**6.1 Problematisation**

Problematisation defines the problem or opportunity with which an actor proposes a solution. The proposed solution acts as the obligatory passage point [20]. In the context of Sudan land registration, the process of land registration, or the procedures for extracting the testimonies, or the stages of selling the land, all involve many repeated steps for scrutiny, review, verification and confirmation within each party and in the interaction between the parties with each other. Despite all that, there are losses, fraud, forgery and other manipulation cases that lead to conflicts. Therefore, the top management of the authority would seek to introduce BT to guarantee transparency, immutability, persistency and auditability through decentralisation peer-to-peer and information sharing. Therefore, the challenges of corruption would be dealt with, accelerating the process, reducing fraud cases, bringing transparency with smart contracts, eliminate forgery and allow openness of the land registration data. According to the above, the top management would be responsible for pulling other actors to adopt this solution.

*Perspective Chapter: Actor-Network Theory as an Organising Structure for Blockchain Adoption… DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.106751*

### *6.1.1 Obligatory passage point*

The obligatory passage point (OPP) can be initiated by facilitating communications with the stakeholders. Each stakeholder would have to pass through the OPP to gain their desired interests. However, in passing through the OPP, they may have to experience some changes and need to adjust their situations to suit the new network [15]. For example, the Sudanese land registration would need to initiate the BT development as OPP to imply the concepts of decentralisation and information sharing that support the process of BT adoption. Therefore, a radical change of the key organisational processes in the organisation would be necessary [67].
