmm.org.mx/GMM/2010/ n6/64\_vol\_146\_n6.pdf

[23] Báez F. Zoonosis: A public health problem. Clinical and Social Medicine. 2019;**3**(3):104-105

[24] Brucker M. Novel viruses, zoonotic infections, and travel health. Nursing for Women's Health. 2020;**24**(2):65-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.nwh.2020.02.002

[25] Sánchez A, Prats-van der Ham M, Tatay-Dualde J, García-Galán A, de la Fe C, Corrales J, et al. Zoonosis and occupational health in the veterinary profession. Spanish Magazine of Public Health. 2018;**3**:92

[26] Huertas P, León E, Tarabla H. Zoonosis and veterinary waste disposal in rural practice. Argentine Journal of Microbiology. 2019;**51**(3):251-254. DOI: 10.1016/j.ram.2018.08.004

[27] Macedo Couto R, Ranzani O, Waldman E. Zoonotic Tuberculosis in Humans: Control, Surveillance, and the One Health Approach. Epidemiologic Reviews. 2019;**41**(1):130-144. DOI: 10.1093/epirev/mxz002

[28] Maxwell M, de Freire Carvalho M, Hoet A, Vigilato M, Pompei J, Cosivi O, et al. Building the road to a regional zoonoses strategy: A survey of zoonoses programmes in the Americas. PLoS One. 2017;**12**(3):e0174175

[29] Stephen S, Mazet JAK, Woolhouse M, Parrish CR, Carroll D, Karesh WB, et al. Prediction and prevention of the next pandemic zoonosis. Lancet. 2012;**380**:1955-1196

[30] Acero-Aguilar M. Zoonoses and other public health problems related to animals: Reflections on their theoretical and methodological approaches. Journal of Health Management and Policies. 2016;**15**(31):232-245

[31] Arch-Tirado E, Javier R-MJ. Sciences of complexity and chaos as tools in the analysis of the proliferation of vectors and zoonosis. Surgery and Surgeons. 2009;**77**:341-350

[32] Abdel K, Hernández D, Hidalgo O, Hidalgo S, Hung F, Lorenzo C, et al. Clinical-epidemiological characteristics and knowledge about American tegumentary leishmaniasis in a population of Carabobo, Venezuela. Peruvian Journal of Health Research. 2020;**4**(1):09-16

[33] Reina J. SARS-CoV-2, a new pandemic zoonosis that threatens the world. Vaccine. 2020;**21**(1):17-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.vacun.2020.03.001

[34] Royce K, Fu F. Mathematically modeling spillovers of an emerging infectious zoonosis with an intermediate host. PLoS One. 2020;**15**(8):e0237780. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237780

[35] Rosenberg F. Social structure and veterinary epidemiology in Latin America. Bol centro Panamericano Fiebre Aftosa. 1986;**53**:3-23

[36] Quevedo E. The Health-disease Process: Towards a Non-positivist Clinic

#### *Zoonosis of Public Health Interest*

and Epidemiology. Bogotá: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana; 1990

[37] Bastidas G. Contributions of epidemiology to the control of leishmaniasis. Journal of Public Health of Colombia. 2019;**21**(4):1

[38] Bastidas G, Medina T, Bastidas D. Parasitic Diseases in Emergency and Reemergence Environments. Spanish: Spanish Academic Publisher; 2018

[39] Saadi A, Antoine-Moussiaux N, Marcotty T, Thys S, Sahibi H. Using qualitative approaches to explore the challenges of integrated programs for zoonosis control in developing countries: Example of hydatidosis control in Morocco. Zoonosis Public Health. 2021;**68**(5):393-401. DOI: 10.1111/ zph.12814

[40] Talbot B, Kulkarni M, Colautti R. Convergence research for emerging zoonosis. Trends in Parasitology. 2021;**37**(6):465-467. DOI: 10.1016/j. pt.2021.03.008

[41] Institute of Medicine. Sustaining Global Surveillance and Response to Emerging Zoonotic: Microbial recommendations the United States. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press; 2009

[42] Ministerio de salud y protección social (Minsalud). Estrategia de gestión integral de zoonosis-EGI-zoonosis. 2017. https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/ Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/VS/PP/ET/ egi-zoonosis-documento-ultimo.pdf

Section 3
