Introductory Chapter: Macrophages – More than Sentinel Innate Immune Cells

*Vijay Kumar*

#### **1. Introduction**

Elia or Ilya Metchnikoff first described macrophages as phagocytes (eating cells) in 1882 in starfish larvae inserted with the tangerine tree thorns and later (1883–1884) in *Daphnia magna* or common water flea infected with fungal/yeast spores due to its transparent outer carapace [1–4]. Metchnikoff considered macrophages/phagocytes as homeostatic agents of the body, which continuously vigil on foreign invaders and maintain the host's internal environment (homeostasis) and tissue/organ remodeling [5]. However, the term phagocytosis or phagocytes (Greek derivative for devouring cells) was not introduced by Elia Metchnikoff, instead given by Carl or Karl Claus (a German Zoology professor, who invited Elia Metchnikoff to publish his findings in his journal in 1883) [6, 7]. Elia Metchnikoff won the Noble prize (Physiology and Medicine) for this discovery with Paul Ehrlich in 1908. Thus, macrophages were first discovered as phagocytes or devouring cells that engulf any foreign material (size ≥0.5 μm) entering the host almost 140 years ago [8, 9]. These comprise first innate immune cells responding in response to the invasion of the host by foreign particles (pathogens, allergens, and xenobiotics). Hence, macrophages are considered one of the sentinel innate immune cells of the immune system. They play a crucial role in immune homeostasis maintenance, host defense, inflammation, and different inflammatory and infectious diseases through different mechanisms (phagocytosis, secretion of different inflammatory mediators, and interacting directly with different immune (innate and adaptive) and non-immune cells) [10–14]. Hence, macrophages are potent innate immune cells with diverse immunological functions. This chapter discusses emerging non-immunological functions of macrophages.

#### **2. Macrophages in the human reproduction and reproductive cycle**

Macrophages are present in the male (testes) and female reproductive organs/tract (ovaries, fallopian tubes, uterus, and vagina) and serve as crucial accessory cells for reproduction (**Figure 1**) [15–17]. In the embryonic life of a male fetus, the yolk-sac macrophages regulate testes morphogenesis and vascularization [18]. Further studies have shown that the macrophage-specific genes/transcription factors Mafb and Maf are crucial mediators of morphogenesis and vascularization of testes during the embryonic development [19, 20]. The process involves distortion of the myeloid cell

#### **Figure 1.**

*Macrophages are crucial for different physiological process (sperm production, ovulation, fertilization, placentation, embryonic development, regeneration, neurogenesis, learning and memory) other than playing crucial role in immune function. Details are mentioned in the text.*

ratios (profound increase in gonadal macrophages in the absence of Mafb) as Mafb regulates macrophages' differentiation. The Maf loss causes testicular hypervascularization, defective testis cord formation, deficiency of Leydig cells, and decreased

#### *Introductory Chapter: Macrophages – More than Sentinel Innate Immune Cells DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.109647*

germ cell number [19]. Mafb also regulates the cholesterol efflux in macrophages and can control the Leydig cell function by regulating the 2—hydroxycholesterol (25-HC) secretion [21]. However, Mafb or macrophages are not crucial for the maintenance of spermatogenesis in the adult mice [22, 23]. Notably, the resident macrophages of adult testes are the derivatives of embryonic precursors of macrophages (fetal macrophages) under normal conditions, and bone marrow-derived macrophages do not infiltrate testes [23]. On the other hand, in postnatal mice, testicular macrophages are crucial for steroidogenesis (sex hormone synthesis) by controlling Leydig cell proliferation and differentiation in the prepubertal stage [24–29]. For example, depletion of interstitial macrophages in testes inhibits Leydig cell development, and pro-inflammatory activation of macrophages also inhibits steroidogenesis by Leydig cells by producing a lipophilic factor that controls steroidogenesis or testosterone production.

The testicular macrophages secrete 25-HC, converted to testosterone by the neighboring Leydig cells [30]. However, the overproduction of 25-HC by testicular macrophages during infection or other inflammatory conditions impacting the testes inhibits the steroidogenic function of Leydig cells. The macrophage and Leydig cell interaction details are mentioned elsewhere [31]. The macrophage ubiquitin-specific protease 2 (USP2) contributes to the sperm motility, hyperactivation, capacitation, and fertilization capacity of the murine sperm, and myeloid-selective USP2 knockout (msUSP2KO) mice sperm has a decreased mitochondrial membrane potential for ovum fertilization [32]. The treatment of sperms derived from msUSP2KO mice with granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) rescued their potential for fertilizing the ovum. Thus, testicular macrophages regulate steroidogenesis, spermatogenesis (maintenance of spermatogonial niche in adult testes), sperm motility, capacitation, and *in vitro* fertilization of mouse sperm that are crucial for sexual reproduction in mammals, including humans (**Figure 1**) [33–35]. Hence, testicular macrophages (peritubular macrophages) are close to peritubular myoid cells in seminiferous tubules where spermatogenesis takes place, and interstitial macrophages are located within the testicular interstitium in close contact with Leydig cells crucial for male reproductive function.

Macrophages are abundant in the mesenchymal and connective tissue stroma of the gravid and non-gravid uterus, comprising the necessary amount of villous or labyrinthine mesenchymal cells of human and mouse placenta (**Figure 1**) [36, 37]. The large (10–30 μm) human placental macrophages present in the fetal villi of the placenta (from the first trimester until birth) are called Hofbauer cells and maintain placental and fetal development and homeostasis (**Figure 1**) [38]. Thus, placental macrophages are composed of two different populations: (1) decidual macrophages and (2) Hofbauer cells [39]. Detailed ontogeny and function of placental macrophages have been discussed elsewhere [40, 41]. Recently identified, three different subsets of macrophages (CCR2<sup>−</sup> CD11clow, CCR2− CD11chi, and CCR2+ CD11chi) express CD45 and CD14 differently in the human uterus during early pregnancy maintain maternal-fetal homeostasis [42, 43]. In the absence of pregnancy, these uterine or endometrial macrophages play a crucial role in menstruation and the maintenance of tissue integrity to prepare the uterus for reproductive events, including fertilization and implantation (**Figure 1**) [44]. However, the macrophage number varies (1–15%) in the endometrium depending on the stage of the menstrual cycle [45]. The number of macrophages also increases in the uterus and cervix preceding the parturition, indicating their involvement in childbirth through releasing several biological mediators [46]. A recent human study has indicated that women with recurrent pregnancy

loss have alternatively activated CD45<sup>+</sup> CD14+ ICAM3− macrophages expressing low levels of CD209 and CD206 expression and have high expression of TNF-α in their proinflammatory CD45+ CD14+ CD80+ HLA-DR+ macrophages in their uterus at the maternal-fetal interface [47]. Hence, any imbalance in the uterine/decidual macrophages in human females and in experimental mammals prevents pregnancy/blastocyst implantation and induces recurrent pregnancy loss [48, 49].

In addition to the uterus and placenta, macrophages are also present in the ovary and regulate the ovarian cycle (ovulation, corpus luteum formation, and luteolysis) through different processes, including the phagocytosis of the apoptotic cells and the release of different mediators (**Figure 1**) [50, 51]. The details are beyond the scope of this introductory chapter and have been discussed elsewhere [50, 51]. The macrophage-derived multinucleated giant cells increase in the ovaries of aged mice indicating ovarian aging and a decline in its reproductive potential or ovum production and release [52]. Of note, in aged male mice, the testicular macrophages show lipofuscin granule accumulation and altered morphology that are absent in testicular macrophages of young adult mice [53]. The lipofuscin granule accumulation in the testicular macrophages of aged mice occurs due to altered metabolism but not due to its phagocytosis.

Further studies are required to indicate the role of testicular macrophages in the event of andropause. However, the expression of transient receptor potential vanilloid 2 (TRPV2, a cation channel) increased in CD206**+**MHC II**+** testicular macrophages of aged mice due to inflammaging in the testes microenvironment may play a crucial role in andropause [54]. The TRPV2 expression affects the phagocytic potential of macrophages by controlling cytosolic Ca2+ levels and their motility [55–57]. In addition, aging impacts Leydig cell functions, including steroidogenesis (testosterone synthesis), and testicular interstitial macrophages are crucial in affecting these cells [58]. Hence, macrophages are crucial for sexual reproduction and developmental process.

#### **3. Macrophages in organ and tissue regeneration**

Abraham Trembley, a naturalist in the eighteen century, gave the idea of regeneration and wanted to know about the process responsible for regressing the heads of hydra and earthworms [59]. Hence, the regeneration process involves regressing the lost tissue or organ in animals when they lose it. However, some animals (planarians (a class of flatworms considered masters of regeneration and can rebuild any body part once it is lost or cut) and cnidarians) are considered immortal under the edge of a knife [60–62]. Amphibians, including salamanders and axolotls, also regenerate their body parts [63]. In reptiles, regeneration is proper for lizards, geckos, and iguanas as they regenerate their lost tails, but it is not valid for snakes and crocodiles [64]. Birds can regenerate their lost mechanoreceptive sensory (auditory) hair cells in the inner ear responsible for hearing that is absent in mammals [65, 66]. Hence, the loss of auditory hair cells in humans leads to permanent deafness. In humans, liver and cardiac muscle cells have the power of regeneration only. Hence, the loss of auditory hair cells in humans leads to permanent deafness. In humans, liver and cardiac muscle cells only have the power of regeneration. The biology of regeneration is beyond the scope of this chapter.

Macrophages also play a crucial role in the process of tissue or organ regeneration (**Figure 1**). For example, macrophages have been shown to play a crucial role in

#### *Introductory Chapter: Macrophages – More than Sentinel Innate Immune Cells DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.109647*

the regeneration process in Salamanders (**Figure 1**) [67]. In these organisms, their recruitment at the site of limb amputation peaks around 6 days after the amputation in response to the profound release of macrophage chemoattractants [68]. Even heart regeneration in salamanders requires macrophage infiltration, which is essential for fibroblast activation and the extracellular landscape without affecting cardiomyocyte proliferation [69]. Macrophage depletion prevents heart regeneration and induces fibroblast activation, and alters collagenase deposition and arrangement process that may lead to fibrosis, a condition that may lead to organ malfunction and mortality [69, 70]. The details of macrophage function in tissue and organ (skin, heart, and liver) regeneration in mammals, including humans, have been described elsewhere [71–75].

#### **4. Microglia or brain macrophages in neurogenesis, learning, and memory**

Microglia are resident brain macrophages of the central nervous system (CNS), which solely originate from the embryonic yolk sac erythromyeloid precursors under normal conditions, which also give rise to macrophages in other tissues and organs [76, 77]. Of note, adult hematopoietic progenitors do not significantly contribute to the maintenance of microglia in the adult brain. In addition to their primary function as local innate immune cells of the brain and the maintenance of brain homeostasis, microglia also play a crucial role in neurogenesis, learning, and memory [78–80]. Recent studies have suggested the role of microglia in brain development or neurogenesis (**Figure 1**), and their dysregulation induces different neurodevelopmental diseases and other neurological diseases later in life [81–83]. The activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B or AKT (PI3K-AKT) signaling pathway in microglia is crucial for inducing neurogenic protein expression in primary cortical cells [84]. For example, microglia in the CNS control synaptic pruning, which is crucial to promote synapse formation and the regulation of neuronal and synaptic plasticity *via* different signals involving complement proteins and CX3CR1 signaling [85, 86]. The microglia-based regulation of synaptic pruning, plasticity, and neuronal activity is beyond the current chapter's scope and has been discussed in detail elsewhere [87].

Deleting the circadian clock gene Bmal1, specifically in mice's microglia (the circadian clock regulates their function), increases their learning potential and memory in mice fed a high-fat diet [88]. On the other hand, the microglia-specific brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) depletion promotes working memory and stimulates neural precursor proliferation following traumatic brain injury (TBI) [89]. However, under normal conditions, BDNF depletion, specifically from microglia, impairs memory and reduces motor-learning-dependent synapse formation [90]. Thus, microglia's memory and synaptic plasticity function vary with the brain's homeostatic alteration. Further studies have shown that the repopulation of microglia in the rat brain after their depletion significantly improves their learning and memory performance [91]. Of note, microglia depletion does not impact short-term memory in rats acutely.

The microglia also regulate learning and memory through IL-33 (expressed in adult hippocampal neurons and also secreted by astrocytes) as they express IL-33 receptor (IL-33R) along with controlling spine plasticity, synapse homeostasis during CNS development, newborn neuron integration, and remote fear memories [92, 93]. The IL-33 binding to the microglial IL-33R induces uptake of extracellular matrix (ECM), and its loss causes over-accumulation of ECM in contact with synapses

that affect synaptic plasticity and memory. Microglia inhibition in rodents with neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other neuroinflammatory conditions with minocycline (a centrally penetrant tetracycline antibiotic), affects long-term potentiation (LTP), synaptic plasticity, neurogenesis, and hippocampal-dependent spatial memory [94–97]. However, the treatment with minocycline impairs human spatial and temporal memory by disrupting striatal processing [98]. Hence, modulating the microglial function in humans is not a straightforward approach and is a two-edge sword to restoring memory and learning associated with different neurodegenerative diseases. The details of microglia in neurogenesis, learning, and memory are mentioned elsewhere [87, 99–101].

#### **5. Macrophages regulating systemic metabolism**

Metabolism plays a crucial role in the organism's well-being and homeostasis. The disruption in the metabolic pathways through different factors (including intake of high-calorie or high-fat diet, lack of exercise, insulin tolerance, and different genetic factors) in individuals predispose them to type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM or T2DM), obesity, hypertension, and atherosclerosis. However, the potential proinflammatory action of macrophages in the pathogenesis of metabolic syndrome (obesity, insulin resistance, T2DM, atherosclerosis) has been well studied and established due to their direct involvement in the pathogenesis of inflammation and inflammatory diseases [102–105]. This section is not intended to describe the immunological function of macrophages in metabolism but to discuss their nonimmune role in regulating systemic metabolism.

The anti-inflammatory drugs show a modest effect on metabolism, as shown by many clinical trials that indicate the limited impact of inflammation on the metabolism [106, 107]. However, the depletion of liver macrophages (LMs) or Kupffer cells in obese mice affects their metabolism and improves fatty liver, indicating their role in insulin sensitivity [108–110]. Notably, the pro-inflammatory phenotype of LMs does not play a significant role in obesity and insulin resistance in flies, mice, and humans [111]. Instead, LMs produce non-inflammatory insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (IGFBP7) that directly controls liver metabolism. The IGFBP7 released from LMs binds to the insulin receptor, which induces lipogenesis and gluconeogenesis by activating extracellular-signal-related kinase (ERK) signaling [111]. Hence, LMs contribute to systemic metabolism and associated diseases independent of their immune functions. Thus, the discovery of other non-immune factors in other macrophages, including adipose-tissue macrophages (ATMs) in obese people controlling systemic metabolism, may serve as a better therapeutic approach where their inflammatory role is secondary in the pathogenesis. Further studies are required in this direction.

#### **6. Conclusion**

Macrophages are first discovered as phagocytic innate immune cells. After 140 years of their discovery, they are ruling the world of immunology as a potent innate immune cell in almost every organ. They are present in even organs considered previously devoid of immune cells (brain, testes, and retina). Along with potent innate immune cells, which protect the host from foreign invasion, they also control the adaptive immune response by serving as potent antigen-presenting cells (APC). In addition,

#### *Introductory Chapter: Macrophages – More than Sentinel Innate Immune Cells DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.109647*

they also serve as potent immune cells, which control different non-immune functions (reproduction and embryonic development, regeneration, neurogenesis, and neurological functions, including learning and memory and systemic metabolism) that I have described in this chapter. Thus, macrophages are not only the body's guards against pathogens but also maintain homeostasis through different mechanisms *via* controlling different biological functions varying from reproduction to regeneration and from metabolism to learning and memory. Thus, after 140 years of their discovery, macrophages sit over the top in immunology and biology.

### **Author details**

Vijay Kumar1,2

1 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC), Memphis, TN, USA

2 Department of Interdisciplinary Oncology, Stanley S. Scott Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Science Center (LSUHSC), New Orleans, LA, USA

\*Address all correspondence to: vkuma2@lsuhsc.edu; vij\_tox@yahoo.com

© 2023 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

### **References**

[1] Hirsch JG. Phagocytosis. Annual Review of Microbiology. 1965;**19**:339-350

[2] Gordon S. Elie Metchnikoff: Father of natural immunity. European Journal of Immunology. 2008;**38**:3257-3264

[3] Metchnikoff E. The Overtime of Life: Optimistic Studies. London, United Kingdom: Edition William Heinemann; 1907

[4] Brown GD. How fungi have shaped our understanding of mammalian immunology. Cell Host & Microbe. 2010;**7**:9-11

[5] Teti G, Biondo C, Beninati C. The phagocyte, Metchnikoff, and the foundation of immunology. Microbiology Spectrum. 2016;**4**

[6] Cavaillon JM. The historical milestones in the understanding of leukocyte biology initiated by Elie Metchnikoff. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2011;**90**:413-424

[7] Tauber AI. Metchnikoff and the phagocytosis theory. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2003;**4**:897-901

[8] Flannagan RS, Jaumouille V, Grinstein S. The cell biology of phagocytosis. Annual Review of Pathology. 2012;**7**:61-98

[9] Kumar V. Phagocytosis: Phenotypically simple yet a mechanistically complex process. International Reviews of Immunology. 2020;**39**:118-150

[10] Bhat A, Wooten RM, Jayasuriya AC. Secretion of growth factors from macrophages when cultured with microparticles. Journal of Biomedical

Materials Research. Part A. 2013;**101**: 3170-3180

[11] Shimokado K, Raines EW, Madtes DK, Barrett TB, Benditt EP, Ross R. A significant part of macrophage-derived growth factor consists of at least two forms of PDGF. Cell. 1985;**43**:277-286

[12] Nathan CF. Secretory products of macrophages. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1987;**79**:319-326

[13] Franken L, Schiwon M, Kurts C. Macrophages: Sentinels and regulators of the immune system. Cellular Microbiology. 2016;**18**:475-487

[14] Kumar V. Chapter 1: Macrophages: The potent immunoregulatory innate immune cells. In: Khalid Hussain B, editor. Macrophage Activation. London, UK, Rijeka: IntechOpen; 2019

[15] Cohen PE, Nishimura K, Zhu L, Pollard JW. Macrophages: Important accessory cells for reproductive function. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 1999;**66**:765-772

[16] Nguyen PV, Kafka JK, Ferreira VH, Roth K, Kaushic C. Innate and adaptive immune responses in male and female reproductive tracts in homeostasis and following HIV infection. Cellular & Molecular Immunology. 2014;**11**:410-427

[17] Monin L, Whettlock EM, Male V. Immune responses in the human female reproductive tract. Immunology. 2020;**160**:106-115

[18] DeFalco T, Bhattacharya I, Williams AV, Sams DM, Capel B. Yolk-sac-derived macrophages regulate fetal testis vascularization *Introductory Chapter: Macrophages – More than Sentinel Innate Immune Cells DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.109647*

and morphogenesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2014;**111**:E2384-E2393

[19] Li SY, Gu X, Heinrich A, Hurley EG, Capel B, DeFalco T. Loss of Mafb and Maf distorts myeloid cell ratios and disrupts fetal mouse testis vascularization and organogenesis. Biology of Reproduction. 2021;**105**:958-975

[20] Hamada M, Tsunakawa Y, Jeon H, Yadav MK, Takahashi S. Role of MafB in macrophages. Experimental Animals. 2020;**69**:1-10

[21] Kim H. The transcription factor MafB promotes anti-inflammatory M2 polarization and cholesterol efflux in macrophages. Scientific Reports. 2017;**7**:7591

[22] Shawki HH, Oishi H, Usui T, Kitadate Y, Basha WA, Abdellatif AM, et al. MAFB is dispensable for the fetal testis morphogenesis and the maintenance of spermatogenesis in adult mice. PLoS One. 2018;**13**:e0190800

[23] Lokka E, Lintukorpi L, Cisneros-Montalvo S, Mäkelä J-A, Tyystjärvi S, Ojasalo V, et al. Generation, localization and functions of macrophages during the development of testis. Nature Communications. 2020;**11**:4375

[24] Bhushan S, Meinhardt A. The macrophages in testis function. Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2017;**119**:107-112

[25] Hales DB. Testicular macrophage modulation of Leydig cell steroidogenesis. Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2002;**57**:3-18

[26] Mossadegh-Keller N, Sieweke MH. Testicular macrophages: Guardians

of fertility. Cellular Immunology. 2018;**330**:120-125

[27] Gaytan F, Bellido C, Aguilar E, van Rooijen N. Requirement for testicular macrophages in Leydig cell proliferation and differentiation during prepubertal development in rats. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 1994;**102**:393-399

[28] Nes WD, Lukyanenko YO, Jia ZH, Quideau S, Howald WN, Pratum TK, et al. Identification of the lipophilic factor produced by macrophages that stimulates steroidogenesis. Endocrinology. 2000;**141**:953-958

[29] Hutson JC, Garner CW, Doris PA. Purification and characterization of a lipophilic factor from testicular macrophages that stimulates testosterone production by Leydig cells. Journal of Andrology. 1996;**17**:502-508

[30] Lukyanenko YO, Chen JJ, Hutson JC. Production of 25-hydroxycholesterol by testicular macrophages and its effects on Leydig cells. Biology of Reproduction. 2001;**64**:790-796

[31] Hutson JC. Physiologic interactions between macrophages and Leydig cells. Experimental Biology and Medicine. 2006;**231**:1-7

[32] Hashimoto M, Kimura S, Kanno C, Yanagawa Y, Watanabe T, Okabe J, et al. Macrophage ubiquitin-specific protease 2 contributes to motility, hyperactivation, capacitation, and in vitro fertilization activity of mouse sperm. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences: CMLS. 2021;**78**:2929-2948

[33] DeFalco T, Potter SJ, Williams AV, Waller B, Kan MJ, Capel B. Macrophages contribute to the spermatogonial niche in the adult testis. Cell Reports. 2015;**12**:1107-1119

[34] Meistrich ML, Shetty G. The new director of "the spermatogonial niche": Introducing the peritubular macrophage. Cell Reports. 2015;**12**:1069-1070

[35] de Oliveira SA, Cerri PS, Sasso-Cerri E. Impaired macrophages and failure of steroidogenesis and spermatogenesis in rat testes with cytokines deficiency induced by diacerein. Histochemistry and Cell Biology. 2021;**156**:561-581

[36] Hunt JS, Pollard JW. Macrophages in the uterus and placenta. In: Russell SW, Gordon S, editors. Macrophage Biology and Activation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1992. pp. 39-63

[37] Chambers M, Rees A, Cronin JG, Nair M, Jones N, Thornton CA. Macrophage plasticity in reproduction and environmental influences on their function. Frontiers in Immunology. 2021;**11**

[38] Zulu MZ, Martinez FO, Gordon S, Gray CM. The elusive role of placental macrophages: The Hofbauer cell. Journal of Innate Immunity. 2019;**11**:447-456

[39] Mezouar S, Katsogiannou M, Ben Amara A, Bretelle F, Mege J-L. Placental macrophages: Origin, heterogeneity, function and role in pregnancyassociated infections. Placenta. 2021;**103**:94-103

[40] Thomas JR, Naidu P, Appios A, McGovern N. The ontogeny and function of placental macrophages. Frontiers in Immunology. 2021;**12**:771054

[41] Reyes L, Golos TG. Hofbauer cells: Their role in healthy and complicated pregnancy. Frontiers in Immunology. 2018;**9**

[42] Jiang X, Du M-R, Li M, Wang H. Three macrophage subsets are identified in the uterus during early human pregnancy. Cellular & Molecular Immunology. 2018;**15**:1027-1037

[43] Jiang X, Wang H. Macrophage subsets at the maternal-fetal interface. Cellular & Molecular Immunology. 2020;**17**:889-891

[44] Thiruchelvam U, Dransfield I, Saunders PTK, Critchley HOD. The importance of the macrophage within the human endometrium. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2013;**93**:217-225

[45] Salamonsen LA, Zhang J, Brasted M. Leukocyte networks and human endometrial remodelling. Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2002;**57**:95-108

[46] Mackler AM, Iezza G, Akin MR, McMillan P, Yellon SM. Macrophage trafficking in the uterus and cervix precedes parturition in the mouse. Biology of Reproduction. 1999;**61**:879-883

[47] Gomez-Lopez N, Garcia-Flores V, Chin PY, Groome HM, Bijland MT, Diener KR, et al. Macrophages exert homeostatic actions in pregnancy to protect against preterm birth and fetal inflammatory injury. JCI Insight. 2021;**6**:e146089

[48] Robertson SA, Jasper MJ, Bromfield JJ, Care AS, Nakamura H, Ingman WV. The role of macrophages in implantation and early pregnancy success. Biology of Reproduction. 2008;**78**:274-275

[49] Sun F, Wang S, Du M. Functional regulation of decidual macrophages during pregnancy. Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2021;**143**:103264

[50] Wu R, Van der Hoek KH, Ryan NK, Norman RJ, Robker RL. Macrophage

*Introductory Chapter: Macrophages – More than Sentinel Innate Immune Cells DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.109647*

contributions to ovarian function. Human Reproduction Update. 2004;**10**:119-133

[51] Pepe G, Locati M, Della Torre S, Mornata F, Cignarella A, Maggi A, et al. The estrogen–macrophage interplay in the homeostasis of the female reproductive tract. Human Reproduction Update. 2018;**24**:652-672

[52] Foley KG, Pritchard MT, Duncan FE. Macrophage-derived multinucleated giant cells: Hallmarks of the aging ovary. Reproduction. 2021;**161**:V5-V9

[53] Giannessi F, Giambelluca MA, Scavuzzo MC, Ruffoli R. Ultrastructure of testicular macrophages in aging mice. Journal of Morphology. 2005;**263**:39-46

[54] Eubler K, Rantakari P, Gerke H, Herrmann C, Missel A, Schmid N, et al. Exploring the ion channel TRPV2 and testicular macrophages in mouse testis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;**22**

[55] Link TM, Park U, Vonakis BM, Raben DM, Soloski MJ, Caterina MJ. TRPV2 has a pivotal role in macrophage particle binding and phagocytosis. Nature Immunology. 2010;**11**:232-239

[56] Koyasu S. Vanilloid flavor for a good appetite? Nature Immunology. 2010;**11**:187-189

[57] Lévêque M, Penna A, Le Trionnaire S, Belleguic C, Desrues B, Brinchault G, et al. Phagocytosis depends on TRPV2 mediated calcium influx and requires TRPV2 in lipids rafts: Alteration in macrophages from patients with cystic fibrosis. Scientific Reports. 2018;**8**:4310

[58] Wang Y, Chen F, Ye L, Zirkin B, Chen H. Steroidogenesis in Leydig cells: Effects of aging and

environmental factors. Reproduction. 2017;**154**:R111-R122

[59] MacCord K, Maienschein J. Understanding regeneration at different scales. eLife. 2019;**8**:e46569

[60] Dalyell JG. Observations on some Interesting Phenomena in Animal Physiology, Exhibited by Several Species of Planariae. Edinburgh: Dyer Press; 2007

[61] Holstein TW, Hobmayer E, Technau U. Cnidarians: An evolutionarily conserved model system for regeneration? Developmental Dynamics. 2003;**226**:257-267

[62] Reddien PW. The cellular and molecular basis for planarian regeneration. Cell. 2018;**175**: 327-345

[63] Joven A, Elewa A, Simon A. Model systems for regeneration: Salamanders. Development (Cambridge, England). 2019;**146**:dev167700

[64] Alibardi L. Regeneration in reptiles and its position among vertebrates. In: Alibardi L, editor. Morphological and Cellular Aspects of Tail and Limb Regeneration in Lizards: A Model System with Implications for Tissue Regeneration in Mammals. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2010. pp. 1-49

[65] Stone JS, Rubel EW. Cellular studies of auditory hair cell regeneration in birds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2000;**97**:11714-11721

[66] Menendez L, Trecek T, Gopalakrishnan S, Tao L, Markowitz AL, Yu HV, et al. Generation of inner ear hair cells by direct lineage conversion of primary somatic cells. eLife. 2020;**9**:e55249

[67] Bolaños-Castro LA, Walters HE, García Vázquez RO, Yun MH. Immunity in salamander regeneration: Where are we standing and where are we headed? Developmental Dynamics. 2021;**250**:753-767

[68] Godwin JW, Pinto AR, Rosenthal NA. Macrophages are required for adult salamander limb regeneration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013;**110**:9415-9420

[69] Godwin JW, Debuque R, Salimova E, Rosenthal NA. Heart regeneration in the salamander relies on macrophagemediated control of fibroblast activation and the extracellular landscape. npj Regenerative Medicine. 2017;**2**:22

[70] Distler JHW, Györfi A-H, Ramanujam M, Whitfield ML, Königshoff M, Lafyatis R. Shared and distinct mechanisms of fibrosis. Nature Reviews Rheumatology. 2019;**15**:705-730

[71] Kumar V. Macrophages: The potent immunoregulatory innate immune cells. In: Macrophage Activation - Biology and Disease. 2019

[72] Wynn TA, Vannella KM. Macrophages in tissue repair, regeneration, and fibrosis. Immunity. 2016;**44**:450-462

[73] Leor J, Palevski D, Amit U, Konfino T. Macrophages and regeneration: Lessons from the heart. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. 2016;**58**:26-33

[74] Ding J, Lei L, Liu S, Zhang Y, Yu Z, Su Y, et al. Macrophages are necessary for skin regeneration during tissue expansion. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2019;**17**:36

[75] Gao Y, Qian N, Xu J, Wang Y. The roles of macrophages in heart regeneration and repair after injury. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2021;**8**

[76] Ginhoux F, Guilliams M. Tissueresident macrophage ontogeny and homeostasis. Immunity. 2016;**44**:439-449

[77] Ginhoux F, Greter M, Leboeuf M, Nandi S, See P, Gokhan S, et al. Fate mapping analysis reveals that adult microglia derive from primitive macrophages. Science. 2010;**330**:841-845

[78] Li Q, Barres BA. Microglia and macrophages in brain homeostasis and disease. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2018;**18**:225-242

[79] Prinz M, Priller J. Microglia and brain macrophages in the molecular age: From origin to neuropsychiatric disease. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2014;**15**:300-312

[80] Salter MW, Stevens B. Microglia emerge as central players in brain disease. Nature Medicine. 2017;**23**:1018-1027

[81] Reemst K, Noctor SC, Lucassen PJ, Hol EM. The indispensable roles of microglia and astrocytes during brain development. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2016;**10**:566

[82] Derecki NC, Katzmarski N, Kipnis J, Meyer-Luehmann M. Microglia as a critical player in both developmental and late-life CNS pathologies. Acta Neuropathologica. 2014;**128**:333-345

[83] Sato K. Effects of microglia on neurogenesis. Glia. 2015;**63**:1394-1405

[84] Lorenzen K, Mathy NW, Whiteford ER, Eischeid A, Chen J, Behrens M, et al. Microglia induce neurogenic protein expression in primary cortical cells by stimulating PI3K/AKT intracellular signaling in vitro. Molecular Biology Reports. 2021;**48**:563-584

*Introductory Chapter: Macrophages – More than Sentinel Innate Immune Cells DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.109647*

[85] Miyamoto A, Wake H, Ishikawa AW, Eto K, Shibata K, Murakoshi H, et al. Microglia contact induces synapse formation in developing somatosensory cortex. Nature Communications. 2016;**7**:12540

[86] Lehrman EK, Wilton DK, Litvina EY, Welsh CA, Chang ST, Frouin A, et al. CD47 protects synapses from excess microglia-mediated pruning during development. Neuron. 2018;**100**: 120-134.e6

[87] Cornell J, Salinas S, Huang HY, Zhou M. Microglia regulation of synaptic plasticity and learning and memory. Neural Regeneration Research. 2022;**17**:705-716

[88] Wang XL, Kooijman S, Gao Y, Tzeplaeff L, Cosquer B, Milanova I, et al. Microglia-specific knock-down of Bmal1 improves memory and protects mice from high fat dietinduced obesity. Molecular Psychiatry. 2021;**26**:6336-6349

[89] Harley SBR, Willis EF, Shaikh SN, Blackmore DG, Sah P, Ruitenberg MJ, et al. Selective ablation of BDNF from microglia reveals novel roles in selfrenewal and hippocampal neurogenesis. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2021;**41**:4172-4186

[90] Parkhurst CN, Yang G, Ninan I, Savas JN, Yates JR, Lafaille JJ, et al. Microglia promote learning-dependent synapse formation through brainderived neurotrophic factor. Cell. 2013;**155**:1596-1609

[91] De Luca SN, Soch A, Sominsky L, Nguyen T-X, Bosakhar A, Spencer SJ. Glial remodeling enhances shortterm memory performance in Wistar rats. Journal of Neuroinflammation. 2020;**17**:52

[92] Nguyen PT, Dorman LC, Pan S, Vainchtein ID, Han RT, Nakao-Inoue H, et al. Microglial remodeling of the extracellular matrix promotes synapse plasticity. Cell. 2020;**182**:388-403.e15

[93] Vainchtein ID, Chin G, Cho FS, Kelley KW, Miller JG, Chien EC, et al. Astrocyte-derived interleukin-33 promotes microglial synapse engulfment and neural circuit development. Science. 2018;**359**:1269-1273

[94] Kohman RA, Bhattacharya TK, Kilby C, Bucko P, Rhodes JS. Effects of minocycline on spatial learning, hippocampal neurogenesis and microglia in aged and adult mice. Behavioural Brain Research. 2013;**242**:17-24

[95] Jiang Y, Liu Y, Zhu C, Ma X, Ma L, Zhou L, et al. Minocycline enhances hippocampal memory, neuroplasticity and synapse-associated proteins in aged C57 BL/6 mice. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. 2015;**121**:20-29

[96] Hou Y, Xie G, Liu X, Li G, Jia C, Xu J, et al. Minocycline protects against lipopolysaccharide-induced cognitive impairment in mice. Psychopharmacology. 2016;**233**:905-916

[97] Lu Y, Giri PK, Lei S, Zheng J, Li W, Wang N, et al. Pretreatment with minocycline restores neurogenesis in the subventricular zone and subgranular zone of the hippocampus after ketamine exposure in neonatal rats. Neuroscience. 2017;**352**:144-154

[98] Berens SC, Bird CM, Harrison NA. Minocycline differentially modulates human spatial memory systems. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020;**45**:2162-2169

[99] Rodríguez-Iglesias N, Sierra A, Valero J. Rewiring of memory circuits: Connecting adult newborn neurons with the help of microglia. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2019;**7**

[100] Gupta N, Dheen S. A paradigm shift: Emerging roles of microglia, a non-neuronal cell, in learning and memory. Neural Regeneration Research. 2021;**16**:1992-1993

[101] Morris GP, Clark IA, Zinn R, Vissel B. Microglia: A new frontier for synaptic plasticity, learning and memory, and neurodegenerative disease research. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. 2013;**105**:40-53

[102] Chawla A, Nguyen KD, Goh YPS. Macrophage-mediated inflammation in metabolic disease. Nature Reviews. Immunology. 2011;**11**:738-749

[103] McNelis JC, Olefsky JM. Macrophages, immunity, and metabolic disease. Immunity. 2014;**41**:36-48

[104] Bhargava P, Lee CH. Role and function of macrophages in the metabolic syndrome. Biochemical Journal. 2012;**442**:253-262

[105] Qin Y, Jia L, Liu H, Ma W, Ren X, Li H, et al. Macrophage deletion of Noc4l triggers endosomal TLR4/TRIF signal and leads to insulin resistance. Nature Communications. 2021;**12**:6121

[106] Everett BM, Donath MY, Pradhan AD, Thuren T, Pais P, Nicolau JC, et al. Anti-inflammatory therapy with Canakinumab for the prevention and management of diabetes. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018;**71**:2392-2401

[107] Esser N, Paquot N, Scheen AJ. Anti-inflammatory agents to treat or prevent type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs. 2015;**24**:283-307

[108] Chen L, Ye H, Zhao X, Miao Q, Li Y, Hu R. Selective depletion of hepatic Kupffer cells significantly alleviated hepatosteatosis and intrahepatic inflammation induced by high fat diet. Hepato-Gastroenterology. 2012;**59**:1208-1212

[109] Papackova Z, Palenickova E, Dankova H, Zdychova J, Skop V, Kazdova L, et al. Kupffer cells ameliorate hepatic insulin resistance induced by high-fat diet rich in monounsaturated fatty acids: The evidence for the involvement of alternatively activated macrophages. Nutrition & Metabolism. 2012;**9**:22

[110] Zeng TS, Liu FM, Zhou J, Pan SX, Xia WF, Chen LL. Depletion of Kupffer cells attenuates systemic insulin resistance, inflammation and improves liver autophagy in high-fat diet fed mice. Endocrine Journal. 2015;**62**:615-626

[111] Morgantini C, Jager J, Li X, Levi L, Azzimato V, Sulen A, et al. Liver macrophages regulate systemic metabolism through non-inflammatory factors. Nature Metabolism. 2019;**1**: 445-459

Section 2
