Section 1 Introduction

## **Chapter 1**

## Introductory Chapter: Global Cotton Research Development Trends for the Past Five Years – Key Directions

*Ibrokhim Y. Abdurakhmonov*

## **1. Introduction**

Cotton, represented by more than 50 *Gossypium* species, is the world's most important natural textile fiber crop. The cottonseed is an important source of feed, foodstuff, and oil. Because of the importance of this cash crop worldwide, it is very important to timely review the current state of advancement in cotton research for determining the development trends. For this purpose, I previously compiled two book volumes in the InTechOpen open-access publication platform on cotton research in 2014 and 2016 [1, 2]. Later, in 2018, Mehboob-Ur-Rahman and Zafar [3], and in 2020, Ansari [4] had compiled two other dedicated book volumes on the advancement of cotton research. All of these volumes highlighted the latest advancement in cotton investigations and covered periodical success in cotton science and farming. However, in recent years, we have witnessed that cotton research progressively has advanced over a decade to address the key challenges and limitations of cotton farming worldwide. Researchers have initiated largely coordinated multi-institutional research projects on cotton. These efforts have greatly accelerated cotton research globally to improve cotton production and farming [5].

## **2. Novel focuses**

In recent years, cotton researchers have focused on cotton genetics/genomics and physiology, cotton germplasm collections and its biodiversity, traditional and molecular breeding for cultivar development, tagging important genes, whole-genome sequencing, genome-wide marker-trait association, transcriptome and proteome analyses useful for new-generation superior biotechnology crops, transgenic and new-generation gene-editing technologies, including CRISPR/Cas9. Cotton crop physiology in a complex view from seed germination to maturation stages under different temperatures, water, light, and nutrient applications [5] has been the key propriety and under the targeted focus of the world research community.

Efforts on novel and emerging innovations and game-changing technologies are ongoing to address current cotton farming limitations and for the effective management of sustainable cotton agriculture. These include but are not limited to virtual

breeding, bioinformatics, smart communication and mobile phone technologies, artificial intelligence, and augmented reality-based applications helping cotton breeding and farming in the era of climate change and technological advances [5].

Eminent cotton scientists of the world have reported that "cotton farming and management practices, the utilization of new generation of chemical and biological fertilizers and their assessment tools, including modern conservation tillage, winter cover cropping, site-specific nutrient applications, and remote sensing technologies, as well as integrated pest and disease management programs" [2, 5] and cotton seed science development, will be the key research directions toward 2030.

## **3. Past 5-year development trends**

Cotton-research-related publications over more than one century (1908–2022), retrieved from the *PubMed* database [6] using the keyword search of "*Gossypium*," revealed over 9060 scientific publications as of March 2022 (**Figure 1**). We observed a publication increase in early 1966 that had doubled in number compared with earlier years. The next twofold increase was observed around 1973–1975, and publication activity remained in the same range of about 100 publications per year until 2000, after which a sharp 1.6-fold increase (167 publications) was observed in 2001. The next bumps were in 2007 (227 publications/year), 2013 (385 publications/year), and 2016 (420 publications/year), remaining at the plateau till today.

The literature analysis and research publication on the *Gossypium* science for the past 5 years clearly showed the advancement trends of cotton research worldwide for the current time. The number of publications per year for the past 5-year period was at the plateau and was within the range of 420 publications/year, and overall, we found over 2009 available articles in *PubMed*, retrieved using the "*Gossypium*" keyword, out of which 1948 were directly related to the cotton study. Interestingly, analysis based on PubMed indexed journals showed that, over the past 5 years, at least, 283 internationally known peer-reviewed plant science journals including but are not limited to Front Plant Sci (125 publications), PLoS One (103 publications), Sci Rep (103 publications), BMC Plant Biol (92 publications), Int J Mol Sci (81 publications), and BMC Genomics

*Introductory Chapter: Global Cotton Research Development Trends for the Past Five Years – Key… DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.105748*

(72 publications) have published cotton articles. Among all *PubMed-i*ndexed publications, the majority of works (1872 publications) were research articles, while 55 articles were literature review works. The remaining 21 articles were Brief Communications (3 publications), Database (3 publications), Protocols (3 publications), Reports (3 publications), Research highlights (2 publications), Scientific opinions (2 publications) as well as Disease notes, Methods, News & Views, Brief Reports, and Short communications (1 publication of each).

These publications have also used or investigated a diverse type of cotton species including but are not limited to *G. hirsutum* (796 publications), *Gossypium barbadense* (219 publications), *G. arboreum* (226 publications), G. *raimondii* (191 publications), *Gossypium herbaceum* (17 publications), *G. davidsonii* (7 publications), *G. longicalyx* (5 publications), and *Glossoloma anomalum* (1 publication). The main AD-genome allotetraploid (*G. hirsutum* and *G. barbadense*) and A- and D-genome diploid (*G. herbaceum*, *G. arboretum,* and *G. raimondii*) cotton species were the subjects to study a diverse set of traits and/or plant ontogenesis or resistance-related processes, while some of the diploid species including *G. davidsonii, G. longicalyx, and G. anomalum* have been mainly used to study the specific traits such as cytoplasmic male sterility, pant development, salt stress tolerance, nematode resistance, and fiber development.

In this context, in-depth analysis and review of the past 5-year publications have revealed the main directions of cotton research that the world research community or leading researchers have focused on lately (**Figure 2**). In particular, researchers have more focused on studying biotic stresses [e.g., 7–10], plant development [e.g., 11–13], abiotic stresses [e.g., 14, 15], fiber development [e.g., 16, 17], and genomics [e.g., 18–21] compared with other directions. Studies on cotton agronomy [22, 23], genetics and breeding [24, 25], evolution [26, 27], yield improvement [28, 29], processing of cotton product [30, 31], biochemical components [32, 33], and mutagenesis [34, 35] were also carried out.

The past 5-year published literature analysis demonstrated that cotton plant protection, in particular, resistance to biotic pressure (670 publications) and abiotic

**Figure 2.** *Research directions of the past 5-year scientific publications.*

stresses (323 publications) have been the two major research trends of cotton research for the past 5-year period. Researchers have also focused on plant development (355 publications), fiber development (282 publications), and genome (203 publications) studies. Each main direction, in turn, has addressed the diverse research problems in cotton based on national or global level issues. Here, interestingly, we observed the leading number of biotic stress-related publications with more focus on insect resistance (171 publications) or pest control (166 publications), following the *Verticillium* wilt disease (152 publications) topics. Similarly, publications on abiotic stress-related topics have mainly addressed salinity tolerance, drought tolerance, cold tolerance, heat and drought tolerance, soil mineral deficiency, and its impact on many other traits and crop productivity. Salt (94 publications) and drought (72 publications) or their combinations (43 publications) were the main targets of researchers. These directions could also be the result of the need for cotton farming for the improvement of cotton cultivar development under harsh environmental conditions and/or increased disease/pest pressure over the past years. Moreover, these key research directions are most likely to be in our current and future cotton research program agenda under the rapidly growing challenges and limitations of the global climate change scenario worldwide.

This *Cotton* book volume has compiled scientific chapters from the international research community that covers the current status and latest advances in cotton science. Chapters have presented a wide range of novel discussions on cotton genetics, biochemistry and physiology of important trait(s), bioinformatics and genomics resources to understand the cotton plant, genomics and transcriptomic approaches to the identification and characterization of important genes, novel transgenic tools for acceleration of cotton breeding against climate issues and biotic/abiotic stress pressures, biological control and machinery tools for cotton cultivar protection, and cottonseed meal production as well as sustainable and effective farming in the era of climate change and technological advance. These peer-reviewed chapters have also presented novel views and discussions on the abovementioned research trends observed in the past 5-year publications, which will be an excellent addendum for readers.

## **4. Conclusion**

Thus, this Cotton book chapters from international cotton research communities have timely provided an overview of the current state of advancement in cotton research. I am confident that these peer-reviewed chapter discussions should help to determine the current and future development trends in cotton science, cultivar development, and sustainable cotton agriculture in the world.

## **Acknowledgements**

I thank Dr. Mirzakamol S. Ayubov and his lab members for their help with the published literature analysis.

*Introductory Chapter: Global Cotton Research Development Trends for the Past Five Years – Key… DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.105748*

## **Author details**

Ibrokhim Y. Abdurakhmonov Center of Genomics and Bioinformatics, Academy of Sciences of Uzbekistan, Republic of Uzbekistan

\*Address all correspondence to: i.y.abdurakhmonov@gmail.com

© 2022 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

## **References**

[1] Abdurakhmonov IY. World Cotton Germplasm Resources. London: IntechOpen; 2014. p. 322. DOI: 10.5772/ 56978

[2] Abdurakhmonov IY. Cotton Research. London: IntechOpen; 2016. p. 310. DOI: 10.5772/61914

[3] Mehboob-Ur-Rahman M, Zafar Y. Past, Present and Future Trends in Cotton Breeding. London: IntechOpen; 2018. p. 184. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen. 69672

[4] Ansari M. Advances in Cotton Research. London: IntechOpen; 2020. p. 84. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.77828

[5] Cotton vision 2030. ICAC. Recorder. 2020;**38**(4):18-20 ISSN 1022-6303

[6] PubMed Database [Internet]. 2022. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/. [Accessed: January 3, 2022].

[7] Cox KL, Meng F, Wilkins KE, Li F, Wang P, Booher NJ, et al. TAL effectordriven induction of a SWEET gene confers susceptibility to bacterial blight of cotton. Nature Communications. 2017;**8**:15588. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms 15588

[8] Zubair M, Zaidi SS, Shakir S, Farooq M, Amin I, Scheffler JA, et al. Multiple begomoviruses found associated with cotton leaf curl disease in Pakistan in early 1990 are back in cultivated cotton. Scientific Reports. 2017;**7**(1):680. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-00727-2

[9] Liu XD, Xu TT, Lei HX. Refuges and host shift pathways of host-specialized aphids *Aphis gossypii*. Scientific Reports. 2017;**7**(1):2008. DOI: 10.1038/ s41598-017-02248-4

[10] Wang G, Xu J, Li L, Guo Z, Si Q, Zhu G, et al. GbCYP86A1-1 from *Gossypium barbadense* positively regulates defense against *Verticillium dahliae* by cell wall modification and activation of immune pathways. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2020;**18**(1):222-238. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.13190

[11] McGarry RC, Ayre BG. Cotton architecture: Examining the roles of *SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS* and *SELF-PRUNING* in regulating growth habits of a woody perennial crop. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2021;**59**:101968. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2020.10.001

[12] Zhi X, Han Y, Li Y, Wang G, Feng L, Yang B, et al. Root growth and spatial distribution characteristics for seedlings raised in substrate and transplanted cotton. PLoS One. 2017;**12**(12):e0190032. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190032

[13] Ayubov MS, Mirzakhmedov MH, Sripathi VR, Buriev ZT, Ubaydullaeva KA, Usmonov DE, et al. Role of MicroRNAs and small RNAs in regulation of developmental processes and agronomic traits in *Gossypium* species. Genomics. 2019;**111**(5):1018-1025. DOI: 10.1016/j. ygeno.2018.07.012

[14] Mahmood T, Khalid S, Abdullah M, Ahmed Z, Shah MKN, Ghafoor A, et al. Insights into drought stress signaling in plants and the molecular genetic basis of cotton drought tolerance. Cell. 2019;**9**(1):105. DOI: 10.3390/cells 9010105

[15] Wei Y, Xu Y, Lu P, Wang X, Li Z, Cai X, et al. Salt stress responsiveness of a wild cotton species (*Gossypium klotzschianum*) based on transcriptomic analysis. PLoS One. 2017;**12**(5):e0178313. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178313

*Introductory Chapter: Global Cotton Research Development Trends for the Past Five Years – Key… DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.105748*

[16] Hernandez-Gomez MC, Runavot JL, Meulewaeter F, Knox JP. Developmental features of cotton fibre middle lamellae in relation to cell adhesion and cell detachment in cultivars with distinct fibre qualities. BMC Plant Biology. 2017;**17**(1):69. DOI: 10.1186/ s12870-017-1017-3

[17] Martínez-Sanz M, Pettolino F, Flanagan B, Gidley MJ, Gilbert EP. Structure of cellulose microfibrils in mature cotton fibres. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2017;**175**:450-463. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.07.090

[18] Gao W, Long L, Tian X, Xu F, Liu J, Singh PK, et al. Genome editing in cotton with the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017;**8**:1364. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01364

[19] Wang M, Tu L, Yuan D, Zhu D, Shen C, Li J, et al. Reference genome sequences of two cultivated allotetraploid cottons, *Gossypium hirsutum* and *Gossypium barbadense*. Nature Genetics. 2019;**51**(2):224-229. DOI: 10.1038/ s41588-018-0282-x

[20] Grover CE, Arick MA, Conover JL, Thrash A, Hu G, Sanders WS, et al. Comparative genomics of an unusual biogeographic disjunction in the cotton tribe (*Gossypieae*) yields insights into genome downsizing. Genome Biology and Evolution. 2017;**9**(12):3328-3344. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evx248

[21] Zaidi SS, Mansoor S, Paterson A. The rise of cotton genomics. Trends in Plant Science. 2018;**23**(11):953-955. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.08.009

[22] Song X, Li Y, Yue X, Hussain Q, Zhang J, Liu Q, et al. Effect of cotton straw-derived materials on native soil organic carbon. Science in the Total Environment. 2019;**663**:38-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.311

[23] Bansal S, Yin X, Schneider L, Sykes V, Jagadamma S, Lee J. Carbon footprint and net carbon gain of major long-term cropping systems under no-tillage. Journal of Environmental Management. 2022;**307**:114505. DOI: 10.1016/j. jenvman.2022.114505

[24] Wang L, Wang X, Maimaitiaili B, Kafle A, Khan KS, Feng G. Breeding practice improves the mycorrhizal responsiveness of cotton (*Gossypium* spp. L.). Frontiers in Plant Science. 2021;**12**:780454. DOI: 10.3389/ fpls.2021.780454

[25] Billings GT, Jones MA, Rustgi S, Hulse-Kemp AM, Campbell BT. Population structure and genetic diversity of the PEE DEE cotton breeding program. G3 (Bethesda). 2021;**11**(7):jkab145. DOI: 10.1093/ g3journal/jkab145

[26] Bao Y, Hu G, Grover CE, Conover J, Yuan D, Wendel JF. Unraveling cis and trans-regulatory evolution during cotton domestication. Nature Communications. 2019;**10**(1):5399. DOI: 10.1038/s41467- 019-13386-w

[27] Zhang TT, Liu H, Gao QY, Yang T, Liu JN, Ma XF, et al. Gene transfer and nucleotide sequence evolution by *Gossypium* cytoplasmic genomes indicate novel evolutionary characteristics. Plant Cell Reports. 2020;**39**(6):765-777. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-020-02529-9

[28] Li C, Zhao T, Yu H, Li C, Deng X, Dong Y, et al. Genetic basis of heterosis for yield and yield components explored by QTL mapping across four genetic populations in upland cotton. BMC Genomics. 2018;**19**(1):910. DOI: 10.1186/ s12864-018-5289-2

[29] Ma L, Wang Y, Ijaz B, Hua J. Cumulative and different genetic effects contributed to yield heterosis using

maternal and paternal backcross populations in upland cotton. Scientific Reports. 2019;**9**(1):3984. DOI: 10.1038/ s41598-019-40611-9

[30] Wang C, Zhang S, Wu S, Cao Z, Zhang Y, Li H, et al. Effect of oxidation processing on the preparation of posthydrothermolysis acid from cotton stalk. Bioresource Technology. 2018;**263**:289- 296. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.05.008

[31] Xu SS, Qiu SW, Yuan ZY, Ren TZ, Bandosz TJ. Nitrogen-containing activated carbon of improved electrochemical performance derived from cotton stalks using indirect chemical activation. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2019;**540**:285-294. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.01.031

[32] Resco de Dios V, Anderegg WRL, Li X, Tissue DT, Bahn M, Landais D, et al. Circadian regulation does not optimize stomatal behaviour. Plants (Basel). 2020;**9**(9):1091. DOI: 10.3390/ plants9091091

[33] Xu J, Chen L, Sun H, Wusiman N, Sun W, Li B, et al. Crosstalk between cytokinin and ethylene signaling pathways regulates leaf abscission in cotton in response to chemical defoliants. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2019;**70**(5):1525- 1538. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erz036

[34] Chen X, Lu X, Shu N, Wang S, Wang J, Wang D, et al. Targeted mutagenesis in cotton (*Gossypium hirsutum* L.) using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Scientific Reports. 2017;**7**:44304. DOI: 10.1038/srep44304

[35] Abid MA, Wang P, Zhu T, Liang C, Meng Z, Malik W, et al. Construction of *Gossypium barbadense* mutant library provides genetic resources for cotton germplasm improvement. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;**21**(18):6505. DOI: 10.3390/ ijms21186505

Section 2
