**6.2 The transcendental argument about the silences and superficialities of quality reporting**

Both the silences about scholarship of engagement and the crisis cases as the events and processes at the domain of the actual already opened the window of inference about the nature of reality at the domain of the real. Thinking of such a domain and causal efficaciousness points to some compelling evidence about the crisis events of the academic project at WSU, dating back to 2018, 2011, and even 2009. The fair conclusion is that the SER has been completed based on a privileged information as the dominant explanations about quality, whose sources are the systems of domination and control about the idea of university education as a public good. A consideration of the crisis events, against Focus Area 3 about quality systems, surfaces the

*Reimagining Corporate Social Responsibility in the Idea of University Education as the Public… DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.110177*

challenges of the institutional culture along the four variables and what could be the practical alternative mechanisms in avoiding the crisis:


Points a) to d) above constitute what could and should have been the role of the three directorates (**Figure 1**), at the least, in developing the culture of integrated quality management systems, for a university whose slogan is "A Pursuit for Excellence." The acid test, however, would be to implement such "pursuit" strategies by means of an "infusion model" when the systems and processes are designed and led as part of academic leadership function as praxis artistry, that is, the level where there must be the unity of theory and practice in practice! As evidenced by the discussion in this article, the mainstream quality management practices, which can masquerade as responsibilities, were not relevant and responsive enough, especially in the Crisis events I, II, and III. To address the inadequacies thereof, the practitioners at WSU would have to embrace the notion of beyondness, that is, the ability to understand and explain the structural generative mechanisms at the point of emergent powers and properties, which abductive and retroductive reasoning can allow for.
