**6. Conclusion**

To conclude, the psychoanalytic crisis brings a reflection on the role of the analyst in a contemporary world, which can lose in some moments the historical dimension of the knowledge by theory in the function of a social narrative acceptance and a globalized politics to not live the anxieties in the countertransference relation, which leads to an acting-out position of the analyst in the analytic setting and outside it.

From that, there are two groups, those who want to take action represented by this analytical approach and those who demand reflection, searching for analytical work to help the patient to cope with the psychic burden.

Nowadays, the analyst's anxieties about being part of social media might interfere in the investigative and inquisitive work, in order to attend to social demands. It can be argued that the analyst's narcissism in a world where we are connected and judged all the time, the view is focused on the outside, in trying to reach the ideal Ego. There is no way to please everybody, and this means tolerating the narcissistic wound without the fantasy that one will fall in the anguish of annihilation.

It is necessary to be attentive to the fact that the fear of prejudice does not obscure the psychic suffering that is behind the corporal issues. Consequently, this work has not the intent to question the existence of a diagnosis or a pathology, but rather to reflect on the analyst place and counterbalance the procedures that are being imposed as parameters and are referenced as "gold standard" with protocols that many times withdraw the subjective identity in favor of a rule of how this individuality must act in the world. Therefore, we think that analysts have a role in questioning the medicalization of identity, in order to assist the subject in its broad spectrum, to be precise, in its full identity.
