**6. Conclusion**

In summation, there remains a scarcity of valuable research about EI in family medicine residency that obviously welcomes more consideration. Studies are needed to further address each of the themes that emerged in this chapter. Certainly, increased focus must be given to the standardization and applicability of EI measurement in healthcare providers. Additionally, the benefits and shortcomings of the instruments that have been used in health care studies such as the Emotional Competence Inventory, Mayer-Salovery-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test, or specially designed 360-degree evaluations must be further explored. Likewise, greater attention must be paid to the particular components of EI, the most optimal time to focus on them during the training period, and how enhancing these competencies may shape the career trajectory of physicians. A real discussion must take place if all physicians should receive formal emotional intelligence and leadership development training, or if it should be only for those who are

*Emotional Intelligence and Leadership Development: Implications for Family Medicine… DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.99463*

specifically recruited or express an interest. Finally long-term outcomes of EI training on family physician, patient, and hospital systems are needed. Solutions to these enquires will command extraordinary leadership to solve imminent healthcare challenges.
