**7. Conclusion**

Based on the study result and discussion, the following conclusions can be drawn.


The developed Internal Quality Assurance System model has two different paradigms: the quality standards set and how to build or manage those quality standards; commitment to collegiality, respect for diversity, strong focus on improving or improving quality, recognition of responsibility and institutional autonomy, commitment of stakeholders. While aspects of quality standards; Universities must develop national higher education standards set by the Indonesian government plus other standards developed by each university. By merging the paradigm of quality standards and quality assurance system management in the Internal Quality Assurance System Model, it can help and facilitate universities in conducting quality assurance and improving quality standards on an ongoing basis.

*Knowledge Management in the Indonesian Higher Education Internal Quality Assurance System… DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.101874*
