**Figure 10.**

*Algorithm required memory size (bytes).*

#### **Figure 11.**

*Algorithm encryption/decryption time (ms).*

The above experiment result tells us that the proposed ECC algorithm is much more efficient than the existing RSA algorithm in Speed, memory size, and security [15, 16].

The analysis of encryption/decryption execution time for both the proposed design and the existing system has been discussed in the below report, experimented with the sensitive banking data, and file transfer in the cloud environment is measured in regards to file size and execution time (mile second). Results tell us that the

*Secured Storage Mechanism for the Cloud-Based Banking Applications Using ECC DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.107931*

#### **Figure 12.** *Performance measure for ECC and RSA.*

#### **Figure 13.**

*Memory size analysis for the bank data on the cloud.*

proposed design is better than the existing system, specifically bank data handle in the cloud environment.

**Figure 13** discusses the memory size of the sensitive data transfer on the cloud environment, memory size, and the execution time of the encryption/decryption that is measured for the particular document. In execution, the proposed ECC is much better than the existing RSA; **Figure 14** discusses the experimental results clearly showing that the proposed security model can encode the data with very low processing time and a lesser amount of memory size in the cloud system.

#### **Figure 14.**

*Execution analysis for the bank data on the cloud.*
