Section 5 Microbial Flooding

#### **Chapter 9**

## Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery: An Overview and Case Studies

*Neha Sharma, Meeta Lavania, Nimmi Singh and Banwari Lal*

#### **Abstract**

After traditional oil recovery processes, large amount of residual oil are still trapped in the pore spaces of the complex capillary network of the reservoir. MEOR (microbial enhanced oil recovery), a promising tertiary oil recovery method involves the utilization of indigenous microbial species capable of producing various secondary metabolites which further enhances the recovery of oil through their plugging, viscosity or interfacial tension reduction mechanisms. The chapter represents the overview of MEOR, mechanism involved in the process and field trials. Furthermore, microbial based mechanisms are widely demonstrated. The chapter confirms the credibility of MEOR process towards the enhanced oil recovery.

**Keywords:** selective plugging, biogases, solvents, case studies

#### **1. Introduction**

Generally, after the primary (natural pressure) and secondary recoveries (gas injection, water flooding etc.) of crude oil, around 35–55% of oil is left behind in the reservoir that needs to be extracted through other improved or enhanced oil recovery techniques [1]. There are many IOR and EOR techniques currently in practice such as miscible gas injection, polymer flooding and thermal EOR methods [2]. The selection of recovery methods is strongly influenced by the country's economy. Therefore, the development of low-cost technologies that bring maximum oil reserves to production is a major topic of energy research today [2].

#### **2. Microbial enhanced oil recovery (MEOR)**

An economical approach for the recovery of unrecovered oil is MEOR. MEOR often refers to injecting live microorganisms containing essential nutrients into oil reservoirs through injection wells. Under favorable environmental conditions in the reservoir, the infused microorganisms grow exponentially within the reservoirs and develop a variety of metabolites that play a crucial role in the mobilization of unrecovered oil that leads to enhanced oil recovery (**Figure 1**).

#### **Figure 1.**

*Schematic representation of microbial enhanced oil recovery.*

Various factors affect the growth of the microorganisms in oil reservoir *viz.* pressure, porosity, permeability, temperature, pH, dissolved solids, the salinity of the reservoir and availability of nutrients [3]. Therefore it becomes necessary to develop suitable microorganisms which can sustain the reservoir environment and can produce useful metabolites for recovering the oil. MEOR is believed to be able to extract up to 50% of the unrecovered oil remaining in a reservoir after primary and secondary recovery processes have been exhausted [1].

#### **3. Requisite for MEOR**

Instead of the recent renewable energy source available in the market, the world is still dependent on crude oil and petroleum-based products. To establish a green economical process viable research has been going to overcome various drawbacks

#### *Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery: An Overview and Case Studies DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.106641*

such as extraction of crude oil from the reservoirs, reducing the harmful effect of crude oil on the environment etc. [1].

There are various types of recovery processes involved in oil extraction as shown in **Figure 2**. Firstly, primary oil recovery where the well pressure allows the gushing of oil from the reservoir led to less than 30% recovery of oil [4]. Once, the natural pressure of drilled well goes down other enhanced recovery methods were incorporated such a process is called secondary oil recovery methods. Secondary methods involve an injection of water at the wellhead that pushes the oil from the reservoirs. Secondary process accounts for 30–60% oil recovery [5]. To extract the remaining oil from the reservoir, an enhanced oil recovery process also known as a tertiary process can be used which involves surfactants, polymers, solvents, emulsifiers, acids, and dispersants along with the secondary method [6].

Microbial enhanced oil recovery involves two distinct approaches: First, bio augmentation where the exponentially grown microorganisms were injected in the reservoir that is capable of surviving and producing metabolites under harsh conditions. Eventually, the microbial species were occupied the metabolic niche within the oil reservoir. The second approach is an *in-situ* simulation where the nutrients were only added in the well that allows the inhabitant of the well to grow and proliferate to improve the recovery. Before finalizing the approach that needs to be implemented, researchers tend to explain the microbial niche found in the reservoir whether the niche is detrimental or beneficial [7].

**Figure 2.**

*Represents the type of recovery process for the extraction of oil.*

#### **4. Mechanisms involved in MEOR**

The diverse types of mechanisms, metabolites are generated in the process of MEOR that make it complex and comprehensive. Insight knowledge of the MEOR mechanism is the source for determining the feasibility and efficiency of MEOR. In the MEOR process, nutrients are injected into the well in order to promote the proliferation of indigenous microbes. When the inorganic salts are added, the microorganism utilizes the crude oil as a carbon source and converts the complex form into the simple form. Conversely, when the exogenous carbon sources such as sucrose, glucose and molasses are added this led to the generation of more metabolites [1, 8].

The MEOR mechanism can be divided into two parts *viz.* utilizing biomass or biopolymer of microorganisms that selectively block the high permeable zones and facilitate the recovery of oil; another method is utilizing the solvents or biosurfactants that reduces the interfacial tension within the reservoir. If only the viscosity of crude oil is taken into account then recovery can be done in two ways, either reducing the oil-water interfacial tension or by reduction of viscosity through microorganisms or enzymes such as alkyl-monooxygenase/hydroxylase that degrade the heavy fraction of the oil [9].

#### **4.1 Selective plugging**

The major issue related to the recovery is the high porosity of the media found in the reservoirs. The oil saturates the media and accumulated in the inaccessible regions of the media such regions are called thief zones [10, 11]. The aim of the process is to release the entrapped oil from the thief zones, selective plugging involves the clogging of the media of high permeability that prevent the accumulation of oil and also after water flooding divert the water directly into the oil-rich zones that push the oil out of the reservoir. The biomass and biopolymers are used that are attached to the surface of the media where they proliferate. This led to the generation of biofilm and cluster that prevent the seepage of oil into the high permeable regions [12].

Biopolymer is the high molecular weight molecules metabolized by diverse microorganisms that contain hydroxyl groups which make it dipole, ion-dipole and hydrogen bonds with itself or with other substances to develop the network-like structure. These networks form a barrier to enhance the recovery of oil as reported in recent studies [13, 14].

#### **4.2 Reduction of interfacial tension (IFT)**

Biosurfactants are amphipathic molecules that contain both hydrophobic and hydrophilic moieties that can be produced *in situ* by microorganisms. Biosurfactants are effectively used in the recovery of oil from recalcitrant reservoirs [15]. The poor oil recovery is either due to the high viscosity of oil or low permeability of rock formation can be improved by utilizing the biosurfactants that have the capability to reduce the interfacial tension between the aqueous phase and oil saturation [16].

Biosurfactants are capable of reducing the capillary forces that halt the oil movement through the rock pores. Viscous forces are opposing force generated by the capillary forces that promote the flow in the reservoir. The parameter between the two forces is defined as a capillary number that accesses the chances of mobilization of residual oil within the reservoir. There is a direct correlation between the capillary number and mobilization of oil. Therefore, the biosurfactant can enhance the capillary number by reducing the IFT that facilitate the improved oil recovery [17].

#### **4.3 Biogases, solvents and biogenic acids**

MEOR mechanism involves the various metabolites such as solvents, gases and organic acids. Various thermophiles bacteria were reported that have the capability of synthesizing volatile fatty acid, biomass and gases that collectively help in the recovery of around 19% of oil in a core flood assay [13]. Different gases such as CO2, H2, CH4 and other gases were produced during the fermentation of carbohydrates and other hydrocarbons. These gases help in pressurizing the crude oil and also reduce the viscosity of the oil.

Organic acids such as formic acid, acetic acid propionate that are low molecular weight were produced by the microorganisms during the fermentation process. These organic acids are capable of dissolving carbonate rocks that improves the reservoir permeability, whereas, gases and solvents can be reduced in viscosity by dissolving in crude oil [9].

**Figure 3.** *Schematic diagram of steps involved in aerobic degradation of crude oil.*

#### **4.4 Biodegradation**

One of the most attractive mechanisms is biodegradation in the MEOR process. In this process, the microorganisms utilizes the crude oil as a carbon source and convert the heavy fraction into the light components that fundamentally alters the viscosity, fluidity and properties of the crude oil thus, improving the oil recovery. Biodegradation is of two types such as aerobic and anaerobic biodegradation. In aerobic biodegradation initiated when the bacteria have taken up the crude oil that was oxidized by the oxygenase and peroxidases enzymes (**Figure 3**). The peripheral degradation pathway converts the organic components into various intermediates of central metabolism which led to the synthesis of the cell biomass from the precursor (Acetyl-CoA, succinate, and pyruvate) [18].

In general, the environment in a reservoir is anaerobic means no accessibility to oxygen, so various studies have reflected that hydrocarbon degradation was carried out by anaerobic microbes [19]. The in-depth investigation of the process proved that biochemical processes and genes involved belong to the anaerobic biodegradation [20].

On a laboratory scale, microbial-based enhanced oil recovery processes were also reported that showed diverse methanogens (*Methanothermobacter thermoautotrophicus*), bacterial species (*Thermoanaerobacter brockii*, *Thermoanaerobacter italicus*, *Thermoanaerobacter mathranii*, *Thermoanaerobacter thermocopriae*, *Clostridium* sp.) that significantly appeared an efficient model in core flood studies and can be implemented in the field trials [13, 16, 21].

#### **5. Case studies**

Worldwide, numerous MEOR field trials have been implemented that attain varying degrees of success. Statistical dataset showed that in field test more than 90% of MEOR trials represent encouraging affected [22]. United States was the first country to conduct MEOR field trial in 1954 with *Clostridium acetobutylicum*. The microbes were injected along with molasses in the Lisbon oil field of Arkansas which showed the generation of various metabolites such as gases, acid and biosurfactant [22, 23]. A field trial carried out in the Bebee field in Oklahoma showed the nine times lower biosurfactant concentration that was lower than the minimum concentration required for improved oil recovery, *Bacillus* strain was introduced in the field trail [24].

In China, field trials of MEOR had conducted in various oil fields such as Daqing, Shengli, Xinjiang, Jilin, Liaohe, Qinghai, and Changqing. In MEOR application, microbial wax removal was one of the major types used report suggested that a total of 11 fields have d in 1739 wells [25]. In Shengli Oilfield, huff and puff was carried out in 1640 wells, which led to an incremental production of 219,000 tons of crude oil, whereas in Daqing oilfield, microbial huff and puff were performed in 518 wells in 10 blocks that showed an increase in production up to 64,000 tons. In 2012, Daqing oilfield, microbial flooding was carried out in 45 injection wells that led to the total recovery of 56,837 tons of crude oil [26].

In Romania, various field trials were performed in the oil field that produced an average of 100 and 200% crude oil [22]. After the injection of hydrocarbondegrading bacteria and anaerobic bacteria in Piedras Coloradas oil field in Argentina for 1 year, the average production of the wells was increased to 66% and the viscosity of the oil was also reduced effectively. Researchers were also tried to inject facultative anaerobic bacteria along with the nutrients for more than a year and there was a 20% incremental recovery of crude oil which accounts for 27,984 m3 [27].

In Canada, endogenous microbial flooding was performed in the Saskatchewan oil field and results showed a 10% reduction in the water content in the first phase. In the second phase of the test (after 3 weeks), the production of crude oil was increased from 10.18 to 16.7 m3 /d [28]. In the Loco filed of Canada, a specially adapted strain of *Clostridium* was injected along with the nutrients showed promising results such as reduction of oil viscosity due to the production of carbon dioxide; it tends to improve the mobility and sweep efficiency [29].

In India, research on MEOR started in the nineties and since then MEOR processes involving in-situ stimulation and augmentation of microorganisms have been tested successfully with the production of enhanced production of oil. Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) had developed a thermophilic anaerobic bacterial consortium comprising Clostridium and Bacillus species and suitable for MEOR having reservoir temperature between 45°C and 65°C. Field trials were carried out in the Kosamba and Badarpur oil fields of ONGC with oil gain of 1150 m3 and 1200 m3 respectively. Further ONGC initiated research with The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) and hyperthermophilic and halophilic anaerobic bacteria suitable for MEOR in oil reservoirs up to 90°C could be developed. The process has been patented in India, USA and Canada. A Joint Venture company ONGC-The Energy and Resources Institute Biotechnology Limited (OTBL) is implementing the MEOR process in huff and puff mode on a commercial scale. So far MEOR has been done in more than 125 oil wells mostly stripper wells with an average oil gain of about 300 m3 per job/well. Further, research on the development of reservoir and oil specific bacterial consortia led to a yield of 2–8% additional oil recovery over and above waterflood recovery.

ONGC and TERI are in the process of developing the MEOR process for heavy oil reservoirs. Laboratory investigations and core/sand column flood tests are very impressive with a 13% recovery over waterflood recovery with 86% viscosity reduction after treatment of Becheraji oil. Another consortium could give a 13% recovery with a 42% reduction in oil viscosity of Lanwa oil. Field tests in five wells reported viscosity reduction of 17–25% in Becheraji wells and 11–18% in Lanwa wells. These fields were injected with strict anaerobic bacterial consortia habitant of the reservoirs. Statistically, 12 wells in four fields showed a threefold increase in crude oil production and efficient reduction in the water cut [16].

#### **6. Advantages and limitations of the MEOR process**

Numerous advantages associated with the MEOR process are cost-effective process as it involves the bacteria, nutrients and/or other natural products that are easily accessible, it is an economically attractive alternative, consume less energy as compared to the other EOR processes, the benefits of bacterial activity within the reservoir are amplified with time, whereas the opposite is true for other EOR technologies, the involvement of biodegradable products which make the process environmentally friendly [30]. A variety of metabolites such as acids, gas, solvents, surfactants, polymer etc. can be produced by bacterial consortia in the reservoir itself that can work simultaneously to recover the oil through their cumulative effect.

Another advantage including that the microbial processes can be simulated *in situ* within the reservoir, thus minimizing or eliminating the need to accommodate

#### **Figure 4.**

*Advantages of overall MEOR process compared to other recovery processes.*

large storage facilities onsite/offshore (**Figure 4**). No extra infrastructure facility is required to set up for the execution of the MEOR process in the field, particularly for the *in-situ* simulation process.

Various limitations of MEOR processes are it is a complex process as specific bacterial activities are dependent on the condition of reservoirs. Majorly, MEOR field trials were conducted on the stripper wells reduces the microbial enhance recovery thus, impacted the oil recovery. MEOR is a slower process as it takes weeks or even months for proper outcomes. The production of microorganisms in the laboratory under desired reservoir conditions has been proven difficult.

#### **7. Conclusion**

Microbial enhanced oil recovery (MEOR) is advantageous over other recovery processes because of numerous reasons such as being environmentally friendly, economical; requiring fewer amounts of energy and operationally simple. In this chapter, the types of recovery, mechanisms of action and various fields' trials were reviewed that confirms the ultimate oil recovery using MEOR. To gain complete insight into microbial action assisted recovery, extensive field trials in different reservoir environment conditions are needed to generate datasets that will lead to the development of sustainable microbial systems and the defined mechanisms that are effective in the recovery of unrecovered crude oil which is left in the reservoir for a variety of reasons. Most of the trials have been done in huff and puff mode but large scale applications can better be done in flooding mode. The choice of *in-situ* bio-simulation and bioaugmentation approaches largely depends on the type of *in-situ* microflora present in the reservoir. The *in-situ* approach is more cost-effective with minimal or no effect on the ecosystem.

*Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery: An Overview and Case Studies DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.106641*

#### **Author details**

Neha Sharma, Meeta Lavania, Nimmi Singh and Banwari Lal\* Microbial Biotechnology, Environmental and Industrial Biotechnology Division, The Energy and Resources Institute, Delhi, India

\*Address all correspondence to: banwaril@teri.res.in

© 2022 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

### **References**

[1] Sen R. Biotechnology in petroleum recovery: The microbial EOR. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 2008;**34**(6):714-724

[2] Belyaev S et al. Use of microorganisms in the biotechnology for the enhancement of oil recovery. Microbiology. 2004;**73**(5):590-598

[3] Bachmann RT, Johnson AC, Edyvean RGJ. Biotechnology in the petroleum industry: An overview. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2014;**86**:225-237. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.09.011

[4] Gudina EJ et al. Biosurfactantproducing and oil-degrading Bacillus subtilis strains enhance oil recovery in laboratory sand-pack columns. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2013;**261**:106-113

[5] Purwasena IA, Astuti DI, Syukron M, Amaniyah M, Sugai Y. Stability test of biosurfactant produced by *Bacillus licheniformis* DS1 using experimental design and its application for MEOR. Journal of Petroleum Science Engineering. 2019;**2019**:183

[6] Sałek K, Gutierrez T. Surface-active biopolymers from marine bacteria for potential biotechnological applications. AIMS Microbiology. 2016;**2**:92-107. DOI: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.2.92

[7] Da Silva MLB, Alvarez PJJ. Bioaugmentation. In: Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology. Springer; 2010. pp. 4531-4544

[8] Pereira JFB, Gudiña EJ, Costa R, Vitorino R, Teixeira JA, Coutinho JAP, et al. Optimization and characterization of biosurfactant production by Bacillus subtilis isolates towards microbial

enhanced oil recovery applications. Fuel. 2013;**111**:259-268. DOI: 10.1016/j. fuel.2013.04.040

[9] Niu J, Liu Q, Lv J, Peng B. Review on microbial enhanced oil recovery: Mechanisms, modeling and field trials. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2020;**192**:107350

[10] Hong E, Jeong MS, Lee KS. Optimization of nonisothermal selective plugging with a thermally active biopolymer. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2019;**173**:434-446

[11] Okeke T, Lane R. Simulation and economic screening of improvedconformance oil recovery by polymer flooding and a thermally activated deep diverting gel. In: Proceedings of the SPE Western Regional Meeting. 2012

[12] Karimi M et al. Investigating wettability alteration during MEOR process, a micro/macro scale analysis. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2012;**95**:129-136

[13] Sharma N, Lavania M, Kukreti V, Rana DP, Lal B. Laboratory investigation of indigenous consortia TERIJ-188 for incremental oil recovery. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2018;**9**:2357

[14] Xu L et al. Synergy of microbial polysaccharides and branchedpreformed particle gel on thickening and enhanced oil recovery. Chemical Engineering Science. 2019;**208**:115138

[15] Brown LR. Microbial enhanced oil recovery (MEOR). Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2010;**13**(3):316-320

[16] Sharma N, Lavania M, Kukreti V, Lal B. Instigation of *Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery: An Overview and Case Studies DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.106641*

indigenous thermophilic bacterial consortia for enhanced oil recovery from high temperature oil reservoirs. PLoS One. 2020;**15**(5):e0229889

[17] Gray MR, Yeung A, Foght JM. Potential microbial enhanced oil recovery processes: A critical analysis. In: Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition; Denver, CO. 2008. pp. 3-27

[18] Sharma N, Lavania M, Lal B. Microbes and their secondary metabolites: Agents in bioremediation of hydrocarbon contaminated site. Achieves in Petroleum Environmental and Biotechnology. 2019;**4**(2):151. DOI: 10.29011/2574-7614.100051

[19] Lavania M, Cheema S, Lal B. Potential of viscosity reducing thermophillic anaerobic bacterial consortium TERIB#90 in upgrading heavy oil. Fuel. 2015;**144**:349-357. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.12.003

[20] Callaghan AV, Wawrik B, Ní Chadhain SM, Young LY, Zylstra GJ. Anaerobic alkane-degrading strain AK-01 contains two alkylsuccinate synthase genes. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2008;**366**(1):142-148

[21] Rathi R, Lavania M, Sawale M, Kukreti V, Kumar S, Lal B. Stimulation of an indigenous thermophillic anaerobic bacterial consortium for enhanced oil recovery. RSC Advances. 2015;**5**:88115-88124

[22] Safdel M, Anbaz MA, Daryasafar A, Jamialahmadi M. Microbial enhanced oil recovery, a critical review on worldwide implemented field trials in different countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017;**74**:159-172

[23] Lazar I, Petrisor IG, Yen TE. Microbial enhanced oil recovery (MEOR). Petroleum Science and Technology. 2007;**25**(11-12):1353-1366

[24] Youssef N et al. In situ biosurfactant production by Bacillus strains injected into a limestone petroleum reservoir. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2007;**73**(4):1239-1247

[25] Wang W. Laboratory research and field trials of microbial oil recovery technique. Oil Drilling Products and Technology. 2012;**34**(1):107-113

[26] Gao C. Experiences of microbial enhanced oil recovery in Chinese oil fields. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2018;**166**:55-62

[27] Strappa LA, De Lucia JP, Maure MA, Llopiz MLL. A Novel and Successful MEOR Pilot Project in a Strong Water-Drive Reservoir Vizcacheras Field. Argentina: Society of Petroleum Engineers, Tulsa, Oklahoma; 2004. p. 24

[28] Town K, Sheehy AJ, Govreau BR. MEOR success in southern Saskatchewan. SPE-158022-PA 13. 2010;(5):773-781

[29] Davidson S, Russell H. A MEOR pilot test in the Loco field. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on the Application of Microorganisms to Petroleum Technology. 1988

[30] Udipta Saikia BR, Vendhan E, Santosh KY, Siva SS. A brief review on the science, mechanism and environmental constraints of microbial enhanced oil recovery (MEOR). International Journal of ChemTech Research. 2013;**5**(3):1205-1212

### *Edited by Badie I. Morsi and Hseen O. Baled*

*Enhanced Oil Recovery - Selected Topics* includes nine chapters in five sections. Chapters address enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes, such as miscible flooding, surfactants flooding, polymers flooding, and microbial flooding. They also present fundamental and technical details along with case studies. This book provides ample and useful knowledge for the design of laboratory-scale and field-scale EOR processes. It is a useful resource for practitioners working in oil field production applications and graduate students pursuing advanced degrees in petroleum engineering.

Published in London, UK © 2022 IntechOpen © carloscastilla / iStock

Enhanced Oil Recovery - Selected Topics

Enhanced Oil Recovery

Selected Topics

*Edited by Badie I. Morsi and Hseen O. Baled*