**3.2 Devices and components for OAM-SDM over fibers**

In the original and the first experiment from Allen et al. in 1992 [52], helically phased LG beam was generated from Hermite-Gaussian (HG) beams. The transformation has been based on cylindrical lens (CL). The advantage of CL is its high conversion efficiency and the high purity of generated OAM. However, CL requires high construction precision. Indeed, it has poor flexibility because it requires a very precise incident field angle.

Other obvious way to implement OAM beams is to use a spiral phase plate (SPP) [59–64]. In principle, when a Gaussian light beam passes through the phase plate, the beam experiences a different phase in the azimuth direction due to the spiral

*Multiplexing, Transmission and De-Multiplexing of OAM Modes through Specialty Fibers DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.101340*

**Figure 5.** *Different applications of OAM.*

thickness of the phase plate and is converted into a helically phased beam with topological charge *l*. The advantage of SPP is that is very efficient, and allows the conversion of beams with relatively high power. However, since it is wavelength dependent, it needs extreme precision in manufacturing: different plate is needed for each kind of OAM mode (each *l*). Recent trend is the proposed adjustable spiral phase plate in [64]. Some diffractive optical devices or elements can be explored targeting to generate OAM light beams [65, 66]. Among these devices, fork grating are used for generating twisted light (holographic gratings). Fortunately, thanks to fork grating, we can generate multiple topological charges (different OAM beams) simultaneously (i.e. using vertical and horizontal superimposed fork gratings). However, this element seems to be inefficient and a variation of this technique has been proposed to improve its efficiency, using forked polarization grating [66]. Metamaterials (complex artificial materials) is another strategy that can make transformations in optical space [67, 68]. OAM modes are obtained by controlling the geometrical parameters (shape, size, direction, etc.) of the metamaterial to manipulate the phases of different azimuths and change the spatial phase of the incident light. A liquid crystal panel, q-plates is another promising and efficient way to generate twisted beams [69–71]. A light beam incident on q plate is modified to have a topological charge variation.

At last, one of the most convenient method to generate OAM beams is the use of spatial light modulator (SLM) [63, 72–74]. Made of liquid crystals, SLM is a programmable device that uses a computer [63]. It is composed of a matrix of pixels, and each pixel can be programmed to generate a given phase (there also exists SLMs that act on amplitude instead of phase). By modulating the phases of Gaussian beams, we can generate a wide range of OAM modes. SLM is a versatile component, it can be reconfigured as needed. It is even possible to send different beams on different sections of the SLM, to generate several beams simultaneously. On the other hand, due to its polarization dependent, SLM accepts only limited power. Another method to generate OAM light beams, is possible to use optical fiber. Acting as a mode selector [75] or a mode converter [76, 77], optical fiber seems to be useful in OAM mode generation. Fiber coupler [78], mechanical grating [79, 80], tilted optical grating [81], helical grating [82], multicore fibers [83–86] and liquid core optical fiber [87] are example of such method. **Figure 6** presents the most of examples of OAM generation devices & schemes.

OAM beam is doughnut shaped (never has intensity at its center). This characteristic is not sufficient to identify OAM beams and their topological charge. At the receiver of a communication system, the different OAM modes can be separated easily by exploiting the orthogonality of the helical phase fronts. A variety of methods for detecting OAM has been proposed for light. In principle, the detection operation can be performed using several techniques including those used for the generation: The operation of OAM beams detection is similar to the generation but in the inverse sens (inverse SPP [88], holographic grating [51, 89]). A common way to identify OAM is to interfere (interference method) the incident beam with a Gaussian beam, and to visualize the resulting interference pattern on a camera. Two cases are resulted: If the incident beam is Gaussian, the interference pattern

**Figure 6.** *OAM generation devices & components & schemes.*

*Multiplexing, Transmission and De-Multiplexing of OAM Modes through Specialty Fibers DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.101340*

will look like a series of concentric circles. If the incident beam has a helical phase front, the interference pattern will be a spiral. Then, the number of arms and the direction of the spiral indicate the topological charge and the sign of *'l'* respectively. This technique is useful to validate the presence of OAM beam but it cannot be used for demultiplexing. Another efficient way, using a phase pattern or a fork grating on a glass plate or a SLM, to convert the incident beam back to Gaussian. A mode sorter was proposed to identify OAM modes, where the lateral position of the resulting beam tells the topological charge or the incident beam [90–92]. Recently, machinelearning-based approaches (ML) have been implemented in order to accurately identify OAM modes, after their propagation in free space [93, 94]. ML offer great potential in mode detection even after propagation in a turbulent medium. Many other OAM mode detection techniques are reviewed in [95, 96].
